New WikiLeaks emails show more negative remarks against Bern

Re: New WikiLeaks emails show more negative remarks against

Postby admin » Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:29 am

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22224

This email has also been verified by Google DKIM 2048-bit RSA key

Re: Bernie's negativity

From: re47@hillaryclinton.com
To: mkeefe@hillaryclinton.com
CC: john.podesta@gmail.com, jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, creynolds@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2015-11-19 15:20
Subject: Re: Bernie's negativity

I see no downside to them talking to him

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Maura Keefe <mkeefe@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>
> Spoke to Shaheen yesterday who said she and Claire were talking about
> Bernie going negative. I asked her if she thought some of the women
> might be inclined to speak to him about it. She thought they would be.
>
> Let me know if there's interest in pursuing as another way to
> reinforce that he's running a negative campaign. Recognizing that
> conversation would likely get out and could become a part of the
> narrative against him - that the women senators went to him to ask him
> to tone it down and to keep the pledge he made to them at the start of
> the race...

> Sent from my iPhone
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 24271
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: New WikiLeaks emails show more negative remarks against

Postby admin » Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:54 am

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44131

Re: Friendly advice. No mercy.

From: Joel@gpg.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2016-02-22 01:56
Subject: Re: Friendly advice. No mercy.

Obama betrayer (Wh will affirm). Hapless legislator (Senators/members will affirm). False promiser (policy elites will affirm). Can't win (black people will affirm).

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 21, 2016, at 10:48 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com<mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com>> wrote:

I agree with that in principle. Where would you stick the knife in?

On Sunday, February 21, 2016, Joel Johnson <Joel@gpg.com<mailto:Joel@gpg.com>> wrote:

Bernie needs to be ground to a pulp. We can't start believing our own primary bullshit. This is no time to run the general. Crush him as hard as you can. Other than that, hope all is well and congrats on Nevada!

Sent from my iPhone
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 24271
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: New WikiLeaks emails show more negative remarks against

Postby admin » Thu Dec 08, 2016 11:11 pm

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4274

This email has also been verified by Google DKIM 2048-bit RSA key

Re: Tax hit for Chris Hayes

From: dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com
To: jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com
CC: balcantara@hillaryclinton.com, gruncom@aol.com, jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, kschake@hillaryclinton.com, bfallon@hillaryclinton.com more
Date: 2016-01-11 19:55
Subject: Re: Tax hit for Chris Hayes

agree

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com
> wrote:

> This is good.

> On Jan 11, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Betsaida Alcantara <
> balcantara@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>
> h/t to Mandy for edits.

> *SURCHARGE ON MILLIONAIRES*

> *Tell me about YOUR new tax proposal.*
>
> · As you know Chris, right now, the super-wealthy and big
> corporations use every trick in the book to game the system and avoid
> paying billions of dollars in taxes. It’s not right.
>
> · So today, I proposed adding a new “fair share surcharge” on
> multi-millionaires and closing loopholes to make it harder to game the
> system. (I’m also pushing for the Buffett Rule, which sets a minimum rate
> for those at the top, and other reforms like closing the carried interest
> loophole that allows some hedge fund managers to pay a lower rate than
> teachers or a nurses.)

> · I’m proposing every idea I can to finally make those at the top
> actually pay their fair share.

> · That’s going to be a big difference in this campaign. When you
> look at what the Republican candidates are proposing – it’s
> unbelievable. Trillions of dollars in new tax breaks to those at the
> top. Trickle down economics all over again.

> · On the Democratic side, I am the only candidate who has
> committed to raising middle class *incomes*, not middle class taxes.

> *How is this different from what other Democrats are proposing. They tax
> the rich too, right?*

> · Well, I am the only candidate who has proposed a surcharge on
> multimillionaires and the only one committed to NOT taxing the middle class.

> · Senator Sanders, Governor O’Malley, and I share a lot of the
> same values and goals. But we *do* have differences.

> · I’m a progressive who likes to get things done. I’ve laid out
> how I’m going to pay for everything I’m proposing.

> · I’m concerned that Senator Sanders has taken a different
> approach. His agenda would add 18 to 20 trillion dollars in new federal
> spending, but he hasn’t explained how he’d pay for it. That’s a big risk,
> because it’s hard to make the arithmetic add up any other way than a big
> tax increase on middle class families. I don’t think that’s the right
> choice .

>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> I am fine on the substance but this seems a little long and a little hard
>> to say in conversation. Do I have a few minutes to edit for you?
>>
>> *Mandy Grunwald*
>> *Grunwald Communications*
>> *202 973-9400 <202%20973-9400>*

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>
>> To: Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>
>> Cc: Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>; John Podesta <
>> john.podesta@gmail.com>; Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>;
>> Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>; Robby Mook <
>> re47@hillaryclinton.com>; Christina Reynolds <
>> creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>; Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>;
>> Betsaida Alcantara <balcantara@hillaryclinton.com>
>> Sent: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 4:03 pm
>> Subject: Re: Tax hit for Chris Hayes
>>
>> Should we add the 1.62 a week line Podesta suggested?
>>
>> Small thing but, I might say "he hasn't been able to show how he's gonna
>> pay for it" rather than explained because didn't they put out a whole chart
>> showing how they pay?
>>
>> Otherwise I'm good.
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Jennifer Palmieri <
>> jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think this is good.
>>
>> Plus Betsaida.
>>
>> *From:* Dan Schwerin [mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2016 3:50 PM
>> *To:* John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Jake Sullivan <
>> jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>; Jennifer Palmieri <
>> jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Kristina Schake <
>> kschake@hillaryclinton.com>; Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>;
>> Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com>; Christina Reynolds <
>> creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>; Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>
>> *Subject:* Tax hit for Chris Hayes
>>
>> HRC is going to call into Chris Hayes' show this afternoon to do her tax
>> hit.
How does this look to you guys?
>>
>> · Right now, the super-wealthy and big corporations are using every
>> trick in the book to game the system and avoid paying billions in taxes.
>> It’s wrong, and it’s bad for our economy. We can’t have one tax system for
>> those at the top and another one for everyone else.
>>
>> · So today, I proposed adding a new “fair share surcharge” on
>> multi-millionaires and closing loopholes to make it harder to game the
>> system. I’m also pushing for the Buffett Rule, which sets a minimum rate
>> for those at the top, and other reforms like closing the carried interest
>> loophole that allows some hedge fund managers to pay a lower rate than a
>> teacher or a nurse.
>>
>> · When it comes to taxes, there’s a clear choice in this election.
>> Republicans candidates are promising huge new giveaways to the wealthiest
>> Americans. And on the Democratic side, I am the only candidate pledging to
>> raise middle class incomes, not middle class taxes.
>>
>> · You know, Senator Sanders, Governor O’Malley, and I share a lot
>> of the same values and goals. We both want to make the economy work for
>> everyone, not just those at the top. And the differences between us pale
>> compared to what we see on the other side. But we *do* have
>> differences.
>>
>> · I’m a progressive who likes to get things done. I measure every
>> policy by whether it’s going to actually make life better for working
>> families. And I’ve laid out how I’m going to pay for everything I’m
>> proposing by making the wealthy pay their fair share.
>>
>> · Senator Sanders has a different approach. His agenda would add
>> 18 to 20 trillion dollars in new federal spending, but he hasn’t explained
>> how he’d pay for it. That’s a big risk, because it’s hard to make the
>> arithmetic add up any other way than a big tax increase on middle class
>> families. I don’t think that’s the right choice when incomes for most
>> people have barely budged in years.
>>
>> · I like and respect Senator Sanders quite a lot, but I’m concerned
>> that some of his ideas run the risk of hurting rather than helping. So I
>> look forward to debating these differences in the campaign.

> Betsaida Alcantara | Communications
> Hillary for America
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 24271
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: New WikiLeaks emails show more negative remarks against

Postby admin » Thu Dec 08, 2016 11:20 pm

Hillary Clinton with Chris Hayes
1/11/2016

https://streamable.com/80bl
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 24271
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Previous

Return to Wikileaks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest