Anti-Anti-Nazi Barbarian Hordes are Knocking Down the Gates

[admin]

Houthis Bomb IDF General Staff HQ, Israeli Port? 3rd Revenge Attack In 24 Hours After PM’s Killing
Hindustan Times
Sep 2, 2025 #Houthis #Israel #DroneAttack

In retaliation for the strike that killed their prime minister, the Houthis launched a wave of drone attacks targeting Israel’s General Staff HQ in Tel Aviv, Ben Gurion Airport, Ashdod Port, and Hadera power station. Reports also indicate a strike on a ship in the Red Sea, following an earlier tanker attack. With tensions escalating, the region edges closer to all‑out war between the Houthis and Israel.



***************************

Houthis BOMB IDF HQs in Tel Aviv BREAKING: Houthis Sammad-4 Drones, Yafa Missiles Pound Israel
Oneindia News
Premiered 2 hours ago #Houthis #Israel #HouthisVsIsrael

Yemen’s Houthi forces have escalated their attacks, claiming strikes on IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv using advanced Sammad-4 drones and Yafa ballistic missiles. The unprecedented assault marks one of the boldest Houthi operations against Israel, signaling a dangerous new phase in the conflict. Reports suggest multiple projectiles targeted strategic military sites, while Israeli defenses scrambled to respond.



***********************************

Houthi PM Killing Sparks Revenge On Israel With 2nd Attack In 24 Hrs; After Missiles, Now Drone Hit
Hindustan Times
8.49M subscribers
Sep 2, 2025 #houthis #israel #dronestrike

The Houthis have intensified their attacks on Israel, launching a second drone strike within just 24 hours. Israeli Air Force forces [say they] successfully intercepted the drone before it could breach the country’s airspace, preventing potential damage. This wave of aggression comes in direct retaliation after an Israeli airstrike killed a senior Houthi political leader, escalating tensions in an already volatile region. The cycle of attack and retaliation highlights the growing instability in the Middle East and raises concerns about further escalation between Iran-backed militias and Israel.

[admin]

After Snapping Ties With Israel, Erdogan Jolts Netanyahu With Big ‘Palestine’ Demand From Trump
Hindustan Times
Sep 2, 2025 #Erdogan #Trump #Palestine

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has demanded that U.S. President Donald Trump reverse a travel ban on Palestinian Authority officials ahead of the UN General Assembly. Erdogan called the move a violation of UN principles and a political favour to Israel. As Turkey pushes for genocide charges against Israel and stronger recognition for Palestine, tensions rise globally over the Gaza conflict and U.S. foreign policy.

[admin]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 76.0_2.pdf

United States District Court
Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 25-cv-04870-CRB

OPINION GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Congress spoke clearly in 1878 when it passed the Posse Comitatus Act, prohibiting the use of the U.S. military to execute domestic law. Nearly 140 years later, Defendants—President Trump, Secretary of Defense Hegseth, and the Department of Defense—deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles, ostensibly to quell a rebellion and ensure that federal immigration law was enforced. There were indeed protests in Los Angeles, and some individuals engaged in violence. Yet there was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law.

Nevertheless, at Defendants’ orders and contrary to Congress’s explicit instruction, federal troops executed the laws. The evidence at trial established that Defendants systematically used armed soldiers (whose identity was often obscured by protective armor) and military vehicles to set up protective perimeters and traffic blockades, engage in crowd control, and otherwise demonstrate a military presence in and around Los Angeles. In short, Defendants violated the Posse Comitatus Act.

Almost three months after Defendants first deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles, 300 National Guard members remain stationed there. Moreover, President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have stated their intention to call National Guard troops into federal service in other cities across the country—including Oakland and San Francisco, here in the Northern District of California—thus creating a national police force with the President as its chief. Because there is an ongoing risk that Defendants will act unlawfully and thereby injure Plaintiffs, Governor Newsom and the State of California, the Court ENJOINS Defendants from violating the Posse Comitatus Act as detailed below.

[admin]

Judge Rules Trump's Deployment Of Military To LA Is Illegal; Orders Him To STOP!
Glenn Kirschner
Sep 2, 2025

After a full trial, a federal judge in California ruled that Trump's grabbing control of the California National Guard and his deployment of the military to the streets of Los Angeles was illegal, and ordered him to stop violating the Posse Comitatus Act, a federal law that prohibits the military from enforcing civilian law.

As Politico reported, "Judge rules Trump can't act as national police chief."



Transcript

So friends, a federal judge in
California just ruled that Donald Trump
violated federal law when he sent troops
into the streets of Los Angeles.
Will Trump care? Will he obey the
court's order in the form of an
injunction to stop violating federal
law?
Let's talk about that because justice
matters.
Hey all, Glen Kersner here. So friends,
after a full trial on the legality of
Donald Trump taking control of the
California National Guard and in
addition deploying military forces to
the streets of LA, a federal judge just
ruled that Donald Trump violated the law
and ordered him to stop.
Let's start with the new reporting. This
from Politico
headline. Judge rules Trump can't act as
national police chief. The president
broke the law when he deployed troops to
Los Angeles. Judge Charles Brier ruled.
And that article begins, "A federal
judge has declared President Donald
Trump's use of military troops in Los
Angeles illegal, barring the Pentagon
from using National Guard members and
Marines from performing police functions
like arrests and crowd control." In a
52-page ruling, US District Judge
Charles Brier warned that Trump appears
intent on creating a national police
force with the president as its chief.
Trump build his deployment of troops to
Los Angeles starting in early June as a
way of bolstering immigration
enforcement efforts amid protests in the
city against the president's deportation
agenda. Though Trump has now withdrawn
all but 300 of those troops, he is
mulling sending troops to other major
cities such as Chicago. He has also
deployed the National Guard in
Washington DC under a separate legal
authority from the one he used in Los
Angeles. Judge Brier, a Clinton
appointee based in San Francisco,
concluded that Trump's LA deployment, an
operation overseen by Defense Secretary
Pete Hegsth, violated a longstanding law
meant to prevent domestic law
enforcement by the military. The Posi
Kamatus Act. The judge's decision
followed a 4-day trial last month that
included testimony from the Pentagon
officials overseeing the troop
deployment in Los Angeles. The Posi
Kamatus Act of 1878
bars the military from enforcing
domestic laws without explicit
permission from Congress. But Judge
Brier said that despite this
restriction, the Pentagon systematically
used armed soldiers to perform police
functions. And now, friends, let's just
jump right to the first few paragraphs
of Judge Briar's clear, definitive,
compelling ruling setting out that
Donald Trump, again, violated federal
law.
In the case of Gavin Newsome at all and
others plaintiffs versus Donald Trump at
all and others defendants opinion
granting injunctive relief.
Congress spoke clearly in 1878 when it
passed the Posi Kamatus Act prohibiting
the use of US military to execute
domestic law. Nearly 140 years later,
defendants President Trump, Secretary of
Defense Hegsth, and the Department of
Defense deployed the National Guard and
Marines to Los Angeles ostensibly to
quell a rebellion and ensure that
federal immigration law was enforced.
There were indeed protests in Los
Angeles and some individuals engaged in
violence. Yet there was no rebellion,
nor was civilian law enforcement unable
to respond to the protests and enforce
the law. Nevertheless, at defendants
orders, Trump and Hegsth's orders, and
contrary to Congress's explicit
instruction, federal troops executed the
laws. The evidence at trial established
that defendants systematically used
armed soldiers whose identity was often
obscured by protective armor and
military vehicles to set up protective
perimeters and traffic blockades,
engage in crowd control, and otherwise
demonstrate a military presence in and
around Los Angeles. In short, defendants
violated the Posi Kamatus Act. Almost 3
months after defendants first deployed
the National Guard to Los Angeles, 300
National Guard members remain stationed
there. Moreover, President Trump and
Secretary Hegsth have stated their
intention to call National Guard troops
into federal service in other cities
across the country, including Oakland
and San Francisco here in the Northern
District of California. thus creating a
national police force with the president
as its chief. Because there is an
ongoing risk that defendants will act
unlawfully and thereby injure plaintiffs
Governor Nuome in the state of
California. The court enjoins defendants
from violating the posi commatatus act
as detailed below.
So friends, here we are again with a
federal court ruling after a trial that
Donald Trump violated federal law and
with the federal judge ordering that he
stop.
Will he? Or will Trump continue to send
troops into the streets of other
American cities? And if he does, there
will be no straightfaced argument that
he's acting lawfully.
You know, at that point, he will clearly
be a runaway, lawless president of the
United States.
You know, friends, it seems to me that a
president loses his legitimacy,
and no, I'm not pretending that Donald
Trump has even an ounce of legitimacy
left at this point, but a president
should lose his legitimacy
when he repeatedly acts lawlessly
when he refuses to acknowledge the
lawful authority of a co-equal branch of
government. When he repeatedly defies
court orders, a president loses his
status as a legitimate president of the
United States because he has abandoned
our constitutional construct of
government.
Now, Judge Brier ruled against Trump,
ordered him to stop, but stayed his
ruling, paused it for 10 days until
September 12th to, of course, give
Donald Trump and his administration, his
Department of Justice, an opportunity to
appeal it, ultimately up to the Supreme
Court to see if
the six justice radical right-wing
majority on the Supreme Court will again
accept and embrace and endorse Donald
Trump's lawlessness. That is always
Trump's hope.
But at some point, friends, this is
going to come to a head probably sooner
rather than later, given the pace of
Donald Trump's lawlessness and
unconstitutionality.
It will come to a head. And when it
does,
the rule of law should must win and
Donald Trump should must
lose
because justice
matters.
Friends, as always, please stay safe,
please stay tuned, and I look forward to
talking with you all again tomorrow.