Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

"Science," the Greek word for knowledge, when appended to the word "political," creates what seems like an oxymoron. For who could claim to know politics? More complicated than any game, most people who play it become addicts and die without understanding what they were addicted to. The rest of us suffer under their malpractice as our "leaders." A truer case of the blind leading the blind could not be found. Plumb the depths of confusion here.

Re: Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

Postby admin » Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:24 am

Chapter 13: Ptech, 9/11 and the Financial Collapse

P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, and all of this is unraveled. ... All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the S&L’s, looting of the banking’s all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play.
– Indira R. Singh

On 9/11 the world witnessed a horrific terror spectacle when the World Trade Center was bombed and demolished into a pile of rubble in broad daylight. The murderous demolition of the twin towers is an unprecedented event in world history. The terror attacks of 9/11 and the financial crisis that exploded onto the world scene in September 2008 are similar and connected. The similarity between the two events that occurred almost exactly seven years apart reveals the criminal network behind both events and their methods.

The terror bombings of 9/11 are related to the financial collapse of 2008 and involve many of the same criminal elements.

What we know about the destroyed towers is that they had recently come under the complete control of two Zionist Jews -- Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando fighter, Frank Lowy. With the connivance of fellow Zionist Jews, these two active and dedicated Zionists obtained the leases, with borrowed funds, for the Twin Towers at the end of July 2001 and had them insured them to the hilt – including anticipated future earnings – against a terror attack precisely like the one that occurred six weeks later on 9/11, when they hit the jackpot, blood and all.

The three towers that were demolished on 9/11 were all owned or leased by Larry Silverstein, a dedicated Zionist and former strip club owner turned real estate mogul.

Frank Lowy (right), a former Israeli commando, and his son are close friends of Rupert Murdoch (center), a fellow Australian Zionist Jew and owner of FOX News and News Corporation. Lowy was Silverstein's partner in leasing the World Trade Center, a lease that was funded by the Zionist-run -- and now bankrupt -- GMAC, the financial branch of General Motors. Silverstein and Lowy obtained the World Trade Center lease six weeks before 9/11 and made several billion dollars on its destruction.

The security of the Twin Towers was in the hands of a Zionist firm and had been since 1993. That company was under the control of Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll. The first plane that struck the World Trade Center homed in on a secure computer room in the northeast section of the North Tower. The plane went directly into the computer room of a company named Marsh that was run by Greenberg's son. What a coincidence.

Michael Chertoff, an Israeli-American orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist, headed the criminal division of the Department of Justice from 2001 to 2003. From this position, Chertoff -- whose mother was an Israeli intelligence agent -- supervised the non-investigation 9/11 and destruction of crucial evidence.

Michael Chertoff, an Israeli citizen and son of the Mossad, was responsible for the destruction of the evidence from the World Trade Center.

The Zionist-controlled media promoted the preposterous and unproven theory that Osama Bin Laden and his twenty hijackers had carried out the attack from their headquarters in Afghanistan. The United States went to war against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan based on unproven allegations and false evidence as the real evidence of mass murder was furtively being shipped to various Asian ports where it was destroyed in the furnaces of steel mills.

Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy received huge pay-outs from the insurance companies. The American people and U.S. taxpayers were left with a pile of incredibly hot rubble and an immense price tag which grew with the passage of time. Seven years later, to the day, two pillars of the financial world collapsed in a strikingly similar fashion. These two columns were Lehman Brothers bank and the American International Group (A.I.G.), managed and controlled for decades by Maurice R. Greenberg.

Like the twin towers, these companies were thought to be too large to collapse, but collapse they did. By September 11, 2008, these companies seemed to be in a state of free fall. Investors pulled their money and global panic ensued. Like the Twin Towers, both Lehman and A.I.G. were Zionist-controlled organizations.

The federal systems of corporate financial security, enforcement, and investigation were also under Zionist control. Despite repeated warnings, indictments, and violations of the law by A.I.G., the heads of the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank called for the U.S. taxpayer to bail out these corrupt and criminal enterprises. The key player in this huge and historic bailout was Ben Shalom Bernanke, a dedicated Zionist who spent summers working for a well-known Jewish criminal who controlled elections in Dillon, South Carolina.

Maurice Greenberg, the disgraced head of the criminal A.I.G. and chairman and CEO of C.V. Starr & Co., Inc., testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on "The Collapse and Federal Rescue of A.I.G. and What It Means for the U.S. Economy" in Washington, D.C. on April 2, 2009. The Securities and Exchange Commission accused Greenberg of numerous improper accounting moves between 2000 and 2005. The false accounting amounted to more than $5 billion and resulted in A.I.G. paying more than $1 billion in fines. In August 2009 Greenberg was personally fined more than $130 million in a lawsuit filed on behalf of defrauded workers in Ohio. Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, a devoted Zionist, will go down as one of the greatest criminals in history. (UPI Photo)

An immense amount of taxpayer money, some $180 billion, has been poured into the financial black hole known as A.I.G. This is roughly equivalent to taking $600 from every man, woman, and child in the United States and using it to prop up (or absorb the losses of) the criminal and fraudulent financial/insurance structure operated by Maurice Greenberg.

The profits made by Lehman Brothers and A.I.G. have gone into private offshore accounts, while the debts and obligations have been passed on to the U.S. taxpayer. These companies were looted and plundered and then allowed to collapse. Once again, the rubble and costs were forced upon the American people against their will. The American public was 1,000-to-1 against the Zionist bailout.

The fact that the first plane that hit the World Trade Center flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh, a company run by Maurice Greenberg's son Jeffrey, is just one of the obvious connections between these two catastrophic events. Ptech's dodgy enterprise software is another.

The first plane nosed right into the secure computer room of Marsh, a Greenberg-owned company, as if guided by a homing device inside the tower. The unusual bursts of white smoke and light orange flame that accompanied the explosions from the Marsh computer room suggest that the room had been loaded with Thermate.

In the previous chapter, the key role of Ptech enterprise software was discussed. The person who first brought public awareness to the Ptech problem was a "risk architect" named Indira R. Singh, who lived near the World Trade Center and was working with JP Morgan Chase on 9/11. Singh is very knowledgeable about Ptech and what such enterprise software can do.

My research found that one of the key people involved in the founding of Ptech was a Jewish lawyer from Worcester, Massachusetts, named Michael S. Goff. Goff's father and grandfather had both been highest level Freemasons in the Zionist secret society of B'nai B'rith. Michael was Ptech's first marketing manager and all-around general director in 1994, according to his own published statements about his role with the company. He was responsible for all hiring, training, and procurement for the company.

Goff went on to work for Guardium, an Israeli enterprise software company founded and headed by individuals from Israeli military intelligence. As I explain in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9/11," one of the founders and directors of Guardium is Gill Zaphrir (a.k.a. Zafrir), an Israeli colonel who "headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force." Goff was working for Zaphrir's Guardium in 2005 when I discovered his role in founding Ptech.

Col. Gill Zaphrir headed the R&D Department of the Israel Air Force.

Singh doesn't say anything about Goff at Ptech, but that is understandable. This Israeli connection is something I discovered in 2005 and it has not been discussed by the mainstream media. It is unlikely that anybody else would have told Singh about Goff's key role in building Ptech in the mid-1990s. Furthermore, Israelis are generally seen as allies of the United States.

Understanding the role of Ptech's dodgy enterprise software and the connection between Ptech and Israeli military intelligence requires reading my articles about Ptech and Mitre. With this Israeli conection to Ptech in mind, I recommend reading "The Story of Indira Singh" from an interview she did in April 2005. This is one of the most informative and least biased interviews she has done. It's rather long, but well worth reading for anyone interested in understanding 9/11 and the financial crisis. This interview also contains some interesting testimony about the downing of Flight 93 and the mysterious demolition of the forty-seven-story WTC 7, which was the third tower owned by Larry Silverstein.

Singh's comments about Ptech and her work at JP Morgan shed a great deal of light on how this Ptech enterprise software may have played a role in both 9/11 and the financial meltdown. I recommend reading the entire interview. To give an idea of what Singh discusses, I have provided some of the most interesting extracts below.

Extracts from "The Story of Indira Singh" from Our World in Balance, April 27, 2005:

Indira Singh has been working on Wall Street since 1975. On 9/11 she was working as a senior consultant for JP Morgan Chase. She was tasked with developing a next-generation, operational, risk-blueprint which would proactively identify exposures, including money laundering, rogue trading, and illicit financing patterns. It was in this capacity nine months later, [that] she became aware of the biggest threat to our country, a trans-nationally protected terrorist cartel that brought us 9/11. Indira Singh is a private pilot and a climber. Prior to 9/11, she volunteered as a civilian emergency medical technician, until she was injured at ground zero.

They [the Twin Towers] were mysterious international structures that were the center and the heart of our Western Civilization, basically.
- Indira Singh

Singh: September 11th I was a senior consultant for JP Morgan Chase and Risk. I had cycled through several of their Risk areas as an enterprise architect, or an information architect, technology architect… which basically means that you take a look at the entire enterprise and come up with a blueprint, make sure that all the systems, not just one system, but all the systems, the blueprints for all the systems that are developed to support the business, are in-line, in tune with the business goals and the business architecture and the business processes and where the business is going. So it’s pretty high-level, we call it the CXO level, or the Chief Information Officer, Chief Technology Officer levels and there are disciplines and methodologies and very esoteric software that’s used to manage this. I did that at JP Morgan Chase and I also worked for a small company in Washington, D.C. that was doing some very innovative work regarding technology interoperability, they were developing some inference engines to think about how to put technology architectures together and I wanted to use that for my risk work, basically. …we were seeking funding from In-Q-Tel, which was the CIA’s information technology seeking arm, I had been spending pretty much every Friday, Thursday-Friday down in D.C. trying to get that project off the ground, and trying to get it funded ...

Singh: P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on, and all of this is unraveled. Because it goes into the corporations, it goes into these government entities, it goes into the terrorism financing entities… none of which have been taken to task… there are just so many questions about what does this all mean? And as I investigated further, we found that the origins of P-Tech were very interesting. Where did this company come from? Obviously, that is the first question. And how did they get to be so powerful? Who were the people, who were the organizations that brought them in who knew, who gave them the power? ...

Singh: BMI was identified as being involved with terror financing, but this is just not going to be, ‘The Muslims Hate America!’, that’s not what it is, there is something else going on here, they’re being used as a tool, just as the good people of the U.S. are being used, are being misled, and frightened and terrorized into, ‘if we don’t wage these horrific wars, our way of life will be over’. Who benefits? ...

Singh: The FBI. In fact, this has to be made very clear, there are some extraordinarily real patriotic Americans, and good people in the FBI, as has been said by Colleen Rowley, one of the FBI whistleblowers, there’s a wall in the FBI. And this has been validated to me by various in Houston who are very close to the power bases and are pretty ticked off at what’s happening in this country and are speaking out. As are many CIA agents who are very concerned that it has gone too far, as are many NSA agents who are concerned that it has gone too far, and FBI agents. So we have a lot of people who are speaking out, they have kept quiet too long, they’re afraid, they are afraid of what’s happening to this country …

Singh: Ari Fleischer spun it to find sugar that day. He said, ‘There’s nothing wrong. Nothing to see here, everything’s fine.’ So they did a token raid and that was basically it. But everything that I have done since that time has been for one reason and one reason only, that there may come a time, that people will find the trail to P-Tech, and it won’t be hidden or buried, I’ve kept it alive, whether they’ve renamed their company and moved on I want to keep the names, the details, everything alive, no matter what I have to do, so that, should there come a time for justice and accounting for 9/11, and for what’s happening in the world today, it makes it easier for other people to unravel the truth… Whatever you’re political inclinations, this is wrong. This is criminal, this is murder, this is worldwide atrocity. And I have reached some very good people on the left and on the right, who are willing to speak out about P-Tech. ...

Singh: It was possible that there was an alternate command and control system. Could you technically use P-Tech software to do the surveillance and intervention? Well, gosh, yes, that’s exactly what I was planning on using it for in one of the largest banks in the world. ...

Singh: The Towers came down, 3,000 people were killed, and what I know is the characters behind the funding of it, were totally in bed with characters in the U.S. And not only just for 9/11, but going on through our nation’s history, and the big question is, “Why?” What are they up to?

Question: Could you describe the relationship of P-Tech with the FAA? P-Tech worked with the FAA for several years, didn’t they?

Singh: It was a joint project between P-Tech and Mitre, and they were looking at holes, basically in the FAA’s interoperability, responding with other agencies, law enforcement, in the case of an emergency such as hijacking. So they were looking for… what people would do, how they would respond in case of an emergency, and find the holes, and make recommendations to fix it. Now, if anyone was in a position to know where the holes were, P-Tech was. And that’s exactly the point. If anybody was in a position to write software to take advantage of those holes, it would have been P-Tech. ...

Singh: Now, with the FAA in particular, if something goes wrong, and there is an emergency with a particular flight, and the DOD needs to be notified, well that’s a really major interoperability thing, a signal has to be sent in some way, shape or form, either mediated by a human in most cases, or automatically, or even if its mediated by a human something needs to be initiated on a separate computer to start a whole other sequence of events, interventions, scrambling a jet, notification up and downstream with many other organizations, such as NORAD, such as other terminal radar areas, such as local law enforcement, you name it. So, this all has to be blueprinted, mapped out, and that’s where Enterprise Architecture comes in, you need some kind of blueprint to keep all of this together and that’s what P-Tech was so good at.

Question: Now was there a reference to P-Tech having operated in the basement, out of the FAA?

Singh: Yes. Now, typically, because the scope of such projects are so overarching and so wide-ranging, when you are doing an enterprise architecture project, you pretty much have access to how anything in the organization is being done, where it’s being done, on what systems, what the information is, and you pretty much have carte blanche. Now if it’s a major project that spans several years, the team that comes in has literally access to almost anything they want because you’re operating on a blueprint level, on a massive scale. So, yes, they were everywhere, and I was told that they were in places that required clearances, I was told they had log-on access to FAA flight control computers, I was told that they had passwords to many computers that you may not on the surface… let’s say you… isolated part of a notification process that was mediated by a computer, and you wanted to investigate it further, then you typically get log-on access to that computer, and from that back upstream or downstream, so, who knows? In my experience, I could have access to almost anything I wanted to in JP Morgan Chase… and didn’t, for the reason if anything went wrong, I didn’t wanna have the access. But if you were up to no good, as an enterprise architect, with such a mandate, you typically could have anything you wanted. Access to anything. ...

Singh: But there were 4 war games, 4 simulations going on the morning of 9/11, and I just want people to remember that the whole nature of what Mitre, they also developed software for intelligence, which includes the CIA, Mitre and P-Tech would have, if they were going to test whether they had fixed these holes, would have probably run a simulation. I don’t know that they did, but that’s how we do things, but there were 4 of them going on. So was there room for confusion? I don’t think these people were stupid, I think they were deliberately confused, if anything.

Q. Well we know very well that there was a simulation of the very event taking place during the event.

Singh: And I believe there is proof there was more than one. Just in case the first one didn’t confuse people enough. So what does this say? I can be very objective about this and say, “Well, the terrorists knew that there were war games scheduled for this day and they took advantage of it and called 9/11 a particular day, however, we do know that 9/11 had been selected prior… ok, so maybe the war games were set many weeks prior for 9/11…” and you can play this game over and over and over. Yes, it was the perfect day, and yes, you needed inside knowledge, and yes, P-Tech with all its myriad associations would have had the inside knowledge, and yes, P-Tech was a CIA front, and yes, P-Tech was protected. ...

Singh: Interestingly enough, I did not let people know that it was P-Tech until maybe August, 2002 at ICH… we had pretty much moved on and uh, I accidentally let slip to one of my colleagues there that the name of the company that was being investigated was P-Tech. And she was horrified… she said, “They’re everywhere.” And I said, “Yeah, fancy that. Wonder who put them there.” ...

Singh: Before P-Tech was ever raided, before it ever became public, I took it all the way up to the top of the FBI. I took it everywhere. The reality of the situation is proven by the response I got there. More telling than the actual deed itself. Their response to that is really what indicts them all.

Q. What was their response?

Singh: Uhm, “Shut up and go away, or you will be killed.” Basically.

Q. Now, you got that response from all different levels in government …

Singh: I got that response from JP Morgan. I got that response from P-Tech. I got that warning from people within the FBI. Mostly the FBI …

Q. And what kind of response did you get from JP Morgan Chase, your employers at the time when you went to them with what you had found out about P-Tech?

Singh: Well, they had told me that I should be killed for getting all this evidence… I was intimidated. I wrote a letter to my boss saying that I had been intimidated, and the person who had intimidated me, the 3rd highest ranking person in the bank, the General Auditor, so this has gone all the way up to the top, they were very aware of it, and that they were going to deny using P-Tech at JP Morgan Chase. In fact they would even explicitly deny the URL to the website, so that no one could even look into them. Now the name has changed, so you wonder what is going on there, but, when he asked me, ‘where did you get this from and that from?’, I was basically thoroughly intimidated. They treated me as though I was the bad guy. That’s what happened. They treated me as if I was the bad guy for having dug up all of this stuff.

Q. And you were told by the Chief Auditor at JP Morgan Chase that the different individuals that you had gotten this information from should have been killed?

Singh: Yeah… I pointed down the street, I said, “I lost people there.” And he said, “I lost people there, too. Look, look, this is about 9/11… I put it in a folder named 9/11…” and it got pretty ugly from that point on. Basically he said that, “He needed to be sure that I would never mention P-Tech again.” And I said, “Here’s the problem. I’m a senior consultant, I consult with a lot of people… you may deny P-Tech business here… what happens to Citibank, what happens to Goldman-Sachs, what happens to the rest?” He said, “That’s not my problem.” And I said, “That’s why we have that hole in the ground up the street. It is everyone’s problem.” ...

Singh: All of this stuff took money to fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering, and looting, looting of the SNL’s, looting of the banking system, what we’re in the middle of now which is the looting of Social Security. And this is all being done, the looting of HUD, it’s all being done systematically to keep the slush funds up for the game at play.

Q. Where do you think this is headed?

Singh: Not any place good for people. And it isn’t just going to be America, it is going to be global.


Sources and Recommended Reading

"The Story of Indira Singh", Our World In Balance, April 27, 2005 ... singh.html

Original - March 13, 2009
Latest Edit – June 22, 2011
Site Admin
Posts: 26007
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

Postby admin » Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:33 am

Chapter 14: Game Over: Evidence of Super-Thermite in the Rubble

The red-gray chips of super-thermite found in the dust of the pulverized World Trade Center.

"The evidence for active, highly energetic thermitic material in the WTC dust is compelling...these data suggest that the thermitic material found in the WTC dust is a form of nanothermite, not ordinary (macro-) thermite."
- "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," Dr. Steven E. Jones et al, March 2009

One of the most significant events in the search for the truth of 9/11 was the publication in March 2009 of a peer-reviewed scientific paper, written by nine scientists, about the discovery of "active thermitic material" in dust samples from the collapsed towers of the World Trade Center. A twenty-five-page scientific paper entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" presents physical evidence that an extremely powerful form of super-thermite was used to demolish the twin towers.

The research paper written by an international team nine scientists led by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University analyzes red-gray chips of a highly-explosive thermitic material "characterized as nano-thermite or super-thermite," which was found in dust samples from the collapsed towers. The paper was published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal and marks a historic breakthrough in the scientific investigation of the explosive collapses of the Twin Towers, although it has not been widely covered by the media outside of Salt Lake City. If we had a truly free press in the United States this important discovery would be front page news and a subject of discussion on every news outlet in the nation.

Super-thermite is a highly energetic form of thermite (iron oxide and aluminum) in which at least one component is in the extremely fine or nano-size range with particles 100 nanometers (1 nm = 1 billionth of a meter) or smaller, often along with silicon and carbon. Super-thermite is an extremely powerful explosive that releases much more energy per gram than any other conventional explosive used in demolition. The chips found in the World Trade Center dust were an extremely powerful form of super-thermite.

The pyroclastic dust clouds of 9/11 were created by a sophisticated form of super-thermite that was combined with an organic compound to create explosive gas pressure.

Two of the chips tested released more energy by mass (kJ/g) than HMX, TNT, TATB explosives or normal thermite. These chips released between 50 to nearly 100 percent more energy than the four conventional explosives. One of the chips released twice as much energy per gram than Xerogel, a similar super-thermite nanocomposite, and the chips all ignited at 430 degrees C., 100 degrees lower than the ignition temperature for Xerogel.

The Jones paper proves that the official explanation for the explosive destruction of the Twin Towers is false. For 9/11 truth seekers, this paper is crucial because it means we can no longer be dismissed as "conspiracy theorists." We now have solid evidence of the advanced super-thermite that was used to demolish the twin towers. For the real terrorists of 9/11 and their supporters, the writing on the wall is clear. It says, "Game Over!"

The discovery of the active thermitic material is critical to understanding what really happened on 9/11. This scientific discovery reveals that sophisticated demolition explosives had been applied to interior surfaces of the Twin Towers long before the two planes struck. Although we already had evidence that the towers were demolished with thermitic explosives, this is the first time we have actual fragments of the explosives involved in the demolition and pulverization of the Twin Towers.

This crucial discovery is not front-page news in the United States only because our "free press" is actually very tightly controlled. But the truth cannot be so easily controlled. Americans now live in an uncomfortable conflicted state in which verifiable scientific evidence proves that our leaders are complicit in the criminal cover-up of what really happened on 9/11. This is the state I have been in since September 2001.

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was all grins during a community meeting in Los Angeles on May 15, 2009 until two 9/11 truth activists asked him about the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center. Presented with the paper by Steven E. Jones and eight other scientists Biden gave a terse one-word response and retreated to his security cordon. The truth of 9/11, however, will not be as easy to avoid.

The evidence that Jones and his team examined was in the form of very small fragments found in five different samples of dust from the pulverized Twin Towers. In each sample they found small chips of a coating that was composed of two layers, a red layer and a gray layer. The gray layer consisted mostly of iron oxide, while the red layer contained iron, oxygen, aluminum, silicon, and carbon -- all the components of super-thermite. The analysis and testing of the red and gray chips revealed that the super-thermite composite ignited at the surprisingly low temperature of 430 degrees Celsius and caused an explosive reaction which resulted in iron spheroids, exactly like thermite. In other words, the heat-producing explosive reaction created temperatures hotter than 1400 degrees Celsius, the melting point of iron.

The U.S.G.S. survey of the dust found large amounts of iron-rich spheres that were evidence that molten iron had accompanied the destruction of the World Trade Center. Nothing in the government version of the collapse of the Twin Towers explains the large amounts of molten iron found in the rubble. Thermite does.

The Jones paper concludes:

The small size of the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as nanothermite or super-thermite...Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.


Super-thermite, which has been fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and other places, can be sprayed or even “painted” onto surfaces, effectively forming an energetic or even explosive paint, the study pointed out. “The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces," scientists from Lawrence Livermore wrote in a 2002 paper entitled "Energetic nanocomposites with sol-gel chemistry: Synthesis, safety, and characterization."

"The red chips we found in the WTC dust conform to their description of 'thin films' of 'hybrid inorganic/organic energetic nanocomposite'," the Jones paper says. "Indeed, the descriptive terms 'energetic coating' and 'nice adherent film' fit very well with our observations of the red-chips which survived the WTC destruction."

The published documentation of evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center has taken the 9/11 truth movement to a new level. If Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida did not spray super-thermite in the Twin Towers, who did?

It is now evident that a sophisticated form of super-thermite had been applied to large sections of the World Trade Center. It may have been applied as a spray coating inside the wire ducts that ran through the floors or to the undersides of the floor pans under the guise of fire-proofing or some other form of building maintenance. Super-thermite is safe to handle and only becomes dangerous when it is dry.

We need to find out who manufactured this nano-composite thermite and who applied the coating of super explosive inside the buildings. This certainly must have been a task that involved a team of men working for weeks, if not months, and their presence must have been observed by security and other personnel involved in maintaining the buildings. Finding the source of the super-thermite and identifying the people who applied it to the Twin Towers will reveal the true culprits of 9/11.

Several years ago, I contacted Burton Fried, president of LVI Services, Inc., a demolition company that reportedly had done extensive "asbestos abatement" work in the twin towers. I considered LVI's work in the twin towers as suspicious because the company is primarily known for asbestos abatement and preparing structures for demolition. LVI has also done millions of dollars of research and development for the U.S. Department of Defense. In 2000, for example, shows that LVI Group, Inc. received $3.246 million worth of contracts with the U.S. Army, of which $2.967 million was for "Applied Research and Exploratory Development." It should be noted that the military is the main user and developer of super-thermite.

Burton Fried of LVI

LVI has also worked closely with Controlled Demolition Inc. on large demolition projects. LVI's role in these projects is reportedly preparing the structure for demolition prior to the placement of charges. LVI advertises that it sets up "turn key" demolition projects. Is this the kind of work LVI did at the World Trade Center? Although Mr. Fried denied having done the extensive "asbestos abatement" work in the towers as reported in Engineering News-Record on September 13, 2001, Debra Rubin, one of the journalists who wrote the piece, confirmed that the source of this information had been LVI. Fried's quick reaction, "I didn't do it," only increased my suspicions.

What happens now depends on what the people do with this information about what really destroyed the towers on 9/11: The three buildings that collapsed were not brought down by the fires caused by the burning fuel of two airliners; they were demolished with pre-planted explosives, including large amounts of an extremely potent form of super-thermite, which had been applied to surfaces of the building in the months prior to 9/11. Osama Bin Laden and his gang of twenty certainly did not spray super-thermite throughout the towers of World Trade Center in the weeks and months before 9/11 – so who did?

What we have to do as concerned citizens with moral courage seeking the truth of what really happened on 9/11 is to spread this information to our local news media and ask them to publish the information about this crucial discovery. We also have to bring this discovery to the attention of our local politicians, representatives, and senators in the U.S. Congress. We the people have to use our power to force this issue to be discussed in the media and the halls of power. It is time for us to stand up against those who have hijacked the truth about 9/11.


Bollyn, Christopher, "Super-Thermite Demolished TwinTowers on 9/11: Game Over for Criminals and Cover Up," April 14, 2009

Bollyn, Christopher, Did LVI Work in the TwinTowers Before 9/11? March 20, 2005

Bollyn, C., "Super-Thermite Found in World Trade Center Dust," April 5, 2009

Harrit, Niels H. et al, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Volume 2, 2009, ISSN: 1874-4125, pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen

Harrit, Niels, Interview with Danish scientist and co-author of paper on evidence of super-thermite in the WTC dust, TV2 News, Denmark, April 6, 2009

Rubin, Debra, and Richard Korman and Gary Tulacz, "Industry Firms Pitch in for World Trade Cleanup While Others Account for Employees in Doomed Buildings," Engineering News-Record, September 13, 2001

Original - April 5, 2009
Latest Edit – June 23, 2011
Site Admin
Posts: 26007
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

Postby admin » Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:45 am

Chapter 15: The Destruction of the Evidence

The explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers pulverized all 220 concrete floors leaving nothing but steel and dust. The dust contained large amounts of molten iron and a sophisticated form of thermite made using nanotechnology. Thermite creates molten iron when it reacts.

"The concrete was literally pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust," said Robert Kelman of Hugo Neu about the rubble of the World Trade Center. Because the remaining steel could reveal how the Twin Towers were destroyed, the architects of terror had set up a secure network to destroy this crucial evidence before it could be examined.

"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."
—Dick Cheney, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006

For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China, perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy your next car. … The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.
- Bill Manning, “Selling Out the Investigation”, Fire Engineering, January 2002

My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse…It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that.
- Van Romero, explosion expert, “Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says”, Albuquerque Journal, 11 September 2001


The terror atrocity of 9/11 is a wicked criminal deception that is not meant to be solved, which is why sincere efforts to solve the crime, like mine, encounter such vicious opposition. 9/11 is a textbook example of an elaborate criminal deceit known as "false-flag terrorism" in which the perpetrators designed the crime and spent years preparing the atrocity with the intention that a targeted group, in this case Osama Bin Laden and his nebulous band of Islamic fighters, Al Qaida, would be wrongly blamed. In an act of false-flag terrorism, placing the blame on the targeted entity is the primary motive for the crime. For an act of false-flag terrorism to succeed it is essential that crucial evidence be removed and destroyed to protect the fraud, and the criminals behind it, from being exposed. The destruction of the evidence and the promotion of the deception are intrinsic parts of the crime. The people behind the destruction of the 9/11 evidence are equal partners in crime along with the terrorists who planned and executed the attacks.

The main purpose of the 9/11 terror spectacle was to shock and scare the nation in order to swing public opinion behind supporting the preplanned Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" and the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. In the aftermath of the terror atrocity the unproven assertion that Al Qaida was behind the attacks became political dogma, the unchallengeable "party line" of both parties – and the controlled press. Although there were clearly a number of serious problems with the explanation that Al Qaida was behind the attacks, such as the unexplained explosive demolitions of the three towers at the World Trade Center, these issues were never discussed in the mainstream media. By ignoring the many unanswered questions about 9/11 the masters of the controlled media sought to marginalize those who pointed out the glaring problems with the “politically correct” explanation that blamed Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida.


The real masterminds of 9/11 designed the attacks to be a shocking spectacle of terror that would profoundly affect the American psyche and change the general perception of the Middle East. In order to scare the public and subjugate reason to fear, the architects of terror employed the psychological warfare tactic known as “shock and awe.” The explosions that accompanied the aircraft crashing into the towers and the apocalyptic scenes of the buildings' collapses were meant to create frightening images of “Islamic terrorism” to be seared into the consciousness of every American.

The 9/11 attacks employed a tactic of psychological warfare known as "Shock and Awe."

The attacks had to be seen as being the work of Arab Muslim terrorists in order for the terror deception to succeed and achieve the desired effect on public opinion. It was essential that the blame be put on the targeted scapegoat as quickly as possible to preclude any serious doubts or questions being raised about who was behind the atrocity. Getting the interpretation desired by the terror masterminds to the global public required having “terrorism experts" such as Ehud Barak, the Israeli commando leader-cum-prime minister, ready in a BBC television studio in London immediately after the attacks to present a plausible explanation blaming Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida - and calling for U.S. intervention in Afghanistan. The Israeli military chief's interpretation, the first to accuse Osama Bin Laden, was bolstered by bits of incriminating evidence such as the pristine passport of an alleged Arab hijacker “found” near the rubble of the World Trade Center and a terrorist handbook on how to hijack airplanes supposedly left behind in one of the terrorists’ rental cars.

Although the government collected all the evidence from the 9/11 crime scenes, including confiscated video tapes, black boxes, pieces of the aircraft, and human remains, it has never presented any evidence to identify the aircraft or support its assertion that Al Qaida was responsible for the attacks. It was, therefore, based on nothing more than fabricated evidence, but with the controlled media and public opinion solidly behind him, that President George W. Bush invaded Afghanistan in October 2001.

If the government had real evidence that would conclusively prove its case for waging war, why has it not presented the evidence in a federal court after 10 years? The only logical explanation for this failure is that the government does not have any solid evidence to support its allegations. Vice President Dick Cheney admitted as much in an interview with Tony Snow on 29 March 2006: "We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming." It has been argued that Cheney made a slip of the tongue, but it is a fact that not a single piece of evidence linking Osama bin Laden to 9/11 has ever been presented.

If the attacks were truly carried out by Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida there would be no reason to hide any of the evidence because it should serve to corroborate and confirm the official version. If, on the other hand, 9/11 was a false-flag terror deception it would be absolutely imperative for the perpetrators to confiscate and destroy any evidence that could disprove their interpretation of events and expose their fraud.

This is exactly what happened when, for example, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) confiscated video recordings from privately-owned cameras overlooking the Pentagon. These video tapes have never been shown to the public. Likewise, the FBI collected many numbered aircraft parts which could identify the specific plane they came from, yet none of these parts has ever been presented to support the official version. The failure of the government to use the evidence in its possession to prove its version suggests that the aircraft used in the 9/11 attacks were not the planes that are said to have been involved.

Why has the FBI not presented the numbered parts from this engine that would identify the specific aircraft it came from?

Understanding that 9/11 is an act of false-flag terrorism is the first step in comprehending the nature of the crime and identifying the real perpetrators. This is not an easy task because it requires thinking counter-intuitively about the crime and looking at it from a completely different angle than how it has been explained by the government and controlled media. This is very difficult for people who have a great deal of trust invested in what the government and media say. It also means understanding that the criminal cover-up and destruction of evidence continued long after the attacks.

Finding those responsible for the destruction of the evidence requires investigating a most unlikely set of suspects, including current and former officials of the U.S. government, law enforcement, and military, and ascribing to them criminal behavior quite unlike what one would expect of such people. This means recognizing that the highest officials in the Department of Justice, for example, whose obligation it was to investigate the crime and prosecute those responsible, actually oversaw the confiscation and destruction of crucial evidence.

A proper criminal investigation has to begin with and proceed from the evidence. Any inquiry that does not examine and consider all the evidence is not an investigation, but a fraud. Rather than a federal investigation of 9/11, there was a "non-investigation" that allowed crucial evidence, such as the structural steel from the World Trade Center, to be destroyed before it could be examined. Instead of solving the crime and bringing those responsible to justice, people in positions of power participated in a criminal conspiracy to destroy the evidence and obstruct justice.

One of the clearest indications that 9/11 was an act of false-flag terrorism is that during the first ten years after the attacks not a single victim's lawsuit went to trial, although peripheral “terrorist” cases that did not require proving the official version were tried. Likewise, although the government claimed to have Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged "Mastermind of 9/11" in detention, in April 2011 the Obama administration abruptly reneged on its promise to try the 9/11 suspects in an open court and announced that the accused terrorists would be processed in a closed military tribunal in Guantanamo, Cuba.

If the government had evidence that could prove the veracity of its charges, why has it obstructed justice and refused to let a single 9/11 lawsuit go to trial? For years after the attacks government officials defended the concealment of the evidence saying that pending lawsuits required such secrecy, but after ten years there still has not been a trial to determine who was really responsible for the attacks and there is scant hope there ever will be.

Alvin K. Hellerstein, the federal judge in Manhattan who has overseen the 9/11 litigation, has effectively blocked any trial for the relatives that would address the question of culpability for the terror attacks that changed America – and the world. In a judicial war of attrition against the families of the 9/11 victims, all of the families, with only one exception, were pushed into accepting out-of-court settlements, which prevent them from being part of any further litigation. The family of 9/11 victim Mark Bavis is the last family standing of the nearly 100 families that chose to litigate to determine who is responsible for 9/11 rather than accept the government payout. Judge Hellerstein has stated that he intends to severely limit the time allowed for the Bavis family lawyers to only 50 hours, a most unusual and arbitrary limit to be imposed on a trial of such importance.


Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.
- George W. Bush, at the United Nations, 11 November 2001

The "guilty", according to the U.S. government: A U.S. "Psy-Ops" pamphlet from Afghanistan. Similar psychological operations blaming Osama Bin Laden for 9/11 and pushing fear over reason were carried out on the U.S. population.

The Bush administration's explanation that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida were responsible for the 9/11 atrocity led directly to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan on 7 October 2001. The invasion was authorized by a joint resolution of the U.S. Congress on 14 September 2001, opposed by only one representative. The war resolution, known as "The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists", granted President Bush the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups. Although the U.S. has been at war in Afghanistan since October 2001, it has never actually been proven that Al Qaida was responsible for the attacks.

The controlled media and government officials who protected and promoted the unproven version that Al Qaida carried out the attacks are all part of the 9/11 deception. Cognizant that the government and media were deceiving the public about what really happened on 9/11, I pursued my quest to identify the real perpetrators of the terror spectacle that brought us the "War on Terror" – and a decade of deception and war.


According to the U.S. indictment against the alleged terrorists, there were 2,976 "murder victims" on 9/11, of whom about 93 percent were murdered at the World Trade Center. This includes the 147 people said to have been on the two airliners that struck the buildings plus the 2,605 victims trapped in the towers when they were demolished. This makes the demolition of the Twin Towers the largest case of mass murder in U.S. history, but that's not how it was handled by the authorities of the federal government or New York City.

What is most appalling about the 9/11 case is how the most crucial evidence from the crime scene was confiscated and destroyed before it could be properly examined. While it was quite clear to many people (and explosion experts like Van Romero) that the steel-framed Twin Towers did not simply collapse due to burning jet fuel, this unproven and most unlikely explanation was accepted without question by the officials responsible for the criminal investigation. While the Federal Bureau of Investigation was supposedly investigating the crime, it was actually allowing the steel from the World Trade Center to be cut up into small pieces and exported to Asian smelters – before it could be examined.

The officials who oversaw the investigation at the World Trade Center certainly knew it was wrong to dispose of evidence from the crime scene before it had been properly examined. The fact that the highest officials at the Department of Justice and the FBI allowed the structural steel to be destroyed without been examined indicates that a high-level criminal conspiracy was at work to prevent it from becoming forensic evidence. The conspiracy to destroy the steel is an intrinsic part of the 9/11 crime because it was absolutely essential to prevent the discovery of who and what had caused the murderous demolition of the towers.

The spectacular explosive demolitions that pulverized the 220 concrete floors of the Twin Towers from the top down were evidently accomplished using an extremely powerful explosive form of "super thermite". A sophisticated bi-layered coating of super thermite had evidently been applied to surfaces inside the towers, perhaps in the ducts running through the concrete floors or on the undersides of the floor pans. When the explosive thermitic coating was detonated it pulverized the 4-inch thick concrete floors and the steel pans that held them. The intense heat released by the alumino-thermic reaction melted the steel pans, creating billions of tiny molten iron droplets that fell like burning hail from the apocalyptic clouds that rolled across lower Manhattan.

The demolition of the Twin Towers created billions of tiny droplets of molten iron that are not explained by the government-funded research.

The abundance of iron-rich spheroids in the dust of the destroyed towers is not explained in the U.S. Geological Survey's published study or by the government-funded research that concluded that burning jet fuel caused the towers to collapse. A fire of burning jet fuel, however, does not produce temperatures anywhere near the melting point of steel and cannot explain the extremely large amount of molten iron found in the dust and rubble.

The discovery of fragments of unexploded super thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones, on the other hand, explains both the pulverization of the concrete floors and the abundance of molten iron droplets in the dust. Conventional thermite cutter charges were apparently also used to slice the massive core columns that held up the towers. Numerous eyewitnesses, including a reporter from the BBC, reported powerful explosions at the base of the towers long before the collapses occurred. None of this evidence of explosions, even from reporters on the scene, has been taken into account by the government or the controlled media.

Steel is said to have a memory because when it is exposed to explosions or extreme heat its structure is affected. Because explosions and thermite leave permanent telltale signs on steel, the real masterminds of 9/11 had arranged a network in advance to manage the quick recovery and hasty destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center – before it could be examined by experts.



"By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Make War" is the official motto of the Mossad. "Tahvulot" in Hebrew is better translated as "with tricks" than as "way of deception", and is deeply related to the modern word for "terrorism."
- Ro'i Tov, The Cross of Bethlehem

Consistency is close to being the mark of a set of true beliefs; it is at least rationally compelling.
- Robin Waterfield, Gorgias by Plato, Oxford University Press 2008

Mindful of the early evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks and cognizant of the hypothesis that 9/11 was an elaborate false-flag deception carried out by Israeli military intelligence and Zionist agents in high places, I pursued my investigation. Having found Israeli nationals and dedicated Zionists at every key point of the 9/11 matrix, I expected to find Zionist agents involved in the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. When I discovered that the scrapyard that managed the destruction of most of the steel had employed a team of metal traders sent by a high-level agent of the Mossad to dispose of the steel by sending it to Asian smelters, I was not surprised because it was consistent with what I had expected. Consistency is indeed the mark of a set of true beliefs.

In January 1999 the Business Wire reported that two scrap iron traders who worked for Marc Rich and his renamed company, Glencore AG, were being sent to New York to create an international trading division at Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, the scrap metal company who managed the destruction of the lion's share of the steel from the World Trade Center. Marc Rich and his lieutenant Ivan Glasenberg, CEO of Glencore International, are both Israeli citizens with close ties to the Mossad. The head of the Marc Rich Foundation in Israel is a former Mossad operative named Avner Azulay (also spelled Azoulai).

Avner Azulay runs the Marc Rich Foundation from Shaul Eisenberg's Asia House in Tel Aviv.

Shaul Nehemia Eisenberg worked closely with the Japanese military training Betar and Irgun terrorists during World War II. Mordechai Olmert, the father of Ehud Olmert, was one of the founders of Betar and Irgun terrorist organizations in China and Palestine with whom Eisenberg worked closely.

Mordechai Olmert started the Betar chapter in Harbin, China, and was one of the founders of the Zionist terrorist gang known as the Irgun. After leaving China in 1930, Mordechai and his wife Bella Vugman spent three years in Holland before moving to Palestine in 1933. For 14 years he and his wife Bella were active in "missions" for the terrorist organization, the Irgun Zva’i Le’umi (Etzel). In 1947, Mordechai was sent to China by Menachem Begin, the Chief Commander of the Ezel (Irgun), to raise funds for the Irgun ship Altalena. (Source: "Jews of Harbin", by Dr. Irena Vladimirsky)

Ehud Olmert, then Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem, was in New York City on 9/11 on Betar business, a fact that has never been discussed in the controlled media. Olmert, who became prime minister after Ariel Sharon was put into a coma, was born in Palestine and raised in the Betar Youth Organization. His parents were among the founders of the terrorist Irgun.

The Marc Rich Foundation in Israel is run by Azulay working out of Shaul Eisenberg’s Asia House in Tel Aviv. Eisenberg is the mega Mossad operative owner of Israel Corp., Israel Aircraft Industries, ZIM shipping, ATASCO, and hundreds of ventures in Asia, including Atwell Security, the Mossad company that obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in the 1980s. (See Chapter 2, "The Planes of 9/11")

Shaul Eisenberg's Asia House in Tel Aviv, the center of many Israeli connections to 9/11.

Shaul Eisenberg left Germany in 1939 and moved to the Far East, making his primary bases of operation Japanese-occupied Shanghai and Japan itself. In Shanghai, Eisenberg, along with Imperial Japanese military intelligence units, formed units of future Jewish terrorist groups - the Irgun and the Shanghai Betar. The Irgun and Betar gangs used the knowledge gained from the Japanese in their terror campaign against British and Arab forces in Palestine following World War II.

Eventually, Irgun and Betar veterans would create the Likud Party, which is now headed by Binyamin Netanyahu, an extreme right-winger. After the war, Eisenberg began selling iron and steel scrap. Married to a Japanese woman who converted to Judaism, Eisenberg established the Israel Corporation, a huge holding company, which, during the 1970s, began to secretly export Israeli military equipment and weapons to China. Under a Panama-based company called United Development, Inc., Eisenberg began exporting weapons to Central America's most insidious dictatorships, including that of Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua. Eisenberg's vast holdings eventually included Israel Aircraft Industries and Zim Israel Navigation Company.

Azulay was a Mossad operative in Lebanon during Israel's invasion in 1982. In Lebanon, Azulay worked closely with Ariel Sharon, the Minister of Defense who carried out the murderous invasion. The prime minister at the time was Menachem Begin, the former head of the terrorist Irgun group, which later became the Likud party.

The two New Jersey junkyards who handled most of the steel from the World Trade Center were the final links in a secure system arranged by the Zionist masterminds behind 9/11 to destroy the crucial evidence. The highest agent in this system was Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. The FBI has special investigative jurisdiction in crimes of terrorism, and Chertoff, an Israeli national and son of a Mossad agent, was the senior official who oversaw the FBI investigation and the collection of evidence.

Michael Chertoff, the head of the criminal division of the Department of Justice, oversaw the FBI investigation of 9/11 and collection of evidence.

Because it was Chertoff’s responsibility to oversee the gathering of the evidence from the crime scenes of 9/11, I first turned to him to ask if he had authorized the destruction of the steel. Chertoff wrote back saying, “No.” Asked if he knew who had, Chertoff said, “No idea.” If the criminal destruction of the evidence from the World Trade Center were to be prosecuted as it should be, Chertoff should be charged with criminal negligence because it was his responsibility to oversee the proper collection and protection of evidence in order to prosecute those behind 9/11.

Chertoff's complete abdication of his responsibility and the failure of the FBI to protect the steel evidence allowed officials of New York City to oversee the removal and disposal of evidence from the crime scene. As head of the criminal division of the Department of Justice, Chertoff had authority over the FBI investigation. Under the guise of the “clean-up” of the rubble, Chertoff allowed the control of the crucial steel evidence to devolve upon an agency of the city of New York headed by an official appointed by Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

Richard J. Sheirer, then commissioner of Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management (OEM), was the local official who was given complete authority over the “clean-up” at the World Trade Center. As New York magazine of 15 October 2001 reported:

Since September 11, Sheirer has taken charge of the biggest clean-up effort in American history, coordinating 100 federal, state, and local agencies, including FEMA. He's become, in effect, the CEO of a company with thousands of workers and a budget that could run up to $40 billion -- or, if you prefer, the mayor of the hot zone..."OEM is in charge," says Mike Byrne, deputy federal coordinating officer of FEMA for this incident. "Sheirer gives the marching orders. So far, we're blown away by OEM's performance."

Sheirer delegated the handling of the steel to an agency under his command, the Department of Design and Construction (DDC), headed by Kenneth Holden. When Holden gave his statement to the 9/11 Commission on April 1, 2003, he said that he had received "verbal permission" to send the steel to scrap yards in New Jersey, but failed to name the person who had authorized the removal. Seeing that Richard Sheirer of the OEM was in charge of the clean-up and giving “marching orders” to the DDC, it is logical to assume that it was Sheirer who authorized the removal of the steel to the two junkyards in New Jersey, Hugo Neu and Metal Management Northeast, where it was cut into small pieces, mixed with other scrap, and shipped to Asian steel companies.

Hugo Neu and Metal Management Northeast were the final links in the closed system that was set up by the terror masterminds to ensure the secure destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center. In three easy steps from the FBI to the junkyard, the control of the crucial steel evidence passed from one Zionist-controlled agency to the next until it was destroyed in the smelters of Asian steel companies.


Hugo Neu “played a pivotal role as the principal recycler of steel from the World Trade Center,” the company says about its role in the destruction of the steel. Robert A. Kelman, then senior vice president and general manager of Hugo Neu, told the Associated Press in 2002 that his company had handled 250,000 tons of trade center scrap and had shipped it to 11 countries, including Malaysia, China, South Korea, and Japan.

Each of the towers contained about 78,000 tons of recyclable steel. Frank Lombardi, chief engineer for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which built the World Trade Center and owned six of the seven buildings (except Larry Silverstein's WTC 7), said the rubble contained an estimated 285,000 tons of steel. This would mean that Hugo Neu processed about 88 percent of the steel from the World Trade Center.

Less than a month after 9/11, James Glanz of the New York Times reported how Kelman's company was hastily cutting up the steel, destroying the crucial evidence that could reveal how the World Trade Center had been demolished:

When it reached the Port Authority pier, the Kathleen dropped off the loaded barge, picked up one of three waiting empty barges and immediately headed back to Pier 6 in Manhattan. A second tug would pick up the steel and tow it to one of two scrap recyclers, either Metal Management of Newark or Hugo Neu Schnitzer East.

The docks at Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, in the Claremont Channel in Jersey City, reveal the next leg of the journey. With a clear view of the altered skyline of Manhattan, a grappler on steel treads lifts beams out of another blue sanitation barge and adds it to a pile of wreckage that already stretches some 600 feet, reaching 30 or 40 feet high in places...

A few steps from the grappler, a team of men with torches were already cutting beams into pieces five or six feet long. It is in that form that the material will be sent to steelmakers who will melt it down in huge ovens to make new products.

A grappler and magnet at Hugo Neu's Jersey City junkyard

Kelman said Hugo Neu had a work force of nearly one hundred people working on the scrap metal from the World Trade Center, including 25 workers assigned to girder cutting, working around the clock in twelve-hour shifts. Kelman told the AP that the steel from the Twin Towers was sliced into pieces with industrial guillotines or blow torches and thrown in with other scrap before being shipped to smelters in Asia. Alan Ratner, president of Metal Management Northeast, the second junkyard processing the steel, said his firm had 40 to 60 people working on the job.

The people at Hugo Neu and Metal Management Northeast were obviously engaged in a hasty effort to cut up the steel, mix it with other scrap, and export it to distant Asian smelters. The real purpose behind this effort was to prevent the steel from being properly examined and becoming evidence that could expose the real cause of the explosive demolition that claimed nearly 2,800 lives. The crucial roles played by Hugo Neu and Metal Management in the recycling of the steel did not happen by accident but were part of a well organized plan to ensure the destruction of the evidence from the World Trade Center.

Having contacted the key players involved in the destruction of the steel, I have not found one that is willing to discuss the subject. I have, therefore, relied primarily on press articles and other information in the public domain to try to piece together the arrangement by which this critical part of the 9/11 cover up was carried out.


Knowing there would be a huge amount of structural steel remaining after the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers, the terror masterminds put in place a network to manage the destruction of the steel, the solid evidence that could expose their crime. One scrap metal dealer, Hugo Neu Schnitzer East of Jersey City, already had the contract with New York City to recycle steel from the Fresh Kills dump on Staten Island, where the first truckloads of steel from the World Trade Center were taken. Hugo Neu reportedly wound up processing some 250,000 tons, nearly 90 percent of the steel from the rubble, by cutting it up into pieces shorter than 60 inches, mixing it with other scrap, and sending it to Asian steel mills.

The second generation German-Jewish scrap dealer was certainly well prepared to handle the massive job. In August 2001, Hugo Neu was engaged in a private-public project to dredge the narrow, two-mile Claremont Channel that ships used to reach its yard. The channel, which was only 10 feet deep in places, was dredged to a depth of 34 feet. Because the dredging was done to improve shipping for Hugo Neu, the company paid $24 million while the New Jersey Office of Maritime Resources paid $20.5 million. The dredging allowed larger ships to load at Hugo Neu's Claremont facility, which is exactly what was required to export the 9/11 steel on ocean-going vessels to Asia.

To broker the deals with Asian mills Hugo Neu had created a global trading division in 1999, headed by two veteran ferrous metal traders from Marc Rich and Glencore AG in Switzerland. But why would Hugo Neu invest $24 million in dredging the channel and create a global trading division when scrap iron prices were at the lowest levels in 50 years?

As the Business Wire reported from New York in January 1999:

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 19, 1999--Hugo Neu Corporation and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., who jointly own and operate an extensive network of scrap metal collection, processing and recycling facilities throughout the United States, announced today the formation of a new jointly owned international trading venture.

The new venture, known as Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade LLC, will build on the years of experience and expertise of Hugo Neu and Schnitzer in the international ferrous scrap metal markets and their long-term industry leadership in scrap metal processing and recycling operations. The principal officers of this venture will be Nathan K. Fruchter and Jehuda Saar, formerly co-managers of the ferrous scrap department of Glencore AG in Europe, who bring extensive experience and commodity trading know-how with them. Combined with the processing, recycling and trading capabilities of Hugo Neu and Schnitzer, Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade will offer an unparalleled array of services and a broader scrap supply to a large base of overseas and domestic customers.

The new trading venture will maintain executive offices in New York and will purchase scrap and other commodities from suppliers in Eastern and Western Europe, Australia, South Africa and other foreign countries for sale to steel mills and foundries around the world.

The price of scrap steel was at a 50-year low from 2001-2003.

January 1999 seems like an odd time for Hugo Neu to have created a global trading division in ferrous scrap metal considering that the price of scrap iron had plunged 50 percent and was at its lowest point in 50 years – between $70-80 per ton. Having fallen from $150 per ton in late 1998, the price of scrap steel remained very low between 2001-2003, exactly the period when the steel from the World Trade Center was exported to Asian mills halfway around the world. With shipping costs running about $25 per ton, the cost of shipping steel to Asia devoured most of the dealer's profit margin. As Robert Kelman of Hugo Neu told the Record of New Jersey in November 2001, "I'm hoping I net $5 a ton, but I don't know.”

The two recyclers who bought the steel from the World Trade Center were taking on a huge amount of steel in the most depressed scrap market of their time. Was there a hidden partner directing the destruction of the steel? Why didn't Hugo Neu simply sell the high quality steel from the World Trade Center to U.S. mills and save money on the cost of shipping? It seems that there must have been a hidden imperative behind the decision to sell the steel to distant Asian steel mills.

If Hugo Neu's role in exporting the steel to Asia was part of the 9/11 cover up, the “principal officers” of Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade would have been part of the conspiracy. This is how Jehuda Saar and Nathan K. Fruchter describe their history with Hugo Neu:

After spending their early professional careers with the Marc Rich Group both in the US and the UK, the principals of Idoru Trading Corp, Nathan K. Fruchter and Jehuda Saar, took over the Ferrous Scrap division at Glencore in Europe in 1994. They ran the division until 1999 when they were recruited by then US scrap giants Schnitzer Steel and Hugo Neu Corp. to set up their new international division, Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global Trade LLC (HNSGT).

In 2001 the two left HNSGT and created a new ferrous scrap division, Idoru LLC, for the Midland Group, combining their extensive experience in global ferrous scrap trade with Midland's steel expertise in Ukraine and the CIS. By 2005 the Midland Group completed their spin-off of the scrap division, and Idoru Trading was born.

It is not known when Saar and Fruchter actually left Hugo Neu Global Trading and went to work for the Midland Group, which was founded by two Russian Jews, Alex Shnaider and Eduard Shifrin. Fruchter told me that he had been fired from Hugo Neu in January 2000, which is certainly not true because a November 2000 article in the International Herald Tribune describes Nathan Fruchter as “vice president of the international trading division of Hugo Neu Corporation in Manhattan.” It was obvious that Fruchter did not want to tell me when he actually left Hugo Neu, but why would he want to conceal that?

It seems very likely that Fruchter and Saar had Zionist partners working on both ends of their deals. That is to say that the deals concerning the crucial steel evidence from the World Trade Center were probably done within a closed trading network of Zionist agents, with Alex Shnaider, for example, an Israeli who migrated to Israel from the Ukraine when he was 4 years old. Like Marc Rich, Shnaider's Midland Group also has an office in Hong Kong. From their early days with Marc Rich and Glencore, on to Hugo Neu and the Midland Group, Saar and Fruchter have always worked for companies closely tied to Israel and the Mossad. In 2006, the Belgian Jew Jehuda Saar emigrated from Teaneck, New Jersey, to Israel with his family. His mission in the United States was evidently finished.


If the scrapyards that handled the steel from the World Trade Center were part of a Zionist conspiracy we would expect to find that the junkyards themselves were Zionist-owned operations. This would be consistent with the thesis that 9/11 is a conspiracy in which the key players are all dedicated Zionist partisans of the state of Israel. The junkyards would need to be under Zionist control in order to facilitate the secure destruction of the steel. This is exactly what we find with Hugo Neu Schnitzer East and Metal Management Northeast, the two junkyards that processed the steel from the World Trade Center.

Hugo Neu was a Jewish immigrant from Cologne who headed Associated Metals and Minerals Corp. (AMMC) in New York with two other German Jewish immigrants, Dr. Meno Lissauer and his brother-in-law, Walter M. Rothschild. The Hugo Neu company was started in 1947 and is still run by the tightly knit Neu family. The chairman and chief executive, John L. Neu, is the son of the founder, and Robert Kelman, the general manager, is his brother-in-law. Hugo Neu's vice president in charge of environmental and public affairs is Wendy K. Neu, Neu's wife and Kelman's sister. The father of Robert and Wendy was Captain Peter B. Kelman, a Hugo Neu business associate for nearly 40 years before his death in April 2005. The Kelman family managed the shipping part of the Hugo Neu business. Captain Kelman headed a firm of marine surveyors, Peter B. Kelman & Sons, Hugo Neu's principal marine surveyor in its export business.

Hugo Neu's Zionist character can be seen by its investment in an Israeli venture capital fund called the Agua-Agro Fund, which is managed by an Israeli named Nir Belzer. Belzer also happens to be the senior manager and co-founder of Israel's Millennium Materials Technologies Funds with a man named Oren Gafri. Gafri's biographical sketch says he served as an executive of the Israeli Aircraft Industries Ltd (IAI), Bedek Division, as the Manager of Materials and Process, in charge of the Chemical, Metallurgical, Composite and Non Destructive Testing (NDT) facilities, Labs and R&D from 1979 to 1989. The key connections linking IAI, Bedek, ATASCO, and Shaul Eisenberg with 9/11 are discussed in Chapter 2, “The Planes of 9/11”.

Gafri trained at Israel's Nuclear Research Center (Dimona) in the Negev Desert, where explosive coatings using nanotechnology are developed. Gafri is a specialist in energetic nano-composite coatings exactly like the one that was found in the dust of the World Trade Center. For the junkyard that destroyed most of the steel from the Twin Towers to be invested with an Israeli fund manager who develops such coatings is noteworthy, to say the least.


Metal Management Northeast (MMNE) of Newark was the other junkyard that handled a large amount of steel from the World Trade Center. This scrapyard facility had been a family-owned business, formerly known as Naporano Iron & Metal Co. (and NIMCO Shredding Co.), before being acquired by Metal Management, Inc. of Chicago in July 1998. In March 2001, six months before 9/11, Metal Management, Inc. announced that Alan D. Ratner had replaced Andrew J. Naporano as president of MMNE. Although he had sold his family business, Naporano remained at the company through 2001 and acted as “the consultant” to the Department of Design and Construction on the removal of the steel.

With the fall of the price of scrap steel, the junkyard industry faced financial pressures in the late 1990s. Burdened by its acquisitions in a depressed market, Metal Management Inc. filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2000. Daniel W. Dienst, a managing director with CIBC World Markets, was hired to turn the company around and became a director of Metal Management in June 2001. CIBC World Markets was also known as CIBC Oppenheimer, which became a subsidiary of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce after CIBC acquired New York-based Oppenheimer & Co. in 1997. When Dienst later became chairman of the board for Metal Management Inc., in April 2003, he was still a managing director at CIBC World Markets, where he remained until January 2004. Today, after a merger with Sims Group, Dienst is Group CEO of Sims Metal Management, Ltd. The Hugo Neu Corporation has also merged with the Australia-based Sims Group. The two companies created a joint venture corporation in 2005 known as Sims Hugo Neu Company. The merger created a new division, Hugo Neu Recycling.

At CIBC World Markets, Dienst worked under David Jonathan Kassie, chairman and CEO, and Lior Bregman, the Israeli who was managing director of CIBC World Markets and its predecessor Oppenheimer & Co., from 1988 to 2001. In May 2001, the Jerusalem Post reported that CIBC was the No. 1 underwriter in Israel and had underwritten more than $4.5 billion worth of merger and acquisitions transactions during the previous five years in Israel. "CIBC Oppenheimer has been the driving force behind investment in Israel since the early 1990s," Kassie said. In 2001, CIBC was also providing research for almost 100 Israeli companies, mainly hi-tech firms, the Post reported.

Kassie, a devoted Zionist, has participated in the Macabiah Games in Israel. He is also involved in the major Zionist organizations in Canada and the United States, and is a director of the Shoah Foundation. Under his leadership, CIBC World Markets invested in an Israeli venture capital fund called the Genesis Funds, where Lior Bregman was a partner. Bregman, as managing director of equity research at CIBC Oppenheimer, is well known to the Israeli high tech community. With a background as a military analyst, he coordinated communications equipment activity.

Kassie, Bregman, and Dienst were key players on the team of Zionists behind the takeover of Metal Management Inc. in 2000-2001. When the crucial steel evidence was removed from the World Trade Center and taken to the junkyards of Metal Management Northeast and Hugo Neu Schnitzer East it was being taken to companies that were controlled by dedicated partisans of the Zionist cause and the state of Israel.


Berger, Sharon, "CIBC acquires Israeli brokerage firm", Jerusalem Post, 2 May 2001

Bollyn, Christopher, "The Planes of 9/11", Solving 9/11, October 2007
Bollyn, "Calling Shaul Eisenberg," 25 October 2010

Coleman-Lochner, Lauren, " Jersey City, N.J., Steel Recycler Works on Remains of World Trade Center," The Record, Hackensack, N.J., November 2, 2001

Griscom, Amanda, “Man Behind the Mayor”, New York (magazine), 15 October 2001

Johnson, Jim, "N.J. duo tackles NYC metal mass," Waste News, 2001, HighBeam Research. (April 9, 2011).

Manning, Bill, “Selling Out the Investigation”, Fire Engineering Magazine, January 2002, 25 September 2003

Vladimirsky, Dr. Irena, "Jews of Harbin", (Mordechai Olmert biography by Linda Olmert)
Original - May 19, 2011
Latest Edit – June 23, 2011
Site Admin
Posts: 26007
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

Postby admin » Wed Oct 18, 2017 1:03 am

Chapter 16: Making Sense of the 9/11 Cover Up

In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.
- Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945)

The preceding chapter explains how the structural steel from the Twin Towers, crucial evidence of the murderous demolitions, was destroyed by a network of Zionist agents before it could be examined. From the Israeli Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General at the Department of Justice and the senior official responsible for investigating and prosecuting the crimes of 9/11, to the Mossad-controlled traders and owners of the New Jersey junkyards that managed its destruction, the steel passed from one Zionist agent to another until it was completely destroyed in the furnaces of Asian steel mills. What does this fundamental part of the 9/11 cover up tell us about who is really behind the crime? If Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arab hijackers truly brought down the World Trade Center, why was a network of Israeli intelligence agents engaged in a concerted effort to destroy the evidence?

Common sense tells us that Israeli intelligence did not mastermind the hasty destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center because Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers and Larry Silverstein's WTC 7. Rather, Zionist agents destroyed the evidence to protect the lie that Arab terrorists were to be blamed for the deaths of nearly 3,000 people on 9/11. The physical evidence of the towers was hastily destroyed by a network of Zionist agents because it could expose the falsity of their interpretation of events. Indeed, the fact that a Zionist network had been established in order to manage the destruction of the evidence confirms the hypothesis that 9/11 was a false-flag terror atrocity carried out by Israeli intelligence and their agents in the U.S. government.

The fact that iron boiled beneath the rubble disproves the government-sponsored myth that burning jet fuel caused the towers to collapse.

The intensely hot pile of rubble at the World Trade Center was the scene of a mass murder in which 2,752 people were killed. Dust and steel were virtually all that remained after the explosive demolitions destroyed the towers and the people within them. "The concrete was literally pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust," said Robert A. Kelman, general manager of Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, the Jersey City junkyard that managed the destruction of the largest part of the steel from the World Trade Center.

The unexplained explosive demolitions of the 110-story towers directly caused the deaths of hundreds of people, but the cause of the unprecedented demolitions was certainly not known to the FBI investigation team at the remains of the World Trade Center. One of the first objects of any proper criminal investigation should have been to determine exactly what had caused the explosive demolitions of the towers. The federal investigation should have started with a thorough forensic examination of the dust, the steel, and anything else that remained of the Twin Towers. To allow the remaining structural steel, crucial evidence that could have revealed the cause of the collapses, to be destroyed without being examined was clearly a grave breach of duty by the officials at the Department of Justice and their investigative agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The FBI failed to collect and examine the steel to determine what had caused the explosive demolitions seen on 9/11.

The hasty destruction of the unexamined steel from the World Trade Center could not have occurred had the FBI not allowed it to happen. The highest officials at the Department of Justice were clearly part of the conspiracy to conceal the truth about 9/11 by allowing the crucial evidence from the World Trade Center to be destroyed without having it examined and documented by steel experts, scientists, and engineers.


The facts indicate that the 9/11 cover up is a Zionist operation in which partisans of the state of Israel have played all the key roles. If the attacks of 9/11 were truly acts of Muslim Arab terrorists there would be no reason for Zionists to manage the destruction of the evidence. The terror plot to destroy the World Trade Center had been planned for more than 20 years and was being discussed by senior Israeli intelligence figures in 1980, as we know from published comments of Michael D. Evans, an American Zionist Jew who poses as a Christian missionary. Evans was told by the former Mossad chief Isser Harel of the plan to bomb the World Trade Center in 1980, when Osama Bin Laden was about 23 years old. (See: "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism")

This indicates that Israeli intelligence began planning and preparing the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 in the late 1970s when the notorious terrorist chief Menachem Begin and his Likud party came to power in Israel. Begin created the Likud party in 1973 from the membership of the Irgun, the Zionist terror group he headed in Palestine in the 1940s. The false flag terror plan for 9/11 required having high-level Zionist agents connected to the Mossad occupying positions from which they could directly control the cover up.

Putting the agents into the key positions was arranged by controlling the presidential appointments of judges and officials at the Department of Justice. Such political appointments are greatly facilitated by having Mossad agents in the inner corridors of power. Rahm Emanuel, for example, the son of an Israeli terrorist who worked closely with Menachem Begin, was the key Mossad insider in the Clinton White House where, for example, he single-handedly pushed the disastrous NAFTA bill through Congress. Emanuel later became the first chief of staff for President Obama and mayor of Chicago.

Rahm Emanuel was the Israeli insider in the Clinton and Obama administrations. His father is a former member of the Irgun, a notorious Zionist terror group in Palestine.


There are three fundamental fields that need to be controlled in a cover up like 9/11: the investigation, the interpretation, and the prosecution and related litigation.

The investigation involves the detective work supposedly done by the FBI and includes the collection and analysis of the evidence. Interpretation is how the events are explained to the public by the government and controlled media. Prosecution and litigation use the courts to assign blame for the crime and responsibility for the losses. In the 9/11 cover up we find high-level Zionist agents in the key positions of all three fields.

Zionist control over the political interpretation of 9/11 can be readily seen in how the Bush administration and the controlled media accepted without question the unproven explanation blaming Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida. This explanation was exactly what the architects of terror wanted the world to believe and was first articulated by Ehud Barak, the former Israeli commando leader and prime minister, on BBC World television minutes after the demolitions of the Twin Towers.

Live from London, Israel's military chief Ehud Barak appeared on BBC World television on 9/11 urging the United States to begin the "War on Terror" by invading Afghanistan.

Through their media monopoly (e.g. FOX News, CNN, CBS, New York Times, etc.) the Zionist interpretation of 9/11 was pushed relentlessly on the gullible American public. No other possible explanation was even discussed and people who held dissenting points of view were ignored, slandered, and attacked, as I was by FOX News, CNN, The Chicago Tribune, undercover police and the corrupt courts of Cook County.

Zionist control of the media was essential in shaping public opinion and directing the anger and blame at Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida. The controlled politicians dutifully parroted the media version, which quickly became the “party line” of both parties. Dissent was quashed. Politicians, academics, and journalists who expressed doubts or raised questions about what really happened were treated like pariahs and removed from their positions.

The Zionist control of the cover up is also seen very clearly in the investigation and prosecution fields. Michael Chertoff, as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the criminal division of the Department of Justice, was directly responsible for the federal prosecution of the terrorists behind 9/11 and for overseeing the investigation by the FBI. Chertoff, an orthodox Jew, is an Israeli citizen by virtue of the fact that he is the son of an Israeli, Livia Eisen, who happened to be one of the first Mossad agents. Had the FBI collected and scrutinized the steel and dust from the Twin Towers, questions would have been raised by the discovery of evidence of both explosives and thermite. Rather than deal with the evidence, Chertoff simply abdicated his responsibilities and allowed Zionist officials working under Mayor Rudy Giuliani to "clean up" the crime scene by destroying the steel evidence through specially prepared junkyards in New Jersey.

Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and the key federal official responsible for prosecuting the crimes of 9/11, allowed the crucial evidence to be destroyed. He is the son of one of the first Mossad agents.

As the federal official responsible for the criminal prosecution, Chertoff also had control over access to the evidence. Through a newly created agency, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and a special category of evidence known as Sensitive Security Information (SSI), Chertoff retained his control over the 9/11 evidence even after he became the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security in 2005. The key role that Chertoff played in the 9/11 cover up is solely due to the fact that he, like Rahm Emanuel, is a high-level Zionist partisan from a family with a very long and close connection to Israeli intelligence.

Alvin K. Hellerstein is the other hand of the Zionist-controlled cover up in the judicial field in which access to the evidence is crucial. Hellerstein is a U.S. district judge in Manhattan, appointed to the federal bench by President Bill Clinton in 1998. Judge Alvin Hellerstein presides over all 9/11 tort litigation and criminal cases related to the terror attacks.

Alvin K. Hellerstein has blocked a 9/11 trial for years by waging a judicial war of attrition against the victims' families, forcing all but one into out-of-court settlements. Hellerstein's son lives in Israel and works for a law firm that represents the parent company of one of the key defendants in the 9/11 litigation. This glaring conflict of interest is ignored by the media.

Although 96 families who lost loved ones on 9/11 chose to litigate rather than accept the government payout, Judge Hellerstein waged a prolonged war of attrition against the families forcing all of them, with only one exception, to settle out of court. The family of Mark Bavis of Boston, a passenger on Flight 175, is the only family that will have a 9/11 trial to determine who was responsible for their loss. Hellerstein, however, has imposed a most arbitrary and unusual time limit for the only 9/11 trial that will be held to determine who is responsible for the loss of life. He will only allow one month for the entire trial with only 50 hours allowed for each side.

As an orthodox Jew and a Zionist, Judge Hellerstein has a serious conflict of interest that should have prevented him for hearing any 9/11 cases. Israel, through its intelligence agency the Mossad, is a key defendant in the 9/11 litigation. Hellerstein and his immediate family are devoted supporters of the state of Israel. This presents an obvious conflict of interest that should have kept Hellerstein from overseeing the 9/11 tort litigation in the first place.

Furthermore, Judge Hellerstein’s son, Joseph, lives in Israel and works for an Israeli law firm that represents the parent company of one of the defendants in the 9/11 tort litigation, Mossad's “security” company International Consultants for Targeted Security (ICTS NV). ICTS owns Huntleigh USA, the airport security company responsible for screening the passengers that boarded the planes on 9/11. The fact that Hellerstein is a religious Zionist with a close family connection to one of the defendants should disqualify him from managing the 9/11 litigation, but it has not.

Joseph Z. Hellerstein

The impropriety of Judge Hellerstein's glaring conflict of interest in the 9/11 litigation has been completely ignored by the media. Hellerstein and Chertoff have both facilitated the 9/11 cover up and obstructed justice for the families of the victims with their improper conduct. Brazen and shameless, they are confident their misdeeds will be ignored and that they will be remain protected and supported by the larger Zionist network that controls the U.S. government.

As German intelligence experts told me in 2001, 9/11 was a sophisticated operation that required years of planning and the fixed structure of a state intelligence agency. It was, they said, far beyond the capabilities of a loosely structured group like Al Qaida. Such a false-flag terror operation consists of three levels, Andreas von Buelow said: the architectural, managerial, and working levels. The architectural level designs the terrorism primarily to affect public opinion while the managerial level manages the execution of the crime and the cover up. The working level, von Buelow said, is actually part of the deception. While Hellerstein and Chertoff are probably not architectural level planners of the terror attacks, they are certainly dedicated Zionist foot soldiers at the managerial level of the 9/11 cover up.

The reason for Hellerstein and Chertoff to be confident in the face of their blatant misconduct is obvious. In spite of the serious nature of their crimes, which enabled the 9/11 cover up, these two Zionist agents of deception have not suffered any penalties under the law or faced a single word of criticism from the media for the glaring improprieties they committed as federal employees. Where is the watchful eye of the government? Why do Hellerstein and Chertoff act as if they are above the law? Where is the free press, the watchdog of a properly functioning democratic state? Is this not evidence of a conspiracy?

The false-flag terror atrocity of 9/11 changed more than public opinion. The 9/11 deception that has been foisted on the nation has changed the fundamental relationship between the U.S. government and the American people. The proper role of government is to alleviate the suffering of the people, not increase it. The Declaration of Independence states that governments are instituted among men in order to secure their unalienable rights, namely life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it."

The deception of 9/11 was used to instill fear in the population in order to usher in a radical and fraudulent Zeitgeist under the rubric the “War on Terror.” To submit to the 9/11 deception is to subject ourselves and our nation to an open-ended agenda of war. The Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror” began with the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11, which led directly to illegal wars of aggression in the Middle East and a greatly enlarged police-state apparatus in the United States. We have certainly not seen the end of it.

The 10-year of war in Afghanistan is supposedly being fought to root out the terrorist networks who carried out 9/11.

These disastrous and costly wars have done immense damage to our nation and others, wasting more than $1.6 trillion and ruining countless lives. Believing the lies about 9/11 has made helpless victims of millions of people, such as those who have gone to war in Afghanistan and Iraq thinking they were defending their nation from terrorists. The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from continued enslavement to this criminal deception is to understand how it was imposed on us and who is behind it. To accept the 9/11 deception is to support the evil fruit it brings in its train and to allow ourselves to be held captive in its "Auschwitz of the mind".

Liberation from the deception can only happen when individuals choose to reject fear and examine the facts with a truly open mind. The personal choice to examine the evidence, embrace the facts, and conquer fear is the most important decision we can make as free men. As my patriotic duty to my nation and as a service to mankind, I am sharing my insights and the fruits of my research about the 9/11 deception in the hope that by understanding how this evil deception was planned and executed we can liberate ourselves from it and secure a more just and peaceful world for our children.


BBC World, "Ehud Barak interview," 11 September 2001

Bollyn, Christopher, "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism," Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World, January 2008 ... -terrorism

Bollyn, "Homeland Security & the Exclusion of Evidence," 11 September 2007 ... f-evidence

Bollyn, "Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit," 10 May 2010 ... 11-lawsuit
Original - May 19, 2011
Latest Edit – June 23, 2011
Site Admin
Posts: 26007
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am


Return to Political Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest