Re: The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib, edited by Ka
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:17 am
PART 1 OF 27 (Inquiry Into the Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody)
INQUIRY INTO THE TREATMENT OF DETAINEES IN U.S. CUSTODY-- REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, UNITED STATES SENATE
110th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print
November 20, 2008
Table of Contents
Note on Source Material Used in the Preparation of the Report (U)
List of Acronyms Used in the Report (U)
Executive Summary and Conclusions (U)
• I. Early Influences on Interrogation Policy (U)
o A. Redefining the Legal Framework For the Treatment of Detainees (U)
o B. Department of Defense Office of General Counsel Seeks Information from the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA) (U)
o C. JPRA Collaboration with Other Government Agencies (OGAs) (U)
o D. JPRA Support to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) (U)
o E. JPRA Recommendations for GTMO (U)
o F. Colonel Herrington's Assessment of GTMO (U)
o G. JPRA Prepares Draft Exploitation Plan (U)
• II. Development of New Interrogation Authorities (U)
o A. CIA's Interrogation Program and the Interrogation of Abu Zubaydah (U)
o B. JPRA Assistance to Another Government Agency (U)
o C. Senior SERE Psychologist Detailed From Department of Defense to Other Government Agency (U)
o D. Department of Defense General Counsel Seeks Information on SERE Techniques From JPRA (U)
o E. The Department of Justice Changes the Rules (U)
o F. JPRA 's Special Program In Support of [delete] (U)
1. August 2002 Training Proposal (U)
2. JPRA Creates Project 22B (U)
• III. Guantanamo Bay as a "Battle Lab" for New Interrogation Techniques (U)
o A. GTMO Stands Up a Behavioral Science Consultation Team (BSCT) (U)
o B. Behavioral Science Consultation Team (BSCT) Personnel Contact the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) (U)
o C. U.S. Southern Command Seeks External Review of GTMO (U)
o D. GTMO Personnel Attend Training at Fort Bragg (U)
o E. Delegation of Senior Government Lawyers Visits Guantanamo (U)
o F. JTF-170 BSCT Produces Interrogation Policy Memo (U)
o G. CIA Lawyer Advises GTMO on Interrogations (U)
o H. DoD Takes Lead on the Interrogation of Mohammed al Khatani (U)
• IV. GTMO Seeks Authority to Use Aggressive Interrogation Techniques (U)
o A. GTMO Requests Counter-Resistance Techniques Influenced by SERE (U)
o B. GTMO Staff Judge Advocate Conducts "Legal Review of Aggressive Interrogation Techniques" (U)
o C. Chain of Command Considers the Requestfor Interrogation Techniques as CITF and FBI Raise Objections (U)
o D. Military Services React to GTMO Requestfor Interrogation Techniques (U)
o E. Department of Defense General Counsel Quashes Joint Staff Legal Review (U)
o F. GTMO and JPRA Plan for Additional Interrogation Training (U)
• V. Command Change at Guantanamo as Dispute over Aggressive Techniques Continues (U)
o A. Major General Geoffrey Miller Takes Command of JTF-GTMO (U)
o B. Khatani Interrogation Plan Fuels Dispute Over Aggressive Techniques (U)
1. JTF-GTMO Staff Circulate Khatani Interrogation Plan (U)
2. CITF and FBI Object to Proposed Interrogation Techniques (U)
3. JTF-GTMO Briefs DoD General Counsel's Office on Interrogation Plan (U)
4. "Final" Khatani Interrogation Plan (U)
5. FBI and ClTF Continue to Object to Khatani Interrogation Plan (U)
6. Khatani Interrogation Begins, CITF Directed To "Stand Clear" (U)
7. Techniques Used During Khatani Interrogation (U)
• VI. JPRA's Assistance to Another Government Agency (U)
• VII. Secretary Rumsfeld Approves Interrogation Authorities, GTMOPlans to Implement SERE Techniques (U)
o A. Secretary of Defense Authorizes Aggressive Techniques for use at GTMO (U)
o B. JTF-GTMO Develops Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Use of SERE Techniques in Interrogations (U)
o C. SERE School Trainers Provide Instruction for GTMO Interrogators (U)
o D. Navy General Counsel Raises Concerns About Interrogation Techniques, Secretary Rumsfeld Rescinds Authority (U)
o E. National Security Council (NSC) Principals Discuss DoD Interrogations (U)
• VIII. New Interrogation Policy Developed for GTMO (U)
o A. The Working Group Solicits Information on Interrogation Techniques
1. The Defense Intelligence Agency Provides Information on Specific Interrogation Techniques (U)
2. The Working Group Solicits Information About Interrogation Techniques From CENTCOM and SOUTHCOM (U)
3. The Working Group Requests Information from JPRA (U)
o B. Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel's Analysis Is Presented As Controlling Authority (U)
o C. Working Group Drafts Report Recommending Interrogation Techniques (U)
o D. SOUTHCOM Presses for Additional Techniques (U)
o E. JPRA Briefs Members of the Working Group on SERE Techniques, Including Physical Pressures (U)
o F. The Working Group Finalizes Its Report and the Secretary of Defense Issues a New Interrogation Policy For GTMO (U)
• IX. Aggressive Interrogations at GTMO (U)
o A. Allegations of Detainee Mistreatment (U)
o B. Special Interrogation Plans Modeled on Khatani Interrogation (U)
1. JTF-GTMO Plans for Interrogation of Slahi (U)
2. JTF-GTMO Formally Submits Special Interrogation Planfor Slahi (ISN 760) (U)
3. Interrogation Begins Before the Special Interrogation Plan Is Approved (U)
4. Special Interrogation Plan Approved and Implemented Despite Apparent Cooperation (U)
5. FBI Concerns with Special Interrogation (U)
6. Special Project at GTMO Uses Aggressive Interrogation Techniques (U)
7. CITF Reissues Order for Agents to "Stand Clear" of Aggressive Interrogations (U)
8. GTMO Seeks Approval for Two Additional Special Interrogation Plans (U)
a. Special Interrogation Plan #3 (U)
b. Special Interrogation Plan #4 (U)
c. SOUTHCOM and OSD SO/LIC Recommend Approval of Special Interrogation Plans #3 & #4 (U)
• X. DOJ Office of Legal Counsel Withdraws March 14, 2003 Legal Opinion Governing DoD Interrogations (U)
• XI. Development of Interrogation Policy in Afghanistan (U)
o A. Assessment Team Visit to Guantanamo Bay (U)
o B. The Deaths of Dilawar and Habibullah (U)
o C. Questions Raised About Task Force Participation in OGA Interrogations (U)
o D. January 2003 Task Force Interrogation SOP (Afghanistan) (U)
o E. CJTF-180 Produces Memorandum on Interrogation Techniques (U)
o F. CENTCOM Raises Concerns About Interrogation Techniques (U)
• XII. Development of Interrogation Policy in Iraq (U)
o A. Special Mission Unit Task Force Interrogation Policies (U)
1. SMU Task Force Uses Afghanistan Interrogation Policy (U)
2. OGA Comments on SMU TF Interrogation Techniques (U)
3. July 2003 Interrogation SOP Drafted for Iraq SMU TF (U)
4. Iraq Survey Group Concerns with SMU TF Detainee Treatment (U)
o B. Interrogation Policies for Conventional Forces in Iraq (U)
1. CJTF-7 Stands Up (Summer 2003) (U)
2. Interrogation Operations Begin at Abu Ghraib (U)
3. 519th MI Battalion at Abu Ghraib Seeks Additional Guidance (U)
4. 519th MI BN Proposes Interrogation Policy (U)
5. CJTF-7 Solicits "Wish List" of Interrogation Techniques (U)
6. Interrogation OIC at Abu Ghraib Resubmits the Proposed Interrogation Policy for 519th MI BN (U)
o C. JPRA Provides "Offensive" SERE Training in Iraq (U)
1. Special Mission Unit Task Force in Iraq Seeks Assistance from JPRA (U)
2. Awareness of the JPRA Trip to Iraq at Headquarters, Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) (U)
3. JPRA Provides Interrogation Support to the Special Mission Unit Task Force in Iraq (U)
4. JPRA Team Authorized to Participate in Interrogations (U)
5. JPRA Present as Interrogator Uses Stress Positions and Slaps (U)
6. JPRA Team Authorized to Use SERE Techniques (U)
7. JPRA Team Chief Seeks Legal Guidance (U)
8. JPRA Training Manager and Contractor Participate in an Interrogation (U)
9. JPRA Team Chief Objects to SMU TF Interrogation (U)
10. JPRA Develops a Concept of Operations (CONOP) (U)
11. JPRA Team Leaves Iraq (U)
12. U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) Reviews JPRA Concept Of Operations (CONOP) (U)
13. JFCOM Verifies Team Chief's Account of Events in Iraq (U)
o D. Major General Geoffrey Miller Leads GTMO Assessment Team to Iraq (U)
1. CJTF-7 Commander Identifies Deficiencies (U)
2. GTMO Assessment Team Travels to Iraq (U)
3. GTMO Team Visits Iraq Survey Group (ISG) (U)
4. GTMO Team Visits Special Mission Unit Task Force (U)
5. GTMO Team Discusses Interrogations with CJTF-7 (U)
6. GTMO Commander Recommends CJTF-7 Develop an Interrogation Policy (U)
7. JTF-GTMO Assessment Team Produces Trip Report (U)
8. MG Miller Briefs Senior DoD Officials on Assessment Visit (U)
o E. Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy Established (U)
1. CJTF-7 Commander Issues Policy Including Aggressive Interrogation Techniques (U)
2. Interrogation and Counter Resistance Policy Implemented at Abu Ghraib (U)
3. CENTCOM Raises Concerns About CJTF-7 Policy (U)
4. CJTF-7 Issues New Interrogation Policy (U)
o F. SMU Task Force Issues a New Interrogation SOP (U)
o Footnotes
• XIII. Interrogation Techniques and Detainee Mistreatment at Abu Ghraib (U)
o A. Use of Military Working Dogs (U)
o B. Stress Positions and Physical Training (U)
o C. Removal of Clothing (U)
o D. Sleep Adjustment/Sleep Management (U)
o E. Sensory Deprivation and Isolation (U)
o F. "Lost Opportunity" to Fix Problems at Abu Ghraib (U)
1. Retired Army Intelligence Officer Leads Assessment Team (U)
2. Assessment Team Visits Abu Ghraib and CJTF-7 Headquarters (U)
3. Team Hears Reports of Detainee Mistreatment (U)
4. COL Herrington Reports Findings (U)
• XIV. Interrogation Policies Following Abu Ghraib (U)
o A. February 2004 CJSOTF Interrogation SOP (U)
o B. Interrogation Plan in Iraq Derived from SERE (U)
o C. March 2004 Interrogation SOPfor Conventional Forces in Afghanistan (U)
o D. Special Mission Unit Task Force Interrogation Polices (U)
• XV. CENTCOM Seeks JPRA Interrogation Assistance in Afghanistan (U)
o A. May 2004 CENTCOM Request (U)
o B. CENTCOM Makes Another Request for JPRA Interrogation Assistance in Afghanistan (U)
o C. U.S. Joint Forces Command Issues Policy Guidance For JPRA "Offensive" Support (U)
• The Origins of aggressive interrogation techniques: Part I of the Committee's inquiry into the treatment of detainees in U.S. custody -- Index of Documents
o (Tab 1 - EXTRACTS) July 25, 2002 Memorandum from JPRA Chief of Staff for Office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel, Subject: Exploitation.
o (Tab 2 - EXTRACTS) July 26, 2002 Memorandum from JPRA Chief of Staff for Office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel, Subject: Exploitation and Physical Pressures.
o (Tab 3 - EXTRACTS) July 25, 2002 document entitled "Physical Pressures used in Resistance Training and Against American Prisoners and Detainees." Attached to JPRA Memorandum of July 26, 2002.
o (Tab 4 - July 24, 2002 Memorandum from Chief of Psychology Services at the 336th Training Support Squadron, Surgeon General Flight to JPRA Chief of Staff. Attached to JPRA Memorandum of July 26, 2002.
o (Tab 5) August 1, 2002 Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Memorandum for Alberto Gonzales, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340-2340A.
o (Tab 6 - EXTRACTS) September 27, 2002 USSOUTHCOM (Office of the Staff Judge Advocate) document entitled "Trip Report, DoD General Counsel Visit to GTMO."
o (Tab 7) October 24, 2002 email between DoD CITF Personnel, Subject: FW: Counter Resistance Strategy Meeting Minutes [Minutes of an October 2, 2002 meeting at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba].
o (Tab 8) October, 11 2002 Memorandum from MG Michael Dunlavey to Commander USSOUTHCOM, Subject: Counter-Resistance Strategies. Two Attachments: JTF-170 J2 Memo, Subject: Request for Approval of Counter-Resistance Strategies and JTF-170 SJA Memo, Subject: Legal Brief on Proposed Counter-Resistance Strategies.
o (Tab 9) October 25, 2002 Transmittal Memorandum from USSOUTHCOM (General Hill) to Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques.
o (Tab 10) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Headquarters U.S. Air Force to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 11) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Criminal Investigative Task Force (CITF) to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 12) November 7, 2002 Memorandum from Headquarters, Department of the Army to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 13) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Chief of Naval Operations to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM I GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 14) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Headquarters United States Marine Corps to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 15) November 27, 2002 Memorandum from William J. Haynes (DoD GC) to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques.
o (Tab 16) (First Page and EXTRACTS) December 18, 2002 "JTF GTMO 'SERE' Interrogation Standard Operating Procedure."
o (Tab 17) December 17, 2002 Memorandum from CJTF Memorandum to the JTF-GTMO J-2, Subject: "JTF GTMO 'SERE' Interrogation SOP."
o (Tab 18) July 7, 2004 Memorandum from Alberto Mora for Inspector General, Department of the Navy, Subject: Statement for the Record of Alberto Mora for the Department of the Navy Inspector General.
o (Tab 19) January 15, 2003 Memorandum from Navy SERE School Training Specialist and SERE Coordinator to Officer in Charge, Subject: After Action Report, Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay (JTF GTMO) Training Evolution.
o (Tab 20) January 15, 2003 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to the USSOUTHCOM Commander; January 15, 2003 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to USSOUTHCOM Commander to DoD General Cousel William J. Haynes.
o (Tab 21) March 14, 2003 Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Memorandum from John Yoo to William J. Haynes, Re: Military Interrogations of Alien Unlawful Combatants Held Outside of the United States.
o (Tab 22) April 4, 2003 Working Group Report on Detainee Interrogations in the Global War on Terrorism: Assessment of Legal, Historical, Policy, and Operational Considerations.
o (Tab 23) April 16, 2003 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to USSOUTHCOM Commander, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques in the War on Terrorism.
o (Tab 24) September 29, 2004 Memorandum from MG Soligan, Chief of Staff, JFCOM for Commander, JPRA, Subject: JPRA Mission Guidance.
o (Tab 25) February 10, 2005, Memorandum from LTG Wagner, Deputy Commander, JFCOM for the Department of Defense Inspector General.
INQUIRY INTO THE TREATMENT OF DETAINEES IN U.S. CUSTODY-- REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, UNITED STATES SENATE
110th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print
November 20, 2008
Table of Contents
Note on Source Material Used in the Preparation of the Report (U)
List of Acronyms Used in the Report (U)
Executive Summary and Conclusions (U)
• I. Early Influences on Interrogation Policy (U)
o A. Redefining the Legal Framework For the Treatment of Detainees (U)
o B. Department of Defense Office of General Counsel Seeks Information from the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA) (U)
o C. JPRA Collaboration with Other Government Agencies (OGAs) (U)
o D. JPRA Support to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) (U)
o E. JPRA Recommendations for GTMO (U)
o F. Colonel Herrington's Assessment of GTMO (U)
o G. JPRA Prepares Draft Exploitation Plan (U)
• II. Development of New Interrogation Authorities (U)
o A. CIA's Interrogation Program and the Interrogation of Abu Zubaydah (U)
o B. JPRA Assistance to Another Government Agency (U)
o C. Senior SERE Psychologist Detailed From Department of Defense to Other Government Agency (U)
o D. Department of Defense General Counsel Seeks Information on SERE Techniques From JPRA (U)
o E. The Department of Justice Changes the Rules (U)
o F. JPRA 's Special Program In Support of [delete] (U)
1. August 2002 Training Proposal (U)
2. JPRA Creates Project 22B (U)
• III. Guantanamo Bay as a "Battle Lab" for New Interrogation Techniques (U)
o A. GTMO Stands Up a Behavioral Science Consultation Team (BSCT) (U)
o B. Behavioral Science Consultation Team (BSCT) Personnel Contact the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) (U)
o C. U.S. Southern Command Seeks External Review of GTMO (U)
o D. GTMO Personnel Attend Training at Fort Bragg (U)
o E. Delegation of Senior Government Lawyers Visits Guantanamo (U)
o F. JTF-170 BSCT Produces Interrogation Policy Memo (U)
o G. CIA Lawyer Advises GTMO on Interrogations (U)
o H. DoD Takes Lead on the Interrogation of Mohammed al Khatani (U)
• IV. GTMO Seeks Authority to Use Aggressive Interrogation Techniques (U)
o A. GTMO Requests Counter-Resistance Techniques Influenced by SERE (U)
o B. GTMO Staff Judge Advocate Conducts "Legal Review of Aggressive Interrogation Techniques" (U)
o C. Chain of Command Considers the Requestfor Interrogation Techniques as CITF and FBI Raise Objections (U)
o D. Military Services React to GTMO Requestfor Interrogation Techniques (U)
o E. Department of Defense General Counsel Quashes Joint Staff Legal Review (U)
o F. GTMO and JPRA Plan for Additional Interrogation Training (U)
• V. Command Change at Guantanamo as Dispute over Aggressive Techniques Continues (U)
o A. Major General Geoffrey Miller Takes Command of JTF-GTMO (U)
o B. Khatani Interrogation Plan Fuels Dispute Over Aggressive Techniques (U)
1. JTF-GTMO Staff Circulate Khatani Interrogation Plan (U)
2. CITF and FBI Object to Proposed Interrogation Techniques (U)
3. JTF-GTMO Briefs DoD General Counsel's Office on Interrogation Plan (U)
4. "Final" Khatani Interrogation Plan (U)
5. FBI and ClTF Continue to Object to Khatani Interrogation Plan (U)
6. Khatani Interrogation Begins, CITF Directed To "Stand Clear" (U)
7. Techniques Used During Khatani Interrogation (U)
• VI. JPRA's Assistance to Another Government Agency (U)
• VII. Secretary Rumsfeld Approves Interrogation Authorities, GTMOPlans to Implement SERE Techniques (U)
o A. Secretary of Defense Authorizes Aggressive Techniques for use at GTMO (U)
o B. JTF-GTMO Develops Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Use of SERE Techniques in Interrogations (U)
o C. SERE School Trainers Provide Instruction for GTMO Interrogators (U)
o D. Navy General Counsel Raises Concerns About Interrogation Techniques, Secretary Rumsfeld Rescinds Authority (U)
o E. National Security Council (NSC) Principals Discuss DoD Interrogations (U)
• VIII. New Interrogation Policy Developed for GTMO (U)
o A. The Working Group Solicits Information on Interrogation Techniques
1. The Defense Intelligence Agency Provides Information on Specific Interrogation Techniques (U)
2. The Working Group Solicits Information About Interrogation Techniques From CENTCOM and SOUTHCOM (U)
3. The Working Group Requests Information from JPRA (U)
o B. Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel's Analysis Is Presented As Controlling Authority (U)
o C. Working Group Drafts Report Recommending Interrogation Techniques (U)
o D. SOUTHCOM Presses for Additional Techniques (U)
o E. JPRA Briefs Members of the Working Group on SERE Techniques, Including Physical Pressures (U)
o F. The Working Group Finalizes Its Report and the Secretary of Defense Issues a New Interrogation Policy For GTMO (U)
• IX. Aggressive Interrogations at GTMO (U)
o A. Allegations of Detainee Mistreatment (U)
o B. Special Interrogation Plans Modeled on Khatani Interrogation (U)
1. JTF-GTMO Plans for Interrogation of Slahi (U)
2. JTF-GTMO Formally Submits Special Interrogation Planfor Slahi (ISN 760) (U)
3. Interrogation Begins Before the Special Interrogation Plan Is Approved (U)
4. Special Interrogation Plan Approved and Implemented Despite Apparent Cooperation (U)
5. FBI Concerns with Special Interrogation (U)
6. Special Project at GTMO Uses Aggressive Interrogation Techniques (U)
7. CITF Reissues Order for Agents to "Stand Clear" of Aggressive Interrogations (U)
8. GTMO Seeks Approval for Two Additional Special Interrogation Plans (U)
a. Special Interrogation Plan #3 (U)
b. Special Interrogation Plan #4 (U)
c. SOUTHCOM and OSD SO/LIC Recommend Approval of Special Interrogation Plans #3 & #4 (U)
• X. DOJ Office of Legal Counsel Withdraws March 14, 2003 Legal Opinion Governing DoD Interrogations (U)
• XI. Development of Interrogation Policy in Afghanistan (U)
o A. Assessment Team Visit to Guantanamo Bay (U)
o B. The Deaths of Dilawar and Habibullah (U)
o C. Questions Raised About Task Force Participation in OGA Interrogations (U)
o D. January 2003 Task Force Interrogation SOP (Afghanistan) (U)
o E. CJTF-180 Produces Memorandum on Interrogation Techniques (U)
o F. CENTCOM Raises Concerns About Interrogation Techniques (U)
• XII. Development of Interrogation Policy in Iraq (U)
o A. Special Mission Unit Task Force Interrogation Policies (U)
1. SMU Task Force Uses Afghanistan Interrogation Policy (U)
2. OGA Comments on SMU TF Interrogation Techniques (U)
3. July 2003 Interrogation SOP Drafted for Iraq SMU TF (U)
4. Iraq Survey Group Concerns with SMU TF Detainee Treatment (U)
o B. Interrogation Policies for Conventional Forces in Iraq (U)
1. CJTF-7 Stands Up (Summer 2003) (U)
2. Interrogation Operations Begin at Abu Ghraib (U)
3. 519th MI Battalion at Abu Ghraib Seeks Additional Guidance (U)
4. 519th MI BN Proposes Interrogation Policy (U)
5. CJTF-7 Solicits "Wish List" of Interrogation Techniques (U)
6. Interrogation OIC at Abu Ghraib Resubmits the Proposed Interrogation Policy for 519th MI BN (U)
o C. JPRA Provides "Offensive" SERE Training in Iraq (U)
1. Special Mission Unit Task Force in Iraq Seeks Assistance from JPRA (U)
2. Awareness of the JPRA Trip to Iraq at Headquarters, Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) (U)
3. JPRA Provides Interrogation Support to the Special Mission Unit Task Force in Iraq (U)
4. JPRA Team Authorized to Participate in Interrogations (U)
5. JPRA Present as Interrogator Uses Stress Positions and Slaps (U)
6. JPRA Team Authorized to Use SERE Techniques (U)
7. JPRA Team Chief Seeks Legal Guidance (U)
8. JPRA Training Manager and Contractor Participate in an Interrogation (U)
9. JPRA Team Chief Objects to SMU TF Interrogation (U)
10. JPRA Develops a Concept of Operations (CONOP) (U)
11. JPRA Team Leaves Iraq (U)
12. U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) Reviews JPRA Concept Of Operations (CONOP) (U)
13. JFCOM Verifies Team Chief's Account of Events in Iraq (U)
o D. Major General Geoffrey Miller Leads GTMO Assessment Team to Iraq (U)
1. CJTF-7 Commander Identifies Deficiencies (U)
2. GTMO Assessment Team Travels to Iraq (U)
3. GTMO Team Visits Iraq Survey Group (ISG) (U)
4. GTMO Team Visits Special Mission Unit Task Force (U)
5. GTMO Team Discusses Interrogations with CJTF-7 (U)
6. GTMO Commander Recommends CJTF-7 Develop an Interrogation Policy (U)
7. JTF-GTMO Assessment Team Produces Trip Report (U)
8. MG Miller Briefs Senior DoD Officials on Assessment Visit (U)
o E. Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy Established (U)
1. CJTF-7 Commander Issues Policy Including Aggressive Interrogation Techniques (U)
2. Interrogation and Counter Resistance Policy Implemented at Abu Ghraib (U)
3. CENTCOM Raises Concerns About CJTF-7 Policy (U)
4. CJTF-7 Issues New Interrogation Policy (U)
o F. SMU Task Force Issues a New Interrogation SOP (U)
o Footnotes
• XIII. Interrogation Techniques and Detainee Mistreatment at Abu Ghraib (U)
o A. Use of Military Working Dogs (U)
o B. Stress Positions and Physical Training (U)
o C. Removal of Clothing (U)
o D. Sleep Adjustment/Sleep Management (U)
o E. Sensory Deprivation and Isolation (U)
o F. "Lost Opportunity" to Fix Problems at Abu Ghraib (U)
1. Retired Army Intelligence Officer Leads Assessment Team (U)
2. Assessment Team Visits Abu Ghraib and CJTF-7 Headquarters (U)
3. Team Hears Reports of Detainee Mistreatment (U)
4. COL Herrington Reports Findings (U)
• XIV. Interrogation Policies Following Abu Ghraib (U)
o A. February 2004 CJSOTF Interrogation SOP (U)
o B. Interrogation Plan in Iraq Derived from SERE (U)
o C. March 2004 Interrogation SOPfor Conventional Forces in Afghanistan (U)
o D. Special Mission Unit Task Force Interrogation Polices (U)
• XV. CENTCOM Seeks JPRA Interrogation Assistance in Afghanistan (U)
o A. May 2004 CENTCOM Request (U)
o B. CENTCOM Makes Another Request for JPRA Interrogation Assistance in Afghanistan (U)
o C. U.S. Joint Forces Command Issues Policy Guidance For JPRA "Offensive" Support (U)
• The Origins of aggressive interrogation techniques: Part I of the Committee's inquiry into the treatment of detainees in U.S. custody -- Index of Documents
o (Tab 1 - EXTRACTS) July 25, 2002 Memorandum from JPRA Chief of Staff for Office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel, Subject: Exploitation.
o (Tab 2 - EXTRACTS) July 26, 2002 Memorandum from JPRA Chief of Staff for Office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel, Subject: Exploitation and Physical Pressures.
o (Tab 3 - EXTRACTS) July 25, 2002 document entitled "Physical Pressures used in Resistance Training and Against American Prisoners and Detainees." Attached to JPRA Memorandum of July 26, 2002.
o (Tab 4 - July 24, 2002 Memorandum from Chief of Psychology Services at the 336th Training Support Squadron, Surgeon General Flight to JPRA Chief of Staff. Attached to JPRA Memorandum of July 26, 2002.
o (Tab 5) August 1, 2002 Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Memorandum for Alberto Gonzales, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340-2340A.
o (Tab 6 - EXTRACTS) September 27, 2002 USSOUTHCOM (Office of the Staff Judge Advocate) document entitled "Trip Report, DoD General Counsel Visit to GTMO."
o (Tab 7) October 24, 2002 email between DoD CITF Personnel, Subject: FW: Counter Resistance Strategy Meeting Minutes [Minutes of an October 2, 2002 meeting at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba].
o (Tab 8) October, 11 2002 Memorandum from MG Michael Dunlavey to Commander USSOUTHCOM, Subject: Counter-Resistance Strategies. Two Attachments: JTF-170 J2 Memo, Subject: Request for Approval of Counter-Resistance Strategies and JTF-170 SJA Memo, Subject: Legal Brief on Proposed Counter-Resistance Strategies.
o (Tab 9) October 25, 2002 Transmittal Memorandum from USSOUTHCOM (General Hill) to Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques.
o (Tab 10) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Headquarters U.S. Air Force to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 11) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Criminal Investigative Task Force (CITF) to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 12) November 7, 2002 Memorandum from Headquarters, Department of the Army to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 13) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Chief of Naval Operations to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM I GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 14) November 4, 2002 Memorandum from Headquarters United States Marine Corps to Joint Staff: Review of SOUTHCOM/GTMO Request for Techniques.
o (Tab 15) November 27, 2002 Memorandum from William J. Haynes (DoD GC) to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques.
o (Tab 16) (First Page and EXTRACTS) December 18, 2002 "JTF GTMO 'SERE' Interrogation Standard Operating Procedure."
o (Tab 17) December 17, 2002 Memorandum from CJTF Memorandum to the JTF-GTMO J-2, Subject: "JTF GTMO 'SERE' Interrogation SOP."
o (Tab 18) July 7, 2004 Memorandum from Alberto Mora for Inspector General, Department of the Navy, Subject: Statement for the Record of Alberto Mora for the Department of the Navy Inspector General.
o (Tab 19) January 15, 2003 Memorandum from Navy SERE School Training Specialist and SERE Coordinator to Officer in Charge, Subject: After Action Report, Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay (JTF GTMO) Training Evolution.
o (Tab 20) January 15, 2003 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to the USSOUTHCOM Commander; January 15, 2003 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to USSOUTHCOM Commander to DoD General Cousel William J. Haynes.
o (Tab 21) March 14, 2003 Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Memorandum from John Yoo to William J. Haynes, Re: Military Interrogations of Alien Unlawful Combatants Held Outside of the United States.
o (Tab 22) April 4, 2003 Working Group Report on Detainee Interrogations in the Global War on Terrorism: Assessment of Legal, Historical, Policy, and Operational Considerations.
o (Tab 23) April 16, 2003 Memorandum from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to USSOUTHCOM Commander, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques in the War on Terrorism.
o (Tab 24) September 29, 2004 Memorandum from MG Soligan, Chief of Staff, JFCOM for Commander, JPRA, Subject: JPRA Mission Guidance.
o (Tab 25) February 10, 2005, Memorandum from LTG Wagner, Deputy Commander, JFCOM for the Department of Defense Inspector General.