Erika Kirk’s NEWEST LIE – This Time About Her Dating Past! The Jimmy Dore Show Dec 20, 2025 The Jimmy Dore Show PODCAST
Allegations have surfaced suggesting that Turning Point USA CEO Erika Kirk fabricated major parts of her personal backstory, especially her claims that she “never dated” while living in New York and didn’t drink, despite multiple videos, photos, and social posts showing otherwise.
Jimmy highlights her past relationship with Daily Wire senior editor Cabot Phillips, the scrubbing of their history, and the strange coincidence that he is now doing “How to Lead Like Charlie” events after Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Jimmy also points to evidence suggesting previous engagements or serious relationships, plus reality-show footage contradicting her claims about dating and alcohol. The larger takeaway is that her public persona appears manufactured for conservative branding, while the internet keeps uncovering receipts that undermine that image.
Charlie Kirk and The Daily Wire were allied institutions in the conservative media ecosystem: Kirk was a frequent guest and interview subject on Daily Wire programming, Daily Wire hosts appeared on The Charlie Kirk Show, Daily Wire personalities were prominent at TPUSA events (which Daily Wire also covered), Daily Wire collaborated with TPUSA on documentary content (e.g., Identity Crisis), and after Kirk’s death Daily Wire publicly donated $1 million to TPUSA. -- chatgpt, 12/21/25
Transcript
But guess what? So this guy who's allegedly the ex-boyfriend of Erica Kirk, she dated him right before Charlie, that's the story. He's now being tapped to go around and take over for Charlie.
It said how to lead like Charlie. Kat Phillips, senior editor, Daily Wire, Turning Point USA. So, it turns out Erica Kirk has been caught in even more lies. Unbelievable. I'm shocked. So, we got caught the So, here's here's more lies coming out of TPUSA. She's the CEO. And well, here's what she said about their dating life. I lived out here. I was here for 5 years. I never dated here cuz I saw vicariously through my roommate how terrible it was. She never dated for 5 years. The whole time she was in New York. Somehow getting drinks was the replacement of having coffee and breakfast. I personally would rather have coffee or brunch with someone than going I just I don't drink. I find it unproductive. Not because I'm holier than whatever. I that's not I just don't operate that way. But I always thought it was very strange how she would go to drinks with one guy and then go to dinner with another. My situation was a little different. I went to you went to a job interview literally. So this is how good the Lord is. He knew that because I was not dating in New York City. He knew that in order for me to know that that was my man, he had to blanket Charlie as a job interview. Because if that went in, no joke, if he came to me and said, "Hey, let's go on a date to Bill's Burgers." I'd be like, she'd be like, "No, I lived out here." I was, "No, she's not going." So, I just think it's funny how people think God works like that. Like, oh, God had to set us up on this thing. But then uh he wanted to set us up to get married so I could watch him be assassinated on in 4K a couple years later. God didn't intervene on that. So it's just a it's just it's to me it's a sophomoric way to look at God. It's very sophomoric. But anyway, uh turns out she was dating what turns out. So she was dating this guy named Cabot Phillips.
Uh this is from I think 20 I think this is 2017. It said yes, we're that couple who gets painting lessons together. There they are. Turns out this guy's also a buddy was a buddy of Charlie's and his father's got ties to the war machine. Here is uh here's her name was Erica France by the way. And this is from November 29th, 2017.
And she says, "Since this is where it all started, I only found it appropriate to wish you a very happy birthday. Cash cab xxx your catfish."
Here's another social media post from uh this is I guess an Instagram. I don't go on Instagram. This is what it looks like. It says uh Luna Bear Studios prepping another couple's gallery for delivery and a heart. Erica France and JT Massie 5, you're both amazing humans and I loved showing shooting with you. So much laughter and love. It was perfection. What? So, there's that.
And then they scrubbed. And what makes it all more suspicious is that that uh Cash Cab guy uh Cabot Phillips and Erica scrubbed all those posts. So all so the post is gone, but people responding to the post is there. How cute you are y'all. Oh, gorgeous couple. But the post is gone.
And here's that guy with Charlie. Yes, I beat Cabot one-on-one. That was from September 24th, 2017, eight years ago. No, not six. So that So he reposted that. Okay. He also, get this, this is weird.
So this guy Cabot Phillips, he's a head editor over at the Daily Wire, which is a, you know, and he said, "Just discovered that Obama is one of those dads who brings an iPad on vacation to take pics of his family, and it's the greatest thing ever." What? I don't understand. What is he? Is he doing that thing where you play both sides of the fence? Because that's what it sounds like. But guess what? So, this guy who's allegedly the ex-boyfriend of Erica Kirk, she dated him right before Charlie. That's the story. He's now being tapped to go around and take over for Charlie.
It said how to lead like Charlie. Cabot Phillips, senior editor, Daily Wire, Turning Point USA. So these do hosted by TurningPoint USA at South Central Kentucky Community and Technical College. So that's just one of them. That's December 16th, 5:30 p.m. How to lead like Charlie. So that isn't that weird? Yeah, I think it is weird. Yeah. I found this also. Monday, October 6th, 2025, University Union Building in Flagstaff, Arizona. How to fight like Charlie Fort Cabbat. What does that FT mean? FT cabbid Phillips. What does FT stand for? I don't know. But anyway, says, "How to fight like Charlie Cabbid Phillips." That's That's not even a month after the assassination. Uh here's what our friend James Lee had to say about it. Let's listen to James Lee. Erica Kirk's backstory has just been exposed as a giant lie. allegedly when I lived out here. I was here for 5 years. I never dated here because I saw vicariously through my roommate how terrible it was. I just I don't drink. I find it unproductive. We don't know for sure if she wasn't drinking, but she did really enjoy posing with alcoholic beverages.
So, that might just be her modeling. So, I'll cut slack on that. But, we do have video of her. She was on a reality show and she went on a date on this reality show and she orders a wine on the reality show. So, just letting you know. So, there's that. So, you don't have to you could say, "Oh, I could dismiss this by saying, oh, she's probably just maybe she's just modeling for a for something."
Here's her with a glass of champagne. It says, "It's Wednesday, so treat yourself to a little champagne." And did she really not date while she lived in New York City? Well, here is a photo that the internet sleuth dug up from September of 2017 with one Cabot Phillips and the caption said, "Yes, we're that couple who gets painting lessons together." And here you could see Erica Franzie and Cabot Phillips. I don't know about you, but that looked like a little bit more than just a one-off date. It looked like they were an actual couple, as the caption said.
But interestingly, Kat Phillips was actually at one point Charlie Kirk's producer and he is now a senior editor at the Daily Wire. And just yesterday, December 16, 2025, he gave a talk about quote, "How to lead like Charlie." You got to understand, I am not from this world of media. And I think all this kind of incestuity is weird to me. So, not only do we now know that she was dating before Charlie, which is fine. It's a totally normal thing to do.
But she was also engaged, perhaps even married. Luna Bear Studios posted this on March 16th, 2015, prepping another couple's gallery for delivery. Erica France and JT Massie, you both are amazing humans, and I love shooting you. So much laughter and love. It was perfection. This is what happens when your entire image is propped up by something that just is not true. If you are not this woman, don't pretend to be. But the bigger point is, why does Erica have to lie about this? Is it just for her to prop up this image that she is a conservative woman, quote unquote, because you can't hide this kind of stuff.
The internet is undefeated. Erica Kirk's backstory.
So, hey, I said Shabbat shalom, James Lee. I said Shabbat shalom, James Lee. I said it with my Chucky eyes. I said it. You like that pick. So, here's someone. Uh, who is this? Knoxy. Knoxy put together an even better video, and some of it's really hard to hear, but I'll tell you what it is. Ready? is when I lived out here. I was here for 5 years. I never dated here because I saw vicariously through my roommate how terrible it was. I feel great about all. So, here she is on a date. So, she went on a reality show and here she is on a date. So, he's saying great about all of this and I don't know. I just wanted to get to know you a little bit more. There she is. They're on a date. I don't know. I just wanted to get to know you a little bit more and like I mean I don't even know how long you've been in New York.
Gosh, New York. I moved here four years ago. Somehow So there she is. She uh and she says getting drinks was a well getting drinks was the replacement of having coffee and breakfast.
I personally would rather have coffee or brunch with someone than I think you're a bright light in a very dark place. Um so let's go grab my So there she is out partying there. He says, "Let's go grab a mojito." You coming in here just like to get your number like, "Can I get your number?" Yeah, bet. They're real. You give like a mean background. This guy don't drink. I find it unproductive. This guy don't drink. I find it unproductive. So there she is. There they are on their first date. They met in that nightclub. We got her number.
Now they are on a first date.
Uh, you guys want to have a drink or food maybe? And she says, "I'll have a glass of your Chardonnay." So, this is how good I'll have a What? It's on video. What are the chances we would have a video of her ordering a cocktail? I'm going to guess 100%.
The Lord is he knew that because I was not dating in New York City.
He knew that in order for me to know that that was my man, he had to blanket Charlie as a job interview.
Because if that went in, no joke, if he came to me and said, "Hey, let's go on a date to Bill's Burgers." I'd be like, "I am so sorry. I thank you, but no, we're not."
So, it wasn't Bill's Burgers. It was some place called Sugar Mama. Is that what it was called?
I've honestly spent the majority of my life being one of the most sought after bachelors.
He spent most of his life being one of the most sought-after bachelors. That's what that guy just said.
Wow. Good for him. He's got a real good sense of ego.
Two weeks later. And according to this video, two weeks later, she was hooked up with Charlie. So there you go. Uh, more real sus stuff coming out of her. I didn't date for 5 years. Does anybody believe that? Does anybody believe that woman in the bikini showing up? She wasn't dating it. Does anybody believe someone who wants to go on a reality show wasn't dating? Does anybody believe that? Somebody's living in a young woman, a model, sexy model who's who's be who's who has no problem doing provocative photo shoots, which I have nothing against, by the way. I'm all for provocative photo shoots, but it seems to go against her brand. Hey, come see me on tour January 11th in Wkey Ki, Hawaii and January 30th in Los Angeles at the Comedy Store. Go to jimmydor.com for a link for tickets.
*************************
Charlie Kirk’s Widow Has Reality TV Dating History. Erika Kirk, née Frantzve, appeared on an episode of Bravo’s ‘Summer House’ in 2019. by Adam Downer Daily Beast Updated Sep. 13 2025 3:43PM EDT Published Sep. 13 2025 3:42PM EDT https://web.archive.org/web/20250927010 ... g-history/
Charlie Kirk (R) and and his wife Erika Lane Frantzve (L) on stage during the Turning Point USA Inaugural-Eve Ball. Samuel Corum/Getty Images
Eagle-eyed Bravo viewers were gobsmacked to discover that the widow of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk appeared on a reality television dating show in 2019.
On Thursday, TikToker @shannypants2 posted her discovery that Erika Kirk, née Frantzve, had a cameo on season 3 of the Bravo reality TV show Summer House.
[x]
@shannypants2
All roads lead to @Bravo #charliekirk #erikakirk #summerhouse
The then-single Erika, 36, was set up with by Carl Radke with his housemate Jordan Verroi. In the episode, Radke, 40, described Erika as “beautiful and religious.” Verroi was open about his Christian faith on the show.
Their date went well, and Erika told Jordan he was a “bright light in a very dark place.” On May 13, 2019, the same day the episode aired, Erika posted on Instagram that she turned down a full-time role on the show to pursue her Juris Master degree at Liberty University.
The Daily Beast has reached out to Verroi for comment.
Kirk turned down a full time role on Summer House to pursue her degree at Liberty University. Instagram / mserikakirk
Erika met Charlie shortly after filming her Summer House episode in 2018. The two wed in 2021 and have two children together, ages 3 and 1.
Erika made waves Friday night when she delivered remarks in her first public appearance following her husband’s killing. Though authorities say the suspect in Kirk’s killing, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, acted alone, Kirk continuously referred to “evildoers” in the plural as the party responsible for the shooting.
“They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God’s merciful love,” she said. “They should all know this: If you thought my husband’s mission was powerful before, you have no idea... what you have just unleashed across this entire country and this world.”
On Saturday morning, Erika posted pictures and video of herself mourning her husband at his wake to Instagram.
Charlie Kirk was killed Wednesday afternoon at Utah Valley University on a speaking tour. He was 31.
Candace Owens’ Theory Just Got BACKED by an Intel Insider… And It’s Chilling I AM COACH COLIN Dec 26, 2025 #CharlieKirk #CandaceOwens #TurningPointUSA
Candace Owens has been saying this from the start — and now a highly trained combat expert is backing her up.
In this episode, I break down why a former special operations insider says the official narrative doesn’t add up, why the timeline matters more than people realize, and how planning, location confusion, and execution point to outside involvement.
This wasn’t random. This wasn’t simple. And it definitely wasn’t a one-man operation.
We cover: • Why Candace believes this was a coordinated hit • What a combat expert sees that others are missing • The timeline that changes everything • Why the “lone actor” story keeps falling apart • How planning complexity exposes outside help
Watch to the end — the timeline makes it impossible to ignore.
Transcript
Whoop. Let's get into it. Coach Colin here. What's going on? Happy holidays. Merry Christmas. New year is approaching. I can't wait for it. Honestly, I'm not one of those people that's like 26 is going to be my year. I I don't say stuff like that, but I'm definitely going to get a piece of it. It's not all mine. It's yours, too. But I'm going to I'm going to get a little some, you know. Anyway, let's jump into this. There is somebody who is high in the military, um, very highly skilled, very highly decorated, who actually believes what Candace Owens is saying about how she talked about this being a military hit, what happened to Charlie Kirk. He actually believes the same thing. And he thinks it's silly for anyone to think anything else. He's pretty for sure about this. I'm going to show you Candace. I'm going to show you him talk about a little more and then I'm going to walk through a timeline. Okay? Now, this is a timeline that we've all heard before because, you know, we said Tyler only had 24 hours to prepare. Then it became like, no, no, August 27th, he had loads of time to prepare. But there have been some things revealed that show he did not have that much time to prepare. And for me, it makes me think that someone had to have helped. Someone had to have known the name of the courtyard. But we're going to get into that in a second. Let's start off with Candace. But I want to tell you that I maintain I actually believe that this was a military hit that involved foreign actors and also literal actors. I believe that that day ran uh something akin to JFK's assassin. I believe that there were therefore multiple decoys on the ground. I do not believe, just so I'm clear here, that the person who was walking up the stairs killed Charlie. In fact, my suspicion is that that photo was not even shot on the same day. I do not believe that the person who ran across Loi rooftop killed Charlie. I think it was another decoy. I do not believe that shot came from a Losi center at all. And I obviously we all know that decoy George Zinn didn't kill Charlie. And I received an interesting tip about him as well that he's much more connected than what meets the surface. He potentially has connections to the federal department, familial connections to the federal department. And we are proddding that. It's getting interesting. Anyway, uh that would suggest that there are thus four a total of four decoys like George Zinn, staircase guy, maroon shirt guy, and loy center guy. None of which I believe actually pulled the trigger. Call it a hunch. I think it's much more likely that Lance Twigs is the one that is walking in that maroon shirt. His build is nothing like Tyler Robinson's build. Uh Lance Twigs is thinner. Uh and obviously I'm speculating here, but I believe Tyler Robinson was involved and he was in fact driving around campus on that day, therefore assisting in the costume changes, likely picking up clothing. And as we broke the story, uh Tyler was seen at Dairy Queen and what was he seen doing? As I told you, dumping clothing in the cemetery beside that Dairy Queen. So I think that is what his involvement is limited to. That was his job. Uh to get rid of clothing. Uh it's completely a nonsense to think that a person who had never killed anyone was high on adrenaline after a kill and decided to eat Dairy Queen. That doesn't even make sense. Biologically speaking, there was going to be an adrenaline measure that kicks in after you kill a animal, yet alone a person, yet alone having it be your first kill. And you're like, he just decided to go to DQ, sit down, write some poetic text messages. It's why they are freaking out about that Dairy Queen leak because it disrupts their narrative. One of many things that disrupts their narrative. But what about Lance Twigs? You know, I often wonder about that because that guy I I said it in an episode early on when I was covering this. It's really odd that that guy's like protected and gone. And I think when they do the court hearings and they say that there's things that they can't talk about, I feel like they're talking about Lance. I think he's some kind of informant, something of that nature. Because informants have been known to have people do things like actually walk up to a person, suggest doing something to that person, convince them to do it, and then that person goes and does it, and then that person goes to jail, and like that's them being like, "Yeah, we did some solid work here today." That's a that that happens a bunch, and people have gone to jail for decades because of stuff like that. So, I only say that because, you know, who knows? Maybe that's uh that's what Lance's job was. We still don't know much about Lance. We know that he was a little wacky, but not we don't know much past that. Now, we're going to get into Mike Glover. Mike Glover is just pointing out the the the Fed slop narrative, and he's just kind of showing how, you know, there's various points that don't make any sense. Candace kind of touched on it as well. the adrenaline, the going to Dairy Queen to write the text messages. Like, a lot of this doesn't make any sense at all. Um, you know, and they've tried to explain it away. I don't know if you remember early on, they tried to explain it away through being on Joe Rogan's podcast, Danny Jones podcast. They had uh Anna Paulina Luna on and she was like, "Oh, well, you know, he's just nuts. That's that's why he was able to just sit down and, you know, have Dairy Queen after. you know, this textbook like it was like what? Like that's not true. Like there's no proof of that. None of us have proof of that. That he was nuts, you know? Uh yeah, if he did this, yes, he's nuts to a degree, but like there's no proof that he's just like this calm, cool, collected operator whatsoever. As far as we all know, and even the official narrative goes with this, he was just a kid who decided to do this and that's it. That would mean that he wouldn't have this calm, cool demeanor. it would mean that he would have this crazy amount of adrenaline and he wouldn't be able to handle it because I could only imagine you know you know Valhalla VFT he talked about one time about how when he was covering what happened to Charlie and the people working on them and he was talking about how he had to he's had to stick his fingers like in into wounds and things like that and how no matter what how many times he's done it he always comes away like shaking and I like that's a common experience Adrenaline is adrenaline. It's like it doesn't uh it doesn't wear off with with anybody really. But let's jump into this and hear what he has to say. Hit the like button, hit the notification button, and please hit that subscribe button if you haven't already. Let's get back to the episode and the videos that we've seen. And just just from a sniper perspective, kind of what is your take overall of of the entire thing? A lot of it stinks and I I don't like it. Um, there are technical things that 100% I could speak from a position of expertise and authority as a sniper, but overall the entire thing doesn't technically meet any of my evaluations of what an organized hit would look like. pinning it on one man who grew up hunting a little bit, who had little to no exposure to guns and grew up in a conservative home. Like it it just doesn't make any sense. And there's many components to that, but for him, like everybody's like, "It's an easy shot. Got it." Yeah. Shooting a watermelon off of a fence post is an easy shot. Shooting a man under a tent in front of thousands of people knowing that you could get shot and killed yourself compromised even for trained operators is a lot of pressure. Not that we couldn't work through that pressure because we do that but for a civilian with no understanding of stress inoculation of training methodology planning sequences to be able to execute that alone. um seems off to me. Is there to play devil's advocate cuz that's my my jam. Is there any element of young, naive, almost too dumb? I mean, it's kind of like going through Buds at 18. It's like you're almost kind of too dumb to even understand what you've gotten yourself into. Do you think that there's any element of that that's even possible that like it just didn't even register that what he was doing was so profoundly significant historically and and evil and and and what have you that it was just in not impulsive because obviously there's a a level of planning that needs to take place but just from a a mindset standpoint that that that could possibly be a factor. Yeah, for sure. But even in the analogy you used um in buds, you don't have to be super technical. You just need to survive, right? You need to get through it. When you when you look at this situation, even breaking it down into an OP and just take cut out planning, just do infill actions on and Xfill to flawlessly infill, flawlessly execute, and flawlessly Xfill without compromise. and only to be like if that happened, which it happened allegedly, and then to throw it and piss it all away by throwing the rifle in the woods seems like a contradiction, an oxymoron. Like, why would you go through all the work of apparently planning and then perfectly infilling actions on and then next filling only to chuck a rifle to be seen off the side of the road? Now, do I think he's a psychopath? For sure. Um, it typically takes that kind of personality to be unaffected. You either have to be a train operator or a psychopath or both. Or both. It's a blurry line there to uh effectively pull something off like that. But I also think um for people to operate like that in their own little world without help. Um, and you could take the Trump assassination, attempted Trump's assassination as well as an example would be super unlikely. I mean, the biggest controversy is obviously the JFK assassination. To think that Oswald alone was a lone gunman with no help and coordination after he travels to Russia. Like what? Like, so that's what he had to say there. Very interesting stuff. Uh, Mike Glover, great guy. uh you know, also has a I don't I wouldn't say a troubled past, but uh he's definitely uh walks to the beat of his own drum. I'll say that. But everything he said just now makes perfect sense. How would you be able to do that? You're you're just just imagine just a like anybody who's like a hunter out there like just imagine like you're pulling that off. It's it's completely different when it's that type of situation. Like I have friends that do like a lot of I have a bunch of friends that do like a lot of tactical stuff and you know you do it over and over again. That way when the real situation pops up, you know, it's just like practicing boxing. It's like you're doing it so the muscle memory kicks in. So that way when you do have to use it, it's just like it's all there. You just you know what to do. It's just like that. You don't have that muscle memory at all. And again, we're going to get to the timeline because the timeline makes it I mean, just crystal clear. I mean, we we'll talk about that in a second. Let's jump over to this next one. And or do you think uh there was foreign involvement? I don't know if you've followed up with any of the stuff that Candace Owens has been putting out. Yeah, I do. Of late about potentially some some French connection or or that there was a foreign connection of some sort. What do you think happened? Do you have a theory? My theory is he was the shooter, but there's a lot more involvement, including foreign adversaries. I look for people to write off the idea that there is no foreign influence at all in this particular case does not understand history or the world we live in today. Having worked for the CIA, having worked for Special Operations Command at senior positions, briefing generals and deputy directors of the agency and a lot of influential politicians, being a person who advocated for the military's position in Libya, in Benghazi, and talking to members of Congress in investigations of all this, a whistleblower or myself blacked out on Fox News post Benghazi saying that the military could have responded with Adam Hley. 100% foreign influence is likely the framework of how these things happen. Whether it was the Trump attempted assassination or our um assassination in Utah that killed Charlie Kirk, it's likely the case that there was some foreign influence in some way. Was it an asset that was inside the chat groups that he was in who recruited him, influenced him, and then pushed him to do it, who offered him material support? I that's my theory. I I think that's what happened. And and people would say, "Well, that's not the Twitter just unlocked the ability for you to see where the accounts and the tweets are coming from." And would it surprise you that a lot of the vicious, toxic. They're all coming from different countries. Some of the top top accounts that are like, you know, almost a million followers, they're they're all from different countries. It's it's uh pretty crazy to see, actually. Um so there you have it. He definitely agrees with what Candace Owens is saying. Now, obviously, it differs a little bit because he thinks Tyler was actually the person who did this. Now, I'm kind of in between because when I show you this timeline, there's no way that he planned this on his own. There's just no way. Okay, so we're going to break that down. So, here's the timeline of everything that happened from August 27th all the way to the day uh Charlie passed away. So, on October 27th, uh Turning Point publicly announced that Charlie Kirk Where's my Where's my browser? No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. There you go. Uh, that Charlie Kirk would be speaking at UVU on September 10th, making this the first official announcement. Now, you might be thinking, well, there you go. He has all this time to plan. No, not really. The announcement listed the location as the UVU courtyard without naming a building, area, or specific courtyard. Since the announcement, the common assumption has been Tyler Robinson had plenty of time starting from a August 27th to plan what he did to Charlie. Right. Immediately, a major problem appears in that assumption. There is no official name named location at UVU uh called UVU courtyard. UVU has a large campus with multiple different courtyards, not just one. Now, we keep going. Uh UVU has a small and simp or simple CA uh campus. Oh, sorry. It's not a small or simple campus. It contains more than one courtyard spread across the their grounds. Uh none of the courtyards are officially or formally named UVU courtyard. This creates a basic but critical problem. If Tyler Robinson was planning to do this, which courtyard was he planning for specifically, right? And think about that that that right away, you know, maybe you're starting to realize what what what we're talking about here. Uh this leads to the central question driving the entire analyst. Uh how could someone plan a detailed coordinated effort without knowing the exact location of the event? You have to know because where are you going to take the shot from? You have to know. So, uh, Turning Point and Gary from Paramount Tactical have publicly stated Robinson had advanced notice of the event. The location was known early enough to plan. Now, they actually said this when um, Candace was talking with Erica and they decided to do a live stream anyway, even though they said they wouldn't. And this is the type of things that they were talking about. Just a lot of slop. This explanation has become the dominant public narrative surrounding the case. That narrative needs to be examined carefully step by step. Robinson's alleged statement before the shooting. Now, let's get into that a little bit. In an alleged conversation before the shooting, Robinson mentioned Charlie Kirk would be speaking at UVU. He referenced he he referred to UVU as a stupid venue. He accused Charlie Kirk of spreading hate. When examining the physical layout of the campus, rooftop access near the event the eventual crime scene appears relatively easy. Okay. And that's that's true when you look at actually, you know, it's actually not true. When you look at where the shot was taken from and where Charlie was, it's like sure that's easy. Like like Mike said, he's like it's easy when you're just like chilling. You know, you're in your backyard and you're hitting a watermelon from however far away. But it's it's a different thing when adrenaline kicks in. Uh it's kind of like this. There's a lot of people who can just talk. It It changes drastically when all a sudden the camera light goes on and you know that you're probably talking to, you know, four million people a month. It it changes. It It gets really It gets wonky your first few times. When examining the physical layout of the campus rooftop access near the eventual crime scene easy read that this suggests Robinson may have noticed the rooftop access, considered using it as part of the plan. However, this observation alone does not solve the location confusion. Now, as we're going to keep going here, okay, a uh a claim circulated early on that Turning Point advertised the event a few days before it happened. This would imply Robinson had very little uh very limited time for planning. That claim does not match what is publicly available. Turning Pointed the event as early as a uh August 27th. their website, Twitter, Facebook, all listed the date of the event, but they labeled it UVU courtyard. Now, again, there's two courtyards, just so you know. You know, little spoiler alert here. Um, this gives more than 10 days of advanced notice. This timeline matches UVU state filings and the bureau's charging documents. Okay. So now with very little research, it became very clear UVU has at least two major courtyards, not just one, right? So right away, you know, I'm going to read this, but that means he would have to make two plans. That means he'd be planning things twice, right? He would have to be like, there's this courtyard and I'll set up here and there's this courtyard and I'll set up here. He would have to plan that out. He'd also have to know where Charlie would be. He would have to know where the tent was set up. That would be pretty rough with unless you had some kind of help, you know, going towards Mike Glover's theory and Candace's theory that he was not the only person involved. Uh then October, sorry, August 21st, event confirmation documents attained through uh record request shows that the correct venue name was the student center courtyard. It is known as the center campus courtyard or fountain courtyard. Despite this turning point later shortened the name to simply UVU courtyard. So that's very weird that they did this. Uh this simplification likely intro in uh introduced confusion about the actual location. Now let's keep going here. One of UVU's courtyards is the library courtyard which is large open grassy area, easy to access, close to parking nearby buildings. From an event planning standpoint, it would make sense as this was the venue. It would make sense as a venue for Charlie Kirk event. Okay. Uh aerial views show clear entry points, uh logical crowd flow, practical access for both attendees and security. Okay, so let's keep going. If there were two possible courtyards, Robinson would have needed two different plans, two different rooftops, two different access points, two different camera avoidance strategies, two different parking and escape routes. All of which is true. He would have to know where he's going to be going. Okay, if it's here, I'm going to be doing this. If it's here, I'm going to be doing this. That is not what a How old is he? I'll just say young young kid. Young kid in their 20s. That's not what they know how to do. That's that's technical. That gets into operator mode. You know, that's why I like that uh Mike Glover uses that term. You know, that's what an operator would have to deal with. Yeah. And that would be nothing for them to deal with. But some kid some kid who's getting down with furry and stuff like that. I don't know, man. Kind of weird. This would dramatically increase complexity. Robinson's alleged movements were already intricate. planning for two locations would make it far more difficult and uh yeah 100% it would make it more difficult. Now there are only two realistic explanations. Robinson did not realize that there was more than one courtyard and got extremely lucky which I don't believe at all. Could you imagine? Can you imagine? He just planned for that one place and that happened to be where Charlie was. He planned for where that tent was going to be. It just happened to be exactly where Charlie was. you know, like come on. And it was just that perfect angle. It's going to go right over the crowd. Just perfect. Charlie's up on a chair on a box. Like everything just works out so perfectly. Or he knew ahead of time that the event would be at the Fountain Courtyard. The problem with the second option, the exact location was not publicly released until September 9th. And this is what I was talking about before. If you guys have been watching me throughout this arc, throughout this saga of covering this this investigation, I talked about how the timeline they had 24 hours. They they did not have a lot of time uh in order to do this whole thing. And this is why because the name of the courtyard, the proper name of the courtyard was not given out until September 9th. Now, if Robinson uh conducted early in-person reconnaissance, uh he should appear on uh security footage, his movement should be visible around library courtyard. Now, this is actually interesting because I just did an episode the other day about how um the dude who removed the SD cards had a had a brother-in-law who was Tyler's defense lawyer and they had to get rid of him because of that conflict of interest, but he was on the case for like 3 months, maybe even longer. One of the things they did request was security footage. Now, I wonder if they requested that because Tyler's like, "I'm not on the footage." Like, "Show me the footage." Because why would they? And here's the thing. His defense could be working against him. Like, that that is a thing. I mean, but, you know, if they look at that footage and he's not there, it's like it's I I don't know where that goes. I I don't know what that looks like, right? It sounds like it's bad. Like if I was if I was a lawyer and I was prosecuting someone and the footage of the security footage doesn't show him walking around, I'd be like, "Well, I'm kind of screwed, aren't I?" Uh, available movement data shows on the day of the shooting. Uh, he never went near the library courtyard. This again suggests either extraordinary luck or prior knowledge that was not public publicly available. Now, this is where I'm going towards. Someone had to have given him this knowledge. Now, who knew about this? You could say anyone from Turning Point. For sure, the event planners knew. That's Mikey McCoy's wife and another person. For sure they knew. Um, and then, you know, if Mikey McCoy's wife knows, then probably Mikey knows. Uh, probably Rob McCoy knows. Um, I would think Blake knows cuz and here they're all on the way there. So, they all know where they're going. Now, do they tip him off while they're all on the way there? Probably not. They they they have the the they have the information beforehand. Now, is it Turning Point that tips him off? Maybe not. But maybe so. I mean, it's so hard as you look into Turning Point because they really do have so many Intel connections. They really do. It's not made up. It's not It's not crazy. There's pure receipts for it. You see it all the time from Rob McCoy, his father, Mikey McCoy, Blake. Even Andrew, I believe, has family that is enlisted. So, it's like it's just everybody around him has this connection. And I don't know anything about his father or mother or anything like that, but you know, for the most part, his inner circle is all connected in that way, and they all have that information. So, August 27th, uh, Turning Point makes the first announcement. August 30th, uh, the Salt Lake City Tribune reports Charlie Kirk is coming to UVU, USU. No specific courtyard is named. Now, this is something that a lot of you were trying to warn me about when I made my timeline, but again, nothing was named. That's why I just went with the whole fact it was 24 hours. They didn't name it until 24 hours before September 7th or sorry, September 2nd. Uh, major update KUV Channel 2 reports Charlie will be at UVU on September 10th. Uses the term UVU courtyard. Okay, so again, they're not being specific. The specific courtyard is still not identified. And then we move over here. uh charging documents released on September 16th state Robinson said he had been planning for a little bit over a week and that was inside of those text messages between him and Lance. Since the the whole thing occurred on September 10th, planning likely began or began around September 2nd. How could he possibly have the information necessary to do this planning? Right. Okay. This does not match claims of the full 2 weeks. It aligns more closely with uh 8 to n days. September 4th, Turning Point local chapter posts. On September 4th, they say Turning Point Beehive uh Turning Point Beehive posts that Charlie Kirk is coming to UVU. And again, they do not name the courtyard, right? The location remains unclear to the public. September 9th. On the afternoon of September 9th, the afternoon UVU Review posts the exact location. So that is the amount of time that he had. And I'll be generous and say afternoon is 3:00. So from 3:00 to when that happened to Charlie, which was around 12:30, 12 to 12:30, he had that much time to plan out everything. how he was gonna go, where Charlie was gonna be, taking the actual shot, figuring out to run. And again, like I've seen what the roof looks like. It makes no sense to run, to run, and jump off the roof. It makes way more sense to run, jump over the little railing, and go back to the stairs that he went up to get there. Makes way more sense cuz then you disappear. You're a ghost. You're jumping off a roof. People are going to notice a dude jumping off a roof. People won't think twice about a dude just running down the stairs and you can't even see when you go down that stairwell and then he would have been in a tunnel. He would have been gone. Would have made way more sense, way more. But that's not what he did. And again, Mike Glover actually did say that. He goes, "Why would why would you throw it all away? You had this intense planning. You threw it all away. It's just as soon as a shot rang out." You could say it's adrenaline, maybe. I don't know. Adrenaline wore off by the time you got to Dairy Queen, though. You know what I mean? A Sunday made him calm down. He He got a Sunday and he was just like, "Okay, okay. Uh, can I have extra sauce?" Yes, chocolate sauce. Thank you so much. I have to message my lover. Can you bring it to my table? I have a lover that I must message about some things that I've done recently. My love. That's what he started doing. That's the official narrative. I didn't make that up. That's not me. Sounds funny, huh? Sounds real funny. The local TP chapter posts a video with the walking directions. a specific route through the uh soren center. Uh this is the first time the location becomes fully aware or fully clear. Okay, so now we come down here. We're almost done this timeline now. I know it's quite a bit, but I just I just want to paint the picture so you guys actually understand. I remember so many people emailed me and they're like, "No, no, no. It it said it here. It said it here." It's like, "No, no, it actually didn't didn't say it specifically." Right. Uh, Channel 5 publishes a story. Charlie Kirk is coming the next day. Courtyard is still not mentioned. Local media coverage on September 9th is heavy and widespread. September 10th, it happens. Charlie passes away on the 10th at around 12 to 12:30. Uh the first day after the public finally knew the exact location, September 12th, student clarified um the UVU, sorry, the Utah Board of Higher Education states Robinson was a USU student, not a UVU student. Uh this raises an important question. Why assume familiarity with UVU at all? Right? Uh and then let's just keep going. Most people are not familiar with campuses they've never attended. So again, he would just have no idea. Uh Robinson allegedly had two possible targets. Uh UVU unfamiliar campus, short timeline, or USU, familiar campus, more time. Uh choosing UVU adds more uncertainty, more complexity. That choice stands out. And then we get down here. Uh the Utah prosecutor uh plan uh confirms Robinson planned the attack for a little over a week. So this is the reports that are coming out. Again, impossible. Impossible without inside information. Imp am I saying that right? Impossible. Okay, this reinforces the compressed timeline. Now, there was a request for the paving. Now, you remember this uh somebody named, I believe it was Jack Camelot, uh I think that's his name on X, he did a request for what UVU was doing in regards to the construction. He wanted to know if it was planned or if it was not planned. Now, what they said, this is what UVU said, because he said he wanted to know about construction at the courtyard. UVU said, just in case you're like, "Oh, what do you mean the courtyard? That makes sense." UVU themselves said the term courtyard is not specific enough. The university has multiple courtyards across multiple campuses. They could not identify which courtyard he meant. So they didn't give him uh his request because he had to be more specific. Uh so even UVU says that's not enough. And this confirms the ambiguous even to blah blah blah. And let's just jump over here now. So, that's where we're at with this. There's no way, no way possible that he was able to do that on his own. Candice thinks foreign uh foreign actors alongside with domestic. Okay. Mike Glover, who is an expert in this type of thing. I mean, when you have you ever looked into the training that Green Berets go through? Like, there's some pretty wild training. There's there's actually some training that they do where they have to secretly go into a town and it's like a mock town. Like the the town's people know what's going on, but they have to go into this town and like secretly navigate through it all. They're trained in some pretty highlevel stuff. Like 50 of them, and this is this is this is real. 50 of them could go to a country, learn different languages, take girlfriends, take different identities, and slowly uh change whoever is uh running the government. Like that's a thing that they do. That's like a real thing. I've looked into it quite a bit. Someone could correct me. I'm I'm not being that specific about it, but yeah, they're they're very highly trained. So even he says that there's no way that it was just him. There's no way. I mean, there you have it. So, what's really going on with Tyler? What's really happening? And how come how come this is not coming up in the cases, right? How come the defense hasn't brought this up? Like, imagine if the defense said this. Well, again, maybe the defense won't say this because then it implicates somebody else. Maybe that other person who would be implicated or other people who would be implicated, maybe that's a no-go and maybe that's why Tyler is the one sitting on the chopping block, so to speak. I really do think that as this goes on, because it's not going to be until late or sorry, early 2027. That's what Erica said, right? Erica never lies. Um, she doesn't she doesn't. Don't laugh. uh early 2027. I think from this time to that time, I think we see some developments with Tyler. That's that's that's me trying to speak as PG as possible. I think there will be develops developments with him. I think uh I think they can't have this guy go to the stand. He's going to implicate somebody else. He just is for sure he is. He has to. He has to. Nothing else makes sense to me. Anyways, guys, I just wanted to bring you all that uh you know, happy holidays, all that good stuff. Hope your Christmas was magnificent. Hope uh hope you uh had family with you. And if you didn't, I hope you had podcasts with you. I hope you had uh old Christmas shows with you. Some Rudolph, some you know, you know those old ones. Some Charlie Brown Christmas. You younger. You get younger guys don't even know. You don't even know about the one I'm talking about. But now when I say that, the older people, they picture it clearly. They know the Charlie Brown one. La. They know exactly what I'm talking about. Anyways, guys, just wanted to bring that to you. I'm out of here.
https://x.com/AdameMedia/status/1999196464417739067 https://x.com/AdameMedia/status/1999196 ... 67/photo/1 ADAM @AdameMedia BREAKING: A photo has emerged of Erika Kirk with Benjamin Netanyahu's son, Yair Netyanahu, in 2019 in Israel.
Now she’s talking Hebrew on daytime TV, attacking Candace Owens and defending TPUSA who have been caught lying.
She’s in on it. She was Charlie’s handler.
Tyler Bowyer is with Erika Frantzve June 11, 2019 Introducing the Arizonana Israel Public Affairs Committee!! Happy to welcome Yair Netanyahu to State 48!
**************************
Emerson Drive - She's My Kind of Crazy - Official Music Video Emerson Drive Jul 22, 2012
Here's the official music video for "She My Kind Of Crazy". The video was shot in Las Vegas on top of a double decker bus. Good times! Enjoy!!! / emersondrive
Erika Kirk Linked to Controversial Family Allegations │ Fans Divided .....Celebrity Gossip Celebrity Gossip Files Dec 27, 2025
59/Erika Kirk Linked to Controversial Family Allegations │ Fans Divided .....Celebrity Gossip
This video reviews emerging claims about Erica Kirk discussed in celebrity gossip, reflecting current celebrity gossip narratives. We summarize what independent researchers allege and why celebrity gossip has revisited possible connections within celebrity gossip circles. Rather than conclusions, the focus is context and sourcing, showing how celebrity gossip develops as information accumulates. Viewers are encouraged to assess evidence carefully as celebrity gossip evolves, celebrity gossip remains debated, and celebrity gossip conversations continue.
Transcript
Boy, you take one little peek behind the curtain in Erica Kirk and it all stinks. From her reality TV shows to her lying about not drinking to her lying about not dating to the story about how she got hooked up with Charlie to everything. It seems Erica Kirk has started to buckle up because around her increasingly shady connections are emerging and among them are names that cannot be ignored. According to information shared by a close friend of the show directed by James Lee based on supposedly reliable sources, independent researchers and citizen journalists have traced and uncovered suspicious links. Specifically, Erica is believed to have connections to two powerful mafia families. The Rothstein family through her cousin Nicole and the Solomon's family through her aunt Carla. These connections, if verified, are not merely social acquaintances or coincidences. They raise a larger, more serious question. Who is Erica Kirk really? And is she an asset being used in these behindthe-scenes power networks? Remarkably, this question, once considered mere speculation, now seems to be piecing together more and more pieces. Each day brings new information that makes the picture clearer, but also more worrying. And that is precisely what James Lee has said. Not to conclude, but to warn that the story is far from over and what we know may only be the tip of the iceberg with her roommate at the time, Nicole Rostine. Merry Thanksgiving to you. Merry Thanksgiving to you. Merry Thanksgiving to you. And Nicole, by the way, can you do that? Can Can anybody woo like that? I'm too I can Woo. That's as loud as I can get. Excellent. But here, I really have to pause. And let's not forget one crucial detail. Erica Kirk's husband only recently passed away. Yet in that context, Erica chose to openly talk about very specific things, including the moment she mentioned the Shabbat shalom greeting she received and how she responded. She said, quoted verbatim, "As her cousin, a completely Jewish person, half her family is Jewish. Although I myself am a Christian, I have celebrated many Jewish holidays with her family and have always had a deep respect for the Jewish religion." She ended with a single word, shalom. And then things start to get more interesting when we look at the name mentioned and handle Nicole Roststein. And the Rostines, I'm just going to add, is a pretty famous crime family in American history. The Rothstein family, or Rost, depending on how you spell it, is not a typical neighborhood family in history books. If you ever look up the 1919 World Baseball Championship, you'll see on paper that the Cincinnati Reds won. No asterisks, no annotations. But the numbers tell a completely different story. The story of the Chicago White Socks, also known as the Black Socks. The team was found to have accepted money to intentionally lose the game. And the name behind that affair was Arnold Rothstein. Arnold Rothstein, nicknamed the brain, was an American racketeer, crime boss, businessman, and gambler who became a kingpin of the Jewish mob in New York City. Rothstein was widely reputed to have organized corruption in professional athletics, including conspiring to fix the 1919 World Series. He was also a mentor of future crime bosses Lucky Luchiano, Mayor Lansky, Frank Costello, Bugsby, Seagull, and numerous others. men who shaped an entire era of American organized crime. A fascinating family from a historical perspective, but also a family that raises questions as these names unexpectedly appear in a modern story revolving around a woman known to the public as America's model girl next door. And it is here that the lines between past and present begin to blur. Not to assert anything, but to remind us that history never simply disappears. It just waits for the right moment to return. Wow. What do you make of that? Well, you take one little peek behind the curtain and Erica Kirk and it all stinks. from her reality TV shows to her lying about not drinking to her lying about not dating to all the story about how she got hooked up with Charlie to everything and you know it's just weird. Also, Charlie was all about traditional roles and that the wife should stay home with the kids and now she's the CEO of a huge corporation. When is she going to have time for her kids? Charlie Kirk repeatedly expressed his deep respect for traditional family values and roles. In that view, the ideal wife was someone who would spend most of her time at home caring for and raising the children. Therefore, Erica Kirk's later becoming CEO of a large organization with a demanding schedule and immense responsibilities raised many questions. A very common yet sensitive question. When would she have time for her children? And if Charlie were still alive, would he truly approve of that new role? Personally, I'm not sure. Perhaps Charlie would have had his own concerns, but ultimately, who am I to say that? These are just thoughts stemming from what he publicly shared while he was alive. However, the story doesn't end there. Looking back at the timeline, a historically contextual detail begins to draw attention. Around 95, Erica Kirk's uncle, Jack Solomon, a Jewish man, was listed as a board member of the New Jewish Studies Center at Utah Valley University, then known as Utah Valley State College. Hearing this, many might react, "Wait, is this true?" According to publicly available documents, the center's goal was to build academic and cultural bridges between the Jewish and Mormon communities and to promote understanding of the relationships related to Israel. On paper, it was an educational initiative and religious dialogue, completely legal and transparent. What caught public attention wasn't the center itself, but the interplay of timelines, relationships, and locations. Because many years later, the name Charlie Kirk became associated with a serious incident that occurred at this very school. An event that shocked public opinion and left many unanswered questions. Here, it's important to emphasize one thing. There are no assertions, no conclusions. They are simply parallel events existing within the same historical context. But for many who followed the story, these coincidences caused them to pause, think, and wonder were things as simple as they were told. And sometimes in big stories, what puzzles people most isn't what's said, but what's quickly glossed over. And then recent events involving Erica Kirk have left many stunned. After all, her husband had only just passed away. The loss was still very recent. But what truly baffled the public was what they witnessed afterward. Look at how she appeared. Look at how she spoke, how she walked onto the stage, how she stood before the cameras. For many, that moment didn't resemble someone grieving, but rather a meticulously prepared performance, confident, powerful, and completely controlled. Some audience members even exclaimed that it felt more like the moment of victory than that of someone who had just experienced profound loss. And then from those observations, another hypothesis began to be increasingly mentioned in public discussions. Many people suggested that the marriage between Erica Kirk and Charlie Kirk wasn't entirely the result of a game of chance, but may have been premeditated and arranged. This, of course, isn't a conclusion, but a question that is spreading. Those raising the question point out that looking back at the entire timeline, everything seems to have unfolded too smoothly, too perfectly. The meeting, the quick connection, the pre-established image, and then there was the marriage that came at the right time, in the right context, at the right moment, when Charlie's role, position, and influence were at their peak. For them, the question isn't whether the feelings were genuine or fake, but whether the marriage served larger purposes. Some argue that in the world of power, media, and politics, personal relationships sometimes go beyond mere privacy, becoming part of image strategy, influence strategy, or even narrative control. Others emphasize Erica's presence alongside Charlie, not just as a wife, but as a key figure, always present at crucial moments. From public events and speeches to how the family story was told to the media, every detail was meticulously scrutinized, dissected, and compared. Of course, it's important to clarify. There's no concrete evidence to support this claim. But the lack of clear explanation coupled with the rapid changes following Charlie's death has allowed this theory to persist and spread. For some, that feeling is like searching for the answer in a game of chess, where certain moves only truly become meaningful after the most important player has left the board. And then what was once considered accidental begins to be viewed in a different light. Up to this point, it remains just a question. But in stories like this, one understands that a question repeated long enough carries its own weight. Not because it has been proven, but because it is true in the gaps that have never been filled. And it is those gaps, not accusations, that keep us watching, keep us questioning, and keep us waiting for a more complete picture. What about you? What do you think about the controversial connections surrounding Erica Kirk's family? Are they just historical coincidences, or are there still unresolved issues? Leave your thoughts in the comments. I read and follow your comments. And if you want to continue following me in more in-depth analyses, unfinished stories, and unresolved details, don't forget to subscribe to the channel so you don't miss the next videos. Thank you so much for staying until the end of the video.
Candace Owens CALLS OUT TPUSA Alibi by Sabby Sabs Dec 28, 2025
Transcript
[Music] Something damning just happened with this Fort Wuka story. It is getting crazy out here in these streets. You guys have got to hear this. Apparently, it looks like Candace Owens may have caught Andrew Kovit and Erica Kirk trying to manipulate things behind the scenes about this interview that she had uh with the gentleman named uh Mitch who there's a lot of attacks happening out there right now. I do want to say like once again, she brought him on the show. He told her that he believed that he saw uh Brian, Erica, and uh Congressman uh Almida at Fort Wuka on September 8th. That date is important because now apparently Andrew Kovit during a live stream is got his hand in the cookie jar as she said it. We're going to show you in just a second, but apparently it looks like he was trying to tell a YouTuber what to say about where Erica's whereabouts were for that day. And it could just be that Mitch was wrong. Maybe he did not see Erica. Maybe he thought he saw her. But the way that Turning Point USA is behaving about this only makes people scratch their heads more and question their transparency. So again, part of the reason why people are asking these questions is because the FBI was not transparent. TPUSA has not been transparent about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. But it's getting to be much messier than that. Ladies and gentlemen, I told you early on that I did not believe that Erica was the saint that people were making her out to be. When I said this early on, I was like, I don't know, something really suspect about her. And I will looked into her past and I was like, uh oh, this is not good. People were not too happy with me when I said that early on, but as time has gone by, I think more people are starting to see there is something that is not right here. Let's go ahead and get into this clip here. Project Constitution has been on it. Erica Kirk's alibi just got completely destroyed. Listen to what she actually said to Jesse Waters in her own Jesse Waters interview. Erica admits Charlie was at the office all day on September 9th. Let's go ahead and get into this video here. Let me make this a little bit bigger for you guys. Tell me about the day before the shooting. He was at the office and we were going to meet for dinner beforehand with a dear friend of ours who I wanted to just be with us and pray with us before the event. It's no hidden secret that stuff on campus is heating up. You see people on campus coming on with guns prior to the event that happened with Charlie the assassination. So, did everybody hear what she said? She said he was at the office all day. Not we. He Let's continue with Charlie. And so I know that you know you and I even even talked about how I used to say, you know, Charlie, have you ever thought about wearing a vest? He would nod to that and be like, "You know, I've looked into it." But he would always say, "If they're going to get me, they're going to get me." He wasn't afraid. It wouldn't have mattered anyways if you wore a vest. Erica's mom was dealing with a medical issue, so she stayed in Phoenix to care for her. Okay, hold on to that part. Her mom was dealing with a medical issue, so she stayed in Phoenix to care for her. Okay, so everybody remember all that because now this story isn't making sense. And if people thought the Fort uh Wuka story didn't make sense, well, now this just makes it look even more suspicious. This is what I was saying. They're not being transparent. Let's go back up uh to the top here cuz these are things people are calling out. Uh, so Project Constitution goes on to say, uh, quoting her words here and says she never once said she was with him. See, that's the big key. He was at the office that day all day, but she didn't say she was with him. Let's continue on. They were supposed to meet up for dinner with a friend, yada yada. Her mom had medical issues, so she stayed in Phoenix to care for her. Charlie came home alone that night. Their daughter Gigi woke up and slept in the master bed with Erica. So Erica told Charlie to go sleep in Gigi's room for a better night's rest. Separate beds, separate rooms. She didn't even see him the morning of September 10th. So let's go back to that video because and I'm going to show you what Candace is saying now. Tell me about the day before the about how I used to say if they're going to get me, they're going to get me. He wasn't afraid. Wouldn't have mattered anyways if he were vest. Erica's mom was dealing with a medical issue, so she stayed in Phoenix to care for her. She planned to join Charlie at the next scheduled Turning Point event at Colorado State just a few days later. He was like, "Home needs you. Home needs you. Be home. Come with me on Thursday to the next event we have." And so for him that night, he was so excited. I mean, he just was like, I can't wait. It's going to be the best. And he got up around 2:45, 3ish to go into the kitchen to grab a snack. And our daughter had woke up that around that same time. We live in a small space. You can kind of hear when everyone's kind of shuffling around. And so she came into our room and she stayed in our bed. And he always loved when Gigi slept in our bed because she's, you know, little ones, they like curl up inside of you and like they're just nuzzled in and but she, you also know that it can be very acrobatic when a three-year-old is in your bed and somehow their feet end up on your face. So I said, "I want you to have a good night's sleep. Go ahead and sleep in her room and I'll turn the air down so it's nice and and cozy in there and um I just want you to get a good night's sleep so you can be amazing tomorrow." And so Gigi and I stayed in our room and that morning he woke up super early and he came into our bedroom into the bathroom cuz that's where his wedding ring was and his necklace and he came in and he grabbed that and then he left. So does anybody find it interesting um now looking back at this and I didn't think about it at that point in time. Anybody find it interesting that she said he was very excited about that that day's event uh the Utah Valley event. It's interesting to me because he had done so many other events, right? Like, and this is not to say that you wouldn't be excited anymore, but I don't know. This seems kind of weird considering he has spoken at so many colleges. And it's not like this was like a huge huge college or anything or a prominent college, but she says that he said that he was very very very excited. This is something I question because it's not like it was his first one. It not it's not like he had just started this. I question that. Now, let's go back. We go up to the top part uh here, ladies and gents. Andrew Kovette's metad data proof, which we're going to get into. That photo supposedly shows Erica having dinner with Charlie on September 9th, the exact day Erica herself says she wasn't with him all day, had to meet up if dinner happened, and slept in a completely different room. The photo covers zero of the critical window. September 8th that evening, the whistleblower sighting uh alleged sighting of Erica at Candlewood Suites on Fort Wuka leading into the mysterious September 9th early morning activity. Candace has been crystal clear. The key sighting was on September 8th with a followup on September 9th. Erica's own words leave September 8th wide open and cast massive doubt on September 9th. Why push a mismatch photo as definite proof? I'll show you the photo in just a second. Why the coordinated spin and straw man attacks? This isn't clarification. This is desperation. Yes. And that is exactly what I gathered from this as well. I felt as though this was a desperate attempt. Uh I'll show you the photo here. Um and Candace talks about this photo as well. Let me go ahead and make this bigger for you so you can see. This is the image that they're referring to. This is Erica's hand. And the date, which you'll see it closer up in just a second in the video, is September 9th. But it's worth saying, lol, Erica wasn't in some fort in Tucson. The internet has gone insane. She woke up next to Charlie, went to the office with Charlie all day, woke up, woke him up from a nap before a fox hit, went to dinner with Charlie. Literally, people are lunatics. This doesn't make any sense because it says right here, um, where are we here? She woke up next to Charlie, went to the office with Charlie all day, woke him up from a nap before a fox hit. Um, so again, the date that is in question is actually September 8th, not September 9th. The picture that she is sharing says September 9th. So what happened on September 8th? Also, this this also doesn't make sense. She woke up next to him. But in the interview with Jesse Waters, she said that he slept in her her daughter's room because she wanted him to have a good night's sleep, which means he did not wake up next to her. So, which one is it, Erica? This is why people are asking the questions that they're asking. Now, let's get into uh this part here as well. I want to show you a little bit larger because uh the picture Candace shows is larger. See where it says September 9th? So, this is what Erica was sharing. This is where I was on September 9th. But the date in question is September 8th. This is what Candace said here. Erica Kirk's Fort Wuka alibi. Andrew Kov is live texting with a YouTuber offering proof that Erica wasn't at some fort. He shares Erica's metadata claiming she had dinner with Charlie Kirk and therefore could not have been at Fort Wuka. only problem it's her metadata and schedule for September 9th. Andrew is being intentionally obtuse. He clearly understands the allegations made is that she was seen on September 8th. Why the intentional disinformation? Also, why not just simply texted to me rather than a random YouTuber? Why is everyone being so intentionally evasive about Fort Wuka? And this is why people are asking questions, right? So, that's a good question. Why didn't he just text that information to her? Why is he sharing this with a YouTuber? They didn't even do their due diligence and get the date right. And so, when people are like, "Oh, no. This is all conspiracy. You guys are ridiculous." When people say that, you need to look at the way that Turning Point USA is behaving and the way that Erica Kirk and them are behaving. It's really weird. out of everything that's been said, the one thing that they should have gotten right is the date. So now it looks even more suspicious because that's not the day in question. So Candace did release a video. Uh she's not live yet. Um probably still on break, but she did post a video. It looks like this might be on Instagram that was shared to Twitter cuz I guess she felt she needed to come out and say something with everything that's being h that's going on. Listen to this. Okay, I just have to jump on here to let you guys know that Andrew Kovette, the spokesperson for Turning Point USA, just got caught with his hand in the cookie jar trying to help orchestrate behind the scenes an alibi for Erica Kirk and Fort Wuga. Now, why is this crazy? For those that don't know the backstory here, essentially this guy Mitch, it was very compelling, said that he saw Brian Harpole leaving this meeting at Fort Wuka on September 9th. Now, I wanted to give him the platform after I verified where he was to tell his story, but he also had to include the part where he claims that he saw Erica Kirk the night before um also on Fort Wuka at Candlewood in and Suites. Okay. So, that would have been September 8th, the night before. Now, truthfully, I put it at 50/50 because like I said on my show, I believe that he was at this like this meeting was significant and that it concluded. I felt really strongly that he saw Brian Harpole, but what's his memory like? Are you good at remembering faces? Did you just see another blonde and think that it was Erica Kirk? Genuinely, I thought it was at like 50/50 until until tonight where all of a sudden there were all these attacks regarding Fort Wuka. We didn't really know where they were coming from. You got people calling me insane. Alex Jones jumps into the feray. I'm like, what is happening right now? Why Why does Fort Wuka have so many people triggered? Well, well, let me say this here. Didn't I tell you guys it was kind of weird how all these people were making these videos and there was like, oh, da da da da da da da. It was just kind of weird. Like Alex Jones, who obviously he said he knows Candace, he's I guess was friendly with her, he could have contacted her behind the scenes. This text message that was submitted by Andrew Kov, he could have sent that to Candace behind the scenes. Like a lot of these things could have happened like directly with her for people who have contact with her. And from what I understand, it appears Alex Jones did. So, it's kind of weird that instead you decide to make the videos and say, "Oh, no. Well, this is it was all in an effort to get her to stop talking, to take her down, right?" And you ain't got to agree. Let's say you don't agree with any of this. That's fine. That's your right. But it's the length that people are willing to go to to stop the conversation from happening in the first place. That's what's suspicious to me. Now, they got dates wrong. So, I don't know. I don't know what's going on here, but it doesn't answer the question about September 8th. It doesn't. And even if you don't believe that he did see her, I mean, we we may never know. To pretend that it's outlandish and it's ridiculous to even think that, given her history and background, I would say not. And I'll get to that in a second. Let's continue. There were these YouTubers, Paramount Tactical is one of them, who was basically teasing like, "We're going to take down Mitch and show you guys that he's not a credible witness witness by going back and going through the files of his marriages and ex relationships and to show you that he's an abuser and this is going to be the end of Candace Owens's career." Like, totally weird. Like, I never told my followers that they should go marry Mitch. I have no idea what he was doing 20 years ago in a relationship. There were no convictions against him that I could find. Whatever the point, so this was something that I I said as well I thought is really weird, which is that, okay, let's say those things are true, that he did abuse women. Does that mean he didn't think he saw the people he thought he saw on September 8th and on September 9th? Like, that's the problem. This is why I always push back as well when someone has been arrested and they start diving into their, oh, look, he smoked marijuana. Oh, he failed the ninth grade. This is why I've always pushed back against that when it's when you're using someone's character to assassinate uh their what they consider to be their truth at that point in time. So, because someone has a a bad history, meaning that let's say they've gotten in trouble before, right? Does that mean that they didn't see what they saw? Does that mean that that they have the right to be vilified? That they're not telling the truth about it like that. It's that type of behavior that I was trying to warn people about. So, my whole thing was when people said that they were coming out with information about Mitch, I was like, "Okay, well, they must have some information that's going to show that maybe he wasn't telling the truth about actually being there." That's what I thought. But no, the information that is produced is this guy used to abuse women and he was a domestic abuser and da da da. I'm like, okay, that's bad, but does that mean that he didn't see the people that he said he saw? So, we have to be very careful about blending things together just for the sake of trying to take someone down. And I think that's where this went incredibly wrong. like some people decided that they or they got an order to take Candace down to get her to stop talking about this. They were so I guess gung-ho to go out there and try to take her down that they didn't even get their story straight or they didn't focus on the topic at hand. Did he or did he not see these people at Fort Wua Wuka? That's the question. The question is not what what happened with him and his ex-wife and and his kid. that that's not the question at right now. And it's it's like if you were on trial, if there was a case and we were sitting in a courtroom and someone was on trial and let's say they were on trial for allegedly throwing a soda bottle at someone's head. I don't know. I'm just picking something out of the air. Then next thing you know, the defense goes comes up to the the defendant, the prosecution comes up to the defendant and they start saying things like, "Is it true that uh that you failed the ninth grade?" Okay, what does that have to do with whether or not they threw a soda bottle at someone's head? So, I think these are the kind of things we need to pay attention to and that's where I think people started to get off course and that's why Alex Jones, another one, all of them are just they kind of got the order to come in and try to take this down because now it's starting to implicate the military allegedly. So, now it's a problem especially for all the promilitary people. Oh, let me come in. We got to take we got to hush this down. Don't criticize the military. No, no, no. Ay is is like we didn't know where this was coming from. Everyone was like money must have just gone out. Like what is happening? Well, tonight was when they did their live to expose me and accidentally exposed Turning Point USA and Erica Kirk. Now, I'm going to show you the messages. Andrew Kovette was apparently live texting this guy, Erica's alibi. Now, this means Erica is sending her alibi. Why wouldn't you send it to me? Obviously, I didn't have a horse in the race of whether or not he saw you at the hotel. You could have just been like, "Here's where I was on September 8th, and this whole idea of you even being there would have gone away." Instead, she sends it to Andrew Kovette to send to these obscure YouTubers who are live, and it didn't click with them that Andrew Kovette did not want them to say that he was their source. So, this guy just starts live reading the messages that are coming in from Andrew Kovette where he proceeds to give an alibi that no one asked for. He's like, "This is what Erica was doing on September 9th." Okay. The guy said he saw her on the ETH. It's kind of like the Brian Harpole where they're just like giving us alibis for times that we're not talking about. Again, I wasn't even necessarily pressuring them for an alibi, but he then proceeds to walk him through what Erica was doing on September 9th, and he's pretending like she doesn't even know what Fort Wuka was, even though her mother has a contract with the Department of Defense, and would have obviously had been familiar with Fort Wuka, which is in her backyard. Ah, I told you guys. We're going to get into it again a little bit more about about her background. Like, why are people pretending like this could have never happened? as if she wouldn't even know what this is. So, they just keep exposing themselves. Like, that's the thing. They keep exposing themselves. They could have handled this privately. They don't want to. By the way, if uh they feel as though all these things that Candace are saying are lies. Why isn't there a lawsuit from Erica Kirk to Candace Owens? Why isn't there a lawsuit from TPUSA to Candace Owens? It's not like Candace hasn't received lawsuits before. Erica, by the way, she studied law. Would you not do you guys know that she studied uh legal studies? She also majored in political science and international relations. Go figure. So, she knows the law. and in Turning Point USA's backyard as well. I'll pause it here. So, Andrew Kovit's live directing a non-alibby. So, see this? That's Erica's hand and that's the the message that I was reading you guys. Wow. Again, I would like to point out that no one said Erica was in some fort. No one said she was in Tucson. And no one said that they saw her on September 9th anywhere. So, I don't I don't know what this is. It's just weird. Like, it's like it's a totally strange thing to say. Again, when you have an easy pathway to just reach out to me and say, "Hey, I saw you mention something on September 8th. Here's where Erica was." Notice that's Erica's hand. So that means Erica, the CEO of Turningpoint USA, is directing the spokesperson of Turning Point USA, Andrew Colbeat, to send her alibi to Paramount Tactical as he is like going into the history of Mitch and supposed to be exposing Mitch for being a serial abuser but actually exposes Turning Point USA. like you just So, how many of these people, these content creators that came out to expose this Mitch dude, how many of them were contacted by TPUSA? I don't know. And we may never know. But see, this is, you know, you have to pay attention to these things, guys. Got to pay attention to it. I cannot make this up. This is like a PR nightmare. A crisis. Is this just a crisis? Wait, I'm going to show you another message from Andrew. Being super discreet here. Yes, that's Erica's hand. See, this is what I was talking about. What the what? O, this one right here. I want to read. See again. Went to dinner with Charlie. Literally, literally people are you lunatics. Proof she was with her kids at 8:33 a.m. PT. Don't share. Taking them for a walk before going into the office. What the [ __ ] I look, I'm just saying the Tik Tockers are going to have a field day, okay? BB Netanyahu has not gotten these Tik Tockers out of control. They already are not feeling the vibes about Erica. Now you got this directing behind the scenes attacks on really Candace for whatever reason, but like sending them out to do videos about Mitch um and then you do this like false debunking when it's just like so like telling the truth is free. Like if you could just be like, "Here you go." It's going to lead people to ask questions and it's probably the opposite thing is going to happen where people are going to wonder if Mitch's memory was correct. And he did see Erica at Fort Wuka on September 8th in the evening as Charlie Kirk was touching down from Tokyo um into Los Angeles. So I'm just saying this is a PR nightmare. This is just turning point man. Not good. No, it's not good. They just keep like they keep shooting themselves in the hand. Now again, when I say uh gangsters paradise, we're still on the gangsters paradise theme. Turning Point USA to me is basically one big mega church. That's what it seems like to me. It's not just this this organization that is supposed to go out there and recruit more conservatives and get them to vote for conservative like candidates. I feel like Turning Point USA has become some big massive mega church which also would explain that hideous bling bling uh fanny. What was the woman's name? I forget the woman's name. You know, the mega church pastor outfit that Erica Kirk wore at America Fest that first day when she came out and I was like, "What? Why is she wearing that?" It's It's gives me those vibes. Gives me those vibes. So, to me, Turning Point USA has basically become one big mega church. Yeah, they're out there to help the Republican party, but also ultimately it seems like Israel has greatly kind of taken over uh and got their claws synced in to Turning Point USA as well. So, I'm just going to call it a mega church. That's what I'm going to call it. But when you look back again with Erica Kirk's like history and the family connection, Fort Wuka is not out of the question. She should be familiar with what it is. I think this is from anonymous here. Listen to this. Because when you trace her bloodline, the story darkens fast. The deeper you follow her lineage, the clearer it becomes. This isn't romance. It's recruitment. Erica Kirk wasn't always Kirk. She was born Erica Franvy, daughter of Kent Franvy, a man tied to the Department of Defense and instrumental in building Rathon's missile defense systems in Israel. Now, you can't always help what your parents do, right? Like my parents were military. I can't help what they did as a living. But when you look at the path that Erica Kirk has decided to take, it says a lot of things. So again, we told you before about her dad. We told you how he was, you see the the Israel connection right there. Also, didn't she say that uh she met Charlie? I think the first time she said she met him was in Israel, but then someone came along and they debunked that and they said, "No, they actually met um in New York uh during Trump's first, I guess, camp presidential campaign." See, a lot of these things don't add up. A lot of it just don't add up. Yet today, his name is almost vanished from the internet. Every trace deleted. Coincidence? Maybe. But her mother, Lorie Fransy, runs a company holding multiple government contracts, defense, homeland security, even NASA. and her grandfather Carl Kenneth Franvy, vice president of American Banknote Company, a firm specializing in secure IDs and secret printing tech. Grand chief of a fraternal Viking order kned by the king of Sweden. This isn't just a family. It's a network powerful, protected, and deeply connected. These are the gangsters. I was telling you, these are the gangsters. the people were deeply connected. You know, Erica Kirk wasn't just a beauty pageant who just happened to meet Charlie Kirk in Israel and they just she just happened to go to a a Turning Point USA job. She was interested in working for TPUSA and he just happened to say, "Hey, I actually want to date you instead." Honey, the stars don't align that much. Okay, things sometimes the stars do align, but they don't align that much. So, she is coming from a family that is deeply connected to intelligence and the military. At only 17, Erica founded Romanian Angels, a nonprofit meant to save orphans. But locals in Romania whisper another story that some of these aid missions masked trafficking routes. And in 2013, Erica posted a video thanking Colonel Busher III, a man accused of sex trafficking and running a brothel from a US base. See what I'm saying, right? Like I know I mentioned this uh weeks weeks ago when we first started diving into who she really was cuz in the beginning I didn't realize this about her and I started like people saying look her up more and I started looking her up more and I'm like oh okay. Then when you look into other information, and by the way, this is available publicly on Wikipedia. Check it out before they take it down. You know, it just all fit the typical image. Majored in political science and international relations, also later on studied legal studies. You know, it just it it I and I and this is not to say everyone that majors in political science or international relations is sus, but when you see someone these people in these powerful positions, right? When I was growing up, when I was in undergrad, political science was deemed one of the more useless majors cuz it's just like if you really want to get into politics and government, you don't have to major in political science to do that. Uh, I guess it can help you in some ways to learn a little bit more about how the government works, but you don't have to major in political science to learn that. So, it's just one of those degrees is just like, nah. But the political science and international relations connection, man, I'm telling you, a lot of these people deeply, deeply connected. The same base where reports of missing children still linger. Then she studied at Regis College, a Jesuit stronghold, before joining New York's elite, the Corkerin Group, the same firm that listed Jeffrey Epstein's mansion. Somehow, this small town girl kept climbing. And in 2012, she became Miss Arizona under the ownership of Donald Trump. Her future husband, Charlie Kirk, met her during a pilgrimage to Israel with her mother. The same Israel that tied back to her father's defense work. Then came tragedy. Charlie's death ruled a shooting, but her reaction unshaken. On stage, she forgave the alleged killer before any proof. And while others, like Candace Owens, demanded answers, Erica focused on fundraising. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Oh my gosh. You know, she she forgave Tyler Robinson. She seemed to have more sympathy for Tyler Robinson than she did for uh Candace Owens. It's really weird. It was very weird how she just instantly said it was him, it was him, and just went along with the narrative. That's what I said. I'm like, don't you guys find it kind of weird that she's just not questioning this at all? She just went right along with the script, ladies and gentlemen. and taking Charlie's seat as CEO of Turning Point USA. The same man who just before his death began questioning Israel's influence. And now she carries his torch, but without his fire, without his doubt, with calm eyes and a spotless image. Too calm, some say, too perfect, others whisper. Maybe she's a widow. Or maybe she's the weapon. a honey trap deployed to silence, redirect, and reset. I would say she was probably recruited. And I I'll tell you, and you'll learn this uh you know, as you get older for the younger people, you don't get all these opportunities just because you worked hard. Working hard is important. It does matter. But you have to have connections as well. And sometimes when you have a lot of connections and the right connections, you don't really have to work hard. Surprise. So the stars do not align as much as they seem to have for Erica. That is not that's not reality. And now they're out there sending text messages to people with with a date that wasn't the date that Mitch said he saw her there. So if people are wondering like why do people keep questioning Turning Point USA etc because you look shady, you look sus and you've been lying and that's why people are asking these questions and also the FBI they lying too. I mean it's just it's so obvious. So obvious. So yeah, man. Um, doing that live stream trying to put that message out there and say that, well, this is where she was on said date and it was the wrong date doesn't help their case. What a mess. Hey guys, this was a savvy clip. If you like what you saw, hit that like button and subscribe.
A pregnant mommy sleuth who was locked into this investigation discovered something that me and my team had missed. I consider her obviously and all of you to be my decentralized intelligence agents. Anyway, she sent me a rather urgent email and I'm obviously protecting her identity for for, you know, reasons that are clear, but I want you to know that this discovery is due entirely to her. She is the person that in this regard went max for Charlie when I missed something. Her email stated in effect that I was only partially right about the plane tracking Charlie, that she had done an additional 15 hours of research and was able to discern that the person the planes were actually tracking for years was Erica, not Charlie, but Erica was the one being tracked by these planes. And indeed, it turns out that she was correct. She discovered that between 2022 and September uh of 2025, both of those aircrafts, SUBTT, the yellow plane, and SUBND, the blue plane, showed 68 overlaps with Erica's documented loca locations. Okay, 68 overlaps. I have since been able to add now uh 73 times that this overlapped. Okay. And 29 of those instances also happened to include Charlie. Charlie was also present. And that's what I was stumbling upon when I was looking into this. I was like, why is this plane where Charlie is? The uh flights were majority clustered within five states. Kansas, uh Missouri, Nebraska, Delaware, and Utah. And it's a pattern that she believes is statistically not random. I am telling you this information has been completely verified. I am showing you this on a spreadsheet now. These are all the instances um uh in which this plane 60 all 68 instances that this plane crossed with Erica and I'm also going to say this includes overseas as well. Okay. So, my instant question becomes, why didn't Turning Point acknowledge that this plane was familiar to them? When I was talk taking all of these figurative online bullets, someone could have easily said something, right? That's kind of a repeat thing in this investigation. Josh Hammer lies, I get attacked. Turning Point just stays silent. They know he's lying, but they allow the lie to flow. Alex Clark lies, I get attacked, I'm telling the truth. Turning Point knows it, but they kind of allow this like Catholic thing lie to flow and the influencers are allowed to lie. Nobody at Turning Point ever just steps to clarify that I'm on to something or I'm telling the truth about something. And when it comes to these Egyptian flights, the math on this is indisputable. There is less than a 0.000000001% probability. Okay, under random distribution models that these Egyptian planes coincidentally landed around Erica at these times. Like I said, this plane was not just with her in America. It was also tracking her overseas as well. I flagged this cuz I was alarmed because I thought it was tracking Charlie. And I am telling you that this plane in addition to Charlie and primarily actually was tracking Erica.
Candace Owens ACCUSES Erika Kirk as TPUSA Invite Unravels Mr BlueJeans Dec 7, 2025 #charliekirknews #erikakirk #candaceowens
Candace Owens Accuses Erika Kirk as TPUSA Invite Drama Unravels. Candace insinuates that Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point TPUSA, would have had a will vs the diary of his succession plan which his widow, Erika, says he shared as well as the blueprint for his succession. This is one of the many aftermaths of Charlie Kirk shooting. Candace accuses them of controlling Charlie Kirk
[Candace Owens] And I think their thought process was, it will be much easier for us to control the spirit of Charlie Kirk than the actual living, breathing Charlie Kirk.
Do you agree? She has accused us of lying about Charlie wanting Erica to take over for him if he died. Never happened. You must be on crack. He left me a blueprint and all of his journals. And wouldn't he have maybe formalized that succession plan outside of like a diary? I was his bold for literally everything. He shared everything with me, his vision, his dreams. maybe formalize it in a will cuz that's what you're supposed to do. If you are thinking about dying and you need to make a plan, you you make a will. I'm sure he had a will, but no, he he wanted to put it in these notebooks. More than ever, he's up in heaven orchestrating and sitting and strategizing, and I can just feel it. I think their thought process was, it will be much easier for us to control the spirit of Charlie Kirk than the actual living, breathing Charlie Kirk. That's the vibe that I'm starting to get. I'm so glad I'm not you.
Erika Kirk is LYING. I’ll prove it. by Nadia4Real Oct 5, 2025
Erika Kirk is LYING. I’ll prove it.
This video reveals the manipulation tactics that liars use to deceive others, by analyzing Erika Kirk’s bizarre behavior in her first public address.
Transcript
I keep getting asked what I think of Erica Kirk, her speeches, her recent behavior on the podcast, and if I think that any of it is real. So, I'm here to assure you with 100% certainty that I'm not buying it. I'm a trained actor and I've worked in film and on stage for years, and I can tell you that any trained actor can see right through Erica Kirk. Good actors have different methods of getting into character. This allows them to express the genuine emotions that the scene elicits. But bad actors always have the same MMO, exaggeration and melodrama. One of the biggest tells of a bad actor is gesturing, also known as the Vanna White effect. If you don't know who she is, Google her. For example, they deliver the line, "I have a headache," while rubbing their temples or grabbing their head to show you how much pain they're in. But does anyone actually do this when they really have a headache? The challenge for the actor is to live as if something were true while knowing that it's not. A good actor can temporarily suspend their disbelief to create an illusion for the audience. But when the actor can't even get themselves to believe the lie, they gesture to try to convince us to believe it. And Erica's entire speech is just one big gesture after another. I can already hear you saying, "Well, Erica isn't an actor." But I disagree. She's just a really bad one.
