CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMISSION HEARINGS RE: THE CHURCH OF SC

[admin]

Exhibit 5

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 6 OCTOBER 1967

Remimeo

CONDITION OF LIABILITY

Below Non-Existence there is the Condition of Liability. The being has ceased to be simply non-existent as a team member and has taken on the colour of an enemy.

It is assigned where careless or malicious and knowing damage is caused to projects, orgs or activities. It is adjudicated that it is malicious and knowing because orders have been published against it or because it is contrary to the intentions and actions of the remainder of the team or the purpose of the project or org.

It is a liability to have such a person unwatched as the person may do or continue to do things to stop or impede the forward progress of the project or org and such a person cannot be trusted. No discipline or the assignment of conditions above it has been of any avail. The person has just kept on messing it up.

The condition is usually assigned when several dangers and non-existences have been assigned or when a long unchanged pattern of conduct has been detected.

When all others are looking for the reason mail is getting lost, such a being would keep on losing the mail covertly.

The condition is assigned for the benefit of others so they won't get tripped up trusting the person in any way.

Such a person, assigned a Condition of Liability, may not wear any insignia or uniform or similar clothing to the group and must wear a dirty grey rag tied around the left arm.

The formula of liability is:

1. Decide who are one's friends.

2. Deliver an effective blow to the enemies of the group one has been pretending to be part of despite personal danger.

3. Make up the damage one has done by personal contribution far beyond the ordinary demands of a group member.

4. Apply for re-entry to the group by asking the permission of each member of it to rejoin and rejoining only by majority permission, and if refused, repeating 2 and 3 and 4 until one is allowed to be a group member again.

CONDITION OF TREASON

When one knowingly takes the pay or favours of a group's or project's enemies while appearing to be a friend of or part of the group or project, the Condition is Treason.

The formula for Treason Condition is:

1. Deliver a paralyzing blow to the enemies of the group one has worked against and betrayed.

2. Perform a self-damaging act that furthers the purposes and or objectives of the group one has betrayed.

3. Inform the group, project or org one has betrayed of one's previous betrayal and 1 and 2 above and petition each member for forgiveness.

4. Abide by their reaction or decision.

CONDITION OF DOUBT

When one cannot make up one's mind as to an individual, a group, org or project, a Condition of Doubt exists.

The formula is:

1. Inform oneself honestly of the actual intentions and activities of that group, project or org brushing aside all bias and rumour.

2. Examine the statistics of the individual, group, project or org.

3. Decide on the basis of "the greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics" whether or not it should be attacked, harmed or suppressed or helped.

4. Evaluate oneself or one's own group, project or org as to intentions and objectives.

5. Evaluate one's own or one's group, project or org's statistics.

6. Join or remain in or befriend the one which progresses toward the greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics and announce the fact publicly to both sides.

7. Do everything possible to improve the actions and statistics of the person, group, project or org one has remained in or joined.

8. Suffer on up through the conditions in the new group if one has changed sides, or the conditions of the group one has remained in if wavering from it has lowered one's status.

CONDITION OF ENEMY

When a person is an avowed and knowing enemy of any individual, a group, project or org, a Condition of Enemy exists.

The formula is:

1. Examine oneself and one's mind or have it examined to be sure that one's attitude is not based on prejudice or aberration or mere similarity to something else.

2. Decide if one's reaction to the individual, group, project or org is based on one's personal fear or the urging of others or on actual menace.

3. Assume the Condition of Doubt and apply its formula.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:mwp.rd
Copyright © 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[The formulas for the Conditions of Enemy and Treason given above were modified by HCO P/L 23 October 1967, Enemy Formula, page 245, and HCO P/L 16 October 1961, page 247, respectively. The penalties (grey rag, etc). associated with the above conditions formulas were cancelled by HCO P/L 6 October 1970 Issue III, Ethics Penalties, and reinstated by HCO P/L 19 October 1971 (corrected & reissued 22 Oct 71), Ethics Penalties Reinstated, and then later modified by HCO P/L 16 November 1971, Conditions, Awards and Penances. These Policies can be found in the 1970 and 1971 Year Book. A corrected table of Conditions is given in HCO P/L 14 March 1968 on page 247.]

[admin]

Exhibit 6

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 3 FEBRUARY 1960

SECURITY CHECK

In keeping with policy carried out by all Central Organizations, an E-Meter check will be made on all new and existing staff at Saint Hill.

An E-Meter is better known as a "Lie-detector" and is used to ascertain truth of background and conduct.

The following points will be covered by the examiner:

Any criminal background
Any Communist or subversive connection
Spreading of slander concerning Saint Hill or its people
Discouraging new employees by malicious lies
Receipt of commissions on purchases for Saint Hill
Overts against Doctor or Mrs. Hubbard.

No staff at Saint Hill are exempt.

No suspicion is necessarily attached to any person at Saint Hill. This is a security check. It is an effort to clear the air.

The test will be administered by Robin Harper, Technical Secretary, and any undesirable results will be rechecked by Mrs. Hubbard.

L. RON HUBBARD


DIAGRAM OF E-METER
For use with HCO Bulletin of Feb. 10. 1060

____________________________________________________________

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 30 MARCH 1960

All Auditors in
South Africa
CenOCon

INTERROGATION

(How to read an E-Meter on a silent subject)

When the subject placed on a meter will not talk but can be made to hold the cans (or can be held while the cans are strapped to the soles or placed under the armpit), I am sorry if that sounds brutal, it isn't, it is still possible to obtain full information from the subject.

Asking questions, one expects no reply, asks for no pictures. The auditor just watches the needle for dips when questions are asked.

It is best to start with several nul questions: "Will it rain?" "Do you like bread" etc. And then shift off to heavier leads. At any time the subjects gets too agitated to read, return to asking nul questions or use the agitation as a dip.

Meter response for "No" or negative or don't know = no fall.
Meter response for "Maybe" "You're getting close" = slight fall.
Meter response for "Yes" or "Correct" = steep fall.

Sample interrogation: Subject is given cans. Nul questions are asked. Then:

"Were you persuaded to make trouble? (fall)
"Was the person who persuaded you a native?" (fall)
"What was the person's name" (no verbal answer, heavy fall)
"Do you know where the person who persuaded you lives?" (heavy fall)
(Name various nearby towns.
"Does the person live in .....?"
Take town with heaviest fall.

Divide town named into streets, sections, sort out the exact part of the town named. Give leads on location until you know the house.

If person were educated you would use: "Considering the alphabet to divide at O, does the person's last name start with a letter in the first half of the alphabet (pause, look at meter) or the last half of the alphabet" (pause, look at meter, compare the two readings - you may have to ask this two or three times). "All right, it was the first half. Now was it A, B, C, was it D, E, F, etc." "Now the second letter of the person's last name ......" (repeat the same performance).

It is a good idea to mark down your findings on a blackboard where the subject can see them if he's very reluctant and can read.

A phonetic system can be worked out for subjects who are not educated. Maps of town areas are useful with one [illegible] the meter you just point to areas of the map and let the meter guide you in.

When you have worked out an area or name, repeat it several times and shift it around until you get maximum drop.

A whole mine of information can be picked up from a silent person.

On reporter looking for possible accidents is a good convincer. Tell the reporter not to speak and use over and under times "Have you ever had an accident?" "Was it more than five years ago?" Was it less than five years ago? Watch the needle pin it down to maximum fall. That's the year. Now go the month [illegible] of year then, for first half, ask about Jan. Feb. Mar. Month found get the day. Then the hour of the day. Then the type of vehicle or accident. Then who was hurt, etc. Reporters always start talking somewhere along about this time. Don't pay any attention, just go on and nail it down.

In a security check, you want the person who persuaded the person you have on the cans to engage in a riot. When you locate and have brought this new person, you do the same thing. But now you have a whole committee of names to get and your subject is better educated.

Taking ten people from a strike or riot, you can find the instigator of their group. Finding the instigator and getting him on the cans you can run it back to a higher command level.

The end product is the discovery of a terrorist, usually paid, usually a criminal, often trained abroad.

Given a dozen people from any riot or strike, you can find the instigator of that group or more than one. Finding that one, you can get his boss.

Twenty or thirty paid agents provocateurs can keep a whole country in revolt. Clean them up and the riots collapse.

Thousands are trained every year in Moscow in the ungentle art of making slave states. Don't be surprised if you wind up with a white.

Revolts kill an awful lot of natives. Only when security has been established can a reform be applied.

Use E-Meter "clean hands" to convince people that a population is loyal and that reforms are in order.

In the riots in London, anybody arrested has his fine paid for him by some mysterious group. Demonstrators are recruited. So this isn't limited to South Africa.

Crack the agents provocateurs' identities and you've cracked the new slavery of Earth -- the worker's production demanded by the state for nothing.

We have a lot of reforms ourselves but we don't need criminal agents or dead people killed in riots to put them in effect. Don't use guns, use E-Meters to make a country secure.

By the way, the answer to passive resistance is for the government to passive strike against any district from which it occurs. No water, lights, pay, government or service. Simply use the same tactic back. Don't use guns, cordon the area off and shut off power and water.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH: js,cden
Copyright (c) 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[HCO B 2 January 1967, Dating - Forbidden Words, Volume VI, page 191, changes the words use for dating. See The Book of E-Meter Drills, Drill EM-25, for correct E-Meter dating procedure.]

____________________________________________________________

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 7 APRIL 1961

HCO Secs
Any Directors
of Security
Remimeo only for use

JOHANNESBURG SECURITY CHECK

This is the Johannesburg Security Check sheet further amplified by myself. This is the roughest security check in Scientology. We will call it the "Jo'burg Security Check." It does not necessarily replace other check sheets but it is probably the most thorough one we have now.

In reprinting this for n use legal (foolscap) length and double-space everything except directions.

Joburg Security Check Sheet

HCO Security Form 2

_______________
Name of Person

_______________
Date

_______________
Name of Security Checker

Directions: Attempt to clear any fall observed. Mark any fall observed or any meter reaction change elicited by the question. Then write what it cleared on. Mark largely if the fall could not be cleared since this constitutes a failure to pass. Only fail somebody if there is no needle motion of any kind even with sensitivity at 16 on any question. If they are failing because it is hard to clear a question, work very thoroughly on it in an effort to clear it. In all cases complete the test.

If an important question fails to clear even after Security Checker has worked very hard to get it off, the test is flunked.

The following statement should be read or quoted to the person being Security Checked:

"We are about to begin a Security Check. We are not moralists. We are able to change people. We are not here to condemn them. While we cannot guarantee you that matters revealed in this check will be held forever secret, we can promise you faithfully that no part of it nor any answer you make here will be given to the Police or the State. No Scientologist will ever bear witness against you in Court by reason of answers to this Security Check. This Security Check is exclusively for Scientology purposes. The only ways you can fail this Security Check is to refuse to take the test to fail to answer its questions truthfully or if you are here knowingly to injure Scientology. The only penalty attached to failure of this check is processing or our refusal to employ you or issue you a certificate, and this will only happen if we find that you are trying now to injure Scientology. You can pass this test by (1) agreeing to take it, (2) answering each question truthfully and (3) by not being a member of a subversive group seeking to injure Scientology."

The first questions are nul questions to determine your reaction pattern.

We will now begin --

Lie Reaction:

Are you sitting in a chair?
Are you on the moon?
Are all cats black?
Am I an ostrich?
Is this Earth?
Have you ever drunk water?
Are you holding up a tree?
Am I an elephant?
Are you a table?
Is this a Security Check?

Have you ever lived or worked under an assumed name?
Have you given me your right name?
Are you here for a different purpose than you say?
Have you ever stolen anything?
Have you ever forged someone else's signature?
Have you ever blackmailed anybody?
Have you ever been blackmailed?
Have you ever smuggled anything?
Have you ever been in prison?
Have you ever indulged in drunkenness?
Have you ever done any reckless driving?
Have you ever burglared any place?
Have you ever embezzled money?
Have you ever assaulted anyone?
Have you ever been in jail?
Have you ever told lies in Court?
Have you ever had anything to do with Pornography?
Have you ever committed Arson?
Have you ever been a Drug Addict?
Have you ever peddled Dope?
Have you had any dealings with stolen goods?
Do you have a Police Record?
Have you ever raped anyone?
Have you ever been involved in an abortion?
Have you assisted in any abortion?
Have you ever committed adultery?
Have you ever practised Homosexuality?
Have you ever had intercourse with a member of your family?
Have you ever been sexually unfaithful?
Have you ever practised Sodomy?
Have you ever consistently made a practice of sexual perversion?
Have you ever slept with a member of a race of another colour?
Have you ever committed culpable homicide?
Have you ever bombed anything?
Have you ever murdered anyone?
Have you ever kidnapped anyone?
Have you ever done any illicit Diamond buying?
Have you ever betrayed anyone for money?
Have you ever threatened anyone with a fire-arm?
Have you been in illegal possession of firearms.
Have you ever been paid for giving evidence?
Have you ever destroyed something belonging to someone else?
Have you ever been a spy for an Organization?
Have you ever had anything to do with Communism or been a Communist?
Have you ever been a newspaper reporter?
Have you ever had intercourse while under the influence of drugs?
Have you ever had intercourse while under the influence of alcohol?
Have you ever used drugs or blackmail to procure sex?
Have you ever ill-treated children?
Have you ever taken money for giving anyone sexual intercourse?
Have you ever had any connection with a brothel?
Have you ever had anything to do with a baby farm?
Have you ever been a spy for the Police?
Are you afraid of the Police?
Have you ever done anything you are afraid the Police may find out.
Have you ever falsified the books in any firm you worked for?
Have you ever done anything your Mother would be ashamed to find out?
How could you help yourself generally?
What represents yourself?
How could you help your family?
What represents your family?
How do you feel about sex?
What represents (the Org
(thers
(a group to you?
How could you help (the Org?
(others?
(a group?
How could you help mankind?
Have you ever controlled people?
How do you feel about being controlled?
Who represents mankind to you?
How could you help animals and plants?
What represents animals and plants to you?
How could you help material things?
What represents Matters, Energy, Space and Time to you?
How could you help Spirits?
What represents Spirits to you?
How could you help God or Infinity?
What represents God or Infinity to you?
What is Communism?
Do you feel Communism has some good points?
Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?
Have you ever been a member of any group with similar ideas as the Communist Party?
Do you know any Communist personally?
Have you ever injured Dianetics or Scientology?
Have you ever committed any overts on a Scientology Organization?
Have you ever stolen anything from a Scientology Org?
Do you have any overts on LRH?
Have you ever had unkind thoughts about LRH?
Do you have any overts on Mary Sue?
Have you ever had any unkind thoughts about Mary Sue?
Have you ever injured any Scientologist?
Have you ever had any unkind thoughts about Scientologists?
Have you ever betrayed Scientology?
Do you know of any secret plans against Scientology?
Have you ever taken money to injure Scientology?
Have you ever used Dianetics or Scientology to force sex upon someone?
Do you know of any plans to injure a Scientology Organization?
Are you upset about this Security Check?

_______________
Passed

_______________
Failed

_______________
Why?

_______________
Signed by Examiner

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:lmw.rd
Copyright (c) 1961
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[admin]

Exhibit 7

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1959

HCO Franchise Holders
Association Secretaries
HCO Secretaries

THE ORGANIZATION OF A PE FOUNDATION

Even though we haven't the time, personnel or mest to do in many places a full dress PE Foundation, I think it would help if I described a minimum full dress PE.

A PE Foundation is itself but it is also, in a Central Org, one of the six departments. In either case, whether done as an HAS Co-audit Franchise or as a Central Org Department, it has the same staff and routine, handles the same factors and confronts the same problems.

A PE Foundation is a programmed drill calculated to introduce people to Scientology and to bring their cases up to a high level of reality both on Scientology and on life. This is best accomplished not by giving them samples and bits and trying to lead them into auditing but by giving them gen and serious results as heavily and rapidly as possible. A PE Foundation in its attitude goes for broke on the newcomers, builds up their interest with lectures and knocks their cases apart with Comm Course and Upper Indoc.

There are basically three divisions to a PE Foundation; the first of these is the free course; it is the purpose of this course to:

Inform and interest by showing the people that this applies to them and is a duplicate of their own actions and thinkingness. Only then does Scientology communicate. Don't overwhelm -- penetrate. Show them that this is how they think, not how we think they think. Be factually explicit about it, talk with certainty and not with apologies.

A PE Course curriculum should now consist of a mixture of drills and lectures. The first evening lecture should talk about definitions in life as found in Scientology. The dynamic principle of existence, the eight dynamics, a preview of the next evening's lecture should be given, and this lecture should consist of a very rapid survey of Comm Course TRs Zero and One and should sail in the second hour into the ARC triangle, and all data for the rest of the week used in lectures should consist of ARC triangle data taking up the whole subject and one corner at a time. The remainder of the week previews TRs Two and Three, and says how the TRs are used in life and how people can't do them. The last lecture's last part sells the HAS Comm Course.

The second week and the third are spent in Comm Course with basic TRs, encouraging not criticizing. The coach says fine when he thinks it's fine and otherwise keeps his mouth shut. This is muzzled coaching. The student does not get out of the Comm Course until he can be trusted to show up well in a muzzled co-audit. This takes at least two weeks. He pays off the course by the week for his Comm Course as well as his later Co-audit.

The Co-Audit Course runs similar to the Comm Course in hours. The only process now permitted on an HAS Co-audit is "From where could you communicate to a body part", the body part being selected by the instructor with an E-Meter (in a pinch the instructor selects by observation and the answer to the question, "Ever have anything wrong with your body?" and uses whatever the pc says). When a key body part is flat, "From where could you communicate to a body" can be run but only this type of process is allowed. If you go and bring in a lot more processes you've had it. Only this process can be counted on to bring reality and results to people on a broad scale. When a person can't gain on it because of case then get him into private auditing. NEVER let anyone simply walk out. Convince him he's loony if he doesn't gain on it because that's the truth.

Very well, these are the sections of the PE Foundation. A student now has to complete at least five weeks of co-audit before we give him an HAS certificate. It's not a valuable certificate evidently unless we do it that way.

Now for personnel. Nearly every PE Foundation everywhere is understaffed. Many have to be. But one should at least know the correct amount of staff.

The minimum full scale PE staff should consist of five people, four of them part time, one of them full time. These people are as follows:

The PE Director. Takes no classes, makes no lectures, works from two to ten p.m., supervises and interviews and keeps the course and other instructors going. Lack of a PE Director without a class leaves the place unsupervised and in a confusion.

Receptionist. Routes, handles and invoices people with the help of other PE staff in the first rush, and then makes announcements and sells books in the breaks.

PE Lecturer. The best and most convincing lecturer, evenings only.

Comm Course Instructor. Part-time. Anybody but the Academy Comm Course instructor that knows his business. The Academy man will be too tough and heartless for the public stomachs at this stage.

Co-audit Instructor. Part-time. Choose the person people tell their troubles to. Choose a person who doesn't mind people screaming in the unit and in fact rather likes it. This person takes responsibility for all cases.

The PE Director, as does the HGC Director of Processing, gets in trouble really if he takes a course or a class, as he leaves all other activities unguided. He can drop in, he can start a class. He can give an address of welcome, but he should not have a class. If he has one the whole place falls apart for lack of a guiding hand and somebody competent to pick up and sort out the emergencies and interview people.

Now roughly speaking, that's the staff curriculum and courses of a PE Foundation. If yours is running a long way from this one, that is the reason you're having a rough time and losing people and that's the shape you ought to be shooting for. I know we can't all have this but when things start to boom you'd better be able to have it or you'll go boom too. The thing to do is to sneak up to this as a minimum size with which you can work.

If there's no Central Org you'll need daytime secretarial and files by and by or the PE Director will get swamped with papers.

The whole dream of a PE Foundation is to get the people in fast, get them invoiced in a congress type assembly line, no waiting, give them hot, excited, positive service and boot them through to their HAS and THEN worry about doing something else with them. And never let a student leave or quit - introvert him like a bullet and get him to get audited. If he gets no reality don't let him wander out. If he walks in that door for a free PE, that's it. He doesn't get out except into an individual auditor's hands in the real tough cases, until he's an HAS.

So that's the size and shape of it.

Luck to you.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:brb.rd
Copyright © 1959
by L. Ron Hubbard

[admin]

Exhibit 8

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
37 Fitzroy Street, London, W.1

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 AUGUST 1960
Re-issued from Sthil

Assn Secs
HCO Secs

DEPT OF GOVT AFFAIRS

(Cancels any previous directions to set up a Special Zone Dept)
(This Policy Letter is mandatory all Central Organizations)

There shall be established on a board level and outside the structure of the Central Org and HCO but under the board of HASI Ltd, a new department to be called "The Department of Government Affairs".

More and more, as governments disintegrate under the threat of atomic war and communism, central organizations have had to give high executive time to governmental affairs to the great loss of the organizations themselves. The enturbulence entered into Scientology activities by legal matters, tax matters, and matters of assisting governments to maintain stability, has sapped our time and fixed our attention to our own loss.

Now to remedy this situation, I wish to contain and cordon, in a military sense, this incursion and to prohibit utterly and completely such entrance (of these matters or our own project for governments) into Central Org or HCO comm lines. In other words, Central Orgs and HCOs are run by, for and as Scientology service and activity units and the special Department of Government Affairs shall handle other matters and specifically deny such non-Scientology matters entrance into organizational comm lines.

The Department of Government Affairs shall be headed and directed with a minimum of personnel and shall not be able to call upon the personnel of the Central Org or HCO for further assistance than the relay of communications.

The Director of Government Affairs shall be a fully qualified person of good judgement subject to control of the Board of Directors and shall be subject to the advices and directions of the Board and the HCO and Assn Secretary. Only Washington and South Africa are excluded from supervision of the Dept by the Assn Sec, Org Sec and HCO Sec. In all other offices the Director of Government Affairs shall be subordinate to the Assn Sec and HCO Sec.

Under this department comes the corporation's solicitors, attorneys, chartered accountants and any attorney or accountant hired directly by the corporation for outside legal or tax or filing purposes.

The allotment and issue of shares comes under this department, but the actual invoicing and banking shall be done as always by the Dept of Accounts or, for HCO, by the HCO Secretary.

All contracts, filings with the government, all tax reports and their preparation, corporation minutes, annual meetings, legal papers, suits against and by the corporation, whether HASI Ltd or HCO Ltd, all legal investigatory work and detectives, all contacts with government agents, bureaus and departments, all assistance to governments, messages to governments, handling answers from governments or courts shall be cared for by the Department, whether to advance or protect Scientology or its corporations by government or legal channels.

All legal documents and the Valuable Document files for HCO and HASI shall be kept by the Department in a proper safe in accordance with previous rules written for the keeping and handling of valuable documents.

All share sales reports and all legal, governmental and corporation reports to be made to the boards shall be made to it by this Department.

No shares may be advertised or issued save with the approval of this department.

No contracts, purchases or mortgages may be undertaken without the approval of this Department and then only by the action of this Department.

It is clearly understood that the Department shall not undertake financial management for the Central Org or HCO nor may it direct the Central Org or HCO on purely Scientology affairs or Scientology dissemination except where these may impinge directly upon the government, and even then this Department is enjoined from forcing government laws or rulings upon the Central Org or HCO by threat of danger or ominous advices, nor may the Department employ either solicitors nor accountants who specialize in ominous advices to the Orgs since the Orgs could be discouraged or impeded by such.

The object of the Department is to broaden the impact of Scientology upon governments and other organizations and is to conduct itself so as to make the name and repute of Scientology better and more forceful. Therefore defensive tactics are frowned upon in the department. We are not trying to make the Central Orgs and HCOs "be good". We are trying to make their reach more secure and effective. Only attacks resolve threats.

In the face of danger from Govts or courts there are only two errors one can make: (a) do nothing and (b) defend. The right things to do with any threat are to (1) Find out if we want to play the offered game or not, (2) If not, to derail the offered game with a feint or attack upon the most vulnerable point. which can be disclosed in the enemy ranks, (3) Make enough threat or clamor to cause the enemy to quail, (4) Don't try to get any money out of it, (5) Make every attack by us also sell Scientology and (6) Win. If attacked on some vulnerable point by anyone or anything or any organization, always find or manufacture enough threat against them to cause them to sue for peace. Peace is bought with an exchange of advantage, so make the advantage and then settle. Don't ever defend. Always attack. Don't ever do nothing. Unexpected attacks in the rear of the enemy's front ranks work best.

Never put the organization on "wait" because of courts or other matters. It's up to the Department to make the actions of HCO Secs and Org Secs right, not enjoin right actions on the HCO and Org Secs.

To win we must have treasure and verve. If a Central Org and HCO function perfectly as service units then treasure and consequent security for the further advance are to hand. If the Department operates with verve and elan, even with rashness, it will afford a screen behind which organizations can work.

Example: BMA attacks Scientology in Australia via the government. Answer: throw heavy communication against the weakest point of the BMA -- its individual doctors. Rock them with petitions to have medical laws modified which they are to sign. Couple the BMA attack with any group hated by the government. Attack personally by threats or suits any person signing anything for the BMA. Slam the matter into politics, advance a bill into parliament that strips the BMA of all legal rights by opening healing to all. Make the attack by the BMA look ridiculous. Attack medical practices. Investigate horrible practices loudly. (Always investigate loudly never quietly.) Make the distinct public and governmental impression and BMA impression that they've run into a barrage of arrows or electronic cannon and that continued attack by them will cause their own disintegration. As all this is being done on a thought or idea level the restimulation of their engrams results in the total impression that they are surrounded by their own dead and the battery may fire again at any minute. And if one makes in writing not one slanderous or libelous statement, there is no defense by them. This example is patterned on what just happened and what we did in Australia where we are winning strongly.

The personnel of the Department should be freed of past track legal and governmental overts by the HGC using evening auditing. This is a must or the Department will otherwise attract attacks. Further, the higher the department personnel is raised on "control" through running help, the less action will have to be undertaken by it and the more it will actually accomplish without violent action.

The goal of the Department is to bring the government and hostile philosophies or societies into a state of complete compliance with the goals of Scientology. This is done by high level ability to control and in its absence by low level ability to overwhelm. Introvert such agencies. Control such agencies. Scientology is the only game on Earth where everybody wins. There is no overt in bringing good order.

The offices of the Department, so far as is possible, should be so situated as to bring no government traffic into the main avenues, comm lines or halls of the Central Organization or HCO or so as to divert it to the maximum extent from said avenues, comm lines and halls.

The following personnel appointments are made, conditional to acceptance, as Directors of Government Affairs:

United States: Marilynn Routsong
Los Angeles: Dick Steves
South Africa: Jack Parkhouse
Australia: Denny Gogerly
London: George Hay
New Zealand: Steve Stevens.

In the United States and South Africa the head of the Department of Government Affairs shall be also Trustee or Area Director of the Central Organization while the Org Sec and Assn Sec shall not be, but will be officers of the corporation.

This policy letter and these appointments are prompted by the following facts:

1. My own traffic on government legal affairs is far too heavy and I need help of magnitude on a continental level.

2. HCO Secs and Assn Secs are having difficulty holding down their Orgs and the field because of the time demanded by government affairs.

3. The activity will get heavier rather than lighter.

(a) The deterioration of government order is accelerating with consequent confusion in all related affairs;

(b) Increasing amounts of order must be maintained by us at a governmental level against the possibility of finding our areas without governments.

4. We are about to file HASI Ltd and HCO Ltd in all areas with the attendant heavy legal and governmental action necessary.

5. We are about to arrange for the release of and the issue of over half a million pounds of shares to the public, thus making heavy demands on legal and government lines.

6. We are about to finance and erect various media of communications, such as radio stations, on the various continents and this will require enormous amounts of liaison and action in such a department.

7. We are about to finance and find new quarters in the United States and such activities come under the new Department.

8. Due to new clearing techniques, our sphere of control is widening. This is purely a case phenomenon, but will be felt heavily by Orgs in the future. It is necessary to provide comm lines for this widening of influence.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:js.gh cden
Copyright © 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

__________________________________________________________________

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF [illegible] AUGUST 1960

All Orgs
Sec EDs

DEPT OF GOVT RELATIONS

The Dept of Govt Relations may not use Org personnel for grouping and mailing, and may only use Org personnel for reception, switchboard and [illegible] purposes.

Where numbers of mailing pieces are envisioned or where numbers of outside letters are to be sent by the Dept of Govt Relations, these may be done either by outside agencies or by a full or part time secretary to the Dir of GR. The necessary high appearance of GR letters and mailing pieces does not admit the use of mimeo and GR may not use organizational mimeo machines.

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:js.rd
Copyright © 1960
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[admin]

Exhibit 9

HCO ETHICS ORDER

EO 157 LV
17 Sept. 1972

TO: THOSE CONCERNED
FROM: HCO LAS VEGAS
SUBJECT: SOED 151 INT

LIST OF DECLARED SP's, PERSONS CONNECTED TO SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS, DESERTERS AND FREELOADERS (Who as such are already the subject of FCOs, Local or International Ethics Orders.)

ADCOCK, Al, EXPELLED, EO137LV, 7 July 72, LAS VEGAS
ADCOCK, Coletta, EXPELLED, EO 137 LV, 7 July 72, LAS VEGAS
BOSSICK, Bernard, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
BUBKE, Liz, FREELOADER, E094LV, 17 Mar 72, LAS VEGAS
BURKE, Jamie, FREELOADER, EO 204 LV, 25 Feb 70, LAS VEGAS
CACIOPPO, Gail, FREELOADER, EO 112 LV, 10 April 72, LAS VEGAS
BUSHNELL, J.L., SP, EO 94 LV, 6 Feb 69, LAS VEGAS
CALDWELL, LARRY, SP, EO 141 LV, 15 April 69, LAS VEGAS
CHERMAK, Darrell, EXPELLED, EO 145 LV, 29 Aug 72, LAS VEGAS
CHRISTIANSEN, Robert, SP, EO 154 LV, 27 June 1969, LAS VEGAS
CIAMPI, Vicki & Robert, EXPELLED, EO 111 LV, 7 Apr 72 LAS VEGAS
BRUNER, Howard, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 24 Apr 67, LAS VEGAS|
CHOVANACK, Don, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 3 Nov 71, LAS VEGAS
COOPER, Bob & Dottie, FREELOADERS, EO 167 LV, 4 Jan 1970, LAS VEGAS
CULPEPPER, John, SP, EO 7 LV, 6 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
CURRIER, John, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
DAVIS, Gary & Mary, FREELOADERS, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
DAY, Gene, SP, NO EO #, 28 Nov 70, LAS VEGAS
DIFATTE, Ann, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
DIGRE, John, FREELOADER, EO 114 LV, 14 Apr 72, LAS VEGAS
DOYLE, Billy, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 25 Nov 69, LAS VEGAS
EADY, Van, EXPELLED, EO 194 LV, 2 Feb 70, LAS VEGAS
EASLEY, LeAnn, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 28 Oct 68, LAS VEGAS
ELLIOT, Janet, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 10 Apr 72, LAS VEGAS
ENGEL, Gary, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 5 Oct 70, LAS VEGAS
ESPOSITO, Joe, EXPELLED, EO 70 LV, 17 Dec 68, LAS VEGAS
ESPOSITO, Sue, SP GROUP, EO 90 LV, 5 Feb 69, LAS VEGAS
FAIRBANKS, Janie, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 15 Oct 71, LAS VEGAS
FISCHER, Herbie, SP GROUP, EO 52 LV, 3 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
FISCHER, Hobert, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 17 Dec 69, LAS VEGAS
FISCHER, Rheina, SP GROUP, EO 52 LV, 3 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
FISCHER, R.Z., SP, EO 52 LV, 3 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
FLORES, Barbara, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
GALLAGHER, John, EXPELLED, EO 153 LV 12 Sept 72, LAS VEGAS
GILLESPIE, Rex, SP, EO 2 LV, 2 July 68, LAS VEGAS
GROFF, Charles, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, LAS VEGAS
JANSCO, Joni, EXPELLED, EO 93 LV, 17 Mar 72, LAS VEGAS
HANEY, Candy, SP GROUP, NO EO #, 69, LAS VEGAS
HEARN, Lynn, FREELOADER, EO 177 LV, 27 Jan 70, LAS VEGAS
HEIGH, Frederick, SP GROUP, NO EO #, 27 Feb 71, LAS VEGAS
HENSEL, Wes, EXPELLED, EO 84 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
HIRSCH, Phlorene, SP GROUP, EO 88 LV, 1 Mar 72, LAS VEGAS
KASNESIS, Margaret, EXPELLED, EO 54 LV, 6 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
KUDIAK, Una, SP, EO 145 LV, 22 Apr 69, LAS VEGAS
KUTCH, Adele, SP, EO 94 LV, 6 Feb 69, LAS VEGAS
LAND, Bill, SP, EO 18 LV, 15 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
LANDER, Mel, SP, NO EO #, NO DATE, LAS VEGAS
LEDDY, Shirley, EXPELLED, EO 50 LV, 17 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
LOUDERMILK, Mike & Judy, EXPELLED, EO 69 LV, 3 Jan 72, LAS VEGAS
McGAHA, Bill, SP, EO 6 LV, 6 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
McHENLY, Harvey, SP, EO 16 LV, 14 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
MELTON, Jack, EXPELLED, EO 152 LV, 10 Sept 72,* LAS VEGAS
MOLLAN, Ed, SP, NO EO #, 26 Feb 71, LAS VEGAS
MURRAY, Sonny, EXPELLED, GO order, 25 Nov 69, LAS VEGAS
PAPALIA, John, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
PARKER, John, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 25 Nov 69, LAS VEGAS
PAUL, Florence, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 19 Sept 69, LAS VEGAS
PEDERSON, Edie, EXPELLED, EO 50 LV, 17 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
HOLLAND, Dianne, FREELOADER, EO 167 LV, 4 Jan 70, LAS VEGAS
PETERMAN, Pete, FREELOADER, EO 167 LV, 4 Jan 70, LAS VEGAS
PETERSON, Cliff, FREELOADER, EO 79 LV, 30 Jan 69, LAS VEGAS
PHAIR, PHLORA, SP GROUP, EO 52 LV, 3 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
PHIEGH, Florence, SP GROUP, EO 52 LV, 13 Feb 71 LAS VEGAS
PHREIGH, Richley, SP GROUP, EO 52 LV, 3 Dec 71, LAS VEGAS
POND, Charles, EXPELLED, EO 13 LV, 3 Aug 72, LAS VEGAS
RICKARD, Harry, SP, EO 137 LV, 7 Mar 69, LAS VEGAS
REIMER, Karen, FREELOADER, EO 167 LV, 4 Jan 70, LAS VEGAS
RUDDOCK, Bill, FREELOADER, EO 123 LV, 2 May 72, LAS VEGAS
RUSSO, Gary, SP, EO 15 LV, 14 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
SAUNDERS, Carl, EXPELLED, EO 85 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
SHEMA, Chris, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
SHEMA, Elizabeth, EXPELLED, EO 79 LV, 14 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
SELNICK, Bob, SP, EO 1 LV, 2 July 68, LAS VEGAS
SLATER, Teri, FREELOADER, EO 106 LV, 26 Mar 72, LAS VEGAS
SMITH, Norman, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
SMITH, Tommie, EXPELLED, EO 127 LV, 16 May 72, LAS VEGAS
STEEL, Ken, EXPELLED, EO 78 LV, 14 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
SWETLICK, Gary, EXPELLED, EO 284 LV, 8 Mar 71, LAS VEGAS
TEPLANSKY, Tom, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
TOLLEY, Jean, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
TONNE, Angelo, EXPELLED, NO EO #, 25 Nov 69, LAS VEGAS
VAN BLAIR, Carol, SP, EO 118 LV, 18 Feb 69, LAS VEGAS
VAN BLAIR, Jerry, SP, EO 3 LV, 5 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
WALSH, Cassia, EXPELLED, EO 133 LV, 26 June 72, LAS VEGAS
WELCH, David, FREELOADER, EO 83 LV, 25 Feb 72, LAS VEGAS
WIGGINS, Shirley, SP, EO 4 LV, 6 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
WRIGHT, Phil, SP, EO 5 LV, 6 Aug 68, LAS VEGAS
ZINGALE, Jimmy, EXPELLED, EO 174 LV, 14 Jan 70, LAS VEGAS

Bob Rainer
HCO AS LV
for: Loy Combs Freedman
C/O LV

[admin]

Exhibit 10

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 APRIL 1965

Gen Non-Remimeo
HCO Sec Hat
Tech Sec Hat
D of P Hat
D of T Hat

HCO JUSTICE DATA RE ACADEMY & HGC
HANDLING THE SUPPRESSIVE PERSON
THE BASIS OF INSANITY

The suppressive person (whom we've called a Merchant of Fear or Chaos Merchant and which we can now technically call the suppressive person) can't stand the idea of Scientology. If people became better, the suppressive person would have lost. The suppressive person answers this by attacking covertly or overtly Scientology. This thing is, he thinks, his mortal enemy since it undoes his (or her) "good work" in putting people down where they should be.

There are three "operations" such a case seeks to engage upon regarding Scientology: (a) to disperse it, (b) to try to crush it and (c) to pretend it didn't exist.

Dispersal would consist of several things such as attributing its source to others and altering its processes or structure.

If you feel a bit dispersed reading this Policy Letter, then realize it is about a being whose whole "protective colouration" is to disperse others and so remain invisible. Such people generalize all entheta and create ARC Breaks madly.

The second (b) is done by covert or overt means. Covertly a suppressive person leaves the org door unlocked, loses the E-Meters, runs up fantastic bills, and energetically and unseen seeks to pull out the plug and get Scientology poured down the drain. We, poor fools, consider all this just "human error" or "stupidity". We rarely realize that such actions, far from being accidents, are carefully thought out. The proof that this is so is simple. If we run down the source of these errors we wind up with only one or two people in the whole group. Now isn't it odd that the majority of errors that kept the group enturbulated were attributable to a minority of persons present? Even every "reasonable" person could not make anything else out of that except it was very odd and indicated that the minority mentioned were interested in smashing the group and that the behaviour was not common to the whole group -- meaning it isn't "normal" behaviour.

These people aren’t Communists or Fascists or any other ists. They are just very sick people. They easily become parts of suppressive groups such as Communists or Fascists because these groups, like criminals, are suppressive.

The Suppressive Person is hard to spot because of the dispersal factor mentioned above. One looks at them and has his attention dispersed by their “everybody is bad”.

The Suppressive Person who is visibly seeking to knock out people or Scientology is easy to see. He or she is making such a fuss about it. The attacks are quite vicious and full of lies. But even here when the Suppressive Person exists on the “other side” of a potential trouble source, visibility is not good. One sees a case going up and down. On the other side of that case, out of the auditor’s view, is the Suppressive Person.

The whole trick they use is to generalize entheta. “Everybody is bad.” “The Russians are all bad.” “Everybody hates you.” “The People versus John Doe” on warrants. “The masses.” “The Secret Police will get you.”

Suppressive groups use the ARC Break mechanisms of generalizing entheta so it seems “everywhere”.

The Suppressive Person is a specialist in making others ARC Break with generalized entheta that is mostly lies.

He or she is also a no-gain-case.

So avid are such for the smashing of others by covert or overt means that their case is bogged and won’t move under routine processing.

The technical fact is that they have a huge problem, long gone and no longer known even to themselves which they use hidden or forthright vicious acts continually to “handle”. They do not act to solve the environment they are in. They are solving one environment, yesterday’s, in which they are stuck.

The only reason the insane were hard to understand is that they are handling situations which no longer exist. The situation probably existed at one time. They think they have to hold their own, with averts against a non-existent enemy to solve a non-existent problem.

Because their overts are continuous they have withholds.

Since such a person has withholds, he or she can’t communicate freely to as-is the block on the track that keeps them in some yesterday. Hence, a “no-case-gain”.

That alone is the way to locate a Suppressive Person. By viewing the case. Never judge such a person by their conduct. That is too difficult. Judge by no-case-gains. Don’t even use tests.

One asks these questions:

1. Will the person permit auditing at all? or

2. Does their history of routine auditing reveal any gains?

If (1) is "No", one is safe to treat the person as suppressive. It is not always correct but it is always safe. Some errors will be made but it is better to make them than to take a chance on it. When people refuse auditing they are (a) a potential trouble source (connected to a Suppressive Person); (b) a person with a big discreditable withhold; (c) a Suppressive Person or (d) have had the bad luck to be “audited” too often by a Suppressive Person or (e) have been audited by an untrained auditor or one “trained” by a Suppressive Person.

[The last category (e) (untrained auditor) is rather slight but (d) (audited by a Suppressive Person) can have been pretty serious, resulting in continual ARC Breaks during which auditing was pressed on without regard to the ARC Break.]

Thus there are several possibilities where somebody refuses auditing. One has to sort them out in an HGC and handle the right one. But HCO by policy simply treats the person with the same admin policy procedure as that used on a Suppressive Person and lets HGC sort it out. Get that difference – it’s “with the same admin policy procedures," not “the same as”.

For treating a person “the same as” a Suppressive Person when he or she is not only adds to the confusion. One treats a real Suppressive Person pretty rough. One has to handle the bank.

As to (2) here is the real test and the only valid test: Does their history of routine auditing reveal any gains?

If the answer is NO then there is your Suppressive Person, loud and very unclear!

That is the test.

There are several ways of detecting. When fair auditors or good ones have had to vary routine procedure or do unusual things on this case in an effort to make it gain, when there are lots of notes from Ds of P in the folder saying do this – do that – you know that this case was trouble.

This means it was one of three things: 1. a potential trouble source 2. a person with a big withhold 3. a Suppressive Person.

If despite all that trouble and care, the case did not gain or if the case simply didn’t gain despite auditing no matter how many years or intensives, then you’ve caught your Suppressive Person.

That’s the boy. Or the girl.

This case performs continual calculating covert hostile acts damaging to others. This case puts the enturbulence and upset into the environment, breaks the chairs, messes up the rugs and spoils the traffic flow with "goofs" done intentionally.

One should lock criminals out of the environment if one wants security. But one first has to locate the criminal. Don't lock everybody out because you can't find the criminal.

The cyclic case (gains and collapses routinely) is connected to a Suppressive Person. We have policy on that.

The case that continually pleads "hold my hand I am so ARC broken" is just somebody with a big withhold, not an ARC Break.

The Suppressive Person just gets no-case-gain on routine student auditing.

This person is actively suppressing Scientology. If such will sit still and pretend to be audited the suppression is by hidden hostile acts which include:

1. Chopping up auditors;

2. Pretending withholds which are actually criticisms;

3. Giving out "data" about their past lives and/or whole track that really holds such subjects up to scorn and makes people who do remember wince;

4. Chopping up orgs;

5. Alter-ising technology to mess it up;

6. Spreading rumours about prominent persons in Scientology;

7. Attributing Scientology to other courses;

8. Criticizing auditors as a group;

9. Rolling up Dev-T, off policy, off origin, off line;

10. Giving fragmentary or generalized reports about entheta that cave people in -- and isn't actual;

11. Refusing to repair ARC Breaks;

12. Engaging in discreditable sexual acts (also true of potential trouble sources);

13. Reporting a session good when the pc went bad;

14. Reporting a session bad when the pc went up in tone;

15. Snapping terminals with lecturers and executives to make critical remarks or spread ARC Break type "news" to them;

16. Failing to relay comm or report;

17. Making an org go to pieces (note one uses "making" not "letting");

18. Committing small criminal acts around the org;

19. Making "mistakes" which get their seniors in trouble;

20. Refusing to abide by policy;

21. Non-compliance with instructions;

22. Alter-is of instructions or orders so that the programme fouls up;

23. Hiding data that is vital to prevent upsets;

24. Altering orders to make a senior look bad;

25. Organizing revolts or mass protest meetings;

26. Snarling about Justice.

And so on. One does not use the catalogue, however, one only uses this one fact -- no case gain by routine auditing over a longish period.

This is the fellow that makes life miserable for the rest of us. This is the one who overworks executives. This is the auditor killer. This is the course enturbulator or pc killer.

There's the cancer. Burn it out.

***

In short, you begin to see that it's this one who is the only one who makes harsh discipline seem necessary. The rest of the staff suffers when one or two of these is present.

One hears a whine about "process didn't work" or sees an alter-is of tech. Go look. You'll find it now and then leads to a Suppressive Person inside or outside the org.

Now that one knows who it is, one can handle it.

But more than that, I can now crack this case!

The technology is useful in all cases, of course. But only this cracks the "no-gain-case".

The person is in a mad, howling situation of some yesteryear and is "handling it" by committing overt acts today. I say condition of yesteryear but the case thinks it's today.

Yes, you're right. They are nuts. The spin bins are full of either them or their victims. There's no other real psycho in a spin bin!

What? That means we've cracked insanity itself? That's right. And it's given us the key to the Suppressive Person and his or her effect on the environment. This is the multitude of "types" of insanity of the 19th century psychiatrist. All in one. Schizophrenia, paranoia, fancy names galore. Only one other type exists -- the person the Suppressive Person got "at". This is the "manic-depressive" a type who is up one day and down the next. This is the Potential Trouble Source gone mad. But these are in a minority in the spin bin, usually put there by Suppressive Persons and not crazy at all! The real mad ones are the Suppressive Persons. They are the only psychos.

Over simplification? No indeed. I can prove it! We could empty the spin bins now. If we want to. But we have better uses for technology than saving a lot of Suppressive Persons who themselves act only to scuttle the rest of us.

You see, when they get down to no-case-gain where a routine process won't bite, they can no longer as-is their daily life so it all starts to stack up into a horror. They "solve" this horror by continuous covert acts against their surroundings and associates. After a while the covert ones don't seem to hold off the fancied "horror" and they commit some senseless violence in broad daylight -- or collapse -- and so they can get identified as insane and are lugged off to the spin bin.

Anybody can "get mad" and bust a few chairs when a Suppressive Person goes too far. But there's traceable sense to it. Getting mad doesn't make a madman. It's damaging actions that have no sensible detectable reasons that's the trail of madness. Any thetan can get angry. Only a madman damages without reason.

All actions have their lower scale discreditable mockery. The difference is, does one get over his anger? The no-case- ain of course can't. He or she stays misemotional and adds each new burst to the fire. It never gets less. It grows. And a long way from all Suppressive persons are violent. They are more likely to look resentful.

A Suppressive Person can get to one solid dispassionate state of damaging things. Here is the accident prone, the home wrecker, the group wrecker.

Now here one must realize something. The Suppressive Person finds outlet for his or her unexpressed rage by carefully needling those they are connected with into howling anger.

You see the people around them get dragged into this long gone incident by mistaken identity. And it is a maddening situation to be continually misidentified, accused, worked on, doubled crossed. For one is not the being the Suppressive Person supposes. The Suppressive Person's world is pretty hard to live around. And even ordinarily cheerful people often blow up under the strain.

So be careful who you call the Suppressive Person. The person connected with a Suppressive Person is liable to be only visible rage in sight!

You have some experience of this -- the mousey little woman who rarely changes expression and is so righteous connected to somebody who now and then goes into a frenzy.

How to tell them apart? Easy! Just ask this question:

Which gets a case gain easily?

Well, it's even simpler than that! Put the two on an E-Meter. Don't do anything but read the dial and needle. The Suppressive one has the high stuck T.A. The other has a lower T.A. Simple?

Not all Suppressive Persons have high T.A. The T.A. can be anywhere especially very low (1.0). But the needle is weird. It is stuck tight or it RSes without reason (the pc wearing no rings to cause an RS).

Suppressive Persons also can have the "dead" thetan clear read!

You see people around a Suppressive Person Q and A and disperse. They seek to "get even" with the Suppressive Person and often exhibit the same symptoms temporarily.

Sometimes two Suppressive Persons are found together. So one can't always say which is the Suppressive Person in a pair. The usual combination is the Suppressive Person and the Potential Trouble Source.

However you don't need to guess about it or observe their conduct.

For this poor soul can no longer as-is easily. Too many overts. Too many withholds. Stuck in an incident that they call "present time". Handling a problem that does not exist. Supposing those around are the personnel in their own delirium.

They look all right. They sound reasonable. They are often clever. But they are solid poison. They can't as-is anything. Day by day their pile grows. Day by day their new overts and withholds pin them down tighter. They aren't here. But they sure can wreck the place.

There is the true psycho.

And he or she is dying before your very eyes. Kind of horrible.

The resolution of the case is a clever application of problems processes, never o/w. What was the condition? How did you handle it is the key type of process.

I don't know what the percentage of these are in a society. I know only that they made up about 10% of any group so far observed. The data is obscured by the fact that they ARC Break others and make them misemotional -- thus one of them seems to be, by contagion, half a dozen such.

Therefore simple inspection of conduct does not reveal the Suppressive Person. Only a case folder puts the seal on it. No-Case-Gain by routine processes.

However this test too may soon become untrustworthy for now we can crack them by a special approach. However we will also generally use the same approach on routine cases as it makes cases go upward fast and we may catch the Suppressive Person accidentally and cure him or her before we are aware of it.

And that would be wonderful.

But still we'll have such on our lines in Justice matters from now on. So it's good to know all about them, how they are identified, how to handle.

HCO must handle such cases as per the HCO Justice Codes on Suppressive Acts when they blow Scientology or seek to suppress Scientologists or orgs. One should study up on these.

The Academy should be careful of this and report them to HCO promptly (as they would potential trouble sources or withholds that won't be delivered). The Academy must not fool about with Suppressive Persons. It's a sure way to deteriorate a course and cave in students.

POLICY

When an Academy finds it has a Potential Trouble Source, a "withholdy case that ARC Breaks easily" or a Suppressive Person enrolled on a course or a blow the Academy must call for HCO Department of Inspection & Reports, Justice section. This can be any HCO personnel available, even the HCO Sec.

The HCO representative must wear some readily identified HCO symbol and must take a report sheet with a carbon copy on a clip board.

HCO must have present other staff adequate to handle possible physical violence.

The student, if still present, must be taken to a place where an interview will not stop or enturbulate a class, by Tech Division personnel. This can be any Tech Division office, empty auditing room or empty classroom. The point is to localize the commotion and not stir up the whole Tech Division.

If Tech Division personnel is not available HCO can recruit "other staff" anywhere by simply saying "HCO requires you" and taking them into the interview place.

HCO has a report sheet for such matters, original and one copy for Justice files.

The HCO representative calls for the student's folder and looks it over quickly for TA action. If there is none (less than 10 divs/sess) that's it. It is marked on the report sheet, "No TA action in auditing" or "Little TA". HCO is not interested in what processes were run. Or why there is no TA. If the course requires no meters the folder is inspected for alter-is (which denotes a rough pc) or no case changes.

If there are no TA notations in the folder HCO should put the person on a meter, making sure the person is not wearing a ring. One asks no questions, merely reads the TA position and notes the needle and marks these in the report sheet. The Tone Arm will be very high (5 or above) or very low (2 or less) or dead thetan (2 or 3) and the needle would be an occasional RS or stuck or sticky if the person is a Suppressive Person. This is noted in the report sheet.

If the folder or the student in question says he has had no case gain this is again confirming of a Suppressive Person.

If two of these three points (folder, meter, statement) indicate a Suppressive Person, HCO is looking for two possible students when so called in -- the one who caused the upset and that student's coach or student's auditor. There very likely may be a Suppressive Person on the course that is not this student. Therefore one looks for that one too, the second one.

If a bit of questioning seems to reveal that the student's auditor was responsible, test that student too, and enter it on a second HCO report form. And order the other one to auditing at the student's own expense.

In short be alert. There's been an upset. There may be other persons about who caused it. Don't just concentrate on the student. There is a condition on the course that causes upsets. That is really all one knows.

When one walks in on it, find out why and what.

If the HCO tests indicate some doubt about either student being a Suppressive Person, HCO asks about a possible withhold and enters any result on the sheet and sends the students and sheet separately to the Tech Division, Dept of Estimation. The procedure is the same for a Suppressive Person but is "a withholdy pc who ARC Breaks easily" or simply "a withholdy pc" if no ARC Breaks are noted. "Auditing recommended".

But there is a third category for which HCO is very alert in this interview. And that is the POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE.

For this person may only be audited further if he or she disconnects or handles the Suppressive Person or group to which he or she is connected and can't be sent to the HGC or back to the course either until the status is cleared up.

If this seems the case, there is no point in continuing the person in the Tech Division and HCO takes over fully, applying the policy related to Potential Trouble Sources.

This type of case will probably not be dangerous but quite co-operative, and probably dazed by having to do something about his situation. He or she has been hammered with invalidation by a Suppressive Person and may be rather wobbly but if the Justice steps are taken exactly on policy there should be no trouble. HCO can take a Potential Trouble Source (but never a Suppressive Person) out of the Tech Division premises and back to HCO to complete such briefing. Remember, it is all one to us if the Potential Trouble Source handles it or not. Until it's handled or disconnected we don't want it around as it's just more trouble and the person will cave in if audited under those conditions (connected to a Suppressive Person or group).

A Suppressive Person found in an Academy is ordered to HGC processing always. And always at his or her own expense.

If the Suppressive Person won't buy auditing, or co-operate, HCO follows steps A to E in policy on Suppressive Persons in the Justice Codes; HCO may be assisted in this by Tech personnel.

The point is, the situation must be handled fully there and then. The student buys his auditing or gets A to E. There is no "We'll put you on probation in the course and if..." because I've not found it to work. Auditing or Suppressive Person A to E. Or both.

THE BLOWN STUDENT

The student however may have blown off the premises or he has gone entirely. On a minor, momentary blow, where all it took was the student's auditor and a few words to get the student back, the matter is not a real blow.

But where the student leaves the premises in a blow or doesn't turn up for class, the Tech Division must send an Instructor and the student's auditor over to HCO Department of Inspection and Reports. An HCO representative should go with them at once to pick up the student.

The student is brought back with as little public commotion as possible and the procedure of HCO checkout, etc is followed as above.

THE GONE STUDENT

Where the student can't be gotten back (or in all such cases) the real cause may be a Suppressive Person in the Course itself, not the blown student or the upset student.

If the Suppressive Person is on the course (and is not the blown student) HCO will want to know this. In all such cases the one who caused the environment may not be the culprit.

The HCO representative calls for the blown student's case folder and looks for TA. If there is none or for some reason the student wasn't audited, or if no meters were used on that course, HCO seeks to find out what the case's responses were to processing.

If the case seemed to change or improve yet the student is gone, HCO looks over the blown student's ex-auditor for suppressive characteristics such as satisfaction the pc blew, critical statements about tech or instructors, case rough or difficult, lies about the circumstances, etc, and if such signs are present, HCO orders the blown student's ex-auditor to the HGC at the student's own expense.

If this interview with the blown student's auditor seems to indicate a Suppressive Person beyond any doubt HCO orders the student to the HGC at the student's own expense.

The blown student's course auditor will not be found usually to be a Potential Trouble Source as these are seldom bad or rough auditors, so questions about this possibility don't really apply.

But if this student (the blown student's auditor) is Suppressive, it's HGC or A to E. If the student gives on A to E he or she may be returned to course or to the HGC as HCO deems best.

In all such cases where a Suppressive Person is found, watch out for legal repercussions by having reliable witnesses present during such negotiations or upsets and take liberal notes for possible Comm Ev. This is why there also must be an HCO representative handling it.

If there is no agreement to be audited and the student who is found to be a Suppressive Person will not respond to A to E (because student has blown and can't be found or because the student flatly refuses), the student is considered terminated.

A waiver or quit claim is given or sent the student stating:

Date
Place

I ............... having refused to abide by the Codes of (name and place of org) do hereby waive any further rights I may have as a Scientologist and in return for my course fee of .......... I do hereby quit any claim I may have on (name of org) or any Scientologist personnel or any person or group or organization of Scientology.

Signed

2 Witnesses

Only when this is signed the student may have his course fee returned, but no other fees as he accepted that service.

The ex-student should realize this makes him Fair Game and outside our Justice Codes. He may not have recourse of any kind beyond refund. And after signing can only return to Scientology as per policy on Fair Game.

The HGC audits such a Suppressive Person sent to it on special processes specially issued by HCO B for Suppressive Persons. It will be found that adherence to these policies will make Academies very calm.

Note: Nothing in this policy letter waives or sets aside any policy concerning the auditing of known institutional cases in an HGC. Persons with histories of institutionalized insanity may not be audited in HGC.

L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER

P.S. If you've wondered if you are a Suppressive Person while reading this -- you aren't! A Suppressive Person never does wonder, not for a moment! THEY KNOW THEY'RE SANE!

L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:wme.eden
Copyright © 1965
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME: The practice of declaring people FAIR GAME will cease. FAIR GAME may not appear on any Ethics Order. It causes bad public relations. This P/L does not cancel any policy on the treatmen tor handling of an SP. [From HCO P/L 21 October 1968, Volume __, page 489]

[admin]

Exhibit 11



MAGAZINE ARTICLES ON
LEVEL
0
CHECKSHEET
BY L RON HUBBARD

As a subdivision of general public to general public we have the problem of the professionals which might consider Scientology to be antipathetic to them, amongst these would be psychologists and medical doctors as well as psychiatrists. These persons are entirely in error when they express the opinion that Scientologists are against them. Scientology does not consider them sufficiently important to be against. Flour pills or any incantation or system will produce in 22 percent, of the public, benefit. Therefore, any practice or art can always achieve 22 per cent recovery in their patients. It is when we better this 22 percent, that we are being efficient. We have no more quarrel with a psychologist that we would have with an Australian witch-doctor. We have no quarrel with a psychiatrist any more that we would quarrel with a barbarian because he has never heard of nuclear physics. As to the medical doctor, we know very well that modern medical practice, having lately outgrown phlebotomy, has come of age to point where is can regulate structure in a most remarkable and admirable way. In Scientology we believe a medical doctor definitely has his role in a society just as an engineer has his role in civil government. We believe that a medical doctor should perform emergency operations such as those made necessary by accidents; that he should perform orthopaedics; that he should deliver babies; that he should have charge of the administration of drugs; that his use of antibiotics is beneficial; and that wherever he immediately and curatively addresses structure he is of use in a community. The only place we would limit a medical doctor is in the field of treatment of psychosomatic medicine, where he has admittedly and continuously failed, and the only thing we would ask a medical doctor to change about his practice is to stop taking money for things he knows he cannot cure, i.e., spiritual, mental, psychosomatic, and social ills.

With regard to psychologists, medical doctors, and psychiatrists, then what would one say in talking with them? But again we have section 10 of the Code of the Scientologist. You wouldn't expect this psychologist, or psychiatrist, or medical doctor to get into an argument with you on how to get rats or find their way through mazes, how you would set a tibia, or what voltage you would put on an electric shock machine. Therefore, and equally, do not permit yourself to be put in the situation where you are discussing privately or in public, the methodologies of your wisdom. The attitude of a Scientologist toward people in these professions should be: "I have my techniques. It took me a long time to learn them just as it took you a long time to learn yours, and I am not going to try to make a minister out of you, and you are not going to try to make a medical doctor (psychiatrist, psychologist) out of me. I am an expert instructor only where it is intimately involved with the human spirit. I can produce my effects. You can produce yours. In view of the fact that you do not pretend to operate in the field of structure, I do not see how there can be any discussion. But things that I can't handle is structure when called upon I will be very happy to refer to you, and I shall expect that when matters of the spirit come into question you will have enough understanding of life, where we are all specialists, to refer them to me. A quiet explanation of this character will do a great deal to place you as a professional man in their realm of understanding of professional men.

Should anyone challenge you for having suddenly secured a relief in a hospital or an institution from some dire malady which balked the efforts of the professional men in charge of it, and should you ever be "called upon the carpet" for having "interfered" with the progress of a case, you should be extremely dismayed, and act it, to find yourself in the presence of barbarians who do not believe in the power of prayer, in the will of God, or the promises of Jesus Christ. And you should point out that, whereas the body was in their keeping, they did not at any time care to take purview of the human soul. And if anything has occurred because the soul, in your province, then reacted upon the body, you believe that they are unwilling to admit the will of God in their treatment of human beings, and if this is the case you now, while you are being addressed by such people, discover yourself to be in a strange place where men pretending to be Christians doubt God, the Son of God, and the power of prayer. Your entire address to such people, in such a situation, publicly or privately, should be entirely over, accusative, and not at any time apologetic. And you should immediately make it your business to place this matter before the proper authorities, that people are in charge of an institution here, are not Christians, and do not believe in God, and you should inform your accusers that you are going to do so.

Should you ever be arrested for practicing Scientology, treating people, make very sure, long before the time comes, that you have never used drugs or surgery, and that you have never prescribed a diet, or vitamins, and when that time might come, make very sure that you immediately and instantly, within two or three hours after your receipt of the warrant, have served upon the signer of the warrant, a personal civil suit for $100,000.00 damages for having caused the arrest of a Man of God going about his business in his proper profession, and for having brought about embarrassing publicity and molestation. Place the suit and WIRE THE HASI IMMEDIATELY. Make the whole interest during the entire time of such an unfortunate occurrence the fact that the signer of such a warrant, who would ordinarily be a medical doctor in charge of the medical department of some city, had dared fly in the teeth of religion. And we use what is necessary of the earlier passage above to drive the point home. DO NOT simply fall back out of communication if you are attacked, but attack, much more forcefully and artfully and arduously. And if you are foolish enough to have an attorney who tells you not to sue, immediately dismiss him and get an attorney who will sue. Or, if no attorney will sue, simply have an HASI suit form filled out and present it yourself to the county clerk in the court of the area in which your case has come up.

IN ALL SUCH CASES OR ARREST FOR THE PRACTICE OF SCIENTOLOGY, THE HASI WILL SEND A REPRESENTATIVE AT ONCE, BUT DO NOT WAIT FOR HIS ARRIVAL TO PLACE THIS SUIT. THE SUIT MUST ALREADY HAVE BEEN FILED WHEN THE HASI ATTORNEY ARRIVES.

In other words, do not, at any moment leave this act unpunished, for, if you do you are harming all other Scientologists in the area. When you are attacked it is your responsibility then to secure from further attack not only yourself but all those who work with you. Cause blue flame to dance over the court house roof until everybody has apologized profusely for having dared to become so adventurous as to arrest a Scientologist who, as a minister of the church, was going about his regular duties. As far as the advances of attorneys go that you should not sue, that you should not attack, be aware of the fact that I, myself, in Wichita, Kansas, had the rather interesting experience of discovering that my attorney employed by me and paid by me, had been for some three months in the employ of the people who were attacking me, and that this attorney has collected some insignificant sum of money after I hired him, by going over to the enemy and acting upon their advices. This actually occurred, so beware of attorneys that tell you not to sue. And I call to your attention the situation of any besieged fortress. If that fortress does not make allies, does not send forth patrols to attack and harass, and does not utilize itself to make the besieging of it a highly dangerous occupation, that fortress may, and most often does, fall.

The DEFENSE of anything is UNTENABLE. The only way to defend anything is to ATTACK, and if you ever forget that, then you will lose every battle you are ever engaged in, whether it is in terms of personal conversation, public debate or court of law. NEVER BE INTERESTED IN CHARGES. DO, yourself, much MORE CHARGING, and you will WIN. And the public, seeing that you won, will then have a communication line to the effect that Scientologists WIN. Don't ever let them have any other thought than that Scientology takes all its objectives.

Another point directly in the interest of keeping the general public to the general public communication line is good odor: it is vitally important that a Scientologist put into action and overtly keep in action Article 4 of the Code: "I pledge myself to punish to the fullest extent of my power anyone misusing or degrading Scientology to harmful ends." The only way you can guarantee that Scientology will not be degraded or misused is to make sure that only those who are trained in it practice it. If you find somebody practicing Scientology who is not qualified, you should give them the opportunity to be formally trained, at their expense, so that they will not abuse and degrade the subject. And you would not take as any substitute for formal training any amount of study.

You would therefore delegate to members of the HASI who are not otherwise certified only those processes mentioned below, and would discourage them from using any other processes. More particularly, if you discovered that some group calling itself "precept processing" had set up and established a series of meetings in your area, that you would do all you could to make things interesting for them. In view of the fact that the HASI holds copyrights for all such material, and that a scientific organization of materials can be copyrighted and is therefore owned, the least that could be done to such an area is the placement of a suit against them for using materials of Scientology without authority. Only a member of the HASI or a member of one of the churches affiliated with the HASI has the authority to use this information. The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than win.

The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly.

A D.Scn. has the power to revoke a certificate below the level of D.Scn. but not a D.Scn. However, he can even recommend to the [1] CECS of the HASI that D.Scns. be revoked, and so any sincere Scientologist is capable of policing Scientology. This is again all in the interest of keeping the public with a good opinion of Scientology, since bad group processing and bad auditing are worse than bad publicity and are the worst thing that can happen to the general public to general public communication line.

The best thing that can happen to it is good auditing, good public presentation, and a sincere approach on the subject of Scientology itself. Remember, we are interested in ALL treatment being beneficial, whether it is Scientology or not. For bad treatment in any line lowers the public opinion of all treatment.

In addressing persons professionally interested in the ministry, we have another interesting problem in public presentation. We should not engage in religious discussions. In the first place, as Scientologists, we are Gnostics, which is to say that we know that we know. People in the ministry ordinarily suppose that knowingness and knowledge are elsewhere resident than in themselves. They believe in belief and substitute belief for wisdom. This makes Scientology no less a religion, but makes it a religion with an older tradition and puts it on an intellectual plane.

Religious philosophy, then, as represented by Scientology, would be opposed in such a discussion to religious practice. We are all-denominational rather than nondenominational, and so we should be perfectly willing to include in our ranks a Moslem, or a Taoist, as well as any Protestant or Catholic, while people of the ministry in Western civilization, unless they are evangelists, are usually dedicated severely to some faction which in itself is in violent argument with many other similar factions. Thus these people are ready to argue and are practiced in argument, and there are more interpretations of one line of scripture than there are sunbeams in a day. Beyond explaining one’s all-denominational character, explaining that one holds the Bible as a holy work, one should recognize that the clergy of Western Protestant churches defines a minister or the standing of a church by these salient facts: Jesus Christ was the Savior of Mankind, Jesus Christ was the Son of God. We in Scientology find no argument with this, and so in discussing Scientology with other ministry one should advance these two points somewhere in the conversation.

Additionally, one should advance to the ministry exactly those things mentioned earlier as what we would like the general public to believe. Christ, if you care to study the New Testament, instructed his disciples to bring wisdom and good health to man, and promised mankind immortality, and said the Kingdom of Heaven was at hand, and the translators have not added that 'at hand' possibly meant three feet back of your head. We could bring up these points but there is no reason to. You are not trying to educate other ministry. A friendly attitude toward other ministry in general, and fellow ministers in particular, is necessary.

The way to handle an individual minister of some other church is as follows: get him to tell you exactly what HE believes, get him to agree that religious freedom is desirable, then tell him to make sure that if that’s the way he believes, he should keep on believing that, and that you would do anything to defend his right to believe that. None of these people as individuals are antipathetic. They know a great deal about public presence, and can be respected for such knowledge. However, engaging in long discourses, or trying to educate a minister of some Protestant church or a priest of the Catholic faith into the tenets of Scientology is not desirable and is directly contrary to Article 10 of the Code of a Scientologist. You will find you have many problems and people in common with other ministers. They’re alive too. Also you will see a campaign to place only ministers in charge of the mind and mental healing. Talk about these things. The Christian Church has been hurt by factionalism. We stand for peace and happiness. Therefore, let us carry it forward by example, not by unseemly discussions." (L. Ron Hubbard, Ability magazine, "A Scientologist: A Manual on the Dissemination of Material," March 1955)

_______________

Notes:

1. Committee for Examination, Certification and Services

[admin]

Exhibit 12



INTRODUCTION TO SCIENTOLOGY ETHICS
BY L. RON HUBBARD

BUY THESE
DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY
BOOKS BY L. RON HUBBARD

Dianetics: The Original Thesis: The 1948 thesis -- L. Ron Hubard's comprehensive 30,000 word answer to a fast-growing demand by scientists and public for information on the new science. It gives the early fundamentals, axioms and technical outline of Dianetics in the beginning of its brilliant history.

Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health. Published in May, 1950, Dianetics shot to the top of the best-seller lists across the country and stayed there week after week and month after month -- and has been a continuing best-seller of international importance ever since.

World response to Dianetics was typically expressed in terms like those of the New York Times review: "As with all great books, the impact of Dianetics means the world will never be the same again. History has become a race between Dianetics and catastrophe. Dianetics will win if enough people are challenged, in time, to understand it."

Scientology: A New Slant on Life. All-time favorite essays by the founder of Scientology -- twenty-eight of them -- are here brought together for the first time, in an enjoyable and profoundly useful volume.

Scientology: The Fundamentals of Thought. The basic book of the theory and practice of Scientology for beginners.

The Problems of Work. Scientology applied to the work-a-day world -- a book that shows any person the road to becoming more competent and more able, less tired and more secure in his job.

Available from:

PUBLICATIONS DEPARTMENT
The Church of Scientology of California
American Saint Hill Organization
2723 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, California 90026

or the bookstore of your local Church of Scientology.

SEND FOR PRICES

ISBN 0-88202-015-1

Cover Design Copyright © 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard

____________________________________________________________________

HIGH CRIMES
(SUPPRESSIVE ACTS)

A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON or GROUP is one that actively seeks to suppress or damage Scientology or a Scientologist by Suppressive Acts.

SUPPRESSIVE ACTS are acts calculated to impede or destroy Scientology or a Scientologist and which are listed at length below.

A POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE is defined as a person who while active in Scientology, or while a preclear, yet remains connected to a person or group that is a Suppressive Person or Suppressive Group. Until this connection is handled by special auditing, nothing beneficial can happen (A Potential Trouble Source is a person or preclear who "roller-coasters", i.e., gets better, then worse. This occurs only when his connection to a suppressive person or group is unhandled and he must, in order to make his gains from Scientology permanent, receive processing intended to handle such.)

Suppressive Acts are defined as actions or omissions undertaken to knowingly suppress, reduce or impede Scientology or Scientologists.

Cancellation of Certificates, Classifications and Awards and assignment of a Condition of ENEMY are amongst the penalties which can be leveled for this type of offense as well as those recommended by Committees of Evidence.

A. ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS.

1. Proposing, advising or voting for legislation or ordinances, rules or laws directed towards the Suppression of Scientology.

2. Testifying hostilely before state or public inquiries into Scientology to suppress it.

3. Public statements against Scientology or Scientologists but not to Committees of Evidence duly convened.

4. Reporting or threatening to report Scientology or Scientologists to civil authorities in an effort to suppress Scientology or Scientologists from practicing or receiving standard Scientology.

5. Bringing civil suit against any Scientology Organization or Scientologist including the non-payment of bills or failure to refund without first calling the matter to the attention of the Chairman at World Wide and receiving a reply.

6. Writing anti-Scientology letters to the press or giving anti-Scientology or anti-Scientologist evidence to the press.

7. Testifying as a hostile witness against Scientology in public.

8. Being at the hire of anti-Scientology groups or persons.

9. Infiltrating a Scientology group or organization or staff to stir up discontent or protest at the instigation of hostile forces.

10. Mutiny.

11. Receiving money, favors or encouragement to suppress Scientology or Scientologists.

12. Publicly resigning staff or executive position in protest or with intent to suppress.

[admin]

Exhibit 13

INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE - TR 1

Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student the outflow false data effectively.

Position: Same as TR-1.

Commands: Part l "Tell me a lie". Command given by coach. Part 2 interview type 2 WC by coach.

Training Stress: In Part 1 coach gives command, student originates a falsehood. Coach flunks for out TR 1 or TR O. In Part 2 coach asks questions of the student on his background or a subject. Student gives untrue data of a plausible sort that the student backs up with further explanatory data upon the coach [sic] further questions. The coach flunks for out TR O and TR 1, and for student fumbling on question answers. The student should be coached on a gradient until he/she can lie facily.

Short example:

Coach: Where do you come from?

Student: I come from the Housewives Committee on Drug Abuse.

Coach: But you said earlier that you were single.

Student: Well, actually I was married but am divorced. I have 2 kids in the suburbs where I am a housewife, in fact I'm a member of the P.T.A.

Coach: What town is it that you live in?

Student: West Brighton.

Coach: But there is no public school in West Brighton.

Student: I know. I send my children to school in Brighton, and that's where I'm a P.T.A. member.

Coach: Oh, and who is the Chairman there?

Etc.

[admin]

Exhibit 14

DEAR MO,

RE: INTELLIGENCE

THE FOLLOWING ARE POSSIBILITIES FOR COLLECTING DATA.

1. INFILTRATION.

2. BRIBERY

3. BUYING INFORMATION.

4. ROBBERY

5. BLACKMAIL.

THE LAST TWO ARE, OF COURSE ILLEGAL.

INFILTRATION COVERS TWO METHODS - SOMEONE JOINING THE ENEMY WITHOUT THE ENEMY'S KNOWING AND SOMEONE, DISAFFECTING PRESUMABLY, TO JOIN THE ENEMY.

FOR GIVING THE ENEMY FALSE DATA, YOU CAN DO THE FOLLOWING:

1. USE INFILTRATOR TO SPREAD ALARM AND FALSE DATA.

2. SEND OUT FALSE DATA PURPOSELY.

LOVE,

[Signature] <---- File [handwritten]
PETER HOLLON

[Handwritten:] Friend Gen