Charlie Kirk Murder and TPUSA Insider Gossip

[admin]

Candace Owens Just BROKE This “Truth Warrior” Brain — WITHOUT EVEN TRYING [Alex Jones]
I AM COACH COLIN
Jan 1, 2026 #CandaceOwens #CharlieKirk #TurningPointUSA

Candace Owens hasn’t said much — and that’s exactly the problem.

While Candace stayed quiet, a so-called “truth warrior” went completely unhinged. Rants. Accusations. Screaming about war. Claims of globalist agents, deep state ties, and imaginary back-and-forths that never happened.

In this episode, I break down how attacking Candace Owens became a full-blown meltdown — without Candace even trying. From projection tactics to recycled talking points, to a bizarre sit-down where Candace was defended while being blamed, the cracks are impossible to ignore.

This isn’t disagreement.
This is collapse.



Transcript

Boop, boop, boop, boop. There it is. There it is. Let's go.
Let's get into it. 2026. What is going on, guys? Coach Colin
here. Hope you had a great new year. And honestly, if you stayed up until like 1
2 a.m., all good. But if you fell asleep at like 9:00 p.m., 1000 p.m., and you
just woke up and it was next year, even better. That's the way to do that's the way to do it, you know. I think that's
the way to do. You say, "Happy New Year." You go to sleep and you wake up, it's New Year, you roll over, look at
your wife, your husband, whatever, cat, dog, and you say, "Happy New Year." And you just you just start your day out.
Anyway, whatever you did, hope you had fun. Um, let's get right into it. We're
talking about Bal into the new year. We're talking about the downfall that
needs to be studied by by the most the most sophisticated scholars that we have
available. Whoever is in the deep crevices of the Vatican, the archive, those people need to take all the
information on balance and they need to study the downfall. We need to have that preserved because it is a lesson
learned, well learned for all of us, whether you're in a creator or not. But
now, let's get into it because Blex went on a very unhinged rant when it came to
Candace. He's just going all out. It makes no sense. Candace hasn't even
spoken to him. We'll talk about that a little bit. Um, then there's three videos. So, one he just goes absolutely
nuts. Another one he's supposed to be working out, but instead he makes this video. He literally says at the
beginning of the video, he's like, "We're supposed to work out, but I just want to talk about Candace all day, every day." Okay. And I'm like, "Hey,
hey, welcome to the club, man." Okay. Um, but and then the third video, uh, this
person, Elizabeth Lane, investigated, uh, investigative journalist, uh, she
sits down with Alex, and she wants to kind of make peace between Candace and Alex, and she actually defends Candace
in front of Alex. And it's a very interesting sitdown that they have. Uh
he would not let her talk for more than like 10 seconds at a time. May maybe maybe 20 seconds sometimes. Uh he just
kept cutting her off. Uh I have the whole thing broken down here. We'll start with video one because that's the
most wild of what he had to say. Uh he's he's he's going into the whole thing.
There is a a technique, a tactic where
you accuse people of what you're guilty of. You know, it's it's a it's a very
well-used tactic in in uh in all fields
uh but especially uh left and right politics. It's it's very it's used a lot
in politics and Alex is very well trained in this technique. uh especially
now now that it's looking like he has been compromised in some way. He knows
that the next step and and it just came in like clockwork uh attacking for no
reason. Uh acting like he's having back and forths with Candace when he's really just getting called out by people like
me and various other people, just people in the comments section, etc. And somehow he's connecting that to Candace.
He's gone the extra step and he's decided to accuse her of what he I think
he is guilty of. He says in this video right away, he's like, "I knew she was a globalist agent. She's a globalist
agent. I dropped the ball. I failed you. I should have followed my gut. It's never wrong." So, you know, little
technique that he's doing here. He's showing like, "Hey, like always, you know, I'm always right. And I knew about
this before, but I didn't want to tell you guys because, you know, I just I went against my gut, but I knew the
whole time, just so you know, okay, I knew the entire time. Okay, so he says,
you know, uh, the gut's never wrong, etc. He says, I love her people threatening me and doxing me. You think
it's going to make me go away? All you did was wake me up. Because this is like one of those rants where he's slamming
the table and he's screaming and you know he's he's trying to bring back the old Ballocks that we all loved to watch
because it was just unhinged and funny. He's trying to bring that back but it's in a very cringy way. So he then says,
and first off, you know, again, he's trying to connect her to people in the comment section who are actually his
followers who are calling him out for what he's doing. Somehow that's her.
That's her. That's not That's not the fact that his audience is literally
letting him be able to read the room through what they have to say. That's
not what it is. No. All his followers absolutely love him. And anybody who's going against him has to be her people.
And then he also says that they're doxing him. They're they're they're your
tones. Okay. You live in the most
prestigious I I think he still lives there. The most prestigious place in Texas. I I've been I've been to this
place. Okay. Because me and my wife like to just look at amazing houses. We we go we go around there all the time. It's
the most prestigious place that you could possibly live in. It's It's wild.
So, everybody knows where you're at. And then when it comes to the studio where he does his thing, people obviously know
where that is. you have guests there and people end up talking about it. He's acting like as if, you know, like you
could just Google it. It's It's like Rogan being like, "Man, people are figuring out where I live now." It's
like, you just Google it. Where does Ro where does Rogan live? Oh, you want to see the mansion? Here's the mansion that
he bought. Like, yeah, obviously it's it's it's public knowledge, buddy. Uh,
then he says, "Get your butts ready." But he doesn't use the word butts. Okay. He says, "You want war. You want a war.
I want your war. I want it all. I want the doxing. I want the lies. I want the
attacks. I'm going to take you on." It's crazy. Absolutely crazy. Cuz again,
he's talking to people in the comments and because they're calling him out so voraciously,
he's just bringing all of that energy. Instead of being like, "hm, maybe I'm wrong here." instead of that, he's just
going, "No, no, no, no. This this all has to be directed to Candace." Now, it's very interesting. And I don't think
it's just that he's out of touch. I think there's part of that because I
think he thought he could make this hard turn and that we wouldn't notice. I
think that's the part that's out of touch. He's used to people always just being like, "He's always right, so we'll just follow him wherever." Um, I think
there is some kind of incentive. I don't know what it is, but when a dude's a
billion dollars in debt and he's saying that he needs money to keep his company
afloat to keep things going, I don't know. I don't know. I I think uh
desperation makes people do things that are straight up out of character. That's That's just me. Then he says uh and it's
just so funny that he's like, "I want the lies. I want the" And the way he's yelling about it, it's like, "You want the attention. That's what you're
looking for. You're Tim Pool. You're Tim Pool with no hat on. Okay, that's that's what's happening here basically, right?
You're Ian Carol without the research and without the hair. It's fine. It's cool. You know, I'm so glad we got we
have Ian to replace B. Okay, because I know that's what's hap there's a changing of the guard happening and uh
and that's that's what's happening right now. Ian is replacing B slowly. Ian's
not doing it intentionally, but he does such incredible research. He's willing to talk about whatever. It's just it's
bound to happen very very slowly. For a lot of us, it's already taken place. Uh
he says, "You work for the deep state." Okay, so again, this is him addressing people who are in the comment section.
So now he's decided to turn to Candace and he's saying that she works for the deep state. She works for the Democratic
Party. And no, I had I did not write that wrong. I'm writing what he said. He
said, "The Democratic Party, uh, the agency and MI6, I see your
butt." And he didn't use the word butt. So, you get ready. Keep in mind, Candace
has not done her show in almost two weeks. And the only response that she's
given him so far is, "I never changed my story, bro. Are you okay?" And that was
in regards to uh Alex said, I mean uh who what who said what? I got a mumble
mouth. That's all that is. Back said Mr. Tones.
Uh he ended up saying that when it came to the Fort Wuka thing that Candace was
stepping away from that and she's going back to the planes and the plane things have been debunked. He's just pretty
much making up this narrative that she's like jumping from story to story. Um,
but in reality, she just identified something that was going on with the Egyptian planes. Uh, so she literally
just said, "I never changed my story. Are you okay?" That's what she has said in response to him. So far, there's been
no long breakdown. There's been no monologue. There's been nothing in
almost two weeks. That's why it's so weird. If you look back at all the videos I do when I'm breaking down what
Alex has to say, she hasn't said anything to him. And yet he's ramping it up to the point where he's yelling about
going to war. Now he's saying that she works for all these entities. And it's like, where did that even come from? She
never said that about him. I did. I don't know if any other creators have,
right? I know a lot of people in in on X are coming to that conclusion now.
creators and otherwise, we're all starting to come to this conclusion because we're seeing such a hard pivot
for absolutely no reason. No reason that we could see, which is why I lean
towards some kind of incent uh incentive. Not sure if it's financial, not sure if
it's power-wise, uh not sure if it's keep him out of jailwise. I have no idea what it is, but something has been
offered to him. That's just me. That's just what I think. Um, so after that, uh, Candace hasn't said
anything to him. Then he does another video. Again, there's been no response from Candace after this video that he's made, right? No response whatsoever. Uh,
then he makes another video where he's in the gym and he's like, I just want to talk about Candace all day, you know?
And it's it's it's kind of funny because it's like, okay, that's weird. And his his trainer is in the background kind of
just like, okay, I'm I'm here. I'm paying, you're paying me, I'm here. And
I guess we're making a Candace video. Uh, so he just kind of sits in the background as kind of being like, I wish
I wasn't involved in this. But then he goes, uh, he says, and I have to break
this down because I love to break down how people do things uh, language-wise.
Okay, Balix keeps doing this thing where you know somebody will say and you know this
to be true or they'll say things like and we all know these people are liars.
They'll they'll they'll preface it with this statement and it's almost like they're trying to put that thought into
your head before they begin speaking. It's a very weird thing. You see that a lot in corporate media. um you don't see
it in the fringes as much. Uh you don't see it in the independent space as much cuz the independent space is usually a
lot of researchbased or it's just like you know like me just you know making you laugh and stuff like that. So you
never really see that too much but you're seeing it with him a whole lot. I don't know if it's cuz he's a part of the older generation or what. But the
thing he does in this he says here's the straw man. Here's the straw man that all of you keep building. and then he never
states the straw man. So, it's like he's starting the conversation off with something very deep where he's going to
expose something that these people, these minions are all doing to him, but
he never brings it up. He never states what the straw man is and he just starts ranting about things that other people
have already covered. Now, he show it right there on the screen. He starts talking about the people who cheered and
that's in regards to there were people that cheered after Charlie got hit. Uh
there was the one guy who did the whole USA thing, but there was actually more people beyond that. Uh I showed it in an
interview. There was one interview where one student actually got uh interviewed and it was like directly after
everything happened and he said that after it happened he said there was a bunch of people who cheered and the
reporter was very surprised and I believe that was from a News Nation uh
interview. I'm pretty sure so that's that's what that kid said, right?
There's no footage of these people actually cheering. There's none of that. And you don't hear it after the hit. you
hear a bunch of people screaming and running and you actually don't see it because I've watched the footage from all sorts of different angles and you
don't see anybody actually cheering. But that one person who was interviewed actually said that there was cheering.
This is something that I covered as soon as it happened. Uh and I'm not the only person. Other people did as well. Uh
he's talking like he's the first person to break it all down as always. Then all obviously George Zinn, you know, George
Zinn saying I did it, I did it, etc. um which again people already covered
and then uh people who predicted it on X. There was various people who actually
said something was going to happen to Charlie like they knew and this part is
kind of uh valid from B. But the thing about it is is that he's kind of using
it as look at all the stuff that I bring to the table and nobody's focusing on
that. And I've said this before, you know, you can focus wherever you want.
You can go down whatever path you'd like to go down. So if you want to go deeper into those people, which I'm I feel like
Jesse did. I feel like Jesse went deep into these people who were talking on Twitter, I I I I'm going to actually ask
him. I'm going to message him and ask him, but I'm pretty sure he already went deep into those people. He wanted to
That was the wrong choice of words. uh he went deep into why those people said what they said,
who those people were, etc. Uh I think Tucker even examined that a little bit.
So again, you could just go down that rabbit hole. You don't have you don't have to expect Candace to come with you.
And honestly, you don't have to expect anybody to come with you. Maybe there's people who I've already looked at every
angle of George Zinn. Not really interested in looking at him anymore. I
think he's very weird. I think it's too coincidental that he's been a part of all these things and now all of a sudden
he pops up at this thing. He pops up at a turning point event when this type of thing happens at a turning point event
and he has all this connection to uh people in Utah in in politics.
I think it's just not a coincidence. And then he disappears. He's gone now and he gets arrested on a crazy charge. And
please don't say what the charge is in the comments. Um, but he gets hit with a crazy charge and now nobody can even
talk to him and he's just gone. That's weird. That's very weird. And he should
be locked up, but who knows if he actually is. I have no idea. Right. So B
could just go down this road himself, but if for some reason he's angry that everybody's not following him. Again, I
really do think that there is, and I even say it here, back to jealousy, because now he's mad that people are
saying Candace is the only one investigating. I really do think that there is an aspect of this where it is
him being upset that everybody is not following him in the fringe space, in
the independent space. It's been broken up. It's been broken up quite a bit. There are people who are like, "No, I'm
sitting through 3 hours of Baron. I want to know what Baron has to say. I'm listening to Ian. I'm listening to, you
know, when Valhalla was doing the whole thing about the breakdown with the trajectory and the C2 and C3 and
everything and if that makes sense and if that's possible and what the security was doing there. It's been broken up.
There was a time where it was just him. There was a time where it was just Bill Cooper. Okay? And a lot of people have
been calling that out. There was a time where it was just him and then Blex came along and Bill called
out B and I think I think Bill was right and I
won't get into that too much but but exactly what I'm saying about B now is what Bill was saying what 25 years ago
maybe 30 years ago he was calling it out and and and in regular fashion when it
comes to people who are compromised Alex gets to keep going. You know, you could say, "Oh, you know, he's he's not
around. He's only on one place." You could say that if you want, but he got to keep going and keep saying what he's
saying. Bill didn't. And that always shows me, you know, sadly sadly in our
world, in our time in times past, that shows you who the real person is, you
know. Just saying. Just saying. Charlie's gone. But all those guys at
turning point get to keep going kind of thing. I I've always said this. I've said this a hundred times. They always go for the leaders. For the true
leaders, for the true ones who are actually going to make a difference, they always go for them. They never go
for the henchmen because once the leader is gone, it is easy to mold those
henchmen because they're scared. They don't have a leader anymore. and they
I'm not saying this happened with Turning Point, but you know just in times past they get propositioned to
become the leader and get all the benefits that the leader would have gotten if the leader would just walk a
straight line like he was told. So just saying when it came to uh Bill and Bal.
Um then he goes on to say you guys have more unified talking points than MSNBC.
Again, this goes right back to accuse them of what you're guilty of because
he's he now has the same talking points as Gary. He has now the same talking points as everybody who has turned uh on
Candace. He has the exact same talking points. And on top of it, he's just
making things up. But we'll get into that in a second. Um and that's why a lot of people try to bully me. And I
know I'm right. I didn't want to have to be on this, you know. And I I highlight
this not just because of what he said here about the talking points, but it's like he's not even making sense. That's
where it gets really weird. It's like he's not making sense as he's talking. You know, he's just like people are
bullying me and you know, Candace, you know, people are saying Candace is the only one investigating and and he's
like, you I have all this stuff that I've been investigating and it's like, well, no one cares, bro. And it's not
like, you know, this guy's, you know, I'm talking the way I'm talking. It's not like he's lost all his fans. He's still good. You still have a viable
business. You still you still have people following you. So, just go go and do whatever you got to do. It's it's the
weirdest thing. That's why for me, it just see I even wrote it here. I even wrote Poliola right down there. Um, we
used to give Bal months of space to be proven right or wrong, but he can't do
that for Candace. And that was a realization I had. And you know, Elizabeth actually brings up that same point is that he is like hellbent on
showing that Candace is wrong. And Candace literally interviewed Mitch, hasn't done her show for almost two
weeks. And it's like wrong, wrong, wrong. This is wrong. And everybody is trying to debunk it. And people are
trying to get a hold of her. And you know, Gary's calling Mitch and trying to be nice and like all this stuff's going
on. We would give B, and it's crazy that Bal would turn like this because we would
give Bal months. He would say something and we'd go, "Well, you know, this is
Bal. He says that he has some information. It's from a good source." We would give him months to be proven
right or wrong. And even if it was wrong, we wouldn't even stand up and be like, "You were wrong. Admit you were
wrong, etc." Nobody would even do that with him. They would sit back and say, "What's the next thing? He wasn't right
about this, but guess what? He was right about XYZ, so let's keep giving him this
grace." And he was afforded that grace for decades. You know, I've always said
people should make a compilation of everything he's been right about, right? Rogan actually famously said that as
well, but you could make a compilation of everything he's wrong about, too,
right? But we don't talk about that because we everybody likes the guy.
But now that he's like turning like this, it's just like I don't know, man. I don't know. Like next thing you know,
he's going to have a video of Ben Shapiro. That's that's where this is going, guys. That's that's really what I think. I
think it's it's getting to that point where eventually we're going to see him sitting down with Ben Shapiro. And it's going to be a very sad day. And that
will be the day that it's over. That will be the day that it's just done. Now, Elizabeth, who is uh this
lady here, she sat down with Alex J. um
what? I don't know. I don't know. I have a space in my teeth. Makes it hard to talk
sometimes. That's all. Misspoke Tones. Uh
she sat down with him and she wanted to actually defend Candace, but she also wanted to bring the two of them
together. She thinks that there's two there two big voices that don't need to be fighting like this. But also
but also what's really interesting about this is even her is having this she's
going from the premise that Candace is fighting with him which is not
happening. She's not doing anything. Even Even in her live that she did on X,
she had one of Bax's guys there. She didn't even really mention Alex. She had
the back and forth with him, right? And she handled him pretty well and she allowed him to to put out the notion
that she's completely wrong and this is nothing, etc. But she didn't even address there. So he she she he keeps
there there's this narrative being pushed that there's this fight and there's not a fight there. It's
literally just B escalating and escalating day after day with no like
what is Asmin go? Asmin Gold always phrases it as you're fighting with ghosts. That's what it's like, you know?
It's like you're saying a bunch of things and you're retorting, you're responding to a bunch of things that haven't been said to you, right? And
again, Bal keeps taking and it even says it in this. He keeps taking what people
like I like me what what I'm saying what various other people are saying you know
I even said when I saw that video the first part that I told you about where he's saying she works for this and she
works for that I said there's no more of this for you like I I made a post and it
was like the most viewed post I've ever had. I was like there's no more of you saying this to people. It's clearly you
who's working for these entities. Clearly, there's no more of you banging the table and pointing at the globalist.
You're one of them. You know what I mean? Like, I love I love Joe, you know?
I always talk about like I got a picture of him. I love Joe, right? I've done I've done a lot of Joe Rogan content,
but like I'm not dumb to the fact that like he's good friends with the DNI. He knows the bureau director. He knows the
now press. He knows vice he knows VP. Uh, you know, like he knows a huge bunch
of people who are in the military. Like I I can see that, right? I don't I don't
I'm more charitable to him than most people. Uh, you know, but you I still
think he's a legit guy. I still think he says things that he thinks. But it's like you can see who he's connected to.
And it's like we can't see that with Ball. We're not allowed to see that with Bal. He's connected to all those people
as well. And yet, we're supposed to believe he's this guy on the fringes. That's the thing, you know, about I'm
just going to say this really quick, then we're going to move on. But there is a notion that in the Matrix, there's
a there's there's a theory in the Matrix, if you remember the place Zion, that was like underground where the
people were and that's where the people got to be and that that's where the dance party is and all that stuff that happens. And that's where they, you
know, they they gather. There's a theory that Zion is the Matrix
that when someone like Neo is going through uh he's not being the best
battery. They give him the memory of the things popping off and him going down a
shoot and meeting Morpheus and all this stuff happening and him being the one
because that's what they do with any battery. You remember when they were all in those little pods? That's what they
do with any battery that is not uh performing properly because people don't
like a utopia. They get very upset with mundane life. So they start performing
at a lower level. This happens in life. So apparently that's what's happening in the Matrix. So when he goes down the
Zion, all those people that are in Zion, they're still in their pods, but they
feel like they're out of their pods. And I use that analogy because there's a lot of people when they see these people who
are on the fringes, they feel like, I've broken free from corporate media. I'm
completely free from that now. But in reality, those same people who are on the fringes
who you think you go, well, they they're they're banned on these places and this and that. You think that you're on the
fringes. You've been completely released, but they're in line with the same entities that the corporate media
is in line with. And it's just to give you the illusion that you've broken free, but you're still hearing the
talking points. And as I as I get older now, I'm realizing that's what Balance
is. That's why he's been allowed to operate on the level that he has for so
long. Go back and figure out how much he was making before before all the stuff h all
the lawsuit stuff happened. Go hear how much he was making before. It was crazy.
It was like it was like Joe Rogan money. It was nuts. So that that's why they hit
him with that type of lawsuit because they knew how much he was making before.
It was a lot. It was a lot. Go check. It was nuts. But anyway,
let's move on. Uh, so this whole thing I'm giving more
of a breakdown of it than a playby-play cuz it was like 30 minutes and I didn't want to like I'm not going to write like
I didn't want it to look like a script that I was writing like a like I was a screenwriter going back and forth. But E
is Elizabeth. Bal is um it's normal to follow leads. So this is what E had to
say which is Elizabeth. She had to say it's normal to follow leads that could be right or wrong. Candace gets the same
right, don't you think? So that's basically what she's opening with. She's opening with, "Well, you know, she could
be right or she could be wrong." But especially Elizabeth, she's coming at it from an investigator standpoint where
she says, "This happens when you're a journalist. You're allowed to have uh a
lead that you follow for weeks and then you realize it's the wrong lead and then you start again or you realize you have
nothing and then you stumble onto something and you go and that's the right thing." She's she was saying like this is a thing that happens. She goes,
"Why isn't Candace afforded that same right to be right or wrong?" Because that's how an investigation works. And
she goes back, which is a great point, she goes back to the beginning of when Candace first decided to do this. And
she says she told everybody that they're just going to be seeing what she sees. She told everybody that she would be
right about things and they'd be wrong about things, but they're just trying to figure it out. And of course, Bal
doesn't want to hear any of this, but uh so he interrupts her. He says, "Oh,
that's not the point. You know, she's not just asking questions. There's real people involved." And again, same
talking points that we've been hearing. Like those are literally turning point talking points. Okay? They're saying,
"Well, these are real people and what she's doing is wrong and you can't just do this type of thing." You know, Frank
Turk being like, "Shut up unless you have hard evidence." Like that type of thing. He's he's doing the exact same
thing in this conversation. And then she says in regards to Erica, she corrects Alex really quick because Alex is like,
"Oh, she implicated uh she's implicated Erica Kirk in the whole thing." And she
goes, "She never said Erica did anything." She's, and then she says, and also when it comes to an investigation,
she's like, "Who do we look at first?" She goes, "The wife always gets looked at first. It's not an abnormal thing."
And then she says to him, she's like, "Can you bet your life that Erica is completely innocent?" She goes, "No, because you don't know." And that's 100%
true. Very level-headed stuff. Uh Bal then goes on because, you know, uh
Elizabeth is saying all of these positive things about uh Candace. Alex then goes, he's like, "Did you know, did
you know that Candace got taken off the Turning Point website two years ago?" Because they were having a conversation
about whether or not Candace and Charlie were actually friends. And Elizabeth
doesn't know. Okay. But she does say, "I'm not going to debate whether or not Charlie and Candace were good friends.
It's not debatable. They were." Now, that's a good thing to say, but also the whole thing about her getting taken off
the website two years ago is not true. It's just not true. She was not taken
off the website two years ago. We've been looking into this for the longest time. When Erica started doing her media
tour, that is the time that Candace got taken off the website. That was early
December. It's it's January 1st. She got taken off
the website a month, maybe a month and a half ago, six weeks tops.
Alex's actual reporting is she got taken off the website two weeks ago. And this
is what I mean. He's just making things up. And we used to live in a world when he would say something, we go, okay. But
now we have all these people who are actually looking into things and also doing the research. So now what he's
saying kind of falls flat all the time. So I'll just take you through this quickly. Uh he takes over the
conversation and he starts talking about everything he's done and how great he is. And that's not an exaggeration. He literally just starts talking about how
he broke the story on Cash Patel, stopping foreign investigations. He he's
the one saying that, you know, he's the one that's breaking all these stories. You know, basically just, you know, he
makes it all about himself right away because, you know, he doesn't want Elizabeth to actually defend Candace. He
doesn't actually want that to be happening. Then he says, uh, he tries to make up what Candace has said about
Brian Harpool. And Elizabeth quickly corrects him and, uh, then Elizabeth
goes, she quickly corrects him and says, "No, she didn't say that about Brian Harpole." She's like, "I know she didn't. I've been watching everything."
She quickly corrects him, but then she says, and this is true. If she's right or wrong, who cares what's the problem
if she's uh wrong about Erica Kirk and Brian Harpole? So what? And that got met
with silence from Bal. And then he goes, "Well, you know, they're innocent people and you know, exactly the same talking
points that Blake had. Exactly the same talking points. You know, it was uh it
was just very interesting to see him actually sit down with somebody who could think uh and not somebody who's
like one of his employees or like his gym partner or something like that because he fell apart. Um, now Alex is
mad." Oh, and then he starts talking about how we were calling him out and Erica, sorry, not Erica. Elizabeth
corrects him right away and she says, "But that's not Candace." And in regards to that, like that's me. I'm calling him
out. Various people are calling him out on X. Um, but she says that she says,
"That's not Candace." And then Bal actually says, "Oh, but she's amplifying it and she's promoting it. And if they
keep coming at me, I'm going to keep coming at her." That's the logic that he has. The logic is that if they keep
coming at me, I'm going to keep coming at her. It's It's literally like if
somebody was getting into a fight with you or or is trying to have a confrontation with you or they're
yelling at you and then you turn and you yell at somebody else and they're like, "Hold on, what did I do?" And you're
like, "Well, if if they keep yelling at me, I'm going to keep yelling at you." You'd be like, "What? Hold on. I but I
didn't do anything." Yeah, but they're they're doing it. So, as long as they keep doing it, I'm gonna keep doing it
to you. It makes no sense. And here's the thing. This is why I think there's
some kind of incentive being given to him because that clearly doesn't make any sense. Okay? Clearly doesn't make
any sense. But to him, he's like, "This makes perfect sense." And I think it's because he has marching orders. I think
it's because he knows that he has to keep going at her. And if he doesn't bring up us and people who are calling
him out, then he has no anchor to really he has no he has no way to tether
himself to Candace otherwise. So he's doing it through the people who support
her. That's why he said earlier in another video before, like a few days
ago, he was saying how uh oh, what did he say? He said h I can't remember. I
can't remember. Man, getting old is just the worst. It's just the worst. You know, you end up screaming at a screen
like Alex Jones. I can't remember. But he said something in regards to that. He was saying how her f Oh. Oh. He was
saying how her fans because they don't like what he's doing,
he's going to rip apart everything that Candace says and does because the fans
don't like it. Like it was just it's just this madeup thing. He's trying to manufacture something. Now, you could go
down the route of, well, he's just jealous and that's why he's doing this whole thing, but it seems to be so much
more than that. I mean, he was calling her the b- word the other day and all sorts of stuff like he's he's he's
really coming off as unhinged, and I think it's because there's some kind of incentive. Now, Ball says that, oh, and
then he goes into this whole thing of everybody has tried to recruit him. Uh, and then he says MI6 took his his star
reporter, and I don't know what that means. Is he talking about Owen or is he talking about uh who's the other person?
I think it's Chase. I wonder who he's talking about when he says that because that's a dig at them because obviously
neither of those guys have been, you know, taken in by that organization. But then he starts just going on about how
every single thing has tried to recruit him, every single organization that you can think of and he never gave in. And
you know what? Ending it here, I think that that's true. I think years ago that
was true. I think when he became a billion dollars in debt and he had all of this legal bearing down on him and
there was no no place to go and where it could turn to his jail time if he
doesn't have the proper funds. I think that changed things for him. I think
once this administration came in, it was very clear that he was walking the line
that they gave for him. They drew a line and they said, "You're gonna walk this line and you're gonna say these things
or else we're gonna allow the pressing to begin. We're gonna allow them to
press on you the way that they have." And I think he's taking again, I know I keep saying it, I think he's taking
marching orders now. I think that's exactly what's happening, man. Wild stuff. Wild stuff. Never
thought I'd be making uh videos about B. Never thought that would happen. And some people don't want to make videos
about him, but I'm honestly it's like I think this is crazy. I think I think it's nuts to be attacking Candace. And
it's not because I think Candace is right about everything, but it's like just allow someone to just figure out
what they're doing. Figure out who they're talking to, what avenues they want to go down. I again I've said this
before. This is as out of pocket and out of nowhere as if B. It would be the same
thing if Bax just started talking about Ian and he just started going at Ian. I
don't like I heard that you said uh something about him getting electrocuted. I don't like that. I don't
I don't like what's going on here. There's innocent people. Who Who are you implying? Are you insulting Are you insulting electricians all over the
world? What's going on here? It's like what? Like just leave them alone. or if Bal
started going at Baron, you'd be like, "What? What's happening right now?" Really weird stuff, man. So, I think uh
I I think 2026 is uh not going to be his year. You know, you know how people always say it's going to be my year. I
don't think it's going to be his year. I think this is where we're going to witness the falloff. And the same way
that right now, and I think I don't even know, he could have retired by now. The same way Anderson Cooper is doing his
thing, Don Lemon is somewhere doing his thing, uh, all those mainstream media
people are doing their thing somewhere. The same way that's happening, he will continue to do his thing, but we're
going to slowly stop listening. I think that's what's going to happen and we're just going to reminisce about a time
where, you know, that was a valid thing to listen to and now it's not. He's become radio. He's radio now and not in
a good way. Anyways guys, just wanted to make that for you. 2026, we're going to
be making more videos as always. I'll see you tomorrow.

[admin]

Massive Astroturf Campaign To SHUT UP Candace Owens EXPOSED!
The Jimmy Dore Show
Jan 1, 2026 #TheJimmyDoreShow

In this segment, Jimmy and Americans' Comedian Kurt Metzger argue that a coordinated, “astroturfed” media and influencer campaign was launched to discredit Candace Owens and whistleblower Mitch Snow after Snow claimed to witness key TPUSA security and political figures at Camp Huachuca shortly before Charlie Kirk’s assassination. He highlights posts from Evan Kilgore and others who reversed their support for Owens while allegedly coordinating messaging, and shows claims that many of these same accounts promote the betting platform PolyMarket.

Jimmy goes on to review accusations that PolyMarket is financially tied to Trump-world, citing Donald Trump Jr.-linked investments and the DOJ dropping charges against the company, while also noting pushback involving Tim Pool, Ian Miles Cheong, and other right-wing influencers. Jimmy frames the backlash as evidence that powerful interests are panicking over Owens’ investigation, asserting that coordinated smears typically indicate someone is “over the target.”



Transcript

I'm not making what Mitch said, Jimmy.
I'm not making those accusations. I'm
just saying that it's obvious that this
was a astroturfed coordinated hit job
because the powers that be are freaking
out over the fact that Mitch Snow caught
them at Camp Huachuca.
That's what
So, if you want to see how this paid for
Mockingberg 2.0 media works going
against Candace Owens, uh we'll show
you. But first, let me show you this.
This is a guy named Evan Kilgore who at
first was posting lots of stuff that was
supportive of Candace Owens asking
questions and investigating every lead
cuz that's what she's doing. People
like, well, what's her theory? It
doesn't matter what her theory is. She
wants to investigator investigates every
lead and sees where it goes. And if it
goes nowhere, then it goes nowhere.
Yeah. My theory is you're lying to me.
That's my theory.
Her theory is she's being lied to and
she's trying to find out why.
So Evan Kilgore says, "I this is a quick
example of how things work.
Never heard of him, by the way.
I wanted to get on here to say something
and know I will open myself up to
thousands of hate comments for it."
That's okay with me.
What I want to tell you is all I know is
that after a great deal of thought and
conviction, I can no longer support the
direction of Candace Owen's
investigation.
You can't support the direction of it.
What you mean her asking questions and
why we're being lied to? It's not the
Candace Owens investigation,
It's a thing about Charlie Kirk.
Yeah.
So, let's say that she got it wrong with
Mitch, whatever his name is. What
bearing does that have on I'm being lied
to by the FBI?
Nothing.
Uh, I have always been interested in
possible alternative narrative to
Charlie Kirk's assassin. That's the new
line, by the way.
Yeah, I don't trust the FBI either, but
Candace is crazy. That's the new one,
right?
Okay. It doesn't matter, though. She's
crazy. It has nothing to do with the
thing I'm I care about. I have likely
been her biggest supporter on X, sharing
her clips, blah blah. Many of her
questions, concerns, and criticisms I
have agreed with. In fact, virtually all
of them until Mitch Snow. So,
oh, obviously she's over the target with
Mitch Snow because the meltdown it
there's a couple things. When she
started talking about Egyptian planes,
they melted down over that.
And when she started talking about Mitch
Snow, whoa, they everybody came out
against her. I cannot I cannot justify
the thrust of that investigation. Okay.
Mitch Snow genocided Gaza. That's a
crime. Jimmy,
while watching Mitch Sher So if you
don't know who this Mitch guy is, Mitch
is the guy who was the uh former special
ops military guy. He was at that camp
Huachuca. Is that how you say it?
Huachuca.
Huachuca.
Huachuca. That's how you say it.
Huachuca and he claims he saw Erica Kirk
and the head of Charlie's uh security
team there at this military base where
they do all SCOPs and drone stuff on the
Nothing feels off about that at all to
me.
On the 8th of September, 2 days before
Charlie was killed and on the 9th of
September, he said he stumbled onto this
big highlevel meeting where a congressman
came out and he was blah blah blah.
So that's who this Mitch guy is. So,
while Mitch was sharing his testimony of
what he allegedly saw at Fort,
how do you say this?
Huachuca, everything felt off about it to
me. She's also said, by the way, Candace
Owens has said, "Hey, I don't know if if
his memory is correct or what, but we're
going to follow this lead
and see where it goes." So, again,
by the way, nothing hinges on this
and nothing hinges on nothing nothing
hinges.
We already know we're being lied to.
We already We already know the FBI
narrative is already a lie. And so she's
just following another lead. This is a
lead she's following. See where it goes.
So they're acting like Candace has come
to conclusions and she hasn't. She's
just following leads, which is what
every good investigator does. Until it
comes to a dead end, you stop following
it. And this might come Mitch's story
might come to a dead end.
But right now, it hasn't. In fact, all
the stuff they're saying about it, she
keeps disproving, trying to debunk
her, but the debunkers keep like
actually end up uh uh unwittingly
reinforcing Mitch's story. We're going to show you that in a second.
The burden improves on the government.
It's always has been even in a legal
sense with a a court case. The burden
improves on the government. Does
everybody understand that? It's not on
Kenneth Owen. She could just raise a
reasonable doubt if she wants if you
want to be all legal about it. So he
says, "I simply voiced
my concerns that Mitch might be lying to
Candace and was immediately met with
hundreds of hate replies and even
Candace Owens herself condemning me
looking into his past and who he says he
is." That immediately felt like maybe
there was some legitimacy into looking
into Mitch could if Mitch could be
considered a credible source. So I
reached out to several of Mitch's former
part. So, no, what you don't do is you
what you do is you look into his story
and if you could verify his story. Was
he there that day?
Yeah.
Were those people there that day? Are
there is there a record of him being
there that day?
You know why?
That that's how you check.
He's a scumbag he worked Yeah.
You don't call up his high school
sweethearts and ask if they have any
dirt on him.
That that's not how you investigate
this. But anyway, this is what this guy
did. Um, so I reached out to several of
Mitch's former partners and friends to
verify the story that Mitch is telling
to the world. First, they tried to say
he wasn't agree a military. He was okay.
Two nights ago, they responded to me and
shared dozens of messages, stories,
debunked many claims Mitch has made.
They even provided me with a police
report about an active case against him.
Okay. Mitch on all accounts, everyone
who knows him personally, including his
own family, is a compulsive liar,
manipulator, abuser, victim, and
all-around fraud and horrible human
being. Sounds like when they the stuff
they say about RFK.
Sounds like a Cheney is what it sounds
like.
Yeah, he's a psychopathic narcissist. I
believe is the in the true sense. After
definitely work for the government.
After sharing what sounds like he's
perfect for politics. After sharing what
those in his life told me about him, I
have been met with thousands of hate
comments, completely smearing me and
making the most of a So what?
I know this is not Candace directing her
followers to say these things, but it is
a culture she's created.
No,
no, it's the exact opposite. The exact
opposite. Now, I know you're a fake
and she is not responsible for the
behavior of her followers, though. And
the So, he's trying to That's called
speaking out of both sides of your
mouth. In the past 48 hours, I've been
accused of being paid off, being a
pedophile, getting the call, being a
fed, being a CIA asset, and many more
things. Uh,
those are the optimistic ones,
Uh, wait till you get called an
anti-semite. Uh, do you do you all
realize how insane and delusional you're
getting for merely questioning and
looking into Mitch Snow is being honest
about you? You don't understand that
that's what they're literally doing to
Candace Owens for the last 3 months is
exactly what you're complaining about.
They've been doing to her for just
following leads to see where they lead
because no one else is doing this
investigation. No, they because there's
a cover up happening with the FBI, which
is why Candace Owens has to do this.
Uh Jimmy, if it turns out that Mitch
Snow is actually an undercover satanic
PDF file, all that would prove to me is
he definitely worked at Fort Huachuca..
Yeah. Yes. Uh, do you not see the irony
hypocrisy here of behaving when people
ask their questions? Some of you are not
actually interested in the truth and
aren't interested in blah blah blah.
It's not a conspiracy. Mitch is just
likely a fraud like he always has been
and people are cautioning Candace. I
know she truly believes she's on to
something and it's okay to disagree with
her on this one. I do not believe Mitch
Snow is is the lead we have been
trusting. His story is falling apart.
people he claims to have seen are
providing alibis. All those alibis have
been debunked.
All their alibis, by the way, that that
that the congressman says he was at a
roll call. He wasn't. He wasn't there.
They he missed two roll calls. So the
congressman wasn't there. Um and nobody
else had anyway. I do not be a record if
you're doing off the book black ops like
you know murdering someone in broad
daylight which is a thing the government
engages in on the regular.
Um
so I also know many of you like
thousands will hate on me for this and
continue but of course I do not support
where Candace is headed and caution her
to prayfully take to some of her biggest
supporters concerns about Mitch Snow and
provide more public evidence about his
past the government case of blah blah.
Candace Owen says, "Hey, Evan, out of
curiosity, why were you coordinating
your Twitter posts yesterday via text
with other influencers?"
Oh,
Evan Kilgore, like from that movie Full
Metal Jacket. That's a weird fake name
to have, isn't it? Colonel Kilgore.
Uh, narrator, don't deny. Don't deny it,
Evan, or she will drop the receipt.
Oh, she has narrated his life, didn't
you?
Yes. Yes. Uh so and then Diligent Dennis
says evidence is emerging that
right-wing influencers were coordinating
with each other in a smear campaign
Friday and Saturday against the four
Huachuca whistleblower Mitch Snow. The fact
that entities would go through so much
effort to shut down Mitch proves that we
are over the target.
Yes, it does. That's
Yes, that that's actually what that does
prove. Otherwise, you're like, why would
this guy's a nut? He's always been a
nut. Nobody. this guy. What? What? I'm
going to Why would you pay him any mind?
I don't like the direction this is going
into a rabbit hole.
Yeah,
what a gaping rabbit hole these people
leave.
So, here it is. There appears to have
been a paid influencer campaign against
Candace Owens for Huachuca Charlie Kirk
whistleblower Mitch Snow. Yesterday, a
coordinated personal smear and disavow
campaign launched across social media
against Mitch Snow with some surprising
right-wing accounts coming out against
him. What's interesting is that these
same accounts also appear to be doing
paid promotions for Poly Market. It begs
the question, were they paid to come out
against Mitch Snow?
So, this is what Diligent Dennis is
saying, right?
Uh,
I am now speaking with one of Mitchell
Snow's ex- best friends. Spoiler alert,
there's nothing trustworthy about what
Mitt says about his past and no reason
to believe him now. I'm sorry. You can
hate me all you want. I'm interested in
the truth. That's Evan Kilgore. So,
that's not how you do an investigation
about what if a guy's saying is true.
Uh, so here it is.
[Music]
So, he's one of Here's the poly market.
Evan Kilgore reposted the poly market
breaking. The odds of Tim Waltz being
criminally charged are soaring amid the
expose revealing fake Somalian daycare
centers.
[Music]
I love and support Candace Owens and
have immense respect for her and her
work and the investigation into Charlie
K. I cannot in good faith get behind
Mitchell Snow. So this has been h so
this is their showing and then let's
watch the poly.
Oh, there she is retweeting Poly Market.
[Music]
So, uh,
they're they're also even even accusing
Tim Pool of this. So, I know I can't
I can't I'm not vouching that this
connection is real. I mean, it's real
that they're connected,
but whether they're whether they're
being paid by Poly Market to to launch
this obvious astroturfed campaign
against Candace Owens and Mitch,
uh, I can't I can't verify the veracity
of that. U, and so they even go after
Tim P, which come on, really? So, Trump
is up 11% on Poly Market. Holy So
they're insinuating that Tim P is on the
take going after Candace Owens because
of Poly Mark. I find that hard to
believe.
Oh my goodness. Extremely hard. And that
explains the red heer nonsense. I wonder
if they had to hit a red heer dust
bounty when they played that weirdo.
That was on Tim P. Couldn't believe it.
You ever hear that craziness?
No. that millennial Israel thing with
the third temple and they sacrificed the
red Bill Maher was complaining
about but apparently he also is into Tim
P had that on his show
so they're showing all the poly market
tweets he makes
is this a fixed gambling market Jimmy
I don't know
that you can affect with your tweets and
make bets
so there so this is what they're
claiming
so this is what they're claiming that
somehow. No, I don't. Again, I can I
that that seems hard to believe. Tim
Tim's worth a lot of money. I don't
know. I don't think he would.
No, he only got tricked once by Lauren
Chen's Russian people. You know,
I'm sure he knows better by now, right?
He keeps his park funded with other
means.
So, diligent Dennis says exposed another
one. Ian Miles, poly market promoter
attacking anyone investigating the
Charlie Kirk assassination and Mitch
Snow has been outed. This poly market
network is massive and seems to be
working with the Trump administration.
Ian Miles is a foreigner. How is this
legal? So here, let's
Oh, this fetal alcohol syndrome phase
guy. Yeah, he's always sucking up the
Elon.
So there he is. Yeah. Poly market. Poly
market. Poly market.
They will do anything for money. Oh,
these guys are good guys.
[Music]
So, I think this guy lives in where does
he live? Somewhere in like
Singapore.
Singapore. Okay.
He got in trouble for being too
pro-Israel cuz I guess you're not
allowed to be in Singapore. Some wild
Malaysia.
Really?
It's either Malaysia or Singapore. The
other Singapore.
So, that's a lot of polymarket tweets by
that guy. Well, he's a well-known
scumbag that pretends to live in America
and be abundant and sucks up to Elon.
So, he tweet he he tweeted out Kurt
Candace Owens thinks everyone who's
debunking her claims or criticizing her
as part of some vast paid conspiracy to
denigrate her credibility. No, she's
wrong. Everyone is doing it for free
because she's blatantly telling lies
about Erica K. They never say what the
lies are.
Okay. For Ian,
they never say what the lies are.
Yeah, of course. But for this guy to
even weigh in is just one of the
funniest things.
I mean, this guy is one of the biggest
lying sacks of that has ever
anybody that spent any time online with
these personalities knows this about
him. Even that piefaced idiot Jeremy
from the Quartering knows he's a a
fraudster. Even Jeremy, who's also on
here.
Uh,
so almost all of these Khan, Inc. or
right-wing influencers defending the Fed
slop narrative of the Charlie Kirk
assassination promotes poly market. Uh
here's another one. Uh
uh Jeremy, there he is.
Oh, this is the quartering guy.
Yeah,
that you were just talking about.
Yeah,
they're now So these are the people uh
who promote Poly Market are defending
the Charlie Kirk Fed slop narrative and
attacking Mitch Snow. Boy, the Mitch
Snow thing is a real tell. So when I saw
them all coming out at the same time in
the same coordinated effort
to obviously astroturf to go after Mitt
Snow at the exact same time, I'm like,
"Oh, this is there's they're really
afraid of this." Just like they're
afraid of the Egyptian planes. So
they're really afraid of it. So again,
if this was if he was garbage, no one
would care. And there certainly wouldn't
be tons and tons and tons of posts about
it. No one would care.
Did you ever see the original uh Get
Carter with Michael Kaine? No.
Oh, well, he got the best insult of all
time, which applies to Jeremy. Jeremy's
eyes look like piss holes in the snow.
Okay, here we go. Uh, now if you don't
believe Candace Owens, not only are you
not Christian, but you're part of a paid
influencer campaign. Haha. Whatever
happened to that elite squad of French
assassins, by the way?
Oh, not since uh Michael Rupert was
laughing about the idea he's a paid
husband.
Have I heard such convincing laughter
from a piss hole eyes here?
Uh here we go. There. There's all the
poly market tweets by the quartering.
Look at this artless giveaway of what a
jerk off he is. Look what it says. Same
thing. Uh Tim
[Music]
Uh,
oh yeah, this was all to glorify
Candace's podcast, Jeremy. That's a
great take on the notes you were told to
give. We We No one cares about Candace
like that other than when she's telling
the truth, everyone would back her and
when she stops, it'll be just like you.
You'll be
So, guess what? Uh important to note
that Poly Market is extremely tight with
the Trump administration with the Trump
DOJ just randomly reversing charges
against the betting platform this summer
and Trump family. So that's I didn't
know that Trump Department of Justice
randomly reversing charges against the
betting platform this summer. And there
it is. Poly market secures investment
from Trump Jr. backed 1789 capital.
Well, think of the insider trading you
could do on world events and social
things when you control all that.
Uh, there it is. Poly Marcus. Wow. That
was August 26, 2025. This is recent.
Yet another He's going to hawk to the
country yet again. That's the new thing
now is to hawk to a coin your own
country.
Trump administration ends poly market
investigation without charges.
Oo, there it is. That was July 15th. And
then just a month later, boom, Trump Jr.
gives a a a crap ton of money.
Oh, good. I think they're lamely going
after Tim Walt's corruption.
Here they are going after They're going
after Tim P again here. Tim P exposed as
another node in the Poly Market
Influence Network attacking Candace
Owens or skeptics of the official
Charlie Kirk assassination narrative.
This is a huge problem. This is
essentially a propaganda network linked
back to the administration and the
government. Oh,
now come on. When Tim got really mad at
Candace for ruining the midterms, that
seemed like genuine sincere rage to me
and not some kind of performative thing.
Jimmy,
I I I still don't Tim's worth a lot of
money.
Yeah, his great music is how he supports
his empire.
Let's Let's watch
uh update
uh update. Both Evan Kilgore and it's
Morgan Neria have admitted to working
for Poly Market. No kidding. Both claim
to have not been paid to promote Anti-M
snow content. The transparency about
Poly Market is appreciated. Do what you
will with it.
So they're saying of tomorrow.
So they're not they're saying they
aren't. But my question is why are you
coming so hard at so so love your
brother as yourself says. My question is
why are they coming so hard at Candace?
Does this have to do with the fact that
she's black?
Christ.
Come on. Are these guys so narcissistic
that they can't stand the thought that a
black woman keeps outsmarting them? I
think these are important questions to
ask. It's because she's effing with
their narrative. That's why. It's got
nothing to do with her being black.
This has to be fake. I I think it's
someone being sarcastic because it
actually is not an important question to
ask.
No, it's not.
There's something fake about it.
Whatever it is. Well, let's but let's
remember um
and the and the narrative is the
precious thing. So, they can't lose the
narrative. That is exactly what this is.
Aka the Matrix.
Yeah. So,
that's what the stupid matrix is. The
idiot narrative that the government has
spun around people that they still
believe to this day.
Did you ever see this clip from Charlie
Kirk? The Central Intelligence Agency is
actively involved in mind manipulation
of people here domestically and that is
completely against the CIA charter. We
must understand we have Congress and
they're just kind of like a peanut
gallery and then we have a super
government that exists above Congress of
the Department of Defense which is the
Pentagon, the Central Intelligence
Agency which is own thing out in
Langley, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. They run the country. The
intel agencies run the country.
Don't forget Israel.
When did he say that? I don't even
before he died.
I don't know. Let's listen to it again.
The Central Intelligence Agency is
actively involved in mind manipulation
of people here domestically. And that is
completely against the CIA charter. You
must understand we have Congress and
they're just kind of like a peanut
gallery. And then we have a super
government that exists above Congress of
the Department of Defense, which is the
Pentagon, the Central Intelligence
Agency, which is own thing out in
Langley, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. They run the country. The
They run the country. agencies around
the country.
So he So no wonder this guy got offed.
He was on to all of it. He was on to
that there was a standdown order given on
October 7th. He was on to it that it was
a genocide. He was uh on to it that he
could no longer support the Israel
project. He was on to it that the fact
that uh the intelligence agencies
actually are above Congress. This is
I've been saying this forever. What when
when you see a pe you know people like
oh they have secret meetings. No it's
called a session of congress. When they
get together at a session of congress
you think they're there doing the
bidding of students of workers of poor
people of the medically informed of
elderly. You think they're doing the
bidding of the of that? No. They're
there doing the bidding of the
billionaire class that also runs the
intelligence agencies.
Right. The other stuff Jimmy I believe
they handle at Epstein Island.
Yeah that's right.
So,
uh, again, I'm I'm not They really went
hard at Tim P. I don't I don't I don't
think it's I don't think Tim Pull's
being paid by Poly Market to uh
It's just uh Yeah, I know. It's weird.
He spent every civil unrest around the
world going back to the Erdogan riots
and including the Maidon coup. It's
weird to see all that and come to these
conclusions after you've seen all the
stuff Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate have
seen to come to such a bizarrely
milktoast supposedly fencitting
conclusion. How could that be?
Well, I'm not like that from just
hearing the actual real story. Imagine
being there and seeing it up close and
coming back and talking that
Now, I I can't uh Now, again, I'm not I
It's obvious to me that it was
astroturfed. The campaign against Mitch
and Candace this weekend on social
media, it's obvious it was astroturfed.
By who, I don't know exactly. And it was
coordinated and it was astrourfed.
I'll know which one of my friends is
stupid from who repeats it.
So, I don't Right. So, I don't know who
did it or what or who's taking money and
who's not. I'm not making what Mitch
said, Jimmy.
I'm not making those accusations. I'm
just saying that it's obvious that this
was a astroturfed coordinated hit job
because the powers that be are freaking
out over the fact that Mitch Snow caught
them at Camp Huachuca..
That's what this is about.
Jimmy, do you know how overly optimistic
I was that the government was uh using
some kind of carrier wave system over
your phone and TV to somehow program
people when in fact most of these
are doing it to hit a bounty on
a website? Most of these people
are just scum. It's not even under
control.
You saw how little it took for them to
buy to buy off Mockingberg 2.0 to get
them to be pro- soda sugar soda. Yeah.
And remember when so when RFK was going
to get SNAP, which is food stamps to
stop selling garbage food or stop
letting them buy garbage like sugary
sodas and and processed Yeah, we covered
that sweet and stuff. We covered that.
And so then there was this again one of
these coordinated astroturf campaigns
where people came out in favor of people
being able to buy whatever they want
which is the same people. And then it
turned out that uh Nick was that guy's
Nick something um he discovered that
they were all being paid and pittance
hundreds of dollars not thousands. They
were being paid hundreds of dollars to
go and post on social media being being
pro SNAP benefits being able to buy junk
food.
Hey, your doctor only got 750 ahead to
put poison in your kids. That's it.
That's all it cost for your doctor to
put a bioweapon in your child.
Nick Sorder. Nick, that's the guy. Nick
Sorder was the one who outed who's also
a right-wing media guy who has done good
work. Uh he he discovered this and he
outed it couldn't I couldn't believe it.
So, the fact that obviously there's a
coordinated astroturf campaign. Now, um,
by the way, this Kilgore idiot, if you
go to his ex profile, you can see
immediately he's a phony. I don't know
who thought he was good this whole time,
but his name sounds fake. And going to
his website, he was always a Zionist
the whole time. So, you should
have expected that from him. And and the
fact that someone retweets a poly market
is not evidence or I mean he even that
Evan Kilgar even agrees he even admits
yeah I work for them or that I do work
for them. Not that he's an employee of
theirs, but he's Anyway, so uh that's
interesting. But there's obviously I'll
say it one more time, an Astroturf
coordinated hit job, and they're
freaking out about Mitch Snow's
testimony about who he saw at Camp Huachuca.
Come see me on tour January 11th in Waikiki
Ki, February 20th in Lansing, Michigan,
February 21st in Milwaukee. Go to
jimmy.com for a link for tickets.
[Music]

[admin]

EVEN More SUPER SHADY Financial Dealings At TPUSA!
The Jimmy Dore Show
Jan 1, 2026 #TheJimmyDoreShow

New allegations have surfaced that Turning Point–affiliated political figures, including Arizona State Senator Jake Hoffman and Tyler Bowyer, are tied to a suspicious company called 110 LLC, which has reportedly received millions of dollars through a UPS Store mailbox rather than a legitimate business office.

Jimmy responds to the Wolves and Finance YouTube channel coverage of follows a series of financial findings suggesting shell companies, hidden, opaque PAC spending, and unexplained personal wealth increases connected to those involved with Turning Point entities. Jimmy ties these financial questions to events leading up to Charlie Kirk’s murder, noting that Kirk was pushing for a deeper audit into Turning Point USA’s finances shortly before his death and that there have since been ongoing efforts to avoid transparency.

The segment frames the situation as a major potential corruption scandal, demanding accountability, audits, subpoenas, and public answers from Turning Point leadership and state authorities.



Transcript

Apparently, we cannot ask about the
finances because of a Bible verse. Well,
Erica Kirk, how about this Bible verse?
Proverbs 29:1. Whoever stubbornly
refuses to accept criticism will
suddenly be destroyed beyond recovery.

Turning point,
you maybe remember uh we showed this
wolf and finance.com. They've been doing
deep dives into the finances behind
TPUSA, and they found a lot of shell
companies. And they found one company
that's getting millions of dollars from
TPUSA that went to a parking lot, but
now they say it's not a parking lot.
They say it goes to a UPS
mailbox. That's their company. So, let's
listen to he's got a followup on this.
So, let's listen. And uh it's about I'll
stop and start it, but it's it's a Here
we go.

In my videos, I've been talking
about a company named 110 LLC. This was
listed as one of the top independent
contractors for Turning Point with
payments of $1.5 million. I tracked down
the address for 110 LLC to the parking
lot of a strip mall. This address is
also listed in the financial disclosure
statement of Arizona State Senator Jay
Kaufman. I have seen everyone's comments,
and the internet has spoken that the
most likely explanation is that the
money is being sent to a UPS store
mailbox in that strip mall. So, I think
it is fair that we make that assumption,
that it is not being sent to the parking
lot, but the mailbox in the UPS store
because the address they gave didn't
exist.
The address they gave for that business
that they're sending the millions of
dollars with Jake Hoffman, this
state senator, it he listed every suite
in that strip mall as his office. So now
they're like, "No, no, no. It's going to
a UPS mailbox."

Okay. Turning Point has
not confirmed this. I don't know why
because that's such an easy thing for
them to say, but they remain silent. For
some reason, they're doing everything to
avoid talking about this UPS store
mailbox. What I find extremely
disturbing is that since these questions
have been raised, not a single person
from the accounting department at
Turning Point has made any statements.
The chief financial officer is a
politician, Justin Olsen. He's an
Arizona State Representative. Why has
the CFO said nothing? Not a single
person from the accounting department
has said anything. We have heard from
Andrew Kolvette. We've heard from Blake
Neff. We've heard from Tyler Bowyer. We have
heard from all these marketing people,
but no one from the accounting
department. I'm beginning to wonder if
the accountants are silent because they
know that anything they say can be used
against them in a court of law.

Arizona State Senator Jake Hoffman on X.com has
now made seven posts confirming that he
uses the UPS store mailbox for 110 LLC.
I will show you just one example. He
says, "You're a clown. 110 is a decade
old marketing company with many clients.
The address I use for mail and public
disclosures is a UPS store private
mailbox at that address." So, just so
you know what's going on, TPUSA is
sending millions of dollars to this
guy's company
that he says he's operating out of the
strip mall, but there was no office. And
now he's saying it's operating out of a
UPS mailbox.

Okay, just so you Okay,
by the way, tinfoil hat, just for the
record, Jake Hoffman, that's a victim of
CIA testing microwave energy weapons
on a guy. They put a chip in his head,
Leonard Kyle, and it mutilated his
brain. And he was smart enough to know a
metal trash can block it. And then the
funny form gave him tin foil. So we get
that humorous thing about kooky people
from a victim of the CIA. Mhm.
Just I think everyone should know that
every time I hear tinfoil hat
information the losers who created their
video hid from you. Take off the tinfoil
hat.

First of all, it is not a decade
old company, which I will prove in a
minute. That is a massive lie. It is
very strange that he would lie about
that. It's like he doesn't want people
to know how his company was formed. The
second thing that is strange is that in
all of his seven posts, he never
mentions Turning Point. That's the whole
point. The IRS forms tell us that
Turning Point sent $1.5 million, and the
only evidence this company even exists
is a UPS store mailbox. Why is everyone
going out of their way to avoid talking
about this $1.5 million?

We are back here in the parking lot and
Jake Hoffman is concerned that I am
hiding information from you. So, let's
talk about the UPS mailbox. Jake Hoffman
wants us all to talk about the UPS
mailbox. So, I'm going to show it to
you.

One of the reasons I've been so
hesitant to make this connection is
because of the massive implications. I
understand that small businesses use UPS
store mailboxes all the time, but this
is different. This is not your mom and
pop shop. This is not your typical small
business. This is an Arizona state
senator. He has a UPS store mailbox
where people are dropping off millions
of dollars. This is the mailbox. He is
operating his multi-million dollar
business out of this UPS store mailbox.
There's no location. There's no evidence
for this business other than this
mailbox. I do have to correct a mistake
I made in my previous videos. I made the
statement that there was no website for
110 LLC. I have discovered that is not
correct. There is a website. It's just
very hard to find. It is at 110.io
and I think it is very revealing. So the
website for this millions of dollars
business that they're getting from TPUSA
is 110.io. Not dot.com, not dot anything, dot.io.
And watch how hard it is to find
this.

On the website you can see a
sample marketing example with Turning
Point Action listed on the ad. I think
it is very suspicious that he is
advertising that if you pay him money
you are also going to get the support of
Turning Point Action. You should go
check this website out. There's not a
lot on it. It is literally one page.

What is even crazier is that if you look
the website up using the Wayback
Machine, you will see that the website
has not changed at all since 2021. I
will repeat, this marketing company has
not made a single change to its website
since 2021.

Additionally, the reason the
website is so hard to find is that it is
not indexed by Google. If you search on
Google site110.io,
you will receive zero results. So, this
supposed marketing company has a website
that you cannot search for on Google.
This really does not do anything to
convince me that this is anything other
than a fake shell company.

Jake Hoffman
has also explained that he does not give
out the address or details of his
operations because of political
persecution from what he calls the
insane murderous left. I'm sorry, J.
Hoffman, but that explanation is not
good enough. You are a state senator, and
you have to prove you are not taking
bribes. You cannot claim security
reasons as a shield to stop anyone from
knowing the details of your suspicious
business. This would be like if Donald
Trump decided not to let anyone know the
addresses for his hotels. You could not
know anything about his golf courses for
security reasons. That would be
ridiculous. You chose to live a public
life. You do not get to keep your
business a giant secret.

There's nothing
wrong with a state senator running his
own company, but it has to be an actual
business, and not a way for him to
launder money.

Let's assume that Jake
Hoffman is completely innocent. This is
still a stupid thing for him to do. It
is stupid. Just for appearance's sake, it
looks really shady. Imagine if Joe Biden
had a UPS store mailbox where people
would walk in and drop off millions of
dollars. Oh yeah, Joe Biden did have
multiple shell companies that didn't seem
to do anything, and we had hearings about
it for 2 years. How come all these
Republicans got upset over Joe Biden,
but no one wants to talk about what Jake
Hoffman is doing?

So, let's take a
closer look at 110 LLC. You can go to
transparencyusa.org, which shows
election related expenditures in the US
and state elections. 110 LLC received
over $4 million from Arizona election
campaigns and a small amount related to
Wisconsin campaigns. Now, this is just a
portion of the revenue that was reported
as part of state elections. We know the
actual revenue numbers for 110 LLC are
much higher because this doesn't even
include all the money paid to them by
Turning Point.

Another person I talked
about in my videos is someone named
Tyler Boyer. Just as a reminder, Turning
Point is made up of four main shell
companies and Tyler Bowyer is the COO of
Turning Point Action and America's
Turning Point. Tyler Bowyer is important
because the Turning Point shell
companies that Tyler Bowyer managed just
happen to be the same shell companies
paying 110 LLC. Let me show you how
Tyler Bowyer describes the first time
that he met Charlie Kirk.
"And I walked away from that. I can hitch
my wagon to this. I can hitch my wagon
to Charlie.
He was my best friend."

He says that he was going to hitch his
wagon to Charlie Kirk.
He said that he was Charlie Kirk's best
friend. We're going to see how good a
friend he was. And does anyone know what
this hand signal is? This is very
strange.

Then there is this clip where
he talks about Candace Owens.

What is a story that you have about
Charlie and Candace that Candace didn't
share?

Oh, there's a lot. I put one out. That
was right away. I was there with them.
It was like, you know, the three amigos.
I was with Charlie and Candace when we
went to TMZ that day with Candace and
Kanye, and you know Kanye was immediately
obsessed with Candace.
Tyler Bowyer describes himself, Charlie
Kirk, and Candace Owens as the three
amigos. And for proof of this, he
explains that he was there the day that
Candace met Kanye West. I find this
extremely strange because this is how
Candace Owens describes Tyler Bowyer.

"But it didn't make sense to me that Tyler
Bowyer lied about it and I don't trust
Tyler Bowyer. And that is
never going to change. Similarly with
Rob McCoy, he makes my skin crawl. I
can't explain it. I look at
him and he's a bad person, and nobody can
make me feel one way or the other about
that.

Candace says that she does not
trust Tyler Bowyer, and compares him to
Rob McCoy who she says makes my skin
crawl. So which one is it? Were they the
three amigos, or is Candace correct in
saying that you cannot trust Tyler
Bowyer? Which one is it?

I want to go back in time to 2017. A company was
created called We the People USA Inc.
This was a nonprofit corporation formed
in Arizona. This company is important
because when you understand what people
have done in the past, it becomes a
template for what they're likely to do
in the future. This company was created
with five directors, Mike Miller, Doug
DeGroote, Jake Hoffman, Dwayne
Farnsworth, and Tyler Bowyer. Mike Miller
and DeGroote are both current board
members of Turning Point USA. That is
why they are on there.

I've already explained who Jake Hoffman and Tyler
Bowyer are. I find Dwayne Farnsworth very
strange. He is a bankruptcy attorney in
Mesa, Arizona. Why is this random
bankruptcy attorney a director in this
company with Jake Hoffman and Tyler Bowyer?
It seems unusual.

Well, you might have noticed that he has the same last name
as the IT guy, Terrell Farnsworth, who
was present at Charlie Kirk's murder.
And he's the guy who took the SD cards
out of the cameras behind Charlie, and
then lied about why he did it. He said
the cops told him to do it, and the cops
said we didn't tell him. Then he said, "Oh,
I was afraid they were going to steal
stuff." Well, why wouldn't you just take
the whole camera? So that's who this guy
is and he's related. They got the same
last name as that guy who was on the
board of this shell company.

All right, here we go. Now, I don't know if these
two people are related. Maybe you
internet sleuths at home can figure that
out. But a lot of people have questions
about the IT guy, Terrell Farnsworth.
Like, why did he move the chair at the
crime scene to remove the SD cards with
the footage of the murder?
Why did he film a selfie video of
himself directly after the shooting?
He's dead. God, help him.
I find this extremely strange.

That was weird. I don't know if you
saw that, Kurt. Did you see that when it
that guy brought it up?
He made a selfie video of himself
reacting. What? at the time before we
were doing it of the other guy walking
off in the distance with blood on.
That was the Mikey McCoy walk.
Why did this guy do a selfie of himself
saying that? That's very strange.
Yes. Okay, here we go.

Who witnesses a shooting and immediately
thinks to themselves, I want to film a
selfie video of myself. I think that's
odd.

So, a lot of people have been
questioning why this IT guy acted so
strangely. Well, I can give you one
possibility. If his relative was
involved in shady business dealings on
the side with Tyler Bowyer, that could
explain it. But again, I don't know if
they're related or not.

The main point
is to show that Tyler Bowyer and Jake
Hoffman have a history of doing these
side businesses together. We have the
paperwork. This company was formed in
2017 and then it was dissolved in 2021.
That is strange, because 110 LLC was
created in 2021.
Here is the formation paperwork signed
by Jake Hoffman. I do not know why he
lied about this in his post on X.com and
said it was a decade old company. This
was formed 4 years ago. It was formed at
this address in Delaware next to several
other buildings Candace Owens has
identified in her podcast. Now, that's
probably unrelated, but it is still a
pretty strange coincidence.

Just to be clear, the Delaware address Jake Hoffman
is using is for Incorp, which is listed
on Delaware's website as a registered
agent who can set up one of these shell
companies. My question is, why does all
this shady stuff happen in Delaware?

So, at the same time the old company was
being shut down in Arizona, this new
company was being formed in the state of
Delaware. Because it was formed in
Delaware, all the partner information is
kept secret. We cannot see who is
involved.
That's why. But I don't think it is a
stretch to say that it is my opinion
that Tyler Bowyer was likely involved in
the creation of 110 LLC. If Tyler Bowyer
is a partner, that means that he would
receive a share of the profits of every
dollar that flows through that UPS store
mailbox.

Now, I don't have any evidence
of this, but there are some interesting
facts that you should know. I mentioned
in my previous video that Tyler Bowyer
lives in a massive mansion. I'm not
going to show it on the video, but you
can go look for it yourself. His address
is listed on the IRS 9990 forms. His
house is luxurious. There are multiple
buildings, a pool, a private basketball
court. Well, I have the paperwork from
when he bought his house, and this is
pretty shocking. It was also purchased
in 2021, 4 months after 110 LLC was
created. The property was worth $ 1.95
million, and he put a down payment of
$650,000.

Let me explain how wild this is. Here is
court paperwork from 2017 of a lawsuit
where Tyler Bowyer was involved. He had
been fighting this lawsuit since 2010
over some unpaid fees from a condo
development. The court order says, "The
exact condition of the judgment is
$1,41.32 as of June 8th, 2017." So Tyler Bowyer
owes this money and he was taken to
court. It was reported in the news that
his wages were garnished because of this
debt. So as of 2017, Tyler Bowyer was
struggling financially. This is not the
type of thing you see from someone who
has a lot of money.

This begs the obvious question. How in the world did
he get $650,000 in cash to use as a down
payment on his house? Do any of you find
this suspicious that someone in 2017 can
be broke and in 4 years have $650,000 in
cash? Tyler Bowyer needs to answer the
simple question, where did he get the
$650,000?

The first major customer of 110 LLC was
Kari Lake. Kari Lake at this time
was running for governor of Arizona. Kari
Lake had a super PAC called Put Arizona
First. Right before the primary, Put
Arizona First received a $2.3 million
donation. Put Arizona First then turned
around and gave the $2.3 million to 110
LLC.

Whoa. Wow. Okay.

And then the Cabal told her not to run,
remember?

Yeah. And then the
friends back east said, "Do we don't
want you running?"
Then Kari Lake got visited and
they offered her lots of money to not
run.
You remember that? She recorded it.
That's how we know about it.

Okay. So, this is Intel is what this
is. Yes. We still do not know who was behind
this $2.3 million donation. It came from
a company called SPH Medical LLC. Now,
if you were doing research, there's a
company in California called SPH Medical
that sells medical supplies. This is not
the same company. SPH Medical LLC is
another shell company out of Delaware.
And once again, everyone involved in the
company is secret. So, we have no idea
where the money came from. I find this
outrageous. I think the American people
deserve to know who gave $2.3 million to
Kari Lake. Who was it? Someone knows
who it was. Someone knows either at
Turning Point, Kari Lake's campaign, or
the Republican elite. Someone should be
able to tell us who gave this money, and
why it all ended up going to a UPS store
mailbox for 110 LLC. Isn't that wild?

Now, of course, Kari Lake won the
primary election, but what is
interesting is that her official
campaign did not hire 110 LLC to do
their marketing for the general
election. Kari Lake hired major
legitimate marketing companies with
active websites and offices and
employees. She still continued to pay
110 LLC, but at a much lower level, and
she ended up losing the general
election. This was the start of a lot of
different campaigns that 110 LLC
received money from in Arizona politics.

For instance, one customer was David
Farnsworth. Here's a poster from Turning
Point Action for David Farnsworth. Why
are all these people with the last name
Farnsworth doing business with Tyler
Bowyer? So, we have all these candidates
paying money into this UPS store mailbox
to send to 110 LLC, and then Turning
Point is also supporting their election
campaigns. It is almost like they are
all working together.

Here's the problem. If any Turning Point employees
are also receiving money from 110 LLC,
that would be kickbacks.
Yes, that would be Turning Point employees
getting rich off these election
campaigns. Again, I don't have any
direct evidence of this, but we could
know for sure with a simple question.
Are any Turning Point employees
receiving money from 110 LLC?

I'm going through all of this history so that you
understand that this was the financial
infrastructure that was already in place
when Charlie Kirk was murdered. So, the
old company was closed. This new company
was formed in Delaware. Suddenly, Tyler
Bowyer has $650,000 in cash and 110 LLC
receives $2.3 million from Cary Lakes
Super PAC. The obvious question is, did
any of that $2.3 million somehow make it
into Tyler Bowyer's pocket?

But there is another shell company that we have not
even talked about yet. Turning Point
Pac. This is a political action
committee, and we know from Tyler Bowyer's
Instagram profile that he is also
involved in this company. We can see how
Turning Point Pac spends money on
federal campaigns by looking on
opensecs.org. And surprise surprise, we
can see that the majority of the
expenditures for Turning Point Pac are
being sent to the UPS store mailbox for
110 LLC. They paid $1.1 million in the 2022
election cycle, and $2.1 million in the
2024 election cycle. So, if you've been
keeping track, the amount of money
Turning Point has sent to 110 LLC has
now increased from $1.5 million to $4.7
million.
How is this Arizona State Senator with
no office helping out on all of these
federal campaigns? No office.
Am I the only person who finds it crazy
that there are millions of dollars
flowing through this UPS store mailbox?

The person who could answer these
questions very easily is Arizona
Attorney General Chris Mayes. She could
issue a subpoena for the accounting
records at 110 LLC and Turning Point, and
give us the answers to everyone's
questions. Since people have been
raising these questions, she has done
nothing. We have not heard a word from
Chris Mayes. What is she doing? Honestly,
what does she do all day long? Is she in
her office drinking margaritas? Is she
going to look into the questions about
Turning Point? Can we at least get a
strongly worded statement from her?
Anything.

Fast forward to Charlie Kirk's
murder. What I pointed out in my
previous videos is that in the months
leading up to Charlie Kirk's murder,
there were strange things happening in
the financials at Turning Point. There
was the unusual transfer of $8.6 million
from Turning Point USA. So, 8.6 million
from Turning Point USA to America's
Turning Point that Tyler Bowyer ran, but
Charlie Kirk was not on that.
Isn't that wild?

Okay, just so you know, that's the main turning point, Turning
Point USA. And there's all these other
companies.

Okay, America's turning
point. There was the unusually high
employee expense for Tyler Bowyer Shell
Company that we still cannot explain.
There was all the money that was sent
from Tyler Bowyer Shell Companies to 110
LLC. I believe these transactions
culminated in the memo that Charlie
Kirk issued eight days before he was
murdered where he appointed a new COO of
Turning Point USA, Justin Stripe, and
requested a new Doge style audit.
So he caught on to this. He caught on to
the millions and millions of dollars
coming in and being funneled around.
And then he orders a Doge
style audit of Turning Point USA and all
their shell companies. And eight days
later, he's killed.

And by the way, they're not doing the doge
style audit. Erica Kirk is not doing it.
Why would they?
Why would they? Here we go.
Well, it's her family.
It's her family. Yeah.
I was told it belongs to Intel. That's
what I was told. Yeah. Here we go.

Now, anyone who has worked in corporate
America knows what that memo implies.
That is the typical memo that you see
when you discover someone is stealing
money from the company. Yes.
You replace their position, you start a
new audit, and you work on moving that
person out of your company.

Now, Tyler Bowyer has responded to this allegation
with this post on X.com. He says, "Made
up. I haven't been COO of TPUSA for over
3 years. You're listening to people
making things up."

He posts a screenshot
of his LinkedIn profile as evidence
showing that he was the chief operating
officer of Turning Point Action since
July 2022, implying that he had nothing
to do with Turning Point USA or Charlie
Kirk's memo. I find Tyler Bowyer's post
ridiculous. We were not born yesterday.

To my knowledge, since Tyler Bowyer's
change in title in 2022, no one has held
the position of COO at Turning Point USA
until Charlie Kirk's memo of appointing
Justin Strife. And anyone who has worked
in corporate America knows that if you
get a title change, and no one backfills
your position, you still end up doing
your old job. So, it is still likely
that Charlie Kirk's memo was attempting
to minimize Tyler Bowyer's influence at
the company.

What is even more compelling is that Tyler Bowyer's post is
contradicted by his own words. The
Washington Post obtained a secret audio
recording of Tyler Bowyer. This is from
late 2022 after his supposed change in
title. Take a listen.

I'm happy to share with you the history
because like I've bottom up. So, you
realize you're talking to the guy who
basically runs everything.

Notice he is talking specifically about
Turning Point USA, not the other shell
companies. And he says, "You are talking
with the guy who basically runs
everything." This is Tyler Bowyer in his
own words months after he supposedly
changed his title. So, which one is it,
Tyler? Were you lying then, or are you
lying now, or are you just lying all the
time?

The Washington Post also recorded
Tyler Bowyer saying this.

And honestly, I
have giant balls, and I don't care. I
walk in and talk to anybody. I'm a
transparent piece of glass here on
everything that I do, and everything I'm
involved with.

So, apparently he has giant balls. I'm
just going to put this out there.
He does not sound like a very nice
person. And if he's so transparent, why
doesn't he explain why he is sending
$4.7 million of Turning Points money to
a UPS store mailbox?

What makes all of this so suspicious is the actions of
Erica Kirk. She still refuses to do
Charlie Kirk's final wish that he wrote
in that memo, a Doge style audit of the
finances at Turning Point. This would be
so easy to do. You bring in an
independent third party. It takes a
couple of months. It would calm
everyone's concerns over the finances.
Why does she refuse to do an audit? The
only reason I can think of is that it
will uncover criminal activity. When
Erica Kirk is asked about the issues at
Turning Point, she says something like
this.

It reminds me so much of chapter 6
in the book of Nehemiah. He is building
a wall and the town's people are at the
base of that hill saying 'Nehemiah,'
calling him all these names, saying all
these things, 'come on down.' Every single
time he had the same message, four times
in a row, 'I cannot come down. I am busy
building.' That is how I feel. I do not
have time to address the noise. My
silence does not mean that I am
complacent. My silence does not mean that somehow
Turning Point USA and all of the
handpicked staff that loved my husband,
and my husband loved them, is somehow in
on it.

Apparently, we cannot ask about the
finances because of a Bible verse. Well,
Erica Kirk, how about this Bible verse?
Proverbs 29:1. 'Whoever stubbornly
refuses to accept criticism will
suddenly be destroyed beyond recovery.'

Turning Point is a taxpayer subsidized
nonprofit. We have every right to demand
the CEO answer our questions about some
pretty obvious financial irregularities.
Turning Point keeps claiming that they
already do an annual financial audit
with the accounting firm Baker Tilly. In
the opinion letter from Baker Tilly,
they say that nothing is wrong, and there
are no problems at Turning Point.
Of course, they did.
But sometimes annual audits miss things.
They make mistakes, too. And if they did
miss something, they are actually
incentivized not to report it because
then it makes them look bad. That is why
it is a good idea to rotate your audit
firms occasionally to new firms.

Bringing in an additional Doge style
audit would be such an easy, simple
thing for Erica Kirk to do. It's clearly
what Charlie Kirk wanted. I think it is
extremely suspicious that she still
refuses to do an audit.

Now, to be clear, all of this is circumstantial
evidence. Currently, I do not have any
direct evidence of a crime. But the real
question is this. Given all the facts I
have laid out, what is the more likely
possibility? That Tyler Bowyer is
completely innocent, or that he's doing
something shady? Let me know in the
comments down below if you have more
information.

Oh, there you go. Great job.
Yeah, he's clearly a handler. That's
what that's called, a handler. You have
more than one sometimes. Yeah, of
course I'm in charge of Turning Point
officially. He's in charge of two shell
companies in Turning Point, but he's
telling people he's in charge of the
whole thing because he's a handler.
That's what they call that in intel
work, which is what this is.

It certainly looks like
they're getting kickbacks.
It looks like again I can't say that,
just like he said on the video,
all those faith leaders those worthless
phony Christian faith leaders that go to
TPUSA, that aren't Christian, and are in
fact devil worshippers, they
all get in on that scam of being taxfree,
and then they get money
from the Moonies in South
Korea. Steve Bannon knows all about
their connections which are so dirty and
bad it it's just like Joe Biden's creep his
creepy son who was bag man for the CIA.
That's why the pardon's going to stand,
and nothing's going to happen to any of
them. You understand? Like the Cabal,
you know, you can't spell cabal without
it's Cabala. It's short for Cabala.
That's what Cabal means.

So, great job by Wolf and Finance, Wolves
in finance. And it's just
that Jake Hoffman guy, that the state
senator, like no, it's my business. We
had him for 10 years only four years.
Oh, no. I run this multi
multi multi multi-million dollar
operation out of a mailbox
at the UPS in the strip mall.

Remember they sold all their water to
some Arab. Oh, remember that? They remember that?
They're a real bad corrupt state.
I mean Arizona was selling water rights.
Yeah. And I just happen to do it out of a mailbox in
a strip mall. And the website for my
business hasn't been changed for five
years. And you can't find it, by the
way, if you Google it. I'm a
marketing guy, and I made sure nobody can
find my marketing website.
Really?
My script is about a cutout that
is just like that. If you can find them,
maybe you can hire my cutout member.
You're going to be playing the
the creepy oligarch in that. Looking forward.

So there you have
it, ladies and gentlemen. More
creepy stuff coming out of TPUSA. And if
you'd like to hear my jokes about this,
come see me January 11th in Waikiki.
February 20th in Lansing, Michigan.
February 21st in Milwaukee. Go to
jimmy.com for a link for tickets.
Come see me on tour. January 11th in
Waikiki. February 20th in Lansing,
Michigan. February 21st in Milwaukee. Go
to jimmydore.com for a link for tickets.
[Music]

[admin]

How Trump’s MAGA movement helped a 29-year-old activist become a millionaire
by BRIAN SLODYSKO
Associated Press
10/10/23 10:54 AM ET
https://thehill.com/homenews/ap/ap-poli ... llionaire/

[x]
FILE - Former President Donald Trump, right, shakes hands with Turning Point CEO Charlie Kirk before speaking during the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit, July 23, 2022, in Tampa, Fla. The nonprofit rocketed to prominence by latching on to Trump’s 2016 campaign and has raised roughly a quarter-billion dollars since, much of it spent cultivating conservative influencers and hosting glitzy events. The organization also enriched Kirk and his allies, according to an Associated Press review of public records. (AP Photo/Phelan M. Ebenhack, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Charlie Kirk’s $4.75 million Spanish-style estate is tucked away in a gated Arizona country club that charges nearly a half-million dollars for a golf membership. It boasts a guest casita, a “resort-style” pool and striking views of the Sonoran Desert.

The Make America Great Again political movement has been lucrative for Kirk, the 29-year-old CEO and co-founder of the conservative youth organization Turning Point.

The nonprofit rocketed to prominence by latching on to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and has raised roughly a quarter-billion dollars since, much of it spent cultivating conservative influencers and hosting glitzy events. The organization also enriched Kirk and his allies, according to an Associated Press review of public records, which found top Turning Point officials collected pricey salaries, enjoyed lavish perks and steered at least $15.2 million to companies that they, their friends and associates are affiliated with.

But for all that money, the group has struggled to help Republicans win general elections. That’s particularly true in Turning Point’s adopted home of Arizona, where its slate of deeply conservative candidates in the longtime Republican stronghold lost statewide races last year, among them Kari Lake’s unsuccessful bid for governor.

Now, as its leaders age out of the youth movement, they are attempting to leverage Turning Point’s connections and fundraising might to branch out. Ahead of the 2024 election, they are pitching a $108 million get-out-the vote campaign that would expand beyond Arizona to the swing states of Georgia and Wisconsin.

“Any donor who thinks an organization needs $108 million for a three-state grassroots get-out-the-vote campaign is being taken advantage of,” said Erick Erickson, a nationally syndicated conservative talk radio host and frequent Trump critic. “It sounds like a grift.”

While Turning Point isn’t the first organization to draw scrutiny over spending, it has become a unique source of frustration for some Republicans. They point to its support for far-right candidates who struggled in marquee races, as well as the hefty sum it now seeks to do work that is already being done by veteran operatives. That sets up a potential clash between competing wings of the conservative movement that could complicate the GOP’s effort to hold a House majority while reclaiming the Senate and the White House next year.

In a statement, Turning Point spokesman Andrew Kolvet said none of the group’s leaders have inappropriately benefited from their financial arrangements. If anything, he said, many were underpaid for their talents, including Kirk.

“If the so-called ‘experts’ know what it takes to build successful ballot chasing teams, why are conservatives apparently so bad at it?” Kolvet said. “Why are we getting lapped by progressives in spending and in (get-out-the-vote) operations in key states and counties?”

Turning Point was founded in suburban Chicago in 2012 by Kirk, then 18, and William Montgomery, a tea party activist, to proselytize on college campuses for low taxes and limited government. It was not an immediate success.

But Kirk’s zeal for confronting liberals in academia eventually won over an influential set of conservative financiers. It helped that the group operated solely as a nonprofit charity at the time, offering a tax write-off for contributions while cloaking donors’ identities from disclosure.

Despite early misgivings, Turning Point enthusiastically backed Trump after he clinched the GOP nomination in 2016. Kirk served as a personal aide to Donald Trump Jr., the former president’s eldest son, during the general election campaign.

Soon, Kirk was a regular presence on cable TV, where he leaned into the culture wars and heaped praise on the then-president. Trump and his son were equally effusive and often spoke at Turning Point conferences.

Contributions to the group doubled and then tripled — eventually climbing to $79.2 million in 2022, according to an analysis of publicly available tax filings. The group states that it now has a presence on nearly 4,000 high school and college campuses, operating as a conservative lifestyle brand that promotes hundreds of online influencers.

As their finances grew, Turning Point events became more ornate, taking on a nightclub atmosphere with strobe lights, pyrotechnics and thousands of young conservatives in attendance, many of whom had their expenses at least partially paid for by the group.

Compensation also soared, with Kirk’s climbing from $27,000 in 2016 to more than $407,000 by 2021, tax records show. Millions of dollars more were paid out to a cluster of companies linked to a handful of group leaders and their allies, according to tax documents and business filings.

Kirk bought three high-end properties, all worth over a million dollars, which include his new Spanish-style mansion near Phoenix, as well as a nearby apartment and a beachside condo on Florida’s gulf coast.

Kolvet said that much of Kirk’s wealth was derived from his successful podcast and radio show, as well as public speaking fees, though he declined to provide earnings figures. Still, Kirk used his platform at Turning Point to help launch those ventures, which occupy a considerable amount of his time and could conflict with the 75 hours a week that Turning Point says Kirk spent working on organization business in 2022, the most recent year tax data is available for.

Specifics about how exactly Turning Point spends its money — and who benefits — are often difficult to discern because the IRS does not require nonprofit groups to publicly disclose detailed accounts of their expenditures. Meanwhile, many of Turning Point’s biggest vendors are limited liability companies that are registered in states that do not require public disclosure of ownership.

The group also adopted an opaque organizational structure, including a series of interconnected nonprofit groups, political action committees and a for-profit Turning Point merchandise company, which does not have to publicly report its finances.

One branch, the Turning Point Endowment, held more than $55 million in reserve in 2022, while donors were courted to give more.

Kolvet said the money was part of Turning Point’s “50-100 year plan to continue reaching generation after generation of young Americans.” He added that the organization’s leaders were “good stewards of donor money.”

While building for the future, however, Turning Point has shown a willingness to spend lavishly.

In 2019, the group stated that its leaders would travel first-class or by charter plane, explaining later that it was needed in “certain circumstances” to “ensure the uninterrupted success of the organization’s mission.”

In 2021, Turning Point sponsored a wedding reception for Kirk and his wife, Erika Frantzve, at the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess luxury hotel, which was also billed as a ninth anniversary celebration and fundraiser for the organization, according to an invitation obtained by the AP.

Kolvet said the event was separate from the couple’s small wedding ceremony, describing it as an “elegant and gracious way for Erika and Charlie to mark a landmark in the life of TPUSA (the 9th anniversary) while also inviting a much larger group of friends and family to celebrate a landmark in their own lives.”

Other expenditures defy easy explanation.

A $999,000 payment was made to a limited liability company in Nevada for a “research project on educational outputs,” according to 2020 tax documents. The company, called Clocktower LLC, was dissolved in 2022 and the only corporate officer listed in its business filings is the president of a firm that advises on tax avoidance strategies.

Nicholas R. Miller, who is listed as the “manager” of Clocktower LLC, did not respond to a request for comment.

“Any insinuation that anyone” at Turning Point “benefited from this is defamatory,” Kolvet said.

In 2020, Turning Point paid Donald Trump Jr. $333,000 through his company Pursuit Ventures. Kolvet said the money was used to purchase copies of a book he wrote that was offered as a gift during a fundraising drive.

Another individual in the former president’s orbit, Trump’s former bodyman John McEntee, also collected $107,500 for consulting work between 2021 and 2022, records show.

In one case, the money was used for purposes that belie the anodyne descriptions included in tax documents.

During the 2020 presidential campaign, Jake Hoffman, one of the group’s primary outside consultants, recruited teenagers to spread false information online about voter fraud and the coronavirus pandemic. That led Twitter and Facebook to suspend numerous accounts, as previously reported by the Washington Post.

Hoffman was paid $2.4 million during that period through his former company Rally Forge, according to tax documents that listed the purpose of the expenditures as “digital education,” “media” and “ad placement.” Now an Arizona state senator who also served as a fake elector for Trump, Hoffman has been paid at least $6.6 million by Turning Point since 2017, campaign finance disclosures and tax records show.

Hoffman did not respond to a request for comment made through his state Senate office.

Other high-ranking employees also received a growing share of the organization’s wealth, according to business filings and tax documents.

Montgomery, Turning Point’s co-founder, collected over $700,000 in compensation as well as payments to his companies, an arrangement ProPublica previously reported. He died in 2020.

Stacy Sheridan, Turning Point’s senior advancement director, is listed as a corporate officer for three limited liability companies that have received at least $2.7 million since 2018. She earned $180,000 in compensation during Turning Point’s 2018 fiscal year. Subsequent salary figures have not been disclosed. Sheridan did not respond to a request for comment.

Joshua Thifault, Turning Point’s senior director of major gifts, earned $443,000 between 2021 and 2022. A company he controls received an additional $129,000 for fundraising work during that time. Thifault did not respond to a message seeking comment at a number listed to him.

Benny Johnson, Turning Point’s former chief creative officer, collected at least $486,000 in compensation from the organization. Arsenal Media Group, a firm Johnson said he co-founded and helped operate, received $613,000 in payments between 2020 and 2021, according to tax records and an archived copy of his personal website.

In a statement, Alex Lorusso, a spokesman for Johnson, said he was “never an owner or executive of Arsenal Media” and “any work Benny did with Arsenal was as an independent contractor.”

Legal experts say the payments could potentially pose a problem under federal tax regulations.

Though enforcement is rare, payments made to companies controlled by those with “substantial influence” over a nonprofit’s operations could violate IRS rules related to “self-dealing” if the payments are deemed to be excessive.

As Kirk’s star has risen, Tyler Bowyer, Turning Point’s chief operating officer, has assumed a greater role in the organization. Like Kirk, his improving financial circumstances coincided with Turning Point’s fundraising success.

Now in his late 30s, Bowyer endured several financially rocky years, losing two condos to foreclosure in 2011 amid a divorce. His wages were garnished after a home ownership association sued him for thousands of dollars in unpaid fees, according to property and court records.

He now operates Turning Point’s political arm, earning compensation of $255,000 in the group’s 2022 fiscal year. In 2021, he purchased a $1.95 million “urban farm” in Mesa, Arizona, after placing a $650,000 down payment, according to property records. And he has a 2020 Tige ski boat, which sells on the used market for as much as $200,000, that is held under his wife’s name, loan collateral documents show.

Kolvet said Bowyer’s home is not as fancy as it appears, requiring a “badly needed” renovation that he can’t currently afford. He shares the Tige ski boat with his wife’s family, which costs him only $350 a month, Kolvet said.

Bowyer, who is an Arizona representative to the Republican National Committee and also served as a fake elector for Trump, is now helping lead a commercial endeavor that could prove lucrative.

Business filings show Bowyer recently became chairman of the board for Superfeed Technologies, a mobile app maker that developed the platform Turning Point will use to manage get-out-the-vote campaigns, like the $108 million effort they are now raising money for. Kirk’s mother-in-law also sits on the board.

Kolvet said that Turning Point’s leaders, as well as Kirk’s mother-in-law, have not “earned a dime” from the company, viewing their work as “a form of charity for the conservative movement.”

Turning Point’s machinations have sounded alarms from their more established rivals, who view the organization as inexperienced when it comes to running a successful general election ground operation.

Last year, Turning Point operated a get-out-vote campaign in Arizona and a handful of other states. But operatives saw little indication that the group was leading the robust operation it claimed. The digital platform they used for canvassers to gather voter data at the time was barely used, according to internal documents obtained by the AP.

Others, including Jon Seaton, a former aide to Arizona Sen. John McCain, said the amount of money sought by Turning Point was objectionable.

“$108 million? I can’t even fathom it,” said Seaton, who specializes in get-out-the vote efforts. “There’s not even enough doors” to knock on.

___

Associated Press writer Jonathan J. Cooper in Phoenix contributed to this report.

[admin]

Here’s What EVERYONE Is Missing About Candace Owens Investigation!
The Jimmy Dore Show
Jan 5, 2026 #TheJimmyDoreShow

Is Candace Owens being unfairly attacked for hosting an open-source investigation rather than presenting finalized conclusions? Jimmy thinks so, emphasizing that Owens' role is to surface leads and tips that the broader community can then investigate. He highlights commentary from “Jesse On Fire,” who explains that Owens acts as a central hub for vetted clues, while viewers collectively verify, debunk, or confirm them without turning disagreements into infighting.

Jimmy goes on to criticize media figures and influencers who frame unverified leads as proof of incompetence or malice, claiming this division serves institutional interests that want investigations shut down. He concludes that discrediting Candace is a strategy to derail collective inquiry, arguing that real investigations require following every lead to its end—even ones that go nowhere.



Transcript

Candace is not responsible for every
single thing that she puts on her show
being accurate. That's not what she
does. That's why people who watch
it, they're like, She's not even saying what her
theory is." That's exactly right. She is
the central point of an open-source
investigation. She is putting on her
platform what the clues are, and then we
go chase them down.

So, we've heard it. We've seen the
controlled astroturf paid for attacks on
Candace Owens and they make no sense
because what she's doing is what
you're supposed to do, follow leads
wherever they go. And if they go to a
dead end, then it's a dead end. But
people don't want her following leads
because it will lead somewhere that they
don't want. Possibly Israel, possibly
the FBI, possibly the military, possibly
the people at TPUSA, possibly the head
of his own security, Brian Harpole.
We don't know where it's going to lead,
but it's it that's what they're afraid
of us finding out. And here's the best
defense. So, this guy, he does a
great job here. This is Jesse on fire.
Let's listen to how he defends Candace
Owens. And uh I think he makes a lot of
sense here.

The people who are attacking Candace
fundamentally do not understand what her
role in this entire thing is. She is the
magnetic center of an open-source
investigation. She is not supposed to
only put pure factual information on her
show. She puts clues on her show. That's
right. She has a tip line getting
thousands of tips every single day. She
does her best to vet the ones that come
in and then she puts those on her show
and then the community chases them down.
It doesn't matter if you don't believe
this one or you do believe this one.
It's your responsibility to chase down
the ones that you do believe and you
look into them and then you share them
with other people and then they share
them with Candace and then we develop
the case that way. We're solving this
together. Stop attacking her. The only
way that we allow this whole thing to
fall apart is if people start fighting
with each other over individual clues,
which is exactly what's happening. So
there's the mockingberg 2.0 media that
are just controlled to go after her.
Some of them are being paid. Some of
them are being threatened, whatever. Uh
then you have the people who are in good
faith thinking, "Oh, what she said there
doesn't make sense." Yeah. Well, so
what? You don't fight each other over
it. That's what they want us to do. We
are an open-source detective agency.
We've never had the opportunity to do
this before. Okay? From this point
forward, if people are attacking Candace
because she put something on her
channel, they are blowing it. and people
who are on cannite and you're attacking
people who did an investigation into a
clue that she put on the platform.
You're also blowing it. That is not what
this is supposed to be. She's doing
exactly what she's supposed to do. Okay.
If you took money to attack Candace, I
guess that is uh that ship is sailed.
Attack her all you want. You know, don't
expect people to put a lot of faith in
uh the credibility of things that you
say going forward. Okay. Here, let me
start by saying this. Alex Jones is
going full throttle on Candace right
now. He's like he's he's going hard in
the pain. He started off, you know, like
he's like Candace is my friend. I wanted
to like reach out to her because she's
going crazy. She's doing whatever. And
bottom line is even with that, he
doesn't understand what Candace's show
is and what it's not. Okay.
Like I said, I said yesterday in my uh
in my video that I did about the TPUSA
financials that Wolves and Finance did,
I called this the first ever open-source
investigation. Okay? And I meant exactly
that. Okay? What this is, we never have
had the opportunity to get the in the
collective internet, all of the all of
the mommy sloohs, all of the, you know,
all the men who are interested in the
gun stuff, interested in the 30-6 stuff,
interested in the lies that that that
this person told, this person told.
People looking into this string, they
pull on this string, they pull on this
thing, they pull on this string, they
pull on this string. Okay? And all of us
collectively, we figure out what's real
and what's not. Okay? So, when Candace
says something on her show or puts
someone on her show and then that tip
ends up not being accurate, that doesn't
mean anything negative about Candace
because that's not her job. Okay? Her
job Candace is the lightning rod magnet
of all of the community tips, okay? like
everyone wants to give her their
information and ultimately what she is
do. I don't even know if this is how she
looks at her her show, but I know that's
how everybody should be looking at it
and it's how I look at it, which is why
I couldn't understand why anyone saw
what I was what myself or Nate was doing
as attacking Candace. I didn't
understand. I'm like, what? Because the
way I see her show is Candace will will
she gets every tip on earth and she vets
them and if she can verify enough about
a tip or about a person or whatever then
she puts it on her show and she says
this guy says that he saw this and he
saw saw this. I verified he's at Fort
Woo guy verified that he was a Green
Beret. Here is his story and the reason
he's on there like what no one knows
what that would mean. What she's she
puts him up and then we go investigate
him. That's the whole point. That's the
whole entire point. Okay. She said that
50 times. She's like, I'm not saying
that he saw Erica or he saw Brian
Harpool. I'm saying he saw that he did
and I verified that he was actually at
Fort Wuka and I verified that he really
was a Green Beret. So like here it is.
And everybody's like, "Well, so what
does it even mean?" Like last night, you
know, everybody's like, "So what does it
even mean if he's at Fort Wuk?" It
doesn't matter. That's the whole point.
That's for all of us to figure out if it
matters. Like that's that's what this
entire thing is. We're we're
investigating this together. all of us,
every single person that's interested in
this case. This is not about fighting
with each other about who's right and
who's wrong. Okay? If if a string gets,
you know, put on her platform and it's
like, I heard that this, this, and this.
I heard that there are Egyptian planes
that are falling. I heard that there are
this that are following. I heard this.
Then everybody goes and investigates it.
If you find out that the Egyptian planes
were not following Erica Kirk, that
doesn't mean it that's not like that's
not a gotcha on Candace. That's not her
job. How many people does
Candace have working for? Do you have
any idea how much stuff we've learned
about the Charlie Kirk case since this
happened? The number of people who are
pulling on strings and chasing down
leads and looking at this stuff, she
should be putting every credible tip
that she gets on her platform and then
we go run them down. Okay? Then we go
run them down. Okay? Now, I understand
why she's defending herself because
because like there were like and there's
like people who are like, "Listen, this
gu is not real." and they use it to
attack her with. Okay, but the point
that I'm making is that's not an attack.
It doesn't matter. If you figure out
that he's not real, then you just put it
out and you're like, "Hey, man. We
looked into this guy. He's not real."
And then that's the end. Okay. What
Candace said, like, if you go and look
at what she said online, she said, "This
has turned into this huge thing. I think
it it would be best if Erica and Brian
Harpole just provide alibis so we can
all move on. The only thing that matters
about this case right here is whether or
not Erica and Brian Harpole were
actually at Fort Wuka. And if they
weren't, we're done with it. That's it.
Okay. This is not some like like there's
there's no there's no war here. There's
no conflict here if everybody is
understands what Candace's show actually
is. You think Candace is going to solve
this by herself? She can't. No one can.
Dude, no one can. Okay. Tomorrow me and
Heavy Duty Country are going to take
frag, you know, frag rounds, frag 30,
six frag rounds. We're going to go out
to his ranch and we're going to shoot
them into meat with bone and and other
stuff to see if that theory holds holds
water. How do we know that the story is
that they were frag rounds? Cuz Candace
told us, dude. Okay, do you guys
get it? This is how this works. We're
all on the same team. Everyone is on the
same team. Fighting is not allowed,
dude. Okay, anyone who is anyone who's
like going to other people's social
media and they're lighting them up.
Okay, you like this is this is not a
good use of your time. You're not
helping anything. Okay, this is not a
war between people. There's certainly no
world where I'm at I have no conflict
with anyone. Zero. I love Nate. I love
Candace. Okay, I love Alex Jones. I love
all of these people. I want for all of
us to be collectively moving in the
right direction so we can solve this
thing because clearly the FBI
cannot be relied on to do that. Okay? if
they can't like there's we've never had
an opportunity like this ever. Never in
history has there been an opportunity
for a murder like this, a case this
public. Okay, with the internet, we all
have access to all of the evidence and
collectively we can chase down every
single lead. Okay, now you guys know I
don't think that Mitch is real. I think
that he's lying. I think he's lying
about what he saw. Who cares? That
doesn't mean I that doesn't mean he's
lying. Maybe he's telling the truth.
It's irrelevant. Okay, it doesn't
matter. I'm one person. Okay. So, if I
think he's lying, then I'm going to do
what? I'm gonna go focus on the 30 six
rounds and I'll chase that down. There's
a million of us, dude. There's a million
of us. We don't all need to like whether
he was there, not there, whether he saw
what he saw, any of those things. None
of it matters as long as someone who is
doing the right thing is looking into
it. As long as someone's looking into
it, go and go chase down their alibis,
right? Like if you if you believe that
he was really then you guys take it on,
do your part and go chase down his
alibi. Chase chase down, you know, Brian
Harpool and Erica's alibis. That's your
job then. Okay, we have decided we don't
think he's that credible. So, we're
going to go work on the 30 six, you
know, the frag rounds that Candace told
us about and which is why we know we
need to go test them. Why is everyone
fighting? Here's the other thing. Okay,
if we are fighting, that is the goal of
the actual enemies of this entire thing.
This is the most important thing that I
could possibly communicate to people.
Okay?
So, when Alex Jones says what he says,
him and like look dude,
this is a very simple equation.
Candace is a dragon. Candace never going
to take a backwards step. Never. Never.
Okay? If you come at Candace aggressive,
she is going to fight you. That is what
she's going to do. There is no question
about this. It does not matter. It makes
no difference. You could she literally
she could put on a red hat and go this
red this hat's blue and if someone's
like that hat's not blue and they're
disrespectful. She's going to fight them
to the death that the f that the hat's
blue, right? They're going to be like
that it's red. What is wrong with you?
It's red. And she will literally fight
them to the death. She'll slit their
throat over them saying that it's a you
know saying it's a red hat even if it's
red. She's a killing machine. She's a
dragon. This is what she does. Okay.
Alex Jones. Okay.
He's a steamroller, dude. So, what
happens when a steamroller hits a
dragon? If they go at each other
aggressive, it only escalates and the
two sides are going to fight. Like,
there's no upside in the two of them
fighting at all. Everyone wants the same
thing. And I'm going to prove it to you
right now. As we look at what Alex Jones
is saying about the candidac, I'm going
to show you a few minutes of of, you
know, what Alex is saying because I will
prove the point. His intro verifies all
of us want the same thing. But now he's
out there saying that she's an MI6
agent, dude. Candace is not an MI6
agent. I know he has sources on this.
Whatever. They're not. Whoever his
source is, bad actor, dude. Okay. Bad
actor. She's not an MI6 agent. That's
absurd.
That is absurd. What would What would
her endgame be? Okay. Like, as it's
like, if you show me an agent and you
show me what they're doing, I can back
into what the purpose of what they're
doing would be. What would Candace be
doing? What would the purpose of what
Candace is doing be if she's an MI6
agent? Makes no sense. Okay. Makes no
sense. The reason I've always had her
back is because I have always believed
that she believes what she's doing is
moving in the direction of solving a
case and she's working in good faith.
The end. Okay. That's why I always and
Alex I think the same thing. People have
been it just doesn't even matter. Like
it doesn't matter. I am right about what
this is and if everybody can kind of
accept that then we can get back to
chasing down leads. Chase down the Wuka
thing. All you got ahead do chase it
down.
Like if you guys need help with what the
next step is, the next step is to put
pressure on TPUSA to get legitimate
alibis from Erica Kirk and from Brian
Harpool. I know he shared his his uh you
know for people who are like they
already provided that. Okay. Right. He
provided his flight his flight log, you
know, like that he bought these tickets.
They're saying, "Well, that doesn't
prove that he was actually on the
flights." So, just show them that you
were on the flights, dude. Show them
that you were on the flights or show
them, you know, like I don't know,
figure out a way that like in your hotel
room in the morning in Dallas that
there's security footage of it, you know
what I or whatever. And Erica in their
what they said, you know, and in their
defense, they were like, "Dude, that she
showed a picture from the morning of the
9th, not the 8th." Okay. Well, I even
thought that what the what he was saying
was that she was there on the 9th. So,
if I didn't know that, then I'm sure she
also didn't know and she just sent the
wrong day. So, if she's waking up there
on the 9th, she should probably be able
to easily show where she was on the 8th.
So, just provide it. We're done. It's
over. That's the end of all of it. Or if
you can't, then you know the people who
think that this guy Mitch is credible,
they could continue to chase down
whatever they think comes from this,
right? But like, this is how this needs
to go. This is how the investigation
goes. Candace is not responsible for
every single thing that she puts on her
show being accurate. That's not what she
does. She That's why people who watch
it, they're like, "She's never even
saying anything. She's not even like
she's not even like saying what her her
theory is." That's exactly right. She is
the central point of an open- source
investigation. She is putting on her
platform what the clues are and then we
go chase them down. Okay. She has a tip
line that is getting thousands of tips a
day. Okay. Do you really think that they
could simultaneously vet every single
one of these and then also like chase it
down with the surgical precision that
like other people can if they if this is
the only thing that they're focused on
is like this one clue. She vets the
clues. She puts the clues on her
platform. We go chase down whether or
not these clues hold merit. Okay. and
Nate. Everybody's mad at Nate. Okay,
like look, I I will acknowledge I have
no idea what the exact interaction
between Nate and Candace was. Ian, I
know was was defending Nate. I can tell
you right now, Nate is a good actor,
dude. Okay, Nate's a Green Beret
American hero. And what he was doing is
what he should have been doing. That's
why he said a thousand times, I'm not
attacking Candace. He's saying what he
pulled about Mitch is this. And he
doesn't believe Mitch. It's fine if
everybody still believes Mitch. It
doesn't matter. He just said, "I'm gonna
show you what I have on him, and then
you can choose to believe him or not."
As if there's, you know, if there's,
let's just say 70% of Candace's people
think that Mitch is solid. Fine. So,
what are you guys going to go do? You're
going to go find the next thing that we
would chase down from that, which is an
alibi for Erica and an alibi for Brian
Harple. End of story. If you don't
believe Mitch, then you move on to the
other thing. There's a million things
for everybody to look into. That's what
I'm doing. I'm going to test the 30 Got
six theory tomorrow, okay? with the frag
rounds at heavy duty country's ranch.
Like everybody like this this Fort Wuka
thing splitting everybody. That's on
purpose. Stop attacking Candace. She
didn't say that she believes that this
guy really saw them. She did not say
that. That's not what her role is. Her
role is the open source center of the
entire investigation. Okay.

So well said, Jesse on fire.
Well said. And it's what I've been
saying.
and people are wanting to divide us
because that's what the deep state
wants. They want us fighting each other.
So, of course, so we don't all come
together and start
looking into it. They want us to stop
looking into it. And the way to do it is
to discredit Candace Owens. So then we
go, "Oh, it's all crazy."
That's not how an investigation works.
An invest exactly what he says. You pull
a string, you have a lead, you follow it
to its conclusion, and if it ends up
there's nothing there, then we move on
to the next thing. That's how any good
investigator follows every lead until it
comes to a dead end.
And people trying to say she shouldn't
talk be because it's it's not 100%
accurate or that lead led to a dead end
is exactly what they want. They want us
to fight over each other and stop doing
the investigation. Come see me on tour
January 11th in Wik Ki, February 20th in
Lancing, Michigan. February 21st in
Milwaukee. Go to jimmydor.com for a link
for tickets.
[Music]

***********I****

SHOCKING: THIS WASN’T SUPPOSED TO COME OUT – ERIKA & CHARLIE KIRK UPDATE
January 9, 22026
Hustl



Transcript

[Music]

... removing these people and this noise at
the bottom of the hill while I'm trying
to build. Just give me stronger
shoulders. Give me stronger stronger
hands to keep building cuz that's always
going to be there. That's the enemy and
that's that's that's life.

At first it sounded like grief. Then the
statements started changing. Then the
smear campaigns kicked in. They didn't
just assassinate Charlie Kirk. They made
sure no one ever remembers what he
actually stood for. And at the center of
it all is Erica Kirk, the one person
with the power to demand justice for her
husband's brutal execution. But she
won't. Instead, she's attacking anyone
who questions the cover up and calling
them enemies in all the interviews.

I mean, we're carrying on Charlie's
legacy, and there is so much noise. I
know I've said this many times before
and there will always be noise. Whenever
you are over the target, there will the
enemy I mean we're in enemy occupied
territory. There will always be noise
and there will always be people that
will distract you. If myself or Charlie
spent every single second going down and
and responding to every accusation,
responding to every insult, responding
to every judgment, we would get nothing
done. We just wouldn't. And at the end
of, you know, Nehemiah, he basically was
saying, "Lord, strengthen my hands." And
so, I feel the same way. Like, I'm not
going to ask God to remove those people
from my life. It just makes me stronger.
So, Lord, instead of removing these
people and this noise at the bottom of
the hill while I'm trying to build, just
give me stronger shoulders. Give me
stronger stronger hands to keep building
cuz that's always going to be there.
That's the enemy. And that's that's
that's life. That's life.

In the comment
section of my last video, I noticed
something interesting. A lot of people
agreed with me that Erica's behavior
just wasn't normal. But a surprising
number of people were really aggressive
about one thing. Stop talking about her.
And honestly, that reaction alone made
me want to dig even deeper. Because when
people start demanding silence, that's
usually where the real story begins.

Now, most of you already know about
Erica's family ties to the US military
and her strange past running a
controversial nonprofit in Romania. Kirk
herself is another one. She's been tied
to orphanages in Eastern Europe,
specifically in Romania through a
program called Romanian Angels.

Since she was a teenager, when she was 17
years old, she founded Romanian Angels
as a nonprofit. So, in effect, since
Erica's childhood, she's been running
orphanages in Eastern Europe, a child
trafficking hotbed. Is that normal
activity for a 17-year-old girl to be
involved with?

ERIKA: I've been able to travel to the
Pentagon. I've been able to meet General
Salazar, who's actually out here in
Arizona. And so, there's been a lot of
things that have been going on from
working in the military ...

That alone raised eyebrows. But many of you were
shocked to learn that her exboyfriend
Cabot Phillips, didn't just know
Charlie, he also appears to be
positioning himself as a replacement
figure. And here's where things get even
weirder. Cabot Phillips is so obsessed with
pizza that he literally tattooed the
word on the inside of his lips back in
2019. Now, we all know what that word
means, and I'm sure no sane person would
tattoo it on their body after 2016.
Charlie himself repeatedly warned that
pizza was used as coded language by some
of the most powerful and evil people in
the world.

CABOT: I'm also banned from the United Kingdom,
the entire country, the UK. Um, but that
has nothing to do, we won't clap for
that. That has nothing to do with what
we're talking about. Maybe during the Q&A We'll get to it.
But yeah, good times.

So, I think it becomes pretty clear why
Erica suddenly started lying about her
dating history.

ERIKA: But what I will say is when I lived out
here, I was here for 5 years. I never
dated here cuz I saw vicariously through
my roommate how terrible it was. Somehow
getting drinks was the replacement of
having coffee and breakfast. I
personally would rather have coffee or
brunch with someone than going I just I
don't drink. think I find it
unproductive. Not because I'm holier
than whatever. I just don't
operate that way. But I always thought
it was very strange how she would go to
drinks with one guy and then go to
dinner with another.

Of course, the evidence says she is a
liar because here's Cabot celebrating
with her mother just 9 months before
Erica started dating Charlie.

And speaking of lies and performance,
let's talk about her behavior after
Charlie's death. Because at this point,
I think most people can agree she often
looks like she's acting. One moment
she's crying, the next moment she's
smiling and talking about how Charlie's
company is going to grow now that he's
gone.

Love you, Erica.
Love you, Erica.
What do you hope to achieve for Charlie
and for the country?

ERIKA: Oh my goodness. All of his wildest
dreams for this organization and more.
He left me a blueprint and all of his
journals, but more so than that, I was
his vault for literally everything. He
shared everything with me, his vision,
his dreams, and
I know now more than ever, I mean, he
was always a hard worker, but now more
than ever, he's up in heaven
orchestrating and sitting and
strategizing. And I can just feel it. I
can feel it.

At first, like many of you, I gave her
the benefit of the doubt. Shock and
grief can make people behave in strange
ways. But after her recent interviews
and statements, it's clear this isn't
just shock. She's just built
differently.

ERIKA: Despite the devastating loss of Charlie
Kirk, my incredible husband at UVU,
Caleb has persisted with the same grift,
excuse me, gift, grit.
It has been a long day.
Trust me, you're not a grifter, honey.
It's all good.

ERIKA: We have speeches that no one's
heard of. We have interviews that no
one's heard of. We have stuff from Korea
and Japan that no one's heard of.
So, I mean, in the words of my husband,
buckle up, because there is a lot of
content to be had, and we have so many
amazing things down the pipeline that we
are working on currently that will
unveil in due time.
I am so excited.
Yeah.

NICKI MINAJ: And you have amazing role models like
the assassin, JD Vance, our vice president. And when I
say that ...

ERIKA: Trust me, there's nothing new under
the sun that I have not heard. So,
you're fine.

Now, here's the thing. No one would have
cared about any of this if she hadn't
taken over the single largest youth
political movement in the country. And
that's why people like me are asking one
simple question. Why hasn't she gone
after the government for blatantly
covering up her husband's assassination?
Because we know Charlie was in serious
disagreements with powerful people.

And so he would react. Sometimes people
would just say, "Yeah, don't invite him,
or we're going to, you know, cut off
some large donation." And that would
make him angry. He would say this is moral blackmail. And
he's this Scottish guy. He's
combative. His reaction to that is, you
know, you know the classic "Screw
me? No, screw you," you know, that sort of
thing.

CHARLIE: And we the American people ran on
transparency. We deserve to see the
entire client list. Every document the
government has regarding the Epstein
files we the American people should have
on an easy to access website immediately
in a very very quick fashion. I'm
pushing for that both privately and
publicly just so you know.

And then right before Epstein's files
resurface, right before new wars
escalate, Charlie Kirk is assassinated
in front of the entire world. Almost
like someone was sending a message.

Now, I know there are a lot of wild theories
floating around out there, but in all
that noise, people forgot about the
actual evidence. Why were security
personnel removing items from the crime
scene immediately after the shooting?

xxx

Why did TPUSA producer Andrew Kolvet
claim a surgeon told him a 30 odd six
round somehow didn't exit Charlie's neck,
only for that story to quietly fall
apart later?

CANDACE (READING):

Absolutely. The bullet should have gone
through, which is very normal for a
high-powered, high velocity round. I've
seen wounds from this caliber many
times, and they always just go through
everything. This would have taken a
moose or two down, an elk, etc.

Next up, that quotation continues.

It was an absolute miracle that someone else did
not get killed. His bone was so healthy,
and the density was so so impressive,
that he's like the man of steel. It
should have just gone through and
through. It likely would have killed
those standing behind him, too.

And that seems strange for a lot of reasons.
First off, HIPPA compliance. Why would
he speak to Andrew Kolvet? Also, never
once did Dr. Lee Troder say that
Charlie's neck stopped a 30-6 bullet.
Let's be real. Saying the bullet stopped
because of thick bones is insulting.

They lied. And that lie alone casts a
very dark shadow over this entire case.

But here's what's even more disturbing.
No one ever seriously questioned why
Kash Patel shut down an investigation by
Trump's own counterterrorism chief, an
investigation into possible foreign
intelligence involvement in Charlie's
assassination.

Official’s Access to FBI Files in Charlie Kirk Case Drew Pushback. An inquiry by Joe Kent, who leads the National Counterterrorism Center, is said to have alarmed Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director.
by Julian E. Barnes, Maggie Haberman and Devlin Barrett
The New York Times Company
Oct 28, 2025
https://www.myheraldreview.com/free_acc ... 46b2f.html

The head of the National Counterterrorism Center examined FBI files in the last several weeks to investigate whether the man charged with assassinating Charlie Kirk had support from someone else, a foreign power or another entity, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.

The inquiry by Joe Kent, the director of the counterterrorism center, alarmed Kash Patel, the director of the FBI. Patel and other senior officials believed Kent was overstepping, treading on FBI responsibilities and potentially interfering with the investigation and the prosecution of the suspect, Tyler Robinson.

But supporters of Kent say he was doing his job, running down leads and making sure no foreign or domestic groups were linked to Kirk’s death.

Robinson, 22, is accused of killing Kirk last month as the conservative activist made an appearance at a college campus in Utah. State prosecutors in Utah have charged Robinson with seven counts, including felony aggravated murder.

The Senate confirmed Kent as director of the counterterrorism center in July. He is one of the closest advisers to Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, and shares her focus on traditional terrorism groups as well as drug cartels.

Patel was troubled that Kent had gone through FBI material related to the case, according to the people knowledgeable on the matter.

The FBI and the Justice Department generally keep tight control over evidence in criminal cases, particularly when they are preparing for a trial, in which government documents may have to be turned over to the defense and could be used to poke holes in the prosecution’s case.

While Robinson is currently facing only state charges, some administration officials were concerned that Kent’s efforts could provide fodder to defense lawyers, who could use the notion that more than one person was involved in Kirk’s killing to raise reasonable doubt, said those aware of the matter.

In response to questions from The New York Times, Patel and Gabbard released a joint statement that did not address the debate over Kent’s inquiry and sought to portray a unified front. “The FBI and intelligence community under the direction of President Trump will leave no stone unturned in the investigation of the assassination of our friend, Charlie Kirk,” they said.

But multiple people said tensions over Kent’s work had persisted for some time and were part of a broader set of issues between Gabbard’s office and other administration agencies.

When you look at all of this, one thing becomes clear. At every
step, Erika and her inner circle seem
focused on one thing: Making us forget
what we saw with our very own eyes.
Instead of protests, instead of
demanding justice, they're busy running
political campaigns for JD Vance that
President Trump has Congress for all
four years.

ERIKA: We are going to get my husband's friend
JD Vance elected for 48 in the most
resounding way possible.

ERIKA: And he shared everything with me. I
knew his goals. I knew what his vision
was for things. So, this is not out
of my orbit. This is not uncomfortable
for me. And it's not because I'm
picking up a mantle that I don't understand
and that Charlie has
entrusted to me, the team has entrusted
to me, the Lord has entrusted to me. And
I take that very seriously.

Meanwhile, the country keeps sliding in a very
predictable and dangerous direction.

VANCE: He felt very strongly we need Greenland for national
security, not for minerals. We have so
many sites for minerals and
oil and everything. We have more oil
than any other country in the world.

TRUMP: We
need Greenland for national security.
And if you take a look at Greenland, you
look up and down the coast, you have
Russian and Chinese ships all over the
place. We need it for national security.
We have to have him. And he wanted to
leave the chair. So we're making him
Marco today special envoy to Greenland.
But we can't take a chance after having
done this incredible thing last night of letting
somebody else take over, where we have to
do it again. We can do it again too.
Nobody can stop us. There's nobody that
has the capability that we have. You
know, when I watch that war in Russia
going on and on and on and everybody
dying and it's like primitive. It's
primitive. It's horrible.

I mean, didn't we vote against people
like Lindsay Graham?

You know, one of the things that is
happening, and I think you see it, you
see it all the time, Howard. You've seen
it, that Cuba is ready to fall. You
know, Cuba looks like it's ready to fall. I
don't know how they if they're going to
hold out. But Cuba now has no income.
They got all of their income from
the Venezuelan oil.
They're not getting any of it.
And Cuba literally is ready to fall. And
you have a lot of great Cubanas that
are going to be very happy about this.

So, when TPUSA says 2025 was a year of
"immense loss and profound revival,"
I don't know what reality they're living
in, because from where I'm standing,
everything's been getting worse. Ever
since a young father was executed for
saying the wrong thing.

[admin]

Educators Union Sues Texas After Teachers Investigated, Disciplined Over Charlie Kirk Comments
by Ryan J. Farrick
Legalreader.com
January 6, 2026
https://www.legalreader.com/educators-t ... t-lawsuit/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VZVZ8I7ueQ01I0dgSYJtEWUxo_uLX-gx/view

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION

TEXAS AMERICAN FEDERATION
OF TEACHERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY and MIKE MORATH, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Education Agency,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:26-cv-00024

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

“[T]he TEA appears to mandate investigations only for school personnel voicing criticism of the Commissioner’s preferred political figure,” the lawsuit alleges.

The American Federation of Teachers has filed a federal lawsuit against the Texas Education Agency, claiming that dozens of public school employees lost their jobs for sharing unfavorable opinions of Charlie Kirk on social media.

According to The New York Times, the lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Texas branch of the American Federation of Teachers, a union that represents educators throughout the country.

“A few well-placed Texas politicians and bureaucrats think it is good for their careers to trample on educators’ free speech rights,” said Zeph Capo, the president of the union’s Texas chapter. “Meanwhile, educators and their families are afraid that they’ll lose everything: their livelihoods, their reputations, and their very purpose for being, which is to impart critical thinking.”

In court filings, attorneys for the union claim that the Texas Education Agency violated teachers’ First Amendment right to free speech by directing state and local officials to aggressively investigate comments about Kirk. The lawsuit notes that most of these comments were made on private social media accounts that would not have been accessible to students or members of the general public. Some teachers were disciplined or terminated as a result.

“This was a state-sponsored attack on teachers because of what they expressed privately to their friends and colleagues and family,” said American Federation of Teachers national president Randi Weingarten.

“You can’t have First Amendment rights for some and not for all,” Weingarten told the New York Times in an interview. Weingarten emphasized that, even if some of the comments about Kirk could be considered “noxious,” people “have this fundamental right to express themselves.”

[x]
Charlie Kirk in 2022. Kirk, a right-wing activist and podcaster, was assassinated at a Turning Point USA event in September 2025. Image via Flickr/user:Gage Skidmore. (CCA-BY-2.0). Source:https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/38696382190).

The lawsuit names defendants including the state education agency and its commissioner, Mike Morath. The Times notes that, in a letter sent to superintendents shortly after Kirk’s death, Morath claimed agency officials had seen “reprehensible” and “vile” postings by a number of public school teachers. In his letter, Morath instructed superintendents to report all “inappropriate” content pertaining to Kirk’s murder.

“While all educators are held to a high standard of professionalism, there is a difference between comments made in poor taste and those that call for and incite further violence—the latter of which is clearly unacceptable,” Morath said in a September statement.

Morath also said that, while some school districts have since made the decision to terminate teachers for criticizing Kirk, the Texas Education Agency itself has not ordered the firing of any individual teacher or teachers.

“Some of those complaints are clearly people that are personally settling scores with others they don’t like, and those cases will just get closed,” Morath said of the investigations. The ones that we’re going after, from an enforcement perspective, are very clearly violations of the educator code of conduct.”

Attorneys for the American Federation of Teachers were quick to observe that the crackdown on Charlie Kirk-related comments appears to be politically motivated.

The Texas Education Agency, the lawsuit emphasizes, did not issue any similar guidance or rules after the murders of Democratic Minnesota lawmakers Melissa Hortman or John Hoffman.

“Instead, the TEA appears to mandate investigations only for school personnel voicing criticism of the Commissioner’s preferred political figure,” the lawsuit alleges.

Sources

350 Texas teachers targeted for posts about Charlie Kirk, lawsuit says

A union is suing Texas’ education agency for investigating teachers over posts about Charlie Kirk

Texas Is Sued Over Investigations Into Teachers’ Speech After Charlie Kirk’s Death

Texas teachers union sues state education agency for investigating social media posts about Charlie Kirk

******************

Top union accuses Texas of targeting teachers over Charlie Kirk posts. American Federation of Teachers sues over what it says are unconstitutional investigations into social media comments
by Joseph Gedeon in Washington
The Guardian
Tue 6 Jan 2026 15.54 EST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... cial-media

[x]
Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk speaks during a campaign rally in October 2024. Photograph: John Locher/AP

A major Texas teachers’ union filed a federal lawsuit against the state on Tuesday challenging what it describes as unconstitutional investigations into hundreds of educators who posted comments on social media following the September killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

The Texas American Federation of Teachers, which represents approximately 66,000 public school employees, is asking a federal court to block the Texas Education Agency and its commissioner, Mike Morath, from continuing investigations that the union argues violate teachers’ free speech protections.

The legal challenge centers on a 6 September letter Morath sent to school superintendents across Texas, instructing them to report educators who made what he termed “reprehensible and inappropriate” remarks about Kirk, who was shot and killed on 10 September while speaking at Utah Valley University. The union argues this directive has triggered a sweeping crackdown on constitutionally protected speech.

“Public school teachers and other employees do not surrender their first amendment rights simply by virtue of their employment,” the lawsuit reads.

The lawsuit describes cases of four teachers who faced discipline ranging from termination to formal investigations after making personal social media posts criticizing Kirk’s rightwing positions on issues including race and immigration. According to the complaint, educators were punished despite posting from personal accounts, outside work hours, and without causing any disruption to school operations.

The Texas Education Agency has received more than 350 complaints about educators’ social media activity related to Kirk’s death, according to the Texas Tribune. As of Sunday, the agency told the Tribune that 95 complaints remained under investigation, with hundreds dismissed or found unsubstantiated.

“Simply being under investigation negatively impacts an educator’s reputation, requires resource expenditures for legal representation, and can have lasting detrimental impacts on an employee’s long-term employment prospects, even outside of the education arena,” the lawsuit adds.

The lawsuit does not seek monetary damages but asks the court to call the investigation policy unconstitutional, stop all related probes, and require Morath to issue new, corrective guidance clarifying that districts don’t need to report comments made by the educators.

The Texas Education Agency declined to respond to a request for comment.

[admin]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION

TEXAS AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY and MIKE MORATH, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Education Agency,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:26-cv-00024

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Texas American Federation of Teachers (“Texas AFT”), on behalf of its membership, brings this action against Defendants Texas Education Agency (the “TEA”) and Commissioner Mike Morath in his official capacity (“Mr. Morath”; together, “Defendants”) and requests relief from this Court based on the following:

I. INTRODUCTION

1. Texas AFT is a labor union dedicated to promoting the rights and advancing the interests of its members, all of whom are focused on the critical, all-important goal of educating the children of Texas. Its membership is composed of approximately 66,000 public school teachers and other employees—including teachers’ aides, custodians, bus drivers, and cafeteria workers—in districts throughout Texas.

2. Texas AFT works both through union locals and on a statewide level, as well as through its national affiliate, the American Federation of Teachers, to secure better public school funding, improve employee benefits, and ensure safer schools for its members and their students, reflecting its members’ commitment to creating a stable, quality learning environment for students. Texas AFT also provides professional development and other services that enhance both its members’ and students’ school and classroom experiences, as well as enriching its members’ professional lives overall. Texas AFT’s priorities reflect the interests of its members, and it prioritizes protecting its members from patently unfair policies or infringement of their legal rights.

3. Although public school teachers and other employees are public servants, they do not surrender their First Amendment rights simply by virtue of their employment, especially with respect to their activities as private citizens outside of the school environment. More specifically, the First Amendment rights granted to all American citizens, including public school teachers and other employees, protect their ability to comment on current events through their personal accounts on social media platforms, which are outside of their school roles and their official school duties. Unfortunately, recent actions taken by the TEA through Mr. Morath have violated these fundamental rights and chilled the protected speech of public school teachers and other Texas AFT members.

4. On September 12, 2025, in the wake of the shooting death of public figure Charlie Kirk, Mr. Morath sent a Policy Letter to all superintendents in the state targeting allegedly “reprehensible and inappropriate content on social media” posted by “some” Texas public school educators, without specifically naming any of those “educators” or identifying the allegedly inappropriate content. Exhibit 1, TEA Policy from Mr. Morath, dated September 12, 2025 (the “TEA Policy”) (emphasis added). After recognizing that “the exercise of free speech is a fundamental right we are all blessed to share,” Mr. Morath immediately contradicted himself and stated his intention to violate that right, explaining that he would refer any educators whose Kirk-related posts he personally considered “vile” to the TEA’s Educator Investigations Division. Mr. Morath mandated superintendents across Texas do the same, directing as follows:

If you are made aware of additional instances of inappropriate conduct being shared, it should be reported to the agency through TEA’s Misconduct Reporting Panel.

Id. The TEA Policy fails to identify or define “inappropriate conduct,” or provide any other guidelines or protections to ensure that the due process and free speech rights of educators are preserved and protected. Texas AFT members are subject to the TEA Policy.

5. The TEA Policy disseminated by Mr. Morath quickly unleashed a wave of retaliation and disciplinary actions against teachers based on their First Amendment protected speech. Some superintendents echoed the TEA Policy, emailing their teachers and employees about the policy and stating that teachers who violated it would be investigated.

6. As a result, Texas AFT members have been placed on administrative leave, reprimanded, and even in some cases terminated for expressing their views about Mr. Kirk and other matters of public concern in social media posts made on their own time and using their own resources. These teachers were disciplined solely for their speech, without any regard to whether the posts disrupted school operations in any way. In many cases, Texas AFT members made their posts on online profiles or pages that are “private,” and can be viewed only by individuals who have been specifically approved by the account owner.

7. Critically, consistent with TEA’s mandate contained in the TEA Policy, Texas AFT members have been referred to the TEA for investigation based on their social media posts. These investigations into allegations of misconduct are performed by TEA staff and can result in sanction or revocation of an educator’s teaching certificate—or put another way, the destruction of a career in education.

8. Further, as a result of the TEA Policy and Mr. Morath’s actions, educators and other employees have come under immediate, vicious attack and doxxing, often by outsiders who do not live in the educator’s district or have children at the educator’s school, and in some cases are not even residents of Texas.

9. One popular high school English teacher, Teacher 1, was fired after a politician used her posts—which simply raised questions about the circumstances of Mr. Kirk’s death and did not promote violence in any way—as the centerpiece of his election campaign, encouraging his supporters to call for Teacher 1’s dismissal. Tellingly, only two members of the school board voted for Teacher 1’s termination; the remaining five present members abstained in protest.

10. As a result of the TEA Policy, and based on information and belief, over 350 public school teachers and other public school employees have been reported to and/or are under investigation by the TEA. Simply being under investigation negatively impacts an educator’s reputation, requires resource expenditures for legal representation, and can have lasting detrimental impacts on an employee’s long-term employment prospects, even outside of the education arena.

11. Texas AFT denounces violence in every form, whether it is children killed in mass school shootings or a public figure like Charlie Kirk being shot and killed. Free speech under the First Amendment, however, is a fundamental right in a democratic society, and nonviolent speech, even when others strongly disagree with it, is protected.

12. The TEA Policy violates the First Amendment rights of Texas AFT members because it is impermissibly vague, overbroad, and chills their protected speech. Texas AFT thus brings this action to prevent and enjoin further infringement of these dedicated public servants’ protected rights.

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

13. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 because this action is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and seeks to vindicate civil rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

14. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they are residents of Texas, have their principal places of business in Texas, and the acts giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims have occurred in, and continue to occur in, this judicial district.

III. PARTIES

15. Texas AFT is a labor union representing over 66,000 teachers and nonadministrative public school employees across the state. In addition to employees of K-12 schools, Texas AFT also represents employees of higher education institutions and retired teachers. Texas AFT is organized in accordance with the laws of the state of Texas. As required of labor organizations representing public employees in Texas, Texas AFT does not claim the right to strike. As a labor union, Texas AFT is committed to enforcing and protecting the employment rights of its members, who work hard to provide an education to the schoolchildren who attend Texas schools. Further, among the purposes of Texas AFT is the improvement of public education in Texas, which is tied inextricably to the improvement of the working conditions and professional standing of teachers and other public school employees. Thousands of Texas AFT members are aggrieved by the actions of the defendants, and Texas AFT brings this action on their behalf. Texas AFT’s primary business address is 1106 Lavaca Street, Suite 100A, Austin, Texas, 78701. Texas AFT members are subject to the TEA Policy described above. As a central part of its mission, Texas AFT advocates for and protects the legal rights of its members. Texas AFT appears through its undersigned counsel.

16. Defendant Texas Education Agency (“TEA”) is the state agency that oversees primary and secondary public education in Texas. The TEA’s Educator Investigations Division is responsible for investigating reports of misconduct by educators, school staff, and service providers on behalf of the State Board for Educator Certification. The TEA’s primary business address is 1701 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas, 78701. It can be served at this location. Texas AFT seeks only declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendant TEA. Texas AFT does not seek monetary damages from Defendant TEA.

17. Defendant Mike Morath is the Commissioner of the Texas Education Agency and is sued in his official capacity. His primary business address is 1701 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas, 78701. He can be served at this location. Texas AFT seeks only declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendant Morath. Texas AFT does not seek monetary damages from Defendant Morath.

IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The First Amendment Protects the Free Speech of All Americans

18. The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech for all Americans, protecting their ability to express opinions and engage in public conversation without fear of government retaliation. These fundamental rights belong to everyone—including educators—and are not surrendered because of one’s employment. Public school teachers, like all citizens, retain their constitutional protections when speaking in a personal capacity, including on their personal social media accounts. When they express themselves as private individuals, they are engaging in the same protected activity afforded to every member of the public, even if their views may be disfavored by government actors.

The Death of Charlie Kirk

19. Tragically, on September 10, 2025, political commentator Charlie Kirk was shot and killed while addressing an audience at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.

20. Traditional media outlets and social media platforms erupted with news of the event and reactions to it, including highly charged discussions concerning political violence and the life and work of Mr. Kirk. Some of that discussion focused on the controversial statements he made throughout his life, which created large groups of both supporters and detractors across the political spectrum. Although Mr. Kirk described himself as a passionate proponent of First Amendment rights, individuals who, after Mr. Kirk’s death, publicly expressed their belief that some of his statements were offensive were met with online harassment and hostility. This backlash extended to public school educators who, on their own time, posted about the event on their personal social media accounts, and who suffered professional consequences as a result.

Mr. Morath and the TEA

21. Mr. Morath, as Texas’s Commissioner of Education, is “the educational leader of the state.” Tex. Educ. Code § 7.055(b)(1). He is the “executive officer” of TEA. Id. at § 7.055(b)(2). State law gives Mr. Morath the authority to “delegate ministerial and executive functions to agency staff and may employ division heads and any other employees and clerks to perform the duties of the agency.” Id. at § 7.055(b)(5). TEA’s multiple divisions report to Mr. Morath in his role as Commissioner of Education. See TEA’s December 1, 2024, Agency Organizational Chart, available at https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/tea-age ... -chart.pdf (last visited Nov. 27, 2025) (“TEA Organizational Chart”).

22. One of these divisions is Educator Investigations, which conducts investigations of teachers reported for misconduct. Educator Investigations is within TEA’s “Office of Governance,” which itself reports directly to Mr. Morath. See TEA Organizational Chart. Based on TEA’s investigation, and after a contested case, the State Board of Educator Certification (“SBEC”) may take disciplinary action against TEA certificate holders as specified by 19 TAC 249.14(a), including reprimanding, suspending, or revoking (permanently or for a period of time) an educator’s certificate. 19 Tex. Admin. Code § 249.15(a) & (c).

The TEA Policy

23. In a clear reaction to online views critical of Mr. Kirk, on September 12, 2025, Mr. Morath sent a letter (again, the “TEA Policy”) to all Texas public school district superintendents requiring that school districts report employees making certain First Amendment-protected statements for investigation. The TEA Policy stated, in relevant part:

TEA has been made aware of some Texas public school educators that have posted and/or shared reprehensible and inappropriate content on social media related to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. . . . In response to such posts, I am referring all documentation of educators that have proliferated [sic] such vile content to TEA’s Educator Investigations Division. Such posts could constitute a violation of the Educators’ Code of Ethics. . . . If you are made aware of additional instances of inappropriate content being shared, it should be reported to the agency through TEA’s Misconduct Reporting Portal.

Exhibit 1.

24. The TEA Policy thereby directed school district superintendents across the state to report employees who engaged in protected speech regarding Mr. Kirk for TEA misconduct investigations. Further, the TEA Policy unleashed an intense backlash against teachers across the state. On information and belief, in a meeting held shortly after the policy was published, Mr. Morath threatened disciplinary action against principals and superintendents who failed to comply with the TEA Policy.

25. After Mr. Morath’s call for retaliation against teachers who shared “inappropriate content” about Mr. Kirk, Texas school districts referred Texas AFT members to TEA for investigation and began to discipline them for social media posts regarding Mr. Kirk’s death made on both public accounts and private accounts, where viewers must be specifically approved by the account owners.

26. Based on public reporting, more than 350 teachers have been reported for investigation, and are pending investigation by TEA as a result of the TEA Policy’s directive.

27. The following are examples of the harms suffered by Texas AFT members who were directly and adversely affected by the unconstitutional policy pushed by the TEA:

Teacher 1

28. Teacher 1 is a member of Texas AFT, and until recently served as a high school English teacher in an independent school district near Houston. Teacher 1 has served as a teacher for twenty-seven years.

29. On the day of Mr. Kirk’s death, Teacher 1 posted questions on her public Facebook page prompting a debate about the assassination of Mr. Kirk and her viewpoint that karma played a role in his death.

30. The following morning, Teacher 1’s school administration placed her on administrative leave. At no point did Teacher 1’s post result in any disruption to school operations.

31. The following week, after the TEA Policy was published, a human resources representative told Teacher 1 that the school district planned to refer her to the TEA for an ethics violation.

32. Shortly thereafter, at its monthly board meeting, the local school board opened the floor for public comments on whether to fire Teacher 1 for her statements about Mr. Kirk. Community members offered comments on whether Teacher 1 should be terminated. After more than two hours of closed session, the school board terminated Teacher 1 for her statements, but without a majority of school board members supporting her termination. Of the seven members of the board, five abstained from the vote and two voted in favor of the motion to fire Teacher 1. After weeks of unemployment, Teacher 1 settled her claim for wrongful termination with the school district.

Teacher 2

33. Teacher 2 is a member of Texas AFT. He is a high school social studies teacher in an independent school district in the San Antonio area. Teacher 2 has been a teacher for sixteen years. Teacher 2 is a U.S. Army veteran and a celebrated educator who previously received the “Teacher of the Year” award in his school district.

34. After Mr. Kirk’s death, Teacher 2 made multiple posts on his private Facebook page criticizing Mr. Kirk for his statements against Black Americans and noting the public’s lack of outrage for other acts of violence. No administrators, students, or teachers from Teacher 2’s school were “friends” on his Facebook account.

35. Teacher 2 deleted his Facebook posts after the TEA Policy was published for fear of punishment from the TEA.

36. Despite removing the posts, Teacher 2’s principal contacted him to let him know the principal had received a report regarding the Facebook posts. The principal told Teacher 2 that the principal did not think Teacher 2 had done anything wrong, but wanted Teacher 2 to be aware of the complaint.

37. Later that week, Teacher 2 was directed to report to the Human Resources Department of his district to discuss his posts. Teacher 2 was accompanied by his local AFT Chapter President. During this meeting, the Employee Relations personnel referenced Mr. Morath’s letter and stated the meeting was required to comply with the TEA Policy.

38. As directed by the TEA Policy, the school district then referred Teacher 2 to the TEA for disciplinary investigation.

39. As of the date of this filing, Teacher 2’s posts have not resulted in any disruption to school operations. He is still teaching in his classroom, awaiting his fate from the TEA.

Teacher 3

40. Teacher 3 is a member of Texas AFT. She is also a high school ESL teacher in an independent school district near San Antonio. This year marks her second year of teaching.

41. Shortly after Mr. Kirk’s death, Teacher 3 commented on a viral TikTok post from her public account, criticizing Mr. Kirk’s stance on immigration.

42. An X (formerly Twitter) user posted screenshots of Teacher 3’s comment, along with Teacher 3’s TikTok profile, a photo of Teacher 3, a screenshot of Teacher 3’s school directory, and Teacher 3’s LinkedIn page, calling for her to lose her job. On information and belief, the X user is not a parent or community member of Teacher 3’s school district.

43. The next day, Teacher 3’s principal informed her that human resources wanted to speak with her. The principal said that she did not think this was “right,” but it was necessary that Teacher 3 meet with human resources.

44. During the meeting with human resources, a human resources representative asked Teacher 3 to explain her post about Mr. Kirk and other reposts to her social media quoting Martin Luther King, Jr., and James Baldwin. Teacher 3 was also told that her posts violated the school social media policy and that as required by TEA, the school district would report her to TEA for investigation.

45. As of the date of this filing, Teacher 3’s posts have not resulted in any disruption to school operations. Indeed, she has been teaching students while she awaits the outcome of TEA’s investigation.

Teacher 4

46. Teacher 4 is a member of Texas AFT. She is a second-grade teacher in an independent school district near San Antonio.

47. Teacher 4 posted several comments on social media criticizing the amount of public mourning for Mr. Kirk’s death compared to the public mourning of children killed in school shootings. Teacher 4 also criticized Mr. Kirk’s controversial statements about people of color, immigrants, and women. Teacher 4 later deleted these posts after she heard a rumor that Mr. Morath was planning to issue a policy regarding social media use and Mr. Kirk.

48. On September 13, 2025, Teacher 4’s principal received a phone call from a senior executive from the school district, notifying him that Teacher 4 had made several social media posts regarding the assassination of Mr. Kirk and that she was under investigation.

49. On September 15, 2025, the principal spoke with Teacher 4 about the posts and referenced the TEA Policy. During this conversation, Teacher 4 told the principal that she had deleted the posts.

50. On September 30, 2025, the principal issued Teacher 4 a written reprimand titled “Memorandum of Expectation” stating that the school district human resources “determined [she] violated the following Board policies: Standard 1.7. The educator shall comply with state regulations, written school board policies, and other state and federal laws.” Id. The letter further stated: “Beginning immediately, you are to comply with the following administrative directives: As an employee, you are expected to conduct yourself in a professional and ethical manner. This is to include inappropriate postings on social media as you are representing yourself as an educator of the District.” Id.

51. The reprimand warned Teacher 4 that “failure to follows these directives may result in further disciplinary action, including and up to termination” and that this “documentation may also be considered cumulative data for any future incidents.” Id. The principal’s use of the phrase “cumulative data,” found in 19 Tex. Admin. Code § 150.1003, indicates the principal may factor this incident in Teacher 4’s annual appraisal.

52. Following these interactions with human resources, Teacher 4 removed all political posts from her social media, fearful of further reprisal.

53. As of the date of this filing, Teacher 4 remains teaching in her classroom and her posts regarding Mr. Kirk have not resulted in any disruption to school operations.

V. CAUSES OF ACTION
Count I: 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Violation of Free Speech Under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution—Facial Challenge

54. Plaintiff realleges all paragraphs above.

55. Defendants are state actors operating under color of state law.

56. Citizens have a vital interest in free and open discussion on issues of public interest and importance. The TEA Policy violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.

i. Impermissible Restriction on Public Employee Speech

57. The First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution prohibit state policies that infringe on public employees’ speech when employees speak as private citizens on matters of public concern. If a policy arguably infringes on these rights, the state actor must establish that its interest in an effective and efficient workplace outweighs those rights.

58. The TEA Policy, on its face, violates the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of Texas AFT members. The Policy does not ask superintendents to assess such posts’ impact on the school environment before requiring them to launch an investigation. Instead, it includes a blanket mandate that schools report school employees for disciplinary investigations and it threatens adverse actions against all Texas public school personnel who, as private citizens, express viewpoints on their personal social media pages that the TEA deems “inappropriate” with respect to a matter of public concern—the assassination of a public figure.

59. Moreover, the TEA Policy is an unconstitutional viewpoint-based restriction on speech, specifically targeting expressions with which the TEA Commissioner disagrees. For example, the TEA did not issue similar letters with respect to teachers or other school personnel who posted about the assassinations of Democratic Minnesota lawmakers Melissa Hortman or John Hoffman in July 2025. Instead, the TEA appears to mandate investigations only for school personnel voicing criticism of the Commissioner’s preferred political figure. Indeed, Mr. Morath is well familiar with teachers’ First Amendment rights; in 2019, he acknowledged and affirmed those rights when he overturned the termination of a teacher on First Amendment grounds. That teacher had been fired for her Twitter post, directed at President Trump’s Twitter account, requesting the removal of “illegal students” from the school district.

ii. Overbreadth

60. The First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution prohibit state policies that are overbroad such that they punish a substantial amount of protected speech in the course of regulating unprotected speech.

61. The TEA Policy mandates that superintendents report any “additional instances of inappropriate content” shared by their teachers and other school personnel on social media about Mr. Kirk’s death to the TEA’s Educator Investigations Division. While this Policy may appropriately restrict some speech that could conceivably create a substantial disruption to the learning environment, it is overbroad because it also targets a wide swath of constitutionally protected speech that has no impact on school operations in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Further, the policy fails to define or describe what is meant by “inappropriate content.”

62. This overbreadth unconstitutionally chills teachers and other school personnel from engaging in protected expressive activity. As a result of the TEA policy, numerous members of Texas AFT deleted their social media posts of a political nature. Members remain fearful about sharing their opinions on matters of public concern––whether online or in person––if their viewpoints do not seemingly align with the Texas State government.

iii. Vagueness

63. The First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution also prohibit state policies that are so impermissibly vague that an ordinary person would not understand what conduct the policy prohibited or that are so standardless as to invite arbitrary enforcement.

64. The TEA Policy’s language mandating that superintendents report “additional instances of inappropriate content” shared by their teachers or other school personnel about Mr. Kirk’s death is so vague and open to varying interpretations that it has invited arbitrary and inconsistent enforcement, with some teachers and other school personnel who are referred for investigation and some who are not. For similar posts, some teachers have received warnings while others were terminated. The TEA Policy thereby fails to provide Texas AFT’s members with adequate notice of their rights and obligations in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

65. This vagueness unconstitutionally chills teachers and other school personnel from engaging in protected expressive activity. As a result of the TEA policy, numerous members of Texas AFT deleted their social media posts of a political nature. Members remain fearful about sharing their opinions on matters of public concern––whether online or in person––if their viewpoints do not seemingly align with the Texas State government.

Count II: 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Violation of Free Speech Under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution—As Applied Challenge

66. Plaintiff realleges all paragraphs above.

67. Defendants are state actors operating under color of state law.

68. The First and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit government employers from taking adverse action against their employees for protected speech. The Constitution protects public employees’ right to speak freely about matters of public concern unless the government can demonstrate that the employer’s interest in an effective and efficient workplace outweighs the employee’s First Amendment rights.

69. Texas AFT members engaged in constitutionally-protected speech when they spoke as private citizens on their personal social media pages on a matter of public concern—the assassination of a public figure who sought a public forum to engage in what he consistently stated was protected First Amendment speech. Plaintiff’s members’ speech, which was also protected, did not create any known disruption to their places of employment or impede their employers’ ability to maintain an efficient and effective workplace—at least until the TEA Policy went into effect.

70. Additionally, Plaintiff’s members’ speech did not sow, encourage, or incite violence in any way.

71. At the direction of the TEA, Plaintiff’s members were subject to adverse actions for their protected speech. As a result of expressing viewpoints the TEA deemed in vague terms “reprehensible and inappropriate,” Texas AFT members have been referred for investigations that may result in sanction or revocation of their certifications, issued verbal and written reprimands, placed on administrative leave, threatened with future termination if they continued to engage in protected speech, and at least one member was terminated.

72. Members also deleted their posts and closed their social media accounts for fear of being disciplined, demonstrating the true chilling effect the TEA Policy has had on the constitutionally protected speech of Texas AFT members.

73. The TEA and Mr. Morath’s publication of the Policy also pressured superintendents and principals to report teachers and other school personnel who had posted about Mr. Kirk’s death, which similarly chilled the constitutionally protected speech of Texas AFT members.

74. The TEA Policy violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution as applied to Plaintiff because Defendants have denied AFT members’ right to speak, discriminated against their viewpoints and expression of their viewpoints, and retaliated against them for the exercise of their right to speak about their viewpoints on a matter of public concern.

Irreparable Harm

75. As a result of the unconstitutional TEA Policy, Texas AFT’s members have already suffered irreparable harm, including disciplinary actions taken against them, being referred for and subjected to investigations by TEA, and receiving permanent black marks on their employment records for their purely private viewpoint expression. There is no adequate remedy at law for the violation of the constitutional rights of Texas AFT and its members. Unless the requested injunctive relief is granted, Texas AFT members will continue to suffer irreparable harm.

76. The TEA Policy has a chilling effect on the exercise of Texas AFT members’ constitutional rights. The TEA Policy thereby causes Texas AFT members irreparable injury each day it is in effect.

VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against Defendants and issue the following forms of relief:

a. A permanent injunction1 enjoining Defendants from enforcing the TEA Policy in any manner; compelling Defendants to retract the Policy; compelling Defendants to terminate all investigations referred to TEA following the Policy’s publication related to posts regarding Charlie Kirk; and compelling Defendants to issue a new letter advising superintendents that the TEA does not require reports to the Misconduct Reporting Portal regarding the conduct targeted in the TEA Policy;

b. A declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) holding that the TEA Policy is unconstitutional, void, and of no effect;

c. An award of Plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and

d. Any such other or further relief as is necessary, proper, and just under the circumstances.

_____

Notes:

1 Plaintiff will file a separate motion for a preliminary injunction and requesting a preliminary injunction hearing.  

DATED: January 6, 2026

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Karima Maloney
Karima Maloney
Texas Bar No. 24041383
Allison Standish Miller
Texas Bar No. 24046440
Alexander M. Wolf
Texas Bar No. 24095027
STEPTOE LLP
717 Texas Avenue, Suite 2800
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone: (713) 221-2300
Fax: (713) 221-2320
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Ida Adibi (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Kylie Clouse (pro hac vice forthcoming)
STEPTOE LLP
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 429-3000
Fax: (202) 429-3902
[email protected]
[email protected]

Manuel Quinto-Pozos
Texas Bar No. 24070459
DEATS DURST & OWEN PLLC
2901 Bee Cave Road, Suite L
Austin, TX 78746
Telephone: (512) 474-6200
Fax: (512) 474-7896
[email protected]

Counsel for Plaintiff Texas American
Federation of Teachers

***

EXHIBIT 1

TEA
Texas Education Agency
 
Dear Superintendents

TEA has been made aware of some Texas public school educators that have posted and/or shared reprehensible and inappropriate content on social media related to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. These educators’ comments do not reflect the vast majority of Texas teachers who are dedicated practitioners that work diligently to serve more than 5.5 million impressionable young minds in our classrooms.
 
In response to posts, I am referring all documentation of educators that have proliferated such vile content to TEA’s Educator Investigations Division. Such posts could constitute a violation of the Educators’ Code of Ethics, and each instance will be thoroughly reviewed to determine whether sanctionable conduct has occurred and staff will investigate accordingly.
 
While the exercise of free speech is a fundamental right we are all blessed to share, it does not give carte blanche authority to celebrate or sow violence against those that share differing beliefs and perspectives. Mr. Kirk was a father and a husband, and tragically, his children no longer have their father, and his wife no longer has her spouse. As a father and husband myself, and as someone devoted to the education of children, it is heartbreaking.
 
If you are made aware of additional instances of inappropriate content being shared, it should be reported to the agency through TEA’s Misconduct Reporting Portal.
 
I commend the swift action taken by the leadership of the districts that employ these educators. Respect is a core tenet of what we teach and reinforce to our students, and together, we can ensure that such values continue to be reflected in our Texas public schools.
 
In service,
 
Mike Morath
Commissioner of Education
The State of Texas

[admin]

Knesset Member Decries ‘New Enemy’: Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens
By JTA
Washington Jewish Week
January 8, 20264
https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/kn ... ace-owens/

https://x.com/RealCandaceO
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO
Jan 8

The Likud party in Israel just named me and Tucker Carlson as enemies that must be fought.

These people are murderers. Murderers are threatening me and Tucker Carlson over speech. How is this at all acceptable to our government?

[x]
Knesset member Dan Illouz speaks before the Knesset on Jan. 5, 2025.

Grace Gilson

In an address to the Knesset on Monday, Likud lawmaker Dan Illouz decried what he said was a “new enemy” rising within American politics: Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens.

“We are used to enemies from outside. We fight terror tunnels of Hamas. We fight the ballistic missiles of Iran. But today I look at the West, our greatest ally, and I see a new enemy rising from within,” said Illouz, who is originally from Canada, in an English address. “I am speaking of a poison being sold to the American people as patriotism. I’m speaking of the intellectual vandalism of Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens.”

Illouz’s comments come as the Republican party has been roiled in recent months by debates over the mainstreaming of antisemitic influencers within the GOP.

In October, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson hosted far-right antisemitic influencer Nick Fuentes on his platform, igniting outrage from Jewish conservatives who warned of the growing reach of antisemitic voices.

Owens has long made antisemitic rhetoric a hallmark of her YouTube channel, which has 5.7 million subscribers. A recent analysis of her content by the Jewish People Policy Institute found that three-quarters of her videos that mentioned Jews were antisemitic.

“They claim to fight the woke left. They are no different than the woke left,” said Illouz. “The radical left tears down the statues of Thomas Jefferson, Tucker Carlson tears down the legacy of Winston Churchill. The radical left says Western civilization is evil, Candace Owens says the roots of our faith are demonic. It is the same sickness.”

[Narrator] Like David's Jerusalem, Solomon's capital was an insignificant village.

[Israel Finkelstein] There's no evidence for a great Solomonic capital, ruling over a great state, rich state and so on. And here at Megiddo, the buildings, the monumental buildings which had been described as the symbol of Solomonic greatness, in fact date a bit later. They don't date to the time of Solomon. They don't date to the 10th century. So we are in a situation of complete negative picture, negative evidence from coast to coast.

-- THE BIBLE UNEARTHED: THE MAKING OF A RELIGION -- ILLUSTRATED SCREENPLAY & SCREENCAP GALLERY, directed by Thierry Ragobert, © 2005 Europe Images

St. Paul writes, "Man is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or have any authority over a man; she must be silent. If there is anything a woman desires to know, let her ask her husband at home. For Adam was formed first, and then Eve. And it was not the man who was deceived, it was the woman who was deceived and became the sinner."...

Revelation tells us that only 144,000 people will be saved and go to heaven and that none of them will have, quote, "defiled themselves with women." Which I guess excludes most heterosexual men from heaven and, depending on how you interpret that word "defiled," I would say excludes all women, too.

-- LETTING GO OF GOD, by Julia Sweeney © 2006 Julia Sweeney

Carlson and Owens are among the right-wing influencers who have made opposition to Israel a centerpiece of their output, at a time when support for Israel is declining among conservatives, particularly younger conservatives.

In November, Amichai Chikli, the Israeli Diaspora minister, echoed Illouz’s concerns in an interview with the New York Post, telling the outlet that he was “far more concerned about antisemitism on the right than on the left.” The comments were notable because Chikli is himself a right-wing, anti-“woke” warrior who, in a first for Israel, has stoked relationships with far-right European parties that in some cases have ties to the Nazis.

“One of the worst moments was when a popular conservative broadcaster called one of the most vile Holocaust deniers in America ‘one of the most honest historians.’ That legitimizes hate — it normalizes it,” Chikli told the New York Post, appearing to refer to Carlson’s past praise of the Holocaust revisionist Darryl Cooper.

Chikli also warned against the rising influence of Fuentes and Cooper among young Americans.

“Antisemitism has become fashionable for Gen Z,” Chikli continued. “They listen to podcasts, not professors. When people like Nick Fuentes or Darryl Cooper are treated as thought leaders, that’s dangerous. These are neo-Nazis.”

The Times of Israel asked Illouz whether he was worried about appearing to interfere with American politics. “Defending the alliance between America and Israel is not interfering,” he said. “I am in touch with many pro-Israel conservatives who know that Candace and Tucker are a threat to America as much as to Israel.”

Top GOP officials, including Vice President JD Vance, have largely dismissed calls from Jewish conservatives, including Ben Shapiro, and others to draw a line against antisemitic influencers.

“Do you think you are the first to try to delegitimize the Jewish people? We are the people of eternity,” said Illouz toward the conclusion of his address, adding that “we will be here long after your YouTube channels are forgotten dust.”

***********************

ERIKA KIRK BUSTED, TRUMP OIL, CANDACE OWENS NAMED
Sabby Sabs
1/11/26

@ 1:24:36


Transcript [start@ 1:24:36]

We're going to get to the story about uh Candace Owens.
Um did I put the same thing twice?
I am so sorry, Corey. I think I put the same Corey's going to be like, "What the
Um, let me just pull this up. There's an announcement that
uh Candace Owens made that I think you guys need to see.
Here we go. I'm sorry, guys. Sometimes I end up
putting the same uh links up.
Um, got it. Okay. All right. Let's go ahead
and get into this next story. Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson have been named by the Lood Party. This is uh crazy.
It's getting crazy out there for both of them. She tweeted this and I'm going to take you to the article. The Lood Party
in Israel just named me and Tucker Carlson as enemies that must be fought.
These people are murderers. Murderers are threatening me and Tucker Carlson over speech. How is that at all
acceptable to our government? So first of all again the LUD party is in Israel.
Just imagine if Russia did that. Imagine if China did that. But because
it's Israel, it gets a pass. Now let's get into this uh article
because I see this um I don't know how Candace sees it, but I kind of see this
as a hit. Let me put this out here. The Knesset member de cries and new enemy
Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens again. Here we go with with Israel naming their
names. Um, and I'm going to need for this uh publication to learn how to make
bigger texts for the love of God. In an address to the Knesset on Monday, Lood
lawmaker Dan Eloo decrieded what he said was a new enemy within American
politics. Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. We are used to enemies from the outside.
We fight terror tunnels of Hamas. We fight they they don't go in the tunnels.
Let me finish. Uh we fight the ballistic missiles of Iran. and you started the
preemptive strikes. But today, I look at the West, our great ally, and I see a
new enemy rising from within. By the way, he's originally from Canada.
See what I said about these settlers? I am speaking of a poison being sold to
the American people as patriotism. I'm speaking of intellectual vandalism of
Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. We highlight this here. Now, why do you
think he named those two people? They're not the only ones that have been
critical of Israel, but he's naming them because they're
conservatives. And like I told you, Israel needs those evangelical Christians.
They're conservatives that have a large platform. They have a large following.
and he sees Tucker and Candace as a problem
for Israel accomplishing its greater mission because like I said, if they lose the evangelicals,
they don't really have much. To me,
this is like a hit list. We talked about before on the show about a year ago, there were a number of American
journalists that were put on Ukrainian uh kill list. like Aaron Mate was one of those people that was put on that on
that kill list. I think Katie Halper was put on one of them as well.
Think about this for a second. So, I don't think this is just them calling him out. I see this as a threat and I
think other people need to take it as a threat as well. His comments came uh as the Republican
party has been royal in recent months by debates over the mainstream
uh mainstreaming of anti-semitic influencers within the GOP. And see there they go. They label them anti-semitic right off the bat. In
October, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson hosted far-right anti-semitic influencer Nick Fuentes on his platform,
igniting outrage from Jewish conservatives who warned of growing reach of anti-semitic voices. This is
another thing I need you guys to pay attention to. Um, Tucker Carlson is not the only uh podcaster that has
interviewed Nick Fuentes. Again, why are they calling out him but
not the others? Think about that for a second. Let's go
on here. Owens had long made anti-semitic rhetoric a hallmark of her
you YouTube channel which has 5.7 million subscribers. A recent analysis
of her content by the Jewish People Policy Institute found that threearters of her videos that mentioned Jews were
anti-Semitic. But again, they keep changing this definition, right? So they keep throwing this word around
hoping it'll sting. They claim to fight the woke left. They are no different
than the woke left. The radical left tears down the statues of Thomas
Jefferson. Tucker Carlson tears down the legacy of Winston Churchill.
What the [Laughter]
I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry. This is hilarious to me. You know why? I would
say that Winston Churchill tore down his own legacy.
They are giving people too much credit for just think, you know what I mean? Times change, people change, people move
on. But now they're saying Tucker Carlson tore down Winston Churchill's legacy. This is hilarious. I'm sorry.
The radical left says Western civilization is evil. Candace Owen says the roots of our faith
are demonic. It is the same sickness.
I don't know what to say. This is wild, fam. Um, let's continue
here. Carlson and Owens are among the right-wing influencers who have made
opposition to Israel a centerpiece of their output at a time when support for Israel is declining among conservatives,
particularly younger conservatives. And there you go. Um, by the way, Tucker
Carlson interviews quite a variety of of people. Everything that he does is not
always about Israel. I've seen so many I've seen him interview Jeffrey Sachs. I mean, I've seen like I've seen a lot of
people like on Tucker Carlson's podcast, you know? It it just to me it's I I
don't know. I don't know. Um I know Candace doesn't interview as many people
as like Tucker does. Um, but even then they're not talking about all the other things that Candace talked about, right?
Like Breijit Mcronone. Um, don't forget um, oh, what's her name? The woman
married to Ryan Reynolds. I always forget this girl's name. Um, but the Justin Baldini story. Remember that?
Like she dove into that? She also did a whole series series about Kla Harris. They didn't have anything to say about
Candace Owens then. Let's continue on here.
In November, Amit Chai Chickley, the Israeli Diaspora
minister, echoed Aloo's concerns in an interview with the New York Post, telling the outlet that he was far more
concerned about anti-semitism on the right than on the left. The comments were notable because Chickley is himself
a right-wing anti-work uh warrior in a first for Israel has stoked
relationships with far-right European parties that in some cases have ties to Nazis. Jesus Christ.
One of the worst moments was when popular conservative broadcaster called one of the most vile um Holocaust
deniers in America one of the most honest historians. That legitimizes
hate. it normalizes it. Uh so they go on to talk about him there. Uh back to
Candace and Tucker, the Times of Israel as to lose whether
he was worried about appearing to interfere with American politics, defending the alliance between America
and Israel is not interfering. I'm in touch with many pro-Israel conservatives who know that Candace and Tucker are a
threat to America as much as to Israel.
So there you have it.
So, the message has been put out that this guy feels as though Candace
Owens and Tucker Carlson got to go,
that they are a threat to Israel. And I would say essentially I feel like
he put out a hit right now. Let's see what is being said.
Here's one of the things I think that is probably really going to disturb them. Candace calling out Jerry Fwell.
Does everybody remember Jerry Fwell? I do. Candace Owens just leaked that the
government of Israel gifted a private jet to Jerry Fwell to buy the loyalty of American evangelicals. See, again, I
told you that's the gold mine for them. They need the the evangelicals. In 1948,
the very year that Israel became a nation, Carrie Hezekiah died from cerosis of the liver and his son Jerry
Fwell senior had an immediate radical conversion to Christianity, bootlegging, trafficking, smuggling be damned because
his business was now going to be the church ministering. He became a televangelist and he established
Lynchberg College in 1971 which would eventually change its name to Liberty
University. Liberty University that we know today. And yes, it is true. In 1979, Jerry Fwell senior was gifted a
leerjet from the founder of the Lood Party, then prime minister of Israel,
Medakim Bean. So there we go. The Lood Party again. So
the LUD party gifting things to Jerry Fwell and it is is the Lood party that
named Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson in that article. So I believe many of
these televangelists have been controlled uh from day one. Um you know
my mom used to watch televangelists back in the day and I used to be like how we not know this is a scam. Like they would
sit there and just basically say, "Donate money." And they would say, "We healed this person." And I'm like, "How do we know that person really got
healed?" I mean, we saw them walk up to the pastor and then, "How do we know that's real? How do I know that's not an
actor? How do I know?" You know, just asking these questions, that type of thing. The televangelists have
tremendous reach and have continued to have it. Uh people like Joel Austin is a big one, by the way. These guys are mega
rich. Uh TD Jake is another big. These these guys are loaded loaded.
And then there was uh what is it? The 700 Club. I remember back in the day um
you know they also very pro-Israel uh supporting this, defending it. FM just
brought up another one that I forgot about. That was Jimmy Baker. Like a lot
of money went into making sure that Christians would support Israel.
Lot of money, honey. Now, that's pretty nice of Israel.
But I always am wondering in exchange for what? Like, in exchange for what?
Because that kind of reminds me about how BBNet and Yahoo wanted to take Turning Point to the Turning Point USA
to the next level. He offered to take Turning Point USA to the next level. Charlie Kirk said no. But apparently
nobody in the mainstream media is interested in answering the question as to why he wanted to take turning point
to the US to USA to the next level. What does Israel have to do with young evangelicals, a young evangelical
organization? Also, how that's my other big question. How exactly was he planning to get that
money into Turning Point USA? I'm assuming he wasn't going to write like a blank check from the LUD party. Surely
uh he was going to accomplish accomplish that through other people and their organizations because Israel never gets
their hands dirty if they can avoid it. That's the lesson of yesterday, by the way. You employ Christians to do your
dirty work. So, that is obviously not something that
they would be fond of. That was uh more recent calling that out. I've been trying to tell you guys like when they
sent those pastors over to Israel, you already know what you already know what the mission is going to be. Now, Gen
XGirl, let's give her a shout out, round of applause for Gen XGirl because she made an entire spreadsheet of all the
churches that were represented that were part of that propaganda. Um, so like I said, if if you're still going to church
and if your pastor comes back and starts saying these types of things, you know,
you might want to start asking some questions. Why Tucker Carlson?
Here's something he said uh more recently. You guys know he's been really on and on about free speech. Listen to
this. You're about to hear are much much more
common than you may realize. Here he is. The amount of hate speech that we've
seen during this time. I mean, it's it's off the charts. You look through social media, you see it even on uh television,
the the lines, they're not even blurred anymore. They're gone. How do you even begin to to tackle such a a phenomenon?
Well, I think we have to have an understanding that first of all, in this country, we believe very strongly in free speech. It's the basis in our
constitution and we also believe in the freedom of religion. You have to balance
that. But you balance that in two ways. Europe has paid speech laws, probably
some of the best on the books, but it's selectively enforced. So, if you selectively enforce the rule, it's not
going to have any effect whatsoever. And you can see how it's had no effect in Europe in laundering and stopping the
hate. So this guy is something called the anti-semitisms are. It's an office set
up by George W. Bush like most insane unjustifiable things. Anti-semitisms are
at the State Department focused on one specific kind of ethnic hate. Not protecting all Americans.
There is no like stop anti-white hate are of course and there never will be because the same people who are upset
about hate are promoting that kind of hate. But whatever it's one specific group protected somehow by the United
States. Imagine if I called myself the Black Zar. Like just just think about this for
a second guys. Like that it's silly, right? I know like haha but it's just
ridiculous. Imagine if I called myself Sabrina Salvat, the Black Zar.
This is the dumbest thing I ever heard of, right? But but here we are.
State Department. But this is a guy who actually has a job in administration
saying it's great. European hate crimes laws are great. Well, first of all,
every single one of them is immoral. And two, they're all contrary to the
first amendment. You couldn't have laws like that here. And three, when you actually look at those laws that Rabbi
Yehuda Kaplon is saying are so great, they're used to suppress Christianity.
That's what they actually are. Of course, so now you got Tucker Carlson
criticizing rabbis. So the Lud party definitely is not going to like that. So that's another one, right? that he's
criticizing the rabbis and they're just like, "Oh no, he's calling him out." And I think with Tucker Carlson, his criticism of Israel over time since the
genocide started. It it moved rather
steadily. Like he didn't come out on day one and just say, "Oh, [ __ ] them mofos." Like that's it. That's a wrap. This is
insane. He tread lightly at first and kind of, you know, just wad it in the
water a little bit and then started noticing more and more and actually he became more critical about what Israel
was doing under the Trump administration than under the Biden administration. And I I think maybe he expected Trump to to
come in and fix all of that. Um like Trump said he would, but you know how that is. But he took his time like kind
of getting there and they already and but they're naming him
when there's there were people who came out on day one that were very very vocal and critical of Israel not named. So
what is it about these two again? I think it's that they have a massive following. Candace at one point was a
part of Turning Point USA. So I think they look at her as like a traitor. They're like betrayal. Tucker was a part
of Fox News. You know, he describes himself as as a Christian, but why these
two? I mentioned the platform, but what else?
If you think of another reason, let let me know. What is it about those two? You don't see them. They didn't name Dave
Smith. Dave Smith went hard against Israel on day one.
Think about that for a second. and creativity and freedom of thought
and individual conscience and the humanity of the populations of European countries all suppressed by this but
Christianity is always number one so in Finland for example one of the lead opposition political leaders is now on
trial why why is she on trial because she tweeted a quote from Romans
the epistle to the Romans by St. Paul, you may have heard of it. It's a significant book in the New Testament.
And in it, he describes basic Christian sexual ethics. You know, like one man, one woman
against other forms of sexual expression. That's Christianity.
And that was deemed a hate crime under the law, under those European hate crimes laws, hate speech laws that Rabbi
Yehuda Kaplon is saying we should emulate but maybe enforce a little tougher, more selectively.
This is what will destroy the country and divide the country and make people hate each other. Whenever the US
government protects one group and allows others to be attacked, whenever the US government
promotes one group and suppresses another group, it's primmaaccia unfair.
But it's also the most divisive thing you could ever do to any country. And there it is. I think at that point
they felt Tucker Carlson had also said too much, right? because you're admitting that Israel is oppressing
another group of people and also occupying another group of people. Uh the Nick Fuentes thing I think really
pissed them off, but like I said, he's not the only one that interviewed Nick Fuentes. So why so much focus on him?
Nick Fuentes, you know, he went on Candace's show, he went on Dave Smith's show, he went on uh Pierce Morgan show,
although Pierce Morgan uh definitely fought back harder against him, but he's been on a number of shows.
So they look at people like Tucker and Candace and they say I think hey they
have tremendous influence we have to go after them. But first of all um another
country you you have no right to tell the US or to tell Americans what they
need to do about people right here in the United States.
That's the part that I find to be very damning that another country is saying
you guys need to do something about Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens.
And I say deception is a hell of a drug because you know here's something to think about. Had it not been for October
7th, do we get here?
Do more people wake up if there's no October 7th?
I I don't think they do. I've been talking about the Israel is issue since the day I started this
channel, which is 2021 when I started this show. I think the
channel started end of 2019. End of 2019, but I started the podcast 2021.
So, it it makes you wonder what's happening there. But I have great
offense for people who are
naming Americans, putting them on some list as to like
Donald Trump or whoever is in charge over there. You need to get your people in line. I have serious problem with
that. We get called all types of names if we even just criticize Israel.
But here you guys are telling us what we need to do and who needs to be
controlled. So pay attention to the free speech laws, pay attention to the definitions.
We continue to cover updates on that. Um because they really do want to silence
people and right now it looks like they're trying to silence people with the biggest microphone, which is Tucker
Carlson and Candace Owens. All right, ladies and gents. Let's keep
it moving and grooving. We're doing pretty good on time. Uh, smash the like button if you haven't had a chance to do
so. And if you're new, don't forget to like, sub, and share like a Care Bear.
Let's keep it moving on. We're going to the next story. Speaking of Israel, we got a problem.
We got a problem. Got a problem. Got a problem. Um, I for one take more offense
to actions than rhetoric, but lately what I have been seeing is
politicians and those alike showing more outrage and
frustration over rhetoric that is against Israel instead of
Israel's actions.

[admin]

New Footage EXPOSES Erika Kirk’s HANDLER │ This Woman Is Even Worse…
Statecraft
Jan 17, 2026 #erikakirk #politicalnews #politics
New Footage EXPOSES Erika Kirk’s HANDLER │ This Woman Is Even Worse…

As if one fake-crying Erika Kirk wasn’t already insulting enough, now we find out she’s got another blonde, creepy-eyed, professional tear-wiper as her HANDLER?!

Her name is Stacy Sheridan, and if you pay attention to Erika’s public appearances since Charlie’s death, you’ll notice that Stacy is ALWAYS by her side!!

Even at Charlie’s Medal of Honor ceremony, Erika wasn’t standing next to Charlie’s grieving parents. Instead, it was Stacy glued to her side.

So who is this woman??! And why are people saying she’s actually WORSE than Erika?

Well, here’s what TPUSA insiders are saying…Stacy is reportedly known behind the scenes as the “grifter-in-chief.” Why? Because she allegedly siphoned MILLIONS of dollars out of Turning Point USA through a web of shady companies tied back to her!

Stacy was listed as a Senior Advancement Director at Turning Point USA, but her title kept quietly changing, and now she’s listed as Senior Director of Development.



Transcript

Erica, Grace, and I will support you and your
babies the way you and Charlie were
there for us in our darkest days.
Charlie,
we will miss your words of wisdom,
your high-pitched laugh. It was kind of
awkward.
Turning Point USA is continuing and it
is. I mean, we are so blessed to have
more work than we even
could ever dream of. I mean, it's it's
beautiful.
Despite the devastating loss of Charlie
Kirk, my incredible husband at UVU,
Caleb has persisted with the same grim,
excuse me, gift. As if one fake crying
Erica Kirk wasn't already insulting
enough, now we find out she's got
another blonde, creepy eyed,
professional tear wiper as her handler.
Her name is Stacy Sheridan. And if you
pay attention to Erica's public
appearances since Charlie's death,
you'll notice that Stacy is always by
her side. Even at Charlie's Medal of
Honor ceremony, Erica wasn't standing
next to Charlie's grieving parents.
Instead, it was Stacy glued to her side.
So, who is this woman? And why are
people saying she's actually worse than
Erica? Well, here's what TPUSA insiders
are saying. Stacy is reportedly known
behind the scenes as the grifter chief.
Why? because she allegedly siphoned
millions of dollars out of TurningPoint
USA through a web of shady companies
tied back to her. Stacy was listed as a
senior advancement director at
TurningPoint USA, but her title kept
quietly changing and now she's listed as
senior director of development. Either
way, what this really means is that
Stacy brings wealthy donors on board to
TPUSA and earns huge cuts and
commissions for doing so. But that's
really just the tip of the iceberg. Once
you start looking into Stacy, there's so
much creepy stuff that comes up that it
ends up making Erica look innocent by
comparison, and that's saying something.
But it was his naive, audaciousness.
Yes, technically Charlie was my boss,
but it really never felt that way. Do
you see anything wrong with this photo?
There is a noticeable gap between Erica
Kirk and Charlie's parents during the
Presidential Medal of Freedom ceremony.
Why aren't they consoling each other?
Instead, you have Stacy Sheridan holding
Erica. This screams PR move and not
grief from Erica. While Charlie's
parents are the only ones who look
genuinely devastated. And then here's
Stacy again sitting next to Erica in the
car on their way to speak at Charlie's
memorial.
Love you.
Love you.
But if you thought Erica's acting skills
were cringe, just wait until you see
Stacy. She honestly gives Erica a run
for her money when it comes to wiping
non-existent tears. At least Erica had
the decency to bring a handkerchief as a
prop. Stacy doesn't even bother. There
was a moment when Stacy spoke at
Charlie's memorial where she did this
quick little gesture like she's wiping
away a tear, except there's clearly
nothing there. Charlie,
we will miss your words of wisdom.
Your high-pitched laugh. It was kind of
awkward.
And the way your voice would always
soften when you spoke to Erica and your
children.
But that's not even the worst part about
Stacy's speech. This was supposed to be
in eulogy, but let's dissect what Stacy
actually said.
My name is Stacy Sheridan. Eight years
ago, I met Charlie in a crowded ballroom
in West Palm Beach at a David Horowitz
Freedom Center event. I met him at a
very important big donor event. Name
drop David Horowitz, of course. Oh, and
it was in Palm Beach of all places, but
don't think much of it. It's just a
coincidence. And then Stacy immediately
points out that she didn't think much of
Charlie at first.
We spoke briefly. We exchanged cards and
I thought nothing of it.
Okay, that's an interesting way to start
a eulogy. And then Stacy says Charlie
went on a quest to hire her and what
finally convinced her, how naive he was.
Let that sink in.
What ultimately
made me want to join Charlie's cause in
Charlie's team because he began a quest
to hire me after meeting me.
I was reluctant at first, but it was his
naive audaciousness
to change the world that ultimately sold
me. Now, this next part is equally wild
because Stacy goes on to talk about how,
yeah, technically Charlie was her boss.
Cue the grimacing little smile. But she
always thought of him as her little
brother.
Yes, technically Charlie was my boss.
But it really never felt that way. Far
more than my boss. I felt like he was my
little brother.
I'm sorry, what? With employees like
this, who needs enemies? But it gets
worse. Remember I mentioned earlier that
staff at TPUSA allegedly call Stacy
Sheridan Grifter and Chief? Well,
wouldn't it be wild if I told you that
Stacy was pulling in about $180,000 a
year as a senior advancement director?
You know, the person whose job is to
raise money for Turning Point USA while
also owning multiple entities that were
bringing in millions for her personally.
And imagine this. Stacy shows up on a
form 990 as a key employee. But then
suddenly she doesn't and she's missing
from the other 990 altogether. But
here's the thing. She still shows up on
the website in the Wayback Machine. So
what does this mean? It means they
quietly scrubbed her off the site so
nobody would notice. According to
research by user at Dangster Intel on X,
Stacy is getting paid as an employee
while also being quietly hidden as an
employee. And on top of that, she's
taking a commission on every single
fundraiser she brings in through her own
companies. This is what you call triple
dipping. Here's how the game works.
Stacy's hired as a fundraiser. She's on
a salary. That's already one stream of
income. Then she goes and sets up her
own LLC's,
multiple ones. Cloverstone Ventures,
Lion Rock Ventures, GSM Strategies, too
many to name. And then suddenly the
money that's being raised for Turning
Point USA is being routed through
Stacy's companies. And what happens
next? She takes a cut. We're talking
commissions in the hundreds of
thousands. 500K here, 100K there. And
before you know it, it adds up to
millions of dollars. that she's actually
raising money as a fundraiser hired by
the company being paid a salary and then
she creates an LLC. She's got
Cloverstone Ventures, Lion Rock
Ventures, GSM Strategies, and she's
taking money, millions of dollars for
Turning Point USA. She's filtering it
through her company, taking a commission
in the $500,000 range and the $100,000
range.
Think about how insane that is. Stacy is
literally taking a commission off the
very job she's already being paid a
salary to do using her own personally
interested LLC. And she's not even
filling out the proper paperwork to
disclose it. Because here's the thing,
there are required forms for this.
Schedule L, schedule G. This stuff is
supposed to be clearly spelled out on
the 990. So donors know what's
happening, the IRS knows what's
happening, and there's transparency.
Instead, the information is being
hidden. So, you have to ask yourself,
why would Stacy Sheridan come in, do all
of this, and then go out of her way to
hide it? Why be listed on the website at
all, and then suddenly get taken off the
website? Doesn't that strike you as a
little shady? You can't even find her
anymore unless you already know her name
and specifically search for it. That's
not normal. She's listed as a senior
advancement director, a senior
developer. The title changes all the
time. You can see it all over the
website history. And yet somehow she's
nowhere to be found on the form 990's
where she absolutely should be
disclosed. I'll let you decide what that
means. But looking at all of this
together, this is some pretty damning
information. And this of course raises
serious questions about that internal
TPUSA audit Charlie wanted to do.
Candace Owens discovered that just days
before he was assassinated, Charlie sent
an internal memo to his employees
announcing an audit of TPUSA. In other
words, he was asking for a full
financial review exactly where all the
money was going and who was actually
getting it. Then there arrived a moment
when Charlie felt that the money was
disappearing. He felt that again
according to sources that the company
was burning through cash too quickly.
And Charlie said about finding out why
and how this was happening. Candace even
obtained a screenshot of Charlie's memo
dated September 2nd where he directed
staff to get serious about the
organization's finances and tighten
things up. So on September 2nd, which is
of course just one week before he lost
his life, Charlie surprised the company
uh by announcing that he was putting
together a Doge department. There's a
lot of pork. We don't know where this
money is going. People are just
accepting checks. Again, this is the
whole purpose of the department of Joe
Doge. you put us in there and we're
going to figure out how all these
bureaucrats are just wasting tax
dollars. Um, really kind of a nice way
of saying we're going to conduct an
audit of the government, right? That's
the only way to look at what Doge was.
It's an audit and then you cut the fat
and you see where the money's actually
going. So, it's clear he was taking
steps to get a full handle on where
Turning Point USA was actually going.
And he wasn't just making casual
suggestions. He actually started putting
systems in place to make sure donor's
money was being used properly. And then
you look at Stacy Sheridan. This is the
same woman who claimed she never thought
of Charlie as her boss, but as her
little brother, all while allegedly
funneling millions of dollars through
her own companies and shady donor
schemes. And now she's always there,
right by Erica's side, acting like her
handler. So, what's really going on
here? You start to connect the dots, and
it gets uncomfortable fast. Remember
when Erica accidentally said grift
instead of grit? That slip of the tongue
suddenly feels less like a mistake and
more like the only moment Erica actually
told the truth. Caleb has persisted with
the same grift, excuse me,

[admin]

Israel to honor Charlie Kirk with award for fighting antisemitism
by AP
Updated 1:17 AM MST, January 15, 2026
https://apnews.com/article/israel-charl ... 613da0ee2b

... In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.

By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”

“He was afraid of them,” the source emphasized...

This July, at his TPUSA Student Action Summit, Kirk provided a forum for the right-wing grassroots to vent its fury about Israel’s political hammerlock on the Trump administration. There, speakers from former Fox News stalwarts Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, to the anti-Zionist Jewish comedian Dave Smith, denounced Israel’s blood-soaked assault on the besieged Gaza Strip, branded Jeffrey Epstein as an Israeli intelligence asset, and openly taunted Zionist billionaires like Bill Ackman for “getting away with scams” despite having “no actual skills.”

Following the confab, Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu’s wealthy allies in the US, including many who had funded TPUSA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line.

“He was being told what you’re not allowed to do, and it was driving him crazy,” Kirk’s friend recalled. The conservative youth leader was not only alienated by the hostile nature of the interactions, but “frightened” by the backlash....

Kirk appeared visibly outraged during an August 6 interview with conservative host Megyn Kelly, as he discussed the menacing messages he was receiving from pro-Israel bigwigs.

“It’s all of the sudden: ‘oh, Charlie: he’s no longer with us.’ Wait a second—what does ‘with us’ mean, exactly? I’m an American, okay? I represent this country,” he explained, before addressing the powerful Zionist interests harassing him.

“The more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question—which is not isolated, it would be one thing if it were just one text, or two texts; it is dozens of texts—then we start to say, ‘whoa, hold the boat here,’” Kirk continued. “To be fair, some really good Jewish friends say, ‘that’s not all of us’… But these are leaders here. These are stakeholders.”

He went on to complain to Kelly, “I have less ability… to criticize the Israeli government than actual Israelis do. And that’s really, really weird.”

-- Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death, friend reveals, by Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil, September 12, 2025

A Trump insider and longtime friend of Charlie Kirk tells The Grayzone how the assassinated conservati

The source said anxiety spread within the Trump administration after an apparent Israeli spying operation was uncovered.

Max Blumenthal and The Grayzone report that Charlie Kirk was undergoing a significant political and personal transformation in the months leading up to his assassination on September 10, 2025, marked by a growing distance from Israel and its powerful backers.

• Kirk refused a major funding offer from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, reportedly to avoid being pressured into silence on critical issues.
• He became increasingly angry and frightened by intense backlash from wealthy Zionist donors and pro-Israel elites, including figures like Bill Ackman and Robert Shillman, who reportedly convened a private "intervention" to pressure him.
• In interviews with Megyn Kelly and Ben Shapiro, Kirk expressed concern over the suppression of criticism of Israel, noting he had less freedom to criticize Israel than actual Israelis.
• His shift was not just political—sources describe a spiritual transformation, including a move away from evangelical Christianity and the Judeo-Christian alliance narrative that once defined his brand, toward attending Catholic mass with his wife.
• This pivot alienated his traditional base and donors, leading to a private campaign of intimidation and messages that left him feeling targeted and isolated.

The Grayzone’s reporting suggests Kirk’s evolving stance—critical of Israel’s influence in U.S. politics and its conduct in Gaza—was a direct challenge to the pro-Israel establishment, which may have contributed to the circumstances surrounding his death.

-- google ai

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel will honor the late Charlie Kirk for his work combating antisemitism at a conference in late January, four months after the conservative activist was assassinated while speaking at an American university.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said Wednesday evening that Kirk will be given an award at the International Conference on Combating Antisemitism in Jerusalem. Several pro-Israeli leaders are expected to attend the event, among them Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama and former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz.

This year will be the second time Israel’s government hosts the conference, which it says is “dedicated to confronting antisemitism and Holocaust denial in today’s world.”

Kirk was a staunch supporter of Israel. After his death, Netanyahu described him as a “lion-hearted friend” of the country and a “defender of our common Judeo-Christian civilization.”

The Turning Point USA co-founder frequently invoked scripture and prophecy to urge American Christians and conservatives to stand by the country against its enemies.

But some of his comments about Jewish philanthropy and Hollywood drew accusations of antisemitism. And as debates over Israel have emerged among American conservatives, his legacy on the issue has become contested. Last year, speaking on The Megyn Kelly Show, he said support for Israel had become so rigid that he felt unable to voice even mild criticism of its policies.