Epstein Estate Documents - Batch 7 / TEXT / 002 from House

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 8/22/2018 4:26:31 PM
To: Tim Zagat
Subject: Re:
im back in ny after the 15th of sept
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Tim Zagat < > wrote:
Jeffrey,
I'm sending you a copy of House of Trump, House of Putin in case you haven't already received 10.
When are you available to get together?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033110

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 8/29/2018 4:27:12 PM
To: Nicholas Ribis___________________________________________
Subject: Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels I Bossip
did you get your money?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Ribis < > wrote:
In Europe saw this it will drive him crazy!!
https://bossip.com/1664506/premature-po ... es-inside-
her-pornographic-pleasure-pocket-43081/
Sent from my iPhone
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033111

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033112
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 9/4/2018 1:40:13 AM
To: Neal Kassell
Subject: Re: Introduction
yes
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Neal Kassell < > wrote:
Will do
Does Leslie do your schedule?
Sent from my iPad
N F Kassell MD
On Sep 3, 2018, at 8:49 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
yes, will be in town , coordiante a time closer . look forward to it
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Neal Kassell < > wrote:
Thanks
Jeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the
25th through Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available.
Be well.
Sent from my iPhone
N F Kassell MD
On Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM, wrote:
Jeffrey - Neal
Neither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke -
Donald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pine
introduced us ...
Neal will be visiting NYC end of month.
I think you would both enjoy spending time together -
Thanks to you both for always supporting me.
You are both copied.
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033112
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033113

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033114
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 9/7/2018 3:17:10 PM
To: Stephen Hanson
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/politics/trump-un-security-council-
iran.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033114

Trump to Preside Over U.N. Security Council, Prompting Anxiety All Around
by Mark Landler and Maggie Haberman
New York Times
Sept. 6, 2018
https://web.archive.org/web/20210504120 ... e=Homepage

[x]
In a visit to the United Nations General Assembly last year, President Trump did not appear to be concerned about bruising any feelings.Credit...Chang W. Lee/The New York Times

WASHINGTON — Three weeks from now, in New York, President Trump will find himself in the setting he most relishes: seated at the head of a polished table, calling on those seated around him, rewarding those he likes and cutting off those who displease him.

It is not a revival of “The Apprentice,” or even a meeting of his cabinet. Mr. Trump will be presiding at the United Nations Security Council, a rotating role that falls to the United States this month. His star turn is prompting anxiety among people, inside and outside the administration, who worry that the president will bring reality-TV antics to the world stage.

Exercising the prerogative of the chairman, Mr. Trump plans to focus on Iran and its malign activity around the Middle East. European diplomats said they fear that this will only underscore the disunity of the West, given the unpopularity of Mr. Trump’s decision to pull the United States out of the Iran nuclear deal.

Already, the president’s choice of subject has drawn objections from Russia, which said the focus of the meeting should be entirely on the nuclear deal and Mr. Trump’s exit from it, and Iran, which accused Mr. Trump of abusing his leadership of the council to vilify a single country.

The resistance is not limited to foreigners. At the State Department, the National Security Council and the American mission to the United Nations, there are privately voiced qualms about Mr. Trump leading a discussion on a complex, divisive subject with foreign leaders who were fiercely opposed to his handling of the nuclear deal.

American officials are discussing whether to reframe the session on the broader region or a different theme to reduce the risk of things going awry, though it is unclear whether the president will be receptive.

By all accounts, Mr. Trump is excited about presiding over the most exclusive club devoted to world peace and security. And he appears equally ready to shake up the customs of that club, where the last time an American leader presided — Barack Obama in 2014 — he chose a theme that the other members could readily embrace: combating foreign terrorist fighters.

Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, accused Mr. Trump on Wednesday of using the session to “blame Iran for horrors US & clients have unleashed across” the Middle East. He noted that the only Security Council resolution currently in force on Iran is the nuclear deal.

Under the rules of the Security Council, Mr. Zarif or even Hassan Rouhani, the Iranian president, is entitled to a seat at the meeting and to be called on by Mr. Trump. Administration officials said they believed it was unlikely that Mr. Rouhani would turn up, though he is scheduled to attend the General Assembly, which meets at the same time.

Even if he did come, officials said Mr. Trump might leave the meeting before it was Iran’s turn to speak. It would be called on only after all 15 members of the Security Council had spoken, a process that could take half a day. If Mr. Trump left early, he would most likely hand over his seat to the American ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki R. Haley.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Ms. Haley acknowledged that some council members would find Iran an “uncomfortable” subject. But, she said, “I personally think that when we talk about things that are uncomfortable in the Security Council, good things happen.”

“President Trump is very adamant that we have to start making sure that Iran is falling in line with international order,” Ms. Haley added. “And we continue to see them engage in things that are not helpful, whether it’s in Lebanon, whether it’s in Yemen, whether we’re looking at Syria.”

[x]
It is unlikely that President Hassan Rouhani of Iran will attend the Security Council meeting, Trump administration officials said, though he is entitled to a seat.Credit...Chang W. Lee/The New York Times

That is one of the primary arguments for Mr. Trump’s decision to focus on Iran, other American officials said. The furor over the nuclear deal, they said, had crowded out discussion of Iran’s other activities.

The United States is warning allies, for example, that Iranian missiles pose a threat to civilian aircraft in the Persian Gulf. But particularly among Europeans, officials said, those dangers often get subsumed in the continuing discussion of why Mr. Trump abandoned the deal.

Some officials played down the risks of Mr. Trump’s appearance. Diplomatic protocol almost guarantees that the meeting will be a series of canned speeches rather than a freewheeling debate, in which Mr. Trump could either be rattled or be seen as bullying other leaders.

In any event, Mr. Trump has shown himself to be gleefully unconcerned with bruising feelings.

In his first visit to the General Assembly last year, he declared, “I will always put America first, just like you, as the leaders of your countries, will always and should always put your countries first” — a call for sovereignty at odds with the mission of the United Nations as a body created to deal collectively with problems that transcend borders.

He referred to the country of one African leader as “Nambia,” prompting questions about whether he had conflated Namibia with Gambia or Zambia (the White House later clarified that he meant Namibia). From the rostrum of the General Assembly, he said of North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, “Rocket Man is on a suicide mission.”

Mr. Trump returns to the United Nations after having launched an audacious diplomatic overture to Mr. Kim. While in New York, Ms. Haley said, he planned to meet President Moon Jae-in of South Korea to discuss the nuclear negotiations, which have stalled in recent weeks.

Mr. Trump can also claim progress in his efforts to isolate Iran, however unpopular they have been. The country’s currency, the rial, plummeted to record lows this week amid fears that the sanctions Mr. Trump is reimposing will cripple its oil exports and broader economy.

Beyond faulting Iran’s behavior, though, it is not clear what Mr. Trump hopes to accomplish when he sits at the horseshoe-shaped table in the Security Council’s chamber. With so much resistance to his Iran policy from Russia, China and other veto-wielding members, there is no prospect of winning support for any kind of resolution.

When Mr. Obama first led a council meeting in 2009, the United States won passage of a resolution that promised tougher scrutiny of countries that proliferated nuclear weapons. Days later, the White House revealed intelligence showing that Iran had built a secret uranium enrichment facility in a mountain near the holy city of Qum.

In 2014, with the Islamic State terrorizing Iraq and Syria, Mr. Obama pushed a resolution in the council to crack down on the financing, and movement of people signing up to fight for foreign terrorist organizations.

While an American-led military campaign largely vanquished the Islamic State, Mr. Obama’s 2009 nonproliferation resolution did nothing to prevent North Korea from making new nuclear bombs, although he did negotiate the deal that blocked Iran’s ability to do so.

For Mr. Trump, marshaling global support against Iran seems less of a priority in New York than defiantly advancing his own get-tough policy. Aides said the decision to focus on Iran was very much the president’s — and no one actively pushed back on it, whatever their qualms.

For a president who hushed dissent in his reality-TV days with a simple “You’re fired,” the question is, how will he react if the would-be apprentices from Iran and Russia refuse to go quietly?

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033115
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 9/17/2018 7:12:25 PM
To: Thomas Jr., Landon
Subject: Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted
its the leader for the next years .
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Thomas Jr., Landon <
> wrote:
China's big tech stocks have fallen into a bear
market at the same time that regulatory threats
against U.S. big tech companies are gaining
momentum. Can U.S. big tech stocks soldier on
alone or is this a harbinger that the group as a whole
is losing its tremendous leadership position?
Sep 13, 2018
Technology & Security
• Tech Backlash
• Save Article
• Download PDF
•
• big-tech-backlash
In recent months, China's BAT collapse has demonstrated how costly the expectation of
invincibility can be—Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent are all down more than 24%
from their year-to-date closing highs. Citigroup's head of Asia strategy, Mohammed
Apabhai, told CNN an apt analogy about the investor sentiment that led to BAT's collapse,
likening "the exuberance for tech stocks to the Looney Tunes cartoons in which Wile E.
Coyote chases Road Runner over a cliff." Given they've more or less moved in
tandem for years, will FAANG follow the same path as BAT?
' EtSFILir.,
Source: Stockcharts.com
The BAT collapse was triggered by subpar earnings and a shifting regulatory environment
in China. Facebook's miss in 2Q18—which drove a $120 billion single-day market cap
loss, the biggest ever for a U.S. company—showed how decisive a turn could be if more
U.S. tech darlings stumble this quarter.
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033115
There are mounting fundamental reasons to question the 3Q18 earnings
prospects of FAANG, from the accelerating user backlash against Facebook to Apple's
trade war exposure to Amazon's rapidly-intensifying workforce revolt that could see the e-
commerce giant left with no option but to raise wages and improve workplace conditions
for its warehouse and Whole Foods employees.
However, as Apabhai suggests, the message BAT is sending is less about earnings, and
more about the cost of exuberance. And FAANG exuberance faces threats that go beyond
fundamentals. A flurry of regulatory announcements last week signaled the
political tide has turned in the U.S. Across every branch of government, the
message was consistent: the U.S. no longer trusts tech giants to self-
police. And the public agrees—according to a Gallup poll last month, 79% of
Americans now believe "tech companies should be regulated the same way
the news media is."
Regardless of political will, threats may not turn to action in the near term. Nonetheless,
FAANG appears increasingly vulnerable to a decisive sentiment shift. At some point, the
relentless barrage of bad news will force investors to begin pricing in regulatory
risks. Any sustained stumble by FAANG's leadership could cripple exuberance, and cause
an unraveling of passive and algorithmic strategies that are heavily overweight tech
(see W/LTWApril 7, 2018 for more). We will continue to watch closely to
estimate timing, but given SAT's collapse, today more than ever, acute
scrutiny of tech giant leadership is required.
Through August 28, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft had accounted for greater than 35% of
the S&P 500's total return this year, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices data. It took
Amazon just 165 trading days to grow its market value from $600 billion in January to $1
trillion. The combined market cap of FAAMG (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and
Google) now sits over $4 trillion, or roughly equal to the combined market cap of the 283
smallest S&P 500 members.
Tech's continued market leadership means investors have largely discounted
the mounting risks tech giants face. We have been warning about the downsides of
tech giant monopolism for more than two years in these pages, from surveillance/data
security concerns to anticompetitive behavior and their role in escalating inequality. For
the political establishment, for the media, for the public, this year has seen a
broad awakening—the Cambridge Analytica scandal, the backlash against Jeff Bezos'
astonishing wealth, and tech's ever-skyrocketing market caps were all warning
signs. The past month signals a new phase has begun: from a distant
rumbling of change to preparation for action.
The number of significant tech-related regulatory developments that have emerged from
the U.S. and the E.U. in recent weeks is nothing short of staggering. Here is an
abbreviated list:
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033116
• President Trump attacked Google for liberal bias, and claimed Google, Facebook,
and Amazon represent "a very antitrust situation".
• Attorney General Jeff Sessions convened a meeting of Republican state
attorneys general to discuss whether tech giants "may be hurting competition and
intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas on their platforms."
• Facebook, Twitter, and Google were called to testify in front of the House and Senate
about election interference, political bias, etc. Google declined to attend.
• The FTC has begun a series of hearings on Digital Age antitrust, the first such
hearings since the 1990s.
• The FTC revealed the hiring of Lina Kahn—heralded for authoring a groundbreaking
antitrust argument against Amazon—as an advisor. (See section 5 for more.)
• Republican Senator Orrin Hatch asked the FTC to reopen a 2013
antitrust case against Google.
• Democratic Senator Mark Warner released a six-point policy proposal on regulating
the tech industry.
• Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders proposed the "BEZOS Act", which would tax
corporations one dollar for every dollar low-wage workers receive in government health-
care benefits or food stamps.
• The E.U. Parliament voted 438 to 226 to back a draft proposal of
copyright reformsthat will impose unprecedented liability on information platforms.
• France is pushing to have "Right to be Forgotten" laws applied globally,
which Google is now fighting in court.
• Reports emerged that the E.U. is considering investigating Google's location-
tracking practices on data privacy grounds.
We will continue to watch each development in the U.S. and E.U. closely to understand if
and when debate turns to action. For now, we agree with the analysis of NYU Stern
professor Scott Galloway, who told CNBC last week after the congressional hearings:
I don't see anything meaningful coming out of this panel, much less Washington...D.C.
lacks the domain expertise or the will to go after big tech. Where you may
see it is, one, out of Brussels and, two, out of [the FTC, the DOJ, or] a red
state whose attorney general sees the brightest path between the AG's mansion and the
governor's mansion is a populist argument against big tech.
Evidence of fundamental weakness could exacerbate the investor reaction to escalating
regulatory news. By all accounts, Facebook has continued to bleed
users. According to Pew Research poll results released earlier this month, more than a
quarter of U.S. Facebook users claim to have deleted the app from their phones over the
past year:
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033117
Source: Recode
Then there's Apple. The trade war combined with China's slowing economy present a
significant short-term threat to the company's profits. As we note in section
1, smartphone handset sales in China in August were reported at 32.6 million
units, a decline of 20.9% year-over-year and 11.8% month-on-
month. Moreover, no firm could suffer more if China decides to target tech
supply chains in retaliation to Trump's tariffs.
Yet, the risks extend beyond Asia. On Wednesday, Apple announced its newest
generation of iPhones. It is following the same strategy as last year, releasing ever-more
expensive phones as it tries to keep profit growth on pace despite a largely-matured
smartphone market. As The Wall Street Journal reported this week, projections suggest
last year's $1,000 iPhone X underperformed previous launches: "Even for Apple and
its devoted fans, the art of the upsell appears to have some limits...Analysts
believe the iPhone X has accounted for about 30% of iPhone unit sales in the recent nine-
month period...That is below the share the company's newest models typically get in a
given cycle." Will a $1,200 iPhone cross the limits of what the market will tolerate?
We have roughly a month until 3Q18 earnings season begins. For years, big tech's
remarkable profit trajectory has generated an air of invincibility. BAT's earnings miss
combined with Facebook's earnings miss has cracked that expectation. As news
reports of regulatory threats continue to flood in and as tech giant profit
doubts mount, the weeks to come could see that crack turn to a fissure.
Then there's Apple. The trade war combined with China's slowing economy
present a significant short-term threat to the company's profits. As we note
in section 1, smartphone handset sales in China in August were reported at
32.6 million units, a decline of 20.9% year-over-year and 11.8% month-on-
month. Moreover, no firm could suffer more if China decides to target tech
supply chains in retaliation to Trump's tariffs.
Yet, the risks extend beyond Asia. On Wednesday, Apple announced its
newest generation of iPhones. It is following the same strategy as last year,
releasing ever-more expensive phones as it tries to keep profit growth on
pace despite a largely-matured smartphone market. As The Wall Street
Journal reported this week, projections suggest last year's $1,000 iPhone X
underperformed previous launches: "Even for Apple and its devoted fans,
the art of the upsell appears to have some limits...Analysts believe the iPhone
X has accounted for about 30% of iPhone unit sales in the recent nine-month
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033118
period...That is below the share the company's newest models typically get in
a given cycle." Will a $1,200 iPhone cross the limits of what the market will
tolerate?
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... e/t/landon jr thomas/index.
html
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033119

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033120
txt
posting.php?mode=reply&f=227&t=4644

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: 9/20/2018 10:01:48 AM
To: Jack LANG
Subject: Re:
i was offline for yom kippur . can you put me in direct contact.? happy holiday
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Jack LANG < > wrote:
Dear Jeffrey,
Dear Jeffrey,
Have you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?
Our recent conversation on Trump was exciting.
Once again you are right.
See you soon,
With my friendship,
Jack
Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> a ecrit:
Jack- tom - tom jacques
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033120
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033121

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: J [[email protected]]
Sent: 9/26/2018 5:14:42 PM
To: Jack LANG
Subject: Re:
tom pritzker has asked if you have ideas re the Pritzker Prize
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Jack LANG <__________
Dear Jeffrey,
Dear Jeffrey,
Have you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?
Our recent conversation on Trump was exciting.
Once again you are right.
See you soon,
With my friendship,
Jack
:> wrote:
Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> a ecrit:
Jack- tom - tom jacques
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033122
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033123

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033124
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: J [[email protected]]
Sent: 10/3/2018 9:59:22 AM
To: Alan Dershowitz
Nyt-By age 3, Mr. Trump was earning $200,000 a year in today's dollars from his father's empire. / this is
UNFAIR- what are " todays dollars? The article was written by financial illiterates--
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033124

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033125
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: J [[email protected]]
Sent: 10/3/2018 11:29:06 AM
To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject: Re:
how unfair yes, it was written by financial illiterates. . referencing " todays dollars? with no back
up. IRS looked at all. .they ignored taxes paid along the way.. they didnt understand the rules.. I m not a
supporter but this is nothing but a hit job.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:21 AM Weingarten, Reid < > wrote:
Anything surprise you?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: J
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject: Re:
Florida
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:58 PM Weingarten, Reid < > wrote:
Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Jeffrey E.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM
To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject:
where?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033125
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033126

[admin]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033127
txt
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9bq6uj0p ... tracking=1

From: J [[email protected]]
Sent: 10/5/2018 1:46:57 PM
To: Lawrence H. Summers
Subject: Re:
By age 3, Mr. Trump was earning $200,000 a year in today's dollars from his father's empire. He was a
millionaire by age 8.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 8:31 AM LHS <MI> wrote:
What number should I call in 10
Sent from my iPhone
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at:
Follow me on twitter glhsummers
www.larrysummers.com
On Oct 4, 2018, at 9:19 PM, J <[email protected]> wrote:
Tomorrow
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:27 PM LHS <
830 or so???
Sent from my iPhone
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at:
Follow me on twitter glhsummers
www.larrysummers.com
> wrote:
On Oct 4, 2018, at 6:22 PM, J <[email protected]> wrote:
now?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033127
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033128