Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenberg

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:55 pm

Actress Sean Young Alleges Harvey Weinstein Exposed Himself to Her
by Rebecca Rubin @rebeccaarubin Rebecca Rubin
October 20, 2017

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
CREDIT: GREGORY PACE/REX/SHUTTERSTOCK

“Blade Runner” star Sean Young has come forward with sexual harassment allegations against Harvey Weinstein. The actress alleges Weinstein exposed himself to her while working on the 1992 film “Love Crimes,” which was produced by Weinstein’s former company, Miramax.

Young recounted the experience on the Dudley and Bob With Matt Show podcast in Austin, Texas. She said on set, she “personally experienced him pulling his you-know-what out of his pants in order to shock me.”

“My basic response was, ‘You know, Harvey, I don’t really think you should be pulling that thing out, it’s not very pretty,'” Young recalled. “And then leaving, and then never having another meeting with that guy again, because it was like, ‘What on earth?'”

She said she got a bad reputation for saying no. “The minute you actually stand up for yourself in Hollywood, you’re the crazy one,” she said.

Young also claimed she was harassed by Warren Beatty and was criticized at the time by Barbra Streisand for speaking out. When she auditioned for “The Mirror Has Two Faces,” she said Streisand told her it was “disgusting” she talked to the press.

“What I had said to the press was that I was harassed. That I was sexually harassed by Warren Beatty. And she told me she thought that was disgusting,” Young said.


Streisand denied Young’s claims in a statement to Variety. “I have no memory of ever having interviewed Sean Young. I do not condone the harassment of women under any circumstance,” she wrote.

Young joins dozens of women who have spoken out recently about sexual harassment or assault involving Weinstein. He is currently under investigation by the LAPD for charges of rape.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Sat Nov 11, 2017 12:07 am

'Stand united': Weinstein accusers join forces to publish list of allegations: Women release Google doc presenting detailed summaries of more than 100 sexual misconduct allegations against producer: ‘There is strength in numbers’
by Sam Levin @SamTLevin
Tuesday 7 November 2017 18.09 EST Last modified on Wednesday 8 November 2017 10.47 EST

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


A group of women who accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual misconduct have published a list of more than 100 allegations of harassment, abuse and rape, launching a campaign to “stand united” against the disgraced movie producer and any efforts to intimidate victims.

The women released a Google Doc with detailed summaries on Tuesday, one day after a New Yorker investigation alleged that Weinstein had deployed an “army of spies” to monitor and silence his accusers. The Hollywood mogul, according to the report, had hired private investigators to aggressively track actors and journalists in a highly sophisticated push to prevent the publication of a litany of sexual harassment and assault allegations.

Image
Zoë Brock. Composite: Getty

“There is strength in numbers,” Zoë Brock, a Weinstein accuser and model, told the Guardian. “I just want to empower all survivors of abuse, men and women, to feel that they are not alone, and to feel that together we can shine a light into the darkness where these predators hide.”

Brock – who accused Weinstein of making an unwanted sexual advance when she was 23 years old – posted the list on Twitter, alongside Asia Argento‏, an Italian actor and director who alleged that the producer assaulted her and has since become one of the most prominent voices as the fallout continues in Hollywood and beyond.

Asia Argento ✔@AsiaArgento
100+ women
assaulted/molested/harassed by #Weinstein. 18 women raped.
This is our updated list #NOSHAMEFIST https://tinyurl.com/ybq3ompo
1:14 PM - Nov 7, 2017
List
List YEAR, AGE, NAME, PLACE, VOCATION, ACTION, STORY, COST( financial), OTHERS INVOLVED, LAWYER, CONTACT 1980, Paula Wachowiak, Buffalo, Employee, HARASSED, Exposed himself to her in 1980. Weinstein...
docs.google.com


“Writing the list was horrifying,” said Samantha Panagrosso, a Paris-based model who has also accused Weinstein of assault. “There are not just all the famous people. There are so many other women and every other day, there are more.”

Panagrosso said in an interview on Tuesday that she had been working on the list for more than two weeks and had collaborated and communicated with Brock and Argento in the process. “Everybody is supporting each other. It’s very daunting … But we are really organized.”

We’re all survivors of Harvey and we’re doing our own investigation
-- Zoë Brock


The Weinstein allegations, first documented in a New York Times investigation last month, has rippled across the entertainment industry, leading to a steady stream of accusations against the producer and other prominent figures, including the director James Toback and the actor Kevin Spacey. The controversies have also inspired women to speak up about sexual misconduct in a number of other sectors, with powerful men losing their jobs in media, broadcasting, the art world, publishing and government.

Weinstein, who was fired from his company and expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, is facing multiple criminal investigations, and the New York City police department has said it is pursuing an arrest warrant in connection with a “credible” rape allegation.

The Google document, promoted with the hashtag #NoShameFist, offers a summary of claims against Weinstein dating back to 1980. Its release comes at a time when survivors of sexual violence are increasingly naming their assailants on social media and crowdsourcing lists of abusers in an effort to warn and protect others. An anonymous “Shitty Media Men” spreadsheet recently made the rounds among female journalists.

Image
Samantha Panagrosso. Photograph: Courtesy Samantha Panagrosso

Some say the tactic of directly publishing claims online can be particularly effective for victims who face significant obstacles reporting to police or through other official channels due to the power and influence of their abusers.

“We’re all survivors of Harvey … and we’re doing our own investigation,” said Brock. “We want to figure out exactly how all these things happened so we can see the patterns.”

Weinstein has apologized for his past behavior, but his representatives have repeatedly said he denies many of the harassment allegations and “unequivocally” denies “allegations of non-consensual sex”.

Panagrosso said the list was not a “witch-hunt”, but part of a larger effort to help shift the mentality that enables predatory behavior. “It’s the start, and I hope the fire keeps burning on the cause.”

She and Argento recently met in Paris and have stayed in contact, Panagrosso said: “We felt like we knew each other … It’s amazing to be part of this movement. It’s like sisterhood.”

Brock, a model and writer from New Zealand, said she had also connected with more than 20 other Weinstein accusers and had discussed ways to “disrupt this culture of abuse and secrecy and coverups and shame”.

Image
Asia Argento. Photograph: Lenny/IPA/Rex/Shutterstock

The recent New Yorker story alleged that Weinstein contracted investigators – including a firm run by former officers of Israeli intelligence agencies – to pose as journalists and activists in an effort to extract information from his accusers and dig up dirt on them.

Weinstein’s spokeswoman dismissed the report, telling the New Yorker: “It is a fiction to suggest that any individuals were targeted or suppressed at any time.”

The producer’s representatives did not respond to a request for comment on Tuesday about the list.

Brock said the revelations about spies made her feel nervous for the first time since she had come forward, but that she was all the more resolved to keep talking and to work with the other women: “It’s better if we now start speaking together, now that we understand exactly how dangerous this is.”

Contact the author: sam.levin@theguardian.com
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Sat Nov 11, 2017 12:09 am

Ex-Israeli PM introduced Harvey Weinstein to former Mossad spies: Ehud Barak admits referring movie mogul to private investigators who reportedly helped to suppress sexual abuse allegations
by Peter Beaumont in Jerusalem and Gwilym Mumford
Wednesday 8 November 2017 08.51 EST First published on Wednesday 8 November 2017 08.51 EST

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


The former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak has said he introduced the disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein to a Tel Aviv-based investigations firm made up of former spies reportedly hired by the producer to suppress sexual abuse allegations against him.

Weinstein allegedly hired an “army of spies” in an attempt to stop accusers from going public with sexual misconduct claims against him, according to a report in the New Yorker this week.

The magazine claims that among the private security agencies hired by Weinstein, starting from around autumn 2016, was Black Cube, which is largely run by former officers of Israeli intelligence agencies, including Mossad.

Over a year ago, Barak was asked by Harvey Weinstein if he knew an Israeli company he had heard of, that was capable of helping him with business issues he had. Barak confirmed to [Weinstein] the company he heard of was likely Black Cube,” a spokesperson for Barak said in a statement.

This Letter of Engagement supersedes all prior agreements, written or otherwise, between the parties (including, in particular, the Letter of Engagement, dated October 24, 2014, between Black Cube and the Firm, acting on behalf of the Client (hereinafter “the Original LoE”) and the Client, whether written, oral or otherwise) and Black Cube acknowledges and agrees that it is not and will not be entitled to any fees (whether success fees or otherwise, whether pursuant paragraphs 16 through 18 of the Original LoE or otherwise) or costs under the Original LoE.

-- Harvey Weinstein’s Army of Spies: The film executive hired private investigators, including ex-Mossad agents, to track actresses and journalists, by Ronan Farrow


“Barak is not personally familiar with the firm or its executives but gave Weinstein its contact information. Barak was not aware until this morning of the fact the company was hired by Weinstein, or for what purposes or operations,” the statement added.

The New Yorker alleges that two Black Cube investigators met the actor Rose McGowan, who later publicly accused Weinstein of rape, to obtain information.

Weinstein “unequivocally denies” all claims of non-consensual sex, a spokesperson for the producer said.

Black Cube has not replied to a Guardian request for comment, but it told Israeli media outlets that it did not discuss its clients, and said its work was legal.

On its website, Black Cube describes itself as a “select group of veterans from the Israeli elite intelligence units that specializes in tailored solutions to complex business and litigation challenges”.

Barak’s statement coincides with dates in the New Yorker article which claims that Weinstein approached Black Cube in autumn 2016, to seek their assistance in silencing the emerging sexual abuse allegations against him.

This Letter of Engagement supersedes all prior agreements, written or otherwise, between the parties (including, in particular, the Letter of Engagement, dated October 24, 2014, between Black Cube and the Firm, acting on behalf of the Client (hereinafter “the Original LoE”) and the Client, whether written, oral or otherwise) and Black Cube acknowledges and agrees that it is not and will not be entitled to any fees (whether success fees or otherwise, whether pursuant paragraphs 16 through 18 of the Original LoE or otherwise) or costs under the Original LoE.

-- Harvey Weinstein’s Army of Spies: The film executive hired private investigators, including ex-Mossad agents, to track actresses and journalists, by Ronan Farrow


The magazine claims investigators secretly recorded at least four meetings with McGowan while pretending to be a women’s rights advocate, citing dozens of pages of documents and seven people directly involved in Weinstein’s efforts.

The investigator reportedly used a different fake identity to meet a New York magazine journalist who was investigating allegations made against Weinstein.

She also allegedly attempted to broker a meeting with Ronan Farrow, the New Yorker journalist who reported 13 claims of abuse made against Weinstein last month, and also wrote the 6 November investigation into Weinstein’s links with Black Cube.

During the year that Black Cube reportedly worked for Weinstein, agents allegedly collected information on dozens of people, compiling psychological profiles with their personal or sexual histories in order to contradict, discredit or intimidate his accusers.

The New Yorker reports that Weinstein sought the assistance of ex-employees from his movie enterprises to help collect names and place calls. Investigations also allegedly sometimes went through Weinstein’s lawyers. Among them, the New Yorker claims, was David Boies, who represented Al Gore in his 2000 presidential election dispute with George W Bush.

The New Yorker claims Boies signed a contract demanding that Black Cube seek to uncover information to stop the publication of a New York Times story about Weinstein’s sexual abuse when his firm was also representing the Times in a libel case. Boies told the magazine “it was a mistake” to have been involved with the investigators.

Weinstein’s spokeswoman Sallie Hofmeister has dismissed the New Yorker report, saying: “It is a fiction to suggest that any individuals were targeted or suppressed at any time.”

Neither Hofmeister nor Boies immediately responded to requests for comment.

After the publication of the New Yorker report, McGowan praised Farrow for his investigation, tweeting: “Ronan Farrow your words will line the halls of justice.”

Meanwhile, another person alleged to have been spied on, the actor Asia Argento, described the revelations as terrifying, writing on Twitter:

Asia Argento ✔@AsiaArgento
Why didn't I, @rosemcgowan, @RoArquette @AnnabellSciorra spoke up earlier? We were followed by ex-Mossad agents. Isn't that terrifying? Very https://twitter.com/newyorker/status/927721031946686464
2:49 AM - Nov 7, 2017


Police in London, Los Angeles and New York have launched investigations into the alleged behaviour by Weinstein, who has been accused of sexual assault and harassment by more than 90 women.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:30 am

Child abuse documentary Hollywood 'didn't want you to see' goes viral: The film An Open Secret died upon release in 2015, but is seeing a renewed interest online amid a cascade of allegations against Hollywood’s elite
Rory Carroll in Los Angeles, @rorycarroll72
1 November 2017 08.59 EDT Last modified on 1 November 2017 14.35 EDT

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
Amy Berg, director of An Open Secret, talks to Evan Henzi. Photograph: Handout

When the documentary An Open Secret tried to lift the lid on child abuse in Hollywood, it billed itself as “the film Hollywood doesn’t want you to see”. The marketing tagline did not exaggerate.

The film died upon release in 2015. There was no theatrical release to speak of, no television deal, no video-on-demand distribution.

“We got zero Hollywood offers to distribute the film. Not even one. Literally no offers for any price whatsoever,” said Gabe Hoffman, a Florida-based hedge fund manager who financed the film.

It did not seem to matter that it was directed by an Oscar-nominated director, Amy Berg, or that it uncovered damning evidence of the sexual abuse of teenage boys by figures in the film industry.

“There was nowhere to see it,” said Lorien Haynes, the film’s writer. “I don’t think it impacted at all. Nobody saw it. We released a film that didn’t [seem to] exist.”


Now, two years later, multiple “open secrets” of predatory behaviour are detonating across Hollywood and the documentary that blew the whistle is getting millions of viewers -– but still no distribution deal.

Hoffman released the film for free on the video-sharing website Vimeo this month after reports about Harvey Weinstein’s alleged sexual assaults set off a chain-reaction, with James Toback, Tyler Grasham and Kevin Spacey among those accused of harassment and worse.

Corey Feldman, a former child actor who says he was the victim of a paedophile ring, has raised more than $170,000 through crowdfunding for a purported $10m biopic about the abuse.

Hoffman said he had intended to end the free online viewings of An Open Secret on Tuesday, but extended the window until Sunday because of public interest, with more than 3 million viewings on various social media platforms since 12 October.


“We knew a Harvey Weinstein moment was coming and when it would, that we’d release it for free,” said Hoffman. He hoped the documentary would yet make its way on to television. “We’d love to be on Amazon and Netflix. We’re always ready to talk.”

The documentary’s initial vanishing into the void and belated re-emergence underlines how Hollywood long ducked evidence of abuse. An Open Secret had the elements to make a splash.

Berg, the director, had earned an Oscar nomination for her film Deliver Us from Evil, about sex abuse in the Catholic church.

Her team obtained evidence of a paedophile ring in Hollywood -– managers, agents, publicists and directors -– that preyed on young boys and teenagers seeking entry to the industry.


Some hosted lavish parties where men allegedly plied the boys with alcohol and drugs and traded them for sex. Others spent years grooming victims, and winning the confidence of their families, before starting sexual assaults.

A handful were caught and served relatively brief jail sentences before returning to the industry. Brian Peck, an actor and acting coach who worked for Nickelodeon and the X-Men franchise, was convicted of two counts of lewd acts with a child. He is now working in the industry again.

The documentary features interviews with Evan Henzi, who was 11 years old when his manager, Martin Weiss, started assaulting him. Weiss pleaded no contest in 2012 to two counts of child molestation, and was sentenced to a year in jail and five years’ probation. He was freed immediately due to time served.

“I shared my story in An Open Secret so other victims who have been molested for years just like me can heal,” Henzi, 24, said this week.

“When the film was released, I witnessed a lot of support by people who actually saw the film. What I did not witness was support from film festivals or Hollywood at large to promote the film. I do believe, though, that both some of the film-makers of An Open Secret and the Hollywood establishment are responsible for this.”


Internal disputes disrupted the film’s launch. Hoffman took Berg to arbitration, alleging she did not fulfill her end of the deal. She denied that. There were other rows behind the scenes over the script, crediting and edits.

Berg declined to be interviewed, saying she would let the film speak for itself.

Hoffman downplayed any suggestion that the film-makers had shot themselves in the foot and blamed Hollywood for its distribution travails -– for instance initially rating the film R, before relenting and classifying it PG-13. “Hollywood clearly blocked the film. The higher-ups didn’t like how it portrayed the industry.”

Hoffman also claimed festivals in Los Angeles, London and Toronto promised to give the well-reviewed film prominent screenings, only to rescind the invitations without proper explanation. The Guardian could not immediately verify this account.

Haynes, who wrote the script, said mid-ranking television executives seemed eager to buy the film, only to be overruled. “At the top of the food chain is where we got the ‘no’. It did feel that people were scared to run it. It is complete anathema to release a film about corruption in Hollywood in Hollywood.”

She acknowledged another factor: a harrowing film about child abuse was a tough sell. “You’re expecting a lot of an audience to sit through that.”

For two years An Open Secret existed in film purgatory, available only in pirated online versions, few people aware that here was evidence of abuse, collusion and cover-up in the heart of Tinseltown.

Weinstein does not feature in the documentary –- he allegedly preferred women, not young boys -– but the accusations against him unleashed a gale which put An Open Secret in the headlines as a “must watch” documentary that explains Hollywood’s complicity.

Weinstein has apologized for his past behavior, but denies many of the harassment claims and “unequivocally denied” allegations of non-consensual sex.

Spacey apologized this week after he was accused of making an unwanted sexual advance toward the Star Trek actor Anthony Rapp, who says he was 14 years old at the time of the alleged incident in 1986. Spacey, star of the Netflix show House of Cards and former artistic director of London’s Old Vic, said he did not remember the “encounter” but if he had done what Rapp described in an article published by BuzzFeed, it “would have been deeply inappropriate drunken behavior”.

Meanwhile, Toback, a veteran director, faces allegations from more than 30 women of sexual harassment and trying to trade roles for sex. He has denied the accusations, saying he hired people only on merit. Grasham, a veteran agent, is accused of harassing and assaulting multiple young men. His employer, the Agency for the Performing Arts, fired him after the claims went public. One alleged victim has filed a complaint with the Los Angeles police department. Grasham has not addressed the claims in any public statement yet and could not be reached for comment.

The cascade of allegations have all served to give Open Secret the kind of limelight its backers believe it deserved in the first place.

“The dangers and threats that follow speaking out are very real. I’ve seen them first-hand. But I believe we’ve turned a corner,” said Katelyn Howes, one of the producers. “I hope this continues to push these abuses of power into the spotlight, making it safer for so many people, especially children, who aren’t in the position to talk about their experiences yet.”

Henzi, the former child actor who shared his story of abuse, echoed that. “I do believe that the allegations against Harvey Weinstein have completely opened up the door to having a grand conversation about different experiences of sexual assault by people in the entertainment industry, and that will be really beneficial for a lot of people. It is about time.”

If you have information about sexual misconduct in Hollywood, please contact rory.carroll@theguardian.com
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Sat Nov 11, 2017 10:21 pm

Harvey Weinstein Urges Jews to Take on Anti-Semites: "Kick These Guys in the Ass"
by Scott Feinberg, Tina Daunt
March 24, 2015 11:49pm

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


"We're gonna have to get as organized as the mafia," the mogul told the audience at the Simon Wiesenthal Center's national tribute dinner, where he was introduced by friend and competitor Jeffrey Katzenberg as "a really nice Jewish boy."


"We're gonna have to get as organized as the mafia," the mogul told the audience at the Simon Wiesenthal Center's national tribute dinner, where he was introduced by friend and competitor Jeffrey Katzenberg as "a really nice Jewish boy."

"We better stand up and kick these guys in the ass," movie mogul Harvey Weinstein said about present-day anti-Semites as he accepted the Humanitarian Award at the Simon Wiesenthal Center's National Tribute Dinner on Tuesday night at the Beverly Hilton. "We're gonna have to get as organized as the mafia," he continued. "We just can't take it anymore [from] these crazy bastards."

At the conclusion of a ceremony that celebrated four Jewish and gentile heroes (several posthumously), and at which more than a dozen Holocaust survivors were asked to stand and be applauded, Weinstein was introduced by his longtime friend and competitor Jeffrey Katzenberg — the event's master of ceremonies — and Christoph Waltz. The actor has twice won the best supporting actor Oscar for roles in Weinstein films, the first time for portraying a Nazi in Inglourious Basterds. Weinstein said to hearty applause, "Too bad movies can't all be like Inglourious Basterds, where Hitler gets what he deserves."

Weinstein, 63, then went off-script to speak about his father, who was a sergeant stationed in Cairo during World War II. The elder [Max (1924–1976), a diamond cutter] Weinstein aided the Haganah (the precursor to the IDF before Israel was a state) and later taught his sons about anti-Semitism. Weinstein emphasized his concern about anti-Semitism around the world, which Wiesenthal Center studies indicate is at its highest levels since the end of World War II.

It will be recalled that after Black Sabbath (Saturday), Menahem Begin received a letter from Moshe Sneh (chief of the Haganah General Headquarters) with instructions to blow up the King David. After preparatory work and several postponements, Irgun fighters gathered at 7 am. on Monday, July 22, 1946 at the Bet Aharon Talmud Torah seminary in Jerusalem....

The Haganah focused its efforts on bringing in illegal immigrants, and in order to appease those activists in the Haganah ranks who continued to favor armed struggle, it sanctioned the sabotaging of British naval vessels which were hunting down illegal immigrants. Thus, on August 18, 1946, Palmach fighters sabotaged the Empire Haywood and two days later damaged the Empire Rival, the two ships used for deporting immigrants from Haifa to Cyprus.

-- The Bombing of the King David Hotel, by etzel.org


"I'm upset when I read The Atlantic Monthly's headline that says, 'Should the Jews leave Europe?' — a resounding 'no' on my end — and [New York Times columnist] David Brooks today talking about how to combat anti-Semitism," Weinstein said. "It's like, here we go again, we're right back where we were [before the Holocaust]. And the lessons of the past are we better stand up and kick these guys in the ass."

The co-head of The Weinstein Company continued, "I think it's time that we, as Jews, get together with the Muslims who are honorable and peaceful — but we [also] have to go and protect ourselves. We have to build, once again, back into the breach. There's a quote from Kurt Vonnegut's book The Sirens of Titan and it always was the motto of Miramax and now The Weinstein Company. It says, 'Good can triumph over evil if the angels are as organized as the mafia.' That's how we built our company! And, unfortunately, we [Jews] are gonna have to get as organized as the mafia. We just can't take it anymore. We just can't take these things. There's gotta be a way to fight back."




It was sometime in 1963. I was seven and my brother was nine. My father called us to him, saying he had something “important” to discuss with us. Our minds began racing to figure out what our infraction had been to get the butt-whipping we were sure was coming. But that wasn’t what Max had in mind. He walked us into the living room and told us to take a seat in the two “club chairs.” Now we really knew something was up, because in our whole lives we had never, never been allowed to sit in these chairs or even look as if the thought of sitting in them might have crossed our mind. The expensive chairs were for “company only” and that was that. So we figured we were dead for sure. We obediently sat in our assigned seats and waited to hear what we had done. But what followed was the only “sit-down” speech my father ever made to me and my brother in our lives.

“I want you both to listen. I have something very important to tell you.”

He proceeded to recount the story of the Kennedy family: how John Kennedy was the president and had picked his brother Bobby to be the attorney general and how their old man, Joe Kennedy, had helped organize the entire election campaign. Joe and his two sons were a lesson in how important family was—if a family worked together, they could accomplish anything. He went on to say that John and Bobby Kennedy were the perfect example of how powerful that bond of family could be and that John had picked Bobby because he knew he could trust him like no other. Then came Max’s greatest leap, a leap that only a dreamer with an innocent purity of belief in the power of his dream could make.

“And you guys can accomplish as much as them. If you stick together, nothing is impossible.”

There it was in one sentence—the prime directive. The secret ingredient had been stirred in. He went on to say that even if someday we ended up not working together we should always look out for each other, no matter what. But the implication remained. Together was better. And with this knowledge imparted, we were dismissed.

***

Image
-- Frank Sinatra, center, with Harvey Weinstein, right, and Weinstein business partner Corky in Buffalo on Oct. 4, 1974. Photo by Mickey Osterreicher.


Max had lived to see Harvey achieve a high level of success as a concert promoter in Buffalo, where he put on all kinds of shows, from Frank Sinatra and Bette Midler to the Grateful Dead. And my father had gone to listen to and meet them all, even the Dead.

-- All Thanks to Max, by Bob Weinstein


Giancana had longtime ties to the Kennedy clan, going back to JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy, who was involved with Giancana in the bootlegging business during Prohibition. Additionally, Gianciana was an associate of singer Frank Sinatra, a close Kennedy friend, and allegedly was a donor to JFK's 1960 Presidential campaign, at a time when politicians weren't required to disclose their deep-pockets contributors.

There also have been allegations that Giancana secretly helped JFK win the 1960 West Virginia primary, in which he bested fellow U.S. Sen. Hubert Humphrey, D-Minn. In 2009, Tina Sinatra, daughter of Kennedy friend Frank Sinatra, told the TV program "60 Minutes" that the legendary singer—at the behest of JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy—approached Giancana. Sinatra allegedly asked Giancana to use mob muscle to pressure local union members to vote for JFK. The request was made through an intermediate, Sinatra, because "it would be in Jack Kennedy's best interest if his father did not make the contact directly," Tina Sinatra explained.

In his 1997 book, The Dark Side of Camelot, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh alleged that the elder Kennedy eventually did meet with Giancana in Chicago, to solicit his support for JFK in the general election.

During the Kennedy Administration, the Chicago mobster, along with other crime figures, is known to have been enlisted by the CIA to plot the killing of Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

Giancana and Kennedy also shared a mistress, Judith Campbell Exner, with whom they were involved with at different times (Kennedy first, then the mob boss). In a 1988 People magazine article, Exner claimed that she arranged a meeting between then-Presidential candidate Kennedy and Giancana at the Fontainbleau Hotel in Miami in April 1960 at JFK's request. "I think I may need his help in the campaign," she claimed that Kennedy told her. Subsequently, Exner claimed, she arranged nine other meetings in 1960 and 1961, and personally witnessed at least one of the sit-downs. In addition, Exner later claimed that she carried mysterious envelopes between Kennedy and Giancana.

-- Was Kennedy Tied to the Mob?: Rigged Elections, Shared Mistresses, And An Assassination Plot, by Patrick J. Kiger


"While we must be understanding of our Arab brothers and our Islamic brothers," he added, "we also have to understand that these crazy bastards [Arab and Islamic extremists] are also killing their own — they're killing neighbors, they're killing people from all sorts of different races. And, unlike World War II, when we didn't act right away and we paid the price, we better start acting now. Trust me, I'm the last guy who wants to do anything about it, but I realize if we don't, we will perish. We can't allow the bad guys to win. So, as they say in The Godfather, 'back to the mattresses,' and back to the idea that we will not ever forget what happened to us."

Earlier in the evening, Weinstein was described as "a larger-than-life personality" but also "a really nice Jewish boy" by Katzenberg. The emcee pointed out that Weinstein and his brother, Bob, named their first company, Miramax, after their parents, Miriam and Max, asking — to laughter and applause — "In all the thousands of years and annals of dutiful, nice Jewish boys, how many of them named their company after their parents? C'mon, this is like the ultimate mitzvah!" He also described Weinstein as having "an outsized personality" and "an outsized heart," and also being "an extraordinary and dedicated philanthropist."

Waltz handled the actual presentation of Weinstein's award. Calling Weinstein a man with "a heart of gold," Waltz pointed out that the honoree has handled the distribution of a great number of films connected to Jews, Nazis and/or the Holocaust — not just Basterds, but also The Truce, Life Is Beautiful, The Reader, Sarah's Key, Captain Corelli's Mandolin, The Imitation Game and the upcoming Woman in Gold. (He then introduced a clip from Woman in Gold — a film about an elderly Jewish woman seeking the return of artwork stolen from her family by Nazis — which opens next week.) He closed, "Harvey's words, philanthropy and brilliant films inspire all to strive toward righteousness without shielding our eyes from the past."

NBCUniversal vice chairman Ron Meyer, Larry A. Mizel, Rabbi Meyer May and Rabbi Marvin Hier (SWC's dean and founder, as well as a two-time Oscar-winning documentarian and the only rabbi among the Academy's 6,000-plus members) helped to confer the award — a menorah-like statuette — upon Weinstein. Other notables in attendance included Vivi Nevo, Michael Milken and Michael Chow.

This year's gathering took on a particular somber tone in the wake of the ongoing unrest in the Middle East.

“As many of you know, it’s been my privilege to be a part of these dinners for some 15 years,” Katzenberg told the crowd. “Throughout the time, the need for the work of the center has always been great. But I believe that, right now today, the need is greater than ever. Intolerance seems to be spreading like an incredibly dangerous virus — a virus that far too often is lethal.” He listed a “sampling of events” over the past year — rockets fired randomly on towns and schools in Israel, the murder of 21 Christian Egyptians in Libya and the “gruesome spectacle of beheadings by terrorists afraid to show their faces but proud to post videos of every horrific detail on the Internet.”

“Hate can wreck sudden destruction with the blast of bomb or the trigger of a gun,” Katzenberg said.

Tuesday’s gala featured the surprise announcement that an additional $50 million has been raised toward construction of a sprawling Museum of Tolerance complex in Jerusalem. Katzenberg announced the new donation, which he said had come together “over the last few months” and gives the center 87 percent of the new campus’ projected cost.

Katzenberg said the $50 million includes “a gift of $26 million — the largest gift in the history of the Simon Wiesenthal Center — from Dawn Arnall to name the building in memory of her late husband, Roland,” the billionaire businessman and former U.S. Ambassador to the Netherlands. The other bequests include “a gift of $10 million from the world-renowned philanthropist and chairman of the Milken Institute, along with his wife, Michael and Lori Milken... and a gift of $10 million from Larry and Carol Mizel to jointly name the Museum of Tolerance Jerusalem campus. A gift of $18 million [came] from one of Canada’s most generous families, Gordon and Leslie Diamond, to name the 1,000-seat amphitheater.” There also was an anonymous $5 million gift.

The planned Museum of Tolerance in Jerusalem will tackle pressing issues like the rise of global anti-Semitism, the promotion of human dignity for people of all faiths and the necessity of opposing extremism and hate, no matter where it is directed. The 94,000 square-foot site will house a 149,000 square-foot building, including two experiential museums, one for adults and one for children; a state-of-the-art International Conference Center; a “Grand Hall,” Education Center and Theater for the Performing Arts. The building will be surrounded by the Tikkun Olam Garden of approximately 24,000 square feet as well as a 1,000-seat Amphitheater of approximately 11,765 square feet.

As is traditional at these events, Simon Wiesenthal Center Medals of Valor were presented to an international cadre of individuals who have heroically defended tolerance and human rights. One of this year’s recipients was Lassan Bathily, a Muslim immigrant from Mali, who courageously hid Jewish shoppers at a kosher market in Paris during a tense hostage crisis with a terrorist. Another was Kevin Vickers, who as Sergeant-at-Arms of the Canadian House of Commons in Ottawa, shot and killed a terrorist gunman, saving the lives of many of his colleagues. (He is now his country’s ambassador to Ireland.)

Zidan Seif, a policeman from Israel’s Druze minority, was honored for sacrificing his life to protect a West Jerusalem synagogue from two Palestinian terrorists. Eduard Schulte, a prominent German industrialist and secret anti-Nazi, was singled out for risking his life to cross the border into Switzerland to warn the West that the Nazi regime intended to kill all of Europe’s Jews.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center is one of the largest international Jewish human rights organizations with more than 400,000 member families in the United States. Its Museum of Tolerance on Pico Blvd. hosts more than 350,000 people annually, including 130,000 students. Its “Tools for Tolerance” programs have been the recipients of many awards, including the United Nations Peace and Tolerance Award. The museum also is a member of the International Coalition of Sites of Conscience and part of their Immigration and Civil Rights Network Southwest Region Immigration Training Project.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:33 am

All Thanks to Max
by Bob Weinstein
Vanity Fair
April, 2003

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Plenty of ink has been devoted to the rise of Miramax Films, the personalities of the two brothers who run it, and the company’s extraordinary run of Academy Award nominations. Now, in a deeply personal reflection, Bob Weinstein reveals the key to his and Harvey’s success: their father, Max, a diamond cutter whose dreams and passion for the movies turned two young boys from Queens into Hollywood’s most formidable team.

In 1979 my brother, Harvey, and I founded Miramax Films, the company that we named in honor of our parents, Miriam and Max, and that we continue to run to this day. Harvey is the public face of Miramax, a role born out of the necessity to win recognition for the “art house” films we began our careers by distributing—films of high quality, but most of them sorely lacking in bankable stars. Harvey tapped into his inner showman and became the voice these small jewels needed to win the recognition they deserved.

My style is more low-key. Outside of the movie business I tend to be known as the “quiet brother,” which is fine by me. We have different means of working toward the same end, which have proved successful for 25 years. It actually works out for the best that only one of us likes the spotlight. There wouldn’t physically be enough room in it for both.

For the first 18 years, we pretty much worked on everything together. We had to agree on the buying of a film, otherwise it wasn’t bought. We then collaborated on the marketing, the distribution, and the thousands of other details that go into creating and running a movie company.

Over the last seven years, as the company has grown from 30 employees to more than 400, our roles have altered considerably. My brother and I now choose and market our own films separately, Harvey under the Miramax banner, which has accumulated 176 Academy Award nominations, including a best-picture nomination an unprecedented 11 years in a row, as well as two winners, The English Patient and Shakespeare in Love. I created the Dimension banner, under which I produce the company’s more mainstream, commercial movies, such as the Spy Kids films, Scary Movie 1 and 2, The Others, and the Scream trilogy. Despite our different focuses, not a day goes by that we don’t speak to each other at least five times, to offer suggestions, ask advice, deal with business matters, and generally watch each other’s back. We remain partners in every way.

I offer the above as a brief overview of the company that has been our life’s work. When you are running a company, time for reflection is a luxury you can’t (or don’t) usually afford yourself, but on this past Father’s Day my thoughts traveled back to our dad. Although he had died 26 years earlier and never lived to see a single film that Miramax produced, his influence extends far beyond merely lending his name to the company. His passions in life, from his love of movies and business to his belief in the importance of family, have infused our own personal and professional lives. Max Weinstein was more responsible than anyone else for the creation and success of Miramax Films, and I feel compelled to give him the credit he deserves and tell his story.

My father was born in 1924 on the Lower East Side of New York City. He served in World War II and upon his return met my mother at a dance; the rest, just barely, became history. Spotting the beautiful 19-year-old Miriam Postal from across the room, he swiftly moved in and asked her to dance. She just as swiftly turned him down. As he walked dejectedly away, she took pity and called him back over. Whew! Whatever it was he lacked in first impressions he must have subsequently made up for, and they were married soon after. They moved to Queens, and my brother was born in 1952; I came along in 1954. We grew up in a small two-bedroom apartment in a lower-middle-class housing development called Elechester. Harvey and I shared a bedroom until he left for college, but luckily we didn’t spend much time inside. We had a stoop where all the kids from our building, and those nearby, would congregate. There was always some kind of game going on, and we spent every minute we could taking part.



The Movies

In the 60s and 70s every Saturday was Mom’s “beauty-parlor day,” a ritual that had to be observed by her and a thousand like her—six hours to get their hair “done,” i.e., washed, cut, teased, God forbid colored, and then heat-fused to a helmet-like condition under the huge old-style dryers, all in the quest for the perfect hairdo.

Upon returning, week after week, year after year, my mom would ask the same question:

“Max, what do you think?”

And, on cue, whether he liked it or not, whether he even looked or not, his response was unfailingly the same:

“Great.”

One memorable Saturday, my mom came home sobbing, with a truly laughable and horrible new hairstyle that she had been “talked into.” The inevitable question came. The inevitable answer was given. Only after hours of my mom begging and pleading through teary eyes for him to stop lying and tell her the truth did Max finally relent this once and reply:

“Yeah, they really killed you.”

The sound of horror that emanated from my mother will be remembered forever by those who heard it. Of course, Max was ordered to seek retribution: “Have the hairstylist fired and sue the beauty parlor for everything they’ve got!” Max and his sons learned a valuable lesson that day. No matter what, the hair always looks great.

On these Saturdays, it was Max’s responsibility to “do something with the boys.” His interpretation of that was to take us to the movies, and not a few Saturdays now and then, but every Saturday. Max loved movies, all kinds—adventures, comedies, thrillers, foreign films, love stories, Westerns. I think that through these stories he was transported to a place where his own beliefs, among them that the impossible was possible, were nurtured. I can remember sitting with my father and brother and watching Alec Guinness blow up the bridge on the River Kwai. We sat through Sink the Bismarck, were dazzled by the greatest array of stars ever assembled in The Longest Day, cheered along with the rest of the audience as Jimmy Brown ran for daylight only to be shot at the last second in The Dirty Dozen. For my brother and me, there would be no *Field of Dreams–*like playing catch, no nature lessons with our old man. Instead, it would be a darkened theater, the projector light coming on and a new adventure unfolding. We weren’t complaining. And for Max it was killing two birds with one stone: he had to do something with us, and he was able to do something he loved and pass that love on to his sons. Everyone came out ahead.

One Saturday, Miriam decided things needed to change.

“Max, why don’t you do something different with them? They’re not getting any fresh air! No sunlight!”

My mom’s persistence always yielded some result and Max was left with no choice but to give in.

So, off to the beauty parlor my mom went, leaving Max to break the news: no movie today. What?! What else was there? But there would be no debate. My father was firm when he had to be, and direct orders from Miriam meant he had to be. And he had already come up with a plan.

“Boys, we’re going fishing.”

Silence is not something the Weinstein brothers will ever be remembered for, but on this day it was the only response we could come up with. Had our father gone insane?

Off we went to Wainwright’s, the local all-purpose department store. In the record time of 30 minutes, our father bought three rods, reels, hooks, flies, sinkers—everything and more that was or might be instrumental in catching a fish.

Fifteen minutes later, we were in Flushing Meadows Park at the man-made lake left over from the 1964 World’s Fair. We set up our new stuff alongside several actual fishermen, put our lines in the water, and waited. And waited. Thirty minutes went by and nothing. We were still hopeful. Forty-five minutes passed. Had we ever possessed anything resembling patience, it would have been wearing thin. Since we had never been supplied with any, we just felt acute anxiety. One hour now, and nothing.

Max finally turned to the fisherman nearest him.

“How’s it going?”

“Good.”

“Catch anything yet?”

“Not yet.”

“How long have you been here?”

“Oh, about four hours.”

Max gave the orders:

“That’s it, we’re outta here!”

The rods, reels, sinkers, flies, etc., were left on the ground, abandoned without guilt. The grand experiment was over. Thirty minutes later, the lights went down, the projector came on, an adventure began to unfold, and order was returned to our universe.

Most of our moviegoing consisted of the types of films I mentioned earlier—action adventures, war epics, musicals … basically whatever the local movie house was playing that week. We loved them all. But on one occasion Harvey started pressing to go to a foreign film. Being 15 and having been to a few on his own already, he argued that it was educational and cultural and a bunch of other things that made me think my brother had lost his mind. I was 13 and I didn’t want to read my movie! Before I could protest too much and ruin the plan, he took me aside and explained: The name of the film was I Am Curious, Yellow, a specially imported Swedish “art” film. We needed our father in order to get in because it was rated X, the first film containing scenes of full-frontal nudity ever to be played in regular movie houses. Suddenly foreign didn’t sound like such a bad idea.

Image
I Am Curious, Yellow


Miriam disagreed, citing a lack of convincing evidence of any “art,” foreign film or not. Max won the day for us by agreeing to chaperon and supervise should anything be inappropriate. So off we went. Max fell asleep a half-hour into it. I know that Harvey has been quoted in many articles as saying The 400 Blows was one of his favorite foreign-language movies ever, but I can tell you what mine was at that moment in time—I was 13, after all! There was no chance of my falling asleep. But Harvey was just enough older to watch the movie and notice something else: a packed audience of “art-lovers” who never would have set foot in a movie with subtitles but for the fact there was a little something extra added. It was a lesson that would come into play years later.

The Window

My father was a diamond cutter in New York City’s Diamond District, located on 47th Street between Fifth and Sixth Avenues. For those in the business it was simply known as “the Street.” As New Yorkers and tourists pass by the vast rows of displays, filled with tens of thousands of diamonds in as many cuts and configurations, most rarely notice the floors above these shining windows. In some Jewish-American inversion of class structure, the workers are upstairs on the Street and the owners are down. Each building has hundreds of upper-floor shops where workers and tradesmen put in 10- to 12-hour days transforming raw, unpolished hunks of stone, which would seem like junk to a layman, into polished diamond gems with 56 facets to be sold in the windows and stores below.

In Max’s day, each of the workshops was approximately 800 square feet in size, housing up to eight cutters. Every cutter was provided a stool and a workbench outfitted with a steel wheel lying flush in the center, like a record turntable. When the cutter flipped the electric switch on the side of the bench, this wheel would begin spinning, eventually reaching speeds around 1,800 rotations per minute. The cutter would place the raw gem, dull and grayish, into a lapidary tool called a dop. He would then begin pressing it to the wheel, systematically turning the dop to create the facets that bring out the luster of the stone, and transform it into everyone’s idea of a diamond, white and shining. The work was intense and monotonous, not to mention hard on the back.

It was in these shops that my father spent most of his life, literally and figuratively grinding out a living to support his family. And, more than anything, Max wanted to be on the ground floor. He wanted to be, as he called it, “one of the big boys,” someone who controlled his own destiny, could call the shots for himself, and had status. Striking it rich wouldn’t have been bad, either. Is it any surprise that one of his favorite songs was “If I Were a Rich Man” from Fiddler on the Roof? As he sang it around the apartment, doing his best Zero Mostel imitation, we would all laugh, and so would he—but underneath it was a serious matter for him.

Like a lot of people, he had his dream, but he also had a few plans for achieving it. He was determined to try, and his sons watched it all and learned.


It was one thing to have a store on the Street, but even then there was a hierarchy. The main floors typically housed 50 or 60 individually owned booths in which a retailer could exhibit his merchandise to the customers who came in to browse. The ultimate goal was to have a “window”—storefront property where your merchandise could be displayed not just to the people who bothered to open the door and come in but to every passerby on the street. This was the Boardwalk and Park Place. And in the fall of 1965, a window property became available—23 West 47th. The dream was about to become reality.

Over the years, Max had saved around $25,000. This was our rainy-day money, but my father was dreaming of sunshine every day.

In Max’s world, there were no I.P.O.’s to raise money, no investor cocktail parties at $1,000 a head. This was small business with big dreams—you saved your money, bought your store, and took your shot. And he wasn’t investing his nest egg to have just another window full of diamonds—no, he had a plan.

Diamonds combined with jade! It was just what he needed to single himself out, a new product, something the Street hadn’t seen before, and Max was going to corner the market. He imported the finest jade available and set out to design all types of merchandise—rings, earrings, bracelets—all with the moodiness of the deep-green Chinese stone offset by occasional flashes of light from the diamonds.


Around this time, sensing that it was harder to go it alone and be successful, he also found himself a partner. With a partner, one person could mind the store while the other hunted up new opportunities. In theory, he was right in every respect. In practice, he got the wrong guy. The man he chose had none of Max’s drive or vision, but was willing to hang on for a ride. My mother, never one to keep an opinion to herself, pointed out these defects repeatedly. My father didn’t listen, but in his heart I believe he knew she was right, and this would come into play years later.

And so the store finally opened. A glorious day—a “premiere.” Max was officially in business! He had moved downstairs and become one of the big boys. And the best part of all was that business was great. His instinct to come up with something new was paying off: the customers were buying his stuff—he had a hit! The store provided a common interest for the whole family. In our apartment, the talk at dinner had changed, and it was wonderful. Every night, we would wait for him to come home to hear how he had done that day. Instead of the drudgery of the daily grind, now the discussions were of actual sales being made and how they had transpired. My brother and I would memorize the percentages and tally up the profits. Thirty to 40 percent from selling just one $1,800 bracelet meant upwards of $540 take-home—an entire week’s pay in the old days. Harvey and I quickly grew dissatisfied with a pair of earrings being sold for a mere $600, but Max would always remind us that “it all adds up.”

My brother and I asked every question we could think of and soaked up the answers. And one summer day Harvey had an opportunity to prove just how well he had been listening. Max’s partner had the day off, and my father had an appointment and left his 13-year-old son to mind the store. Upon Max’s return, Harvey informed him that he had sold a diamond ring to a woman for $1,200. Stunned, Max turned to the other owners nearby for confirmation. Equally amazed, even after witnessing the transaction, they grudgingly assured Max he had a “supersalesman” in the family.

Another incident was in hindsight so full of foreshadowing that “ironic” is too small a word to describe it. Max returned home from work one day beaming.

“You won’t believe who came in the store today.”

“Who? Who?”

“Mel Brooks!”


Now, my father’s absolute favorite movie, and I swear on this, was The Producers. It starred his favorite actor, Zero Mostel; it had a great story; and Mel Brooks was the funniest man alive. And the genius who had made this movie had been in the store! Being the starstruck Jewish family that we were, the first question that occurred to us was: “Did he buy anything?” My father told us that he hadn’t, but he did sign an autograph. Max pulled out a business card and turned it over. On the back was written, “To Max and his two rotten sons—Mel Brooks.” We laughed and it was a cute little story. But cut to 34 years later. I was with my brother on the afternoon of the Academy Awards, the year Shakespeare in Love was in the running for best picture. I asked him if he had a speech written should he win, and he said he didn’t. I told him to write something down, just in case. He quickly scribbled something out and read it back to me. My only suggestion for a change was to use Mel Brooks’s line: instead of thanking his two daughters, thank his “two rotten kids.” It would be different, I assured him, and it would get a laugh. Well, the movie did win, and Harvey—via Mel—did get the laugh.

But the serendipity didn’t end there. Not long after, Mel Brooks called Harvey to say that he was offering a few people the opportunity to invest in a new Broadway musical he had written based on his film The Producers, and Harvey and I were on the list. Of course, we accepted. Two years later we were fortunate enough to be up onstage with Mel Brooks and the rest of the producers of The Producers, receiving the Tony Award for best new musical—the only award my brother and I have ever won for doing no more than signing a check. Max would have loved it.

During the time he owned the window, my father was happy. He was fulfilling his long-held dream, and work didn’t seem like work anymore now that he was his own man. This lasted for two or three years, but the heady days of the first sales passed, and competition from some of the bigger big boys on the Street increased; Max wasn’t the only one who could buy jade. Gradually, as with so many small businesses, the economic pressure took its toll on Max’s window. It gets difficult to ride out the tough times when you need to make changes but lack the capital to implement them. Business started slowing down and the store couldn’t break even.
And the partner Max had sought out for advice, support, collaboration, etc., proved himself to be nothing more than a glorified employee at the end of the day.

The store eventually had to be closed. The lease was not renewed, and the remaining merchandise was sold to the bottom feeders at rock-bottom prices. Max had taken his shot, experienced success and, ultimately, failure, and now he was headed upstairs again, back to grinding out his daily living to keep his family afloat. My brother and I knew how filled with hurt and disappointment Max was, and we watched him accept this with grace and dignity and we loved him for it. One thing we didn’t know at the time was that in Max’s mind this was merely a temporary setback. He had had a taste of success, and as he headed upstairs he was already making plans.

The Comeback

Max took his next big business shot in the winter of 1971, when I was 17 years old. Harvey had already started college, and I had just graduated from high school six months early, in January. Eight months with nothing to do before I went away to college in the fall sounded like Nirvana, and I was ready to take it easy. But my father had other plans for me. A new business opportunity had arrived, he had $20,000 saved up in the rainy-day account, and he was taking me with him.

A new product had emerged on the scene, a synthetic diamond marketed under the brand name Diamonair. Each gem was promised to be pure white, with none of the imperfections of real stones. A working-class guy could buy his fiancée or wife a beautiful stone the color and size of a $100,000 real diamond for just $1,000. For the customer, what a bargain! For Max, what an opportunity!

The Street was ready to accept this new merchandise and sell it right alongside the real stuff. And this time my father had come up with a different way in: he wasn’t going to be selling the goods retail in a window on the Street. He was going to get in on the action even earlier by buying the equipment needed to cut the new material, hiring his own workers, setting up a shop, manufacturing the goods, and selling them to the dealers on the Street.


Once it came time to hire and train the workers needed to cut the Diamonairs, my father realized he couldn’t afford to hire experienced cutters with families to support, so he came up with an innovative and, in retrospect, a pretty open-minded plan. He recruited several of my brother’s friends who were still in that one- or two-year limbo that people sometimes fall into between high school and the next step, be it college or career. He trained them and paid them less than a real diamond cutter would make but more money than they could dream of making elsewhere. I, of course, was drafted by my father to be one of his elite crew. So one morning, off I went with Max on the subway into Manhattan. On 47th Street, we met up with a group of guys who looked like the Dirty Dozen by way of the Grateful Dead: five longhaired “hippie types,” in the jargon of the day. I was a little scared of them, but Max saw nothing but his first-ever employees. They turned out to be the greatest, sweetest, hardest-working crew on the Street. I was a young 17, they were 19 and experienced, and working with them I learned a lot more than just how to cut Diamonairs. My father was a strong but patient teacher, and at the end of six weeks we were all trained. We each made $300 a week—a gold mine for us—and my father was back in business. He would never let pride get in the way of making an honest dollar, so when Max wasn’t out hustling up new customers, he was cutting right alongside us. I can remember looking up from my cutting machine to see my old man down at the other end of the row of benches; in between us were Jerry Garcia, Bob Weir, Telly Savalas, and John Cassavetes.

Our shop had the most unusual atmosphere of any on the Street. Most of the manufacturing houses had 8 to 10 employees, usually Hasidic Jews, in the traditional long black coats, white shirts, and yarmulkes, working side by side in almost absolute silence. It wasn’t that they were antisocial; they just seemed to take a Zen-like approach to their job. Maybe that was how they trained their minds to deal with the monotony of the work. By way of contrast, the shop my father ran was filled nonstop with the music of the Grateful Dead, the Allman Brothers, Pink Floyd, the Who, etc. My father’s occasional request for some Sinatra was always quickly rebuffed. Everyone had his own style, and that was fine with Max, as long as the work got done. That’s what we loved about him, and why the work always did get done.

Some afternoons my father would come back from an appointment and notice a strange aroma wafting from the bathroom. He would ask the guys if they were smoking any of those “funny cigarettes.” They would just smile and my father would move on. One of the guys once overheard Max on the telephone, obviously in the middle of an argument with my mother. When Max hung up, the guy handed him a joint and advised him to take it home and smoke it later that night with Miriam to “ease the tension.” No kidding—and my father took it. I have no idea what actually happened later (and my mother’s not telling), but it puts a smile on my face to this day to imagine Miriam and Max puffing on a joint together and forgetting the silly problems of the day.

Eventually, it was time for me to head off to college. Max had been holding my $300 a week for me for the whole eight months, so I was looking forward to having a cool nine grand or so to take with me. When it came time to collect, I got the shock of my life: it didn’t exist! Max had used what would have been my salary to buy new equipment for the shop. My own father had “taken” my hard-earned money! Boy, did I scream. Miriam said, “Max, how could you?” His reply? “It needed to be done and that’s that.” The way he saw it, it was a small price for a lifetime of room and board; the business needed it and that was more important. He didn’t feel one ounce of guilt, and in time I had to respect him for doing what he had to for the shop, even if it was with my salary.

The business survived a few more years with the usual ups and downs. Max had hoped to open several shops, but the demand for Diamonairs didn’t last, and his one shop closed down. He tried little business ideas from time to time, but that shop was really his last hurrah, and he settled back into being someone else’s employee.
He was approaching 50 and was slowly starting to plan for other things, like traveling with my mother now that both kids were grown and out of the house.

He had no regrets. He had taken his shots, and just knowing he had really tried made him feel that he was successful. He was right.

For me and Harvey, the most important part of all my father’s business ventures was that they gave us an opportunity to work alongside him—for my brother, several summers, for me, eight straight months, side by side. There wasn’t any great advice given or big speeches made, but we had the opportunity to observe him in action day after day. We learned the “business” at the University of 47th Street. No actual school could have taught us what it really takes to run an enterprise. The vision, determination, stamina, hope, relentlessness, and sheer work that are involved in staying afloat, much less succeeding, are the same whether you are running a window on 47th Street or Miramax Films or Microsoft.

The Family

Max came from a family of nine children and yet felt no closeness to his brothers and sisters and had a distant relationship with his parents, particularly his father. Until he became an adult and created his own family, he felt very much alone. Most times, it seems that the human mind picks one of two ways to deal with a very negative aspect of childhood: either we subconsciously re-create the very situation we hated, or we consciously work very hard to make it different. Well, lucky for Harvey and me, our father was in the latter group, and his family was everything to him, especially the closeness of his sons. And this was not something we inferred or just felt. He told us outright.

It was sometime in 1963. I was seven and my brother was nine. My father called us to him, saying he had something “important” to discuss with us. Our minds began racing to figure out what our infraction had been to get the butt-whipping we were sure was coming. But that wasn’t what Max had in mind. He walked us into the living room and told us to take a seat in the two “club chairs.” Now we really knew something was up, because in our whole lives we had never, never been allowed to sit in these chairs or even look as if the thought of sitting in them might have crossed our mind. The expensive chairs were for “company only” and that was that. So we figured we were dead for sure. We obediently sat in our assigned seats and waited to hear what we had done. But what followed was the only “sit-down” speech my father ever made to me and my brother in our lives.

“I want you both to listen. I have something very important to tell you.”

He proceeded to recount the story of the Kennedy family: how John Kennedy was the president and had picked his brother Bobby to be the attorney general and how their old man, Joe Kennedy, had helped organize the entire election campaign. Joe and his two sons were a lesson in how important family was—if a family worked together, they could accomplish anything. He went on to say that John and Bobby Kennedy were the perfect example of how powerful that bond of family could be and that John had picked Bobby because he knew he could trust him like no other. Then came Max’s greatest leap, a leap that only a dreamer with an innocent purity of belief in the power of his dream could make.

“And you guys can accomplish as much as them. If you stick together, nothing is impossible.”

There it was in one sentence—the prime directive. The secret ingredient had been stirred in.
He went on to say that even if someday we ended up not working together we should always look out for each other, no matter what. But the implication remained. Together was better. And with this knowledge imparted, we were dismissed.

Giancana had longtime ties to the Kennedy clan, going back to JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy, who was involved with Giancana in the bootlegging business during Prohibition. Additionally, Gianciana was an associate of singer Frank Sinatra, a close Kennedy friend, and allegedly was a donor to JFK's 1960 Presidential campaign, at a time when politicians weren't required to disclose their deep-pockets contributors.

There also have been allegations that Giancana secretly helped JFK win the 1960 West Virginia primary, in which he bested fellow U.S. Sen. Hubert Humphrey, D-Minn. In 2009, Tina Sinatra, daughter of Kennedy friend Frank Sinatra, told the TV program "60 Minutes" that the legendary singer—at the behest of JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy—approached Giancana. Sinatra allegedly asked Giancana to use mob muscle to pressure local union members to vote for JFK. The request was made through an intermediate, Sinatra, because "it would be in Jack Kennedy's best interest if his father did not make the contact directly," Tina Sinatra explained.

In his 1997 book, The Dark Side of Camelot, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh alleged that the elder Kennedy eventually did meet with Giancana in Chicago, to solicit his support for JFK in the general election.

During the Kennedy Administration, the Chicago mobster, along with other crime figures, is known to have been enlisted by the CIA to plot the killing of Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

Giancana and Kennedy also shared a mistress, Judith Campbell Exner, with whom they were involved with at different times (Kennedy first, then the mob boss). In a 1988 People magazine article, Exner claimed that she arranged a meeting between then-Presidential candidate Kennedy and Giancana at the Fontainbleau Hotel in Miami in April 1960 at JFK's request. "I think I may need his help in the campaign," she claimed that Kennedy told her. Subsequently, Exner claimed, she arranged nine other meetings in 1960 and 1961, and personally witnessed at least one of the sit-downs. In addition, Exner later claimed that she carried mysterious envelopes between Kennedy and Giancana.

-- Was Kennedy Tied to the Mob?: Rigged Elections, Shared Mistresses, And An Assassination Plot, by Patrick J. Kiger


There's a quote from Kurt Vonnegut's book The Sirens of Titan and it always was the motto of Miramax and now The Weinstein Company. It says, 'Good can triumph over evil if the angels are as organized as the mafia.' That's how we built our company!

-- Harvey Weinstein Urges Jews to Take on Anti-Semites: "Kick These Guys in the Ass", by Scott Feinberg, Tina Daunt


“O.K., that’s it. Get out of here.”

The only thought I remember having as we slid out of the hallowed club chairs was how weird my father was. And as we went off to play baseball or football or whatever, Harvey and I didn’t discuss what Max had just said to us. Nor in the years to come did we ever, not once. The sentence “Remember what Dad said about sticking together … ” was never uttered by either of us. Somehow Max took his dream, bypassed our conscious minds, and injected it directly into our DNA.

On June 4, 1976, as he was walking up the front stoop after a day at work, just as he had every other weekday of his adult life, my father died of a sudden heart attack at the age of 52. I was now 22 and my brother was 24.

Image
-- Frank Sinatra, center, with Harvey Weinstein, right, and Weinstein business partner Corky in Buffalo on Oct. 4, 1974. Photo by Mickey Osterreicher.


Max had lived to see Harvey achieve a high level of success as a concert promoter in Buffalo, where he put on all kinds of shows, from Frank Sinatra and Bette Midler to the Grateful Dead. And my father had gone to listen to and meet them all, even the Dead.

I had dropped out of college, having set the record for lowest number of credits earned over two years. I then moved to Buffalo to live with my brother and began promoting movie festivals in the theater Harvey owned, to keep the money coming in between live concerts.

One day the rock group Genesis came to perform. They mentioned to my brother that they had a concert film they had made, and asked if he knew anyone who could promote it nationally. He told them his brother, Bob, was the best movie promoter in the country and could easily do the job. At the time, I didn’t know a single theater outside of Buffalo.


Thrown into a job you know nothing about with no way out, you learn very fast. Genesis: A Band in Concert, as it was titled, became the first picture we owned together. The seeds were being planted—we just didn’t know it.

Harvey was becoming frustrated with the concert-promotion business, and I was busy doing my thing, but not enjoying doing it alone. The “club-chair conversation” must have been working in both our subconsciouses, because it wasn’t much longer before Harvey and I set out to start our company for real. I came up with the name in an hour, Harvey approved it in a minute, and Miramax was born.

Twenty-five years have passed, and I have so many memories: a hundred Miriam stories, a thousand Harvey stories, and even more Bob-and-Harvey stories. As our company has grown, and continues to grow, and as our families do the same, the stories multiply. But the Max stories stopped on that June day in 1976.

As for you, Max, well, your best “shot,” the one you nurtured all through our childhood, has paid off: your sons are making movies that you would love, they can hold their own with anyone when it comes to business, and they are not only each other’s partner but best friend as well—an alliance that cannot be broken.

Bob Weinstein, 62, said that he's barely spoken to his brother in the past five years. He emphasized that he was not aware of his brother's alleged sexual misconduct but instead thought Harvey Weinstein was engaged in adultery with one woman after another.

"I could not take his cheating," he said, referring to Harvey Weinstein's marriage to wife Georgina Chapman, "his lying and also his attitude toward everyone."

With the allegations now made against Harvey Weinstein, Bob Weinstein said, "My brother has caused unconscionable suffering ... I want him to get the justice that he deserves."

-- Bob Weinstein says 'sick and depraved' brother Harvey Weinstein abused him, by Joi-Marie McKenzie


You also have four grandchildren: my two daughters, aged 22 and 17, and Harvey’s daughters, aged 7 and 4. And rest assured, both sets of sisters hear all the stories of Grandpa Max, and there are two important lessons from their grandfather that we will always keep alive: that they are each other’s greatest ally, and that their hair always “looks great.”
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:31 am

Was Kennedy Tied to the Mob?: Rigged Elections, Shared Mistresses, And An Assassination Plot
by Patrick J. Kiger
National Geographic
October 23, 2013

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image

It seems almost unfathomable that one of the most admired Presidents in U.S. history may have had ties to mobsters. Nevertheless, in the half-century since President John F. Kennedy's assassination in Dallas, dark allegations have arisen about dealings between JFK and organized crime figures. Some even have charged—though without conclusive proof—that the President's killing actually was a mob hit.

Much of the speculation about an illicit working relationship between JFK and the mafia focuses upon Sam Giancana, the former head of the Chicago crime syndicate, who had a number of apparent Venn-diagram intersections with the President.

Image
-- Sam Giancana

Giancana (pictured) had longtime ties to the Kennedy clan, going back to JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy, who was involved with Giancana in the bootlegging business during Prohibition. Additionally, Gianciana was an associate of singer Frank Sinatra, a close Kennedy friend, and allegedly was a donor to JFK's 1960 Presidential campaign, at a time when politicians weren't required to disclose their deep-pockets contributors.

There also have been allegations that Giancana secretly helped JFK win the 1960 West Virginia primary, in which he bested fellow U.S. Sen. Hubert Humphrey, D-Minn. In 2009, Tina Sinatra, daughter of Kennedy friend Frank Sinatra, told the TV program "60 Minutes" that the legendary singer—at the behest of JFK's father, Joseph P. Kennedy—approached Giancana. Sinatra allegedly asked Giancana to use mob muscle to pressure local union members to vote for JFK. The request was made through an intermediate, Sinatra, because "it would be in Jack Kennedy's best interest if his father did not make the contact directly," Tina Sinatra explained.

In his 1997 book, The Dark Side of Camelot, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh alleged that the elder Kennedy eventually did meet with Giancana in Chicago, to solicit his support for JFK in the general election.


During the Kennedy Administration, the Chicago mobster, along with other crime figures, is known to have been enlisted by the CIA to plot the killing of Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

Giancana and Kennedy also shared a mistress, Judith Campbell Exner, with whom they were involved with at different times (Kennedy first, then the mob boss). In a 1988 People magazine article, Exner claimed that she arranged a meeting between then-Presidential candidate Kennedy and Giancana at the Fontainbleau Hotel in Miami in April 1960 at JFK's request. "I think I may need his help in the campaign," she claimed that Kennedy told her. Subsequently, Exner claimed, she arranged nine other meetings in 1960 and 1961, and personally witnessed at least one of the sit-downs. In addition, Exner later claimed that she carried mysterious envelopes between Kennedy and Giancana.

Giancana was murdered in 1975 just before he was scheduled to testify to a U.S. Senate committee investigating the CIA, with whom he had participated in a Castro assassination plot.

The suspicions about links between JFK and mobsters also fuel conspiracy theories that the mob may somehow have been involved in the President's murder.

The mob certainly had potential motives. Several mob leaders were upset that Kennedy had failed to overthrow Cuban leader Fidel Castro, who had closed down their lucrative casinos in Havana after he took power in 1959. The President's brother, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, further had aroused their animosity by launching a high-profile probe of organized crime and aggressively pursued Teamsters Union leader Jimmy Hoffa (pictured) for alleged corruption and ties to the Mafia.

Image
-- Jimmy Hoffa

In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations re-examined acoustic recordings of the gun shots in Dealey Plaza that day, eye-witness accounts, as well as Oswald's possible ties to the Mob, and reported that Kennedy's murder probably was the product of a conspiracy, but found no evidence that organized crime syndicates as a group had played a role. The committee also didn't rule out the possibility that individual mobsters with a beef against JFK could have played a role.

The House assassination committee's chief counsel and staff director, G. Robert Blakey, told the New York Times in 1979 that in his own mind, the link was much clearer. "I think the Mob did it," he said.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:00 am

How two publications raced each other to disclose a Hollywood horror story
by Paul Farhi
The Washington Post
October 10, 2017

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
Journalist Ronan Farrow arrives for the White House Correspondents' Association dinner in 2015. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

Like heavyweights exchanging haymakers, two New York news outlets have taken turns over the past few days landing knockout blows against Harvey Weinstein, who just days earlier was one of the most powerful men in Hollywood.

The New York Times was the first to report last week about Weinstein’s alleged predations on actresses and underlings who worked on his movies and for his Hollywood production companies, Miramax and the Weinstein Co. But in a story published Tuesday and written by Ronan Farrow — himself the progeny of Hollywood royalty — the New Yorker magazine added significant detail to the Times’ initial report.

This was followed two hours later by another Times story that included new accounts about Weinstein from the likes of Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie.

The 1-2-3 combination portrayed Weinstein unmistakably as a serial harasser and — at least in Farrow’s bombshell account — as an alleged rapist.

The revelations were the product of a journalistic footrace between Farrow and the Times’ reporters, led by investigative reporter Jodi Kantor. The two outlets became aware that they were chasing the same story weeks ago when they began interviewing some of the same people, including actress Rosanna Arquette.

“We knew they were working on something,” said Times Editor Dean Baquet on Tuesday. “And we were very competitive. . . . It did not cause us to rush through the reporting, but we certainly were determined to move quickly.”

New Yorker Editor David Remnick praised the Times’ work but suggested Farrow’s story wasn’t quite complete when the newspaper posted its first article last week. “I am not the least competitive person in the world,” he said, “but our stories are ready when they are ready, no matter what the competition does.”

The three stories report similar details and generally corroborate and complement each other. They describe encounters between Weinstein and young women that fit a pattern. Women quoted by both publications say they were lured to hotel rooms or other private places to discuss film work. They were then pressured for sexual favors by Weinstein with the implicit or overt promise of advancing their careers.

The stories also describe the ways in which Weinstein and his assistants kept the encounters quiet through intimidation, such as planting unfavorable stories about them in the news media, or via a series of cash payments for their silence.

The stories differ only in the degree of the alleged behavior, all of which Weinstein has denied. Farrow reports that Weinstein raped three women, including the actress-director Asia Argento and an aspiring actress named Lucia Evans.

Farrow’s story also adds an important corroborating element: a recording of Weinstein pressuring a model, Ambra Battilana Gutierrez, to enter his hotel room. Gutierrez had earlier reported to New York police that Weinstein had sexually assaulted her in a business meeting; officials obtained the recording by outfitting Gutierrez with a hidden wire (Weinstein was never charged with a crime).

The Times’ stories were principally written and reported by Kantor, who shared a byline with Megan Twohey on the first story last Thursday, and with Rachel Abrams on Tuesday.

Farrow had been working on the story for NBC News for months and had made contact with some of Weinstein’s accusers. But his NBC bosses balked at airing the story. There is dispute over why, though an NBC employee familiar with the matter said Farrow lacked sufficient reporting to get such a powerful story on the air.

In any case, a frustrated Farrow negotiated the release of the story from NBC’s control in August. He subsequently brought it to the New Yorker. (Farrow did not respond to requests for comment.)

To an extent, the competition to break the story may have been good for both publications. With several reporters pursuing long-standing rumors about Weinstein, sources who had been reluctant to talk might have been emboldened to come forward.

The Times’ initial story on Thursday, and the widespread condemnation of Weinstein that immediately followed, appeared to set the stage for Paltrow, Jolie and Mira Sorvino to discuss their experiences with Weinstein in the New Yorker and the Times follow-up article. Said Baquet, “I’m a firm believer in competition. It is healthy. It makes us all better.”

Farrow, 29, is the son of actress Mia Farrow and Woody Allen, although his paternity is disputed. Mia Farrow suggested in 2013 that Ronan’s father might be Frank Sinatra, to whom Farrow was married before she began her relationship with Allen.

One of the women Ronan Farrow interviewed for his New Yorker article was Sorvino, who won an Oscar for her performance in “Mighty Aphrodite,” a Weinstein-produced film that was directed by Allen. Allen’s role and Farrow’s family connection wasn’t mentioned in the article, however.

Farrow’s MSNBC program lasted only about 13 months, from early 2014 to 2015. However, he continues to report for NBC; in May, he was the lead reporter on an investigation into leaks at nuclear waste storage tanks at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:04 am

Ronan Farrow on Harvey Weinstein Story: ‘I Was Threatened With a Lawsuit’
by Brian Steinberg @bristei Brian Steinberg
October 10, 2017

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
Ronan Farrow
CREDIT: CLINT SPAULDING/WWD/REX/SHUTTERSTOCK


Ronan Farrow didn’t break the first story of shocking allegations about movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, but his New Yorker piece published Tuesday has added a new sordid dimension to the scandal. Farrow discussed his story Tuesday evening on MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show,” and there’s good reason: He started the story under NBC’s auspices.

Asked why the story ran in the New Yorker rather than on NBC, Farrow told Maddow, “You would have to ask NBC and NBC executives about the details.”

“I will say that over many years, many news organizations have circled this story and faced a great deal of pressure in doing so,” he continued. “There are now reports emerging about the kind of pressure news organizations have faced. That is real. And in the course of this reporting, I was threatened with a lawsuit personally by Mr. Weinstein.”

He also challenged NBC’s statement that the version of the story they saw wasn’t publishable. “I walked into the door at the New Yorker with an explosively reportable piece that should have been public,” he said. “Immediately the New Yorker recognized that and it was not accurate to say that it was not reportable. In fact, there were multiple determinations at NBC that it was reportable.”


Farrow, who joined NBCUniversal in 2014 as a host on MSNBC, currently works as a freelancer for NBC News, and had been investigating sexual-harassment allegations against Weinstein for ten months. But when he brought early reporting on the subject to NBC News executives, “he didn’t have one accuser willing to go on the record or identify themselves,” according to one person familiar with the situation. The New Yorker story is”radically different” from the material that was brought to NBC News, this person said.

Another person familiar with the process, however, suggested Farrow did have strong material. This person said three women were named in Farrow’s reporting for NBC News. This person did not speculate as to why the story did not move forward at NBC News.

Farrow’s New Yorker piece includes harrowing descriptions of Weinstein’s behavior from women including Asia Argento, Rosanna Arquette and Mira Sorvino. Weinstein was fired by the board of the Weinstein Company on Sunday, in the wake of allegations revealed in the New York Times that he had been harassing women for many years.

Ronan Farrow, who is the son of Mia Farrow and is estranged from his father Woody Allen, has gone on record supporting his sister Dylan Farrow’s accusations of improper behavior by their father.

Farrow asked NBC News if he could bring his work to a print outlet, this person said, thinking that sources might be more willing to cooperate if they did not have to go on camera. NBC News agreed, according to the source, with the understanding that if he got the story published he would come back and talk about it for NBC outlets. But he’s also appearing elsewhere: Farrow is doing a segment with ABC News’ Juju Chang on tonight’s broadcast of ABC’s “Nightline.”
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Harvey Weinstein: 'Beautiful Girls' Scribe Scott Rosenbe

Postby admin » Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:24 am

A Brief History of Harvey Weinstein's Relationship With the Democratic Party
by Ellie Shechet
jezebel.com
10/06/17 4:13pm

NOTICE: THIS WORK MAY BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO READ THE COPYRIGHT NOTICE AT THIS LINK BEFORE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING WORK, THAT IS AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR PRIVATE STUDY, SCHOLARSHIP OR RESEARCH PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107 AND 108. IN THE EVENT THAT THE LIBRARY DETERMINES THAT UNLAWFUL COPYING OF THIS WORK HAS OCCURRED, THE LIBRARY HAS THE RIGHT TO BLOCK THE I.P. ADDRESS AT WHICH THE UNLAWFUL COPYING APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED. THANK YOU FOR RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS.


Image
Harvey Weinstein with Hillary Clinton in 2012. Image via Getty.

On Thursday, a bombshell story in the New York Times reported on decades’ worth of sexual harassment allegations against the powerful Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. “Women have been talking about Harvey amongst ourselves for a long time,” actress Ashley Judd told the paper, “and it’s simply beyond time to have the conversation publicly.”

On Thursday evening, New York’s Rebecca Traister published a chilling account of her own past experience with Weinstein, in which she claims Weinstein called her a “cunt” back in 2000, allegedly dragged her then-boyfriend in a headlock out of a party onto Sixth Avenue, managing mostly [to] avoid negative press coverage “despite the dozens of camera flashes that went off on that sidewalk that night.” She writes that reporters, including the late David Carr, tried in vain “for years” to write a story that the enormous legal, professional, and political apparatus around Weinstein made nearly impossible.

(In his rather odd and lengthy statement to the New York Times, Weinstein did not deny the facts of the piece, but his lawyer Lisa Bloom also said that that “he denies many of the accusations as patently false.” After it was published he specifically denied Ashley Judd’s accusation and his lawyer, Charles Harder, announced plans to sue the paper. Harder was Hulk Hogan’s lawyer in a suit that was part of a successful campaign to bankrupt Gawker by billionaire Peter Thiel, and he is currently involved in litigation against this website.)

Since the early ’90s, around the same time as the earliest allegations featured in the NYT story, Weinstein has been a prominent donor to progressive causes, most notably the Democratic party. Weinstein and his money tend to pop up in articles mapping out the Democratic party’s ties to corporate interests and big donors. Despite its uneven lurch toward progressivism, the Democratic party’s ties to big donors remain considerable—if not necessarily comparable, organizationally, to the complex networks of a few radical billionaires that direct the conservative movement—and Weinstein has represented this special political class for some time as a reliable presence and sometime-host at the party’s most glittering fundraisers.

In a 1996 article in the New York Daily News, for example, Weinstein, then with Miramax Films, was noted as an example of a big “soft money” donor who was honored with an invitation to a White House state dinner. A longtime Clinton donor, he schmoozed with the Clintons at Martha’s Vineyard in 1997 and contributed, along with other Hollywood figures like Barbra Streisand and Steven Spielberg, to President Bill Clinton’s legal defense fund during Kenneth Starr’s investigation; over the years, he has supported Hillary Clinton’s successful Senate bid and both of her presidential campaigns, as well as Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign and John Kerry’s in 2004. Gore’s campaign drew calls of hypocrisy for criticizing the increasing violence portrayed in films (my, how the world has changed) while enjoying support from Weinstein, whose Miramax studio distributed many of them.

“The centerpiece of the Gore-Lieberman remarks on the entertainment industry is that Hollywood may need to be regulated,” Ari Fleischer, then-spokesman for George W. Bush’s campaign, told the Washington Post a few months prior to the 2000 election. “Then one of the co-hosts of tomorrow’s event is the same person who perfected the art of selling to children things that shouldn’t be seen by children.”

According to campaign finance records, Weinstein began donating to the Democratic party in the early 1990s. He has personally donated to Democratic Senators including Kirsten Gillibrand, Al Franken, Cory Booker, Chuck Schumer, Richard Blumenthal, Elizabeth Warren, Patrick Leahy, Martin Heinrich, and Sheldon Whitehouse, though he also donated to the failed 2010 Nevada Senate campaign of Republican investment banker John Gregory Chachas. (Following the Times story, several Democrats hurriedly announced plans to give away Weinstein’s money.) According to the Center for Responsive Politics, he’s shelled out hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and has also donated to state Democratic parties; in total, his political donations amount to over $1.4 million.

While he was writing these checks, according to the New York Times report, he was also allegedly doing this:

In interviews, eight women described varying behavior by Mr. Weinstein: appearing nearly or fully naked in front of them, requiring them to be present while he bathed or repeatedly asking for a massage or initiating one himself. The women, typically in their early or middle 20s and hoping to get a toehold in the film industry, said he could switch course quickly — meetings and clipboards one moment, intimate comments the next. One woman advised a peer to wear a parka when summoned for duty as a layer of protection against unwelcome advances.


Xochitl Hinojosa, Communications Director of the Democratic National Committee responded to Jezebel’s questions about the allegations against Weinstein with the following statement:

The allegations in the New York Times report are deeply troubling. The Democratic party condemns all forms of sexual harassment and assault. We hope that Republicans will do the same as we mark one year since the release of a tape showing President Trump bragging about sexually assaulting women followed by more than a dozen women who came forward to detail similar experiences of assault and harassment.

The DNC will donate over $30,000 in contributions from Weinstein to EMILY’s List, Emerge America and Higher Heights because what we need is more women in power, not men like Trump who continue to show us that they lack respect for more than half of America.


Although the NYT report brought Weinstein’s treatment of women into the realm of open discussion, stories of his apparently odious behavior toward human beings in general—which he blamed, in a 2004 New York profile, on his blood-glucose levels—have long been available to the public, from allegedly fighting with an employee over a bowl of M&Ms and eating them off the floor, to allegedly harassing producer Syndey Pollack on his deathbed. Occasionally, reports showed this kind of behavior extending into the political sphere, where Weinstein was increasingly influential.

For example, a blistering profile of Weinstein for New York in 2001 by David Carr included a bizarre anecdote about Weinstein’s involvement in the 2001 New York City mayoral campaign. In a matter of days, Weinstein had switched from supporting Democratic frontrunner Mark Green to eventually victorious Republican candidate Michael Bloomberg, after Green reportedly dismissed Weinstein’s attempt to play peacemaker between Green and his primary opponent Fernando Ferrer. From New York:

“All I want to fucking do is fucking unite this fucking city, and you won’t let me!” Weinstein screamed, according to a Green source. With that, Weinstein called the Republican candidate and offered his support. “Bloomberg was willing to reach out to working-class communities Harvey relates to,” says a Miramax spokesperson.

A Green lieutenant saw it another way: “It’s what can happen when he doesn’t get his way,” the source says.


Several years later, in 2008, CNN reported that Weinstein, then supporting Hillary Clinton’s primary campaign against Barack Obama, threatened to cut off funding to congressional Democrats if then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi didn’t heed Clinton’s call to finance revotes in Florida and Michigan (Weinstein denied doing this). From CNN:

Another person familiar with the phone call said what might have upset Pelosi is that Weinstein also suggested that if Democratic leaders “did not fix” the Florida and Michigan problem, powerful Democrats may abandon the eventual party nominee in favor of Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, in November.


Pelosi refused, CNN reported, and Weinstein eventually got on the Obama train. During Obama’s 2012 campaign, Weinstein was noted as a top “bundler” from the entertainment industry as Hollywood money swept in to fill the donation gap left by a newly-regulated Wall Street. Shortly before that year’s election, Republicans were infuriated by news that the film Seal Team Six: the Raid on Osama bin Laden, premiering just days before the election, was tweaked by Weinstein himself to expand Obama’s role. Malia Obama interned for Weinstein this past spring, two years after Weinstein was publicly accused of groping Italian model Ambra Battilana.

(A quick aside here: the Times reported that this alleged incident ended in a settlement after Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance, Jr. declined to press charges. Vance, a Democrat, allegedly received a $10,000 donation from Weinstein’s lawyer David Boies shortly afterwards. As you may recall, Vance was recently in the news after revelations that he dropped charges against Ivanka Trump and Don Jr. in 2012 after a visit from Trump lawyer Marc Kasowitz, a Vance donor. Vance denied wrongdoing in the latter case, and in the former, denied that David Boies was Weinstein’s lawyer in the 2015 investigation. Boies also denied ever speaking to Vance about Weinstein. Vance is currently running unopposed for reelection.)

This Letter of Engagement supersedes all prior agreements, written or otherwise, between the parties (including, in particular, the Letter of Engagement, dated October 24, 2014, between Black Cube and the Firm, acting on behalf of the Client (hereinafter “the Original LoE”) and the Client, whether written, oral or otherwise) and Black Cube acknowledges and agrees that it is not and will not be entitled to any fees (whether success fees or otherwise, whether pursuant paragraphs 16 through 18 of the Original LoE or otherwise) or costs under the Original LoE.

-- Harvey Weinstein’s Army of Spies: The film executive hired private investigators, including ex-Mossad agents, to track actresses and journalists, by Ronan Farrow


Up until the release of the Times report, Weinstein seems to have remained in the good graces of prominent Democrats. In July of this year, Page Six reported that Weinstein and his wife, Marchesa designer Georgina Chapman, had a private meeting with Sen. Kamala Harris, who, though a recent backer of Bernie Sanders’ single-payer health care proposal, has attracted scrutiny from Sanders’ wing of the party for her record as California’s attorney general and for her ties to the donor class.

BuzzFeed reported on Thursday that Weinstein was helped in his effort to get out ahead of the Times story in a pro bono capacity by Anita Dunn, an Obama campaign staffer and former White House communications director. Dunn is currently managing director of D.C. PR firm SKDKnickerbocker, best known for its PR work on behalf of Democratic clients (and also Herbalife). According to BuzzFeed sources, former Bill Clinton special counsel Lanny Davis was also “central” to this PR push. Since his work for Clinton, Davis has written columns for The Hill, lobbied on behalf of human rights violators and sold passports to various Caribbean islands.

It’s disingenuous at best for Republicans to use Harvey Weinstein as a political talking point considering who lives in the White House right now, as the DNC’s Hinojosa points out, but that hasn’t stopped them; it’s likely that Weinstein will remain wedged into the conservative vernacular for some time, somewhere between #Benghazi and HER EMAILS. What gives this story particular political traction for the GOP, beyond the hypocrisy of a progressive donor and distributor of films like The Hunting Ground being called as a serial sexual harasser, is that it puts a rather hideous face on the entrenched donor system that continues to polarize the two wings of the Democratic party.

One could certainly argue that Weinstein’s money and influence over the Democratic party is nothing compared to that of the Kochs or the Mercers over the Republicans, and was simply the means to an end in a hopelessly corrupt political process. It will also no doubt be argued that none of the politicians or Democratic operatives who took Weinstein’s money had ever heard whispers of these allegations; but whether or not you believe professional political operatives fearful of being outspent by the Kochs and the Mercers were completely out of the loop on this “open secret” is up to you.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36183
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

PreviousNext

Return to The First Sex (All Embryos are Girls)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests