by Amanda Bronstad
Law.com
September 01, 2022 at 06:06 PM
https://www.law.com/therecorder/2022/09 ... 1011024100
NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
** A bankruptcy trustee says that California Attorney Lending II’s $6.7 million claim should be disallowed or, at the very least, bumped to the end of the line of hundreds of creditors.
** The trustee is investigating whether funders knew about Tom Girardi’s $25 million in fraudulent transfers to his estranged wife, Erika Girardi.
** The lawsuit, citing a possible crime, says California Attorney Lending II never returned $1.7 million from the Lion Air settlements, despite $2 million in missing client funds.
One of Girardi Keese’s largest litigation funders had an “insider” role in managing the now-defunct Los Angeles firm’s financial affairs in the years before it imploded: arranging agreements with other financiers, illegally splitting fees and refusing to return stolen settlement funds—a possible crime.
That’s according to a new lawsuit filed on Wednesday by the trustee of the Girardi Keese bankruptcy against California Attorney Lending II, one of four litigation financing firms that have claims totaling $28 million. The trustee, Elissa Miller, says that California Attorney Lending II’s $6.7 million claim should be disallowed or, at the very least, bumped to the end of the line of hundreds of creditors whose losses total nearly $500 million.
California Attorney Lending provides financing for every major plaintiffs' firm practice area, including mass torts, personal injury cases and class actions. Our extensive in-house experience in civil litigation gives us the unique ability to understand your firm's business goals irrespective of the type of cases your firm handles.
-- CaliforniaAttorneyLending.com
California Attorney Lending II, the lawsuit says, “knew or should have known that there were irregularities involving Girardi Keese’s trust accounts and yet it continued to support Girardi Keese’s operations by providing referrals (fees split 50-50) and funding Girardi Keese’s ongoing business operations.”
The lawsuit also names affiliate Counsel Financial Services LLC and California Attorney Lending II owner Joseph DiNardo.
William F. Savino, of Woods Oviatt Gilman in Buffalo, New York, who represents California Attorney Lending II, did not respond to a request for comment.
DiNardo’s attorney, Richard Scherer, of Lippes Mathias in Buffalo, New York, wrote in an email: “Mr. DiNardo has not yet been served with the complaint filed by the trustee, but denies any wrongdoing and will aggressively defend this litigation.”
Miller, of Greenspoon Marder in Los Angeles, has been investigating whether Girardi Keese’s funders knew about Tom Girardi’s $25 million in fraudulent transfers to his estranged wife, Erika Girardi, a probe that a bankruptcy judge sanctioned earlier this year when approving her request for special counsel. Lawyers for California Attorney Lending II and two other Girardi Keese funders, Stillwell Madison and Virage SPV 1 LLC, which also have claims against the bankruptcy estate, objected to the trustee’s investigation.
The new lawsuit adds more details about Girardi’s fraud, including misappropriating what the trustee estimated was now $14 million in client settlement funds. Girardi used one client account, the suit says, as a “personal piggy bank,” depositing more than $41 million to cover checks he wrote over seven years to “support his lavish lifestyle.”
The lawsuit, which has attached emails between California Attorney Lending II and Girardi Keese, reveals a relationship beyond that of law firm and funder. At one point, California Attorney Lending II took over negotiations with the law firm’s other lenders and had fee-sharing agreements with Girardi Keese, unbeknownst to the client, that violated California’s Rules of Professional Conduct, the suit says.
The relationship began in 2005 when Girardi Keese was working with New York’s Weitz & Luxenberg on mass tort litigation over the painkillers Bextra, Celebrex and Vioxx. California Attorney Lending II, the suit says, would refer cases for a 50% cut in fees.
The lawsuit claims Weitz & Luxenberg founding partners Perry Weitz and Arthur Luxenberg, neither of whom is named in the lawsuit, are owners of California Attorney Lending II, alongside DiNardo.
Weitz & Luxenberg’s Gary Klein said Weitz and Luxenberg declined to comment about the lawsuit.
In 2011, California Attorney Lending II provided a $5 million loan to Girardi Keese after negotiating the transfer of cases from bankrupt Masry & Vititoe, the firm made famous from the 2000 movie “Erin Brockovich.” California Attorney Lending II now has an $8.7 million unsecured claim tied to those cases.
In 2018, California Attorney Lending II became more directly involved in Girardi Keese’s financial affairs. To keep the law firm afloat, DiNardo insisted hiring Robert Cohan, of Simba Capital, as its chief restructuring officer, while he helped renegotiate agreements with other lenders.
“The emails evidence that DiNardo had assumed complete control of the negotiations regarding various workout scenarios, and was the only person engaged in those discussions on behalf of Girardi Keese, save and except for input by Cohan,” the suit says.
Elissa Miller of Greenspoon Marder. Courtesy photo
In fact, the suit continues, Girardi Keese already was insolvent by the time the first lawsuit was filed over the 2018 crash of Lion Air 610 in Indonesia. Yet Girardi Keese represented 22 families in that litigation, which Boeing settled in 2020.
At least $2 million of the Lion Air settlements remained missing later that year, when a federal judge issued a contempt order against Girardi and his firm, freezing their assets. The trustee’s lawsuit says Girardi and California Attorney Lending II, under a fee-sharing agreement that violated court orders, had instructed Boeing to wire the firm’s entire $3.5 million fee to the funder.
California Attorney Lending II later reduced its share to half the fees but never returned $1.7 million from those settlements, even though clients were owed $2 million and Girardi Keese’s co-counsel, Edelson, hadn’t been paid $2.5 million in fees, the trustee’s lawsuit says.
Keeping that money “constitutes a crime under California law,” the suit says.
Edelson, earlier this year, filed a racketeering lawsuit that names California Attorney Lending II, as well as two former Girardi Keese partners, the law firm’s former bookkeeper, a consultant and Erika Girardi. Although the racketeering allegations don’t specifically target California Attorney Lending II, the lawsuit alleges the funder had access to Girardi Keese’s books and records and received money from the Lion Air settlements.
Savino, at the time, called Edelson’s lawsuit “truly offensive” and a “smear campaign.”