ReferencesAdamic, L. A. & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 election: Divided they blog. Communications of the ACM, 36-43.
Altschuler, G. C., & Blumin, S. M. (2001). Rude Republic: Americans and Their Politics in the Nineteenth Century: Princeton University Press.
Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 67–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 1-16.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage: Cambridge University Press.
Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17–34). Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Cox, H. C. (1987). Verbal abuse in nursing: A report of a study, Nursing Management, 18, 47- 50.
Cox, H. C. (1991a). Verbal abuse nationwide, part 1: Oppressed group behavior. Nursing Management, 22, 32-35.
Cox, H. C. (1991b). Verbal abuse nationwide, part 2: Impact and modifications. Nursing Management, 22, 66-69.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 345-357.
Eagly, A. & Chaiken, S. (1993). Psychology of Attitudes. New York, HBJ.
Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5-24.
Funk, C. (2001). “Process Performance: Public Reaction to Legislative Policy Debate.” In J. R. Hibbing and E. Theiss-Morse (Eds.) What Is It About Government That Americans Dislike? (pp. 193–204). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gambaro, S., & Rabin, A. I. (1969). Diastolic blood pressure responses following direct and displaced aggression after anger arousal in high-and low-guilt subjects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 87-94.
Garramone, G. M. (1984). Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 250-259.
Gentry, W. D. (1970). Effects of frustration, attack, and prior aggressive training on overt aggression and vascular processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 718- 725.
Gentry, W. D. (1972). Biracial aggression: I. Effect of verbal attack and sex of victim. The Journal of Social Psychology, 88, 75-82.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hokanson, J. E. (1961). Vascular and psychogalvanic effects of experimentally aroused anger. Journal of Personality, 29, 30-39.
Holtgraves, T. (1997). Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 624–637.
Jessmer, S. L., & Anderson, D. (2001). The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 331-346.
Kashani, J. H., Burbach, D. J., & Rosenberg, T. K. (1988). Perception of family conflict resolution and depressive symptomatology in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 42-48.
King, A. B. (2001). Affective dimensions of Internet culture. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 414-430.
Kingwell, M. (1995). A Civil Tongue: justice, dialogue, and the politics of pluralism: Penn State Press.
Kinney, T. A., & Segrin, C. (1998). Cognitive moderators of negative reactions to verbal aggression. Communication studies, 49, 49-71.
Lee, H. (2005). Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 385-403.
Lerner, J. & Tetlock, P.E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1996). Using power/fighting power: The polity. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 46–66). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mendelberg, T. & Oleske, J. (2000). Race and public deliberation. Political Communication, 17, 169-191.
Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99, 1-15.
Mutz, D.C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mutz, D.C., & Martin, P.S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. The American Political Science Review, 95, 97-114.
Ng, E., & Detenber, B. H. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (3), article 4.
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/ng.htmlO’Reilly, T. (2007). Call for a blogger’s code of conduct. Retrieved Jan 30, 2007, from radar.oreilly.com Web site:
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/ ... log_1.htmlPapacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media and Society, 6, 259-283.
Phillips, T., & Smith, P. (2004). Emotional and behavioural responses to everyday incivility: Challenging the fear/avoidance paradigm. Journal of Sociology, 40, 378-399.
Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions. Communication Theory, 16, 47-74.
Rainie, L., & Horrigan, J. (2007). Election 2006 Online. Report from the Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Rule, B. G., & Hewitt, L. S. (1971). Effects of thwarting on cardiac response and physical aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 181-187.
Segrin, C., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1992). Depression and verbal aggressiveness in different marital couple types. Communication Studies, 43, 79-91.
Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Talmadge, J. (1987). The Flamers Bible. Retrieved October 29, 2007, from
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/88q1/13785.8.htmlTesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 181-227.
Tesser, A., Martin, L. & Mendolia, M. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.) Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. (pp. 73-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Uslaner, E. M. (1993). The Decline of Comity in Congress: University of Michigan Press.
Vissing, Y. M., Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Harrop, J. W. (1991). Verbal aggression by parents and psychosocial problems of children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 223-238.
Warren, M. (1992). Democratic theory and self-transformation. American Political Science Review, 86, 8–23.
Warren, M. (1996). Deliberative democracy and authority. American Political Science Review, 90, 46-60.
Weger, H., & Aakhus, M. (2003). Arguing in internet chat rooms: Argumentative adaptations to chat room design and some consequences for public deliberation at a distance. Argumentation and Advocacy, 40, 23-39.