Part 3 of 5
Can I please go ahead
and as I said before to any victims we ask them to come forward to our
office and we want to work with them. I have never not worked with a victim and I believe I've actually spoken to
several of them. Madam if I can reclaim my time me I can reclaim my time. I just think we
start out by making sure those redactions are unredacted. those Epstein files to make sure that
the public, according to the law, following the law, that those names in
those files are made public. We have to make sure we tell those predators there is no place for them to hide and if they
commit the crime, they're going to fry for it. It starts with showing us the names of the perpetrators in the Epstein
files. May I respond to that? Sure. Okay. So if any man's name was redacted
that should not have been, we will of course unredact it. If a victim's name
was unredacted, please bring it to us and we will redact it. We were given 30
days to review and redact and unredact
millions of pages of documents. Our error rate is very low. The victims are
right behind you. We've got to convince them that we're doing a good job. Everything we can protect victims. We
will do everything we can. Out of time. Gentleman yields back. The gentleman from California, Mr. Kylie, is
recognized. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh good morning, Madam Attorney General. I wanted to return to a point uh that the chairman
raised at the beginning of this hearing uh which is these jurisdictions uh that refuse to offer to honor detainer
requests from immigr immigration and customs enforcement often called sanctuary uh jurisdictions. Uh now I
know that you are not involved directly in immigration operations per se but you do deal with the legal issues uh
surrounding these jurisdictions. So let's say we have someone who's here illegally uh who has committed a crime
that like the thousands of people you mentioned in California, murderers, sexual predators, uh drug traffickers.
if that individual is uh in detention in a jurisdiction that has a sanctuary policy where they do not honor ICE
detainers versus uh in a any other jurisdiction where they do. How does the
nature of uh apprehending that person? How does the nature of ISIS's involvement in that operation differ in
those two circumstances? Well, I believe you've seen that in Minnesota where um where people were not
cooperating with us. I believe there a lot of local law enforcement did want to cooperate, but we are doing everything
in our power to arrest and deport illegal criminal aliens. And that is not
going to stop under Donald Trump's administration. You know why sanities
are so dangerous? What we've seen in Minneapolis, where do all the criminals go? The crim the gangs, TDA, MS13, where
are they going to go? they're going to go to a sanctuary jurisdiction because they believe they're protected and that's not fair to the citizens of those
cities. Yeah. And this is a point that there at least used to be a lot of consensus on uh the idea that you know it's better to
do uh a handoff to the immigration authorities in a custodial setting rather than releasing them where they
have to be apprehended in the community. This is Alejandra Morcus when he was before this committee. Uh not exactly a
paragon of uh border security. Uh but he said, "I do not consider it in the service of public safety to release an
individual into the community when that individual can be released to immigration and customs enforcement for
prompt removal." Now, his words are one thing. His actions are another. Uh but when you have jurisdictions across the
country, including my state of California, doing systematically precisely the thing that even Alejandra
Mayorca said threatens public safety, I mean, what does that say to you?
It's a danger to the citizens of your community. and thank you for fighting to protect them.
Absolutely. And you know, we're having this conversation right now in relation to homeland security funding. And I believe there are some common sense
reforms that have been proposed that folks on both sides uh would agree makes sense. But those reforms have to go hand
inand with reforming this reckless practice of refusing to cooperate,
refusing to honor detainers, and declaring oneself to be a sanctuary. So, I'm hoping that we can find bipartisan
support for what has long been a bipartisan principle. uh want to go to a second topic which is the school board
uh memo uh which uh I know that you have uh rescended and uh it was initially uh
promulgated by attorney general uh Garland when uh he came into office with
President Biden uh essentially opening an investigation into parents who were showing up at schoolboard meetings and
uh and expressing their views on COVID policies, mass various other uh issues
uh and using the full apparatus of federal law enforcement and counterterrorism uh to go after these
parents. Now, he said this was because there was an increase of threats, but when uh even his own FBI director,
Christopher Ray, was before this committee, he said there was no evidence of an increase in threats. Yet, nevertheless, when I asked him if he
regretted the memo, uh Attorney General Garland said there was absolutely nothing wrong with the memo. Now, I take
it you disagree with that, having now rescended it. Absolutely. That was One of the main
focuses of President Trump and this administration, we will protect parents at school boards. We will protect
children in schools. We will protect parents rights for their children's education in our school system in this
country. We will protect Christians. We will protect everyone who wants to
freely protest. If Christians want to protest in front of an abortion clinic without being arrested, they will do so.
Thank you very much. And uh and finally uh I thank you for your efforts to step up uh the detection and rooting out of
fraud. Uh my home state is California. Any idea if there might be any fraud going on in California?
Well, we are establishing as you have heard um a fraud unit and I'm sorry you're having to deal with that in your
state, but the Calvary is coming and we have Colin McDonald who is hopefully will be confirmed soon. We're working on
Minneapolis. I don't know if you were sitting here when I said that, but California was um was right up there.
I'm sorry to say for both sides of the aisle that California is right up there with fraud. It's it's out of control,
but we are coming to your rescue. Donald Trump is coming to the rescue. Well, thank you very much. And unfortunately, I think you'll find that
what's happening in California pales in comparison to what's been going on in Minnesota. Uh thank you. I yield back. Gentleman yields back. The gentleman
from Maryland's recognized. Um actually, I think the gentle lady from Pennsylvania from Pennsylvania is
recognized. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Miss Bondi, I'm here. On September 25th, President Trump
signed a memorandum known as NSPM7 purporting to address domestic
terrorism. But Americans across the political spectrum were immediately alarmed by the memo's blurring of the
line between unlawful conduct and constitutionally protected speech and
activity as well as its call to investigate, prosecute, and dismantle
groups that the president and Steven Miller described without evidence as
quote an organized campaign of radical left terrorism. Now, counterterrorism
experts were further alarmed by the administration's singular focus on left-wing extremism, combined with the
sudden deletion from the DOJ website of decades of research and law enforcement
analysis, which had concluded that right-wing extremism possesses poses the
greatest terrorism threat to Americans. The president's memo broadly and vaguely
links violent conduct to ideologies and it targeted specifically anti-American,
anti-Christian, and anti- capitalist beliefs as well as quote hostility to
so-called traditional American views on family religion and morality end quote.
President Trump has repeatedly and openly, however falsely, tried to brand his political opponents with these
sentiments listed in his memo. But as you know as a lawyer, holding beliefs
that the White House disagrees with is not a crime. And the statute defining
domestic terrorism requires criminal acts, not just thoughts and ideas. That's why legal experts, nonprofit
leaders, religious freedom, and civil rights advocates immediately raised the alarm that the new presidential
directive was a politically motivated attack on civil society designed to
silence those who disagree with the administration. So, Miss Bondi, section
three of that memo directed you as attorney general to submit to the
president and Steven Miller a list of groups or entities whose members are engaged in acts that meet the definition
of domestic terrorism. And then on December 4th, you directed the FBI to
work with a variety of law enforcement uh entities to compile a list of groups
and entities engaged in such acts. by January 3rd, 2026, and to update that
report every 30 days thereafter. So, can we assume that you or persons under your
direction at at the Department of Justice have prepared that list of
groups or entities who are designated as domestic terrorist organizations? And I just remind you that's a yes or no
question. Did you I'm not going to answer it yes or no. But what I what I will say is I know
Antifa is part of that. I will I will talk to you about that. Reclaiming my time as 2020 anifa member was arrested
in Minneapolis. Did you I ask a question and don't want an
answer this the answer is yes time belongs to the gentle lady from Pennsylvania gentle lady can proceed. Okay. So,
will you commit to providing this committee with any list of organizations
that you have recommended be designated as domestic terrorist organizations?
We will comply with the law in all matters. Will you commit to provide this
committee with your list of um entities that you recommend be um designated as
domestic terrorist organizations? I'm not going to commit to anything to
you because you won't let me answer questions. Okay. Well, then we do understand that your current position is that you have a
secret list of people or groups that you are accusing of domestic terrorism, but
you won't share it with Congress. And I'd remind you that when the US government designates an entity as a
foreign terrorist organization, it must report that to Congress and to the entity because
the government can make a mistake and the entity has the opportunity to contest it. So your position seems to be
that if you falsely designate an American or an American organization as a terrorist group, there's nothing they
can do about it. I think we get it. You don't want to answer the question.
No, you don't get anything regarding public safety. Thank you. Nothing. Thank you for the insult. It's clear you
didn't come to Congress prepared to answer questions that the American people have every right to have
answered. But if you were to prepared to answer truthfully, here's what we expect the facts to show. The administration is
keeping lists of Americans who the White House says are engaged in domestic terrorism. Those lists could include
Americans who have not committed any acts of terrorism but simply degree disagree with this administration,
people like Renee Good and Alex Prey. And your list may include clergy,
elected officials, and members of um indivisible groups across the country. And those lists likely don't include
Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually convicted. Americans have never
tolerated political demagogues who use the government to punish people on an enemy's list. It brought down McCarthy
brought down Nixon will bring down this administration as well. You're right back. That's why we're so
glad they rescended the memorandum targeting parents. for goodness sake, as the gentleman from
California just pointed out in his five minutes. The gentleman from Kentucky is recognized.
May I respond very briefly to her statement? Well, I think we can do that probably on
uh one of our one of our members. Okay. Thank you. I don't want that to get away. Thank you. Y thank you, Mr. Chairman. Behind me, I
have three documents from the DOJ production that are emblematic of the massive failure of the DOJ to comply
with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. To my right is an email that was sent by
the victim's lawyers to the DOJ. It was a list of names not to redact or sorry,
a list of names not to release. What did the DOJ do with this email? They
released this email in the document production. Literally the worst thing
you could do to the survivors, you did. And they're getting phone calls. A lot
of these people didn't want to be known. And we know you touched the document
because you redacted one name and you redacted the lawyer's name, but you left the survivor's name there. The next
document I want to show you in that was in the title, the victim's survivors
names. All right, the title of this one is child sex trafficking co-conspirators
fully redacted. And by the way, going to unredact them
here. Les Wexner is in this now. Your assistant de your deputy attorney
general said, "Oh, well, he appears hundreds of times in the files, but he
doesn't appear in this file until I forced you to release it." Where he's listed as a co-conspirator,
not to tax evasion, but to child sex trafficking, not to prostitution, not to
moneyaundering, child sex trafficking. And then finally, what we have here is
the third exhibit that I have is emblematic of the FD302 release. These
are the documents that we need that you're holding on to and overredacting because they have the names of the men
who are implicated. How do we know? Because the the survivors gave testimony
to the FBI and it's in there. And what happens when you go to the portal at the
DOJ to look at what's behind this redaction? Another redaction. So, we
can't even see them. And then there's some of these files you've pulled down from the website that we will never see
because we can't search the redactions. So, I have several questions for you.
Who's responsible? Are you able to track who in your organization made this
massive failure and released the victim's names? Are you able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner's
name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document? Do you have that kind of
accountability? I believe Wexner's name was listed more
than 4,000 times about I had Yeah, I already told you that. This is where he's listed as a
finish my answer. Come on, let me finish my answer. We corrected that within 40
minutes. He was already You're acting like everybody's trying to cover up Wexner's name. Reclaiming Reclaiming my
time. I'm gonna answer this question. Reclaiming my time. Mr. Chairman, this is how this works. Can I have my time?
He was He was Mr. Chairman. The gentle lady can can give her answer. The time belongs to the gentleman from
All right. I'm reclaiming my time. Can I give my answer? So, I'm going to put the language of the bill up on the screen.
Chairman on that political joke and I need to give my answer on that. Let we'll let
the we'll let the attorney general respond and then the gentleman can move to question. It's my turn. Within 40 minutes, you asked me a
question. Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was added back. Within 40 minutes of me catching you
red-handed. Red hand. There was one redaction out
and we invited you in. We This guy has Trump derangement syndrome. He needs to
get You're a failed politician. I want you to watch the chairman. Please restore his time and remind the witness
of there is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the
case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. Is that your position as well?
My position is any victim who comes forward, of course, we would love to
hear from them. 1800 call FBI. Did you ask Merritt Garland that the last four
years? Did you talk about Epstein? I am reclaiming my time. I'm glad you're asking about Mary Garland. This is
bigger than Watergate when I don't answer question. This goes over four administrations. You
don't have to go back to Biden. Let's go back to Obama. Let's go back to George Bush. This cover up spans decades and
you are responsible for this portion of it. And that's where I want to know at
what point at what point did the FBI and the DOJ decide that Lex
Westerner was not a co-conspirator? Because our Epstein Files Transparency
Act requires you please put it back on the screen. He's to release the internal decision
about whether to prosecute him or not. And it's not in the files. And it's not in the files for any of these other men.
time of the gentleman has. May she answer and he's a hypocrite because he voted
against the ban that we were talking about on deep fake AI porn. Only two
people voted against it and you were one of them, hypocrite. The uh the gentleman's time has expired.
The She didn't answer the question. Mr. Chairman, I Mr. Chairman, could she answer the question? Chairman, I was wondering
the gentle lady's allowed the attorney general is allowed to respond the way she wants to respond to any member's questions. Republican, Democrat.
All right. I have unanimous consent request. Gentleman's recognized for a UC. All right. This is an example. I'm I'm
submitting these 302 forms that are entirely redacted. Even when you go to look at them.
Without objection. I'm submitting a witness statement that implicates Les Wexner.
Without objection. I'm submitting an article from the New York Times. The DOJ released nude photos
and identifiable pictures of the victims. I'm submitting a letter from AG Bondi to
Cash Patel imploring him to quit keeping the files
when you found out that they were keeping files from you because they're still redacting files
that you chairman. Are we going to recess for votes? Yes, we are. I'm submitting for unanimous consent a
document of 17 individuals who've resigned because of the Epstein files. Without objection.
Just want to check on what time what time uh how much time we have left in votes. But one thing I've learned here of late that they'll wait on this. Uh
how much time do we have? Oh, they just called. Okay. Uh the chair
now recognizes the gentleman from Maryland. And thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, I want to start by saying I appreciate what you
said, Attorney General Bondi, and you've said it to me personally, uh, that you take the personal security of every
member of Congress seriously and that people can contact you about that. And in these times, that's a very serious
matter. So, I thank you for that. Um, article 2, section 1, clause 7 of the
constitution is the domestic emalance clause. And it says that the president
is limited to his salary in office and cannot receive any other money from the
federal government while he's in office. It cannot be increased by $1. This
president is the first president in US history who has repeatedly sued the federal government, sued the federal
government for $230 million uh for the judicial search warrant at Mara Lago,
which was perfectly lawful and was never struck down. But now he's suing the IRS for10 billion dollar. He's suing the IRS
for $10 billion, which I think is around 80% of its annual budget. Um because his
tax returns were leaked and they were illegally leaked by a private contractor who actually is in prison now, Charles
Little John. But he wants $10 billion. Now, um, well, I I want to I want to ask
you the question of whether you think it would violate the domestic emolments clause for you to settle that $10
billion case or any of the other, uh, claims that the president's made against the government. He himself has remarked,
uh, it's interesting because I'm the one that makes the deal, right? And he says, I kind of have to work it out with
myself. Do you think it would violate the domestic imalments clause for the president to work out a deal from people
or his subordinates under his unitary executive theory to get money in one of these cases?
I'm not going to discuss pending litigation. Okay. So, theoretically, you're saying
uh because his uh privacy rights were violated uh in that tax case and they
were. I'm with the president on that. I mean, his Mara Lago thing is ridiculous, but there's no doubt that his tax
returns, despite the fact that he promised to release them, despite the fact that every other president released the tax returns, uh, he suffered
embarrassment when it showed that he hadn't paid taxes for several years, and he had a right for that not to happen.
Now, I want to turn back to the Epstein survivors because President Trump may have been a little bit embarrassed by
the release of those uh, tax returns. How much do you think the claims of
these survivors are worth? As um the good congressman from Kentucky just
pointed out, there were lots of survivors who had decided for reasons of
their own never to release their names. That determination was represented to
people in Congress and we built it into our federal law that their names could not be released. And yet you published
their names, their phone numbers, their addresses, personally identifying information. If Donald Trump can get $10
billion theoretically from the Department of Justice, how much should these people get for a far worse
violation of their privacy rights and a far greater danger established to them in their lives?
Do you even know who Chase Mulligan is? You're so obsessed with You don't do you. I'm going to teach you the rules again.
You're the attorney general of the United States. We have rules here with him. You're the attorney general of the United States. Obsessed with Donald Trump. You have
Trump derangement syndrome. Mr. Chairman, I'd like my time restored. I'd like my time restored in your
district in your district and you don't even know about it about keeping children belongs to predators.
Time belongs to the gentleman from Maryland. Gentleman can proceed. Yeah. And I I just I want the whole
country to look at this because this is the attorney general of the United States whose job is law enforcement.
We've never had a witness who has misunderstood our rules and been unable to conform his or her conduct to our
rules before. We have only five minutes and so we use our time to ask you
specific questions. How long are you giving me? Excuse me. I I'm not yielding to you right now. I'd like that second
restored. So, Miss Bondi, the way it works is we ask you a question and you
answer it. And if you go off on a wild goose chase, another tangent, you start reading statistics or you start talking
about stuff going on our district. And by the way, I invite you to my district. Come to my district. But that's not what we're here to do today. Okay? So, and
you do that, then we're allowed to say we reclaim our time. At that point, you have to be quiet. You have no choice.
You have to be quiet. So, I hope you understand the rule of this point. Now, here's what I want to ask you.
You're in law enforcement. We've seen all kinds of evidence of crimes. And when we go over to the Department of
Justice for the four computers for every member of Congress, we see more evidence of crimes. Will you create a joint task
force of the Department of Justice and governors and state attorney generals and district attorneys across the
country to investigate the crimes that have taken place against these victims and more than a thousand like them. The
DOJ is not doing its job. Will you create a task force with state and local law enforcement to make that happen?
Gentle lady can respond. She wants to. Thank you, chairman. He called Chase
Mulligan a wild goose chase and didn't even know who he was. He is a defendant in your own district who prayed on
girls. Mr. Chairman, well, you know what? If he were part of the Epste investigation, you wouldn't do anything about it. online chat rooms and
committed sexion. Yet he didn't even know in your tiny little district who he was. Mr.
Chairman, she's embarrassing you. About to be This is your committee and she is embarrassing me. The time of the gentleman has expired. I
would remind the committee that last Congress, Secretary of Mystics was here numerous times and he wouldn't answer
our questions even when we sent them to him ahead of time in writing. So that's
what we've had to deal with. I think the attorney general is doing just fine. We have votes shortly. I will go to the
gentleman from Virginia and then we will take a a break to head to the floor. I I thank the chairman, Attorney General
Bondi. Thank you for being here and I wanted to thank you for your work at DOJ
in restoring the rule of law. uh encouraging transparency surrounding Jack Smith's partisan investigations
into President Trump, declassifying information about the Russia collusion hoax, um cracking down on sanctuary
jurisdictions, and establishing the National Fraud Enforcement Division. Let me first go to securing the border and
immigration enforcement. Our new governor has recently rescended 287G
cooperation between the state and ICE. Uh can you talk about have you evaluated the public safety impact? How that would
affect um safety in Virginia to withdraw that support and what that would do uh
to activity criminal activity involving illegal immigrants in Virginia?
Yes, it would be detrimental. And and as as you know, Congressman, we one of the top members of MS13 in the entire
country was living in Virginia. Yeah. In a suburb um
among all of us, living not even probably half an hour away from where we are now. and the cooperation
previously um with the governor with the members um
the members of of the state of Virginia helped catch him and take him off our
streets. an illegal MS-13, one of the heads for the entire country was living
in Virginia. And and it's a shame that that's happening now. And and and thank you for bringing it talking about it
because um we're going to keep America safe. And and when people feel like they
can flee to these cities and states and be safe, they can't because Donald Trump
is going to protect Americans. We're going to protect the citizens there whether or not the governors, the mayors
are going to do it or not. But President Trump is we're going to keep Americans safe from violent gang members like he's
been doing this last year. We appreciate that. We appreciate your your work to make that happen in Virginia and keep Virginia safe. Uh I
want to move on to the fraud enforcement division that you've established. Uh my understanding is that this initiative is
intended to centralize coordinate enforcement of fraud laws related to government programs. You've talked about Minnesota, you've talked about
California. Would this affect Virginia as well? Because we have fraud in Virginia as well.
Absolutely. And we um look forward to working with you. Would this affect things like um
long-term care accountability, senior living facilities engaged in Medicaid fraud, including systemic overbilling
practices, and the misappropriation of taxpayer funded benefits. That is exactly what it's set up to help.
Okay. I know that uh whether it was related to fraud specifically or another
subject that under the Biden administration there was um a sitting
member of the Virginia General Assembly under investigation. Is that investigation still ongoing?
Can you speak to that? I can't discuss that. Okay. I'm going to move on to
uh the Second Amendment rights of law- abiding Americans. Uh last year,
President Trump signed the one big beautiful bill into law which uh included the Hearing Protection Act,
part of it that was sponsored by myself and and Congressman Clyde. Um it reduced the National Firearms Tax, $200 tax on
suppressors and shortbarreled firearms to zero. And while the tax has been eliminated, uh the NFA's registration
and paperwork requirements were made in effect. and your uh your DOJ has said
that that would even though the tax was reduced to zero um that the registration
requirement is still uh somehow necessary even though with regard to um
Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act when that mandate was uh when that tax
penalty was reduced to zero you decided that the mandate was no longer necessary. How are you How are you
justifying the existence of this registry, Congressman? That's pending um
litigation right now. It is. It is. And I would hope you would reconsider you would reconsider that.
I yield back. Gentlemen, yield. I yield to the chairman. I think I think that uh Attorney General Bondi, why did Jack Smith have to pay
some secret source $20,000 of taxpayer money? Do you know the answer to that?
I can't discuss um anything on that matter, but that's a good question. Chairman Jordan,
a good well said it's a good question because he subpoenaed just about every Republican in this town. Got half the
Congress's phone numbers if you were a Republican. He has to pay some secret source a bunch
of taxpayer money. We'd like to know the committee like to know how many other sources he paid. Was it more than
$20,000? Why he had to do those thing? We'd like to know when you can if you could get that information to the
committee. I think when you think about the guy who was trying to put the president of the United States in prison,
ridiculous as that whole thing was, we'd kind like to know the answer to that if you could. And with that, we're going to stand in recess. We will go as quickly
as we can and vote. We have two quick votes on the floor. We will be back. There is actually some lunch if you all
need it. We have for our members. And since you're back here, you can have some. We we normally have plenty. Mr. Chairman, we'll take a recess. Before we before
you gave out, can I ask for unanimous consent to enter to a record the article entitled uh inside Trump's DOJ dated
October 16th, 2020? Without objection, we stand in recess.
And the gentleman from uh Colorado is recognized for five minutes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. here.
Attorney General Bondi, six days ago, you posted online, quote, "If you come
for law enforcement, the Trump administration will come for you." End quote. I want to show you just a brief
video. It's about 30 seconds and I'll ask you a couple questions about disgusting, man. You guys are
disgusting. I'm former I'm former law enforcement. You're disgusting. You are the Nazi. You are the gesturer. You
can't see it because you're chasing pinching, right? pension. You're retirement, right? That's what runs your life, your retirement.
The sad thing is they're not even gonna get their pension because it's gonna be your shame on
Attorney General Bondi, that man works for you now, right?
Who was that, Congressman? The man in that video, the one who was in the police warn body
cam footage, the one allegedly yelling kill him at police officers on January
6th. His name is Jared Weise. He does work for us. He works for you at the Department of Justice.
He does. This is an individual whom a federal grand jury indicted for two felonies and
four misdemeanors related to his participation in the attack on January 6th. One of
those charges was forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, and interfering with police with the intent to commit another
felony. This is who you choose as the chief law enforcement officer of
the United States of America to hire at the Department of Justice. Someone on video
yelling kill him at police officers. Right. I believe he was pardoned by President
Trump. Oh, he was pardoned. You're right. You're right. Pardoned by President
Trump for his offense. Pardoned for yelling kill him at police officers. And
yet you expect hardworking police officers across the country to believe that you take law enforcement seriously.
You could imagine the reaction of so many folks across the country hearing
the chief law enforcement officer of the United States refuse to even condemn what that individual
whom you've now hired did. But in any event, let's talk a
little bit about some of the other divisions within the Department of Justice and what's happened over the last year. You're familiar with the
public integrity section of the DOJ's criminal division. I think it's referred to as PIN. Is that right?
Yes. Okay. Do you know which presidential administration under which the PIN was first created?
I can tell you what administration that the weaponization was ended under. I'll reclaim my time. This wasn't a
trick question. You don't get to reclaim your time. Madam Attorney General, because I don't like Mr. Chairman, will you explain to the witness that that he does reclaim his
time? Because I don't answer a question to your satisfaction, Mr. Chairman. Madam Attorney General, the time belongs to the gentleman from
Colorado. The president under which PIN was created was Gerald Ford. It was created
after Water. I'm not asking a question. Madam Attorney General, the administration under which it was created was Gerald Ford. When you first
started as the attorney general of the United States, there were 35 people working in that office. There are now two people working in that office
because you have gutted it. How many people work for the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team in the
Criminal Division today? Can I answer the question about PEN?
I've asked you a question. How many people asked you a question, but you don't How many people work for the National
Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team? You won't answer. How many? I'll answer PEN. You
will not be actually You know what? What's funny about this? I'll say to the chairman, what's funny about this, chairman? You know what the answer is?
And I think the I understand why does not want to answer the question because you eliminated the national cryptocurrency enforcement team last
year. So I understand why you don't want to tell the American people who works there. No one understand why you don't want to talk about Mohamad Solomon in
your district. In any event, Mr. Chairman, will you stop the clock so his time is not wasted by the witness?
Very generous with allowing extra time when we have these little disputes. I understand you got the time. I might as well ask
the chairman these questions because what is your question? What's profound? The questions I've asked
the crime in your asked, Mr. Chairman, are not trick questions. They're not
gotcha questions. They're actually basic questions about how the Department of Justice functions and the unwillingness
of this attorney general to answer them in good faith. When a member of Congress
asks how many people work at the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team and the attorney general refuses to
answer it, it is not a coincidence. It's because she eliminated the team.
Why? Because her boss, the president of the United States, is making money hand
over fist, $1.4 billion dollars over the course of the last year through cryptocurrency holdings. I think what is
happening at the Department of Justice is a disgrace. Mr. chairman and I would
urge you to gain control of this hearing. With that, I yield back the balance of
my time. Yeah. I I I would ask the gentleman, does he agree with the standing up of
the deputy attorney general for dealing with fraud? That's something that's happened in this administration. First
time you talked about PIN, uh that happened with this justice department. We're talking about this committee. Mr. Chairman, had you answered the
question in had the attorney general answered the question in that way? Perhaps this hearing would have some
modicum of resembling something that has typically been fairly conventional, an
oversight hearing of the Department of Justice. Gentleman's time is expired. The the the gentle lady from Wyoming uh is
recognized for five minutes. Attorney General Bondi, I want to express my gratitude to the president,
you and your team for your continued efforts against extreme anti-energy policies taken by states and cities that
serve only to increase costs on the American people. This is an issue of great concern for Congress as well as
the consumers. At the behest of networks of non-governmental organizations and anti-growth activists, Democratic
controlled states and cities are enacting laws and pursuing coordinated lawsuits that would impose retroactive
liability on energy producers for past global emissions based on speculative
future climate change harms. The proponents of these plans call them climate super fund laws, but in reality
that is simply window dressing for taxes and fees imposed on consumers and businesses that don't even have a a
presence in these states or communities. But if you look at the billions of dollars they hope to gain from these
efforts, the real goal here is to increase their already mismanaged state budgets by imposing fees on consumers
and businesses in energy producing states such as the state of Wyoming. I would describe this as the tobacco
litigation on steroids. Vermont has enacted such a law and another has recently gone into effect in New York.
Similar laws are under consideration in a number of other states. Clearly, this problem is spreading. Would you agree
that Congress has not authorized states to impose retroactive liability against
energy producers and lawful carbon emissions? Yes. And would you also agree that
protecting consumers is a core part of the DOJ's mission? Absolutely. Would you further agree that combating
state policies that seek to hide and shift the true cost of programs like these uh uh onto consumers fits within
your mission? Yes. So, Attorney General Bondi, fossil fuels are the foundation of the US
economy, and the recent winter storms underscored that gas, coal, and oil remain essential to grid reliability and
heating our homes. Can you confirm that the DOJ is fully committed to using all available legal tools to stop these
state and local level attacks on domestic energy production? Congresswoman, we are committed to that
and so is the entire administration. We we talk about that a lot. Thank you. Thank you. The president's
April 2025 executive order directed the DOJ to identify and act against state
laws that burden the burden US energy production. What concrete actions has the DOJ and the administration more
broadly taken to carry out this directive? Well, we filed four lawsuits. We we are
filing multiple lawsuits. Many things are pending within this office to carry that out. Okay. States continue to invent new
causes of action to pursue state climate law fair as is evidenced by Michigan's recent novel claim related to antitrust
violations. The city of Boulder, Colorado has also filed such a lawsuit despite refusing my challenge that they
actually forego the use of fossil fuels if they I disagree with them so much. Does the Department of Justice agree
that these novel approaches require a federal response and will the Department pursue such an approach? Yes,
Congresswoman, and we'd be happy to talk to you more about that. Wonderful. Thank you. Multiple climate
lawsuits, multiple climate lawsuits are now advancing toward trial trial, even in
states that rely on those energy forms to provide heat and electricity for their citizens. In fact, in any
community that they all rely upon fossil fuels in some fashion, is the department
actively considering intervention to protect federal supremacy over interstate emissions and energy policy?
Yes, we'd be happy to discuss that with you. Thank you. And clearly, this is an area in which Congress has a role to play. To
that end, I'm working with my colleagues in both the House and Senate to craft legislation tackling both these state
laws and the lawsuits that could destroy energy affordability for consumers. To that end, are there any authorities or
tools that DOJ and the administration don't currently have at their disposal that would be helpful in that e effort
that Congress could adopt? Well, we work with multiple agencies throughout the administration, but I'd
be happy to talk to you about that more. Wonderful. Thank you. I appreciate your effort in this regard.
And may I have 20 seconds of your time before to address something? Yes. Thank you.
Your colleague um Senator Nagus Nagus um
didn't want to talk about crypto because he said I was a disgrace talking about
crypto because he didn't want to talk about the tremendous crime in his jurisdiction. He voted no on preventing
violence against women by illegal aliens. Yet on June 1st, 2025, Muhammad
Solomon attacked members of the group run for their lives in Boulder, Colorado, where an 82year-old woman
sustained burns on over half of her body and eventually died from her injuries.
I believe that she was a Holocaust survivor. She was by the time the time the gentle lady has
expired the uh gentle lady yields back and the gentle lady from uh Georgia is recognized.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Miss Bondi, as the Florida Attorney General, attorneys from
your office handled the appeal of my son Jordan Davis's murder, which was denied.
As a result of the efforts of those attorneys under your watch, the court actually upheld the life sentence for a
man who used prejudice as his defense for murdering my son and scarring his friends for life.
Attorneys from your office under your management worked hard to remove a
dangerous man from the community who terrorized innocent people like my son
and his friends. The compassion and respect that my family received throughout that ordeal
were critical in helping us keep faith in the rule of law and justice.
Based on my experiences, I have seen how strong victim services,
sustained investigations, and wellsupported prosecutors can make a meaningful difference in the lives of
families who are grieving and suffering. Miss Bondi, just yes or no. Would you
agree that government officials should be respectful and supportive of victims
families as they mourn? First, Congresswoman, thank you for for
talking about that and I'm so very sorry for what happened to your family.
Thank you. And and yes, I agree with that with all victims, including the ones sitting behind us today. I absolutely do. And
also, thank you for voting yes on the Lake and Riley Act. Thank you for that. Thank you. Okay. So, your answer is why
the recent treatment of families in Minnesota raises really serious concerns for me. Because shortly after Mr. Alex
Prey was murdered, administration officials referred to him as an assassin and called Mr. Prey the definition of
domestic terrorism. They also lied about Mr. Prey holding a gun and threatening
officers. After Ms. Renee Good was murdered by ICE officials in Minneapolis. Administration officials
also accused her of being a domestic terrorist and investigated her wife in a
clear act of retaliation. The statement Mr. Py's mother made after the murder
resonated with me more than you'll ever imagine. She said that, and I'm quoting,
"The sickening lies told about our son by the administration are reprehensible
and disgusting." End quote. And I assure you, I know how it feels to hear lies
that are told to justify the taking of someone's son. They were used by my
son's murderer as a defense, and those lies still affect me today. He was
called a thug, and he was called a gang banger. And the attorneys from your office actually defended my son's name,
his memory, and defended his honor. I'm certain that Mr. Py's mother watched
videos of her son, Alex, an ICU nurse at the VA hospital, using his phone to
record federal agents. She also watched him getting pepper sprayed, kicked, hit in the head, and surrounded by at least
seven agents before having his gun removed from his waistband, which he legally carried.
And she watched second lers seconds later as two of those agents shot her son, Alex, at least 10 times. The
administration was quick to spew an incorrect narrative and call him so many things that they wanted us to ignore the
truth that we actually saw with our own eyes. Miss Bondi, will you denounce the
statements that were made to tarnish the names of Alex Prey and Renee Good? And
will you protect their names like those attorneys back in Florida under your
watch protected my son's name?
What I will say is we are looking at everything to shed light on what happened that day and it is an ongoing
and active investigation. Both of those cases and I assure you they will be investigated.
Investigating. We understand that. But will you do everything in your power as you have done for my case as you are
asked to do as you've sworn an oath to do. It is your responsibility to make
sure that you are following the rule of law. Those families in Minnesota res
they deserve the same respect. They deserve a full investigation which you have not even begin to do yet. So what
are you saying is that they don't deserve any respect for a full investigation into their murders.
Well, that is incompetence on your behalf. The American people do deserve
better. non-commmitment to defending the rule of law is what we see from you.
I will always stand up for survivors and I heard you say earlier when you told us that you will fight for them as well.
And based on the information before us, these families have not received the same commitment to investigate what happened to their loved ones. Nor have
they received the respect that I I would expect from the nation's top law enforcement officer. Investigations have
been slowwalked. They've been cancelled. and the special agent assigned to Renee Goods investigation resigned
following pressure from your officials to reclassify Miss V's case of the gentle
family seeking answers and accountability. The withdrawal of investigative resources simply unacceptable
expired. The gentle lady yields back the gentleman from California's rec. Uh thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh madam
attorney general, u I I I get the sense that we've lost a little perspective here. uh the most fundamental
responsibility of government is to protect the lives and property of its citizens. Now, you cited some crime
figures in your opening statement and I wonder if you could repeat them because I think it's one of the most extraordinary achievements of the
Department of Justice in our history and I don't think some of my colleagues heard you clearly.
Thank you, Congressman. And would you mind if I address something that that go Congresswoman Mcbath wouldn't let me
address first? Go right ahead. Uh the the reason that that she wants to continue to talk about
Minnesota, which we will all day long, is she doesn't want to talk about her own jurisdiction in Atlanta, because she
doesn't want to talk about Christopher Welchure who traveled across state lines to try to meet and nothing's funny about
this to meet and molest a 14-year-old girl in Georgia. That's why they're watching the clock. The American people
should know for the second it runs out because they don't want to address anything in their jurisdiction. They're
elected to represent people in their jurisdiction. We prosecuted illegal aliens who ran a largecale meth
operation in the Atlanta metro. You understand we don't prosecute, right, Miss Bundy?
Madam Attorney General, um I'm sorry. So, yes, the statistics I spoke of
earlier, Congressman, um under the leadership of the FB of the FBI,
historic work has been done. um a drop 20% in the na nationwide murder rate in
2025. Least murders in our country since 1900.
And that is to the work because of the credit. It's not just homicides, is it? It's also other violent crimes, robbery.
Could you go through that list real quick? Yes, Congressman. 100%
increase in violent crime arrest in 2025 compared to 2024.
