Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certification

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 2:07 am

Capitol riot fueled by deep network of GOP statehouse support: Stolen election lie had backing from party’s governing class at every level, extending far beyond Congress and the White House.
by David Siders
Politico
01/13/2021 04:30 AM EST

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
West Virginia House of Delegates member Derrick Evans is given the oath of office Dec. 14, 2020, in Charleston, W.Va. He resigned after the Capitol riot. | Perry Bennett/West Virginia Legislature via AP

One month before the riot at the Capitol, more than 60 Republican state lawmakers from Pennsylvania signed onto a letter urging the state’s congressional delegation to object to results of the presidential election. Across the border in Maryland, a Republican state legislator helped organize buses to take people to the protest that preceded the riot. A West Virginia lawmaker went even further, donning a helmet as he filmed himself rushing the Capitol.

As the Republican Party begins to reckon with the fallout from the deadly insurrection, it’s being forced to confront a disquieting truth: the lie that ultimately led to the violence — that the election was stolen from President Donald Trump — drew far-reaching support from the party’s governing class at every level, extending far beyond Congress and reaching deep into America’s statehouses.

Lawmakers from more than a dozen states attended the Jan. 6 rally, while scores more cheered on the “Stop the Steal” movement from afar. And in the days since the insurrection, these Republicans continued to question the election while giving air to debunked claims that antifa or other leftist agitators — not pro-Trump rioters — were primarily responsible for the destruction that followed.


“I wouldn’t trust a word that comes out of the FBI’s mouth at this point,” Mark Finchem, a Republican state representative from Arizona, said when asked about an FBI briefing of House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy that suggested no reason to believe antifa was involved.

Like many other Republican state lawmakers elected by pro-Trump Republicans who remain distrustful of the election, Finchem, who attended the rally but did not storm the building, said his job is to represent his constituents, and “if that means I need to fight off the establishment types, I’m good with that.”

One week after the deadly insurrection and the certification of Joe Biden’s victory, institutionalist Republicans are desperate to move the party past the events of last week. But in statehouses across the country, the prospect of a clean break has never seemed more remote.

In Nevada, newly elected Assemblywoman Annie Black, facing calls to resign after attending the rally preceding the riot, told her supporters, “I’m not going anywhere,” defending her attendance at an event she said was “marred by some fringe elements.” In Florida, state Rep. Anthony Sabatini on Tuesday was tweeting lists of Republicans “WITH courage” and those without, the latter group including Republican Sens. Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski, who have been critical of Trump. He called Rep. Liz Cheney, the Wyoming Republican who plans to support Trump’s impeachment, a “national security threat.”

Pat Garofalo, a Republican state representative from Minnesota, said that in the riot last week “there was a political epiphany for most Republicans that this is over, this is ridiculous … this is banana republic s---, we don’t do that.”

But even if “no one is standing up and saying that this was justified,” as Garofalo said, the idea that Trump had been robbed of the election was not far from home. Several of his colleagues had participated in a reportedly peaceful “Storm the Capitol” rally in Minnesota the same day the national Capitol was desecrated.

Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman said Wednesday that a state investigation of a Jan. 6 “Storm the Capitol” rally outside the state Capitol has ended without any finding of wrongdoing.

The Minnesota demonstration by supporters of President Donald Trump, with six Republican state lawmakers in attendance, happened at the same time that insurrectionists were attacking the U.S. Capitol on Washington.

No violence took place in St. Paul, but some participants cheered at news of the events in Washington, and one speaker warned of a civil war. And Gov. Tim Walz later revealed that his teenage son had been evacuated from the governor's residence.

Hortman, DFL-Brooklyn Park, announced Jan. 13 that the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension was looking into the demonstration. The BCA had concluded that speech at the event didn't go beyond protected free speech, Hortman said.

-- Speaker Hortman: BCA finds no wrongdoing in Jan. 6 Minnesota rally, by The Associated Press


For Republicans involved in promoting Trump’s claims about election fraud, the recriminations have been swift. Major corporate donors have announced they will withhold contributions from Republican lawmakers who objected to certifying the Electoral College votes last week. Facebook and Instagram permanently banned a top organizer of the “Stop the Steal” protest on Capitol Hill. One Republican group pledged to raise $50 million to help Republican lawmakers fend off potential primary challenges if they vote to impeach Trump, and as many as 10 Republican House members are reportedly considering doing just that.

But Trumpism was never primarily a feature of Washington, as state lawmakers who are attuned to their GOP constituencies know. A large majority of Republicans said after the election that they did not think it was free or fair, and fewer than one in five Republicans said after the riot last week that Trump should resign.

The physical violence represented a fringe element of the party. But the reason that Republicans were in Washington — loyalty to Trump, frustration with the election — is a fairly mainstream GOP position in many places. And so, too, is disbelief in the party’s culpability.

“I don’t know that widespread means it’s a majority opinion or a prevailing opinion, but there are certainly a significant number of Republicans who have fallen for the myth that this was some a antifa-instigated event, which it was not,” said Ron Nehring, a former California Republican Party chairman who served as Sen. Ted Cruz’s spokesman in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Nehring compared the moment for Republicans to one confronting the GOP in the 1960s, when William F. Buckley helped distance the party from racists and “kooks.” “Today, the same must be done again with adherents of QAnon and the Proud Boys and similar groups,” Nehring said.

Lamenting that “not enough Republican leaders have made clear that, ‘No, the election in fact was not stolen,'” he said, “I’ve spent 32 years in the Republican Party, and I’m not going to allow it to be defined by a bunch of racists and lunatics just because they put on a MAGA hat.”

There have been sanctions for elected officials present at the Capitol as the mob breached the building. Del. Derrick Evans, the West Virginia lawmaker who entered the Capitol, faces criminal charges and resigned. Maryland Del. Daniel L. Cox, who helped organize buses to the rally and who called Vice President Mike Pence a “traitor,” was rebuked by the state’s Republican governor, Larry Hogan. And Democrats in states across the country have appealed for Republicans who participated in any part of the rally to leave office, as well.

But Republicans are largely more accommodating of their ranks. In Arizona, Finchem said he’s been getting encouraging emails from around the country. He and other lawmakers who attended the rally are finding support in their own caucuses, as well.

In Alaska, where a Republican state lawmaker, David Eastman, has come under scrutiny for attending the rally and promoting claims about antifa, longtime state Sen. John Coghill regretted that rhetoric in American politics had reached a point where “people are accusing each other of inciting a riot.”

Like other Republicans, Coghill places blame for what he called a “revved up” political climate on Democrats as well as Republicans. Despite courts finding no evidence of widespread fraud, he said that in the absence of a more rigorous examination of the vote, “conspiracy theories, accusations, they can run rampant.”

The president and his allies filed 62 lawsuits in state and federal courts seeking to overturn election results in states the president lost, according to Marc Elias, a Democratic election lawyer who is tracking the outcomes.

Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.

Some cases were dismissed for lack of standing and others based on the merits of the voter fraud allegations. The decisions have came from both Democratic-appointed and Republican-appointed judges – including federal judges appointed by Trump.

State Supreme Courts in Arizona, Nevada and Arizona each rejected or declined to hear Trump’s appeals to overturn results in those states, while the Pennsylvania and Michigan supreme courts denied multiple lawsuits.

The 60th and 61st losses came in recent days.

Last Friday, a Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas dismissed a lawsuit from Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, that argued Vice President Mike Pence has the conditional power to decide which states' Electoral College votes to count.

On Monday, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by voters in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Arizona that argued state legislatures should have met after the election to certify votes.

The lone victory for the Trump team was a small one. A Pennsylvania judge sided with the Trump campaign, ruling that voters could not go back and “cure” their ballots if they failed to provide proper identification three days after the election. The ruling affected few votes and did not change the outcome in Pennsylvania, which Biden won by 81,660 votes.

-- By the numbers: President Donald Trump's failed efforts to overturn the election: Trump and allies filed scores of lawsuits, tried to convince state legislatures to take action, organized protests and held hearings.. None of it worked, by William Cummings, Joey Garrison and Jim Sergent, USA TODAY


Coghill, whose father was a signer of the state Constitution and who will leave the Senate next week after 22 years in elected office, said, “I think there’s enough blame to go on both sides.”

In the Republican Party’s base in the states, that view appears likely to have more currency than any interest in rooting out.

In Maryland, Del. Neil Parrott, called it “very unfortunate” that his colleague, Cox, was facing criticism for attending the rally.

“The vast majority of people were simply there to support fair elections,” said Parrott, who traveled to Pennsylvania to observe ballot counting after the election. “They had no idea that some people were going to try to take over the rally and make it violent.”

Parrott said that “party infighting is not going to help us now” and that, instead, “it’s time for Republicans to get back to the basics, like why do we care about less government, lower taxes, giving power back to the people.”

Likening the political options available to Republicans to sports, he said, “Sometimes your plays get too complicated, you need to go back to the basics.”

Matt Dixon contributed to this report.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 2:55 am

Alabama Coup Klutz Klan: Traitors Mo Brooks, Tuberville and company should resign
by J.D. Crowe | jdcrowe@al.com
Alabama (AL.com)
Updated Jan 11, 2021; Posted Jan 11, 2021

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
ALABAMA COUP KLUTZ KLAN
MO BROOKS; TOMMY TUBERVILLE; BARRY MOORE; ROBERT ADERHOLT; JERRY CARL; GARY PALMER; MIKER ROGERS
FOR INCITING AND SUPPORTING AN ATTEMPTED COUP, THESE TRAITORS NEED TO GO


This is an opinion cartoon.

For inciting and supporting an attempted coup, by failing to stand up against lies and misinformation from their Trump Lord, and for being spineless sycophants instead of leaders, these goober traitors should all resign. Or be dissolved by a stain remover.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:02 am

Hallmark asks Sens. Hawley, Marshall to return campaign contributions
by Tod Palmer
kssshb.com
Posted at 12:26 PM, Jan 11, 2021 and last updated 12:53 PM, Jan 12, 2021

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) questions Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz during a Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs hearing at the U.S. Capitol on Dec. 18, 2019, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Hallmark is asking Sens. Josh Hawley and Roger Marshall to return campaign contributions made by its political action committee in the wake of the deadly Capitol riot last week.

“Hallmark believes the peaceful transition of power is part of the bedrock of our democratic system, and we abhor violence of any kind,” the company said in a statement confirming the request. “The recent actions of Senators Josh Hawley and Roger Marshall do not reflect our company’s values. As a result, HALLPAC requested Sens. Hawley and Marshall to return all HALLPAC campaign contributions.”


Hawley and Marshall were among 147 members of Congress, all Republicans, who voted against certifying Electoral College electors from two states last Wednesday in the hours after rioters overran the Capitol after a Trump rally.

HALLPAC, which is Hallmark’s political action committee, donated $5,000 to Marshall’s campaign and $3,000 to Hawley's campaign, according to OpenSecrets.org.

Marshall, a Kansas Republican, defeated Barbara Bollier in November in one of the nation's most expensive and tightly contested races. He takes over retiring Sen. Pat Roberts’ congressional seat.

The company did not make a donation to Bollier’s campaign.

Hallmark said in its statement that HALLPAC “supports elected leaders from a wide variety of viewpoints—including Democrats, Republicans and Independents.”

The company contributed $95,500 to federal candidates in 2019-20 with nearly two-third, or $63,000, going to support Republicans.

HALLPAC also gave money to several other congress members who voted against certification of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory even after the proceeding last Wednesday were interrupted by the deadly riot that left five people dead.

Reps. Sam Graves ($6,000) and Vicky Hartzler ($2,000) of Missouri along with Reps. Ron Estes ($2,000), Tracey Mann ($2,000) and Jake LaTurner ($1,000).

All five representatives voted against certification of Arizona’s Electoral College electors and all except LaTurner, who tested positive for COVID-19 and was removed from the House Chamber, voted against certification of Pennsylvania’s electors.

The PAC contributed to three other representatives who voted against certification, Reps. Blaine Luetkemeyer ($5,000) and Bill Long ($1,000) of Missouri and Rep. Kevin McCarthy ($5,000), a California Republican and the House Minority Leader.

Additionally, HALLPAC, which has consistently spent more in support of Republican candidates since 1990, donated $5,000 to the Hawley Victory Committee, according to 2019-20 records.

Hallmark wouldn't say if it would ask any other candidates to refund donations, but said it was pausing donations as it reviews its policies.

"We have no additional comments beyond what we shared yesterday (Monday)," a company spokesperson said in a statement emailed Tuesday to 41 Action News. "HALLPAC is currently evaluating its giving policies and does not plan to make any contributions until that process is complete."

HALLPAC also gave $3,000 to former Rep. Steve Watkins, a Kansas Republican who LaTurner defeated during the August primary before winning the seat in November’s general election.

Hallmark’s PAC also donated to two Democratic lawmakers from the Kansas City area. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II of Missouri received $10,000, which was the largest donation made to any campaign, and Rep. Sharice Davids of Kansas received $6,000.

HALLPAC also contributed $2,500 to Rep. Ann Wagner, a Missouri Republican from the St. Louis area, who did not vote against certifying any Electoral College results.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:19 am

Talk radio company orders hosts to stop suggesting election was stolen from Trump
by Zack Budryk
The Hill
01/11/21 11:22 AM

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


A talk radio company that employs some of the nation’s most popular conservative radio hosts has issued a memo barring talent from spreading conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election.

“We need to help induce national calm NOW,” wrote an executive with Cumulus Media in a Wednesday directive, the same day as the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob, according to The Washington Post.

Brian Philips, the company’s executive vice president, went on to say Cumulus and its program syndication branch, Westwood One, “will not tolerate any suggestion that the election has not ended. The election has been resolved and there are no alternate acceptable ‘paths’. ”

“If you transgress this policy, you can expect to separate from the company immediately,” he added.

Cumulus hosts include Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro and Dan Bongino. Rush Limbaugh, who is broadcast on numerous Cumulus stations but syndicated by Premiere Networks, is not subject to the directive.


It remains to be seen whether hosts like Levin who have built a strong personal brand will abide by the memo and whether Cumulus would be willing to take major disciplinary action if they do not. As recently as Thursday, a day after the riot, Levin seemingly denied responsibility for inciting the unrest, saying: “I’m not stirring up a damn thing. Everything I say is based on principle and mission. Everything is based on liberty, family, faith, the Constitution. ... My enemies and my critics can’t say the same.”

Michael Harrison, the publisher of Talkers magazine, said the memo represented the corporate side of the talk radio industry pulling rank on on-air talent who often present themselves as independent from outside influence.

“Corporations have always called the tune ultimately,” he told the Post. “Everyone pays attention to the guys at the top and always has.”

Tech and social media companies have also clamped down on potential incitement in the wake of the riots. Twitter has banned President Trump’s account, as well as those of several leaders in the far-right QAnon conspiracy theory, heavily represented among the mobs.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:26 am

Prosecutors weigh ‘heavy hammer’ — felony murder — for rioters in Capitol officer’s death
by Neal Augenstein | @AugensteinWTOP
wtopnews
January 11, 2021, 7:19 AM

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


As federal prosecutors file charges against rioters who took part in last Wednesday’s violent takeover of the U.S. Capitol, investigators continue to gather evidence in the death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who died from injuries sustained during the attack.

While most murder investigations focus on the person or persons who caused the fatal injury, former federal prosecutor Tim Heaphy said prosecutors could charge many rioters with felony murder, even if they were nowhere near Sicknick.

Heaphy led the months-long investigation into the law enforcement performance before, during, and after the deadly 2017 white nationalist rally, in Charlottesville, Virginia. Heaphy was the U.S. Attorney for Western District of Virginia from December 2009 through January 2015, appointed by President Barack Obama.

Under the doctrine of felony murder, which applies in the District of Columbia, any murder that occurs during the commission of one of several underlying felonies is chargeable as felony murder.

“The classic example is if three guys go to rob a convenience store, and one guy is the getaway driver. If in the commission of the robbery, the clerk was shot and killed, all three of the participants in the robbery of the store are potentially guilty of felony murder,” said Heaphy.

On Jan. 6, hundreds of supporters of President Donald Trump broke through barricades and into the U.S. Capitol, as Congress worked to count the electoral votes to affirm President-Elect Joe Biden’s victory.

In the federal murder code, 11 underlying felonies which can be part of a felony murder charge are listed — one which could be applicable to the Jan. 6 takeover is burglary.

“You could look at the storming of the doors of the Capitol by that riotous mob as burglary. If they went in with the intent to steal, disrupt proceedings, to commit other offenses, they committed burglary. And, therefore, a murder that occurred during the course of a burglary could be potentially charged as felony murder,” Heaphy said.


The mere act of breaking into the Capitol doesn’t constitute burglary, Heaphy said. Prosecutors would need to prove that they intended to do something criminal, once they were inside.

“Let’s say somebody storms the Capitol with the intent to disrupt Congress, or steal the sign outside of Speaker Pelosi’s door, and there’s a murder that occurs in the midst of that, he could be charged with felony murder,” Heaphy said.

As with any crime, federal or state, prosecutors have to weigh whether charges can be sustained in court.

In this case, with the crimes committed on federal property, and in the death of a federal employee, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia — which prosecutes cases in both federal and local courts — would have the felony murder count at its disposal.

“That’s why it is such a friend to the prosecutor,” Heaphy said.

“It’s a pretty heavy hammer to charge accomplices, to charge aiders and abettors, who don’t necessarily intend to murder — if they’re going to engage in felonious conduct, they are potentially responsible for the consequences of that conduct, if death ensues.”

Asked whether Acting U.S. Attorney Michael Sherwin and Acting Principal U.S. Attorney Ken Kohl had ruled out filing felony murder charges in connections with Sicknick’s death, spokeswoman Shelia Miller said: “Since this is a pending death investigation, we cannot comment at this time.”

Prosecutors have not named any suspects in connection with the physical altercation that led to Sicknick’s death. A federal conviction for first-degree murder in the District of Columbia, unlike in D.C. Superior Court, is eligible for the death penalty.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:33 am

Donald Trump labelled a 'domestic terrorist' by former US deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage
by Myles Wearring
abc.net
Posted Monday 11 January 2021 at 12:51am, updated Monday 11 January 2021 at 2:26am

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
Former officials have voiced concerns about Donald Trump could do during his final days in office.(AP: Susan Walsh)

Former US deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage says he believes President Donald Trump is a "domestic terrorist" following last week's attack on the Capitol building.

Mr Armitage, a Republican who served in the George W Bush administration, told 7.30 he feared more violence.

"For me it started in Charlottesville when he said there were good people on both sides of the issue," Mr Armitage said, referring to clashes at a white supremacist rally in 2017 in which a counter-protester was killed.

"There was violence at those rallies and it's continued.

"And most recently when the President was firing up the crowd, and previously saying, 'it's going to be a wild day', then urging them to march on the Capitol.

"All those things lead me to believe that he's a domestic terrorist.


Image
Former US deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage says he fears more violence.(Reuters: Lee Jae-Won)

"And if you don't think that in some way is encouraging the next [Timothy] McVeigh — he was the man who was responsible for the [1995] Oklahoma bombing, since put to death — I think it'd be wrong.

"I'm not saying it will bring forth a McVeigh, but it's encouraging those who have those kinds of thoughts, I believe."


In the last few days a number of Republicans in Congress have called for Mr Trump to either stand down as President or face impeachment.

Democrats plan to initiate impeachment proceedings if Vice-President Mike Pence and the Cabinet do not remove Mr Trump from office.

Chuck Hagel says attack on Capitol was predictable

Image
Chuck Hagel is concerned about what Mr Trump might do in his final days as president.(Reuters: Kevin Lamarque)

Another former official speaking out against Mr Trump is former Republican senator Chuck Hagel, who served as US secretary of defence in the Barack Obama administration. He told 7.30 he was not surprised by the attack on the Capitol.

"I think it was predictable," Mr Hagel said.

"If you were just following the news, and following what was going on with the President and around the country, you could understand that something was going to happen, and it was probably going to be a very bad reaction and consequence of the President's inciting these people to come protest and riot and raise hell.

"And they did much worse."

Mr Hagel said he was concerned Mr Trump "could incite more domestic violence" in coming weeks.

Australian counter-insurgency expert David Kilcullen has been tracking the rise in America's armed militias and says the country is at a tipping point.


Image
David Kilcullen says the US is "at risk of a revolutionary moment."(ABC News)

"The real split in the US isn't between Republicans and Democrats, it's between those people who still think that electoral politics of a democratic type can have a role in fixing the nation's problems, and people who've basically given up on democracy altogether and are now thinking of armed solutions to these problems," Mr Kilcullen said.

"It's not too extreme to suggest that the US is in a pre-revolutionary or pre-insurgency state.


"I think that what happens in the next few weeks to months will determine where that goes, but we certainly are right now at risk of a revolutionary moment that could lead to mass unrest and violence."

Mr Hagel is also concerned about what Mr Trump could do on the global stage in his remaining time as President.

"Internationally he still has the powers to order the military to take certain actions. What if he decides to take action against Iran or North Korea, or attack an Iranian ship or North Korean ship?" Mr Hagel said.

"These things are extreme, I recognise, but I don't think you can underplay it.

"Don't underestimate it, especially this President in what we've seen of him and what he's capable of doing, not just in the last week but in the last four years."
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:58 am

After Twitter purges Nazis, conservatives complain their follower counts down: Wouldn't these be the followers you want to lose?
by David Covucci
Daily dot
Jan 11, 2021, 11:03 am* Tech

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image

It’s been a rough week to be a prominent Trump supporter. Your die-hard fan base committed insurrection against the government, your leader was stripped of the greatest online megaphone in human history, and all your alternative options for posting are getting swiftly shut down.

And to add insult to injury, as Twitter culls QAnon believers and neo-Nazis upset about censorship flee the site, your follower counts are dropping steadily.

Sure, there might terrorists plotting inside your party, threatening the unity and sanctity of American democracy like no time since the Civil War, but it appears the greatest concern for many in and around the Trump administration is that they have fewer people to reply to their tweets.

Image
Matt Gaetz
@mattgaetz
Started the day at 892k.
Currently 856k and dropping.
Brian Kilmeade@kilmeade
So I have actually lost 30k followers in 4 hours? Is that even possible? Parler iced? Is this to please @JoeBiden? Does he know what Twitter is?

10:57 PM Jan 8, 2021


Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), who continues to baselessly blame the Capitol violence on mythical antifa soldiers, lost nearly 40,000 followers.

QAnon-supporting Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) said she had 30,000 followers gone.


Image
Lauren Boebert
@laurenboebert
I've had 30k followers removed.
Even more crazy considering I've gained around 20k cancel culture trolls.
The Columbia Bugle @ColumbiaBugle
Replying to @ColumbiaBugle
Tucker Carlson: "They are in control now. Silicon Valley oligarchs are more powerful than the President of the United States & they want you to know it.

1:34 AM Jan 9, 2021


Secretary of State Mike Pompeo complained about the follower counts of a number of Republicans doing down in a graphic.

Image
Mike Pompeo
@mikepompeo
This is how you create an echo changer...
Kamala Harris
+95.8K Followers
Joe Biden
+61.1K Followers
Secretary Pompeo
-36.2K Followers
Kevin McCarthy
-41.3K Followers
Tom Cotton
-15.6K Followers
Mike Pompeo
-19.5K Followers
11:47 AM Jan 9, 2021


He noted that he, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ala.) lost followers during the last couple of days. Sarah Huckabee Sanders also complained, saying she lost 50,000. Others did as well.

Of course, in the wake of the Capitol riots, Twitter cracked down on a number of QAnon bots and promoters, and in the wake of President Donald Trump being banned, a number of right-wingers claimed to be ditching the site.

So as many people on Twitter noted: If you're losing those kinds of followers, wouldn't that be a good thing?

Image
Tauriq Moosa
@tauriqmoosa
Conservatives really telling on themselves when there's been a huge deletion of Neo-Nazi Twitter accounts and they whine about a radical drop in Followers.
AlterNet @AlterNet
AOC slams Sarah Sanders for complaining about losing 50,000 followers from Twitter's pro-Trump 'neo-Nazi' purge alternet.org/2021/01/aoc/

10:15 AM Jan 20, 2021


Image
Zac Petkanas
@Zac_Petkanas
You'd be losing fewer followers if you were followed by fewer Nazis, KKK members and QAnon terrorists.
Matt Gaetz @mattgaetz
Started the day at 892k.
Currently 856k and dropping. twitter.com/kilmeade/statu...

9:17 AM Jan 10, 2021


Image
Sarah Huckabee Sanders @SarahHuckabee Jan 9, 2021
I've lost 50k+ followers this week. The radical left and their big tech allies cannot marginalize, censor, or silence the American people. This is not China, this is United States of America, and we are a free country.
Mike Pompeo
@mikepompeo
This is how you create an echo changer...
Kamala Harris
+95.8K Followers
Joe Biden
+61.1K Followers
Secretary Pompeo
-36.2K Followers
Kevin McCarthy
-41.3K Followers
Tom Cotton
-15.6K Followers
Mike Pompeo
-19.5K Followers
11:47 AM Jan 9, 2021

Dave Millar
@davemillar71
Are...are you really complaining about losing followers who are a comb of:
1) racist
2) Nazi's
3) Bots
That's kind of a pretty terrible hill to die on.

8:12 AM Jan 11, 2021


While clearly not the most pressing matter of the day, it does appear to be the only thing Republicans want to talk about.

Update 11:02am CT: In a statement, Twitter responded to the accusations of follower losses, saying it was a standard audit.

Image
Twitter Support
@TwitterSupport
To clear up confusion about fluctuations in follower counts:
In order to prevent spam, we regularly challenge accounts to confirm details like email and phone number. Until that info is confirmed, these accounts aren’t included in follower counts.
Platform manipulation and spam policy
We want Twitter to be a place where people can make human connections, find reliable information, and express themselves freely and safely.
help.twitter.com

9:44 PM · Jan 8, 2021
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 4:23 am

Army investigates Fort Bragg officer’s involvement in DC rally [Captain Emily Rainey, 4th Psychological Operations Group at Fort Bragg]
by CBS News, Associated Press
Posted: Jan 11, 2021 / 08:28 AM EST / Updated: Jan 11, 2021 / 11:42 PM EST

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


CBS 17 has updated this story to reflect the officer’s resignation date.

FORT BRAGG, N.C. (CBS NEWS/AP) — The U.S. Army said it is investigating a psychological operations officer after she was with a group of people from North Carolina to the rally in Washington that led up to the deadly riot in the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump, CBS News correspondent David Martin reports.

Commanders at Fort Bragg said they were reviewing Captain Emily Rainey’s involvement in last week’s events in the nation’s capital, but she said she acted within military regulations and that no one in her group broke the law.

“I was a private citizen and doing everything right and within my rights,” Rainey told The Associated Press on Sunday.

Rainey said she led 100 members of Moore County Citizens for Freedom, which describes itself online as a nonpartisan network promoting conservative values, to Washington to “stand against election fraud” and support Trump.


Image
Emily Rainey in a photo from University of Scranton

She said the group attended the rally but she didn’t know of anyone who entered the Capitol and that they were headed back to their buses hours before an emergency curfew took effect.

Rainey, 30, is assigned to the 4th Psychological Operations Group at Fort Bragg, according to Maj. Daniel Lessard, a spokesman for 1st Special Forces Command. Known as PSYOPS, the group uses information and misinformation to shape the emotions, decision-making and actions of American adversaries.

Rainey submitted her resignation in October and her final separation date is in April.

Rainey made headlines back in May after she posted a video online of her pulling down caution tape at a playground that was closed under North Carolina’s COVID-19 restrictions.


Police in Southern Pines, a community about 30 miles west of Fort Bragg, charged her with injury to personal property over the incident.

In Washington on Wednesday, insurrectionists took over the House and Senate chambers, smashed windows and waved Trump, American and Confederate flags. The riot followed the rally where Trump repeated false claims that the election had been rigged against him and said he and his supporters are going to have to “fight much harder” to protect democracy.


New Video shows early breach of US Capitol during riots: Chaos at the U.S. Capitol

So far, at least 90 people have been arrested on charges ranging from misdemeanor curfew violations to felonies related to assaults on police officers, possessing illegal weapons and making death threats against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Rainey said that her group and most people who traveled to Washington “are peace-loving, law-abiding people who were doing nothing but demonstrating our First Amendment rights.”

Members of the U.S. military are permitted to take part in political organizations and events out of uniform. However, there are caveats. The Department of Defense directive prohibits active-duty servicemembers from sponsoring partisan organizations. It is unclear if Rainey’s participation with her group on Wednesday went against DOD policy.

Rainey said she attended the Trump rally while on leave and didn’t advertise that she was an Army officer. She said Sunday afternoon that her commanders had not inquired about her time in Washington, but she did not immediately respond to a subsequent inquiry about the Army’s investigation.

“I told my bosses before I went that I was going, and I told them when I got back,” she said.

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), who is an Iraq war veteran, tweeted Monday that Rainey “needs to be removed from her job.”
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 4:39 am

Watchdog asks for investigation into whether Rep. Mo Brooks incited riot with rally speech
by Zack Budryk
The Hill
01/11/21 08:41 AM EST

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


The liberal watchdog group Campaign for Accountability on Monday called for the Office of Congressional Ethics to open an investigation into whether Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) incited Wednesday’s deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol with a speech he made prior to rioters breaching the building.

In a letter, the group cites the conclusion of Brooks’s statement from the House floor Wednesday, which took place shortly before the siege of the Capitol.

“Today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass," Brooks said, adding, “Our ancestors sacrificed their blood, their sweat, their tears, their fortunes and sometimes their lives to give us, their descendants, an America that is the greatest nation in world history." He then asked the audience if they were “willing to do the same.”

The nonprofit watchdog cites Brooks’s comments in the letter, saying that it was "hardly surprising" that a mob of listeners responded to these comments by storming the Capitol.

“In light of these inflammatory calls for violent action, it is hardly surprising that listeners responded by descending on the U.S. Capitol and began to riot — using force to storm the building and prevent the Congress from carrying out its duty to count the Electoral College votes,” the letter states.

It goes on to accuse Brooks, the first House member to announce his objection to the Electoral College results, of potentially violating laws against incitement to riot, encouraging others to riot and aiding and abetting incitement of a riot.

It also claims that he may have “conspired with others, including President Trump, to use force” to prevent or delay the Electoral College certification.

The Campaign for Accountability further charges that Brooks breached House ethics rules regarding conduct that “reflects creditably on the House.”

“There can be no action that brings greater discredit to the House of Representatives than a member of Congress — who has sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution — inciting an angry mob to violently protest against the legitimate results of a democratic election,” the watchdog group wrote.


The letter from the group comes as a newspaper publishing in the Alabama district Brooks serves has called for his resignation.

The Decatur Daily, on Sunday, ran an editorial that called for the lawmaker to resign.

The editorial echoes Missouri and Texas newspapers that have called for the resignations of Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who led the charge for Senate objections to the Electoral College certification.

Since the riots, Brooks has paid tribute to Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who was killed in the riot, but has also used his Twitter account to promote unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that the rioters were actually antifa activists.

The Hill has reached out to Brooks’s office for comment.

*************************

CAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
611 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E. #337
Washington D.C. 20003
(202) 780-5750
campaignforaccountability.org

January 11, 2021

BY EMAIL: oce@mail.house.gov
Omar Ashmawy
Staff Director and Chief Counsel
Office of Congressional Ethics
U.S. House of Representatives
425 3rd Street, S.W. Suite 1110
Washington, D.C. 20024

RE: Request for Investigation of Representative Morris “Mo” Brooks

Dear Mr. Ashmawy:

Campaign for Accountability (“CfA”) respectfully requests that the Office of Congressional Ethics (“OCE”) investigate whether Representative Morris “Mo” Brooks (R-AL) violated federal law by inciting a riot as part of a seditious conspiracy to use force to prevent Congress from carrying out its constitutional and statutory duties to count the votes of the Electoral College.

Factual Background

On January 6, 2021, the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives met in joint session in accordance with the Twelfth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Electoral Count Act of 1887,1 to count the votes of the Electoral College and certify the election of Joseph R. Biden and Kamala Harris as the next President and Vice President of the United States.

Earlier that day, President Donald J. Trump and his allies, including Representative Morris “Mo” Brooks (R-AL), held a rally (the so-called “Save America March”) to urge President Trump’s supporters to march to the U.S. Capitol and use force to prevent Congress from carrying out its duty to count the votes of the Electoral College.

Representative Brooks was one of the speakers at the Save America March. His speech was carried live and broadcast nationally by the C-SPAN cable TV network.
2 His speech was largely devoted to attacking Republican members of Congress for carrying out their constitutional and statutory duty of counting the votes of the Electoral College and certifying the election of President-Elect Joe Biden. Rep. Brooks’ speech concluded with the following call to action to President Trump’s supporters:


Mo Brooks speech, part 1 (Stop the Steal / Save America March and rally)

Mo Brooks speech, part 2 (Stop the Steal / Save America March and rally)

Mo Brooks speech, part 3 (Stop the Steal / Save America March and rally)
Washington, DC 1/6/2021


America does not need and cannot stand, cannot tolerate, any more weakling, cowering, wimpy Republican Congressman and Senators who covet the power and prestige the Swamp has to offer while groveling at the feet and the knees of the special interest group masters.

As such, today is important in another way.

Today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass!

Now our ancestors sacrificed their blood, their sweat, their tears, their fortunes and sometimes their lives to give us, their descendants, an America that is the greatest nation in world history.

Are you willing to do the same?

My answer is yes!

Louder!

Are you willing to do what it takes to fight for America?

Louder!

Will you fight for America?
3


Following a similarly inflammatory speech by President Trump urging those congregated to “fight,” the people attending the Save America March began marching up Pennsylvania Avenue to the U.S. Capitol, where they and others stormed barricades erected by the U.S. Capitol Police, broke windows and pushed through doors to enter the Capitol Building, and then used force to try and gain entry to the chambers of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, where representatives and senators were debating an objection to the electoral college votes submitted by the state of Arizona. Both chambers had to be evacuated - temporarily achieving the rioters’ goal of preventing Congress from carrying out its constitutional and statutory duty to count the votes of the Electoral College.4

After the Members of Congress were evacuated, the rioters occupied both the Senate and House chambers, ransacking desks and offices in both bodies and destroying and stealing federal property.
The U.S. Capitol Police received reinforcements from the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police, the Secret Service, and the National Guards of the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia and eventually, the rioters were ejected from the Capitol Building and the grounds of the U.S. Capitol. The House of Representatives and the Senate reconvened later that day and completed the counting of the Electoral College votes in the early morning hours of January 7, 2021.5

The riot incited by President Trump and Representative Brooks, among others, resulted in five deaths, including the murder of a U.S. Capitol Police officer.6

Potential Violations

18 U.S.C. § 2101 (Riot)


Federal law makes it a crime for anyone to use any “any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television” to (1) incite a riot, (2) organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot, or (3) aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot.7

Representative Brooks’ speech to the Save America March was broadcast live on the C-SPAN cable TV network. In his speech, Representative Brooks told listeners that “Today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass!” He compared the listeners to America’s founding generation and asked them if they were willing to sacrifice their lives for America. He then continued to whip his audience into a frenzy by asking them – repeatedly - if they were willing to “fight” for America. In light of these inflammatory calls for violent action, it is hardly surprising that listeners responded by descending on the U.S. Capitol and began to riot – using force to storm the building and prevent the Congress from carrying out its duty to count the Electoral College votes.

Accordingly, by appearing on the C-SPAN cable TV network and exhorting his audience to use violence to stop the counting of the Electoral College vote, it appears that Representative Brooks may have violated 18 U.S.C. § 2101 by (1) inciting a riot, (2) encouraging others to participate in or carry on a riot, or (3) aiding or abetting others, including President Trump, in inciting a riot.


18 U.S.C. § 2384 (Seditious Conspiracy)

Federal law makes it a crime for two or more persons to conspire to use “force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States,” or to conspire to use “force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof . . . .”8

Here it appears that Representative Brooks may have conspired with others, including President Trump, to use force to “prevent, hinder or delay” the House of Representatives and the Senate from carrying out their duty to execute the law to count the Electoral College votes pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Electoral Count Act of 1887.9

In addition, by appearing with President Trump at the Save America March and exhorting his listeners to march to the U.S. Capitol and start “taking names and kicking ass,” Representative Brooks may have conspired with others, including President Trump, to use force to “seize, take or possess property of the United States” – the U.S. Capitol Building itself as well as its contents.


U.S. Constitution

Section three of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides, in part:

No Person shall be a Senator or Representative or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State who, having previously taken an oath. . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.


This prohibition, enacted in the wake of the Civil War, was crafted to keep both federal and state governments free of those who had torn the country apart. Here, if the OCE finds that by encouraging an angry mob to “fight”, Representative Brooks may have engaged in insurrection or rebellion, absent a twothirds vote of the House, he is disqualified from remaining in the House of Representatives.
 
Conduct Not Reflecting Creditably on the House

Rule XXIII of the House Ethics Manual requires all members of the House to conduct themselves at all times in a manner that reflects creditably on the House.10 This ethics standard is considered to be the most comprehensive provision of the code.11 When this section was first adopted, the Select Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of the 90th Congress noted that it was included within the Code to deal with flagrant violations of the law that reflect on Congress as a whole, and that might otherwise go unpunished.12 This rule has been relied on by the Ethics Committee in numerous prior cases in which the Committee found unethical conduct including: the failure to report campaign contributions,13 making false statements to the Committee,14 criminal convictions for bribery,15 accepting illegal gratuities,16 and accepting gifts from persons with interest in legislation in violation of the gift rule.17

There can be no action that brings greater discredit to the House of Representatives than a member of Congress – who has sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution – inciting an angry mob to violently protest against the legitimate results of a democratic election.

Conclusion

The potential violations here – incitement to riot and seditious conspiracy – are among the most serious crimes in the U.S. Criminal Code. Seditious conspiracy is literally a crime against democracy itself. In addition, the facts here are especially egregious. The riot at the Capitol resulted in the loss of five lives, including the death of a U.S. Capitol Police officer, the terrorization of countless members of Congress, congressional staff, journalists and members of the Capitol Police who feared for their lives as the mob patrolled the Capitol, as well as the destruction of federal property, including numerous historical artifacts. The American people’s faith in the ability of its government institutions to function has been shaken by some the very individuals elected to run the government.

If you determine that there is substantial reason to believe that Representative Brooks violated either 18 U.S.C. § 2101, 18 U.S.C. § 2384, or House Rule XXIII you should recommend to the House Ethics Committee that he be expelled from the House of Representatives.


Sincerely,

Michelle Kuppersmith
Executive Director

_______________

Notes:

1 U.S. Const., Amend. XII; 3 U.S.C. § 15.
 
2 See generally Rally on Electoral College Vote Certification, C-SPAN (January 6, 2021) (available at https://www.c-span.org/video/?507744-1/ ... tification 37:55).

3 Id.
 
4 See generally Mob Attack, Incited By Trump, Delays Certification, The New York Times (January 6, 2021)(available at https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/01/06 ... toral-vote).
 
5 See generally Marc Fisher, Megan Flynn, Jessica Contrera and Carol D. Leonning, The Four-Hour Insurrection - How a Trump Mob Halted American Democracy, The Washington Post (January 7, 2021)(available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics ... n-capitol/).
 
6 Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Riot, The New York Times (January 8, 2021)(available at https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/b ... -dies.html).
 
7 18 U.S.C. § 2101(a).

8 18 U.S.C. § 2384.
 
9 U.S. Const., Amend. XII; 3 U.S.C. § 15.

10 Rule 23, clause 1.
 
11 House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, House Ethics Manual, p. 12.
 
12 House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, Report Under the Authority of H. Res. 418, H. Rep. No. 1176, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 17 (1968).
 
13 House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, In the Matter of Representative John J. McFall, H. Rep. No. 95- 1742, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 2-3 (1978) (Count 1); In the Matter of Representative Edward R. Roybal, H. Rep. No. 95-1743, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 2-3 (1978).
 
14 House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, In the Matter of Representative Charles H. Wilson (of California), H. Rep. No. 95-1741, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 4-5 (1978); H. Rep. No. 95-1743(Counts 3-4).
 
15 House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, In the Matter of Representative Michael J. Myers, H. Rep. No. 96-1387, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 2, 5 (1980); see 126 Cong. Rec. 28953-78 (Oct. 2, 1980) (debate and vote of expulsion); In the Matter of Representative John W. Jenrette, Jr., H. Rep. No. 96-1537, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 4 (1980) (Member resigned); In the Matter of Representative Raymond F. Lederer, H. Rep. No. 97-110, 97th Cong., 1st Sess. 4, 16-17 (1981) (Member resigned after Committee recommended expulsion). In another case, the Committee issued a Statement of Alleged Violation concerning bribery and perjury, but took no further action when the Member resigned (In the Matter of Representative Daniel J. Flood, H. Rep. No. 96-856, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 4- 16, 125-126 (1980)).
 
16 House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, In the Matter of Representative Mario Biaggi, H. Rep. No. 100- 506, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 7, 9 (1988) (Member resigned while expulsion resolution was pending).
 
17 House Comm. on Standards of Official Conduct, In the Matter of Representative Charles H. Wilson (of California), H. Rep. No. 96-930, 96th Cong. 2d Sess. 4-5 (1980); see 126 Cong. Rec. 13801-20 (June 10, 1980) (debate and vote of censure).

***************************

Congressman Mo Brooks on House Floor Calls for Honest & Accurate Elections
by Congressman Mo Brooks
Press Release
January 7, 2021

Washington, DC— Wednesday, Congressman Mo Brooks (AL-05) gave an impassioned speech supporting honest and accurate elections by echoing Arizona Congressmen Gosar (AZ-04) & Biggs’ (AZ-05) opposition to certification of their own state’s electoral college submittal. Congressman Brooks’ speech focused on Democrat support of voting by noncitizens in American elections.

Full text of Congressman Brooks’ speech follows:

Madam Speaker, for years, Democrats and their media allies deceived America about Trump-Russian collusion and the extent of foreign interference in the 2020 election.

Yet, in 2020, Democrats promoted massive foreign interference in American elections by helping illegal aliens and other noncitizens vote in American elections, thereby cancelling the votes of, and stealing elections from, American citizens.

Want evidence?

Exhibit A. In 1993, Democrats rammed through Congress the National Voter Registration Act, making it illegal, illegal, to require proof of citizenship that prevents illegal aliens and noncitizens from registering to vote.[1]

Why did Democrats do that?

Simple. To steal elections, of course.

Exhibit B. How bad is the noncitizen voting problem?

In 2005, Democrat President Jimmy Carter’s Commission on Federal Election Reform warned that “Non-citizens have registered to vote in several recent elections” and recommended that “all states should use their best efforts to obtain proof of citizenship before registering voters.”

Exhibit C. A June 2005 General Accountability Office report discovered that up to 3 percent of people on voter registration lists are not U.S citizens.[2]

Exhibit D. In 2008, Electoral Studies surveyed 339 noncitizens. 8% admitted voting in American elections.[3][4]

As an aside, I have seen higher percentages in other studies.

Exhibit E. The 2010 Census counted 11 million illegal aliens in America.

Exhibit F. A 2018 Yale study estimated as many as 22 million illegal aliens in America![5]

Exhibit G. The math means between 880,000 and 1.72 million illegal aliens illegally voted in the 2020 elections.

Exhibit H. In 2014, Old Dominion University and George Mason University professors surveyed noncitizens and illegal aliens and found they vote Democrat roughly 80% of the time.[6]

Exhibit I. The math is again straight-forward. The 60% Biden advantage times the illegal alien voting number means Joe Biden gained roughly 1,032,000 votes from illegal alien voting. That's the high number.

Exhibit J. While no one knows for sure how massive the illegal alien voting block is, we do know Joe Biden and his campaign believed it large enough, and critical enough, to winning the presidential race that, at the October 22 Presidential Debate, Joe Biden publicly solicited the illegal alien block vote by promising, “Within 100 days, I’m going to send to the United States Congress a pathway to citizenship for over 11 million undocumented people.”[7]

Ladies and gentelemen, Madam Speaker, that is the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow for illegal aliens. Joe Biden knew exactly what he was doing by seeking the illegal alien block vote.

After all, on May 11, 1993, then Senator Joe Biden voted for the National Voter Registration Act that makes it illegal to require proof of citizenship from illegal aliens and other noncitizens when they seek to register to vote!

Madam Speaker, the evidence is compelling and irrefutable.

Noncitizens overwhelmingly voted for Joe Biden in exchange for the promised amnesty and citizenship and, in so doing, helped steal the election from Donald Trump, Republican candidates, and American citizens all across America.

Madam Speaker, in my judgment, if only lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens are counted, Joe Biden lost, and President Trump won, the electoral college.

As such, it is my Constitutional duty to promote honest and accurate elections by rejecting electoral college vote submissions from states whose electoral systems are so badly flawed as to render their vote submissions unreliable, untrustworthy, and unworthy of acceptance.

_______________

Notes:

[1] Kansas challenged this Democrat abomination by requiring “satisfactory evidence of United States Citizenship” before registering someone to vote. Kan.Stat.Ann. §25 S2309(l)). Unfortunately, two Democrat-appointed 10th Circuit Court of Appeals judges held the National Voter Registration Act voids Kansas’ common-sense, pro-America law. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/ap ... 04-29.html

[2] U.S. Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Requesters, “Elections, Additional Data Could Help State and Local Officials Maintain Accurate Voter Registration Lists.”, June 2005. https://cis.org/Report/NonCitizen-Voters; P. 42.

[3] “Do Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. Elections?” by Jesse T. Richman, Gulshan A. Chattha, and David Earnest. Elecctoral Studies, December 2014, Pages 149-157. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 9414000973

[4] Ibid. In 2020, Electoral Studies estimated that between 14,679 and 50,058 noncitizens voted in Arizona.

[5] https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/ ... -estimates
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Trump lashes out at Gov. Doug Ducey following certificat

Postby admin » Wed Jan 27, 2021 5:03 am

Kimberly Guilfoyle Speech "Save America March"
by Kimberly Guilfoyle
January 6, 2021

admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

PreviousNext

Return to United States Government Crime

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests