Denial is a River in Egypt

Denial is a River in Egypt

Postby admin » Sat Feb 13, 2021 9:43 pm

Denial: It's Not Just a River in Egypt
Not everything needs our attention, but some things do.
by Jennifer Kunst Ph.D.
Psychology Today
Posted Aug 31, 2011

Last week's post, "Is Ignorance Bliss?" generated some heated discussion among readers. It is so tempting to pit one extreme against the other as if to say that either utter ignorance or utter knowledge is bliss. As several readers pointed out, perhaps it is not an either-or issue. Balance is the key.

The comments got me thinking about one of our most popular and favorite psychological defenses: denial. As the old saying goes, denial is not just a river in Egypt—it is a force in all of our lives.

Actually, denial is probably essential for psychological survival. If we were aware of everything, the mind couldn't process it all. By everything, I mean all of the complex and often contradictory thoughts, feelings, and impulses that are in us and around us at any given time. Some of these experiences are too much to bear—too painful, too frightening, too overwhelming. If we were constantly in touch with awareness of all the dangers and longings of life, we would not function very well.

So the mind has developed an elegant kind of self-security system, where defenses like denial can be used to keep us from going crazy and to help us cope with the many demands of internal and external reality. By way of denial, we put unwanted and frightening impulses on the shelf; we turn a blind eye to them. To use a popular psychological term, we "compartmentalize." We unconsciously place them out of awareness so we can deal. In this limited way, denial is helpful.

But problems in life come when we use denial too extensively, too rigidly, too intensely. It is one thing when we bury our head in the sand for a day or two because we feel overwhelmed, but it is another thing if we make a lifestyle out of it—denying awareness of important things for too long. For a short time, it may be safe to ignore the squeaking brakes on our car, the IRS letter that arrived in the mail, the rash on the breast, the emotional distance of a loved one, the nagging feeling of guilt, the weather report about the upcoming storm. Often, such things resolve themselves; no harm, no foul. But if those important bits of information about important things grow and persist over time, denial could be the kiss of death.

A lifestyle of "not-knowing" requires that we subscribe to the old adage that what we don't know won't hurt us. But the evidence of life shows that this just isn't true. As a way of life, hear no evil-see no evil-speak no evil is a recipe for disaster. Denial may offer the appeal of short-term bliss, but it prevents us from taking responsibility for things that really do matter, things we could do something about.

On an individual level, denial can prevent us from doing all we can do to protect our health, safety, and all that we really value in life. Those things don't protect themselves. Our lives need our oversight, our care, our conscientious maintenance. Without our awareness of responsibility for ourselves, psychological forces—just like the natural force of entropy—pull us toward an infantile state of mind that is ultimately self-destructive. And, at the risk of getting political, if we as a society adopt denial in a widespread way about important things, we contribute to our own demise.

One aspect of mature psychological life is flexibility. It is helpful to see the big picture and to keep life in perspective. We cannot function well if we worry over and take responsibility for every little thing. It is safe and helpful to put some things on the shelf, to let them pass by. But if we make denial a way of life, then we turn a blind eye to important matters about which we could do and need to do something constructive. As individuals and as a society, we need to discern what is essential and bring our best selves to it.

To put it simply, not everything needs our full attention, but some things do.

Copyright 2011 Jennifer L. Kunst, Ph.D.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36119
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Denial is a River in Egypt

Postby admin » Sat Feb 13, 2021 10:15 pm

Pun
by Wikipedia
Accessed: 2/13/21

Image
KLEPTOROUMANIA. Punch cartoon of the Second Balkan War. King Carol I of Romania points his pistol at King Peter I of Serbia and King Constantine of Greece while he steals Southern Dobrudja from the disarmed Tsar Ferdinand of Bulgaria. The title "KLEPTOROUMANIA" is a pun on kleptomania, the mental disorder of impulsive stealing for the sake of stealing (using a then-familiar anglicization of Romania's name).

The pun, also called paronomasia, is a form of word play that exploits multiple meanings of a term, or of similar-sounding words, for an intended humorous or rhetorical effect. These ambiguities can arise from the intentional use of homophonic, homographic, metonymic, or figurative language. A pun differs from a malapropism in that a malapropism is an incorrect variation on a correct expression, while a pun involves expressions with multiple (correct or fairly reasonable) interpretations. Puns may be regarded as in-jokes or idiomatic constructions, especially as their usage and meaning are usually specific to a particular language or its culture.

Puns have a long history in human writing. For example, the Roman playwright Plautus was famous for his puns and word games.[1][2]

The Christian Church is said to be founded on Christ's pun: ‘thou art Peter, and upon this rock [petros] I will build my church’ (Matthew 16:18).

Typology

Puns can be classified in various ways.

Homophonic

The homophonic pun, a common type, uses word pairs which sound alike (homophones) but are not synonymous.[3] Walter Redfern summarized this type with his statement, "To pun is to treat homonyms as synonyms."[4] For example, in George Carlin's phrase "atheism is a non-prophet institution", the word prophet is put in place of its homophone profit, altering the common phrase "non-profit institution". Similarly, the joke "Question: Why do we still have troops in Germany? Answer: To keep the Russians in Czech" relies on the aural ambiguity of the homophones check and Czech. Often, puns are not strictly homophonic, but play on words of similar, not identical, sound as in the example from the Pinky and the Brain cartoon film series: "I think so, Brain, but if we give peas a chance, won't the lima beans feel left out?" which plays with the similar—but not identical—sound of peas and peace in the anti-war slogan "Give Peace a Chance".[5]

Homographic

A homographic pun exploits words which are spelled the same (homographs) but possess different meanings and sounds. Because of their origin, they rely on sight more than hearing, contrary to homophonic puns. They are also known as heteronymic puns. Examples in which the punned words typically exist in two different parts of speech often rely on unusual sentence construction, as in the anecdote: "When asked to explain his large number of children, the pig answered simply: 'The wild oats of my sow gave us many piglets.'" An example that combines homophonic and homographic punning is Douglas Adams's line "You can tune a guitar, but you can't tuna fish. Unless of course, you play bass." The phrase uses the homophonic qualities of tune a and tuna, as well as the homographic pun on bass, in which ambiguity is reached through the identical spellings of /beɪs/ (a string instrument), and /bæs/ (a kind of fish). Homographic puns do not necessarily need to follow grammatical rules and often do not make sense when interpreted outside the context of the pun.

Homonymic

Homonymic puns, another common type, arise from the exploitation of words which are both homographs and homophones. The statement "Being in politics is just like playing golf: you are trapped in one bad lie after another" puns on the two meanings of the word lie as "a deliberate untruth" and as "the position in which something rests". An adaptation of a joke repeated by Isaac Asimov gives us "Did you hear about the little moron who strained himself while running into the screen door?" playing on strained as "to give much effort" and "to filter".[6] A homonymic pun may also be polysemic, in which the words must be homonymic and also possess related meanings, a condition that is often subjective. However, lexicographers define polysemes as listed under a single dictionary lemma (a unique numbered meaning) while homonyms are treated in separate lemmata.

Compounded

A compound pun is a statement that contains two or more puns. In this case, the wordplay cannot go into effect by utilizing the separate words or phrases of the puns that make up the entire statement. For example, a complex statement by Richard Whately includes four puns: "Why can a man never starve in the Great Desert? Because he can eat the sand which is there. But what brought the sandwiches there? Why, Noah sent Ham, and his descendants mustered and bred."[7] This pun uses sand which is there/sandwiches there, Ham/ham, mustered/mustard, and bred/bread. Similarly, the phrase "piano is not my forte" links two meanings of the words forte and piano, one for the dynamic markings in music and the second for the literal meaning of the sentence, as well as alluding to "pianoforte", the older name of the instrument. Compound puns may also combine two phrases that share a word. For example, "Where do mathematicians go on weekends? To a Möbius strip club!" puns on the terms Möbius strip and strip club.

Recursive

A recursive pun is one in which the second aspect of a pun relies on the understanding of an element in the first. For example, the statement "π is only half a pie." (π radians is 180 degrees, or half a circle, and a pie is a complete circle). Another example is "Infinity is not in finity", which means infinity is not in finite range. Another example is "a Freudian slip is when you say one thing but mean your mother."[8] The recursive pun "Immanuel doesn't pun, he Kant", is attributed to Oscar Wilde.[9]

Visual

Image
148th Fighter Squadron emblem, a visual pun in which the squadron's motto, "Kickin' Ass" is depicted literally as an ass (can also mean bottom) in the act of kicking.

Visual puns are sometimes used in logos, emblems, insignia, and other graphic symbols, in which one or more of the pun aspects is replaced by a picture. In European heraldry, this technique is called canting arms. Visual and other puns and word games are also common in Dutch gable stones as well as in some cartoons, such as Lost Consonants and The Far Side. Another type of visual pun exists in languages which use non-phonetic writing. For example, in Chinese, a pun may be based on a similarity in shape of the written character, despite a complete lack of phonetic similarity in the words punned upon.[10] Mark Elvin describes how this "peculiarly Chinese form of visual punning involved comparing written characters to objects."[11]

Other

Richard J. Alexander notes two additional forms which puns may take: graphological (sometimes called visual) puns, such as concrete poetry; and morphological puns, such as portmanteaux.[12]

Use

Comedy and jokes


Puns are a common source of humour in jokes and comedy shows. They are often used in the punch line of a joke, where they typically give a humorous meaning to a rather perplexing story. These are also known as feghoots. The following example comes from the movie Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, though the punchline stems from far older Vaudeville roots.[13] The final line puns on the stock phrase "the lesser of two evils".

Captain Aubrey, played by Russell Crowe: "Do you see those two weevils, Doctor?...Which would you choose?"

Dr. Maturin: "Neither. There's not a scrap of difference between them. They're the same species of Curculio."

Captain Aubrey: "If you had to choose. If you were forced to make a choice. If there were no other option."

Dr. Maturin: "Well, then, if you're going to push me. I would choose the right-hand weevil. It has significant advantage in both length and breadth."

Captain Aubrey: "There, I have you!...Do you not know that in the Service, one must always choose the lesser of the two weevils.


Not infrequently, puns are used in the titles of comedic parodies[citation needed]. A parody of a popular song, movie, etc., may be given a title that hints at the title of the work being parodied, replacing some of the words with ones that sound or look similar. For example, collegiate a cappella groups are often named after musical puns to attract fans through attempts at humor[citation needed]. Such a title can immediately communicate both that what follows is a parody and also which work is about to be parodied, making any further "setup" (introductory explanation) unnecessary.

2014 saw the inaugural UK Pun Championships, at the Leicester Comedy Festival, hosted by Lee Nelson. The winner was Darren Walsh. The competition included the line "My computer's got a Miley Virus. It's stopped twerking."[14] Walsh went on to take part in the O. Henry Pun-Off World Championships in Austin, Texas.[15] In 2015 the UK Pun Champion was Leo Kearse.[16]

Books never written

See also: Aptronym

Sometimes called "books never written" or "world's greatest books", these are jokes which consist of fictitious book titles with authors' names that contain a pun relating to the title.[17] Perhaps the best-known example is: "Tragedy on the Cliff by Eileen Dover", which according to one source was devised by humourist Peter DeVries.[18] It is common for these puns to refer to taboo subject matter, such as "What Boys Love by E. Norma Stitts".[17]

Literature

Non-humorous puns were and are a standard poetic device in English literature. Puns and other forms of wordplay have been used by many famous writers, such as Alexander Pope,[19] James Joyce,[20] Vladimir Nabokov,[21] Robert Bloch,[22] Lewis Carroll,[23] John Donne,[24] and William Shakespeare, who is estimated to have used over 3,000 puns in his plays.[25]

Here is an example from Shakespeare's Richard III:

"Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of York" (Son/sun)


Shakespeare was also noted for his frequent play with less serious puns, the "quibbles" of the sort that made Samuel Johnson complain, "A quibble is to Shakespeare what luminous vapours are to the traveller! He follows it to all adventures; it is sure to lead him out of his way, sure to engulf him in the mire. It has some malignant power over his mind, and its fascinations are irresistible."[26] Elsewhere, Johnson disparagingly referred to punning as the lowest form of humour.[27]

In the poem A Hymn to God the Father, John Donne, married to Anne More, reportedly puns repeatedly: "Son/sun" in the second quoted line, and two compound puns on "Donne/done" and "More/more". All three are homophonic, with the puns on "more" being both homographic and capitonymic. The ambiguities serve to introduce several possible meanings into the verses.

"When Thou hast done, Thou hast not done / For I have more.
that at my death Thy Son / Shall shine as he shines now, and heretofore
And having done that, Thou hast done; / I fear no more."


Alfred Hitchcock stated, "Puns are the highest form of literature."[28]

Rhetoric

Puns can function as a rhetorical device, where the pun serves as a persuasive instrument for an author or speaker. Although puns are sometimes perceived as trite or silly, if used responsibly a pun "…can be an effective communication tool in a variety of situations and forms".[29] A major difficulty in using puns in this manner is that the meaning of a pun can be interpreted very differently according to the audience's background and can significantly subtract from a message.[30]

Design

Like other forms of wordplay, paronomasia is occasionally used for its attention-getting or mnemonic qualities, making it common in titles and the names of places, characters, and organizations, and in advertising and slogans.[31][32]

Many restaurant and shop names use puns: Cane & Able mobility healthcare, Sam & Ella's Chicken Palace, Tiecoon tie shop, Planet of the Grapes wine and spirits,[33] Curl Up and Dye hair salon, as do books such as Pies and Prejudice, comics (YU+ME: dream) and films (Good Will Hunting). The Japanese anime Speed Racer's original title, Mach GoGoGo! refers to the English word itself, the Japanese word for five (the Mach Five's car number), and the name of the show's main character, Go Mifune. This is also an example of a multilingual pun, full understanding of which requires knowledge of more than one language on the part of the listener.

Names of fictional characters also often carry puns, such as Ash Ketchum and Goku ("Kakarrot"), the protagonists of the anime series based on the video game series Pokémon and the manga series Dragon Ball, respectively, both franchises which are known for including second meanings in the names of many of their characters. A recurring motif in the Austin Powers films repeatedly puns on names which suggest male genitalia. In the science fiction television series Star Trek, "B-4" is used as the name of one of four androids models constructed "before" the android Data, a main character. And a librarian in another Star Trek episode was named 'Mr. Atoz' (A to Z).

The parallel sequel The Lion King 1½ advertised with the phrase "You haven't seen the 1/2 of it!". Wyborowa Vodka employed the slogan "Enjoyed for centuries straight", while Northern Telecom used "Technology the world calls on."[31]

On 1 June 2015 the BBC Radio 4 You and Yours included a feature on "Puntastic Shop Titles". Entries included a Chinese Takeaway in Ayr town centre called "Ayr's Wok", a kebab shop in Ireland called "Abra Kebabra" and a tree-surgeon in Dudley called "Special Branch". The winning competition entry, selected by Lee Nelson, was a dry cleaner's in Fulham and Chelsea called "Starchy and Starchy".[34]

Heraldry

See also: Canting arms

Visual puns on the bearer's name are used extensively as forms of heraldic expression, they are called canting arms. They have been used for centuries across Europe and have even been used recently by members of the British Royal Family, such as on the arms of Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother and of Princess Beatrice of York. The arms of U.S. Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Dwight D. Eisenhower are also canting.

In the media

Paronomasia has found a strong foothold in the media. William Safire of the New York Times suggests that "the root of this pace-growing [use of paronomasia] is often a headline-writer's need for quick catchiness, and has resulted in a new tolerance for a long-despised form of humor."[35] It can be argued that paronomasia is common in the media, especially headlines, to draw the reader's interest. The rhetoric is important because it connects people with the topic. A notable example is the New York Post headline "Headless Body in Topless Bar." [36]

Paronomasia is prevalent orally as well. Salvatore Attardo believes that puns are verbal humor. He talks about Pepicello and Weisberg's linguistic theory of humor and believes the only form of linguistic humor is limited to puns.[37] This is because a pun is a play on the word itself. Attardo believes that only puns are able to maintain humor and this humor has significance. It is able to help soften a situation and make it less serious, it can help make something more memorable, and using a pun can make the speaker seem witty.

Paronomasia is strong in print media and oral conversation so it can be assumed that paronomasia is strong in broadcast media as well. Examples of paronomasia in media are sound bites. They could be memorable because of the humor and rhetoric associated with paronomasia, thus making the significance of the sound bite stronger.

Confusion and alternative uses

There exist subtle differences between paronomasia and other literary techniques, such as the double entendre. While puns are often simple wordplay for comedic or rhetorical effect, a double entendre alludes to a second meaning which is not contained within the statement or phrase itself, often one which purposefully disguises the second meaning. As both exploit the use of intentional double meanings, puns can sometimes be double entendres, and vice versa. Puns also bear similarities with paraprosdokian, syllepsis, and eggcorns. In addition, homographic puns are sometimes compared to the stylistic device antanaclasis, and homophonic puns to polyptoton. Puns can be used as a type of mnemonic device to enhance comprehension in an educational setting. Used discreetly, puns can effectively reinforce content and aid in the retention of material. Some linguists have encouraged the creation of neologisms to decrease the instances of confusion caused by puns.[38]

History

Puns were found in ancient Egypt, where they were heavily used in the development of myths and interpretation of dreams.[39]

In China, Shen Dao (ca. 300 BC) used "shi", meaning "power", and "shi", meaning "position" to say that a king has power because of his position as king.[40]

In ancient Mesopotamia, about 2500 BC, punning was used by scribes to represent words in cuneiform.[41]

The Hebrew Bible contains puns.[42]

The Maya are known for having used puns in their hieroglyphic writing, and for using them in their modern languages.[43]

In Japan, "graphomania" was one type of pun.[44]

In Tamil, "Sledai" is the word used to mean pun in which a word with two different meanings. This is also classified as a poetry style in ancient Tamil literature. Similarly, in Telugu language, "Slesha" is the equivalent word and is one of several poetry styles in Telugu literature.

See also

• Aesopian language
• Albur
• Alliteration
• Auto-antonym
• Dad joke
• Dajare
• False etymology
• Mondegreen
• Phono-semantic matching
• Satiric misspelling
• Spoonerism
• Tom Swifty

Notes

1. John Pollack (14 April 2011). The Pun Also Rises. Penguin Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-101-51386-6.
2. M. Fontaine, Funny Words in Plautine Comedy, Oxford, 2010.
3. "English Grammar Lesson – How very pun-ny of you! – ELC". ELC – English Language Center. 2 August 2016. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
4. Puns, Blackwell, London, 1984
5. See the citation on Wikiquote
6. Asimov, Isaac. Isaac Asimov's Treasury of Humor, p. 175, § 252. 1971. Houghton Mifflin. New York.
7. Tartakovsky, Joseph (28 March 2009). "Pun for the Ages". The New York Times.
8. "PUNS". Tnellen.com. Retrieved 20 December 2011.
9. Pollack, John (2012). The Pun Also Rises: How the Humble Pun Revolutionized Language, Changed History, and Made Wordplay More Than Some Antics (Reprint ed.). Avery. p. xxiii. ISBN 978-1592406753.
10. Attardo, Salvatore. Linguistic Theories of Humor, p.109. Walter de Gruyter, 1994. Alleton, V. : L'écriture chinoise. Paris, 1970.
11. Mark Elvin "The Spectrum of Accessibility : Types of Humor in The Destinies of the Flowers in the Mirror", p. 113. In :- Roger T. Ames (et al.) : Interpreting Culture through Translation: a Festschrift for D. C. Lau. 1991. pp. 101–118.
12. Alexander, Richard J. Aspects of Verbal Humour in English, pp.21–41
13. Levitt, Paul M. (2002). Vaudeville Humor: The Collected Jokes, Routines, and Skits of Ed Lowry. Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 978-0-8093-2720-1.
14. Mercury, Leicester (14 February 2014). "Comedy Festival Review: The UK Pun Championships at Just The Tonic". Leicester Mercury. Archived from the original on 29 August 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
15. "Dave's Leicester Comedy Festival". Comedy-festival.co.uk. 9 January 2015. Retrieved 1 June2015.
16. "Leo Kearse". Leo Kearse. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
17. Partington, Alan (2006). The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Routledge. p. 127. ISBN 978-0-41538166-6.
18. Booth, David (1990). Writers on Writing: Guide to Writing and Illustrating Children's Books. Grolier Limited. p. 83. ISBN 978-0717223930.
19. Nichol, Donald W, ed. (30 November 2015). Anniversary Essays on Alexander Pope's 'The Rape of the Lock'. University of Toronto Press. pp. 21, 41, 81, 102, 136, 141, 245. ISBN 9781442647961. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 13 August2016.
20. Menand, Louis (2 July 2012). "Silence, Exile, Punning: James Joyce's chance encounters". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 31 October 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
21. Hitchens, Christopher (1 December 2005). "Hurricane Lolita". The Atlantic. Retrieved 13 August2016.
22. Zinna, Eduardo (2013). "Yours Truly, Robert Bloch". Casebook.org. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
23. Appleton, Andrea (23 July 2015). "The Mad Challenge of Translating "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"". Smithsonian. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
24. Kaveney, Roz (2 July 2012). "John Donne, priest and poet, part 7: puns in defiance of reason". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2 May 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
25. Colbyry, Thomas. "Examples of Puns in Shakespeare's Writings". Entertainment Guide. Demand Media. Archived from the original on 2 September 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
26. Samuel Johnson, Preface to Shakespeare.
27. Rogers, Bruce (1999). You Can Say That Again!. Dundurn. p. 95. ISBN 9781554880386.
28. The Dick Cavett Show (Television production). United States: American Broadcasting Company. Event occurs at 8 June 1972.
29. Junker, Dave (February 2013). "In Defense of Puns: How to Use them Effectively". Public Relations Tactics. 20 (2): 18.
30. Djafarova, Elmira (June 2008). "Why Do Advertisers Use Puns? A Linguistic Perspective". Journal of Advertising Research. 48 (2): 267–275. doi:10.2501/s0021849908080306. S2CID 167457581.
31. "The Art and Science of the Advertising Slogan". Adslogans.co.uk. Retrieved 20 December2011.
32. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2011. Retrieved 1 May2010.
33. Collins, Michelle (6 June 2008). "The 50 Best Pun Stores". BestWeekEver.tv. Retrieved 2 December 2012.
34. "Financial Abuse, Ikea Complaints, Damart Marketing, You and Yours". BBC Radio 4.
35. Safire, W. (1980). "On Language: A Barrel of Puns". New York Times. p. SM2.
36. Vincent, Musetto. "Vincent Musetto, 74, dies". The New York Times. Retrieved 27 August 2015.
37. Attardo S. "Puns, Relevance and Appreciation in Advertisements." Journal of Pragmatics 37.5 (2005): 707-21.
38. Shakespeare Survey – Volume 23 – Page 19, Kenneth Muir – 2002
39. Magic in ancient Egypt by Geraldine Pinch University of Texas Press, 1995, 191 pages page 68
40. Three ways of thought in ancient China by Arthur Waley Stanford University Press, 1982 – 216 pages, page 81
41. Mathematics in ancient Iraq: a social history Eleanor Robson, Princeton University Press, 2008, 441 pages, page 31
42. Whedbee, J. William (28 May 1998). The Bible and the Comic Vision. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521495073. Retrieved 7 February 2018 – via Google Books.
43. New theories on the ancient Maya Elin C. Danien, Robert J. Sharer, University of Pennsylvania. University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, UPenn Museum of Archaeology, 1992 – 245 pages, page 99
44. The Cambridge History of Japan: Ancient Japan Delmer M. Brown, John Whitney Hall, Cambridge University Press, 1993 – 650 pages page 463

References

• Alexander, Richard J. (1997). Aspects of Verbal Humour in English. Narr, Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. ISBN 978-3-823-34936-5.
• Augarde, Tony (1984). The Oxford Guide to Word Games. London: Oxford University Press.
• Fontaine, Michael (2010). Funny Words in Plautine Comedy. Oxford University Press.
• Hempelmann, Christian F. (September 2004). "Script opposition and logical mechanism in punning". Humor: International Journal of Humor Research. 17 (4): 381–392. doi:10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.381. S2CID 144409644. (access restricted)
• Smyth, Herbert Weir (1920). Greek Grammar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Tartakovsky, Joseph (28 March 2009). "Pun for the Ages". The New York Times.

Further reading

• Pollack, John (2011). The Pun Also Rises: How the Humble Pun Revolutionized Language, Changed History, and Made Wordplay More Than Some Antics. Penguin. ISBN 978-1-101-51386-6.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Puns.

• There's a Sewer in the Sewer: A Primer for Heteronymphiles
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36119
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am


Return to Reconciliation of Opposites

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest