Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

This is a broad, catch-all category of works that fit best here and not elsewhere. If you haven't found it someplace else, you might want to look here.

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:55 am

Samuel Lucas Joshi [S.L. Joshi]
by Aravind Ganachari
Excerpt from Two Indian Revolutionary Associations Abroad: Some New Light on the Pan-Aryan Association and the Indo-Japanese Association

The Pan-Aryan Association was the earliest known Indian political association founded, in September 1906, in America, by two India's revolutionaries -- Samuel Lucas Joshi (1878-1940) and Mohammad Barkatulla (b. ? D. 1928).1 It was started in New York on the lines of Indian Home Rule League,2 with the purpose of making a common cause with the similar movement in Ireland. This was one of the first Indo-Irish endeavours for attaining their swaraj.3 About the same time, Joshi attended a meeting of the United Irish League delegated on 21 October 1906, to enlist the support of the Irish leaders. Further evidence of this is the fact that President of the Pan-Aryan Association was an Irishman named A.S. Dulin. Joshi became the Secretary of this Association. It seems, Joshi was assisted in this effort by George Fitzgerald 'Freeman, who edited the Gaelic American, a mouth-piece of Irish revolutionaries, and which espoused the cause of Indian independence,4 and John Devoy of Clan-na-Gael.

The first public meeting of the Pan-Aryan Association took place at the Hotel 'Martha Washington', N.Y., on 11 February 1907, which was presided over by A.S. Dulin, and speeches were delivered by S.L. Joshi, Mohd. Barkatulla and Indu Bhushan Dey Mazumdar,6 in which they emphasised British oppression and the new industrial movement in India. The report of this meeting, and the prospectus of the Association, was published by the Gaelic American in its issue of 2 March 1907. The aims and objectives of this Association could be thus summarised --

1. To secure Home Rule for India.

2. To carry on propaganda in the United States with a view to attain the same, and to bring India and America in closer contact.

3. To spread among the people of India a knowledge of the advantages of freedom and national unity.

4. To help the students from India, to educate and send them back, so that they may spread the message of liberal education and industrialism.

For achieving closer co-operation with the Irish leaders. S.L. Joshi attended a meeting of United Irish League In New York on 26 October 1906, in which Mr. Bulmer Hobson of Belfast was the principal speaker. The meeting was stated to have been attended by over 2,500 people including every active Irish and Indian nationalist in New York. After Bulmer Hobson spoke on "the Aim, Methods and Working of the Sinn Fein Movement",7 Joshi spoke on the Swadeshi movement in India, and pointed out that It was similar to the one mentioned by Hobson, started for the purpose of achieving emancipation, political and economic, from a common enemy, the English. He also pointed out the economic ruin that was brought about by the English rule In India, and said, "we feel that Ireland's cause is our own, and our hearts are knit with the hearts of Ireland".8 At the close of the meeting, resolution was passed which ran thus:

"We extend to the people of India our sympathy and good-will in their struggle for the recovery of their independence, and we congratulate them on the splendid progress they have made through the Swadeshi movement in the revival of industries which have been destroyed by England, and which are a necessity in the national life. We hope and pray that India and Ireland may march side by side to complete in absolute freedom".


Joshi and Barkatulla's close contacts with Shyamji Krishna Verma, Mrs Bhikaiji Rustom, K.R. Cama, and the India Home Rule League of London, can be understood from the report of the second Annual General Meeting of the Indian Home Rule League, held on 23 February 1907, published by Shyamji Krishna Verma in Indian Sociologist. The report applauded the establishment of the Pan-Aryan Association by their 'friends and sympathisers.'9

In October 1907, Mrs. Cama, the well known Indian revolutionary abroad, arrived in New York. She was put up in the Hotel 'Martha Washington', from where the Pan-Aryan Association functioned. Her interview was published in New York Sun of 20 October 1907, in which she exposes the British oppression in India. It also mentions that S.L. Joshi was present at that time. Mrs. Cama's lectures were arranged under the auspices of the Pan-Aryan Association.10

It must be noted here that Myron H. Phelps, an Irish American, also organised Indo-American National Association on 5 September 1907, and Society for the Advancement of India in November 1907, in New York for similar purposes.11 It seems, Phelps' effort to unite his Association with the Pan-Aryan Association did not succeed. In the opinion of police report, it was because Joshi and Barkatulla were jealous of Phelps' position and influence rather than any divergence of political views.12 Interestingly, a letter signed by six Bengali students, which appeared in the Bande Mataram of Calcutta in its issue of 11 April 1908, regretted Phelps' arbitrary manner in running his Society, without desiring the active cooperation of any of their representative leaders, and expressed their intention of joining the Pan-Aryan Association.13 This showed the influence of the Pan-Aryan Association on Indian students studying in America.

The biographical sketch of Samuel Lucas Joshi and Mohd. Barkatulla is very scant. A few facts about them, culled from the Police 'secret' files and the contemporary records, may be briefly stated.

S.L. Joshi14 was born in 1874, at Buldhana, in Maharashtra (then in Berar). His father, Rev. Lucas Mahoba Joshi, was connected with the Church Mission Society, for more than forty years. S.L. Joshi lived at Nasik from 1876 to 1888. He completed High School education at Aurangbad. From 1890 to 1895, he studied for B.A. degree at the Nizam College, Hyderabad. During most of this time, he lived with the Rev. M.G. Goldsmith of Church Mission Society. After taking his degree, he went to Bombay in 1896, and was employed in the Bombay Government secretariat. Later, he joined the office of the Bombay Presidency Magistrates' court, while studying law in the Bombay Government Law School. In 1899, he was appointed Head Master of the Church Mission Society's High Master at Hyderabad, Sind. In 1900, he went to Amballa as the Head Master of a High School. There he received an offer of a lecturership in Indian Languages in an American institution for training for intending missionaries. He left for America in August 1902. The institution where Joshi was working in America having changed hands, he came to New York where he made his living by lecturing on India for the New York Board of Education, and also as representative of the Foreign Missions Industrial Association. In this capacity, he lectured extensively on the need for reviving Indian industries on modern scientific lines.

When the work of this mission was given up for want of funds, Joshi turned to research work at Columbia University, where he took his M.A. degree in 1905. It was during his lecturing on Indian industries that Joshi seems to have become interested in revolutionary activities.

Very little is known about Mohd. Barkatulla's early life, and also about his family. He was probably born around 1870.15 He went to U.S.A. towards the end of 19th century, and gradually became involved in the incipient Indian revolutionary movement there. He, more than Joshi, seems to have been in close contact with the Indian revolutionaries like Shyamji Krishna Verma, Mrs. Cama, Sardar Rewasingji Rana, and others.

In 1908, Surendra Mohan Bose, who had come from Japan, Gurudatta Kumar, and Tarak Nath Das, had started publishing Free Hindustan, a bi-monthly journal from Vancouver, British Canada, a close imitation of Indian Sociologist of S.K. Verma. Due to pressure of British administration there, it was moved to Seattle in Autumn 1908, and then to New York. George Freeman, S .L. Joshi, and Barkatulla are said to have played a major role in having Free Hindustan published from New York. However, its publication abruptly ended in 1910.

The activities of the Pan-Aryan Association came to an end around February 1909. Even Phelps had to close down his Association and India House in New York around the same time. The reason could be that William Jennings Bryan, who was Governor of Nebraska, and later became Woodrow Wilson's Secretary of State in 1916, castigated the British rule in India by comparing it with Czarist rule in Russia. The British Foreign Office showed total displeasure to the US administration at such utterances of Bryan. It was with a view to achieve US-British friendship, President Theodore Roosevelt countered Bryan's views on India16 and suppressed, at the instance of British Government, all kinds of pro-Indian activities in New York.17

While Mohd. Barkatulla left for Tokyo in March 1909, S.L. Joshi took up a teaching assignment in Maharaja College in Baroda State. When the Government of India objected through the Political Resident, Joshi disclaimed his earlier association with Mrs. Cama and others, and thereafter, the political intelligence did not keep track of his activities. After some years, he was allowed to take up Carnegie Exchange Professorship in America. During 1926-1936, he was the Head of the Department for Comparative Religions and Indian Philosophy at Dartmouth College. He died on 16 June 1940 at Chicago.18 During this period, he helped many Indian students who went to America for higher education.

_______________

Notes:

1. Bombay Presidency Abstracts of Intelligence (hereinafter BPPAI). Year 1910 / Vol. XXIII / No. 11 / 19 March / Para-758.

2. The Indian Home Rule Society was formed by about twenty Indians, under the leadership of Shyamji Krishna Verma on 18 February 1905, in London on lines of Irish Home Rule League Society. For details see Indulal Yajnik: Shyamji Krishna Verma, Bombay, 1950. 130-133.

3. One of the earliest links between Irish and Indian patriots was that an Indian student named Camille F. Saidhana was helped, in May 1906, by the Clan-na-Gael to go to Dublin to establish contacts with the Sinn Fein leaders. Arun Kumar Bose: Indian Revolutionaries Abroad, 1905-1922, Patna, 1971, 38.

4. George Freeman and John Devoy seem to have been in touch with Mrs. Cama in Paris regarding smuggling of arms. DCI on 9 March 1915, Home-Political, 1915-April, 412-15 B, source quoted by Arun Kumar Bose. Ibid, 48.

5. Clan-na-Gael was a revolutionary society established by a group of Irish Americans called Fenians in the second half of the 19th century. This Society under John Devoy had proclaimed its political alliance with Indian revolutionaries. The Gaelic American was banned by the Government of India in 1907.

6. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.11 / Para 758: A letter from Mrs. Cama to Indu Bhushan Dey, which the police intercepted.,made them interrogate him and check his luggage on his arrival at Bombay in 1910. He gave following information about himself to the police. He was studying in Cornell University and had same tendencies with many other Indians abroad, and that he has now given up such ideas. He travelled some time with Prince Victor of Cooch Bihar and undertook his last trip to America, Egypt and Turkey at the expense of the Cooch Bihar State. The correspondence found with him revealed his association with Mrs. Cama, Barkatulla, Myron H. Phelps and other extremists. A photo of S.L. Joshi and a group photo with Myron Phelps was also found. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.9 / 5 March / Para 596.

7. Sinn Fein, meaning "We Ourself," Irish nationalist party founded by Arthur Griffith (1872-1922). In 1905, it was extremist outfit, later became the political wing of Irish Republican Party.

8. BPPAI / XXIII / No.47 / 3 Dec. / Para 758.:

9. Ibid.

10. Ibid.

11. Aravind Gururao Ganachari. "Myron H. Phelps (1856-1916): An Early American Advocate of India's Freedom," PIHC, 52nd Session, New Delhi, 1991-92, 650-651.

12. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.47 / 3 December / Para-3197.

13. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.24 / 18 June / Para-1820.

14. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.47 / 3 December / Para-3197. History sheet of S.L. Joshi. Photograph of S.L. Joshi in BPPAI / 1909, 758.

15. Arun Kumar Bose. op. cit., 253.

16. President Theodore Roosevelt countered Bryan's views on India. In his speech delivered at the Metropolitan Memorial Methodist Church at Washington on 18 January 1908.

17. At this time, the India Office In London as well as the Government of India were extremely watchful of the activities of the Indian revolutionaries and their foreign collaborators abroad. Dunlop Smith, who was a close confidant of Lord Minto in the India Office, then headed by Lord Morley, made discreet inquiries whether any Irish Society or any other organisation was supporting Indian revolutionaries. Minto Papers, Correspondence - Eng. & Ind., L & T. Vol. II. No. 7. Dunlop Smith to Lord Minto. dt. 12 July 1907. Quoted by M.N. Das: India Under Morley and Minto, London, 1963, 115- 16.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:10 am

Two Indian Revolutionary Associations Abroad: Some New Light on the Pan-Aryan Association and the Indo-Japanese Association
by Aravind Ganachari (LM00176)

The Pan-Aryan Association in the United States of America and the Indo-Japanese Association in Japan are the two earliest political associations started by Indians in those respective countries. While the existing works on Indian revolutionaries abroad make passing reference to the Pan Aryan Association of U.S.A., there is hardly any account of the Indian revolutionary activity in Japan prior to the activities of Rash Behari Bose. This paper, which is primarily based on the Bombay Presidency Police Abstracts of Intelligence, seeks to throw some new light on these Indian revolutionary associations and evaluate their contribution to India's freedom struggle.

I

The Pan-Aryan Association was the earliest known Indian political association founded, in September 1906, in America, by two India's revolutionaries -- Samuel Lucas Joshi (1878-1940) and Mohammad Barkatulla (b. ? D. 1928).1 It was started in New York on the lines of Indian Home Rule League,2 with the purpose of making a common cause with the similar movement in Ireland. This was one of the first Indo-Irish endeavours for attaining their swaraj.3 About the same time, Joshi attended a meeting of the United Irish League delegated on 21 October 1906, to enlist the support of the Irish leaders. Further evidence of this is the fact that President of the Pan-Aryan Association was an Irishman named A.S. Dulin. Joshi became the Secretary of this Association. It seems, Joshi was assisted in this effort by George Fitzgerald 'Freeman, who edited the Gaelic American, a mouth-piece of Irish revolutionaries, and which espoused the cause of Indian independence,4 and John Devoy of Clan-na-Gael.

The first public meeting of the Pan-Aryan Association took place at the Hotel 'Martha Washington', N.Y., on 11 February 1907, which was presided over by A.S. Dulin, and speeches were delivered by S.L. Joshi, Mohd. Barkatulla and Indu Bhushan Dey Mazumdar,6 in which they emphasised British oppression and the new industrial movement in India. The report of this meeting, and the prospectus of the Association, was published by the Gaelic American in its issue of 2 March 1907. The aims and objectives of this Association could be thus summarised --

1. To secure Home Rule for India.

2. To carry on propaganda in the United States with a view to attain the same, and to bring India and America in closer contact.

3. To spread among the people of India a knowledge of the advantages of freedom and national unity.

4. To help the students from India, to educate and send them back, so that they may spread the message of liberal education and industrialism.

For achieving closer co-operation with the Irish leaders. S.L. Joshi attended a meeting of United Irish League In New York on 26 October 1906, in which Mr. Bulmer Hobson of Belfast was the principal speaker. The meeting was stated to have been attended by over 2,500 people including every active Irish and Indian nationalist in New York. After Bulmer Hobson spoke on "the Aim, Methods and Working of the Sinn Fein Movement",7 Joshi spoke on the Swadeshi movement in India, and pointed out that It was similar to the one mentioned by Hobson, started for the purpose of achieving emancipation, political and economic, from a common enemy, the English. He also pointed out the economic ruin that was brought about by the English rule In India, and said, "we feel that Ireland's cause is our own, and our hearts are knit with the hearts of Ireland".8 At the close of the meeting, resolution was passed which ran thus:

"We extend to the people of India our sympathy and good-will in their struggle for the recovery of their independence, and we congratulate them on the splendid progress they have made through the Swadeshi movement in the revival of industries which have been destroyed by England, and which are a necessity in the national life. We hope and pray that India and Ireland may march side by side to complete in absolute freedom".


Joshi and Barkatulla's close contacts with Shyamji Krishna Verma, Mrs Bhikaiji Rustom, K.R. Cama, and the India Home Rule League of London, can be understood from the report of the second Annual General Meeting of the Indian Home Rule League, held on 23 February 1907, published by Shyamji Krishna Verma in Indian Sociologist. The report applauded the establishment of the Pan-Aryan Association by their 'friends and sympathisers.'9

In October 1907, Mrs. Cama, the well known Indian revolutionary abroad, arrived in New York. She was put up in the Hotel 'Martha Washington', from where the Pan-Aryan Association functioned. Her interview was published in New York Sun of 20 October 1907, in which she exposes the British oppression in India. It also mentions that S.L. Joshi was present at that time. Mrs. Cama's lectures were arranged under the auspices of the Pan-Aryan Association.10

It must be noted here that Myron H. Phelps, an Irish American, also organised Indo-American National Association on 5 September 1907, and Society for the Advancement of India in November 1907, in New York for similar purposes.11 It seems, Phelps' effort to unite his Association with the Pan-Aryan Association did not succeed. In the opinion of police report, it was because Joshi and Barkatulla were jealous of Phelps' position and influence rather than any divergence of political views.12 Interestingly, a letter signed by six Bengali students, which appeared in the Bande Mataram of Calcutta in its issue of 11 April 1908, regretted Phelps' arbitrary manner in running his Society, without desiring the active cooperation of any of their representative leaders, and expressed their intention of joining the Pan-Aryan Association.13 This showed the influence of the Pan-Aryan Association on Indian students studying in America.

The biographical sketch of Samuel Lucas Joshi and Mohd. Barkatulla is very scant. A few facts about them, culled from the Police 'secret' files and the contemporary records, may be briefly stated.

S.L. Joshi14 was born in 1874, at Buldhana, in Maharashtra (then in Berar). His father, Rev. Lucas Mahoba Joshi, was connected with the Church Mission Society, for more than forty years. S.L. Joshi lived at Nasik from 1876 to 1888. He completed High School education at Aurangbad. From 1890 to 1895, he studied for B.A. degree at the Nizam College, Hyderabad. During most of this time, he lived with the Rev. M.G. Goldsmith of Church Mission Society. After taking his degree, he went to Bombay in 1896, and was employed in the Bombay Government secretariat. Later, he joined the office of the Bombay Presidency Magistrates' court, while studying law in the Bombay Government Law School. In 1899, he was appointed Head Master of the Church Mission Society's High Master at Hyderabad, Sind. In 1900, he went to Amballa as the Head Master of a High School. There he received an offer of a lecturership in Indian Languages in an American institution for training for intending missionaries. He left for America in August 1902. The institution where Joshi was working in America having changed hands, he came to New York where he made his living by lecturing on India for the New York Board of Education, and also as representative of the Foreign Missions Industrial Association. In this capacity, he lectured extensively on the need for reviving Indian industries on modern scientific lines.

When the work of this mission was given up for want of funds, Joshi turned to research work at Columbia University, where he took his M.A. degree in 1905. It was during his lecturing on Indian industries that Joshi seems to have become interested in revolutionary activities.

Very little is known about Mohd. Barkatulla's early life, and also about his family. He was probably born around 1870.15 He went to U.S.A. towards the end of 19th century, and gradually became involved in the incipient Indian revolutionary movement there. He, more than Joshi, seems to have been in close contact with the Indian revolutionaries like Shyamji Krishna Verma, Mrs. Cama, Sardar Rewasingji Rana, and others.

In 1908, Surendra Mohan Bose, who had come from Japan, Gurudatta Kumar, and Tarak Nath Das, had started publishing Free Hindustan, a bi-monthly journal from Vancouver, British Canada, a close imitation of Indian Sociologist of S.K. Verma. Due to pressure of British administration there, it was moved to Seattle in Autumn 1908, and then to New York. George Freeman, S .L. Joshi, and Barkatulla are said to have played a major role in having Free Hindustan published from New York. However, its publication abruptly ended in 1910.

The activities of the Pan-Aryan Association came to an end around February 1909. Even Phelps had to close down his Association and India House in New York around the same time. The reason could be that William Jennings Bryan, who was Governor of Nebraska, and later became Woodrow Wilson's Secretary of State in 1916, castigated the British rule in India by comparing it with Czarist rule in Russia. The British Foreign Office showed total displeasure to the US administration at such utterances of Bryan. It was with a view to achieve US-British friendship, President Theodore Roosevelt countered Bryan's views on India16 and suppressed, at the instance of British Government, all kinds of pro-Indian activities in New York.17

While Mohd. Barkatulla left for Tokyo in March 1909, S.L. Joshi took up a teaching assignment in Maharaja College in Baroda State. When the Government of India objected through the Political Resident, Joshi disclaimed his earlier association with Mrs. Cama and others, and thereafter, the political intelligence did not keep track of his activities. After some years, he was allowed to take up Carnegie Exchange Professorship in America. During 1926-1936, he was the Head of the Department for Comparative Religions and Indian Philosophy at Dartmouth College. He died on 16 June 1940 at Chicago.18 During this period, he helped many Indian students who went to America for higher education.

II

The striking and pre-eminent position which Japan had attained as one of the foremost nations of modern times, not only evoked admiration but stimulated the newly awakened Indian national sentiment and the spirit of industrial revival, during the extremist phase of Indian national movement. Maharashtra's connection with Japan began in the closing years of 19th century. B.G. Tilak's close associate, Vasukaka Joshi, proprietor of the Chitrashala Press, had wished to establish contacts with Japan through Nepal Government, and even visited Japan himself.19 Perhaps, it may be because of his efforts that Japanese Government came forward to give financial help to the draught stricken people in Maharashtra in 1900. The native newspapers in Maharashtra followed the Russo-Japanese War with unabated interest. It was Kesari, who in return to Japanese help earlier, undertook the task of giving pecuniary aid to the families of Japanese soldiers rendered destitute in the war, collected 'one-rupee' contribution in the Deccan and sent Rs. 2000/- to the Yokohama Specie Bank,20 which accounts their later help.

One of the earliest who went to Japan in 1899, was Krishnaji Dadaji alias Kedba Kulkarni, a member of the secret society named Shivaji Club of Kolhapur. in Maharashtra. While most of these used to go to Japan to learn mach-box or glass manufacturing, a few of them used to acquire the knowledge of bomb-making21 and on their return used to secretly help the armed revolutionaries.

Many students. mostly from Maharashtra, Bengal, Baroda, Madras and Mysore, followed K.D. Kulkarni. Around 1906, there were as many as 50 of them on Tokyo alone. Most of them were students of Tokyo Higher Technological School, the Tokyo and Kyoto Imperial Universities and the Sapparo Agricultural College. A few others acquired knowledge at factories of various kind. Their Japanese colleagues respected them for their intelligence. The mutual advantages of a closer connection between the two countries, especially in the field of commercial, industrial and educational activity was realised, and need for a properly organized agency was felt by these students. They had the good fortune of enlisting the warm sympathies of the foremost leaders of modern Japan including such celebrities as Count Okuma, one of the four 'elder-statesmen' (the Genro); the founders of industrial enterprise in Japan, i.e., Mr. Kondo, President of the Nippon Yusen Kaisha, and Baron Takahashi, President of the Yokohama Specie Bank. The result was the establishment of the Indo-Japanese Association In Tokyo.22 One of the chief supporters of this cause was R.D. Tata. The aims and objectives of this Association were:

1. To guide and help every possible way Indian students and others, proceeding to Japan for study or business.

2: To provide a building for the accommodation of Indian students for housing a suitably equipped library.

3. To create and foster In the intelligent classes of Japan, interest in Indian students. esp. in Indian commerce and industries, and to devise means for developing commerce and industry in India.

4. To spread the knowledge of Indian vernaculars among the educated classes of Japan.

5. To encourage intercourse between the two countries so as to bring the people into closer contact.23

One of those students who played a large part in the establishment of this Association was Govind Narayan Potdar,24 He had gone to Japan In 1903 and had remained till December 1908, to study Applied Chemistry. He, along with other students, started India House in Tokyo, similar to the one at London25 and branches were opened in Kyoto, Osaka, and in almost all industrial cities. Among other prominent students were, Surendra Mohan Bose, who later went to America, K.D. Kulkarni, L. Barthakur, S.C. Ray, S.C. Ghosh, J.J. Sawant, S.C. Bose, J.B. Bidyant, B.H. Khatao. Besides, many Indian business firms in Japan, seem to have lent all kinds of support to the activities of Indian students.26 Many of these after their return to India started swadeshi industries27 and some of them actively connected with the armed revolutionaries.

The arrival of Mohd. Barkatulla in February 1909, gave a shot in the arm to the anti-British political activities at India House. He took up the assignment of teaching Urdu at the Tokyo School for Foreign Languages. The statement given to the police after much interrogation by one Nanalal Pranshankar alias Kanchan Kumar, who had visited India House at Tokyo and other places in Japan, reveals the influence that Mohd. Barkatulla wielded.

"He (Barkatulla) is a good and spirited speaker. He speaks against the (British) Government, a man of strong political views ... From my travels through Japan, I came to the conclusion that in Tokyo Indian politics were freely discussed and that the Japanese took a lot of interest in them. I understood that Barkatulla was a great favourite of the Indians and the Japanese, and commanded immense influence ... He told me that the Japanese who were present for my lecture at the India House were the sons of military men. He said that India would regain her liberty one day through the combined assistance of China and Japan ... In my opinion, Barkatulla is the Shyamji Krishna Verma of Japan. He is friendly with the Captains of the Japanese steamers coming to and fro from India. Barkatulla carried on correspondence in cipher ... Savant, Gokhale and Mukharji know Japanese and are friends of Barkatulla ... 28

There is an interesting report from the D.C.I. Simla: "It has since been suggested that the arms which are being smuggled into India by the Japanese include rifles which are sent out in parts packed separately in merchandize". 29

It should be noted that before the First World War, a Japanese secret society named Shina Ronin, with its leader Toyama Mitsura, was actively supporting Indian revolutionaries. It also had the financial backing of Japanese Govemment30. Because of the growing anti-British and Pan-Aryan sentiment, the obvious self-interest of some Japanese commercial houses and seamen could be easily blended with their new imperialist ideals, and a substantial part of the illicit arms and ammunitions secured by the revolutionaries in India used to come from Kobe and Yokohama.31

On 1 August 1912, the Viceroy of India appealed to the Secretary of State to request the Japanese Government to put an end to the publication of the Islamic Fraternity, which Barkatulla edited from Tokyo.32 The governments of Gomble Yamamoto and Shigenobu Okuma wanted good relations with Britain, and so it was not possible for Indians in Japan to carry on an effective anti-British agitation, until the activities of Rash Behari Bose. Barkatulla left for San Francisco on 6 May 1914.33 The Indo-Japanese Association, which had become centre of anti-British political activity until 1914, again became apolitical organization.

_______________

Notes:

1. Bombay Presidency Abstracts of Intelligence (hereinafter BPPAI). Year 1910 / Vol. XXIII / No. 11 / 19 March / Para-758.

2. The Indian Home Rule Society was formed by about twenty Indians, under the leadership of Shyamji Krishna Verma on 18 February 1905, in London on lines of Irish Home Rule League Society. For details see Indulal Yajnik: Shyamji Krishna Verma, Bombay, 1950. 130-133.

3. One of the earliest links between Irish and Indian patriots was that an Indian student named Camille F. Saidhana was helped, in May 1906, by the Clan-na-Gael to go to Dublin to establish contacts with the Sinn Fein leaders. Arun Kumar Bose: Indian Revolutionaries Abroad, 1905-1922, Patna, 1971, 38.

4. George Freeman and John Devoy seem to have been in touch with Mrs. Cama in Paris regarding smuggling of arms. DCI on 9 March 1915, Home-Political, 1915-April, 412-15 B, source quoted by Arun Kumar Bose. Ibid, 48.

5. Clan-na-Gael was a revolutionary society established by a group of Irish Americans called Fenians in the second half of the 19th century. This Society under John Devoy had proclaimed its political alliance with Indian revolutionaries. The Gaelic American was banned by the Government of India in 1907.

6. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.11 / Para 758: A letter from Mrs. Cama to Indu Bhushan Dey, which the police intercepted.,made them interrogate him and check his luggage on his arrival at Bombay in 1910. He gave following information about himself to the police. He was studying in Cornell University and had same tendencies with many other Indians abroad, and that he has now given up such ideas. He travelled some time with Prince Victor of Cooch Bihar and undertook his last trip to America, Egypt and Turkey at the expense of the Cooch Bihar State. The correspondence found with him revealed his association with Mrs. Cama, Barkatulla, Myron H. Phelps and other extremists. A photo of S.L. Joshi and a group photo with Myron Phelps was also found. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.9 / 5 March / Para 596.

7. Sinn Fein, meaning "We Ourself," Irish nationalist party founded by Arthur Griffith (1872-1922). In 1905, it was extremist outfit, later became the political wing of Irish Republican Party.

8. BPPAI / XXIII / No.47 / 3 Dec. / Para 758.:

9. Ibid.

10. Ibid.

11. Aravind Gururao Ganachari. "Myron H. Phelps (1856-1916): An Early American Advocate of India's Freedom," PIHC, 52nd Session, New Delhi, 1991-92, 650-651.

12. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.47 / 3 December / Para-3197.

13. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.24 / 18 June / Para-1820.

14. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No.47 / 3 December / Para-3197. History sheet of S.L. Joshi. Photograph of S.L. Joshi in BPPAI / 1909, 758.

15. Arun Kumar Bose. op. cit., 253.

16. President Theodore Roosevelt countered Bryan's views on India. In his speech delivered at the Metropolitan Memorial Methodist Church at Washington on 18 January 1908.

17. At this time, the India Office In London as well as the Government of India were extremely watchful of the activities of the Indian revolutionaries and their foreign collaborators abroad. Dunlop Smith, who was a close confidant of Lord Minto in the India Office, then headed by Lord Morley, made discreet inquiries whether any Irish Society or any other organisation was supporting Indian revolutionaries. Minto Papers, Correspondence - Eng. & Ind., L & T. Vol. II. No. 7. Dunlop Smith to Lord Minto. dt. 12 July 1907. Quoted by M.N. Das: India Under Morley and Minto, London, 1963, 115-16.

18. The Times of India, 17 June 1940: Also. V.S. Joshi: Agnipathavaril Paragandha (Marathi), 1987, 156-7.

19. For details see. Y.D. Phadke: Lokmanya Tilak Ani Krantikarak (Marathi). Pune, 1985, 48-49. Their hopes of having help of Nepal Government were dashed as it was not ready to incur the displeasure of British Government In India.

20. Maharashtra State Archives / Political Department / Confidential 'A' Procedings for May 1905, No. 10 of 1905, dated 14 April 1905, 371-73.

21. K.D. alias Kedbe Kulkarni, an active member of the Shivaji Club, on his return to India by the end of 1906, joined the services of Gwalior State, from which he was dismissed in 1907. It was he who introduced Krishnaji Damodar Limaye, another member of the Shivaji Club, to G.N. Potdar to learn bomb making. From 1913, Kulkarni evaded warrant for arrest, was eventually arrested in 1918, and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment, in Phadke, op. cit., 49.

22. Printed note of the Indo-Japanese Association given by R.D. Tata to the police, in BPPAI / 1909 / XXII / No. 49 / 11 December / Para-2321.

23. Ibid.

24. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No. 17 / 30 April / Para-1194: The History sheet of G.N. Potdar describes him as an extremist and a protege of Dr. Moreshwar Gopal Deshmukh, Hon. Secretary of the Hindu Educational Fund of Bombay. Potdar was from Akalkot in Solapur Dist., studied in Nizam College, Hyderabad, and was graduated from University of Madras in 1903. The police described that Potdar learnt bomb-making in Japan and was close to revolutionaries from Bengal and Maharashtra. He was in close contact with Waman Baji Ruikar, who was connected to Belapur Swami Club, and Hotilal Verma, who was arrested in Bengal for revolutionary activities. Potdar, later started a monthly called India House Magazine, published from Bombay.

25. BPPAI / 1910 / XXIII / No. 49 / 11 December / Para-2321.

26. Ibid. The police report gives the list of 27 Indian firms in Tokyo and Yokohama alone, 11 in Kobe, and 7 in other industrial cities. Both the India House and these firms also gave loans to the students. The firms also helped the Indian visitors to Japan, in providing lodging and boarding.

27. Potdar started manufacture of sulphuric acid at Mahim and also helped the Talegaon Glass Factory. Balkrishna Hart Khatao started Belgaum Match Factory. Both were given financial help from the Paisa Fund started by Tilak.

28. BPPAI / 1914 / XXVII / No. 22 / 6 June / Para- 1058.

29. BPPAI / 1914 / XXVII / No.3 / 24 January / Para-121.

30. Don Dignan: Indian Revolutionary Problem in British Diplomacy, 1914-1919, New Delhi, 97.

31. R.P. Dua: The Impact of the Russo-Japanese (1905) War on Indian Politics, Delhi, 1966, 67-68.

32. The Islamic Fraternity, edited by Barkatulla, tried to unite the Islamic people of Turkey to make a common cause and fight the British. According to the Police, this monthly was a fanatically Pan-Islamic, but in the wider context it does not seem to be true. Before the Director of Foreign Languages and the Japanese Government warned Barkatulla, the publication of this paper had ceased on 12 Oct. 1912. He also wrote two revolutionary pamphlets, Akher al-Helal Saif, in Urdu and Proclamation of Liberty in English. For Barkatulla's later life see Dictionary of National Biography, Vo1. 1, edited by S.P. Sen. Calcutta, 1972, 139-140. Photograph of Barkatulla in BPPAI / 1913, p. 915. Group photo of India House in BPPAI / 1910, 748 does not give any information of Barkatulla's contribution to 'German Connection': Nirode K. Barooha, "Har Dayal and the German Connection," in IHR, Vol. VII, July 1980-Jan. 1981. Nos. 1-2, 184-211.

33. R.P. Dua, op. cit.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:17 am

United Irish League
by Wikipedia
Accessed: 6/5/20

United Irish League
Founded: 23 January 1898
Dissolved: 1920s
Ideology: Land Reform; Political Reform; Irish Home Rule

Image
William O'Brien, founder of the United Irish League

The United Irish League (UIL) was a nationalist political party in Ireland, launched 23 January 1898 with the motto "The Land for the People" .[1] Its objective to be achieved through agrarian agitation and land reform, compelling larger grazier farmers to surrender their lands for redistribution among the small tenant farmers. Founded and initiated at Westport, County Mayo by William O'Brien, it was supported by Michael Davitt MP, John Dillon MP, who worded its constitution, Timothy Harrington MP, John O'Connor Power MP and the Catholic clergy of the district.[2] By 1900 it had expanded to be represented by 462 branches in twenty-five counties.[3]

Background

In 1895 William O'Brien retired from Parliament and the Irish Parliamentary Party (IPP) in the wake of the Parnell split, by which the party became fragmented into three separate networks of local organisation—the Parnellite Irish National League, the Dillionite anti-Parnellite Irish National Federation and the Healyite Peoples Right's Association.[4] O’Brien had become disillusioned with the internal party quarrels and its failure to rouse the people to a new sense of involvement with national goals.[5] After O’Brien had withdrawn to the West of Ireland he experienced at first hand in his Mayo exile the plight of the peasant tenant farmers and landless labourers, their distressed hardship trying to eke out an existence in its rocky landscape. In contrast, the grazier ranches on the rich plains of Mayo, Roscommon and Galway were in the hands of local town shopkeepers, retired policemen, and other middle-class Irish elements.[6] They were, according to O'Brien, the real infernal evils, the so-called grasslands-grabbers, from whom the small tenant farmers were obliged to rent land for their needs. O'Brien saw the necessity to tackle the owners of these grazing ranches. He wanted to have the lands redistributed, a new idea at the time.

The land agitations during the 1880s saw the introduction of the Purchase of Land (Ireland) Act 1885, also known as the Ashbourne Act, which helped to eliminate the old cry of "land-grabbers" but since the 1890s the cry was supplemented by "grass-grabbers". O'Brien thus began to take the first steps in his new campaign of agrarian agitation that would ultimately establish peasant proprietorship. This prompted him to call for the introduction of a Land Bill with a provision for the compulsory purchase of untenanted grazier-ranches for distribution among tenants. The failure of the Conservative Government to provide for compulsory purchase under Balfour's 1891 Land Act, convinced O'Brien that something more than Parliamentary oratory was needed to encourage official circles to attend to the needs of the people.[7]

Objectives

The decline in population since the Great Famine had been accompanied by the conversion of previously cultivated land into large grazing ranches, so that in many areas most of the local population was still crowded on tiny, uneconomical holdings within sight of open, untilled fields.[8] At the very place in Westport where in 1879 Parnell once launched the Irish Land League, and in response to the near-famine of 1897–98,[9] O’Brien established a new organisation, the United Irish League (UIL) in January 1898 under the banner of ‘’The Land for the People’. The League had as its prime declared object the breaking up of the large grassland farmers, by compelling them to surrender their lands voluntarily to the Congested Districts Board, established by Balfour in 1891, for redistribution among the tenants of smaller agricultural holdings.[10] It was largely welcomed even among some of the clergy while the authorities on the other hand kept the new movement under close observation.[11] Actually, O’Brien put more life into the country in the first six months of the League than the Nationalist party had aroused in years,[12] after widespread agrarian agitation recommenced in 1898.

The clergy in the district around Westport and Newport, County Mayo promoted the League with considerable zeal, one parish priest called for a branch to hunt the grabbers and Scottish graziers out of the country . Elsewhere the clergy were in no hurry to sanction the League's agitation. Except for Archbishop McEvilly of Tuam, who expressed sympathy for the goals of its agitation.[13] By September 1899 the League had spread to the extent that all six Connacht bishops expressed approval of attempts "to create peasant proprietorship with enlarged holdings in the west of Ireland".[14] The Tuam provincial hierarchy's accommodation of the League up to 1900 reflected predominantly the genuine congruence of their social ideals with the stated aims of the movement.[15]

The League was equally and explicitly designed to reconcile the various parliamentary fragments by bringing them together in a new grass roots organisation around a programme of agrarian agitation, political reform, settlement of the Irish land question and pursuit of Irish Home Rule. William O'Brien was the prime mover, and the difficulty of the project can be gauged from the fact that the parliamentary leaders had very different opinions on the land question. Dillon regarded the unresolved land issue as an essential motor for the nationalist home rule movement. O'Brien championed the smallholders against the large graziers while Davitt, whose original idea had been state ownership and agrarian socialism, was not particularly enamoured by peasant proprietorship.[16]

Though O’Brien claimed that his organisation had no political objective, he became intrinsically aware that to further their cause the three split factions of the IPP needed to be re-united.[17] He strongly believed that only agitational politics combined with constitutional pressures, rather than physical force, were the best means of achieving its goals. It was O’Brien's and Davitt's hope that reunion could be forced on the party from the outside, by organising the country and transforming the Irish representation in Parliament through the election of "good men".[18] Dillon became ambivalent about the new association, believing that it would lead to confrontation with the government and endanger the alliance with the Liberals . This marked the first significant strain in the O'Brien-Dillon relationship.

Expansion

Image
The Irish People (29 February 1908), the official newspaper of the UIL

Organised by John O'Donnell MP as its general secretary the UIL performed extremely well and threatened the position of the divided Irish Parliamentary Party. As a consequence, it quickly gained popular support among tenant farmer, its branches sweeping over most of the country, dictating to the demoralised Irish party leaders the terms for reconstruction, not only of the party but the nationalist movement in Ireland. The UIL platform included commitments to such themes as language revival and industrial development. The movement was backed by O'Brien's new newspaper The Irish People (Sept. 1899 – Nov. 1903). In it he declared that the new League was the people's organisation and that the people, and not the politicians, should be its base. Its organisation included an elaborate representative structure linked to a National Directory. This threat to the divided factions of the IPP began a reunification among MPs, led from above, to counter the UIL threat growing up from below.[19]

The League immediately took up the issue of land redistribution, which the Irish Land League had campaigned on two decades earlier, but had been sidelined after the IPP split into the declining Irish National League and the Irish National Federation. The League's first electoral target was the county council elections under the new revolutionary Local Government (Ireland) Act 1898. The Act broke the power of the landlord ascendancy dominated "Grand Juries", for the first time passing absolute democratic control of local affairs into the hands of the people through elected Local County Councils. Next to full Home Rule a no more remarkable concession to popular rights and economic reconstruction.

The creation of the new councils had a significant effect on Ireland as it allowed local people to take decisions affecting themselves. The County and the sub-county District Councils created a political platform for proponents of Irish Home Rule, displacing Unionist influence in many areas. The enfranchisement of local electors allowed the development of a new political class, creating a significant body of experienced politicians who would enter national politics in Ireland in the 1920s, and increase the stability of the transitions to the parliaments of the Irish Free State.

The first local government elections under the Act were held in the spring of 1899 when the Leagues' candidates swept the field and Nationalist county and district councillors began to conduct the local administrative functions hitherto performed by landlord-dominated grand-juries.[3] In some areas such as county Cork, where long standing trade union and labour traditions existed, the electorate tended to adhere to representatives of their allegiances. The depth of support for labour was particularly displayed in Mid-Cork, no doubt due to the growth of another organisation, the Irish Land and Labour Association (ILLA), assiduously cultivated by D. D. Sheehan the then editor of the Skibbereen based newspaper, The Southern Star, who assured that UIL and ILLA branch reports were given weekly press coverage, crucial for the expansion and growth of the UIL in Cork.[20] The existence of these two organisations, the UIL centred on popular broad-nationalism, the ILLA based on ‘labour nationalism’ at first apparently corroborative of one another, would within a decade ultimately lead to self-destructive class-tensions, schisms and divisions.[21]

The UIL tactic at the time of setting the have-nots against the haves naturally appealed to the self-interest of the simpler peasants and was the main reason for the rapid spread of the movement.[7] By April 1900 the League's listing showed 462 branches, representing between 60,000 and 80,000 members in twenty five counties.[3] Within two years O’Brien's UIL was by far the largest organisation in the country, comprising 1150 branches and 84,355 members.[22]

Party re-united

Image
John Redmond MP, first leader of the United Irish League

Around 1900 O'Brien, an unbending social reformer and agrarian agitator, was the most influential and powerful figure within the nationalist movement, although not formally its leader. The period was marked by considerable political development in which Davitt had been of great help during the crucial years of the League's existence, but in February, worn out and ill, he left for abroad.[23] The settlement of the party leadership question now focused on the two most important men in Irish politics, O'Brien and Redmond. The initiative seemed to lie with O'Brien, yet Redmond had the prestige of being the Irish party leader. O'Brien was not in the true sense a politician, he possessed great popular gifts, but lacked that will to power which is the hallmark of the politician.[24]

The result of the rapid growth of his UIL as a national organisation in achieving unity through organised popular opinion, was to effect a quick defensive re-union of the discredited IPP factions on 6 February in London under the unanimously agreed leadership of John Redmond MP,[25] largely fearing O'Brien's return to the political field. The National League and the Irish National Federation, representing the two wings of the IPP, both merged with the UIL, which actually became accepted by the parliamentarians as the main support organisation of the parliamentary nationalists. The UIL resembled the old INL, however, in its organisers; many of them were old INL cadre whom O'Brien had recruited for a repeat performance, and it thrived in those areas where land-hungry men were particularly dominant.[26]

The League organisers worked furiously during the months following the reunion to spread the UIL organisation into the eastern and southern parts of the country, the sharp rise during 1900 probably reflected the absorption of old National League and National Federation branches, the new organisation possessing a dynamism which had long been lost by the older bodies.[27] The ill-feeling between the League and many clergymen transcended the political conflicts within the Irish party. The dominance of the Church in Irish rural life made almost inevitable a sense of frustration on the part of young men of ambition among the lower classes. A generation earlier such men had gravitated into pathetic secret protest movement. Now they found a place in the United Irish League.[28]

One crucial problem had yet to be faced – the question of who should be president of the League. O’Brien, now at the pinnacle of national popularity, had created the League primarily to promote land purchase through vigorous agitation. This had been crippled earlier by Parnell in the National League. To avoid this in the future he saw the only way was by retaining control of the UIL through individuals who were agrarian agitators. A National Convention of the League was called and held in Dublin on 19 and 20 June 1900. It registered the triumph of the League as the national organisation with elaborate rules and a constitution drawn up by O’Brien. Redmond was elected chairman.[29] He himself had no doubt as to the future action to be taken. Redmond intended to capture O’Brien's organisation and subordinate it to party Parliamentarian interests.[30] He assumed the role of president in December. Within two years he and Dillon were to tactically adjunct the UIL under the wing of the IPP, manoeuvring it out of O'Brien's control.

In the September general election. O'Brien swept back to Parliament again for his old Cork constituency as the only begetter of the League and as a senior member of the inner circle of party managers. He could feel proud of his achievement after the reunited party fought its first election on the program of the United Irish League.[31] The unity disturbed O'Brien however as it resulted in most of the ineffective party candidates being re-elected, preventing the UIL Directory from using its power in the pre-selection of candidates. The task facing the united Irish Party's new leader Redmond was now to create a unified political organisation, effectively grounded in the realities of Irish society.[28] By 1901 revolutionary nationalism was moribund, though it was, of course, to undergo a miraculous recovery.[32]

Renewed agitation

Throughout the early months of 1901 agitation was limited, merely thirty-five cases of boycotting reported, due to O’Brien's weak health and Davitt being in America for most of the year. Despite this the Nationalists felt the old sting of League meetings being outlawed, the traditional reaction of the Administration to the least sign of popular unrest.[33] In August 1901 the UIL reached nearly 100,000 members,[34] when its Directory issued a resolution calling for active agitation throughout Ireland. O'Brien now at the height of his prestige, dominated the UIL machine and in a vigorous speech on 15 September called for “a great national strike against ranching and grabbing” as its winter program. What he wanted was boycotting and the filling of Irish jails.[35] Dillon also made several fiery speeches against the government, and to tenants encouraging them to demand rent reduction and "for the purpose of driving every landlord out of the country".[36]

With the National Convention in January 1902 claiming 1230 branches,[37] the scene was thus set for a clash between a strong government, which was in no mood to allow an Irish land war to deflect it from its own constructive ideas, and a League pledged to attack landlordism, turning more and more to the traditional weapons of boycott and outrage. The attitude of the Dublin Castle administration hardened to such a degree that O'Brien moved a parliamentary amendment in January 1901 condemning a resort to the methods of Arthur Balfour. A steady stream of proclamations and arrests continued so that between 1901 and 1902 among others, thirteen Irish MPs were imprisoned under the Crimes Act and by the Spring of 1902 the counties of Cavan, Clare, Cork, Leitrim, Mayo, Roscommon, Sligo, Tipperary and Waterford were proclaimed to fall under the Act.[38]

The UIL agitation focused attention on the fact that many families lived on patches of land too small to provide a decent livelihood even without rent.[39] Agitation by tenant farmers continued to press for compulsory land purchase, but the four years of almost ceaseless activity that O’Brien put into the League had not brought the benefits for the tenants he had hoped for, apart from giving the Parliamentary party a new lease of life. Nevertheless, the Chief Secretary for Ireland Wyndham came to recognise the dire situation of the starved population of the west of Ireland. The existence of the United Irish League, the conversion of the Ulster Protestant tenant leader T. W. Russell to compulsory land purchase, O'Brien whipping up enthusiasm for his winter program of boycotting and agitation together with the cost of maintaining a huge police force to quell agrarian unrest, influenced Wyndham to recognise that the time had come to construct a Land Bill for Ireland.[40]

Achievement

Image
Timothy Harrington, MP for the League and tenant farmers' representative

Balfour gave Wyndham the go-ahead to prepare for a Land Purchase Bill early in 1902, which when introduced in spring turned out to be a half-hearted abortive Bill, its terms, as urged by O'Brien, rejected by the party, so that the measure was withdrawn.[41] There then arose one of the most striking and richly complex initiatives in the entire political history of modern Ireland.[42] In June a landlord of moderate views, Lindsay Talbot Crosbie, wrote to the press calling for an agreed settlement between representatives of the proprietor and tenant interests. On 3 September a similar letter was published by another Galway landlord, Captain John Shawe-Taylor setting out proposals for a landlord-tenant conference. They were important because they articulated the desires of a small but influential group of moderate landlords, who, encouraged by the Administration in Dublin Castle, heralded an era of landlord-tenant rapprochement in Ireland.[43] What saved Taylor's letter from being branded, as Crosbie's scheme was by O'Brien's Irish People, as “a stale and rotten red-herring across the path of the National movement” was its endorsement by the Chief Secretary Wyndham, who grasped the chance to salvage his Land Bill for reintroduction on terms agreed to in advance by both interested parties.[41]

When letters of approval by Redmond and O'Brien were published in response by the press at the end of September there was no turning back. It resulted in Wyndham calling for a Land Conference to strive for a settlement by mutual agreement between landlord and tenant. It was to be among four landlord delegates to be led by Lord Dunraven on the one hand and William O'Brien MP, John Redmond MP, Timothy Harrington MP and Ulster's T. W. Russell MP representing tenant farmers on the other hand. Thus after considerable internal deliberations on both sides, the eight delegates met in Dublin on 20 December 1902 in a conference publicly hailed by Redmond as "the most significant episode in the public life of Ireland for the last century". After only six sittings, the conference report as framed by O'Brien was published on 4 January 1903, making eighteen recommendations. The report was received favourably by people holding most shades of public opinion.[44]

After O'Brien and Redmond had met the head of the Civil Service in Dublin Castle, Sir Anthony MacDonnell, for informal talks on 6 February, the National Directory and the Parliamentary party gave approval to the Land Conference terms on 16 February. The bill to achieve social reconciliation in Ireland was finally introduced by Wyndham on 25 March 1903. The Irish Landowners' Convention which met in April acclaimed the bill as "by far the largest and most liberal measure ever offered to landlords and tenants by any Government in any country".[45] A League Convention on 16 April saw 3,000 Nationalist supporters applaud the bill and O'Brien's resolution which "pledged the Irish nation . . . . . to the vital principle of the policy of national reconciliation". He followed this by orchestrating the greatest and widest piece of social legislation Ireland had yet seen, the Land (Purchase) Act (1903) through Parliament. The Act provided generous bonus-subsidy terms to landowners on sale, the Irish Land Commission overseeing the new landowner's low interest annuities.[45] O'Brien saw his achievement as having guided the official nationalist movement into endorsement of a new policy of "conference plus business" and of having set in motion events of decisive importance in reversing the consequences of centuries of alien domination. In the period 1903 to 1909 over 200,000 peasants became owners of their holdings under the Act.[46] There is no reason to doubt O'Brien's sincerity in viewing the settlement of the land question as the first step in the attainment of Home Rule. Unfortunately few others would have the same outlook, for which he was yet to suffer.[47]

Estrangement

The passing of the Land Act in August 1903 precipitated a full-scale attack on O'Brien and the Act. The conciliatory approach and achievement in solving the land question aggravated Dillon who generally detested any negotiations with landlords. Together with Thomas Sexton and his Irish party's Freeman's Journal, Dillon denounced the legislation and the "doctrine of conciliation". This divergence, was in a few short weeks to turn the two old and once intimate friends into mortal enemies.[48] Davitt condemned both peasant land proprietorship and that land was being purchased rather than confiscated from the landlords. O'Brien requested from his conciliatory friend Redmond that they be disciplined, which to O'Brien's consternation he refused to do, fearing a renewed party split.

Seeing himself thus alienated from the party O'Brien informed Redmond on 4 November 1903 that he was resigning from Parliament, leaving the UIL Directory, ceasing publication of his newspaper, The Irish People and withdrawing from public life. Despite appeals from friends and allies he refused to reconsider.[49] O’Brien's resignation was a very serious matter for the party, throwing it into a state disarray not experienced since the Parnell crisis in 1890. It had repercussions at home and abroad. Laurence Ginnell of the central office reported 22 lapsed divisional bodies by December, 489 lapsed branches by the spring of 1904. The League was wholly dead in the west and in Dublin. Particularly younger men turned from any support whatever for the parliamentary movement. Davitt reported that it was also virtually dead in United States. The League continued to decline nationwide over the next years seriously affecting the funding of both the party and the League.[50]

At the November 1904 National Convention, the General Secretary of the League, O'Brien's loyal John O'Donnell MP, was replaced by Dillon's close protégé and Belfast ally Joseph Devlin a young MP of remarkable political ability[51] who in time gained complete control and leadership of the entire party organisation. It deprived O'Brien of all authority. Devlin was devoted to Dillon, who had helped him greatly in his rise to eminence, and Dillon in his turn had come to heavily rely on him, not only for control of the United Irish League and the Catholic organisation, the Ancient Order of Hibernians (AOH), but also because he was the outstanding representative of Ulster Nationalism.[52]

O'Brien had always been gravely disturbed by the Irish Parliamentary Party's involvement with "that sinister sectarian secret society", the Ancient Order of Hibernians, often known as the Molly Maguires, or the Mollies – what he called "the most damnable fact in the history of this country", and was bitterly resentful and unsparing in his attacks upon it.[53] AOH members represented Catholic-nationalism of a Ribbon tradition, their Ulster Protestant counterpart the Orange Order. Joseph Devlin, the AOH Grandmaster had attached himself to the Dillonite section of the Irish Party, was now additionally General Secretary of O'Brien's adopted UIL.[54] Devlin was already known as "the real Chief Secretary of Ireland",[55] his AOH spreading successfully and eventually saturating the entire island.[56] Even in Dublin the AOH could draw large crowds and stage impressive demonstrations. In 1907, Devlin was able to assure John Redmond, the Irish Party leader, that a planned meeting of the UIL would be well attended because he would be able to get more than 400 AOH delegates to fill the hall.[57]

Paths divide

From the founding of the UIL, O’Brien held the view that Ireland's problems were caused by the manoeuvrings of the parliamentary politicians who were out of touch with popular opinion. Under the new arrangements after 1900, O’Brien proclaimed that the party should be subordinated to the League, which represented the true feeling of the country. But what in fact happened was that party members soon dominated the councils of the League and its administrative machinery. Redmond never attempted to hide the necessity for the party to be dominant in policy-making. Once O’Brien began to campaign against party policy, he was treated as a “factionist”. In 1900 the leadership of the UIL had consisted of O’Brien and Dillon. In 1905, it consisted of Redmond, Dillon, and to a lesser extent, Joseph Devlin and T. P. O’Connor. O'Brien, by refusing to play the game according to the unwritten rules, forfeited his place in the leadership of the League.[58]

O'Brien subsequently became involved with the Irish Reform Association 1904–1905, then turned to and allied with D. D. Sheehan and his Irish Land and Labour Association, which became his new platform for renewed political activity. In addition O'Brien supported both the 1904 devolution scheme and the 1907 Irish Council Bill, a bill rejected by the UIL, as a step in the right direction, or "Home Rule by instalments". These involvements inflamed the Dillonite section of the IPP to the extent that they were determined to destroy both O'Brien and Sheehan "before they poison the whole country"[59] and published regular denunciations of their conciliatory policies in the IPP's Freeman's Journal. By 1907, there were seven MPs outside the parliamentary party. Proposals to reunite the party were made by Redmond and a meeting summoned for the Mansion House, Dublin, in April 1908.[60] In the interest of unity, O'Brien and others rejoined the party, though a year later O'Brien left it for good. This time he was hounded out by Devlin's Molly Maguire baton troops, a wing of the Hibernian Order, on the occasion of the rigged Dublin National Convention in February 1909, called the "Baton Convention", in a dispute over the financial arrangements for the next stage of the 1909 Land Purchase Act.[61] As a consequence, O'Brien next founded his new political movement, the All-for-Ireland League, which returned eight independent MPs in the December 1910 general elections.

The United Irish League remained politically active as Devlin's support organisation for the Parliamentary party, becoming largely infiltrated by members of the Ancient Order of Hibernians, up until the rise of Sinn Féin after the outbreak of World War I in 1914. From 1918, the UIL was restricted to Northern Ireland; it was defunct by the mid-1920s.[62]

Notes

1. O'Brien, Joseph V.: William O'Brien and the course of Irish Politics, 1881–1918, “"The United Irish League"” p.107, University of California Press (1976) ISBN 0-520-02886-4
2. Miller, David W.: Church, State and Nation in Ireland 1898–1921 pp.19–28, Gill & Macmillan (1973) ISBN 0-7171-0645-4
3. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.112
4. Miller, David: p.17
5. O’Brien, Joseph V.: p.105
6. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.106
7. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.107
8. Miller, David: p. 18
9. Maume, Patrick: The long Gestation, Irish Nationalist Life 1891–1918, p.30 , Gill & Macmillan (1999) ISBN 0-7171-2744-3
10. Maume, Patrick: p.31
11. O’Brien, Joseph V.: pp.107–8
12. O’Brien, Joseph V.: p.110
13. Miller, David: p.20
14. Miller, David: p.23
15. Miller, David: p.18
16. Garvin, Tom: The Evolution of Irish Nationalist Politics: The Reconstruction of Nationalist Politics, 1891–1910 p.102, Gill & Macmillan (2005) ISBN 0-7171-3967-0
17. O’Brien, Joseph V.: pp.108–9
18. O’Brien, Joseph V.: p.114
19. Maume, Patrick: p.31
20. O'Donovan, John: Class, Conflict, and the United Irish League in Cork, 1900–1903 in SAOTHAR 37 pp.19–29, Journal of the Irish Labour History Society pp.20–21, (2012) ISSN 0332-1169
21. O’Donovan, John: pp.26–27
22. Garvin, Tom: table p. 101
23. O'Brien, Joseph V.: pp.111&119
24. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.118
25. Lyons, F. S. L.: John Dillon, Ch. 7 pp.204–05, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1968), SBN 7100 2887 3
26. Garvin, Tom: p.103
27. Miller, David: p. 48
28. Miller, David: p.57
29. Lyons, F. S. L.: p.213
30. O’Brien, Joseph V.: p.125
31. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.127
32. Miller, David: p.60
33. O’Brien, Joseph V.: pp.129–130
34. Lyons, F. S. L.: p.223
35. O’Brien, Joseph V.: pp.130–31
36. Lyons, F. S. L.: p.225
37. O’Brien, Joseph V.: p.191
38. Lyons, F. S. L.: pp.224–5
39. Miller, David: p.76
40. O'Brien, Joseph V.: pp.138–39
41. O'Brien, J. V.: p.140
42. Jackson, Alvin: Home Rule: An Irish History 1800—2000 p.104, Phoenix Press (2003) ISBN 0-7538-1767-5
43. Jackson, Alwin: p.104
44. O'Brien, Joseph V.: pp.146–7
45. O'Brien, J. V.: pp.151–55
46. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.167
47. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.148
48. Lyons, F. S. L.: p.236
49. Maume, Patrick: p.69
50. O'Brien, Joseph V.: pp.161–63
51. Maume, Patrick: p.70
52. Lyons, F. S. L.: p.288
53. MacDonagh, Michael: The Life of William O'Brien, the Irish Nationalist, pp.181–2, Ernst Benn London (1928)
54. MacDonagh, Michael pp.181–2
55. MacDonagh, Michael: p.182
56. Garvin, Tom: The Rise of the Hibernians pp.105–110
57. Garvin, Tom: 105–110
58. Miller, David: pp.140–42
59. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.170
60. Sheehan, D. D., Ireland since Parnell, pp.199–206, Daniel O'Connor, London (1921)
61. O'Brien, Joseph V.: p.187
62. Garvin, Tom: pp.108–9

References

• O’Brien, Joseph V.: William O’Brien and the course of Irish Politics, 1881–1918, “The United Irish League” pp. 107–125, University of California Press (1976), ISBN 0-520-02886-4
• Miller, Dr. David W.: Church, State and Nation in Ireland 1898–1921 Gill & Macmillan (1973), ISBN 0-7171-0645-4
• Maume, Patrick: The Long Gestation- Irish Nationalist Life 1891–1918, Gill & Macmillan (1999), ISBN 0-7171-2744-3
• Garvin, Tom: The Evolution of Irish Nationalist Politics, (1991) Gill & Macmillan (2005), ISBN 0-7171-3967-0
• Barberis, Peter, McHugh, John and Tyldesley, Mike: Encyclopedia of British and Irish Political Organisations, Continuum Publishing London (2005)
• Stanford, Jane: That Irishman, the Life and Times of John O'Connor Power, 'United Irish League', pp. 195–201, The History Press Ireland (2011), ISBN 978-1-84588-698-1
• O’Donovan, John: Class, Conflict, and the United Irish League in Cork, 1900–1903, in SAOTHAR 37, pp. 19–29, Journal of the Irish Labour History Society (2012), ISSN 0332-1169

External links

• United-Irish-League-in-Cork-1900-1910
• United Ireland League campaigns
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:36 am

Berlin Committee
by Wikipedia
Accessed: 6/5/20

The Berlin Committee, later known as the Indian Independence Committee (German: Indisches Unabhängigkeitskomitee) after 1915, was an organisation formed in Germany in 1914 during World War I by Indian students and political activists residing in the country. The purpose of the Committee was to promote the cause of Indian Independence. Initially called the Berlin–Indian Committee, the organisation was renamed the Indian Independence Committee in 1915 and came to be an integral part of the Hindu–German Conspiracy. Famous members of the committee included Virendranath Chattopadhyaya (alias Chatto), Chempakaraman Pillai and Abinash Bhattacharya

Background

A number of Indians, notably Shyamji Krishna Varma, had formed the India House in England in 1905. This organisation, with the support of Indian luminaries like Dadabhai Naoroji, Lala Lajpat Rai, Madame Bhikaji Cama and others, offered scholarships to Indian students, promoted nationalistic work, and was a major platform for anti-colonial opinions and views. The Indian Sociologist, published by Krishna Varma, was a notable anti-colonial publication. Prominent Indian Nationalists associated with the India House included Vinayak Damodar Savarkar or Veer Savarkar, Virendranath Chattopadhyaya (alias Chatto), and Har Dayal.

The British government kept track of India House because of the nature of its work and the increasingly inciting tone of The Indian Sociologist, which proposed killing British colonial officials. English detectives followed and watched the student leaders in India House. The speed of Veer Savarkar's activities in London was breathtaking. India House was constantly in the news from 1906 to 1910. Savarkar started regular Sunday meetings to discuss various topics related to India's future. The speeches made during these meetings by Veer Savarkar were deemed seditionist. In 1909, Madan Lal Dhingra, closely associated with Veer Savarkar and the India House, shot and killed William Hutt Curzon Wyllie, the political ADC to the Secretary of State for India. In the aftermath of the assassination, India House was rapidly suppressed. Evidence found showed that Browning pistols were being sent to India in order to bring about an armed revolution. Veer Savarkar was arrested for all this and awarded Life Sentence. His famous arrest in London caused legal difficulties for British Courts and whose case is still referred to in the interpretations of the Fugitive Offenders Act and the Habeas Corpus (Rex Vs Governor of Brixton Prison, ex-parte Savarkar). Other leaders, including Krishna Varma, were forced to flee to Europe. Some, including Virendranath Chattopadhyaya, moved to Germany, while a number of the leadership moved to Paris.[1]

World War I

At the outbreak of World War I, Indian nationalists looked for ways to use the enmities to support their goals. As early as 1912, the German Foreign Office had considered supporting the Pan-Islamist and Bengali revolutionary movement in India to weaken the British position.[2]

The Kaiser had considered the option on 31 July 1914 when Russian mobilisation was confirmed, and the scope of British mobilisation against Germany was becoming evident.[2] In September 1914, the German Chancellor, Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, was authorised by the Kaiser to sanction German activity against British India.[2][3] The German effort was headed by Max von Oppenheim, an archaeologist and the head of the newly formed Intelligence Bureau for the east. He was to organize the Indian student groups into a cohesive group. Oppenheim also convinced Har Dayal of the feasibility of the project.

A group of Indians resident in Germany, headed by M. Prabhakar (then teaching at Düsseldorf after graduating from Heidelberg), along with Abd ur Rahman and A Siddiqui, had issued statements condemning England and France for their support of the Czar in Russia. As these students were political novices, Oppenheim sought to find more prominent revolutionaries who would carry more weight in the community. Otto Gunther von Wesendonck, a young officer of the Auswärtiges Amt, was given the task of organising revolutionary outbreaks along the Indian and Russian border.[4] with the help of their close acquaintance Anna Maria Simon, Abhinash Bhattacharya and Virendranath Chattopadhyaya issued similar statements against Britain and France, which were distributed in Austria-Hungary, Switzerland and the Netherlands in addition to Germany, attracting editorial comments. The duo, with the help of Frau Simon, set up meetings with the Berlin Foreign office.[1]

Berlin Committee

Arriving at Berlin, they were assigned a building in the Schöneberg suburbs, as their new headquarters. In their first meeting with the foreign office liaison Max von Oppenheim, on 3 September 1915, Chattopadhyay (also known as Chatto) identified the goals and requirements of the committee:[1]

• With a view to starting a revolution in India,
o Money, arms ammunition as well as expert advice were needed.
o They should be carried to the Indian coast.
o Early arrangement should be made to send the leaders back to India.
• A large number of 10 Rupee notes were to be forged and sent to India to create some confusion in their money market.
• An Indo-German Committee should be constituted to co-ordinate and carry on these activities.

With the help of Oppenheim, messages were sent out to Indian students in German universities, as well as Switzerland, Austria and the Netherlands, who were likely to share the same views. Among those who joined the organisation at the time were Dr. Dhiren Sarkar, Chanji Kersasp, N. S. Marathe, Dr. J. N. Dasgupta, and C. Padmanabhan Pillai, quickly joined by his brother, Champak Raman Pillai. The 'Champak-Chatto' Berlin Committee was founded.[1]

Although the group urged him, Oppenheim refused to approach Shyamji Krishnavarma, then in Geneva, nor did he try to reach Lala Lajpat Rai, then in the United States. The latter was suspected by British intelligence in the United States to be deeply involved in the seditionist movement [5] although he personally refused to enter an alliance with another Imperialist Power.[4] In 1915, Har Dayal and Barkatullah became actively involved in the Berlin Committee and its goals. The committee is known to have sent missions to the Middle Eastern cities of Istanbul and Baghdad, and Kabul, Afghanistan.[6]

Hindu–German Conspiracy

Main article: Hindu–German Conspiracy

The committee soon established contacts with Indian revolutionaries, including Bagha Jatin. They visited armament and explosives factories to identify war material, and met with Indian prisoners-of-war held in Germany to recruit them to the nationalist cause. Lala Har Dayal, who had fled to Germany after his arrest in the United States, was convinced to lend his support to the committee's cause. They established contacts with the Ghadarite movement in the United States. Dr. Dhiren Sarkar and N.S. Marathe left for Washington, D.C. on 22 September 1915 and, through the German Ambassador, Johann von Bernstoff, established links with the Ghadar Party. The culmination of the American efforts was the Annie Larsen arms plot.

Kabul mission

Main article: Provisional Government of India

See also: Oskar von Niedermayer and Niedermayer–Hentig Expedition

The Berlin-Indian Committee (which became the Indian Independence Committee after 1915) created an Indo-German-Turkish mission to the Indo-Iranian border to encourage the tribes to strike against British interests.[7] At this time, the Berlin Committee was in touch with the Khairi brothers (Abdul Jabbar Khairi and Abdul Sattar Khairi) who had settled in Istanbul at the onset of the World War I. In 1917 they had proposed to the Kaiser a plan to lead tribes in Kashmir and North-West Frontier Province against British interests. Another group, led by the Deobandi Maulana Ubaid Allah Sindhi and Mahmud al-Hasan (principle of the Darul Uloom Deoband), had traveled to Kabul in October 1915 with plans to initiate a Muslim insurrection in the tribal belt of India. Ubaid Allah proposed that the Amir of Afghanistan should declare war against Britain while Mahmud al Hasan sought German and Turkish help. Hasan proceeded to Hijaz. Ubaid Allah, in the meantime, established friendly relations with the Amir.

At Kabul, Ubaid Allah, along with some students who had preceded him to Ottoman Turkey to join the Caliph's "Jihad" against Britain, decided that the pan-Islamic cause would be better served by focusing on the Indian Freedom Movement.[8] This group was met by the Indo-German-Turkish mission to Kabul in December 1915, headed by Oskar von Niedermayer and including among its members Werner Otto von Hentig, the German diplomatic representative to Kabul; and Raja Mahendra Pratap, Barkatullah and other prominent nationalists from the Berlin group. Known as the Niedermayer–Hentig mission, it brought members of the Indian movement to India's border, and carried messages from the Kaiser, Enver Pasha, and Abbas Hilmi, the displaced Khedive of Egypt, expressing support for Pratap's mission. They asked the Amir to move against India.[9][10] The mission's immediate goal was to rally the Amir against British India[9] and to obtain a right of free passage for the conspirators from the Afghan Government.[11]

Although the Amir made no commitment to the group, they found support amongst the Amir's immediate and close political and religious advisory group, including his brother Nasrullah Khan, his sons Inayatullah Khan and Amānullāh Khān, and religious leaders and tribesmen.[9] Afghanistan's then most influential newspaper, the Siraj al-Akhbar, took Barkatullah as an officiating editor in early 1916. Its editor Mahmud Tarzi published a number of inflammatory articles by Raja Mahendra Pratap, as well as increasingly anti-British and pro-Central Powers articles and propaganda. By May 1916, the tone in the paper was deemed serious enough for the British Raj to intercept its issues.[9] In 1916, the Berlin Committee established the Provisional Government of India in Kabul.

Its formation infers the seriousness of intention and purpose of the revolutionaries. The government had Raja Mahendra Pratap as President, Barkatullah as Prime Minister, Ubaid al Sindhi as the Minister for India, Maulavi Bashir as War Minister and Champakaran Pillai as Foreign Minister. It tried to gain support from the Russian Empire, Republican China, and Japan. Galib Pasha joined them in proclaiming jihad against Britain.[11]

Following the February Revolution in Russia in 1917, Pratap's Government is known to have corresponded with the nascent Soviet Government. In 1918, Pratap met the Russian leader Leon Trotsky in Petrograd before meeting the Kaiser in Berlin; he urged both to mobillise against British India.[12] Under pressure from the British, the Afghans withdrew their cooperation and the mission closed down. The Niedermayer–Hentig Expedition, with associated liaisons of the German mission had a profound effect on the political and social situation in Afghanistan. It catalyzed political change that ended with the assassination of Habibullah in 1919 and the transfer of power to Nasrullah and, subsequently, Amānullah; the Third Anglo-Afghan War began, which led to Afghan Independence.[12]

End of the Indian Independence Committee

The Committee was formally disbanded in November 1918, with most of the members shifting their attention to the nascent Soviet Russia. Between 1917 and 1920, most of the members became active in communism.

Notes

1. "Champak-Chatto" And the Berlin Committee". Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. Retrieved 4 November 2007.
2. Fraser 1977, p. 256
3. Hoover 1985, p. 251
4. Fraser 1977, p. 257
5. Dignan 1971
6. Bagulia 2006, p. 146
7. Ansari 1986, p. 514
8. Ansari 1986, p. 515
9. Sims-Williams 1980, p. 120
10. Seidt 2001, p. 1,3
11. Ansari 1986, p. 516
12. Hughes 2002, p. 474

References

• Newsletter of the Regional Office-South East Asia. German Academic Exchange Service.
• "Champak-Chatto And the Berlin Committee".Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
• Hoover, Karl. (1985), The Hindu Conspiracy in California, 1913-1918. German Studies Review, Vol. 8, No. 2. (May, 1985), pp. 245-261, German Studies Association, ISSN 0149-7952.
• Fraser, Thomas G (1977), Germany and Indian Revolution, 1914-18. Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Apr., 1977), pp. 255-272., Sage Publications, ISSN 0022-0094.
• Ansari, K.H. (1986), Pan-Islam and the Making of the Early Indian Muslim Socialist. Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3. (1986), pp. 509-537, Cambridge University Press.
• Sims-Williams, Ursula (1980), The Afghan Newspaper Siraj al-Akhbar. Bulletin (British Society for Middle Eastern Studies), Vol. 7, No. 2. (1980), pp. 118-122, London, Taylor & Francis Ltd, ISSN 0305-6139.
• Hughes, Thomas L (2002), The German Mission to Afghanistan, 1915-1916.German Studies Review, Vol. 25, No. 3. (Oct., 2002), pp. 447-476., German Studies Association, ISSN 0149-7952.
• Seidt, Hans-Ulrich (2001), From Palestine to the Caucasus-Oskar Niedermayer and Germany's Middle Eastern Strategy in 1918.German Studies Review, Vol. 24, No. 1. (Feb., 2001), pp. 1-18, German Studies Association, ISSN 0149-7952.

External Links

• Liebau, Heike: Berlin Indian Independence Committee, in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Sat Jun 06, 2020 2:31 am

Chapter 23. Politicians versus Saints
Excerpt from "All You Need is Love: An Eyewitness Account of When Spirituality Spread from the East to the West"
by Nancy Cooke de Herrera
Foreword by Deepak Chopra

Chapter 23. Politicians versus Saints

The late '60s and early '70s were good years for me and my family, with the exception of Tony's sickness. Although he had been off cortisone since 1969, the rigidity of his frame entered his personality. I continually cautioned the children to overlook his crankiness as he became more limited with his body movements.

Even though Tony and I now lived like brother and sister, we were a good team. I threw my energies into my family, the SRM [Spiritual Regeneration Movement], traveling, and entertaining for Tony. His energy went into music and the law. I continued with my lecture series and also was a judge for the Miss California beauty contest each year.

Image
Nancy as Ambassadress of Fashion (Swedish Life Magazine, 1957)

Image
Staebe-Seger's farewell party for me, with the "West Berlin Couturiers" (Berlin, 1958).

Image
The Ambassadress of Fashion with the Princess Marcella Borghese (Rome, 1958)

Occasionally, we took a month's vacation to Honolulu or some place where Tony could swim. He always returned vastly improved, but then he would return to his workaholic ways. Several doctors commented that his mind was killing his body, but Tony would not listen. He took in more partners, and the money rolled in. He didn't consider the personal cost to him and to his family life.

Maharishi taught, "You judge the effectiveness of your meditation by how your life flows." Life was flowing for us financially, if not in health. My children had come through the frantic '60s drug-free, happy, well-balanced young people with a sense of direction and joy in life. The boys missed Vietnam by flunking their health exams-two had extra vertebrae and one a heart murmur. Rik had graduated from UCLA and gone off to architecture school in Oregon; Starr was finishing Stanford; Brett still attended Yale; and Maria Luisa was happily at Westlake. I had so much to be grateful and thankful for. The only negative we had was Tony's delicate state of health.

I did a lot of traveling with the children. Brett, Maria Luisa, and I visited Spain, Italy, and Greece; Tony joined us in London. Another trip with Brett and Maria Luisa was to Berlin, where I was still working with German couture. With Brett's ability to pick up languages, he was a joy to travel with.

But no country pulled me back like India. I returned regularly to work on different secular projects -- I helped design fashions that would be attractive to Western buyers and I originated itineraries for India's Minister of Tourism. The Indian travel industry had no idea of how to present their incredible country. In 1969, under the supervision of S.K. Roy, still the Director General of Tourism, I brought 20 friends to India and gave them a 30-day "fairyland" tour. My Indian friends entertained us; we stayed in Maharajahs' palaces; we went from the untouched beaches of Trivandrum to the high peaks of Nepal. They all came back confirmed Indiaphiles.

Because of the success of my Indian trip, the airline gave me three free round-the-world passes.
So, in 1970, Tony, Starr, and I went to Rishikesh together. Brett and Maria Luisa were in school, so they could not join us. The ashram had a new image. In order to accommodate the increasing numbers attending courses, the blocks had been closed in, and the porches made into rooms. Unfortunately, it was not well done. We were given The Beatles' old block. What luxury in comparison to what I'd experienced in '68. Now there was a new ashram kitchen and dining room complex -- very nicely done, except it leaked in the rain. I was so happy to have Tony along and prayed he would enjoy the trip.

At the end of two weeks of resting and meditating, Tony looked like a different person; his aches and pains were gone. I began to hope I might get my "real husband" back, but once back in the highly competitive world of law and business, the advances soon disappeared.

It was the last time I saw Maharishi at the ashram; he was now giving most of his courses in Europe. Because of tax problems with the Indian government, he did not return to India for many years. I frequently told my Indian friends, "You have driven away your best export. You should attract Maharishi back to India. Think of the money India is losing. The thousands attending Maharishi's course would have, and should have, come here." I guess they felt TM was a flash in the pan.

Throughout this period India continued to intrigue me. No other country offers such a range of contrasts. It is a mosaic of not only people, but of traditions, climates, cultures, and scenery.

Each time I went to India I returned to the ashram to see Satyanand. In spite of letters and phone calls advising of my arrival, the result was always the same. I would climb the hill, be greeted by peons, and nothing was ready for me. Everything was uncared for. New buildings had gone up instead of taking care of what was there. It had gone "Indian" in spite of Satyanand's supervision.

Several times returning home from India I called on Maharishi, who usually was in Italy, Spain, or Switzerland. I begged him to send a European couple to take over management of the ashram, but it fell on deaf ears.
His courses grew in number and the organization became prosperous in spite of the press, who continued to print any scandalous rumor about Maharishi that came their way -- no thought was given to authenticity.

[Mia Farrow] accused Maharishi Mahesh Yogi of hitting on her when she visited the guru with The Beatles in 1968.

The Fab Four flew home from India in disgust after Mia fled the Maharishi’s cave in tears claiming the supposedly celibate swami had grabbed and groped her.

“Boys! Boys! What’s wrong? Why are you leaving?” the Maharishi shouted after them, John Lennon later recalled.

“If you’re so f - - king cosmic, you’ll know,” came Lennon’s scathing reply.

Lennon expressed his disillusionment in “Sexy Sadie” — originally titled “Maharishi” but changed to avoid legal problems — singing, “Sexy Sadie, what have you done? You made a fool of everyone.”


-- Mia Farrow claimed Beatles pal groped her, by Richard Johnson


One who did come to Maharishi's defense often was the world famous nutritionist, Dr. Gayelord Hauser. This vigorous, young 70-yearold had sold over 70 million books and was responsible for bringing yogurt to the Western world. During the fifties when I first met him in Paris, he had his followers on the blackstrap molasses, wheat germ, and yogurt kick. He had a huge following around the globe, but lived most of the year in Beverly Hills; we had become intimate friends.

He once said to me regarding lecturing, "Honey, just remember five little words, 'What's in it for me' -- that's what an audience wants to hear." His 6'3" physique was trim and tan, no fat on him. His thick, gray hair crowned a large head that was always held erect. His blue eyes were surrounded with laugh lines.

"That little guy," he said, referring to Maharishi, "really has something. People in Germany (Gayelord's place of birth) were prepared to laugh at him, instead they started to follow him."

He paused and said in a soothing voice, "Girls and boys," as he loved to address his audience, "he knows that tension is one of the worst sicknesses of America. If you meditate, tension leaves you."


Side Effects of Meditation With Possible Adverse Reactions

Depersonalization, Derealization...Hallucinations, Fear of persecution, Disorientation, Poor insight and judgment, Reduced food intake...Insomnia reported as complete sleep loss...Delusions of grandeur, Thought disorder...Feelings of anxiety, Feelings of intense dysphoria, Feelings of mania...Increased epileptogenisis susceptibility...Double vision, Grandiosity/elation...Feelings of depression, including Attempted suicide...Restlessness/extreme agitation...Reports of psychosis...Decreased life motivation/boredom, Increased negativity/self-judgment...Panic and/or tension...Disorientation/confusion, Feelings of meditation “addiction”, Reports of pain ...Religious delusions...Intense fear and loneliness...Feelings of mania, including Increased talkativeness, Overactivity/restlessness, Distractible, Sexual disinhibition, Reports of psychotic symptoms, including Thought disorder with flight of ideas.

-- Mindfulness Meditation Research: Issues of Participant Screening, Safety Procedures, and Researcher Training, by M. Kathleen B. Lustyk, PhD; Neharika Chawla, MS; Roger S. Nolan, MA; G. Alan Marlatt, PhD


Image
At seventy-five, a young Dr. Gayelord Hauser. He died in 1985 at age ninety.

Once, during one of his lectures, he introduced me to the 3,000 staring faces, "This is my friend Nancy. She introduced me to Maharishi and then taught me meditation, one of the great gifts in my life." A nice plug from a world figure.

Slowly I reconciled myself to the fact that my marriage situation was not going to change or get much better. I rationalized, "I have a happy secure base for myself and the children; I've already had more romance in my life than most people; socially I belong to the best organizations and groups in the Beverly Hills/Los Angeles area-any outsider would think I lead a very glamorous life. I think so too, so what do I have to complain about?" If I were going to have a love affair, it would be with travel.

My friend Carroll Righter, the astrologer, had advised me when I'd told him of my plans to marry Tony, "Well, take lots of trips. Cancer and Aries are not a good combination -- water and fire getting together produce steam -- you'll need an escape valve for sure."

Image

Carroll Righter (February 2, 1900 – April 30, 1988) was known as the "astrologer to the stars." He wrote a syndicated daily advice column for 166 newspapers around the world and was reputed to be an advisor to Ronald and Nancy Reagan. Righter, who liked to be called the "gregarious Aquarius,' began doing charts for Hollywood notables in 1938 and became a columnist in 1950. Prior to that, he was a lawyer in Philadelphia.

Righter was mentioned in President Reagan's 1965 autobiography Where's The Rest of Me? and, according to former White House Chief of Staff Donald T. Regan, Mrs. Reagan turned to astrologers to help determine the president's schedule. Asked specifically whether he believed in astrology, President Reagan said, "I don't guide my life by it" but he added, "I don't know enough about it to say, is there something to it or not...and I don't mean to offend anyone who does believe in it, or engages in it." When Righter was asked in 1985 if he consulted with Ronald Reagan on astrology, he replied, "No comment."

Righter claimed he warned Marlene Dietrich to avoid working on a studio set one day because she might get hurt. His advice was not heeded, and Dietrich broke an ankle while reaching out to save a falling child. Word of the accident and Righter's advice led other celebrities to the astrologer, ensuring his fame. Among those who sought his advice were Arlene Dahl, Rhonda Fleming, Jane Withers, Hildegard Knef, Joan Fontaine and Grace Kelly. At one point in the late 1930s, the then-young Robert Mitchum worked as a ghost writer for Righter.

Righter wrote several books, including Astrology and You, the Astrological Guide to Health and Diet, and the Astrological Guide to Marriage and Family Relations.

-- Carroll Righter, by Wikipedia


He was right; my trips were this valve. Tony encouraged our trips; he liked the quiet times when we were away. The house was well run, and he could have his beloved Bach blaring at ear-bursting levels.

My mother once asked, "How can you stand that continual loud sound all the time when Tony is home? It would drive me mad." Houseguests often complained and asked that the music be turned down. Sir John BarbiroIIi, the well-known conductor, once provided ammunition when he said, "Tony, turn that music down! Music is to be listened to, not shouted over." Tony was Sir John's lawyer so he had to respond.

My solution was to wear earplugs, or I'd go into my bedroom and shut the door in order to concentrate on whatever I was doing. It seemed a sensible solution, now that our marriage had assumed the platonic level Dr. Bieler had predicted.

That Tony enjoyed having the house to himself was confirmed, when, against everyone else's advice, he encouraged me to go to India, just weeks after the Pak-Indian war came to an end in 1972.

"Go and present the U.S. side to our Indian friends." He loaded me down with all sorts of information and data and practically pushed me out the door.


It wasn't a happy trip. None of the children could go with me, so this time I went alone. Once back in India, I did nothing for six weeks but argue that President Nixon had tried not to take sides in the war. Originally, Pakistan and India had been offered the same armaments deal. The former accepted, while the latter haughtily turned it down. U.S. columnists Leon Frankel and Jack Anderson, with their violently anti-Nixon views, had done much to erode friendship between India and the U.S. As the only U.S. journalists heard from in Indian newspapers, India judged the U.S. attitude by their writings.

My friend Piloo Mody tried to explain these attacks. "The Indians, having won what on a world scale was a small military battle, are now plumped up like proud pigeons. Don't let them get to you, Nancy."

Then my Parsee friend added, "And don't forget, Nancy, arrogance comes easily to an Indian."


Image

Piloo Mody (14 November 1926 – 29 January 1983) was an Indian architect and politician and one of the founding members of the Swatantra Party....

The Swatantra Party was an Indian classical liberal political party, that existed from 1959 to 1974. It was founded by C. Rajagopalachari in reaction to what he felt was the Jawaharlal Nehru-dominated Indian National Congress's increasingly socialist and statist outlook.

It had a number of distinguished leaders, most of them old Congressmen, for example, C. Rajagopalachari, Tanguturi Prakasam Pantulu, Minoo Masani, N.G. Ranga, Darshan Singh Pheruman, Udham Singh Nagoke and K.M. Munshi. Right-wing groups and parties had existed earlier at the local and regional levels, but Swatantra’s formation was the first attempt to bring these highly fragmented right-wing forces together under the umbrella of a single party. The provocation was the left turn which the Congress took at Avadi[11] and the Nagpur Resolutions. Swatantra stood for a market-based economy with the "Licence Raj" dismantled, although it opposed laissez faire policies. The party was thus favoured by some traders and industrialists, but at the state-level, its leadership was dominated by the traditional privileged classes such as zamindars (feudal landlords) and erstwhile princes. Located on the right of the Indian political spectrum Swatantra was not a communal party; its membership was not restricted on the basis of religion, unlike the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Jana Sangh. In 1960, Rajagopalachari and his colleagues drafted a 21-point manifesto detailing why Swatantra had to be formed, even though they were hitherto Congressmen and associates of Nehru during the struggle for independence. The Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was highly critical of Swatantra, dubbing the party as belonging to "the middle ages of lords, castles and zamindars".

-- Swatantra Party, by Wikipedia


In 1975, at the time of the Emergency in India, Mody was arrested on the orders of the Indira Gandhi government, using the controversial powers granted by the Maintenance of Internal Security Act.

After an absence of a year from parliament, on 10 April 1978 Mody joined the Rajya Sabha and served there until his death in 1983.

-- Piloo Mody, by Wikipedia


But, eventually, it did get to me. I couldn't understand why all of India seemed so anti-U.S. We did have a record of trying to help them over the years with a massive educational and agricultural aid program. Was this all forgotten, or was it just an illustration of this story:

"One day, Confucius, walking with a friend, nodded in recognition to a man coming toward him. The other man defiantly ignored his acknowledgment. Confucius turned to his companion, 'What strange behavior; I don't remember having ever helped him.'''


However, one evening, while dining with Goodie and Bikki Oberoi in their penthouse suite at the Oberoi Intercontinental,...

Image
Goodie Oberoi


an energetic, hawk-nosed, mustachioed man strode into the room, carrying a plastic bag full of greens.

"Here, enjoy this lettuce. It was raised in my garden, and I can guarantee no bloke has ever peed on it." He was introduced to me as Uncle Sam, my escort for the evening. He had a forceful, outgoing personality. When he heard I was on my way to Israel, he asked me to get some information on solar heating and water collection methods. I agreed and asked his full name and address.

Goodie laughed, "Ail you have to put on the envelope is Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw, India. He's the general who won our war."

Image

Field Marshal Sam Hormusji Framji Jamshedji Manekshaw, MC (3 April 1914 – 27 June 2008), widely known as Sam Manekshaw and Sam Bahadur ("Sam the Brave"), was the Chief of the Army Staff of the Indian Army during the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, and the first Indian Army officer to be promoted to the rank of field marshal. His military career spanned four decades and five wars, beginning with service in the British Indian Army in World War II....

Having already commanded troops at division, corps and regional levels, Manekshaw became the seventh chief of the army staff in 1969. Under his command, Indian forces conducted victorious campaigns against Pakistan in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, which led to the creation of Bangladesh in December 1971. He was awarded the Padma Vibhushan and the Padma Bhushan, the second and third highest civilian awards of India. In January 1973, Manekshaw was conferred with the rank of Field Marshal, the first army officer of independent India to be so honoured.

-- Sam Manekshaw, by Wikipedia


He had attended Sandhurst with the Pakistani President, General Yaya Khan and had psyched him out on every tactic, knowing exactly how the general's mind worked. At one moment, when Sam had Delhi practically surrounded by tanks, an anti-Gandhi sympathizer reportedly asked him, "Why don't you just take India." Sam replied, "Who wants it?"

He was presently the only Indian Field Marshall. How different his attitude was. He spoke with warmth and admiration for the U.S. and excused the Indians' excessive pride over their "little skirmish." He even spoke well of Ali Bhutto who, becoming Prime Minister of Pakistan, had the job of soothing the wounded national pride of his countrymen over the loss of Bangladesh -- a loss that Bhutto later confessed to me had probably been a blessing.
This was during a trip I made to Pakistan in '74.

Image

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (Sindhi: ذوالفقار علي ڀٽو‎; Urdu: ذوالفقار علی بھٹو‎‎; 5 January 1928 – 4 April 1979) was a Pakistani barrister and politician who served as the 9th Prime Minister of Pakistan from 1973 to 1977, and prior to that as the fourth President of Pakistan from 1971 to 1973. He was also the founder of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) and served as its chairman until his execution in 1979.

Born in modern-day Sindh and educated at the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Oxford, Bhutto trained as a barrister at Lincoln's Inn, before entering politics as one of President Iskander Mirza's cabinet members, and was assigned several ministries during President Ayub Khan's military rule from 1958. Appointed Foreign Minister in 1963, Bhutto was a proponent of Operation Gibraltar in Kashmir, leading to war with India in 1965. After the Tashkent Agreement ended hostilities, Bhutto fell out with Ayub Khan and was sacked from government.

Bhutto founded the PPP in 1967 on a socialist platform, and contested general elections held by President Yahya Khan in 1970. While the Awami League won a majority of seats overall, the PPP won a majority of seats in West Pakistan; the two parties were unable to agree on a new constitution in particular on the issue of Six Point Movement which many in West Pakistan saw as a way to break up the country. Subsequent uprisings led to the secession of Bangladesh, and Pakistan losing the war against Bangladesh-allied India in 1971. Bhutto was handed over the presidency in December 1971 and emergency rule was imposed. When Bhutto set about rebuilding Pakistan, he stated his intention was to "rebuild confidence and rebuild hope for the future".

By July 1972, Bhutto recovered 43,600 prisoners of war and 5,000 sq mi of Indian-held territory after signing the Simla Agreement. He strengthened ties with China and Saudi Arabia, recognised Bangladesh, and hosted the second Organisation of the Islamic Conference in Lahore in 1974. Domestically, Bhutto's reign saw parliament unanimously approve a new constitution in 1973, upon which he appointed Fazal Ilahi Chaudhry President and switched to the newly empowered office of Prime Minister. He also played an integral role in initiating the country's nuclear programme. However, Bhutto's nationalisation of much of Pakistan's fledgling industries, healthcare, and educational institutions led to economic stagnation. After dissolving provincial feudal governments in Balochistan was met with unrest, Bhutto also ordered an army operation in the province in 1973, causing thousands of civilian casualties.

Despite civil disorder, the PPP won parliamentary elections in 1977 by a wide margin. However, the opposition alleged widespread vote rigging, and violence escalated across the country. On 5 July that same year, Bhutto was deposed in a military coup by his appointed army chief Zia-ul-Haq, before being controversially tried and executed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 1979 for authorising the murder of a political opponent.

-- Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, by Wikipedia


Finally, getting fed up with politics in the capital city of India, I decided to travel south to check out some new potential tourist attractions and several holy men I'd been hearing about. In Madras, I had a delightful spiritual encounter. I sought out the Shankaracharya of that area. It reminded me of the quests Tom and I had made together.

Though advised that I'd never find him, and even if I did, he wouldn't see me, I took a young Indian guide, Vigi, and we set out in an Indian-made Ambassador. Having no air conditioner, we had to leave the windows open, so we arrived at the marketplace of ancient Kanchipuram hot and covered with dust.

Crumbling sandstone temples surrounded a square filled with exotic colors, pungent smells and people hawking their wares. Southern Indians seem smaller and darker than Northern Indians, and in Madras they speak Tamil, not Hindi. Most of the young women had woven fragrant flowers in their hair. We bought bright orange flower garlands mixed with sweet narcissus, and asked for news of the aged sage whose only mode of travel was walking. If he were nearby, the people would know it, as he was one of the most revered saints in India.

"Yes, he is here. He arrived yesterday." So the tip we'd been given was correct. A skinny arm pointed the direction.

The Swami's place of refuge was a small building with a thatched roof. In front was a water well. A group of people stood waiting. A white-robed Indian explained to Vigi in Tamil, "Tell Memsahib Swami does not see Europeans."

I persisted, "Please explain to the Shankaracharya that I am a follower of Maharishi's and the wisdom of Shankara. I do my puja every day and I have come to receive his darshan."

He disappeared, then came back to say, "It is all right, Memsahib, please stand behind these people."

I felt so happy as we waited for the Swami to appear. I studied the group in front. All were men, and by the sacred threads around their shoulders, they were of the Brahmin caste. Many times I had seen Maharishi give deference to a Brahmin over another of a lesser caste.

A hush fell over the group as a white-haired old man slowly emerged and stood at the other side of the well. His skin was dry and parched from years of walking in the relentless sun of Southern India. His hand grasped a staff. He looked at us with pale eyes and said nothing. His aide motioned to the first Brahmin. He prostrated himself on the ground and, rolling back and forth, wailed out his story.

"He has a very sick wife," Vigi explained.

Each came forward and repeated a similar tale. He hardly acknowledged them.

Then my turn came. Vigi told me it was not expected for me to roll on the ground. I went toward the well and gave my flowers to the aide. Vigi explained who I was and what was in my heart as I spoke my words in English. The old Swami beckoned me closer to the well. He peered at me closely with seemingly blind eyes. Then his parched face cracked with a slight smile, which revealed toothless gums. He moved forward and put the Brahmin's garlands around our necks. Then he turned and slowly left us. A tremendous surge of love filled my being.

Vigi and I wordlessly got back into our taxi. Months later, he wrote, "I had not been to the temple for a long time, and my family was upset with me. Now I go regularly and am studying our scriptures. My family is happy and joyous over the change that has taken place in me since I had the good karma to go with you to Kanchipuram."

Before leaving Kanchipuram, I bought an exquisite sari -- one typical of that place, so I would always have a material reminder of that experience with the old Shankaracharya. Experiences such as these were the jewels I gathered in India.

My love affair with India continued. Friends, who consider me an expert on the "subcontinent," frequently ask to "tag along" on my next trip. So, several times I took a group of friends to India; Rik went as my assistant. With one year of architectural school behind him, Rik became convinced that photography would be his profession, and architecture his hobby. These trips provided a good opportunity for selling photos to magazines.

Image
Ambassador and Mrs. Shankar Bajpai (Beijing, China, 1980)

In 1970, Shankar Bajpai wrote, suggesting we visit him in Gangtok, Sikkim. He had been the Indian Consul General in San Francisco in the '60s, and we'd met through B.K. Nehru. Now he was the Political Officer of Sikkim, which meant he ran the place, as India provided the small mountain country with its foreign policy, currency, and military presence. (Later, India swallowed it up as it did Goa, all the time criticizing the U.S. for expansionist policies in Vietnam.) His letter was provocative, "Two hours from Gangtok there is an exotic monastery in Rumtek. The top boy is a very important Tibetan Lama. Rik will get dramatic pictures and you can have the thrill of knowing another saint."

He loved to kid me about my holy friends.

We decided to do it and put a group of friends together. Taking people to India was turning out to be a new hobby for me. Shankar and his wife, Meera, were delighted. He wrote again, "Before you leave Darjeeling, call me. It's always a frightful bore at the border. Just to be on the safe side, I'll have my men waiting for you. And by the way, do you suppose you could bring me about 12 pounds of fresh pork? If so, we'll have an authentic Tibetan dinner for you."

He went on to name a few other items impossible to get in the tiny kingdom.

Image
K Shankar Bajpai (l), Indian ambassador to Pakistan in New Delhi on July 20, 1976.


Librarian of Congress James H. Billington has named K. Shankar Bajpai—who served as India’s ambassador to Pakistan, China and the United States—as Distinguished Visiting Scholar at the Library’s John W. Kluge Center.

At the Library, Bajpai hopes to explore the roots and history of Indo-American relations, and to examine more closely the question of post-colonial attitudes towards the colonial experience. Bajpai’s appointment started in mid-June and will run approximately three months, until September 22.

Bajpai also served as India’s Secretary of the Ministry of External Affairs, the country’s top diplomat, from 1982 to 1983. The son of India’s Agent-General to the United States during World War II, Bajpai spent many of his formative years in Washington, D.C. An expert in security issues, he joined the Indian Foreign Service in 1952. Bajpai served in Germany, Turkey and Pakistan. He was named ambassador to Pakistan from 1976 to 1980, to China from 1980 to 1982 and to the United States from 1984 to 1986.

On retirement from government service in 1986, he entered academic life, working as a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and as the first professor of non-Western studies at Brandeis University. He has been a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation, and the co-founder and chairman of the Delhi Policy Group, an independent policy analysis center in India. The author of numerous articles on diplomacy, foreign affairs and national security, Bajpai was editor of “Democracy and Diversity: Comparing India and the United States” (2007)...


-- K. Shankar Bajpai Named Distinguished Visiting Scholar at Library of Congress' John W. Kluge Center, by Library of Congress, July 21, 2009


Months later, through the Tenduf-las, the owners of the old-fashioned, cozy Windemere [Windamere] Hotel in Darjeeling where we stayed, it was possible to find everything.

Image
The hotel started out as boarding house for bachelor British tea planters in Darjeeling, in what was then British India, were built in 1841 and opened up as a boarding house in the late 1880s. The property named Adda Villa is owned by the family of Robin Mookerjee. It was leased to Tenduf La, a Sikkimese of Tibetan descent, who turned it into a hotel with the name Windamere. The hotel became more widely known as Darjeeling became the Bengal Presidency's summer capital. It expanded and took over a new wing, formerly the Loreto Convent, where the actress Vivien Leigh had spent some years in childhood.

In 1959, Palden Thondup Namgyal, Crown Prince of Sikkim, met his future wife Hope Cooke for the first time in the Windamere Hotel.

The hotel is also known for its views of the tea plantations below and of Mount Kangchenjunga, the third highest peak in the world.

-- Windamere Hotel, by Wikipedia


From our hotel on the highest part of Darjeeling, our group caravan dropped over the backside of the mountain on a winding road down to a turbulent river. Crossing the gorge, we started the climb up the next mountain to enter the Kingdom of Sikkim-about a four-hour scenic drive. Bajpai's men were there, and we passed through the official gate with no problems.

As we approached the official residence, we saw the Bajpais sitting in lawn furniture in front of the government house, having tea. Shankar's round face broke into a wide smile as he welcomed us to Gangtok in his flawless English. Light reflected off his baldpate; he looked like a Buddha in his warm, monk-like robe. Meera had a woolen shawl around her sari. The mountain air was cool.

"Come join us. I'm sure you're all ready for a good hot cup of tea." We blessed the British. And what an enchanted tea it was. Good conversation was as available as good food when around the Bajpais. Oxford-educated Shankar was a popular diplomat for India. His next ambassadorial posts were to China, Pakistan, and the United States.

The next morning, the sun backlighted Kachenjunga, the huge mountain worshipped by the Sikkimese. Through the leaded windows of my room in Raj Bavan, another colonial gingerbread house, I watched the spectacular sunrise. Often the magnificent mountain was hidden by cloud cover, but not this morning. There it was, soaring 29,000 feet into the air, dwarfing the rest of the Himalayan chain. It was so cold as I stood there that I had my electric heater in my hand. Luckily it had a long cord and went everywhere in the room with me, including the bathroom. I set it next to the tub while I splashed hot water over myself from a bucket. The huge, marble bathtub would have taken a week to fill.

Starting out for Rumtek monastery, we were bundled in our coats as we bounced along in our Land Rovers. An hour later, coats were discarded. It had become a lovely, sunny day in the mountains. There was no way to alert the monks that we were coming; we'd just arrive, all 18 of us. We switchbacked over several mountains, until the driver of the front vehicle stopped and pointed to the top of a distant peak.

"Monastery, Memsahib." At that distance we could see nothing. Swinging back and forth on the winding road, we passed between barley fields tended by farmers winnowing grain. Oxen walked slowly in circles, around and around, as they had for centuries. The tidiness of the land bespoke of their care. Bright-cheeked Sikkimese and Tibetan girls called out their traditional greeting, "Jole."

"Mom, stop the car here. I have to take that picture!" Rik demanded. "Those fields with the girls' costumes are great."

There was the monastery-bright red, glistening in the sun. On both sides were rows of prayer flag trees, similar to those I'd seen at Govinda's in Almora on my first visit to India. Behind the monastery, providing a silent frame, were more mountains. My friends were filled with excitement; none had been to a Tibetan monastery.

Image
Monks and Korshak Bakula (Leh)

Image
His Holiness the Sixteenth Gyalwa Karmapa performing the Ceremony of the Vajra Crown (Black Hat) (Rumtek Monastery, Sikkim, 1972)

As we drove to the entrance, the round wooden door, divided in the middle, stood open in welcome. Three burgundy-robed monks stood by to receive us. A high-cheekb-oned Tibetan introduced himself.

"My name is Tashi. We are most happy to welcome you. It is very auspicious. You have arrived just in time for the Black Hat Ceremony. This event takes place once a month at the time of the full moon." We thought it a coincidence; the monks thought otherwise.


"Please follow me." We crossed the enclosed courtyard. Ahead stood the main building. Through the painted doors we could see a high-ceilinged room, filled with long benches on which sat monks of all ages from ancients down to those of five- or six-years-old. A huge, golden Buddha watched over ail. The ceiling held bells of ail descriptions. Long, brocaded panels, statues, butter lamps, and old thangkas cluttered every available spot. Incense curled through the air.

We were led up a worn and uneven wooden staircase to a spacious, high-ceilinged room at the top of the monastery. Both ends of the room were opened to the temple below. We had no sooner seated ourselves on the floor than the ceremony began. We had arrived at curtain time.

Darkly clad monks slowly paraded in with long copper horns, at least eight feet in length. Standing to the side of a high, throne-like chair and platform, they blew long, discordant, sonorous notes. Soon another group arrived, escorting to the seat of honor a stocky young man, who wore a high-peaked, brocaded lama's hat. Adjusting his heavy, gold-embroidered cape, he beamed happiness down upon us. He nodded his head to the monks to proceed.

"That is His Holiness, the Gyalwa Karmapa," Tashi informed me, handing out some papers of explanation. The Karmapa was the sixteenth incarnation of a Tibetan saint, recognized as the embodiment of Avalokitesvara (the Buddha of compassion) who attained enlightenment in one lifetime. His followers are called the Karma Kagyus. The Black Hat, which was made of human hairs in the eleventh century by devoted followers, was believed to have tremendous healing effects for viewers. "The Karmapa and the Dalai Lama are the two God-Kings of Tibet. Sikkim and Bhutan revere especially the Karmapa's line," explained Tashi.

An elaborate brocade box was carried in with much fanfare and presented to the God-King. After opening the box and putting the stiff, black, onion-shaped hat on his head, the Karmapa, with one hand holding the hat in place, closed his eyes in meditation. It was signaled that we follow suit. With my eyes shut I thought to myself, a God-King-how impressive for my friends. Shankar doesn't know this. How lucky we are to be here! Later, as we were each introduced to His Holiness, we presented white prayer scarves, khatas, which Shankar had advised us to take along.

One of my friends could hardly contain himself. "Wait 'til you hear what happened to Winnie." It seemed while his wife was sitting with closed eyes, she had the cherished "golden sun" wash over her entire being. She was still in shock, but radiant.

After the Karmapa left, Tashi asked us, "Would you like to meet our sister?" We, of course, said yes and followed him along an outside ledge to a corner room. It was a breathtaking view as we looked down into the valley over the winding road we had followed. All we could see were brown mountains in every directions.

"You must come back again later, when the mountains are green." Following Tashi through a narrow frame door, I stepped into a small hall; to the left a larger room opened out. As I entered, I gasped in surprise. On a low platform sat an English woman in monk's robes. She appeared to be in her sixties and her large, pale blue eyes looked enormous because of her shaved head.

"Come in, I am Sister Palmo. It is a joy to welcome you."


Recovering from our start, we formed a circle around her on the floor. As we gathered confidence, we asked questions about herself and the significance of the ceremony we had just witnessed.

"What good fortune, coming here on this particular day. It was not accidental; every movement of even a grain of sand is planned." She gently explained some of the basic Buddhist beliefs and traditions to us.

Time flew by, and, unfortunately, being on a tight schedule, we could not remain long enough. Rik took me aside.

"This place is sensational. We simply have to come back here and spend more time with Sister Palmo."

While the group had tea in another room and ate the picnic sandwiches we'd brought, we made our plans with the English nun.

"Yes, yes, do come back. I knew you would want to. We are meant to become friends. If you would be so kind as to bring me a few things from the Gangtok marketplace, I would be so happy. Then you can have lunch here with me."

We decided that Avi, who had joined us in Gangtok, could take the group to Calcutta the next morning, and we'd follow a day later. Shankar had suggested it earlier, "Take more time here. You can use my car and driver to go to the Bagdogra airport any time." In the jeep returning to Gangtok, we chattered like mapgies, awed by our experience at the monastery.

Image
Sister Palmo at the Rumtek Monastery (1972)

That evening, we celebrated with a Tibetan dinner. The table was heaped with all sorts of succulent, hotly spiced vegetable and pork dishes. The Bajpais had outdone themselves, and they seemed proud of us as a group. We came from Argentina, Washington D.C., New York, Beverly Hills, Honolulu, and Hamburg. Included were top social names, a former U.S. Ambassador, a famous choreographer (Tony Duquette), the head of the Beverly Hills Testavant Chevalier (elite gourmet Society) and a woman astrologer, the grandniece of the legendary flying ace of World War II, Baron Manfred Von Richthofen (the Red Baron). Yes, we were an interesting assortment. We, in turn, were honored to meet the Chogyal with his American wife, Hope Cooke, and the General who had accompanied the Dalai Lama on his escape from Lhasa. The Chogyal was charming, Her Highness was shy and aloof, and the General complimented me, "That turquoise amulet you are wearing is an extremely good one."

I had bought it the day before in Gangtok. A Tibetan in dusty robes, wearing one long turquoise and coral earring had tugged at Rik's shirt. We followed him down a little alley and up a broken staircase to a tiny little room where two elderly Tibetan women sat. From under their bed, they pulled out a trunk and carefully unwrapped their treasures wrapped in dirty clothes. The minute I saw the delicate amulet, I knew I wanted it. The price was reasonable, but Rik said, in Spanish, "Mom, you've taught me to bargain. Seventy dollars is a lot in Sikkim, you will get it for less."

By bargaining, I got it for $80. We laughed at the reverse psychology of the Tibetans. The minute we started to bargain, they knew we wanted it and upped the price.

Our group left us early the next morning. Shortly afterward, I initiated Meera Bajpai into TM. Shankar scoffed, but added hastily, "I will not oppose anything that might interest her," remembering my criticism of years before. On his arrival in San Francisco as Consul General, he had been asked about Maharishi by the press. He had replied, "Oh, we laugh at all these holy men who come to the U.S. to make a fortune." I had jumped on him, "Shankar, you have never met Maharishi or taken his course. Why didn't you just say you knew nothing about him?"

By 8 A.M., the marketplace was open. Vegetables, eggs, spices, and all sorts of foodstuffs were spread out on canvasses in front of flimsy stalls. We laughed as we watched one owner beat a cow on the head as he tried to retrieve a bunch of carrots from its mouth. Succeeding, he brushed the orange roots and put them back in place-a sort of Julia Child attitude about a few teeth marks.

Soon we had our baskets filled with bread (a luxury in Rumtek), tomatoes, butter, cream, and all the requested vegetables and fruits. It was time for our return to the monastery.

"How nice to be alone!" Rik said.

Although we enjoyed our group, nearing the end of a 30-day trip, we looked forward to being on our own. Now we were off on the kind of adventure we dearly loved. It was about 11 A.M. when we drove up to the monastery door, giving us at least eight hours of daylight for a nice long visit.

Anila, Sister Palmo's tiny attendant, took our parcels from us with joy and the quick, silent movements of a bird. Sister Palmo was sitting, as she had been when we left her the day before.

"Good morning, what a treat to get all those lovely foods. Come sit near me. Are you sure you wouldn't like chairs brought in?" We assured her not.

She told us a bit about herself. She had been married to an Indian whom she had met while both were students at Oxford. They had three grown children. Their photos were beautiful.

"This one, my son Kabir Bedi, is a leading cinema star in Bombay. He's gone through a painful divorce, but is coming out of it. My husband was a businessman, but now has become a Hindu holy man and psychic healer. At present, he is touring Italy. We meet occasionally, when I go to see my children, and are good friends."

We asked how she had become a nun. "For years I followed Gandhi. One day I was attending a conference, and while walking with some friends, a voice from within spoke to me. It gave me instructions about what I was to do-I was to renounce the world of activity and become a nun in a Buddhist monastery."

Her full face glowed as she remembered. "My husband understood. He had felt the tug himself. It was a natural, happy parting, and we now travel different roads to the same destination."
She must have been a young beauty, I thought. Lovely white skin, but it's hard to tell what a woman with a shaved head would look like with hair.

We discussed her early years as a nun. Evidently, as the highest in the order, she was the confidential assistant to His Holiness. She even discussed the shaving of her head.

"I guess that is the final commitment for a woman," her eyes twinkled. "You know vanity is gone when you see your hair on the floor."

We felt honored as she shared these intimacies with us. Then, abruptly, she changed the subject. "But tell me more about yourselves. What brought you here? How much do you know about Buddhism?"

I spoke first, "Well, I know that the Vedas inspired Gautama Buddha's 'seek out your own salvation,' but that he rejected the Brahmin's interpretation. Born as an Indian prince, he was horrified by what he saw outside the walls of his princely home. Needing to think, to rationalize the 'whys of creation,' he spent hours under the Bodhi tree contemplating. Occasionally he would slip into 'nothingness.' There he was free, free of worries, desires, and emotions. There he experienced total release. Austerities didn't do it, worship didn't do it; contemplation and meditation did it. It brought about the nothingness -- Nirvana!"

"Very good, that's all correct! Buddhism as explained by our Kagyu lineage also states that meditation, while unmasking our deceptions, helps us to know ourselves in the present situation, to face life, and to accept ourselves. It will bring transcendental common sense."


That struck a cord with us. Rik said, "Sister, that happens to be a word we are very aware of, but please go on."

She continued, "And from Buddha's illuminations, where he transcended the limitations of individuality, he replaced the idea of the immutable, eternal soul incapable of growth and development, with the conception of a spiritual consciousness yearning for freedom and enlightenment through the continuous process of becoming and dissolving." She spoke slowly and clearly.

"Those are almost Lama Govinda's words," I exclaimed.

"Yes, he will be known to the West as the first interpreter of Tibetan Buddhism into layman's terms. He helps one understand how we must abandon our thought habits in order to know the real nature of the Mind that encompasses both the individual and the Universe."


Agreeing with the Sister, I added, "The West will welcome his work. Many years ago, wanting to understand something about Buddhism, I read several books on the subject, but I gave up ... to understand them, one had to learn a whole new vocabulary."

"Indeed, and the whole idea was made easy by Buddha when he presented the eight basic rules to live by: Right Thought; Right Understanding; Right Action; Right Speech; Right Livelihood; Right Effort; Right Mindfulness; and Right Concentration."

By following these, one would become "enlightened." No longer would life be directed by attachment. The goal, actually, was to be free from the pressure of the human race.

"But, Sister Palmo, what we don't understand is this: Gautama Buddha was against gods, priests, worship, and dogma. He advised against building monasteries, as did the sages of the Upanishads, warning that, through the problems arising from household responsibilities and positions, jealousies would be born and infighting would develop between superiors and inferiors. All that was important was pure thought. Yet, when he died, they turned him into a god to worship."

"Not exactly-he's worshipped as Buddha, the Enlightened One, not as a god."


Rik and I couldn't see the difference. "Isn't it a shame that man always takes simplicity and complicates it?" mused Rik.

"Man feels more secure in clinging to traditions. He needs sets of commentaries, and philosophical principles that he can classify and put down in sacred texts-man clings to 'things.' He wants to possess and make his knowledge exclusive. Even the Karmapa once admitted to me, 'It took the Red Chinese to force Tibet into sharing its wisdom with the outside world.' That was our bad karma, trying to keep it to ourselves." We admired the English nun for her honesty. What a rare treat this visit was for us. She went on to explain the symbolism found in Buddhist art and the importance it had to all meditative schools. We could have spent a week there sitting at her feet like enthusiastic little school children.

Soon it was time for lunch. Rik and I were hesitant to eat at the monastery, where sanitary conditions were uncertain, so we said we'd had a large breakfast. "Not at all, that was hours ago," insisted the nun. "Anila is cooking our meal in the next room. I have taught her to make crepes."

We couldn't believe it; I watched her cook over a little oil burner in the corner. Everything was spotless. The crepes, when served with cream and honey whipped with butter, were delicious.
I'd been afraid we'd receive "buttered tea" and tsampa, made from roasted gingke, a flour-like barley mixed with yak butter.

"What a treat for me," said Sister Palmo. "Our diet is sparse here. One of the things I miss is toast with my tea. We often go weeks without bread. We raise chickens and goats outside the monastery. So it's an eggs, goat's milk, and grain menu." No wonder the foods we'd brought were thought so dazzling.

Sister Palmo was interested in hearing about Maharishi and his teachings. "He sounds like a wise man, and from the happiness you both exude, one can see it's working." We then urged her to tell us more about her life at the monastery.

She explained in detail her daily routine, how she counted hundreds of thousands of Aum mani padme hum, a Buddhist mantra, on her rosary-type beads, her mala. She told us about visualization, very important in the practice of Buddhism, and the exaltation one felt when the Buddha was seen sitting on a lotus with the honey of compassion dripping down. Even though she detailed it carefully, it was foreign to us and seemed laborious in comparison to our system.

Shortly after lunch, she announced, "Anila has brought a message that His Holiness is ready to receive you." Gathering her robes, she stood up. We had only seen her seated and were surprised to see that she was as tall as I. She walked as an English woman, with good sturdy shoes, taking long decisive steps.

From an outside door, the Karmapa's quarters were on the far side of the monastery. The room was bare, but lighted by many windows. On a small divan-like platform sat His Holiness. Without his hat and heavy cape, he looked younger than he had the day before. Now, he wore a simple wine-red robe. He smiled in welcome, indicating we should sit on cushions near him.

Then we had a surprise. A beautiful Indian woman entered the room. It was Goodie Oberoi. Sister Palmo was delighted to find we knew each other, and left us with Goodie to interpret. "How is it that you are here?" I asked. She had been one of the Indian friends I'd brought to Maharishi for initiation while I was attending the 1969 course in Kashmir. She hadn't mentioned the Karmapa to me.

"His Holiness is my treasured teacher now and has helped me more than anyone in the world." I could understand her need of help. Her life with Bikki, son of the hotel tycoon, had to be difficult. Bikki's love of drinking and women were well-known among the social set of India.

"Sister comes to visit us and now we have one of her nuns with us at home. You have no idea, Nancy, what a wonderful change it has brought over the children. I will always love Maharishi," she continued, "but, for me, I need personal contact with my spiritual guide." Her handsome face looked more serene than I had ever seen it.

Interpreting was difficult. The Karmapa spoke rapidly. His man translated the Tibetan into Hindi; then Goodie put the Hindi into English. It discouraged any substantial penetration of his knowledge. We were left with the simple enjoyment of sitting near him and receiving his serene vibrations.

"This is a most wonderful soul," Goodie explained. "You are fortunate to see him like this and share his darshan. He is revered as a God King by the Sikkimese, Bhutanese, and many Tibetans. He is the Supreme head of the Kagyu Order of Tibetan Buddhism, the embodiment of the power and compassion of Buddhist Tantra. They consider him a higher incarnation than the Dalai Lama. When the Chinese invaded Tibet, India offered the Dalai Lama asylum; likewise the Karmapa, but he came here to Sikkim at the invitation of the Chogyal."

The Karmapa radiated sunshine and he was attentive when we spoke. He appeared to be in his 30s, but I heard later he was almost 50. "He would like to give you a special mantra," Goodie explained. It was an honor we couldn't refuse. We moved close to him. He had been knotting some cords while he spoke and with his expressive hands he now tied both a yellow and red cord around each of our necks. With a small pair of scissors, he cut a lock of hair from our heads.

"It is a great blessing," Goodie explained, "that he would knot the cords and put them around your necks with his own hands. It is unusual, and I'm so happy for you. You have taken refuge in the Buddha with this ceremony."

She wrote down our mantras on a piece of paper, handing it to us with some powder and pills. "Sister Palmo will explain these to you."

The good Sister was overjoyed when she heard what had transpired and clapped her hands. "When you walked into my room today and my thangka of Vajrasattva was exposed, I knew something auspicious would happen. Usually we keep that particular thangka covered."

We told her about the mantras, and she understood our dilemma. "You are right. Stick to what you are doing. But, sometimes on a special full moon, or in a time of danger, you might use them."

She explained the healing qualities of the powder and pills to which I reacted, "Oh, good, I'll take them to my husband." She agreed they might help. (Unfortunately, Tony never saw any apparent effects.)


Then she asked, "Now, may I ask you a favor?" We quickly nodded. "We have a convent in Tulokpur. You mentioned you were on your way to visit His Holiness the Dalai Lama in Dharamsala, after your friends return to the U.S., to photograph the Tibetan New Year's celebration there. Tulokpur is between Dharamsala and Dalhousie. One takes a risk sending money by mail to India, but we need to get money to the monastery to feed the nuns and their cattle. Could we entrust the money to you to deliver?"

We agreed and got all the necessary instructions. We were happy we'd ordered five thangkas to be hand painted for us. We knew our money helped to fill the envelope given us.

Again the day came to an end, far too quickly. Sister Palmo escorted us to the jeep. "We will keep in touch through letters, and one day I will come to see you in the U.S. You will come back to Rumtek. It is written." In fact, the following year she stayed with us in Beverly Hills and made a lasting impression on my family. I felt my children were fortunate to meet such dedicated people.

As we rode down the hill, our minds relived our beautiful experience. "Where else could such a thing happen?" Rik said. "Here we are with the money for their convent's food, and they know nothing about us. We'll have to be so careful not to have anything happen to us, or those poor animals and people will starve!"

Later, we learned, the Karmapa, with his powers, probably knew more about us than we did ourselves! But we were complimented by their blind trust, and we did deliver the money safely.

My encounters with the world of Buddhism started with Lama Govinda, followed by the Dalai Lama, and now continued with the Karmapa. The more I was exposed to their spiritual leaders, the more attracted I became. There was no doubt that I felt a kindred spirit for the Tibetan race. They are bright, outgoing, and friendly in spite of the terrible hardships their people and homeland have suffered; they are optimistic and determined to succeed. Maybe I had been a Tibetan in one of my past lives.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:32 am

Girija Shankar Bajpai
by Wikipedia
Accessed: 6/10/20

Image
Sir Girija Shankar Bajpai, KCSI KBE CIE
Girja Shankar Bajpai with the Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in the first Commonwealth Prime Ministers conference in 1948 in London.
1st Secretary General, Ministry of External Affairs
In office: 1947–1952
Prime Minister: Jawaharlal Nehru
Preceded by: position established
Succeeded by: N. R. Pillai
Personal details
Born: 3 April 1891[1], Allahabad, North-Western Provinces, British India (now in Uttar Pradesh, India)
Died: 5 December 1954 (aged 63), Bombay, Bombay State, India (now Mumbai, Maharashtra)
Nationality: British Indian (1891-1947); Indian (1947-1954)
Children: 7 (4 daughters; 3 sons), including Uma Shankar Bajpai
Alma mater: University of Allahabad, Merton College, Oxford

Sir Girija Shankar Bajpai KCSI KBE CIE (3 April 1891 – 5 December 1954) was an eminent Indian civil servant, diplomat and Governor.

Early life and education

Bajpai was born in Allahabad to an orthodox Kanyakubja Brahmin family originally from Lucknow.[2] He was the second son of Rai Bahadur Pandit Sir Seetla Prasad Bajpai CIE (1865 - 1947), who in the course of his career served as Chief Justice and Minister of Justice of Jaipur State and was knighted in 1939.[3] and to Rukmine Shukla (18?? - 1945).[4][5] He was initially educated at Muir Central College, from where he received a King's Scholarship to Oxford, taking a B.A. from Merton College, Oxford.[6][7]

Career

He entered the ICS on 16 October 1915.[8] He began his career in the (then) United Provinces as an assistant collector and magistrate, receiving a promotion to joint magistrate in May 1918.[1] In April 1921, he was appointed as a secretary to V. S. Srinivasa Sastri, and served in this capacity until November 1922.[1] He was appointed a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) in the 1923 New Year Honours list.[9] From 1923 to 1930, Bajpai served in the Department of Education, Health and Lands, rising from under-secretary in September 1923 to deputy secretary (officiating) in March 1924 and to deputy secretary in June 1926.[1] The secretary of a Government of India delegation to South Africa in 1926, he was appointed a Companion of the Order of the Indian Empire (CIE) in that year's Birthday Honours List.[10] He was promoted to secretary (officiating) in the department of Education, Health and Lands in December 1927 and to joint secretary in November 1929.[1]

From November 1930 to January 1931, Bajpai was a member of the British Indian delegation to the First Round Table Conference in London, and was promoted to the rank of collector and magistrate in October 1931. After a brief posting to South Africa from December 1931 to August 1932, he was appointed as a full secretary in the Department of Education, Health and Lands,[1] and was knighted as a Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire (KBE) in the 1935 Birthday and Silver Jubilee Honours List.[11] In March 1940, Sir Girija was appointed as one of the six members of the Viceroy's Executive Council, the colonial version of a Cabinet, having previously served as a temporary member of the council from 1935 to 1936.[1][12] In October 1941, he was appointed the Agent-General (roughly equivalent to an ambassadorial post) to the USA for India.[1] He was appointed a Knight Commander of the Order of the Star of India (KCSI) in that year's Birthday Honours List.[13]


Sir Girija was known for his ethics, oratory, strong will and far-reaching vision. It is said he warned Prime Minister Nehru about the potential for a Chinese invasion more than a decade before it happened.[14][15] He represented India in numerous international forums in the 1930s and 1940s, including at the UN during the Kashmir debate.[6] American diplomat Mr Vincent Sheean has mentioned in his book "Nehru – The Years of Power" that it was a technical error on part of the team headed by Mr Girija Bajpai which filed India's appeal to the UN Pakistan's invasion in Kashmir which led to the issue being considered a dispute rather than an act of aggression by Pakistan. The appeal should have been made under Chapter 7 of the UN charter rather than Chapter 6.[16]

Following the independence of India from the British Raj in 1947, Prime Minister Nehru retained Sir Girija as his principal foreign affairs adviser, appointing him the first Secretary General in the Ministry of External Affairs.[17]

Later years and death

Bajpai had experienced poor health for some years, and the pressures of the immediate post-Independence years took their toll. In failing health by 1952, he was appointed as the Governor of Bombay State by Nehru, in part to allow him to recuperate. He recovered his health sufficiently to represent India the following year at the UN conferences on the Kashmir dispute, which were held at Geneva. Following his return to India, Sir Girija fell seriously ill in early 1954.[2] He died in office of a cerebral haemorrhage in the early morning of 5 December 1954, aged 63. He lay in state in the audience hall of Raj Bhavan, his body draped with the tricolour as citizens, political leaders and consular officials filed past. Later that day, with thousands of people lining the streets, his corpse was conveyed to the crematorium in a gun carriage drawn by detachments of the army, navy, air force and the Mumbai Police. He was cremated with full ceremonial honours, including a 17-gun salute, fired as his eldest son, Uma Shankar Bajpai, lit the funeral pyre.

The (then) Vice President of India, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, delivered a eulogy in which he said Bajpai's life had been "an example of devotion and dedication" which would be long remembered.[18]

Personal life

Sir Girija Bajpai was known for his wealth and lifestyle. He always dressed impeccably and was considered an authority on clothes, fine wines and carpets. His ethics and strong sense of family responsibility led him to pay off his brother's debts, some of which were run up in his name, several times in an effort to preserve the family's reputation.

Bajpai was married to Rajni Misra of Kanpur, with whom he had four daughters and three sons; Uma Shankar Bajpai, Durga Shankar Bajpai and K.S. Bajpai,

Image
K Shankar Bajpai (l), Indian ambassador to Pakistan in New Delhi on July 20, 1976.


all who became diplomats.
[2] Kanti Bajpai, the son of Uma Shankar, is a noted academic.

K. Shankar Bajpai, Chairman Emeritus
by Delhi Policy Group: Advancing India's Rise as a Leading Power
Accessed: 6/10/20

Image
K.Shankar Bajpai, Former Indian Secretary, External Affairs Ministry, and Ambassador to Pakistan, China and USA.

Born March 30, 1928, in Jaipur, India. Educated St Albans School, Washington D.C. ( Cum Laude, 1944, with prize for English; Editor, School Year Book; co-Chair Government Club).
Merton College, Oxford, (BA Honours in History 1949, MA 1954, President of Indian Club, Film Society and Cosmos Society)
Ecole des Hautes Etudes Universitaire, Geneva 1952
Speaks French, some German, in addition to English and Hindi
Career: Joined Indian Foreign Service 1952, served in Bonn, Ankara, Bern 1955-8, Political Officer, Indian High Commission in Pakistan, 1962-65; In External Affairs Ministry, Under Secretary Arab Affairs, Deputy Secretary UN Affairs, Special Officer for Disarmament 1958-62; Special Officer for Pakistan Affairs and Director Americas, 1966-67.

As Head of Post or Mission Consul General, United States West of the Mississippi, in San Francisco, 67-70; Government of India’s Representative in Sikkim, 70-74; Ambassador to The Netherlands, 1975; High Commissioner to Pakistan, 1976-80; Ambassador to China, 1980-82; Secretary, External Affairs, 1982-83; Ambassador to the USA, 1984-86.

After retirement from government service in 1986, entered academic life: Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies, 87; Regents Professor, University of California, (all campuses) 1987-88; Visiting Professor, University of California, Berkeley, 1989-92; First Professor of Non-Western Studies, Brandeis University, 1992 & 93; Visiting Fellow, Center for International Security & Cooperation, Stanford, ‘02; Senior International Adviser, Merrill Lynch, International, New York 1995-2000; Chairman, Delhi Policy Group, an independent "think-tank", since its founding, ‘94. Also involved in various “track-two” interactions with the USA and Pakistan.


Librarian of Congress James H. Billington has named K. Shankar Bajpai—who served as India’s ambassador to Pakistan, China and the United States—as Distinguished Visiting Scholar at the Library’s John W. Kluge Center.

At the Library, Bajpai hopes to explore the roots and history of Indo-American relations, and to examine more closely the question of post-colonial attitudes towards the colonial experience. Bajpai’s appointment started in mid-June and will run approximately three months, until September 22.

Bajpai also served as India’s Secretary of the Ministry of External Affairs, the country’s top diplomat, from 1982 to 1983. The son of India’s Agent-General to the United States during World War II, Bajpai spent many of his formative years in Washington, D.C. An expert in security issues, he joined the Indian Foreign Service in 1952. Bajpai served in Germany, Turkey and Pakistan. He was named ambassador to Pakistan from 1976 to 1980, to China from 1980 to 1982 and to the United States from 1984 to 1986.

On retirement from government service in 1986, he entered academic life, working as a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and as the first professor of non-Western studies at Brandeis University. He has been a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation, and the co-founder and chairman of the Delhi Policy Group, an independent policy analysis center in India. The author of numerous articles on diplomacy, foreign affairs and national security, Bajpai was editor of “Democracy and Diversity: Comparing India and the United States” (2007)...


-- K. Shankar Bajpai Named Distinguished Visiting Scholar at Library of Congress' John W. Kluge Center, by Library of Congress, July 21, 2009


He was an early notable in Scouting and Guiding in India, and worked to unify their scattered organisations during the pre-independence era.

References

1. The India Office and Burma Office List: 1945. Harrison & Sons, Ltd. 1945. p. 127.
2. "Sir Girija Bajpai: Architect of Indian Diplomacy". The Times. 6 December 1954.
3. London Gazette, 2 January 1939
4. "Bajpai, Sir Seetla Prasad, Rai Bahadur, (19 April 1865–1 Feb. 1947), Chief Justice and Judicial Member of Council, Jaipur, Rajputana". Oxford Index BAJPAI, Seetla Prasad, Rai Bahadur (1865 - 1947), Chief Justice and Judicial Member of Council, Jaipur, Rajputana. 2007. doi:10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U222158.
5. "Bajpai, Sir Girja Shankar (1891-1954), administrator and politician in India". 2004. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/30544.
6. "BAJPAI, Sir Girja Shankar". Marquis Who Was Who in America 1607–1984. Marquis. Retrieved 27 October 2012. – via Credo Reference (subscription required)
7. Levens, R.G.C., ed. (1964). Merton College Register 1900-1964. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. p. 83.
8. "No. 29348". The London Gazette. 2 November 1915. p. 10785.
9. "No. 32782". The London Gazette (Supplement). 29 December 1922. p. 10.
10. "No. 33179". The London Gazette (Supplement). 2 July 1926. p. 4406.
11. "No. 34166". The London Gazette (Supplement). 31 May 1935. p. 3612.
12. "No. 34831". The London Gazette. 16 April 1940. p. 2252.
13. "No. 36033". The London Gazette (Supplement). 28 May 1943. p. 2420.
14. Bajpai, K.S. "Weightlifting". Outlook Magazine. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
15. "Letter from Deputy Prime Minister, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel to Prime Minister Jahawarlal Nehru". The Tribune. 16 October 2012. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
16. Sheean, Vincent (1960). Nehru: The Years of Power. Random House.
17. Kapur, Harish (2009). Foreign Policies of India's Prime Ministers. Delhi: Lancer Publishers. p. 444. ISBN 9780979617485.
18. "This day that age – December 6, 1954". The Hindu. 6 December 2004. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Sun Jun 07, 2020 6:17 am

Selective Sterilization
by E.A. Whitney, M.C.
Birth Control Review [Margaret Sanger]
April, 1933

It has been said that the success of democracy depends upon the quality of its individual elements. This being true it behooves America to do two things. First to encourage the fecundity of those physically and mentally equipped for our civilization, and secondly to restrict the propagation of those physically, mentally and socially inadequate. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the advisability of selective sterilization as one factor to be utilized in restricting such propagation.

It might be well to mention other methods of limiting propagation, some of which have been successfully used. They are:

1 Segregation

2 Restrictive Marriage Laws

3 Eugenic Education

4 General Improvement in Environment

5 Birth Control

The need for segregation is definite and has a distinct value. It is used to a greater degree in this country than anywhere else in the world, but it is hopelessly inadequate. It would be utterly impossible to segregate all physically, mentally and socially unfit. Furthermore, it is not necessary.

Present restrictive marriage laws are designed to prevent inbreeding by forbidding consanguineous marriages. Some states also have laws regarding marriages of individuals afflicted with social diseases, tuberculosis and other conditions. Restrictive legislation regarding the marriage of the mentally and physically handicapped may be worth while, but it would not eliminate such unions.

Eugenic education is of distinct value. The dissemination to prospective parents of knowledge pertaining to human heredity may aid somewhat in restricting the numbers of unfortunate human beings, but such education reaches only a limited number of those who need this knowledge.

A great deal of effort is now being directed towards improving environmental conditions. Plans are made and are being developed both here and abroad which will tend to eliminate slum conditions in large cities. Too much stress can not be laid on environment as a factor in creating inadequacy. Correct living conditions will improve the mental and physical status of future generations tremendously. The mental hygienists have repeatedly shown how frequently mental disorders are the direct result of faulty environment. However, environment is but one factor in the production or correction of unfitness and can never entirely eliminate the far-reaching force of heredity.

Birth control is of importance when it advocates birth selection by encouraging reproduction of the mentally, physically and socially adequate and the birth restriction of those not so equipped. It is to be regretted that birth control instruction does not, as a rule, reach those who need it most. Dr Albert E. Wiggam when addressing the New York Association of Biology Teachers said that morons are multiplying more rapidly than college professors. He stated that at the present rate of birth there will be but 50 descendants in six generations of 1000 Harvard graduates whereas a like number of unskilled workmen will have 100,000 descendants in six generations. It is easily seen that birth control to be of real worth needs to reach all sections of society.

All of the above mentioned measures are useful in their respective fields in curbing the increase of mental, physical and social degeneracy. But it is an unfortunate fact that those who should not reproduce are of such low mentality that they cannot adequately grasp the ideas and meanings of restrictive marriage laws, eugenic education and birth control. Therefore selective sexual sterilization has a distinct place in our efforts to better humankind.

The present conception of the need of human sexual sterilization is of recent origin. The use of this procedure to treat many of the cacogenic people in our midst in order to reduce inadequacy dates back in legal circles to the 1897 Session of the Michigan Legislature At this time a bill was presented proposing sterilization but it failed to be enacted. It was not until 1907 that a statute for sexual sterilization was passed and approved, the Indiana law of March 9, 1907. Although the legal aspect of the present conception of selective sterilization is but thirty-four years old, it has been advocated and used by various institutions for nearly fifty years. One of the first to advocate sterilization as a means of lessening the number of incompetents was Dr Isaac Kerlin of Pennsylvania.

The term ''Selective Sterilization" is used advisedly. Not all of the mental, physical and social inadequates of our population need such measures to prevent the propagation of their kind. Considering the group of degenerates as a whole it is but a relatively small number to whom such a procedure need be applied.

Reference is made throughout this discussion to the mentally, physically and socially inadequates. One might ask who are included m this group, since it is for those so afflicted that sterilizatlon is suggested as a desirable measure. Those classed as inadequate include

1 The Mentally Defective
2 The Mentally Diseased
3 The Epileptics
4 Those afflicted with certain physical disorders, such as Leprosy
5 The Defective Delinquents
6 The Moral Degenerates
7 The Drug Habituates
8 Those afflicted with social disease, such as Syphilis
9 The confirmed Criminals

The present valid statutes in the United States provide for the human sterilization of the following groups of people:

32 affecting the Feeble-minded
18 affecting the Insane
18 affecting the Idiots
18 affecting the Epileptics
16 affecting the Imbeciles
7 affecting the Rapists
7 affecting the Moral Degenerates
7 affecting the Hereditary Recurrent Insanity
6 affecting the Habitual Criminals
2 affecting the Hereditary Criminals

Besides these there is one statute providing for sterilization of each of the following classes:

1 Confirmed Criminals,
2 Two times sex criminals with present moral depravity,
3 Lifers with one previous crime and present moral depravity,
4 Syphilitics,
5 Incurable Chronic Manias,
 6 Dementias,
7 Hereditary Criminals,
8 Diseased and Degenerate People,
9 Sodomists,
10 Those guilty of crimes against nature,
11 Habitual Sexual Criminals

The claim has often been made that the sterilized individual knowing that he cannot reproduce will develop sex promiscuity. If such were the case it is claimed that these individuals would be a potent factor in the spread of social diseases. However, from the best available data on the subject, namely the studies of Gosney and Popenoe in California, there seems to be no foundation for this fear.

Objections have been raised because of religious doctrines. However, many individuals of all creeds and denominations have been sexually sterilized with the consent of their religious advisers. Each case must be considered separately and when facts warrant the advisability of sexual sterilization the religious adviser rarely objects.

The question of proper administration of sexual sterilization laws is often raised. At the present time there is no uniformity in the methods of control of these statutes. In order to obtain uniformity in administration it is necessary to have a general underlying motive for sterilization. As has been shown the present valid statutes provide for sterilization for a variety of reasons. The three principal motives for sterilization are hereditary, therapeutic and punitive. If the individual proves to be mentally, physically or socially inadequate, and the underlying cause of his condition is heredity, he should have the benefits of sterilization. Therapeutic sterilizations are performed In the surgical practice of all hospitals. They are done for a variety of reasons, such as heart disease, kidney disease, pelvic disorders and following a second caesarean section, and no question is ever raised in the legality of the procedure for such conditions. The punitive human sterilization acts have rightly been criticized by the opponents of selective sterilization. At one time seven states had laws punishing convicts by sterilization, but many of these are now declared unconstitutional. Except where the one convicted is definitely an hereditary or moral criminal, sterilization is never justified.

If the basis for such procedures is to be primarily heredity, there is a need for a better system of determining pedigrees. There are but few individuals who know their own family trees intimately. At the present tune our Public School systems are so organized that they can and do gather a great deal of statistical data concerning each child in their care. These organizations could easily undertake scientific pedigree studies and such records might be filed in each State's welfare or eugenic office. These records would be of value for many purposes and would serve as an ever-ready reference for physicians and sociologists as well as eugenists. Such facts as they might establish would be the foundations for the recommendation of selective sterilization, for non-institutionalized physically, mentally or socially inadequate individuals. Whenever the evidence of the inheritance of undesirable qualities through successive generations is potent, and whenever the individual exhibits these traits, then authority for his sexual sterilization should be given.

The question as to who should give such authority is often raised. The physician in attendance is the one best fitted to judge as to the need. After complete medical examination of the individual and careful survey of his history the physician should have the right to request the legal authority for sexual sterilization. In cases where the individual is an institutional charge it should be within the authority of the head of such institutions to have all inadequates sexually sterilized before their release from his custody. Parole would be of greater value and fraught with much less danger were all the mentally, physically and socially inadequate, who might be eligible to parole, sterilized.

The time has arrived when all forward-looking citizens should seriously consider the necessity of dealing with the rising tide of degeneracy. One factor of proven worth is selective sterilization. Its greatest field of usefulness is in selected individual cases of mental, physical or social inadequacy of hereditary origin.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Sun Jun 07, 2020 6:23 am

Corruption, vice and racketeering: The dubious activities of the Swamis of Rishikesh
by Dilip Bobb and Bharat Dogra
India Today
April 5, 2014
ISSUE DATE: June 30, 1978 UPDATED: February 23, 2015 17:07 IST

The recent flurry of allegations against Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and his alleged involvement in the planting of a nuclear device on Nanda Devi has once again focused on the dubious activities of a majority of India's so-called Swamis. INDIA TODAY correspondents Dilip Bobb and Bharat Dogra recently conducted an investigation into the dubious activities of the Swamis of Rishikesh, where corruption, vice and organized racketeering are the rule rather than the exception.

Image
The changing face of spiritualism - an impoverished ascetic lies on a bed of nails

The recent flurry of accusations against India's major religious export, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, and his alleged involvement in the CIA-inspired planting of a nuclear device on Nanda Devi, has resurrected the age-old controversy surrounding the front-runners in the Swami sweepstakes.

Three days before the allegations hit the headlines, Mahesh Yogi's private, six-seater Bell helicopter had been impounded by Indian custom officials for failure on the Yogi's part to produce a valid licence to keep the aircraft in the country.

The Yogi himself was seemingly unconcerned about the recent developments. He was, in fact, snugly ensconced in his "religious university" in snow-clad Switzerland, peddling his patented brand of TM (transcendental meditation) to the locals. "Mahesh Yogi never spends the summer in Rishikesh. Its too hot here... He always stays in Switzerland during the summer months", admitted one of the Yogi's swami spokesman, seated comfortably in the lotus position on a three-inch thick Dunlop matress.

Image
The luxurious, air-conditioned residence of Mahesh Yogi (inset) in Rishikesh

Instant Fame

Surrounding the newly-constructed basement room where the Swami held court, was the sprawling 100-acre "university" that launched the hirsute Yogi into instant international fame because of his connections with George Harrison and the Beatles. The complex itself, a vast, jigsaw-puzzle of architectural aberrations, was uninhabited by the Yogi's major source of income - foreigners in search of instant nirvana.

Apparently the Yogi is more of a crowd-puller than the pre-recorded gospels he preaches on casettes or piped into the more luxurious "guest houses" that litter the campus. "The earnings of the university in Rishikesh are negligible. Our main source of income is from the foreign TM centres and donations from abroad", the Yogi's spokesman frankly admitted.

But while the divine dealings of Mahesh Yogi are cloaked in comparative secrecy - even the locals in Rishikesh know little of the goings-on behind the barbed-wire fence that encircles the Yogi's ashram - his ecclesiastical colleagues have become increasingly blatant in the art of the religious rip-off.

Gateway

Nowhere is this more evident than in the holy city of Rishikesh - "The gateway to heaven" as the tourist brochures describe it. Unfortunately, the yellow brick road leading to the gateway has become overcrowded with swamis of various religious hues, intent on skimming off large measures of the commercial pickings that are available in plentiful supply.

Image
The 13-storied Kailashnand Mission

Lakshman Jhoola, the religious centre of Rishikesh, has become a vast, multi-ringed spiritual circus. The sadhu supine on a bed of nails, the throngs of hairy hippies, the endless rows of lepers, beggars, touts and ganja-smoking ascetics are merely the sideshows. The real religious rake-offs occur within the hallowed portals of the garishly designed ashrams clustered along the banks of the holy Ganges.

The most blatant example of this is the Swami Kailashnand ashram - a 13-storied spiritual supermarket where an average day's take runs into thousands of rupees. Each floor is dedicated to a separate deity, thus widening the number of prospective devotees. Inside, every available space has been converted into a money-spinning stall - there are more collection boxes in the ashram than the number of glass-caged gods enshrined in orderly rows like animals in a zoo.

Commercialism

The first floor of the so-called ashram is devoted to a curio shop, selling bangles, beads and similar baubles ostensibly for spiritual sustenance. The floor above sells herbal medicines which claim to cure anything from asthma to ulcers, while the remaining floors house the hundreds of zoo-like cages occupied by gods for every occasion. There are well over a hundred different deities, each one more grotesque than the next, perched benignly above the inevitable collection boxes.

Swami Kailashnand himself seems to have highly dubious antecedents. He was arrested in 1966 on spying charges and a powerful transmitter was seized from his possession. He was again put under surveillance by the cabinet secretariat in 1973 for alleged involvement in a foreign exchange racket, but somehow managed to wriggle out of that as well.

Image
Some of the 210 meditation-cum-residential rooms in Mahesh Yogi's spiritual centre - buying spiritualism

Recently two employees of the Kailashnand Mission Trust died under highly dubious circumstances, but no action seems to have been taken so far. One possible reason for their infallibility, spiritual as well as physical, is the evidence of political patronage enjoyed by a majority of the better-known swamis. Kailashnand had erected a huge hoarding extolling the virtues of Indira Gandhi's 20-point programme outside his ashram. Needless to say, the hoarding was hastily removed in the wake of the Janata's victory in the March elections.

Religious Mafia

Political patronage, however, is a relatively mild, though necessary evil. Interviews with a number of former employees of some of Rishikesh's ashrams reveal a level of organized corruption, large scale financial fiddling, sexual depravity and gangsterism that would make the Mafia look like boy scouts in comparison.

Interviews with three former employees of one such ashram - the Baba Kali Kamli Wala Panchayati Chettar - offer an insight into the murky underworld of the spiritual soft-sell. Ram Prasad Badhani, an emaciated former clerk in the ashram, was arbitrarily sacked about a year ago by the trustees of the ashram. So far, the ashram has refused to pay him any of the benefits legally due to him, like provident fund, bonus and gratuity.

Image
A curio shop inside the Kailashnand ashram - a spiritual supermarket

"None of the employees have been given their provident fund," he stated. "It is not kept in a fixed deposit in our names but in the name of the ashram. I don't have the money or the contacts to fight them legally, so I have to keep silent." Badhani pulled out a file containing letters of complaints he has sent to the Home Ministry, and other Government departments, none of which have taken any action in the matter.

Badhani also named three former ashram employees (Bandhu Ram, Om Prakash and Nand Ram) who had died in service. Their widows have still to see any of the accumulated dues they are entitled to. "We are also scared of the goondas hired by most of the swamis in Rishikesh," said Kalawati, one of the widows. She has, however, refused to vacate her tiny, claustrophobic room belonging to the ashram, even though the ashram management has cut off her water and electricity supply.

Financial Fiddling

The interviewees, along with some current employees of the ashram who refuse to be named, outlined some facets of the financial fiddling that takes place under the mantle of spiritualism. For instance, a large number of donors send money to the ashrams for having rooms built in their names. A majority of these rooms do not exist, though the donors are told the opposite.

Image
Lakshman Jhoola - gateway to a dubious heaven

"In some cases," said the treasurer of one of the ashrams, "the donors write and tell us they are coming for a visit. All we do is replace the name on one of the rooms with that of the donor, and nobody suspects that thousands of rupees are being embezzled every month."

Another favourite fiddle is the langars (free kitchens) organized by the ashrams ostensibly to feed the destitute. Most ashrams claim langars are organized for about 500 people. In reality they may feed a mere handful. Since most of the finances for the langars is sent from donors outside Rishikesh, the balance of the money is tucked away under a saffron-coloured sarong.

Grants

Ironically, another common practice is siphoning off Government grants given to religious trusts. Almost all the ashrams receive grants for maintaining cows and cowsheds. The milk products from this are supposed to be distributed to the poor and the needy. Instead, it is blatantly sold in the open market.

In fact, some ashrams getting such grants don't even bother to purchase cows, but merely pocket the money instead. Government grants are also given for Sanskrit schools, most of which exist only on paper. According to one of its former employees, the Kali Kamli ashram was still getting a school grant though the school had closed down 1-1/2 years ago.

Image
One of the many sideshows in Rishikesh's religious circus

Trustees

The Kali Kamli ashram is in fact a massive commercial enterprise. According to its brochure for 1972 (the latest available at the ashram) the board of trustees reads like a "Who's Who" of politics and industry. According to ashram employees, the industrialists are not seeking spiritual rebirth, but recycling of their finances.

They allege that since the ashrams operate as "charitable trusts", the opportunities for financial laundering and tax evasion is almost limitless. They also claimed that the ashram's funds, which originate mainly from the big industrialists, are reinvested in the same industrial houses as loans on very low interest rates. Moreover, whatever "donations" are ploughed into the trusts by industrialists and politicians are non-taxable.

Incentive

Another major incentive is the concessions offered to these institutions under the Land Ceiling act. A major portion of the real estate in Rishikesh and the surrounding areas is owned by the ashrams or the presiding high priests of the temples.

The Kali Kamli trust alone owns large orchards in Rishikesh and Kurukshetra covering a total area of approximately 1,000 acres. The farm produce is mainly commercial crops like sugar-cane, oilseeds, wheat and fruits, all ostensibly meant for religious purposes. The trust also owns shops, hotels and eating places in the town.

Pay-offs

Other allegations include payoffs to police officials and local judicial officers to ensure that the status quo is not disturbed. According to one estimate, 90 per cent of the religious centres in Rishikesh allegedly indulge in large scale bribery of the local law enforcement agencies.

The situation is not common to Rishikesh alone. Almost every single religious centre in the country has succumbed to the earthly temptation of instant fortune and fame, however dubious the fame might be. "Let the Government keep the Yogi's helicopter. We got it for free. We are not going to pay the 200 per cent duty required to release it", said Mahesh Yogi's spokesman in Rishikesh. It is also an indication that, to misquote a famous song, the saints have gone marching out, and the sinners have marched in.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Tue Jun 09, 2020 7:35 am

Sonam Topgyal Kazi (Tibetan writer and translator)
by Wikipedia (translated from French)
Accessed: 6/9/20

Sikkimese linguist Sonam T. Kazi quietly passed away last month, reportedly from complications associated with Alzheimer's (although I have been unable to confirm this). He was a long-time political operative, who once served as the Dalai Lama's interpreter on behalf of the Government of India. His avocation was scholastic study of Dzogchen, and in this he became rather celebrated.

In the 1960s, a contractual relationship as a linguist with the U.S. government enabled Mr. Kazi to relocate to the United States. After traveling around a bit, he settled with his wife and daughter in New York City, and when his government contract dissolved, established himself as something of a teacher. Throughout the late 1960s and into the 1970s, he became known for taking on students who had been deemed unsuitable by lineage-holding masters, and developed a small following which regularly met in his apartment on the West Side, overlooking Central Park.

Some considerable controversy visited Kazi after a succession of female students accused him of pressuring them into sexual assignations. Amid allegations that he had infected a student with a sexually transmitted disease, his marriage faltered, and his wife and daughter took up separate residence elsewhere....

Reader Comment:

"With that in mind, I hope the late Mr. Kazi will be remembered with equanimity (if not necessarily admiration) for the good things he accomplished."


Yes, let us forget that he coerced women, even married women, who trusted him with their spiritual well-being, to have sex with him, giving them STD's, terrorizing them with threats of hell for "samaya breakage" if they refuse. But hey, since he REALLY worshiped his guru, there's a place for him in heaven anyway! lets praise a man that reverted to the guru business when his other gigs failed. all hail the snake-oil salesmen of the world. gotta love religion. -- love, an ex-sycophantic follower of the Kazi family, professional parasites.

-- Sonam Topgay Kazi, 1925-2009, by Digital Tibetan Buddhist Altar


Image
Sonam Topgyal Kazi alongside Bakula Rinpoche and the Dalai Lama in 1957
Biography
Birth: January 1, 1925
Death: June 13, 2009 (at 84)
Activity: Writer

Summary

Sonam Topgyal Kazi, or Sonam T. Kazi or Sonam Topgay Kazi ( Tibetan : བསོད་ ནམས་ སྟོབས་ རྒྱལ་ ཀ་ ཛི, Wylie: bsod nams stobs rgyal ka dzi ), born in Rhenock (en) in Sikkim on January 1, 1925 and died in Saugerties, New York [ 1 ] June 13, 2009, is a writer and translator from the Tibetan born in Sikkim. A specialist in Dzogchen, he has translated many works.

Biography

Born in Sikkim in 1925, he was the 5th son of Relon Sonam Dadul Renock Kazi, an official in the government of Sikkim. During his childhood, his father, who twice met the 13th Dalai Lama, shared with him his knowledge about Tibet, arousing his interest in Tibetan Buddhism.

The young boy is a student of the Scottish Universities Mission Institution in Kalimpong and Saint-Etienne College in Delhi [2].

Image

At the end of his studies in 1948, the government of Sikkim appointed him interpreter and guide during the first pilgrimage visit to India of the 16th karmapa [1].

When a position becomes available in Tibet, he becomes a candidate and becomes an interpreter and translator with the Indian mission in Tibet between January 1949 and October 1955 [3], [4].

In 1956, with the Indian diplomat Apa Pant and the crown prince of Sikkim Palden Thondup Namgyal, he received, on the Indian side of Nathu La, the 14th Dalai Lama when he went to India on the occasion of the 2,500th anniversary. of the birth of Siddhartha Gautama Buddha, of November 1956 at February 1957 [5].

Sonam Togpyal Kazi visited Tibet in 1957-58 as a member of an Indian delegation to consider a visit by Indian Prime Minister Nehru, which took place in october 1958 [6].

Sonam Togpyal Kazi was sent by the government of India to welcome the 14th Dalai Lama when he arrived in exile in India in 1959. He was the main interpreter of the Dalai Lama for 13 years, until 1972 [7].

He helps David Armine Howarth in the translation into English of the first autobiography of the Dalai Lama, My land and my people [8] published in 1962.

In 1965, he was director of the Tibet House in India, and wrote the Wisdom and Compassion catalog of Tibetan art exhibitions in New Delhi [9].

He welcomed Thomas Merton when he visited the Dalai Lama in Dharamsala in 1968 [7].

Sonam Kazi supervised certain aspects of the editing of Arnaud Desjardins ' films on Tibetan masters, and it was for this reason that he went to France in 1968 [10].

According to Havnevik Hanna, quoting Arnaud Desjardins, the daughter of Sonam Togpyal Kazi, Jetsun Péma, was recognized by the 14th Dalai Lama and the 16th Karmapa as the reincarnation of Jetsun Lochen Rinpoche (Lochen Chönyi Zangmo) who was a teacher of Sonam Topgyal Kazi and his wife [11].

Image

He declared in his writings that Tibet was a peaceful and independent country [12], in particular in a report of his experience in Tibet before the Chinese invasion published in 1994 and quoted by Melvyn C. Goldstein [13], [14]. This important testimony for Tibetans was published in 1994 in Tibetan Bulletin [14].

Works

• 1993 Kun-Zang La-May Zhal-Lung: The Oral Instruction of Kun-Zang La-Ma on the Preliminary Practices of Dzog-Ch'En Long-Ch'En Nying-Tig (Nga-Gyur Nying-Ma ), Volumes 2 à 3, Sonam T. Kazi translation, Diamond Lotus Pub, 1989.
• 1981 Encyclopedia Tibetica: the collected works of Bo-doń Paṇ-chen Phyogs-las-rnam-rgyal, (Bodong Chögle Namgyel) Volume 1, Ed. Tibet House
• 1975 The collected works of Kun-mkhyen, Jigme Lingpa
• 1977 bKe'vielm. bKa 'brgyad bde gshegs' dus pa'ichos skor, Nyangrel Nyima Özer
• 1969 The Redaction of Rdzogs-chen Rgyal-sras Gzhan-phan-mtha'-yas Volume 3 Gyalse Shenpen Thaye
• 1969 Rang grol skor gsum and Byang chub kyi sems kun byed rgyal po'i don khrid rin chen gru bo: sources for the understanding of Rdzogs-chen meditation Longchenpa
• 1970 The visionary and mystic poetry of Khams-smyon dharma-sengge (Khams-smyon dharma-sengge or Karma Jigme Chokyi Singye)
• 1971 Mi-pham on the Kālacakra tantra: a reproduction of the two volumes from the collected works of 'Jam-mgon' Ju Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho dealing with the cycle of the Wheel of time, Jamgon Ju Mipham Gyatso

Notes and references

1.Sonam T. Kazi (1925-2009), Diamond Lotus Foundation
2. Thomas Merton, The Asian Journal of Thomas Merton, New Directions Publishing, 1975, (ISBN 0811205703 and 9780811205702), p. 172.
3. Statement by Westerners who visited Tibet before 1949, September 13, 1994.
4. A brief account of Mr. Sonam T. Kazi's experience in Tibet before the Chinese Invasion, September 13, 1994.
5. Tenzin Gyatso, Au loin la liberté, Fayard, 1990 (ISBN2213025614), pages 166-167.
6. India's Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru accompanied by his daughter Indira Gandhi trek North to visit Tibet.
7. Bhuchung K. Tsering, Sonam T. Kazi, Aide to the Dalai Lama, Passes Away, July 1, 2009.
8. Turrell Wylie, My Land and My People, The Journal of Asian Studies, Volume 22 / Issue 02, February 1963, p 220
9. (in) Jeffrey Hopkins, Tibetan Monastic Colleges: Rationality versus the Demands of Allegiance, in Imagining Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies, edited by Thierry Dodin, Heinz Räther, Heinz Rather, p. 247
10. Claude Arpi, The Message from the Tibetan Rinpoche, Interview with Arnaud Desjardins.
11. Havnevik Hanna, Fighting of the Tibetan Nuns, 1995, Ed. Dharma, (ISBN 2-86487-025-8).
12. Jamyang Norbu, A Losar Gift For Rangzen Activists, Phayul.com, February 26, 2009
13. Melvyn C. Goldstein, A History of Modern Tibet, Vol. 2: The Calm Before the Storm: 1951-1955, University of California Press, 2007 ( ISBN 0520249410 and 978-0520249417), p. 47
14. Robert Barnett, Violated Specialness: Western Political Representations of Tibet, in Dodin and Räther, Imagining Tibet, p. 310

External Links

• Authority records:
• Virtual international authority file
• International Standard Name Identifier
• National Library of France ( data )
• University documentation system
• Library of Congress
• Royal Netherlands Library
• WorldCat
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Freda Bedi Cont'd (#2)

Postby admin » Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:57 pm

Nancy Cooke de Herrera [Nancy Louise Veitch]
by Wikipedia
Accessed: 6/9/20

In 1970, Shankar Bajpai wrote, suggesting we visit him in Gangtok, Sikkim. He had been the Indian Consul General in San Francisco in the '60s, and we'd met through B.K. Nehru. Now he was the Political Officer of Sikkim, which meant he ran the place, as India provided the small mountain country with its foreign policy, currency, and military presence... His letter was provocative, "Two hours from Gangtok there is an exotic monastery in Rumtek. The top boy is a very important Tibetan Lama. Rik will get dramatic pictures and you can have the thrill of knowing another saint."

He loved to kid me about my holy friends.

We decided to do it and put a group of friends together. Taking people to India was turning out to be a new hobby for me. Shankar and his wife, Meera, were delighted. He wrote again, "Before you leave Darjeeling, call me. It's always a frightful bore at the border. Just to be on the safe side, I'll have my men waiting for you. And by the way, do you suppose you could bring me about 12 pounds of fresh pork? If so, we'll have an authentic Tibetan dinner for you."...

As we approached the official residence, we saw the Bajpais sitting in lawn furniture in front of the government house, having tea. Shankar's round face broke into a wide smile as he welcomed us to Gangtok in his flawless English. Light reflected off his baldpate; he looked like a Buddha in his warm, monk-like robe. Meera had a woolen shawl around her sari. The mountain air was cool.

"Come join us. I'm sure you're all ready for a good hot cup of tea."...

Starting out for Rumtek monastery, we were bundled in our coats as we bounced along in our Land Rovers. An hour later, coats were discarded. It had become a lovely, sunny day in the mountains. There was no way to alert the monks that we were coming; we'd just arrive, all 18 of us....

There was the monastery-bright red, glistening in the sun. On both sides were rows of prayer flag trees, similar to those I'd seen at Govinda's in Almora on my first visit to India. Behind the monastery, providing a silent frame, were more mountains. My friends were filled with excitement; none had been to a Tibetan monastery.

As we drove to the entrance, the round wooden door, divided in the middle, stood open in welcome. Three burgundy-robed monks stood by to receive us. A high-cheek-boned Tibetan introduced himself.

"My name is Tashi. We are most happy to welcome you. It is very auspicious. You have arrived just in time for the Black Hat Ceremony. This event takes place once a month at the time of the full moon." We thought it a coincidence; the monks thought otherwise....

We were led up a worn and uneven wooden staircase to a spacious, high-ceilinged room at the top of the monastery. Both ends of the room were opened to the temple below. We had no sooner seated ourselves on the floor than the ceremony began. We had arrived at curtain time.


Darkly clad monks slowly paraded in with long copper horns, at least eight feet in length. Standing to the side of a high, throne-like chair and platform, they blew long, discordant, sonorous notes. Soon another group arrived, escorting to the seat of honor a stocky young man, who wore a high-peaked, brocaded lama's hat. Adjusting his heavy, gold-embroidered cape, he beamed happiness down upon us. He nodded his head to the monks to proceed....

An elaborate brocade box was carried in with much fanfare and presented to the God-King. After opening the box and putting the stiff, black, onion-shaped hat on his head, the Karmapa, with one hand holding the hat in place, closed his eyes in meditation. It was signaled that we follow suit. With my eyes shut I thought to myself, a God-King-how impressive for my friends. Shankar doesn't know this. How lucky we are to be here! Later, as we were each introduced to His Holiness, we presented white prayer scarves, khatas, which Shankar had advised us to take along....

After the Karmapa left, Tashi asked us, "Would you like to meet our sister?" We, of course, said yes and followed him along an outside ledge to a corner room. It was a breathtaking view as we looked down into the valley over the winding road we had followed. All we could see were brown mountains in every directions.

"You must come back again later, when the mountains are green." Following Tashi through a narrow frame door, I stepped into a small hall; to the left a larger room opened out. As I entered, I gasped in surprise. On a low platform sat an English woman in monk's robes. She appeared to be in her sixties and her large, pale blue eyes looked enormous because of her shaved head.

"Come in, I am Sister Palmo. It is a joy to welcome you."...

"What good fortune, coming here on this particular day. It was not accidental; every movement of even a grain of sand is planned." She gently explained some of the basic Buddhist beliefs and traditions to us.....

While the group had tea in another room and ate the picnic sandwiches we'd brought, we made our plans with the English nun.

"Yes, yes, do come back. I knew you would want to. We are meant to become friends. If you would be so kind as to bring me a few things from the Gangtok marketplace, I would be so happy. Then you can have lunch here with me."...


That evening, we celebrated with a Tibetan dinner. The table was heaped with all sorts of succulent, hotly spiced vegetable and pork dishes. The Bajpais had outdone themselves, and they seemed proud of us as a group. We came from Argentina, Washington D.C., New York, Beverly Hills, Honolulu, and Hamburg. Included were top social names, a former U.S. Ambassador, a famous choreographer (Tony Duquette), the head of the Beverly Hills Testavant Chevalier (elite gourmet Society) and a woman astrologer, the grandniece of the legendary flying ace of World War II, Baron Manfred Von Richthofen (the Red Baron). Yes, we were an interesting assortment. We, in turn, were honored to meet the Chogyal with his American wife, Hope Cooke, and the General who had accompanied the Dalai Lama on his escape from Lhasa....

Our group left us early the next morning. Shortly afterward, I initiated Meera Bajpai into TM....

By 8 A.M., the marketplace was open. Vegetables, eggs, spices, and all sorts of foodstuffs were spread out on canvasses in front of flimsy stalls. We laughed as we watched one owner beat a cow on the head as he tried to retrieve a bunch of carrots from its mouth....

Soon we had our baskets filled with bread (a luxury in Rumtek), tomatoes, butter, cream, and all the requested vegetables and fruits. It was time for our return to the monastery....

It was about 11 A.M. when we drove up to the monastery door, giving us at least eight hours of daylight for a nice long visit.

Anila, Sister Palmo's tiny attendant, took our parcels from us with joy and the quick, silent movements of a bird. Sister Palmo was sitting, as she had been when we left her the day before.

"Good morning, what a treat to get all those lovely foods. Come sit near me. Are you sure you wouldn't like chairs brought in?" We assured her not.

She told us a bit about herself. She had been married to an Indian whom she had met while both were students at Oxford. They had three grown children. Their photos were beautiful.

"This one, my son Kabir Bedi, is a leading cinema star in Bombay. He's gone through a painful divorce, but is coming out of it. My husband was a businessman, but now has become a Hindu holy man and psychic healer. At present, he is touring Italy. We meet occasionally, when I go to see my children, and are good friends."

We asked how she had become a nun. "For years I followed Gandhi. One day I was attending a conference, and while walking with some friends, a voice from within spoke to me. It gave me instructions about what I was to do -- I was to renounce the world of activity and become a nun in a Buddhist monastery."

Her full face glowed as she remembered. "My husband understood. He had felt the tug himself. It was a natural, happy parting, and we now travel different roads to the same destination."...

We felt honored as she shared these intimacies with us. Then, abruptly, she changed the subject. "But tell me more about yourselves. What brought you here? How much do you know about Buddhism?"

I spoke first, "Well, I know that the Vedas inspired Gautama Buddha's 'seek out your own salvation,' but that he rejected the Brahmin's interpretation. Born as an Indian prince, he was horrified by what he saw outside the walls of his princely home. Needing to think, to rationalize the 'whys of creation,' he spent hours under the Bodhi tree contemplating. Occasionally he would slip into 'nothingness.' There he was free, free of worries, desires, and emotions. There he experienced total release. Austerities didn't do it, worship didn't do it; contemplation and meditation did it. It brought about the nothingness -- Nirvana!"

"Very good, that's all correct! Buddhism as explained by our Kagyu lineage also states that meditation, while unmasking our deceptions, helps us to know ourselves in the present situation, to face life, and to accept ourselves. It will bring transcendental common sense."...

She continued, "And from Buddha's illuminations, where he transcended the limitations of individuality, he replaced the idea of the immutable, eternal soul incapable of growth and development, with the conception of a spiritual consciousness yearning for freedom and enlightenment through the continuous process of becoming and dissolving." She spoke slowly and clearly.

"Those are almost Lama Govinda's words," I exclaimed.

"Yes, he will be known to the West as the first interpreter of Tibetan Buddhism into layman's terms. He helps one understand how we must abandon our thought habits in order to know the real nature of the Mind that encompasses both the individual and the Universe."...

"But, Sister Palmo, what we don't understand is this: Gautama Buddha was against gods, priests, worship, and dogma. He advised against building monasteries, as did the sages of the Upanishads, warning that, through the problems arising from household responsibilities and positions, jealousies would be born and infighting would develop between superiors and inferiors. All that was important was pure thought. Yet, when he died, they turned him into a god to worship."

"Not exactly -- he's worshipped as Buddha, the Enlightened One, not as a god."...

"Man feels more secure in clinging to traditions. He needs sets of commentaries, and philosophical principles that he can classify and put down in sacred texts -- man clings to 'things.' He wants to possess and make his knowledge exclusive. Even the Karmapa once admitted to me, 'It took the Red Chinese to force Tibet into sharing its wisdom with the outside world.' That was our bad karma, trying to keep it to ourselves."...

Soon it was time for lunch. Rik and I were hesitant to eat at the monastery, where sanitary conditions were uncertain, so we said we'd had a large breakfast. "Not at all, that was hours ago," insisted the nun. "Anila is cooking our meal in the next room. I have taught her to make crepes."

We couldn't believe it; I watched her cook over a little oil burner in the corner. Everything was spotless. The crepes, when served with cream and honey whipped with butter, were delicious....

"What a treat for me," said Sister Palmo. "Our diet is sparse here. One of the things I miss is toast with my tea. We often go weeks without bread. We raise chickens and goats outside the monastery. So it's an eggs, goat's milk, and grain menu."...

Sister Palmo was interested in hearing about Maharishi and his teachings. "He sounds like a wise man, and from the happiness you both exude, one can see it's working."...

She explained in detail her daily routine, how she counted hundreds of thousands of Aum mani padme hum, a Buddhist mantra, on her rosary-type beads, her mala. She told us about visualization, very important in the practice of Buddhism, and the exaltation one felt when the Buddha was seen sitting on a lotus with the honey of compassion dripping down....


Shortly after lunch, she announced, "Anila has brought a message that His Holiness is ready to receive you."...

The room was bare, but lighted by many windows. On a small divan-like platform sat His Holiness. Without his hat and heavy cape, he looked younger than he had the day before. Now, he wore a simple wine-red robe. He smiled in welcome, indicating we should sit on cushions near him.

Then we had a surprise. A beautiful Indian woman entered the room. It was Goodie Oberoi. Sister Palmo was delighted to find we knew each other, and left us with Goodie to interpret. "How is it that you are here?" I asked. She had been one of the Indian friends I'd brought to Maharishi for initiation while I was attending the 1969 course in Kashmir. She hadn't mentioned the Karmapa to me.

"His Holiness is my treasured teacher now and has helped me more than anyone in the world." I could understand her need of help. Her life with Bikki, son of the hotel tycoon, had to be difficult. Bikki's love of drinking and women were well-known among the social set of India.

"Sister comes to visit us and now we have one of her nuns with us at home. You have no idea, Nancy, what a wonderful change it has brought over the children. I will always love Maharishi," she continued, "but, for me, I need personal contact with my spiritual guide." Her handsome face looked more serene than I had ever seen it....

"This is a most wonderful soul," Goodie explained. "You are fortunate to see him like this and share his darshan. He is revered as a God King by the Sikkimese, Bhutanese, and many Tibetans. He is the Supreme head of the Kagyu Order of Tibetan Buddhism, the embodiment of the power and compassion of Buddhist Tantra. They consider him a higher incarnation than the Dalai Lama. When the Chinese invaded Tibet, India offered the Dalai Lama asylum; likewise the Karmapa, but he came here to Sikkim at the invitation of the Chogyal."

The Karmapa radiated sunshine and he was attentive when we spoke. He appeared to be in his 30s, but I heard later he was almost 50. "He would like to give you a special mantra," Goodie explained. It was an honor we couldn't refuse. We moved close to him. He had been knotting some cords while he spoke and with his expressive hands he now tied both a yellow and red cord around each of our necks. With a small pair of scissors, he cut a lock of hair from our heads.

"It is a great blessing," Goodie explained, "that he would knot the cords and put them around your necks with his own hands. It is unusual, and I'm so happy for you. You have taken refuge in the Buddha with this ceremony."

She wrote down our mantras on a piece of paper, handing it to us with some powder and pills. "Sister Palmo will explain these to you."

The good Sister was overjoyed when she heard what had transpired and clapped her hands. "When you walked into my room today and my thangka of Vajrasattva was exposed, I knew something auspicious would happen. Usually we keep that particular thangka covered."

We told her about the mantras, and she understood our dilemma. "You are right. Stick to what you are doing. But, sometimes on a special full moon, or in a time of danger, you might use them."

She explained the healing qualities of the powder and pills to which I reacted, "Oh, good, I'll take them to my husband." She agreed they might help. (Unfortunately, Tony never saw any apparent effects.)...

Again the day came to an end, far too quickly. Sister Palmo escorted us to the jeep. "We will keep in touch through letters, and one day I will come to see you in the U.S. You will come back to Rumtek. It is written." In fact, the following year she stayed with us in Beverly Hills and made a lasting impression on my family. I felt my children were fortunate to meet such dedicated people....

My encounters with the world of Buddhism started with Lama Govinda, followed by the Dalai Lama, and now continued with the Karmapa. The more I was exposed to their spiritual leaders, the more attracted I became. There was no doubt that I felt a kindred spirit for the Tibetan race. They are bright, outgoing, and friendly in spite of the terrible hardships their people and homeland have suffered; they are optimistic and determined to succeed. Maybe I had been a Tibetan in one of my past lives.


-- Chapter 23. Politicians versus Saints. Excerpt from "All You Need is Love: An Eyewitness Account of When Spirituality Spread from the East to the West", by Nancy Cooke de Herrera


Image

Nancy Cooke de Herrera
Born: Nancy L. Veitch, April 12, 1922[1][2], Alameda County, California[1] [daughter of Edward Irving Veitch and Marie Beatrice Morledge]
Died: February 28, 2013 (aged 90), Beverly Hills, California[3]
Occupation: Socialite author
Spouse(s): Richard [Alexander] Cooke, [Jr.] (1941), Luis de Herrera (1951), Tony Jackson [Morton Barrows Jackson] (1962)
Children: One daughter, three sons

Nancy Cooke de Herrera (born Nancy Veitch, 1922–2013)[2] was an American socialite, fashion expert, and author of three books, including All You Need Is Love: An Eyewitness Account of When Spirituality Spread from the East to the West.[4][5] She was referred to as one of the pioneers of the spiritual movement in the West.

Early life and education

De Herrera grew up in Piedmont, California and studied bacteriology at Stanford University for three years during the 1940s (Class of '43).[6][7]

Adult life

De Herrera traveled to Molokai in Hawaii via a military convoy...

Image
Name: Hawaiian Merchant; USS Euryale (AS-22)
Namesake: Euryale
Builder: Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock Company
Launched: 12 April 1941
Sponsored by: Mrs. Richard A. Cooke
Acquired: purchased by Navy 15 April 1943
Commissioned: 2 December 1943
Decommissioned: 7 October 1946

USS Euryale (AS-22) was built as the Hawaiian Merchant by the Federal Shipbuilding and Drydock Company in Kearny, New Jersey for the Matson Navigation Company. Hawaiian Merchant was launched 12 April 1941, minutes after sister ship Hawaiian Shipper, and was completed April 1941. Matson intended the ship to join Hawaiian Planter and Hawaiian Shipper in the U.S. Pacific Coast—Australia route. The ship was under United States Army Transportation Corps charter when the United States went to war and came under the control of the War Shipping Administration which allocated the ship to the Army's continued charter until the ship was purchased 15 April 1943 by the United States Navy and commissioned 2 December 1943 as USS Euryale (AS-22), serving as a submarine tender through the war. Euryale was decommissioned 7 October 1946, going into reserve until 9 August 1972 when she was delivered to the Maritime Administration with immediate sale to American Ship Dismantler, Inc. for disposal.

-- USS Euryale (AS-22), by Wikipedia


and married Richard [Alexander] Cooke, Jr., the son of a well-known missionary family in 1941.[7][8]

Image

Richard Alexander Cooke, one of the founders of La Pietra Hawaii School for Girls, died Wednesday in San Mateo, Calif. He was 84.

Along with his second wife, Lorraine, he helped found the all-girls school in the early 1960s. Richard Cooke also helped secure the Dillingham Estate for the school's campus on the slopes of Diamond Head.

Cooke worked for C. Brewer & Co. for 27 years before leaving to run for political office and found his own company, Richard Cooke Developments Inc., which later became Richard Cooke Construction and Pole Houses of Hawaii. He also was president of the Cooke Foundation Ltd.

Cooke was the great-grandson of missionary Amos Starr Cooke.


While at Yale University in the 1930s, he qualified for the Olympic swim team. He served in the Navy during World War II.

A world traveler with an artistic bent, Cooke had a life-long interest in sculpting and published a 1964 book on his travels, "Once Around Lightly."

He is survived by his wife, Vivienne; children, Richard III [Richard Cooke III, "Rik"], Starr, Brett, Marcia Duff, Brian Farquharson and Cynthia de Moucheron; and sisters Patricia Peacock and Dagmar Heglund.

A service will be held at 4 p.m. Tuesday at Kawaiahao Church. In lieu of flowers, the family asks donations to La Pietra Hawaii School for Girls, the Moloka'i Community Services Council or Mission Houses Museum.

-- Death of Richard Alexander Cooke, age 84, 13 Jan. 1999; Richard A. Cooke, 84, La Pietra founder, by Advertiser Staff


As the wife of a prominent family member, she performed hostess duties for Admiral Nimitz, Admiral Halsey, and Admiral Towers during World War II. She gave birth to three sons and divorced her husband after nine years of marriage.

While in Paris in 1951, she met a member of the American team that raced at Le Mans, named Luis de Herrera, whom she married a year later. The couple moved to Herrera's home country of Argentina and had a daughter in 1954.[7] Nine months later her husband, Luis, died of leukemia which Cooke de Herrera believed was related to atomic radiation exposure he incurred while driving near Zion National Park after an atomic bomb test in 1953.[4][6][7][9]

In 1957, de Herrera won a nationwide contest sponsored by a group of American (USA) magazines. Her prize was a world tour to promote American fashion. Afterwards, the United States Information Service (USIS) enabled her to visit governments around the world and advise them on fashion.[10] For twelve years she was a leading figure in the fashion industry and was referred to as the "U.S. Ambassadress of Fashion" while traveling to 15 countries to present American couture.[4][6][9] She also presented lectures entitled: "A Travelogue through Fashion" and "Around the World with Nancy Cooke".[11]

Image

De Herrera worked as a publicist for Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in the 1960s and traveled with him on a trip to South America.[7][12] She was the liaison for the Maharishi and The Beatles during their widely publicized visit to Rishikesh in India.[6] During her dozens of trips to India and Tibet she is reported to have had meetings with the Dalai Lama, the sixteenth Gyalwa Karmapa, Sir Edmund Hillary, the Shah of Iran, King Hussein of Jordan, and Satya Sai Baba.[6] In 1993, she published the autobiographical memoir, Beyond Gurus: A Woman Of Many Worlds, and in 2003, published a follow-up book called, All You Need Is Love: An Eyewitness Account of When Spirituality Spread from the East to the West.[4]

Over the years she is reported to have given meditation lessons to several celebrities, including Madonna, Greta Garbo, Rosie O'Donnell, Lenny Kravitz, Santigold,[13] and Sheryl Crow.[6][9] She has been called one of the pioneers of the spiritual movement in the West.[14] In 2008, she published the novel, Never Tango with a Stranger: Love in Peron's Argentina.[15] According to de Herrera, with the help of some friends, she built two hospitals for abused children in Los Angeles.[10]

Image

She was reportedly working on a third autobiography, concerning her role as the U.S. Ambassadress of Fashion in the 1950s when she died[12] on February 28, 2013 at the age of 90.[12]

De Herrera and her son Richard Cooke [Richard Cooke III, "Rik"] were the subject of the Beatles' satirical song "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill".[16]

"The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill" is a song written by John Lennon (credited to Lennon–McCartney), and released by the English rock band the Beatles on their 1968 double album The Beatles (also known as the "White Album")....

This song mocks the actions of a young American named Richard A. Cooke III, known as Rik, who was visiting his mother, Nancy Cooke de Herrera, at the ashram of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in Rishikesh at the same time that the Beatles were staying with the Maharishi. According to his mother, both she and her son maintained friendly relations with all of the Beatles except for Lennon, who by Cooke de Herrera's account was "a genius" but distant and contemptuous of the wealthy American Cooke de Herrera and her clean-cut, college-attending son. According to Nancy's life account, Beyond Gurus, the genesis of the song occurred when she, Rik, and several others, including guides, set out upon elephants to hunt for a tiger (allegedly presented by their Indian guide as a traditional act). The pack of elephants was attacked by a tiger, which was shot by Rik. Rik was initially proud of his quick reaction and posed for a photograph with his prize. However, Rik's reaction to the slaying was mixed, as he has not hunted since. Nancy claims that all present recognised the necessity of Rik's action, but that Lennon's reaction was scornful and sarcastic, asking Rik: "But wouldn't you call that slightly life-destructive?" The song was written by Lennon as mocking what he saw as Rik's bravado and unenlightened attitude.

Lennon later told his version of the story in a Playboy interview, stating that: "'Bungalow Bill' was written about a guy in Maharishi's meditation camp who took a short break to go shoot a few poor tigers, and then came back to commune with God. There used to be a character called Jungle Jim, and I combined him with Buffalo Bill. It's sort of a teenage social-comment song and a bit of a joke." Mia Farrow, who was also at the ashram during the period, supports Lennon's story in her autobiography; she writes, "Then a self-important, middle-aged American woman arrived, moving a mountain of luggage into the brand-new private bungalow next to Maharishi's along with her son, a bland young man named Bill. People fled this newcomer, and no one was sorry when she left the ashram after a short time to go tiger hunting, unaware that their presence had inspired a new Beatles song – 'Bungalow Bill.'"

Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?

Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?

He went out hunting with his elephant and gun
In case of accidents he always took his mom
He's the all-American bullet-headed Saxon mother's son

All the children sing
Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?

Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?

Deep in the jungle where the mighty tiger lies
Bill and his elephants were taken by surprise
So Captain Marvel zapped him right between the eyes

All the children sing
Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?

Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?

The children asked him if to kill was not a sin
"Not when he looked so fierce", his mommy butted in
"If looks could kill, it would have been us instead of him".

All the children sing
Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?

Hey, Bungalow Bill
What did you kill
Bungalow Bill?...


-- The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill, by Wikipedia


Books

• Cooke de Herrera, Nancy (1993) Beyond gurus : a woman of many worlds, Blue Dolphin Pub.[15]
• Cooke de Herrera, Nancy (2003) All you need is love : an eyewitness account of when spirituality spread from the East to the West, Jodere Group [15]
• Cooke de Herrera, Nancy (2008) Never Tango with a Stranger: Love in Peron's Argentina, iUniverse[15]

References

1. California Birth Index, 1905-1995
2. "Meditation teacher Nancy Cooke de Herrera dies". NewsObserver.com. March 4, 2013.[permanent dead link]
3. Los Angeles Times Obituary, 8 Mar 2013
4. All You Need Is Love: An Eyewitness Account of When Spirituality Spread from the East to the West Archived2011-04-06 at the Wayback Machine All Spirit Fitness, book review, 2003.
5. Cae, Herb. (Aug 31, 1961). Los Angeles Times, "Official State Song Slips Disc: Nancy Cooke de Herrera the beautiful blond socialite".
6. Jalonen, Wendy (May–June 2010), "TM believer", Stanford Magazine (Stanford Alumni website), archived from the original on 2012-06-25, retrieved 2011-04-03
7. Cooke de Herrera, Nancy (1993) Blue Dolphin Publishing, Beyond Gurus: A Woman of Many Worlds, pp27-44
8. Cassidy, Maggie July 29, 2011 A Most Unusual Life, Molokai Dispatch
9. Cassidy, Maggie July 29, 2011 A Most Unusual Life, Molakai Dispatch
10. Misra, Neelesh (Dec 1, 1995) U.S. Author Says That India Still Draws Her, India Abroad
11. Unknown author (2005) Writers Directory 2005, Nancy Cooke de Herrera
12. Baida, Aiyana (March 5, 2013). "Celebrity Meditation Teacher". VOXXI. Archived from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved March 26, 2013.
13. Author unknown (April 22, 2012) Santigold NME Music News, retrieved April 30, 2012
14. Author Unknown ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE Archived 2011-04-06 at the Wayback Machine Planet Light Worker web site, Book Review. Retrieved: April 3, 2011
15. Nancy Cooke de Herrera World Cat, retrieved April 30, 2012
16. https://www.quora.com/Who-is-Bungalow-B ... nnington-1

***************************************************

Obituary: Nancy Cooke de Herrera
Nancy Cooke de Herrera April 12, 1922 - February 28, 2013. She was a Piedmont High School alum.
by Analisa Harangozo, Patch Staff
Mar 7, 2013 4:48 pm PT | Updated Mar 7, 2013 9:51 pm PT

Image
by Brett Cooke

Nancy Cooke de Herrera, an inveterate traveler, began her next journey February 28, 2013, with her children present in Beverly Hills to offer a peaceful farewell. She enjoyed a life sufficiently full to require three autobiographies: All You Need Is Love: An Eyewitness Account of When Spirituality Spread from the East to the West, 2003), Never Tango with a Stranger: Love in Peron's Argentina (2008), and Around the World with Nancy Cooke (in preparation).

Born in Oakland, April 12, 1922, the daughter of Edward Irving Veitch and Marie Beatrice Morledge,...

Registered in 1938 by Edward Irving Veitch, 180 Woodland Way, Piedmont, California, as the 44-ton yacht Hermit, homeported at San Francisco, call sign WOWA. Veitch invented the bobby pins in 1935 and got a patent in 1938. Women who bobbed their hair found it difficult to control the shorter strands with conventional hairpins but Veitch's wavy design held them securely in place. They were made by the Vogue Pin Company in Oakland....

Registered in 1935, by Edward Irving Veitch, 180 Woodland Way, Piedmont, California, as the 67-ton yacht Chiro, homeported at San Francisco.

-- World War II U.S. Navy Vessels in Private Hands: The Boats and Ships Sold and Registered for Commercial and Recreational Purposes Under the American Flag, by Greg H. Williams


Nancy attended Piedmont High School with her lookalike sisters, Ardagh Marie Kistler and Doryce Lorillard Hills Wells, then Stanford University.

In 1942 she married Richard Alexander Cooke, Jr., with whom she raised three sons, Richard Alexander Cooke III, Starr Edward Cooke, and Leighton Brett Cooke, while living in Hawaii. They were divorced in 1951.

Subsequently Nancy married Luis Alberto de Herrera and moved to Buenos Aires, where they bore a daughter, Maria Luisa de Herrera. After Luis' untimely death in 1955, she founded a public relations firm in San Francisco.

Selected in 1956 as the US Ambassadress of Fashion, she travelled the major capitals of the world on tours organized by the United States Information Agency. Later, at the invitation of the Kremlin, Nancy led a delegation of San Francisco businesswomen to the USSR. She toured the United States, lecturing on the fashions and cultures of the world.

In 1962, Nancy visited many of the holy men of India, an experience that changed her life. Upon her return to California she married Morton Barrows Jackson...

To Whom It May Concern:

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act. I hereby request the following records:

Documents relating to or mentioning Morton Barrows "Tony" Jackson and his contacts and employment with the Agency, including but not limited to those mentioned in https://ia601504.us.archive.org/18/item ... ackson.pdf This includes previous disclosure of his employment by your Agency.
His death has been widely and extensively reported. http://articles.latimes.com/1991-12-16/ ... on-jackson

I am a member of the news media and request classification as such. I have previously written featured articles on the Agency, and have a long-term contract to write the Encyclopedia of the OSS. http://andmagazine.com/us/1431865273.html

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 20 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Michael Best


Time
Luncheon Guests
1:00 p.m.
3 December 1973
888 16th Street, N.W.

The following will be the luncheon guests today:

Hugh Sidey -- Host and Bureau Chief. Always been cordial, friendly and fair as far as I can figure out. He covered Kennedy in 1960; then was White House correspondent and then began writing a column on the Presidency for Life. When it folded, he took the column to Time. He appears on the Agronsky show and you may have met him when he came out with the Time writers for a briefing.

John Stacks -- He is the Washington News editor. He is the second man in the Washington Bureau; an inside desk man, I would think.

Jess Cook -- He was out here at your ONE backgrounder. We get calls from him now and then.

John Steele -- He was out here for the briefing a year or so ago. He is the magazine's senior correspondent. I gather he does corporation business, e.g., the visit of Japanese industrialists under Time, Inc. sponsorship was his baby.

John Mulliken -- He covers the White House and has been out here for a number of briefings and has been appreciative.

Jerry Hannifin -- He is the one who talked to me about the Vietnam torture story and told me that the conduct of the POW's was a reaffirmation of what kept our nation going at Valley Forge, at Cold Harbor, at Vicksburg. Hannifin is the Time man on the Watergate case, according to a memo you wrote concerning his uncovering of the name of Morton Jackson.

Jerry Schecter -- Diplomatic editor in Washington and a long-time friend of Bill Nelson's. Nelson has pressed him a couple of times on the sourcing of the Khruschev memoirs. Bill knows Jerry from their days in Tokyo….

9. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION INQUIRIES

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has inquired regarding the following additional individuals and activities:

A. William Marihugh

The specific reason for the FBI's interest in Mr. Marihugh was not stated. Mr. Marihugh entered on duty with this Agency on 31 March 1958. He retired under a medical disability as a GS-14 Electronics Engineer on 16 February 1972.

B. Morton Barrows Jackson

Mr. Jackson and Everette Howard Hunt are believed to have been in contact with each other during early 1972. Mr. Jackson listed Mr. Hunt as a Character Reference on his Agency employment application in August 1950.

QUESTION (to Mr. John Warner on 29 November 1972):

Details on Morton Barrows Jackson, who worked about twenty years ago with the Agency.

RESPONSE:

Mr. Morton Barrows Jackson was utilized by the Agency overseas in a covert capacity covering the period from February 1951 to approximately June 1954. He was never a Staff Employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. Although Mr. Jackson is known to have listed Mr. Everette Howard Hunt as a character reference in August 1950, we have no information on the nature or extent of their association. Attached is a memorandum prepared giving full details on the background of Morton Barrows Jackson.

On 19 August 1972 Mr. Jackson called the Agency asking how to respond to possible Grand Jury questions with respect to his connections with the Agency. He was advised to say that there had been an association during the early 1950’s but to try to refer further specific questions to the Agency. On 31 August 1972 he phoned to say he had done so, that no problems had arisen, and that he expressed appreciation.

MORTON BARROWS JACKSON

1. Subject’s name came to the attention of this Agency through the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as a possible contact of Everette Howard Hunt, Jr., on the West Coast during early 1972. (Subject, in August 1950, listed Mr. Hunt as a character reference for covert Agency employment.)

2. Subject was born on 17 July 1921 at Devils Lake, North Dakota. He attended Harvard University from 1938 to 1940 and the University of Southern California from 1946 to 1948. He was admitted to the California Bar in 1949. Subject’s legal experience includes service on the Intergovernmental Committee for European Migration, Geneva, Switzerland, from 1954 to 1957, and as Regional Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, from 1958 to 1959. Subject is a retired lieutenant commander in the U.S. Naval Reserve. He is presently a partner in Jackson, Goodstein, Kumler, Copes, Croskey and Smith, Suite 1651, 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles (Century City), California 90067; telephone: (213) 277-0200. The firm engages in general civil and trial practice in all State and Federal Courts.

3. Subject was a covert asset of this Agency in Bangkok, Thailand, from February 1951 until January 1954, which his contract expired. He was associated then with the Intercontinental Engineering Corporation.

4. In February 1954 Subject was considered for an administrative position with an Agency-sponsored Fund in Switzerland. The International Organizations Division cancelled their interest on 2 June 1954. Subject was, during 1954, an occasional source of the Bern, Switzerland, Station, but no formal relationship existed.


MEMORANDUM FOR THE FILES
FROM: PETE KINSEY
SUBJECT: INTERVIEW OF CHARLES COLSON – JAN. 20, 1975


On January 20, 1975, Senators Weicker and Baker and A.B. Culvahouse and myself met with Charles Colson at the U.S. Courthouse in Washington D.C.

As a preliminary matter, Sen. Weicker read back the notes of the interview which he had had with Colson on January 13, 1975. With certain corrections, Colson confirmed their accuracy. Colson indicated that it was Richard Ober – the CIA liaison man to Kissinger – who received packages from Howard Hunt and passed them on to Richard Helms. Colson stated that the impeachment hearings contain certain information related to a “MR. X” and that there is an affidavit stating that Hunt was bringing Ober packages through May of 1972, which were being passed on to Helms (Bill Gill of ABC News believes that the “MR. X” is, in fact, Ober). Colson indicated that although he did not know for sure, he believed the packages passed to Ober may have contained tapes. Colson bases his speculation on two things. The first relates to an NBC interview with Bernard Barker in April of 1972. Barker described being with Hunt during an interview with an individual in Miami who had been with Castro at the time Robert Kennedy was assassinated. Hunt had a tape recorder and when Barker asked Hunt what the tapes were for, Hunt replied that they were for the CIA (Bill Gill said that Hunt replied “taping for the old company”). The second basis for Colson’s speculation related to the time when Hunt met with David Shapiro while trying to see Colson to pass on a request for money. When Shapiro would not let Hunt see…

[LINES OF TEXT MISSING]

Colson mentioned Morton Jackson again and the fact that Hunt had had breakfast with Jackson the morning of the [Dr. Lewis] Fielding break-in and that the Greenspun capes had been planned in Jackson’s home….

Colson discussed certain private firms either owned by the CIA or used by the CIA. These include:

-- Intertel, a private detective firm in Washington owned by Hughes doing work for the CIA

-- Anderson Security Consultants – CIA propriety

-- Morton Jackson’s Law Firm….

***

Page 3755

Senator BAKER. I have a great respect for Director Helms and if he says it was a brown wig, I believe him.
And you have identification papers; you have camera equipment; you have recording equipment; you have the processing of film; you have the making of prints; you have help in the assembling of the cables; you have your contact with General Cushman; you have Mr. Jackson, Mr. Morton Jackson, a former CIA agent whom you went to as your best friend farthest from Washington. The record is simply studded with that sort of thing.

Now, what I am really reaching for, Mr. Hunt, is a pretty important and crucial question, I judge. That is whether or not the CIA, wittingly or unwittingly, officially or unofficially, was in effect a support agency for your operation and others at the White House.

Do you care to characterize that it was or was not, under those circumstances, a support facility, in effect, for your operations?

Mr. HUNT. Well, under – certainly, the initial circumstances; yes, Senator….

***

Page 87

when he was preparing Mr. Hunt for grand jury testimony probably in April or May.

Mr. BUTLER. April or May 1973. All right. Thank you Mr. Bittman. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Mr. DONOHUE. Mr. Seiberling.

Mr. SEIBERLING. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Bittman, what was the name of the attorney who referred Mr. Hunt to you as a client?

Mr. BITTMAN. Morton Jackson

Mr. SEIBERLING. And he was from Los Angeles?

Mr. BITTMAN. Yes, sir. He’s a personal friend of Mr. Hunt’s, represented him in the capacity as an attorney and as a member of a law firm. I don’t know how big it is out there. I didn’t meet him. I didn’t know him when he called me….


***

EXCERPTS FROM HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1973

Present: Terry Lenzner, assistant chief counsel; Scott Armstrong, investigator; and H. William Shure, assistant minority counsel; Sidney Sachs, counsel for Mr. Hunt.

Mr. ARMSTRONG. Was Mr. Morton Jackson aware of the nature of your business with Mr. Winte in Los Angeles?

Mr. HUNT. No.

Mr. ARMSTRONG. Or the fact that you had business with Hughes Tool Co.?

Mr. HUNT. No. I had no business with Hughes Tool Co.

Mr. ARMSTRONG. Had you projected business with Hughes Tool Co., that is had you hoped to do business with Hughes Tool Co.?

Mr. HUNT. I do not know that I did. I think that is a premise I would object to.

Mr. ARMSTRONG. Well, consulting with the Hughes Tool Co.?

Mr. HUNT. I would again reject that assumption, Mr. Armstrong.

Mr. SHURE. Do you have any relationship with the Hughes Tool Co.?

Mr. HUNT. I had been introduced to Mr. Winte, who is the chief security officer for the Hughes Tool Co. I had some conversation with him.


***

Page 3690

16.3 E. HOWARD HUNT TESTIMONY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1973, 9 SSC 3690


Mr. DASH. Now, did you hear from Mr. Liddy during this period of time?

Mr. HUNT. What period of time?

Mr. DASH. Shortly after, around June 19 or around that time?

Mr. HUNT. Yes, sir, I did.

Mr. DASH. What, if anything, did he tell you?

Mr. HUNT. Toward midday on the 19th, I got a telephone call from him at my Mullen Co. office saying that he needed urgently to meet me. We met at the corner of the USIA building, which I believe is at 17th and Pennsylvania Ave. We met, walked around the block. During the course of the conversation, he told me that it was necessary for me to get out of town, that “they” wanted me to get out of town.

Mr. DASH. Did he indicate who “they” were?

Mr. HUNT. Not at that time.

Mr. DASH. Then, was it a fact that that particular order was rescinded?

Mr. HUNT. He told me that it was.

Mr. DASH. Now, in fact, you did leave Washington, did you not?

Mr. HUNT. I did.

Mr. DASH. And did you ultimately go to California?

Mr. HUNT. I did.

Mr. DASH. At that time, did you make arrangements to obtain Counsel?

Mr. HUNT. I obtained local counsel in California, but not Washington counsel.

Mr. DASH. Well, in California, who did you meet, what California counsel?

Mr. HUNT. I was staying at the home of an attorney, an old friend named Morton B. Jackson. Mr. Liddy appeared out there unannounced on June 21. I reiterated my request to him that he or somebody obtain counsel for me in the Washington area. Mr. Liddy gave me $1,000 and said, this will help with Jackson.

I thereupon gave the $1,000 in cash to Mr. Jackson, retaining him as my counsel on the west coast.

Mr. DASH. And did Mr. Jackson refer you to any Washington lawyer?

Mr. HUNT. In due course, he did.

Mr. DASH. Yes, and what lawyer was that?

Mr. HUNT. He referred me some time later to two attorneys, neither of whom were known to, I believe, either Mr. Jackson or myself. Simply through an alphabetical process, I decided to retain, to inquire of Mr. Bittman whether or not he would be interested in representing me.

Mr. DASH. And did you retain Mr. William Bittman?

Mr. HUNT. I did.

Mr. DASH. And when did you first meet Mr. Bittman in Washington?

Mr. Hunt. On the night of July 3.

Mr. DASH. What was your understanding, Mr. Hunt, concerning legal fees and support of your family that you would receive? What general understanding did you have?

Mr. HUNT. At the time, Mr. Liddy appeared at the home of Mr. Jackson on June 21, I raised the question with him, as I had with…


-- CIA Document, Approved for Release 2004/10/28: CIA-RDP88-01314R0003000180002-2


(whom she divorced in 1975) and moved to Los Angeles, where she was one of the first American students of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's Transcendental Meditation. She introduced TM to much of the Americas.

In 1968 she studied in India's Valley of the Saints and became an independent teacher of meditation. Among her classmates were the Beatles, who immortalized her and her son Rik in "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill." These were the first of 40 trips to India, a country she loved.

Nancy taught TM to the end of her life. Hundreds of students, many notables of film and music, visited her house in Beverly Hills for instruction. Readers were moved by the account of her Indian "spiritual journey in self discovery" (Dominick Dunne).

Nancy was a fully supportive mother; she encouraged her children them to develop unique lifestyles. She provided a home to many friends, who spanned the world; she had an address book for each continent. Long active with the Colleagues, one of Southern California's most prominent charities, Nancy was a major supporter of Molokai's Hui Ho'olana educational center, where a building has been erected in her name.

Nancy is survived by her four children and two sisters, and two brothers-in-law, Herbert Gray Hills, Jr. and Henry Blackmer Kistler, as well as four grandchildren and three great grandchildren, and numerous nieces and nephews. Her ashes will be deposited in Buenos Aires, Molokai, and Piedmont, California.

In lieu of sending flowers, Nancy's family suggests that memorials be made to Hui Ho'olana (PO Box 280, Kualapuu, HI 96757; http://huiho.org/contact.php).

***************************************************

This is the official obituary about Mom, Nancy Cooke de Herrera that will be released to the press. She was such a source of so much support especially in our creating the Hui.The new Peace Pavilion will be dedicated to her.

Nancy Cooke de Herrera, an inveterate traveler, began her next journey February 28, 2013 in Beverly Hills, with her children present to offer a peaceful farewell. She enjoyed a life sufficiently full to require three autobiographies: Beyond Gurus (1993, republished as All You Need Is Love: An Eyewitness Account of When Spirituality Spread from the East to the West, 2003), Never Tango with a Stranger: Love in Peron’s Argentina (2008), and "Around the World with Nancy Cooke" (in preparation). Her friends spanned the world; she had an address book for each continent. All this is evidence of the incredible gift she possessed that enabled her to connect so quickly with so many.

Born in Oakland, April 12, 1922, the daughter of Edward Irving Veitch and Marie Beatrice Morledge, Nancy attended Piedmont High School with her lookalike sisters, Ardagh Marie Kistler and Doryce Lorillard Hills Wells, then Stanford University. In 1942 she married Richard Alexander Cooke, Jr., with whom she raised three sons, Richard Alexander Cooke III, Starr Edward Cooke, and Leighton Brett Cooke, while living in Hawaii. They were divorced in 1951. Subsequently Nancy married Luis Alberto de Herrera and moved to Buenos Aires, where they bore a daughter, Maria Luisa de Herrera. She returned to California in 1955 after Luis’ untimely death and founded a public relations firm in San Francisco with Dorothy McKenzie. elected in 1956 to represent her country as the US Ambassadress of Fashion, she travelled the major capitals of the world on tours organized by the United States Information Agency. She visited the countries bearing gifts, haute couture outfits designed by the leading fashion designers of the day, and staged fashion shows in fifteen hosting countries such as Argentina, England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, and others. In turn, these countries gave her evening gowns or other designer outfits to be presented in a fashion show for a charity fundraiser for UNICEF. Later, at the invitation of the Kremlin, she led a delegation of San Francisco businesswomen to the USSR. She subsequently toured the United States, lecturing on the fashions and cultures of the world.

In 1962, Nancy visited many of the holy men of India, including Lama Anagarika Govinda, Swami Sivananda and the Dalai Lama, an experience that changed her life. Upon her return to California she married Morton Barrows Jackson(whom she divorced in 1975) and moved to Los Angeles, where she became one of the first American students of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s Transcendental Meditation. She introduced Maharishi to much of the United States and to many of the countries of Latin America. In 1968 she studied meditation at Maharishi’s ashram in India’s Valley of the Saints and became a teacher of meditation. Among her classmates were Donovan, Mia Farrow, Mike Love (of the Beach Boys), and the Beatles, who immortalized her son Rik in “The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill.” These were the first of 40 trips to India, a country she greatly loved and whose leaders she knew well.

Although Nancy later took more courses in meditation in Switzerland with Maharishi, she became an independent teacher of TM, a role she pursued to the end of her life. Hundreds of students, many of them notables of film and the music world, visited her house in Beverly Hills to be instructed in this practice. Readers were moved by the account of her Indian “spiritual journey in self discovery” (Dominick Dunne).
Nancy all the while was a fully supportive mother of her four children, encouraging them to develop unique lifestyles. And she provided the same and a home to many friends. It was rare for her to not have a visitor staying in her house. She long was an active member of the Colleagues, one of Southern California’s most prominent charities. A frequent visitor to Molokai, Nancy was a major supporter of the Hui Ho’olana educational center.

Nancy or Nanaji, as she was known to her family, is survived by her four children, a stepson, Miguel Patricio de Herrera, and two sisters, as well as three daughters-in-law, Bronwyn Ann Cooke, Joan Reinau Cooke, and Olga Muller Cooke, and two brothers-in-law, Herbert Gray Hills, Jr. and Henry Blackmer Kistler, and one grandson-in-law, Kelly Nicholas Markgraf. She enjoyed her four grandchildren, Caroline Cooke Cage, Sasha Cooke Markgraf, Sonya Brett Cooke, and Nicholas Starr Cooke and three great grandchildren, Richard Presnall Cage, Campbell Starr Cage, and Evelyn Helena Markgraf. Her ashes will be deposited in Buenos Aires, Molokai, and Piedmont, California.

She will be sorely missed by all her family and friends, who will cherish the many stories she told about her adventures. Her larger than life presence will persist.

In lieu of sending flowers, Nancy’s family suggests that memorials be made to Hui Ho’olana (PO Box 280, Kualapuu, HI 96757; (808) 646-0034; http://huiho.org/contact.php), where a building has been erected in her name.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36188
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

PreviousNext

Return to Articles & Essays

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests