General Epstein Articles

There is no shorter route to power than through the genitals of male leaders. This principle guided the Lolita Gambit, played by the Mossad through its "Agent" Jeffrey Epstein

Re: General Epstein Articles

Postby admin » Wed Nov 26, 2025 4:59 pm

As Summers Sought Clandestine Relationship With Woman He Called a Mentee, Epstein Was His ‘Wing Man’. When former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers was pursuing a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee, he turned to a longtime associate for guidance: convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein.
by Dhruv T. Patel and Cam N. Srivastava
The Harvard Crimson
November 17, 2025
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025 ... as-mentee/

[x]
Former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers processes into the University's 2018 Commencement ceremony. The former Treasury secretary remained in contact with convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein until the day before Epstein's arrest in 2019. By Amy Y. Li

When former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers was pursuing a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee, he sought guidance from a longtime associate: convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein.

In a sequence of texts and emails between November 2018 and July 5, 2019, Summers turned to Epstein for advice on his pursuit of the woman. Epstein was quick to chime in with assurance and suggestions, describing himself in one November 2018 message as Summers’ “wing man.”

The messages became public after House Republicans released more than 20,000 files from the Epstein estate on Wednesday. Summers’ correspondence with Epstein, a financier who pled guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008, ends just one day before Epstein was arrested on new sex trafficking charges.

Together, the messages show Summers — who served as Treasury Secretary under former United States President Bill Clinton — placing an extraordinary degree of trust in Epstein, asking him for help in navigating a relationship that blurred the boundaries of his professional and personal lives.

Summers, who has been married since 2005, told Epstein he thought the woman was reluctant to leave him because she valued his professional connections. Epstein told him in one June 2019 text, “She is doomed to be with you.”


“Think for now I’m going nowhere with her except economics mentor,” Summers wrote in November 2018. “I think I’m right now in the seen very warmly in rear view mirror category.”

“She must be very confused or maybe wants to cut me off but wants professional connection a lot and so holds to it,” Summers wrote in a March 2019 exchange to Epstein, explaining why he believed she continued to engage with him despite tensions.

A spokesperson for Summers said that the woman described in the exchanges was never Summers’ student, but declined to comment further for this article.

In at least some of his exchanges with Epstein on the relationship, Summers appears to refer to macroeconomist Keyu Jin ’04, a tenured professor at the London School of Economics at the time, who is mentioned in a series of late 2018 messages between the two men.

In one, Summers forwarded Epstein an email from Jin asking for feedback on a paper. Summers mused to Epstein that it was “probably appropriate” to hold off on responding.

“She’s already begining to sound needy :) nice,” Epstein replied.


Jin, who earned her bachelor’s degree and Ph.D. at Harvard between 2000 and 2009, declined to comment on the months of messages between Summers and Epstein. In the messages released by the House, she does not refer to a romantic relationship with Summers. It is not clear whether she was aware that Summers shared her emails or discussed her with Epstein.

Throughout the seven months of correspondence reviewed by The Crimson, Summers and Epstein referred to the woman Summers was pursuing in some messages by the code name “peril” but never used her name in messages directly describing the relationship. On at least two occasions, the two men discussed Jin’s emails to Summers, which he forwarded to Epstein. In later messages, the two men appeared to joke about the probability that Summers would have sex with the woman, apparently Jin.

Summers’ long relationship with Epstein has been well documented, but the depth of their conversations, including over intimate matters, became public only this week. He traveled on Epstein’s private airplane on at least four occasions, including at least three times while serving as president of Harvard. Summers also met more than a dozen times with him and solicited donations from the disgraced financier for his wife, Harvard English professor emerita Elisa New. The messages released Wednesday show Summers organizing visits to Harvard on Epstein’s behalf and discussing contributions for New’s work.

“I have great regrets in my life,” Summers wrote in a Wednesday statement to The Crimson. “As I have said before, my association with Jeffrey Epstein was a major error of judgement.”


The exchanges concerning Jin’s messages and Summers’ relationship began shortly before a November 2018 investigation from the Miami Herald surfaced accusations from 80 girls and women that Epstein had abused them between 2001 and 2006, drawing on court records and interviews. Summers continued to correspond with Epstein about his relationship even after the Department of Justice opened an investigation in February 2019 into Epstein’s 2008 plea deal.

Wednesday’s documents also revealed messages where Summers, whose speculation that innate differences between men and women could drive women’s underrepresentation in science contributed to the end of his Harvard presidency in 2006, joked about women’s intelligence and what he described as excessive penalties for men who “hit on” women in the workplace.


In an October 2017 email to Epstein, Summers retread the same terrain that had proven treacherous for him in the past, writing that he “observed that half the IQ in world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population….”

Summers has continued to teach at Harvard since, interrupted by brief stints in Washington, and currently holds Harvard’s highest faculty distinction as a University Professor. This semester, he is teaching two large undergraduate courses and one graduate class.

The first interactions between Summers and Epstein on his relationship with the woman — apparently Jin — appear in late November and early December 2018, when she and Summers seem to have met during an academic conference. For two days, Summers sent Epstein updates on his interactions with her.

On Dec. 1, Summers wrote that the woman had been “interested in my commentary on her outfits” and said he had “referenced your having figured us out” — suggesting Summers told her that Epstein was aware of their relationship.

Summers described his feelings as conflicted in the messages to Epstein, writing in remarkably candid terms.

“When I’m reflective I think I’m dodging a bullet,” he wrote. “Think right thing is to cut off contact. Suspect she will miss it. Problem is I will too.”

The next morning, Summers struck a different tone: “Game day at conference she was extremely good Smart Assertive and clear Gorgeous. I’m fucked.”

In messages from later that month, Summers and Epstein discussed Summers’ relationship with Jin’s father, a former high-ranked Chinese Communist Party official and the founding president of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, who Summers had long been close with.

When Jin emailed Summers on Dec. 22 to thank him for his support of her and her father — minutes after she sent Summers an outline of an academic paper — Summers forwarded the exchange to Epstein, explaining that he had recently “sent a comment in mtg w her father flattering her father and saying other China officials had flattered him as well.”

Summers continued to detail his interactions with the woman — who appears to be Jin but is not named in the Epstein emails after December 2018 — throughout March 2019, now expressing frustration that she was canceling or shortening plans and appeared to be interested in another man.

“I think she is tired of this alas. Sustaining w secrecy hard,” he wrote.

The final tranche of messages, beginning in mid-June, shows the relationship still unresolved and Summers again turning to Epstein for guidance on how to pursue it. Summers asked Epstein whether it was “meaningful” to discuss the probability of “my getting horizontal w peril,” drawing parallels to forecasting Trump’s reelection.

“U r better at understanding Chinese women than at probability theory,” Summers told Epstein. The two men bantered about probability and mathematics, but repeatedly steered the conversation back to Summers’ relationship.

Epstein joked that “the probability of you in bed again with peril” was “0,” before reversing course and assuring Summers that “she is never ever going to find another Larry summers. Probability ZERO.”

Summers went on to describe what he saw as his “best shot”: that the woman finds him “invaluable and interesting” and concludes “she can’t have it without romance / sex.”

Throughout June, Summers fed Epstein updates about the woman’s workload and continued contact. Epstein urged him to play the “long game” and keep her in what he called a “forced holding pattern.”

The final messages, dated July 5, 2019, show Summers still in regular contact with Epstein. That morning, Summers wrote he was in Cape Cod with his family — “Bit of an Ibsen play,” he joked — and the two men exchanged a brief flurry of literary one-liners.


The thread ends at 1:27 p.m.

Epstein was arrested the next day.

​​—Staff writer Dhruv T. Patel can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on X @dhruvtkpatel.

—Staff writer Cam N. Srivastava can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on X @camsrivastava.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39315
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: General Epstein Articles

Postby admin » Wed Nov 26, 2025 11:27 pm

Inside the FBI’s Review and Redaction of Epstein Files. The communications released to FOIA Files provide a look behind the scenes as agents and other FBI personnel started to work on the Epstein files earlier this year.
by Jason Leopold
Bloomberg
November 25, 2025 at 1:35 PM PST
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newslett ... on-project

Image
Kash Patel, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), during a news conference at the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Nov. 12, 2025. Photographer: Bonnie Cash/UPI

Welcome to a special edition of FOIA Files. This morning, the Federal Bureau of Investigation turned over dozens of emails to me that reveal some details about how FBI agents and personnel from the Freedom of Information Act office reviewed and processed the Epstein files earlier this year. Let’s dive in! If you’re not already getting FOIA Files in your inbox, sign up here.

The legacy of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein continues to hang over national politics. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump signed legislation that required the Justice Department to release the Epstein files. Soon, the public may finally get to see at least some of what the government has in its voluminous cache, which comprises more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence from its criminal probe of the serial sex abuser. Getting to this point has been quite a winding path that started just after Trump took office—and that FOIA Files has been covering.

As I reported in March, after a botched rollout of what Attorney General Pam Bondi described as “Phase 1” of the release of the Epstein files, FBI Director Kash Patel ordered around 1,000 FBI special agents to team up with the bureau’s FOIA personnel at an FBI facility in Winchester, Virginia to prepare the Epstein files for public release.

The army of agents from the New York and Washington field offices, along with FOIA officers, were instructed on how to review and apply redactions to the documents.

Over the summer, I filed a wide-ranging FOIA request for those directives, as well as communications between agency personnel pertaining to their review of the files and the taxpayer dollars spent on the marathon two-month process. I then sued the FBI to compel release of the documents.

Just this morning I got the partially redacted records from the FBI. They mostly consist of emails that provide a look behind the scenes as agents and other FBI personnel started to work on the documents. The bureau withheld more than 161 pages citing ongoing law enforcement proceedings and other FOIA exemptions.

The emails reveal the special training given to FBI personnel working on what it called the “Epstein Transparency Project.” In some instances they referred to it as the “Special Redaction Project.” The training entailed PowerPoint slide presentations and video instruction on how to review the files.


Image
Click here to view the documents (page 11)

From: Parry, Shannon Vh (IMD) (FBI) [DELETE]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 8:21 AM
To: Backschies, Leslie R. (NY) (FBI) [DELETE] Yarbrough, B. Chad (CID) (FBI) [DELETE]
Subject: Fw: Redactions

Leslie/Chad,

Good talking with each of you yesterday. IMD is happy to support.

I wanted to share the below, as we seek guidance from the GC on the types of redactions to apply to these documents so we can process the right way out of the gate.

[DELETE]

Regardless, we are here and we are ready. Looking forward to welcoming NY and WFO to Winchester today.

Shannon


The records I got also reveal the number of hours the FBI devoted to the project, which required some agents to work nights and weekends. The FBI paid personnel from various divisions, including counterintelligence and international operations, $851,344 in overtime for working on the Epstein files between March 17 and March 22, according to the documents. FBI personnel clocked in a total of 4,737 hours of overtime between January and July. Of that, more than 70% [3,315 hours] occurred during the month of March while personnel reviewed the Epstein files, the documents show.

Image
Click here to view the documents (page 23)

Fiscal Year / Pay Period / Pay Period Start Date / Total Overtime Hours per Pay Period

2025 / 1 / 1.12.2025 / 100.50
2025 / 2 / 1.26.2025 / 99.50
2025 / 3 / 2.9.2025 / 145.50
2025 / 4 / 2.23.2025 / 104.75
2025 / 5 / 3.9.2025 / 3,060.00
2025 / 6 / 3.23.2025 / 412.25

2025 / 7 / 4.6.2025 / 292.75
2025 / 8 / 4.20.2025 / 73.75
2025 / 9 / 5.4.2025 / 89.00
2025 / 10 / 5.18.2025 / 51.00
2025 / 11 / 6.1.2025 / 46.00
2025 / 12 / 6.15.2025 / 68.25
2025 / 13 / 6.29.2025 / 45.00
2025 / 14 / 7.13.2025 / 64.00
2025 / 15 / 7.27.2025 / 84.75

Total Overtime Hours: 4,737.00


‘Boxes’

In an email on March 10, FBI personnel from the Office of General Counsel and the bureau’s Information Management Division discussed pending FOIA requests for Epstein-related records and digitizing and redacting “physical files” and the bureau’s “commitment to transparency.”

Image
Click here to view the documents (page 12)

Sam-
Please see attached.
Also, I was in a meeting today with Criminal Division, NY and WFO and there were questions on the types of redactions the FBI should apply to these files. [DELETE]
[DELETE]

Once we nail that down, IMD is ready to process.

We are prepared to receive boxes tomorrow, as NY agents are traveling to WFO in the morning, and will arrive to Winchester where they will start photographing and we will start scanning and processing the physical files. Once I see the volume, I'll have a better estimate of processing times, although I suggest we do a rolling delivery to further demonstrate the FBIs commitment to delivery and transparency.

Tomorrow, I'll have a recap of historic FOIA cases (# received, # already processed, # active litigations).

Call me anytime.

Shannon

Shannon V.H. Parry
Assistant Director
Information Management Division
o: [DELETE]
cc: [DELETE]


Another email describes categories of videos the FBI reviewed related to certain Epstein files, which includes “search warrant execution photos,” “street surveillance video” and “aerial footage from FBI search warrant execution.”

A couple of weeks later, an email sent from the Information and Management Division said the office “continues discussions with DOJ and is awaiting clarification regarding additional criteria for the next phase of this project.”

“We continue to scope and update workflow processes and training material based on those discussions,” the March 22 email says. “Updated training materials and workflow guidance is expected for dissemination later tonight.”

The next day another email was sent to FBI personnel reviewing the Epstein files advising them to “stand by.”

“We have identified more files requiring Phase l review. Please continue to refresh as files will be populated momentarily,” the email said.

The emails indicate FBI personnel were continuously checking out Epstein files to review and redact.

On March 24, an email sent to FBI personnel said “Phase 1 redactions are complete” and “Phase 2” was being prepared for “final delivery to DOJ.”

“Phase 2 review of the new criteria provided by DOJ was approximately 75.2% complete,” the email said. “Upon completion of Phase 2,” the Information Management Division “will provide a copy of all see-through redaction files for DOJ review.”


Bureau personnel also reviewed videos. According to an April 15 email, one of the videos was from the New York City jail where Epstein was found dead a month after his arrest in 2019 on sex trafficking charges. (The DOJ publicly released 11 hours of the prison video in July.)

Image
Click here to view the documents (page 18)

In addition, regarding
90A-NY-3151127 (Epstein suicide investigation)- 1B46 & 1B53 - Review is complete.

1B46: CART download of [DELETE]
[DELETE]

1B53: MCC video containing 147 cameras (8.08 TB of data) that were active before and after Epstein was found dead. Each video is 24 hours long. The cameras were stationed all over the prison at various locations and angles. They did not capture anything significant related to the suicide since the cameras in the Special Housing Unit, where Epstein was located, were not active at the time.

Thank you, and the team and I are happy to address any questions.
Leslie


That same day, Parry sent an email to other FBI personnel that said Patel “asked for status of all remaining Epstein-related reviews.”

Image
Click here to view the documents (pages 18 and 19)

From: Parry, Shannon Vh (IMD) (FBI) [DELETE]
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:28:43 1 AM
To: Williams, Justin W. (IMD) (FBI) [DELETE] Backschies, Leslie R. (NY) (FBI) [DELETE] DELETE] (NY) (FBI) [DELETE]
Cc: Germano, Joseph W. Jr. (IMD) (FBI) [DELETE]
Subject: RE: 1a videos

Leslie [DELETE]

The Director has asked for status of all remaining Epstein-related reviews.

FBI(25-cv-2848)-

________________

Can you let me know what your teams are working on and status.

Also, confirming from my end - 1B is all done (wasn't there some communication that stated NY was to stop processing 1B outside of the 50-NY case?) Please send that.

Thank you,
Shannon


On May 2, an FBI employee from the New York field office sent an email and attached a document titled, “Epstein Overview FINAL” that summarized their work. The FBI withheld a copy of the attachment.

Image
Click here to view the documents (page 20)

From: [DELETE] (NY) (FBI)
Subject: INITIAL DRAFT of Epstein Overview
To: Backshies, Leslie R. (NY) (FBI) [DELETE] (NY) (FBI) [DELETE] (NY) (FBI) [DELETE] [DELETE] (NY) (FBI) [DELETE] (NY) (FBI)
Cc: [DELETE] (NY) (FBI)
Sent: May 2, 2025 10:55 PM (UTC-04:00)
Attached: Epstein Overview FINAL (draft 1).docx

Bosses,

Please see FBI New York C-20's draft response to OD Parry's request.

For Section III (Timeline), I cannot be absolutely certain what all was provided to DOJ. I included all information provided by C-20 up the chain. I highlighted those items I knew had been provided to DOJ because I was in direct contact or was told specifically.

I believe Section IV (Material Processed) would best be filled in my IMD/RIDS with the exception of (iv.) which I explained.

The only thing missing is IMD's contributions, as well as CID if they have anything to add. I would suggest that our draft be sent to the appropriate HQ equities so they can add to this document, as necessary. They should then send back to FBI NYO for [DELETE] to polish for the final product sent by the ADIC to OD Parry on Monday.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

[DELETE]
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39315
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Previous

Return to Sacrifice Virgins, Get World by the Balls: The Mossad's Lolita Gambit

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest