US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Gathered together in one place, for easy access, an agglomeration of writings and images relevant to the Rapeutation phenomenon.

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:32 pm

"Economy of Genocide": U.S. Sanctions U.N. Expert Francesca Albanese
by Amy Goodman
Democracy Now!
Jul 10, 2025 Latest Shows





We speak with United Nations expert Francesca Albanese, one day after the Trump administration announced it is imposing sanctions on her over her advocacy for Palestinian rights. Albanese has served as the U.N. special rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory since 2022. She recently released a report highlighting dozens of companies aiding Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory and fueling its genocidal war machine in Gaza, including U.S. tech giants. Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized Albanese’s work as “political and economic warfare” against the United States and its allies.

“It seems that this administration is quite allergic to justice,” says Albanese, speaking to Democracy Now! from Slovenia. “It’s trying to distract us from where our focus should be: What’s happening to the Palestinians in the little that remains of their tormented land, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem.”

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: The Trump administration has imposed sanctions on United Nations special rapporteur for Palestine Francesca Albanese over her report naming dozens of companies she says are profiting from Israeli occupation and genocide in Gaza. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions in a social media post Wednesday, stating, quote, “Albanese’s campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated,” Rubio wrote. Amnesty International blasted the sanctions as a, quote, “shameless and transparent attack on the fundamental principles of international justice.”

Francesca Albanese will join us in a minute. The sanctions were filed after she gave a presentation last week to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva and called on states to impose an arms embargo and cut off trade and financial ties with Israel, which she alleged was, quote, “responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history.”

FRANCESCA ALBANESE: If the genocide has not stopped, it’s not just because there was an — there has always been an economy of the occupation. It’s because the economy of the occupation has turned into an economy of genocide, and so there have been people and organizations that have profited from the violence, the killing, the maiming, the destruction in Gaza and in other parts of the occupied Palestinian territory, because it’s not that the Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are having the happiest time of their life as we speak. In the past 20 months, while the Israeli army, and accompanied by settlers, was devastating Palestinian lives and landscapes, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange soared by 213%, amassing over 220 billions in market gains, including 76.8 billion U.S. dollars in the past month alone. So, clearly, for some, genocide is profitable.

AMY GOODMAN: For more, we’re joined by Francesca Albanese herself, the U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory. Her landmark report is headlined “From economy of occupation to economy of genocide.”

Francesca, we last spoke to you in our New York City studio. You’re now in the capital of Slovenia. You’ve just held a news conference. This news has just come out in the last day that the U.S. is going to sanction you, the U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory. Trump has already sanctioned top International Criminal Court officials, like the ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan. The ICC has come out with an arrest warrant for both Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and the former Israeli defense minister. Can you respond to the sanctions against you and what they mean?

FRANCESCA ALBANESE: Hi, Amy. Hi, Nermeen. Thank you for being — for having me with you.

What I respond, it seems that this administration is quite allergic to justice, isn’t it? I woke up this morning. I could take my shower. I could talk to my kids. I could meet the wonderful people of Slovenia, institutions and ordinary citizens alike, without the sound of drones. Yes, I skipped breakfast, but I chose it. I was not starving. I’m not starving. And this is the situation of the people of Gaza. This is what we need to talk about, because what the U.S. is doing — I mean, people can make their own assessment of it — is distracting us, is trying to distract us from where our focus should be: what’s happening to the Palestinians in what remains, the little that remains, of their tormented land, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And could you talk, Francesca, about the fact that this announcement came on while Netanyahu is in Washington, D.C., in fact, his third visit to the United States since Trump came into office in January?

FRANCESCA ALBANESE: Yeah, in fact, I should correct it. It’s not that this administration is allergic to justice. It’s attracted to injustice more than justice, because the ICC-wanted-for-war-crimes-and-crimes-against-humanity Benjamin Netanyahu doesn’t belong to Washington, D.C. He belongs to The Hague or anywhere else where he can be prosecuted, as the ICC has requested.

Look, I’m more than — I mean, I know the United States is not a member to the Rome Statute, has imposed the sanctions on the ICC. And technically, the argument to impose the sanctions against me is that I cooperate with the ICC. Surely so, like anyone who wants justice. The ICC is based on the Rome Statute. And I’m a proud Italian, happy that it was my country and the capital of my country to give the name to the statute of the International Criminal Law Court, that is — I mean, this is also the legacy of World War II and the Holocaust. Universal justice starts with that. So. look at the paradox. But again, I’m more horrified that my own country, Italy, and Greece and France, three member states of the Rome Statute, allowed ICC-wanted-for-war-crimes-and-crimes-against-humanity Benjamin Netanyahu to fly with his airplane toward Washington, D.C., over their soils, because this is unacceptable. They should have not given concession — such a concession. He must be arrested.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: So, Francesca, let’s go to your report, the U.N. report, “From economy of occupation to economy of genocide.” When we had you on earlier this year — sorry, last year in October, you were working on a report. The report had just come out on “Genocide as colonial erasure.” You’ve also issued another report, “Anatomy of a genocide.” So, explain why and when you moved your focus to the economic beneficiaries of what’s been happening in Gaza.

FRANCESCA ALBANESE: Yeah, look, I decided to investigate the private sector in February 2023, when I went to Norway, and for the first time I saw what many had already been investigating and denouncing — the BDS movement, Don’t Buy into Occupation, Profundo, SOMO, Who Profits — the fact that there were people making business in the — you know, in the system, within the system of the military occupation that Israel was maintaining over the occupied Palestinian territory.

Now, really, as someone has said, only a lawyer can take ages to realize the economic, the political economic — economics of the occupation. But, however, times — I mean, two years later, I was into the investigation of all the companies that I had started to collect information about, two years later, because in the middle was a genocide. I needed to make sense of the military assault that since October 2023 Israel had launched against the Gaza Strip, while also accelerating the annexation and the ethnic cleansing in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.

And as I collected, together with my team and all the actors that contributed, the lawyers, investigative journalists and others who contributed to the acquisition of information, that I verified, to the setup of a database of 1,000 entities, of which I just collected those eminent cases that help illustrate the system. So, Amy, my report is not to be read as a duplicate of the database that the U.N. has set up years ago and is updating. It’s illustrative of a system, an economy of occupation. Israel would have not been able to maintain the military occupation without the support, the means, the weapons, the machinery, the technology, the legitimacy that has come, including from the pension funds, including the Norwegian pension funds, the —

AMY GOODMAN: Francesca —

FRANCESCA ALBANESE: — legitimacy of the universities, and so on and so forth.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to last month. Norway’s largest pension fund, what you’re referring to, known as KLP, announced it would no longer invest in two companies that sell equipment to the Israeli military, the pension fund managing the savings of about 900,000 Norwegian municipal workers. Democracy Now! spoke to Kiran Aziz, head of responsible investments at KLP, about how they came to the decision.

KIRAN AZIZ: KLP, as Norway’s largest pension company, has decided to exclude companies Oshkosh Corporation and ThyssenKrupp, due to their sales of weapons to the Israeli military. KLP learned from a report conducted by the U.N. High Commissioner on Human Rights that several companies were supplying weapons or equipment to the Israeli Defense Force, and these weapons are being used in Gaza. On the basis of this information, KLP has done a thorough assessment of the companies, but also engaged in dialogue with them in order to understand what kind of due diligence they have performed. And like in all other situations, companies have an independent duty to exercise due diligence in order to avoid complicity. But based on our assessment, these companies have failed to demonstrate any due diligence at all, and these companies are also having a long-standing collaboration with the IDF, and weapons deliveries have continued after the outbreak of the war in Gaza. Exclusion is an important tool for us to reduce KLP’s association with unacceptable conditions that are ongoing or likely to occur in the future. But exclusion is also a way to hold companies accountable, because we all need to respect international law and humanitarian law.

AMY GOODMAN: So, that was Kiran Aziz, head of responsible investments at KLP. Meanwhile, one of the world’s largest shipping companies, Maersk, has recently announced it will divest from companies linked to illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, following a sustained pressure campaign called “Mask Off Maersk,” that was led by Palestinian Youth Movement. This is Nadya Tannous, international coordinator of the campaign.

NADYA TANNOUS: Yeah, this is a huge win for the movement. Maersk is the Danish logistics giant. They’re one of the largest companies on the planet. And they are the first logistics company ever to cease transportation of settlement goods, all settlement products into the Israeli settlements and out of the Israeli settlements. I think that this is a large step, a first step, to isolating the Israeli settlements from the global economy, which decreases their ability to terrorize the Palestinian people, to annex more land and to continue to break international law. We also were able to ascertain this win, not because we demanded divestment from the settlements, but because we lifted the political ceiling and we demanded a people’s arms embargo. Maersk is still complicit in the transshipment of arms and weapons components, of military cargo to the Israeli Ministry of Defense. They’re endemic to the supply chain of the F-35 bomber, which is one of the most expensive and deadliest weapons on the market. And that’s why Maersk, this news, came the same week as the Francesca Albanese report, which details at length multiple corporations that are complicit in the genocide of the Palestinian people and profiting off of that genocide. Maersk is one of them.

AMY GOODMAN: So, that’s Nadya Tannous of the Palestine Youth Movement. Francesca Albanese, as you listen to both women, from Norway and taking on the Danish company Maersk, if you can talk about the other companies that you’ve been targeting, and if these U.S. sanctions are going to change your approach?

FRANCESCA ALBANESE: You know, let me share an anecdote, because this is really telling. I’ve been engaging with a major newspaper who refused to report on my report because it was not accurate. And, I mean, it was not accurate, not solid enough, not solid enough, because I had used as a source this particular report, the work that this Youth Movement has done. And you see the condescending attitude of the West and the saviorism that we carry. The Youth Movement is associated with lack of expertise. I’m so glad that the world is changing, and we are in the hands — with this young generation, we are in better hands.

What I want to reflect on, as listening — as answering your question, Amy, is something that Nadya said, meaning it’s the endemic, that there are certain services that companies are providing that go to something that is endemic to the illegal occupation, to the apartheid structure that Israel has maintained over the years over the Palestinians, and now has even turned genocidal. And it’s the fact that when people have concentrated their attention, without any result, on settlements — settlements are clearly at the heart of the problem, but they’re entrenched in the Israeli system. The universities have been legitimizing and giving even means. They’ve been transferring funds and endowments to the Israeli occupation and very ideology of erasure of the Palestinian people. This is why I say there is no neutral sector when it comes to — when it comes to Israel as the state, which has maintained for 57 years an unlawful occupation. And when you look at the water sector, the electricity, for example, there is one grid. There is one way of exploiting, extracting and exploiting Palestinian resources, and then depriving the Palestinians of them.

This is why today I do not call for sanctions on individuals and on companies producing in the settlements. This is the past century. This is the old Bible. This is what we have to do today, is to act like intelligent people and realize that if Israel is accused in different international proceedings of war crimes, crimes against humanity and even genocide, it’s Israel as a state which is to face the consequences, including sanctions and cutting economic ties with Israel as a state.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: So, Francesca Albanese, we just have 30 seconds, but if you could talk about — and then we’ll continue with you after the program for a taped show. If you could say to what extent you were inspired by the divestment campaign against apartheid South Africa? You spoke about that at the U.N.

FRANCESCA ALBANESE: Certainly, I was, of course, but not — I mean, not much. I was more inspired — I mean, not that I was not inspired. It’s just that what led me was the need to understand the occupation and the apartheid, and then the campaign made sense to me against apartheid South Africa and against apartheid Israel. Takes time to a lawyer.

AMY GOODMAN: Francesca Albanese, we want to thank you for being with us. Please stay with us. We’re going to do a post-show, a web exclusive, post it at democracynow.org. U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory. We’ll link to your report, “From economy of occupation to economy of genocide.” She was speaking to us from the U.S. first lady’s, Melania Trump’s country, Slovenia. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:38 pm

Part 1 of 3

FROM ECONOMY OF OCCUPATION TO ECONOMY OF GENOCIDE. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967*, **
Report of the Special Rapporteur [Francesca Albanese] on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967*
Human Rights Council
Fifty-ninth session
16 June–11 July 2025
Agenda item 7: Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories
https://www.un.org/unispal/document/a-h ... tine-2025/

FROM ECONOMY OF OCCUPATION TO ECONOMY OF GENOCIDE
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967*, **
Summary
This report investigates the corporate machinery sustaining Israel’s settler-colonial project of displacement and replacement of the Palestinians in the occupied territory. While political leaders and governments shirk their obligations, far too many corporate entities have profited from Israel’s economy of illegal occupation, apartheid and now, genocide. The complicity exposed by this report is just the tip of the iceberg; ending it will not happen without holding the private sector accountable, including its executives. International law recognizes varying degrees of responsibility – each requiring scrutiny and accountability, particularly in this case, where a people’s self-determination and very existence are at stake. This is a necessary step to end the genocide and dismantle the global system that has allowed it.
I. Introduction
1. Colonial endeavours and their associated genocides have historically been driven and enabled by the corporate sector.[1] Commercial interests have contributed to the dispossession of Indigenous people and lands[2] – a mode of domination known as “colonial racial capitalism”.[3] The same is true of Israeli colonization of Palestinian lands,[4] its expansion into the occupied Palestinian territory and its institutionalization of a regime of settler-colonial apartheid.[5] After denying Palestinian self-determination for decades, Israel is now imperilling the very existence of the Palestinian people in Palestine.
2. The role of corporate entities in sustaining Israel’s illegal occupation and ongoing genocidal campaign in Gaza is the subject of this investigation, which focuses on how corporate interests underpin Israeli settler-colonial the twofold logic of displacement and replacement aimed at dispossessing and erasing Palestinians from their lands. It discusses corporate entities in various sectors: arms manufacturers, tech firms, building and construction companies, extractive and service industries, banks, pension funds, insurers, universities and charities. These entities enable the denial of self-determination and other structural violations in the occupied Palestinian territory, including occupation, annexation and crimes of apartheid and genocide, as well as a long list of ancillary crimes and human rights violations, from discrimination, wanton destruction, forced displacement and pillage, to extrajudicial killing and starvation.
3. Had proper human rights due diligence been undertaken, corporate entities would have long ago disengaged from Israeli occupation. Instead, post-October 2023, corporate actors have contributed to the acceleration of the displacement-replacement process throughout the military campaign that has pulverized Gaza and displaced the largest number of Palestinians in the West Bank since 1967.[6]
4. While it is impossible to fully capture the scale and extent of decades of corporate connivance in the exploitation of the occupied Palestinian territory, this report exposes the integration of the economies of settler-colonial occupation and genocide. It calls for accountability for corporate entities and their executives at both domestic and international levels: commercial endeavours enabling and profiting from the obliteration of innocent people’s lives must cease. Corporate entities must refuse to be complicit in human rights violations and international crimes or be held to account.
II. Methodology
5. “Corporate entities” in this report refers to business enterprises, multinational corporations, for-profit and not-for-profit entities, whether private, public or State-owned.[7] Corporate responsibility applies regardless of the size, sector, operational context, ownership and structure of the entity.[8]
6. The report builds on extensive literature, especially by civil society[9] and by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights, on how Israel has created and maintained its own economy through the occupation, and a captive economy for the Palestinians.
7. It also builds upon and situates within the broader matrix of Israel’s unlawful occupation, the database established by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), pursuant to Human Rights Council resolutions 31/36 and 53/25. The “UN Database” lists only business enterprises that have “directly and indirectly enabled, facilitated and profited from the construction and growth of the settlements”.[10]
8. The Special Rapporteur developed a database of 1000 corporate entities from the unprecedented 200+ submissions received, following her call for input when preparing this investigation.[11] This helped map how corporate entities worldwide have been implicated in human rights violations and international crimes in the occupied Palestinian territory. Over 45 entities named in the report have been duly informed of the facts that led the Special Rapporteur to formulate a series of allegations: 15 replied. The complex web of corporate structures – and the often obscured links between parents and subsidiaries, franchises, joint ventures, licencees, etc. – implicates many more. The investigation behind this report demonstrates the lengths to which corporations will go to conceal their complicity.[12]
9. The report is complemented by an annex presenting the relevant legal framework.
III. Legal context
10. The law governing corporate responsibility has deep roots in the historic relationship between violent dispossession and private power, and the legacy of corporate collusion with settler-colonialism and racial segregation.[13]
11. Early charter companies, granted broad State-like powers, gradually evolved into private “limited liability” corporations as intercolonial trade grew vital to European economies.[14] Colonial powers continued to rely on these relationships to outsource, obscure and avoid accountability for the dispossession and enslavement of Indigenous peoples and the expropriation of their resources.[15] Corporations have not only inherited the benefits of this legal veil of separation, but have also emerged as shapers of international law.[16]
12. Today, some corporate conglomerates exceed the GDP of sovereign States.[17] Sometimes wielding more power – political, economic and discursive – than States themselves, corporations enjoy increasing recognition as rights-holders, with still insufficient corresponding obligations. The asymmetry of immense power without sufficiently justiciable accountability exposes a fundamental global governance gap.
13. Corporations and their home States – primarily Global Minority States – continue to exploit structural inequalities rooted in colonial dispossession.[18] Meanwhile, weaker regulatory systems in formerly colonized States, and development and investment imperatives mean corporations often evade accountability.[19]
14. Nevertheless, important precedents exist. The post-Holocaust Industrialists’ Trials laid the groundwork for recognizing the international criminal responsibility of corporate executives for participation in international crimes.[20] By addressing corporate complicity in apartheid, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission helped shape corporate responsibility for human rights violations.[21] Increasing domestic and international litigation signal a growing trend toward corporate accountability.[22]
15. The case of Palestine further tests international standards.
16. Today, the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights set out the normative framework for States’ and corporate entities’ compliance with international law.[23] States have the primary obligation to prevent, investigate, punish and remedy human rights abuses by third parties, and may breach their obligations if they fail to do so. The Guiding Principles crystallize the human rights standards applicable to corporate conduct which apply regardless of whether states uphold their primary obligations. International humanitarian law and criminal law also confer specific obligations and liabilities on private actors,[24] with domestic jurisdictions primarily responsible for enforcement.
17. The Guiding Principles establish a continuum of responsibilities, depending on whether corporate entities cause, contribute to or are directly linked with adverse human rights impacts.[25] In conflicts, businesses must observe heightened human rights due diligence to identify concerns and adjust their conduct.[26] The liability of corporate entities will be determined by their actions and by human rights impact: due diligence is not sufficient to absolve corporations of liability.[27] At a minimum, corporate entities directly linked to human rights impacts must exercise leverage or consider termination of their activities or relationships. Failure to act accordingly may give rise to liability. Where violations constitute crimes, corporate executives and, increasingly, entities themselves, may be held accountable for their knowledge and material contributions to crimes.[28]
18. In the occupied Palestinian territory, building on decades of documented human rights violations and crimes, recent judicial developments leave no room for doubt that corporate engagement with any component of the occupation is connected with violations of jus cogens norms and international crimes.[29] Citing racial segregation and apartheid, violations of the right to self-determination and the prohibition on the use of force, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) unequivocally affirmed the illegality of Israel’s presence including military, colonies, infrastructure and resource control.[30] Furthermore, the atrocities committed since October 2023 triggered proceedings for genocide before the ICJ, and for war crimes and crimes against humanity before the ICC. The ICJ has ordered Israel to stop creating life-destroying conditions, and, in Nicaragua v Germany, reminded States of their international obligations to avoid transferring arms that might be used to violate international conventions.[31]
19. These decisions place on corporate entities a prima facie responsibility to not engage and/or to withdraw totally and unconditionally from any associated dealings, and to ensure that any engagement with Palestinians enables their self-determination.
20. Where corporate entities continue their activities and relationships with Israel – with its economy, military, public and private sectors connected to the occupied Palestinian territory – they may be found to have knowingly contributed to:
• violation of the Palestinian right to self-determination;
• annexation of Palestinian territory, maintenance of an unlawful occupation and therefore the crime of aggression and associated human rights violations;
• crimes of apartheid and genocide, and
• other ancillary crimes and violations.
21. Both criminal and civil laws in various jurisdictions can be invoked to hold corporate entities or their executives accountable for violations of human rights and/or crimes under international law.
IV. From the economy of settler-colonial occupation to the economy of genocide
22. Settler-colonialism involves extraction and profit from, and colonization of, land through the expulsion of its owners.[32] In Palestine, historically, companies have driven and enabled the process of displacement-replacement of the Arab population, foundational to the logic of settler-colonial erasure.[33] The Jewish National Fund, a land-purchasing corporate entity founded in 1901, helped plan and carry out the gradual removal of Arab Palestinians, which intensified with the Nakba[34] and has continued ever since.[35]
23. Increasingly aided by corporate entities, Israel has pursued Palestinian dispossession and displacement, especially after 1967.[36] The corporate sector has materially contributed to this endeavour by providing Israel with the weapons and machinery required to destroy homes, schools, hospitals, places of leisure and worship, livelihoods and productive assets such as olive groves and orchards, to segregate and control communities and restrict access to natural resources.[37] By helping to militarize and incentivize illegal Israeli presence in the occupied Palestinian territory, they have contributed to the creation of the conditions for Palestinian ethnic cleansing.[38]
24. Corporate entities have played a key role in stifling the Palestinian economy,[39] sustaining Israeli expansion in occupied land while facilitating the replacement of Palestinians. Draconian restrictions – on trade and investment, tree planting, fishing and water for colonies – have debilitated agriculture and industry,[40] and turned the occupied Palestinian territory into a captive market;[41] companies have profiteered by exploiting Palestinian labour and resources, degrading and diverting natural resources, building and powering colonies and selling and marketing derived goods and services in Israel, the occupied Palestinian territory and globally.[42] The 1993 Oslo Accords entrenched this exploitation, de facto institutionalizing Israel’s monopoly over 61 per cent of the resource-rich West Bank (Area C).[43] Israel gains from this exploitation, while it costs the Palestinian economy at least 35 per cent of its GDP.[44]
25. Financial and academic institutions have also enabled the conditions for Palestinian displacement-replacement. Banks, asset management firms, pension funds and insurers have channelled finance into the illegal occupation. Universities – centres of intellectual growth and power – have sustained the political ideology underpinning the colonization of Palestinian land,[45] developed weaponry and overlooked or even endorsed systemic violence,[46] while global research collaborations have obscured Palestinian erasure behind a veil of academic neutrality.
26. After October 2023, long-standing systems of control, exploitation and dispossession metamorphosed into economic, technological and political infrastructures mobilized to inflict mass violence and immense destruction.[47] Entities that previously enabled and profited from Palestinian elimination and erasure within the economy of occupation, instead of disengaging are now involved in the economy of genocide.
27. The following sections illustrate how eight key sectors, operating separately and interdependently through the core pillars of the settler-colonial economy of displacement-replacement, have adapted to its genocidal practices.
A. Displacement
28. Post-October 2023, weapons and military technologies used to advance Palestinian expulsion have become tools for mass killing and destruction, rendering Gaza and parts of the West Bank uninhabitable. Surveillance and incarceration technologies, ordinarily used to enforce segregation/apartheid, have evolved into tools for indiscriminate targeting of the Palestinian population. Heavy machinery previously used for house demolitions, infrastructure destruction and resource seizure in the West Bank have been repurposed to obliterate Gaza’s urban landscape, preventing displaced populations from returning and reconstituting as a community.
Military sector: the business of elimination
29. Militarized violence created the State of Israel and remains the engine of its settler-colonial project.[48] Israeli and international weapons manufacturers have developed increasingly effective systems to drive Palestinians off their land. By collaborating and competing, they have refined technologies that enable Israel to intensify oppression, repression and destruction.[49]
30. Prolonged occupation and repeated military campaigns have provided testing grounds for cutting-edge military capabilities: air defence platforms, drones, AI-powered targeting tools and even the US-led F-35 programme. These technologies are then marketed as “battle-proven”.[50]
31. The military-industrial complex has become the economic backbone of the State.[51] Between 2020 and 2024, Israel was the eighth largest arms exporter worldwide.[52] The two most prominent Israeli weapons companies – Elbit Systems, established as a public-private partnership and later privatized, and state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) – are among the top 50 arms manufacturers globally.[53] Since 2023, Elbit has cooperated closely on Israeli military operations, embedding key staff in the Ministry of Defense,[54] and was awarded the 2024 Israeli Defense Prize.[55] Elbit and IAI provide a critical domestic supply of weaponry,[56] and reinforce Israel’s military alliances through arms exports and joint development of military technology.[57]
32. International partnerships providing weaponry and technical support have enhanced Israel’s capacity to perpetuate apartheid and, recently, to sustain its assault on Gaza. Israel benefits from the largest-ever defence procurement programme – for the F-35 fighter jet,[58] led by US-based Lockheed Martin,[59] alongside at least 1600 other companies including Italian manufacturer Leonardo S.p.A,[60] and eight States. Components and parts constructed globally contribute to the Israeli F-35 fleet that Israel customizes and maintains in partnership with Lockheed Martin and domestic companies.[61] Israel was the first to fly the F-35 in combat in 2018, and then to use it in “beast mode” by 2025.[62] Lockheed Martin F-35 and F-16 fighter jets, pivotal to the Israeli air force,[63] have significant carrying and fire capacity, including the 2000lb GBU-31 JDAM bombs and, for F-35s, over 18,000lb of bombs at a time.[64] Post-October 2023, F-35s and F-16s have been integral to equipping Israel with the unprecedented aerial power to drop an estimated 85,000 tons of bombs,[65] kill and injure more than 179,411 Palestinians[66] and obliterate Gaza.[67]
33. Drones, hexacopters and quadcopters have also been omnipresent killing machines in the skies of Gaza.[68] Drones largely developed and supplied by Elbit Systems and IAI have long flown alongside these fighter jets, surveilling Palestinians and delivering target intelligence.[69] In the last two decades, with support from these companies and collaborations with institutions like Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT),[70] Israel’s drones acquired automated weapons systems and the ability to fly in swarm formation.[71]
34. To supply Israel with these weapons and facilitate arms export and import transactions, manufacturers depend on a web of intermediaries, including legal, auditing and consulting firms, as well as arms dealers, agents and brokers.[72] Suppliers like Japanese FANUC Corporation provide robotic machinery for weapons production lines, including for IAI, Elbit Systems and Lockheed Martin.[73] Shipping companies such as Danish A.P. Moller – Maersk A/S transport components, parts, weapons and raw materials, sustaining a steady flow of US-supplied military equipment post-October 2023.[74]
35. For Israeli companies like Elbit and IAI, the ongoing genocide has been a profitable venture. The 65 per cent surge in Israel’s military spending from 2023 to 2024 – amounting to $46.5 billion,[75] one of the highest per capita worldwide – generated a sharp surge in their annual profits.[76] Foreign arms companies, especially the producers of munitions and ordnance, also profit.[77]
Surveillance and carcerality: The dark side of the “Start-up Nation”
36. Repression of Palestinians has become progressively automated, with tech companies providing dual-use[78] infrastructure to integrate mass data collection and surveillance, while profiting from the unique testing ground for military technology offered by the occupied Palestinian territory.[79] Fuelled by US-tech giants establishing subsidiaries and research and development centres in Israel,[80] Israel’s claims of security needs have spurred unparalleled developments in carceral and surveillance services, from CCTV networks, biometric surveillance, high-tech checkpoints networks, “smart walls” and drone surveillance, to cloud computing, artificial intelligence and data analytics supporting on-the-ground military personnel.[81]
37. Israeli tech firms often grow out of military infrastructure and strategy,[82] as did NSO Group, founded by ex-Unit 8200 members.[83] Its Pegasus spyware, designed for covert smartphone surveillance, has been used against Palestinian activists[84] and licensed globally to target leaders, journalists and human rights defenders.[85] Exported under the Defense Export Control Law, NSO group surveillance technology enables “spyware diplomacy” while reinforcing state impunity.[86]
38. IBM has operated in Israel since 1972, training military/intelligence personnel – especially from Unit 8200 – for the tech sector and start-up scene.[87] Since 2019, IBM Israel has operated and upgraded the central database of the Population, Immigration and Borders Authority (PIBA),[88] enabling collection, storage and governmental use of biometric data on Palestinians, and supporting Israel’s discriminatory permit regime.[89] Before IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprises (HPE)[90] maintained this database and its Israeli subsidiary still provides servers during the transition.[91] HP has long enabled Israel’s apartheid systems, supplying technology to COGAT, the prison service and police.[92] Since HP’s 2015 split into HPE and HP Inc., opaque business structures have obscured the roles of their seven remaining Israeli subsidiaries.[93]
39. Microsoft has been active in Israel since 1991, developing its largest centre outside the US.[94] Its technologies are embedded in the prison service, police, universities and schools – including in colonies.[95] Since 2003, Microsoft has integrated its systems and civilian tech across the Israeli military,[96] while acquiring Israeli cybersecurity and surveillance start-ups.[97]
40. As Israel’s apartheid, military and population-control systems generate increasing volumes of data, its reliance on cloud storage and computing has grown. In 2021, Israel awarded Alphabet Inc (Google) and Amazon.com Inc. a $1.2 billion contract (Project Nimbus)[98] – largely funded through Ministry of Defense expenditure[99] – to provide core tech infrastructure.
41. Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon grant Israel virtually government-wide access to their cloud and AI technologies, enhancing data processing, decision-making and surveillance/analysis capacities.[100] In October 2023, when Israel’s internal military cloud overloaded,[101] Microsoft Azure and Project Nimbus Consortium stepped in with critical cloud and AI infrastructure.[102] Their Israel-located servers ensure data sovereignty and a shield from accountability,[103] under favourable contracts offering minimal restrictions or oversight.[104] In July 2024, an Israeli colonel described cloud tech as “a weapon in every sense of the word”, citing these companies.[105]
42. The Israeli military has developed AI systems like “Lavender”, “Gospel” and “Where’s Daddy?” to process data and generate lists of targets,[106] reshaping modern warfare and illustrating AI’s dual-use nature. Palantir Technology Inc., whose tech collaboration with Israel long predates October 2023, expanded its support to the Israeli military post-October 2023.[107] There are reasonable grounds to believe Palantir has provided automatic predictive policing technology, core defence infrastructure for rapid and scaled-up construction and deployment of military software, and its Artificial Intelligence Platform, which allows real-time battlefield data integration for automated decision-making.[108] In January 2024, Palantir announced a new strategic partnership with Israel and held a board meeting in Tel Aviv “in solidarity”;[109] in April 2025, Palantir’s CEO responded to accusations that Palantir had killed Palestinians in Gaza by saying, “mostly terrorists, that’s true”.[110] Both incidents are indicative of executive-level knowledge and purpose vis-à-vis Israel’s unlawful use of force, and failure to prevent such acts or withdraw involvement.[111]
43. Israel as “Start-up Nation”, incentivized by the post-9/11 global securitization boom, has received a significant boost through the genocide. It ranked first globally for the number of start-ups per capita, with a 143 per cent growth in military tech start-ups in 2024, and with tech comprising 64 per cent of Israeli exports throughout the genocide.[112]
Civilian guise: Heavy machinery in service of settler-colonial destruction
44. Civilian technologies have long served as dual-use tools of settler-colonial occupation.[113] Israeli military operations heavily rely on equipment from leading global manufacturers to unground Palestinians from their land,[114] demolishing homes, public buildings, farmland, roads and other vital infrastructure. Since October 2023, this machinery has been integral to damaging and destroying 70 per cent of structures and 81 per cent of cropland in Gaza.[115]
45. For decades, Caterpillar Inc.[116] has provided Israel with equipment used to demolish Palestinian homes and infrastructure,[117] through both the US Foreign Military Financing programme[118] and an exclusive licensee requisitioned by Israeli law into the military.[119] In partnership with companies like IAI,[120] Elbit Systems[121] and Leonardo-owned RADA Electronic Industries,[122] Israel has evolved Caterpillar’s D9 bulldozer into automated, remote-commanded core weaponry of the Israeli military,[123] deployed in almost every military activity since 2000, clearing incursion lines, “neutralizing” the territory and killing Palestinians.[124] Since October 2023, Caterpillar equipment has been documented in use carrying out mass demolitions[125] – including of homes,[126] mosques[127] and life-sustaining infrastructure[128] – raid hospitals[129] and crushing Palestinians to death.[130] In 2025, Caterpillar secured a further multi-million dollar contract with Israel.[131]
46. Korean HD Hyundai[132] and its partially-owned subsidiary, Doosan,[133] alongside Swedish Volvo Group[134] and other major heavy machinery manufacturers, have long been linked to destruction of Palestinian property, each supplying equipment through exclusively licensed Israeli dealers.[135] Volvo’s licensee is a United Nations Database-listed company and its business partner in Merkavim Transport Pty Ltd, which produces armoured buses servicing colonies.[136] Since 2000, Volvo machinery has been used to raze Palestinian areas, including in east Jerusalem[137] and Masafer Yatta.[138] For over a decade, HD Hyundai machinery has been used to demolish Palestinian homes[139] and raze farmland, including olive groves.[140] After October 2023, Israel increased use of their equipment in the urban destruction of Gaza,[141] including flattening Rafah[142] and Jabalia,[143] after which the military obscured their logos.[144]
47. These companies have continued supplying the Israeli market despite abundant evidence of Israel’s criminal use of this machinery and repeated calls from human rights groups to sever ties.[145] Passive suppliers become deliberate contributors to a system of displacement.
B. Replacement
48. As corporate actors have contributed to the destruction of Palestinian life in the occupied Palestinian territory, they have also helped construction of what replaces it: building colonies and their infrastructure, extracting and trading materials, energy and agricultural products, bringing visitors to colonies as if to a regular holiday destination. Post-October 2023, these activities have sustained unprecedented growth in the settlement enterprise, with corporate entities continuing to power and profit from the creation of conditions of life calculated to destroy the Palestinian population, including through the near-total shutdown of water, electricity and fuel.
Home on stolen land
49. More than 371 colonies and illegal outposts have been built, powered and traded with by companies facilitating Israel’s replacement of the Indigenous population in the occupied Palestinian territory.[146] In 2024, this intensified after administration of colonies moved from military to civilian government and the Ministry of Construction and Housing budget doubled, including $200 million for colony construction.[147] From November 2023 to October 2024, Israel established 57 new colonies and outposts,[148] with Israeli and international companies supplying machinery, raw materials and logistical support.
50. Caterpillar, HD Hyundai and Volvo excavators and heavy equipment have been used in the construction of illegal colonies for at least 10 years.[149] The German Heidelberg Materials AG,[150] through its subsidiary Hanson Israel, has contributed to pillage millions of tons of dolomite rock from the Nahal Raba quarry on land seized from Palestinian villages in the West Bank.[151] In 2018, Hanson Israel won a public tender to supply materials from that quarry for colony construction,[152] and has since nearly exhausted the quarry, prompting ongoing expansion requests.[153]
51. Various companies contributed to develop roads and public transport infrastructure critical to establishing and expanding the colonies, and connecting them to Israel while excluding and segregating Palestinians.[154] Spanish/Basque Construcciones Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles[155] joined a consortium with a UN Database-listed company to maintain and expand the Jerusalem Light Rail “Red Line” and build the new “Green Line”,[156] at a time when other companies had withdrawn due to international pressure.[157] These lines include 27 kilometres of new tracks and 53 new stations in the West Bank, connecting colonies with West Jerusalem.[158] Doosan and Volvo excavators and machinery have been used,[159] and Heidelberg’s subsidiary supplied materials for a light-rail bridge.[160]
52. Real estate companies sell properties in colonies to Israeli and international buyers. Global real estate group, Keller Williams Realty LLC, through its Israeli franchisee KW Israel,[161] has had branches based in the colonies.[162] In March 2024, Keller Williams, via another franchisee, Home in Israel,[163] ran a real estate roadshow in the US and Canada,[164] co-sponsored by several companies developing and marketing thousands of apartments in colonies.[165]
The grip on natural resources: the incubator of conditions of life calculated to destroy
53. Since 1967, Israel has exercised systematic control over Palestinian natural resources, building infrastructure that integrated its colonies into Israeli national systems and entrenched Palestinian dependency on them.
54. When Israeli Defence Minister Gallant ordered a “complete siege” on Gaza on 9 October 2023, instantly cutting off water, electricity and fuel, this engineered dependency – designed to displace and control life – was operationalized for genocide.[166] Those supplies have never been fully restored, contributing to the deliberate creation of conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of Palestinians as a group.[167] This is also why the grip on resources in the West Bank – tightened after October 2023 – cannot be viewed in isolation from the destruction unfolding in Gaza.[168]
Water
55. Israel forces Palestinians to purchase water sourced from two major aquifers in their own territory, at inflated prices and with intermittent supply.[169] The Israeli national water company Mekorot has a water monopoly in the occupied Palestinian territory.[170] In Gaza, more than 97 percent of water from a coastal aquifer is contaminated, making residents dependent on Mekorot pipelines for most of their drinking water.[171] For at least the first six months post-October 2023, Mekorot ran its Gaza pipelines at 22 percent capacity, leaving areas such as Gaza City without water 95 percent of the time,[172] actively aiding the transformation of water into a tool of genocide.[173]
Electricity, gas and fuel
56. International energy companies have fuelled Israel’s energy-intensive genocide. Reliant on fuel and coal imports,[174] Israel maintains an integrated energy infrastructure serving both Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, seamlessly powering illegal settlers while controlling and obstructing Palestinian access.[175] Gaza’s power plant provided just 17 percent of Gaza’s electricity, leaving it heavily reliant on fuel for generators and Israeli supply lines.[176] Since October 2023, Israel has cut energy to most of Gaza.[177] Without electricity or fuel, most water pumps,[178] hospitals[179] and transport reached the brink of total collapse;[180] sewage overflows caused polio to resurge;[181] vital desalination plants were forced to shut down.[182]
57. Drummond Company Inc. and Swiss Glencore plc are the primary suppliers of coal for electricity to Israel, originating primarily from Colombia (i.e., 60 per cent of Israel’s imports in 2023).[183] Their respective subsidiaries own the mines and the three ports that have delivered 15 coal shipments to Israel since October 2023,[184] including six shipments after Colombia suspended coal exports to Israel in August 2024.[185] Glencore was also involved in shipments from South Africa,[186] which accounted for 15 per cent of Israeli coal imports in 2023 and continuing in 2024.[187]
58. US Chevron Corporation, in consortium with Israeli NewMedEnergy (a subsidiary of UN Database-listed Delek Group), extracts natural gas from the Leviathan and Tamar fields,[188] paying the Israeli government $453 million in royalties and taxes in 2023.[189] Chevron’s consortium supplies more than 70 per cent of Israeli domestic natural gas consumption.[190] Chevron also profits from its part-ownership of the East Mediterranean Gas (EMG) pipeline, which passes through Palestinian maritime territory,[191] and from gas export sales to Egypt and Jordan.[192] The Gaza naval blockade is connected to Israel securing the Tamar gas supply and EMG pipeline.[193] At a time of increasing brutality, British BP p.l.c. is expanding involvement in the Israeli economy, with exploration licences confirmed in March 2025, which allow BP to explore Palestinian maritime expanses illegally exploited by Israel.[194]
59. BP and Chevron are also the largest contributors to Israeli imports of crude oil, as the major owners of the strategic Azeri Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline[195] and the Kazakh Caspian Pipeline Consortium[196] respectively, as well as their associated oil fields.[197] Each conglomerate effectively supplied eight per cent of Israeli crude oil since October 2023,[198] supplemented by crude oil shipments from Brazilian oil fields, in which Petrobras holds the largest stakes,[199] and military jet fuel.[200] Oil from these companies supplies two refineries in Israel. From Haifa Refinery, two United Nations Database-listed companies supply their petrol stations throughout Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, including the colonies,[201] and the military via government-awarded contract.[202] From Ashdod Refinery, a subsidiary of UN Database-listed company Paz Retail and Energy Ltd provides jet fuel to the Israeli Air Force operating in Gaza.[203]
60. By supplying Israel with coal, gas, oil and fuel, companies are contributing to civilian infrastructures that Israel uses to entrench permanent annexation and weaponises in the destruction of Palestinian life. The same infrastructure services the Israeli military while it obliterates Gaza, including the network supplying the resources that these companies have provided.[204] The ostensibly civilian nature of such infrastructure does not exonerate a company of responsibility.[205]
Trading the fruits of illegality
Agribusiness
61. Agribusiness has thrived on Israel-led extractivism and land-grabbing – producing goods and technologies serving Israeli settler-colonial interests, expanding market dominance and attracting global investment – while erasing Palestinian food systems and accelerating displacement.[206]
62. Tnuva, Israel’s largest food conglomerate, now majority-owned by Chinese Bright Dairy & Food Co. Ltd,[207] has fuelled and benefitted from land dispossession. Tnuva’s chairman recognized that “agriculture … in general and dairy farming in particular are a strategic resource and a significant pillar in the settlement enterprise”.[208] Israel has used Kibbutzim and agricultural outposts to seize Palestinian land and replace Palestinians.[209] Companies like Tnuva help by sourcing products from these colonies,[210] then exploit the resulting captive Palestinian market[211] to build market dominance.[212] Palestinian dependence on the Israeli dairy industry has increased 160 percent in the decade following Israel’s estimated $43 million destruction of Gaza’s dairy industry in 2014.[213] Tnuva has absorbed the loss of the Gaza market,[214] failing to use its substantial leverage to influence the situation.
63. Netafim, a global leader in drip irrigation technology, now 80 percent owned by Mexico’s Orbia Advance Corporation,[215] has designed its agri-tech in concert with Israel’s expansion imperatives.[216] While maintaining a global image of sustainability,[217] Netafim technology has enabled intensive exploitation of water and land in the West Bank,[218] further depleting Palestinian natural resources, while being refined in collaboration with Israeli military-tech firms.[219] In the Jordan Valley, Netafim-aided irrigation systems have facilitated Israeli crop expansion, while Palestinian farmers – denied water and with 93 per cent unirrigated land[220] – are pushed out, unable to compete with Israeli production.[221] Furthermore, such irrigation techniques threaten to exhaust the Jordan River and Dead Sea.[222]
64. Companies such as Tnuva and Netafim continue to manufacture food security for Israelis,[223] while the food system to which they belong causes food insecurity – and even famine – for others. Netafim brands itself as a sustainable innovator, while perfecting age-old techniques of colonial exploitation.
Global retail
65. Israeli products, including those from colonies, flood global markets via major retailers,[224] often with no scrutiny. To dodge growing backlash, companies mask origin through misleading labels, barcodes and supply chain mixing, effectively making occupation shelf-ready.[225]
66. Global logistics giants like A.P. Moller – Maersk A/S are integral to this ecosystem, shipping goods from illegal settlements and UN database-listed companies straight to the US[226] and other markets.
67. In many countries, no distinction is made between products from Israel and those from its colonies. Even in the EU, where labeling is required,[227] these goods are still allowed on the market, the responsibility put on uninformed consumers.[228] Given the illegality of the colonies under international law, these products should not be traded at all.
68. Supermarket chains,[229] including many listed on the UN Database, and e-commerce platforms like Amazon.com[230] operate directly in colonies, sustaining their economy, enabling expansion and participating in apartheid through discriminatory service delivery.
Occupation Tourism
69. Major online travel platforms used by millions to e-reserve accommodation, profit from the occupation by selling tourism that sustains the colonies, excludes Palestinians, promotes settler narratives and legitimizes annexation.
70. Booking Holdings Inc. and Airbnb, Inc. let properties and hotel rooms in Israeli colonies. Booking.com has more than doubled its listings – from 26 in 2018[231] to 70 by May 2023[232] – and tripled its east Jerusalem listings to 39 in the year post-October 2023.[233] Airbnb has also amplified its colonial profiteering, growing from 139 listings in 2016[234] to 350 in 2025,[235] collecting up to 23 percent commission.[236] These listings are linked with restricting Palestinian access to land and endangering nearby villages.[237] In Tekoa, Airbnb enables settler promotion of a “warm and loving community,”[238] whitewashing settler violence against the neighbouring Palestinian village of Tuqu’.[239]
71. Booking.com and Airbnb have been on the UN Database since 2020. Booking.com may label properties as “Palestinian territory, Israeli settlement”, but it continues to profit from the colonies and faces criminal complaints in the Netherlands for laundering proceeds.[240] Airbnb briefly delisted illegal colony properties in 2018[241] but reversed course under pressure,[242] now donating profits to “humanitarian” causes and converting colonial profiteering into humanitarian-washing.[243]
C. Enablers
72. A list of enablers – financial, research, legal, consulting, media and advertising firms[244] – long involved in sustaining the settler-colonial occupation through knowledge, narratives, skills and investment, have continued to support, profit from and normalize an economy operating in genocidal mode. This section focuses just on two key enablers: the financial and academic sectors.
Financing the violations
73. The financial sector channels critical funding to both State and corporate actors behind Israel’s occupation and apartheid, despite many companies in the sector committing to the Principles for Responsible Investment[245] and the United Nations Global Compact.[246]
74. As the main source of finance for Israel’s State budget, treasury bonds have played a critical role in funding the ongoing assault on Gaza. From 2022 to 2024, the Israeli military budget grew from 4.2 per cent to 8.3 per cent of GDP, driving the public budget into a 6.8 per cent deficit.[247] Israel funded this ballooning budget by increasing its bond issuance, including $8 billion in March 2024[248] and $5 billion in February 2025,[249] alongside issuances on its domestic shekel market.[250] Some of the world’s largest banks, including BNP Paribas[251] and Barclays,[252] stepped in to boost market confidence by underwriting these international and domestic treasury bonds, allowing Israel to contain the interest rate premium, despite a credit downgrade.[253] Asset management firms – including Blackrock ($68 million), Vanguard ($546 million) and Allianz’s asset management subsidiary PIMCO ($960 million)[254] – were among at least 400 investors from 36 countries who purchased them.[255] Meanwhile, the Development Corporation for Israel (DCI) (i.e., Israel Bonds)[256] provides a bond solicitation service for the Israeli government for overseas private individuals and other investors.[257] DCI tripled its annual bond sales to funnel nearly $5 billion to Israel since October 2023,[258] while offering investors the option of sending the return on bond investments into charitable organizations supporting the Israeli military[259] and the colonies.[260]
75. These financial entities channel billions of dollars into treasury bonds and companies directly involved in Israel’s occupation and genocide. Blackrock (and its subsidiary, iShares[261]) and Vanguard are among the largest institutional investors in many companies, holding these shares for distribution among their indexes of mutual funds and electronically traded funds (ETFs). Blackrock is the second largest institutional investor in Palantir (8.6 per cent), Microsoft (7.8 per cent), Amazon.com (6.6 per cent), Alphabet (6.6 per cent) and IBM (8.6 per cent), and third largest in Lockheed Martin (7.2 per cent) and Caterpillar (7.5 per cent); Vanguard is the largest institutional investor in Caterpillar (9.8 per cent), Chevron (8.9 per cent) and Palantir (9.1 per cent), and second largest in Lockheed Martin (9.2 per cent) and Elbit Systems (2.0 per cent).[262] Through their asset management, while implicating universities, pension funds and ordinary people who passively invest their savings through the purchase of their funds and ETFs.[263] For their investment decisions, these companies often rely on benchmark indices, such as FTSE All-World ex-US, J.P. MORGAN $ EM CORP BOND UCITS and MSCI ACWI UCITS,[264] which are developed by financial services firms.
76. Global insurance companies, including Allianz and AXA, also invest large sums in shares and bonds implicated in the occupation and genocide, partly as capital reserves for policyholder claims and regulatory requirements, but primarily to generate returns. Allianz holds at least $7.3 billion[265] and AXA, despite some divestment decisions,[266] still invests at least $4.09 billion[267] in tracked companies named in this report. Their insurance policies also underwrite the risks other companies necessarily take when operating in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, thus enabling the commission of human rights abuses[268] and “de-risking” their operational environment.[269]
77. Sovereign wealth and pension funds are also significant financiers. The world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG), claims it has the “world’s most comprehensive ethical guidelines”.[270] After October 2023, GPFG increased its investment in Israeli companies by 32 per cent to $1.9 billion. By the end of 2024, the GPFG had $121.5 billion – 6.9 per cent of its total value – invested in companies named in this report alone.[271] The Caisse de Dépôt et Placement du Québec, which manages CA$473.3 billion ($328.9 billion)[272] in pension funds of six million Canadians, has almost CA$9.6 billion ($6.67 billion) invested in the companies named in this report,[273] despite its ethical investment and human rights policy.[274] In 2023–2024, it almost tripled investment in Lockheed Martin, quadrupled investment in Caterpillar and increased 10-fold the investment in HD Hyundai.[275]
78. The financial sector also allows companies to access funds through loans and by underwriting their debts so they can sell it on the private bond market. From 2021 to 2023, BNP Paribas was a top European financier of the weapons industry supplying Israel, providing $410 million in loans to Leonardo, among others,[276] alongside $5.2 billion in loans and underwriting for United Nations Database-listed companies.[277] Similarly, in 2024, Barclays provided $2 billion in loans and underwriting to United Nations Database-listed companies,[278] $862 million to Lockheed Martin and $228 million to Leonardo.[279]
79. This direct investment is buttressed by the choice of financial advisory companies and responsible investment associations to not consider human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territory in their assessment of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing.[280] This allows responsible/ethical investment funds to remain ESG compliant despite investing in Israeli government bonds and in shares of companies involved in violations in the occupied Palestinian territory.[281]
80. This entire environment has facilitated a record 179 per cent increase in $-equivalent equity prices of the companies listed in the Tel Aviv stock exchange since the start of the assault on Gaza, translating into a $157.9 billion gain.[282]
81. Faith-based charities have also become key financial enablers of illegal projects, including in the occupied Palestinian territory, often receiving tax deductions abroad despite strict regulatory charitable frameworks.[283] The Jewish National Fund (KKL-JNF) and its 20+ affiliates fund settler expansion and military-linked projects.[284] Since October 2023, platforms such as Israel Gives have enabled tax-deductible crowdfunding in 32 countries for Israeli military units and settlers.[285] United States-based Christian Friends of Israeli Communities,[286] Dutch Christians for Israel[287] and global affiliates,[288] sent over $12.25 million in 2023[289] to various projects that support colonies, including some that train extremist settlers.[290]
Knowledge production and violation legitimization
82. In Israel, universities – particularly law schools,[291] archaeology[292] and Middle Eastern studies departments[293] – contribute to the ideological scaffolding of apartheid, cultivating State-aligned narratives,[294] erasing Palestinian history and justifying occupation practices.[295] Meanwhile, science and technology departments serve as research and development hubs for collaborations between the Israeli military and arms contractors, including Elbit Systems, IAI, IBM and Lockheed Martin, and so contribute to producing the tools for surveillance, crowd control, urban warfare, facial recognition and targeted killing, tools that are effectively tested on Palestinians.[296]
83. Leading universities, especially from the Global Minority, partner with Israeli institutions in areas directly harming Palestinians. At MIT, labs conduct weapons and surveillance research funded by the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) – the only foreign military financing MIT research.[297] Notable IMOD-projects include drone swarm control[298] – a distinct feature of the Israeli assault on Gaza since October 2023 – pursuit algorithms,[299] and underwater surveillance.[300] From 2019 to 2024, MIT managed a Lockheed Martin Seed Fund connecting students to teams in Israel.[301] From 2017 to 2025, Elbit Systems paid for membership to MIT’s Industrial Liaison Program, enabling access to research and talent.[302]
84. The European Commission (EC)’s Horizon Europe programme actively facilitates collaboration with Israeli institutions, including those complicit in apartheid and genocide. Since 2014, the EC has granted over €2.12 billion ($2.4 billion) to Israeli entities,[303] including the Ministry of Defense,[304] while European academic institutions both benefit from and reinforce this entanglement. The Technical University of Munich (TUM) receives €198.5 million ($218 million) in EC Horizon funding,[305] including €11.47 million ($12.6 million) for 22 collaborations with Israeli partners, military and tech firms.[306] TUM and IAI receive €792,795.75 ($868,416) to co-develop green hydrogen refuelling,[307] technology relevant to IAI military drones used in Gaza.[308] TUM partners with IBM Israel – which runs the discriminatory Israeli Population Registry – on cloud and AI systems, as part of IBM Israel’s €7.02 million ($7.71 million) Horizon funding.[309] TUM also collaborates on a €10.76 million ($11.71 million) project called “seamless urban mobility” that includes the Municipality of Jerusalem,[310] a city entrenching annexation through urban transportation. It is impossible to disentangle the expertise Israeli partners contribute to these partnerships from that gained and used in violations to which they are connected.
85. Many universities have upheld ties with Israel despite the post-October 2023 escalation. One of many British examples,[311] the University of Edinburgh holds nearly £25.5 million ($31.72 million) (2.5 per cent of its endowment) in four tech giants – Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and IBM – central to Israel’s surveillance apparatus and the ongoing Gaza destruction.[312] With both direct and indexed investments, it ranks among the UK’s most financially entangled institutions. The University also partners with firms aiding Israeli military operations, including Leonardo S.p.A.[313] and Ben Gurion University via an AI and Data Science Lab,[314] sharing research that directly links it with assaults on Palestinians.
86. This analysis only scratches the surface of the information received by the Special Rapporteur, who acknowledges the vital work of students and staff in holding universities to account. It casts a new light onto global crackdowns on campus protesters: shielding Israel and protecting institutional financial interests appears a more probable motivation than fighting alleged antisemitism.[315]
Conclusions
87. While life in Gaza is being obliterated and the West Bank is under escalating assault, this report shows why Israel’s genocide continues: because it is lucrative for many. By shedding light on the political economy of an occupation turned genocidal, the report reveals how the forever-occupation has become the ideal testing ground for arms manufacturers and Big Tech – providing boundless supply and demand, little oversight, and zero accountability – while investors and private and public institutions profit freely. Too many influential corporate entities remain inextricably financially bound to Israel’s apartheid and militarism.
88. Post-October 2023, when the Israeli defence budget doubled, and at a time of falling demand, production and consumer confidence, an international network of corporations has propped up the Israeli economy. Blackrock and Vanguard rank among the largest investors in arms companies pivotal to Israel’s genocidal arsenal. Major global banks have underwritten Israeli treasury bonds, which have bankrolled the devastation, and the largest sovereign wealth and pension funds invested public and private savings in the genocidal economy, all the while claiming to respect ethical guidelines.
89. Arms companies have turned over near record profits by equipping Israel with cutting-edge weaponry that has obliterated a virtually defenceless civilian population. The machinery of global construction equipment giants has been instrumental in razing Gaza to the ground, preventing the return and reconstitution of Palestinian life. Extractive energy and mining conglomerates, while providing sources of civilian energy, have fuelled Israel’s military and energy infrastructures – both used to create conditions of life calculated to destroy the Palestinian people.
90. And while the genocide rages on, the inexorable process of violent annexation continues. Agribusiness still sustains expansion of the settlement enterprise. The largest online tourism platforms continue normalizing the illegality of Israeli colonies. Global supermarkets continue to stock Israeli settlement products. And universities worldwide, under the guise of research neutrality, continue to profit from an economy now operating in genocidal mode. Indeed, they are structurally dependent on settler-colonial collaborations and funding.
91. Business continues as usual, but nothing about this system, in which businesses are integral, is neutral. The enduring ideological, political and economic engine of racial capitalism has transformed Israel’s displacement-replacement economy of occupation into an economy of genocide. This is a “joint criminal enterprise”,[316] where the acts of one ultimately contribute to a whole economy that drives, supplies and enables this genocide.
92. The entities named in the report constitute a fraction of a much deeper structure of corporate involvement, profiteering from and enabling violations and crimes in the occupied Palestinian territory. Had they exercised due diligence, corporate entities would have ceased involvement with Israel long ago. Today, the demand for accountability is all the more urgent: any investment sustains a system of serious international crimes.
93. Business and human rights obligations cannot be isolated from Israel’s illegal settler-colonial enterprise in the occupied Palestinian territory, which now functions as a genocidal machine, despite the ICJ having ordered that it be fully and unconditionally dismantled. Corporate relations with Israel must cease until the occupation and apartheid end, and reparations are made. The corporate sector, including its executives, must be held to account, as a necessary step towards ending the genocide and disassembling the global system of racialized capitalism that underpins it.
Recommendations
94. The Special Rapporteur urges Member States:
(a) To impose sanctions and a full arms embargo on Israel, including all existing agreements and dual-use items such as technology and civilian heavy machinery;
(b) To suspend/prevent all trade agreements and investment relations, – and impose sanctions, including asset freezes, on entities and individuals involved in activities that may endanger the Palestinians;
(c) To enforce accountability, ensuring that corporate entities face legal consequences for their involvement in serious violations of international law.
95. The Special Rapporteur urges corporate entities:
(a) To promptly cease all business activities and terminate relationships directly linked with, contributing to and causing human rights violations and international crimes against the Palestinian people, in accordance with international corporate responsibilities and the law of self-determination;
(b) To pay reparations to the Palestinian people, including in the form of an apartheid wealth tax along the lines of post-Apartheid South Africa.
96. The Special Rapporteur urges the International Criminal Court and national judiciaries to investigate and prosecute corporate executives and/or corporate entities for their part in the commission of international crimes and laundering of the proceeds from those crimes.
97. The Special Rapporteur urges the United Nations:
(a) To comply with the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion of 2024;
(b) To include all entities involved in Israeli unlawful occupation in the United Nations database (to be accessible on the OHCHR website).
98. The Special Rapporteur urges trade Unions, lawyers, civil society and ordinary citizens to press for boycotts, divestments, sanctions, justice for Palestine and accountability at international and domestic levels; together we can end these unspeakable crimes.
99. This report is written at the cusp of a profound and tumultuous transformation. Globally witnessed atrocities require urgent accountability and justice, which demands diplomatic, economic, and legal action against those who have maintained and profited from an economy of occupation turned genocidal. What comes next, depends on all of us.
________________________________________
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:39 pm

Part 2 of 3

Annex I
Overview of the legal framework governing the legal responsibility of corporate entities in the occupied Palestinian territory
1. Introduction
1. This annex sets out the international legal framework broadly applicable to the corporate sector implicated in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). It aims to provide guidance on the interpretation and application of the legal concepts and factual findings presented in the main report. Not intended as an exhaustive exposition of international law in this domain, it presents the broad principles of corporate responsibility, particularly those applicable where corporate entities[317] are implicated in displacing Palestinians from their land and replacing them with unlawful colonies, contrary to international law. Corporate entities risk being held responsible for exploitative, abusive and even criminal conduct. Although corporate responsibility for and criminal complicity in violations was certainly identifiable in the oPt prior to October 2023, subsequent factual and legal developments could implicate corporations in unlawful occupation and genocide.
2. Corporate responsibility under international law
2. Corporate responsibility for violations of human rights, international humanitarian law and crimes under international law is governed by legal instruments at the domestic, regional and international levels.
3. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) constitute the normative framework at the international level for the regulation of corporate conduct with respect to human rights.[318] They set out what states and corporate entities need to do in order to comply with existing obligations under international human rights law, and are already having a significant impact on national law and policy. Indeed, the UNGPs provide the normative lens through which corporate conduct can be assessed in order to establish legally relevant facts in litigation where corporate liability is addressed. They are concerned both with preventing adverse human rights impacts and ensuring remedial actions are taken where a corporation’s conduct causes, contributes, or is directly linked to such impacts.[319] Crucially, heightened normative requirements apply in contexts of conflict, occupation and structural vulnerability, especially where domestic enforcement of international human rights law may be weak or compromised, rendering international oversight necessary.[320]
4. Other areas of international law establish specific legal obligations for corporations, especially international humanitarian law – which is binding on non-State actors involved in armed conflict[321] – and international criminal law, under which individuals such as corporate executives, and increasingly corporate entities themselves, can be held criminally liable.[322] Domestic courts are the primary jurisdiction for the enforcement of corporate responsibility for human rights violations and international crimes.
2.1. States as the primary duty-bearers
5. International law accords States the primary role of ensuring that corporate entities do not violate international law and respect human rights, as part of their obligation to respect, protect and fulfil human rights. Under international human rights law, confirmed by the UNGPs, States may be found in breach of their human rights obligations where they fail to take appropriate steps to prevent, investigate, punish and redress abuses by private actors when human rights violations occur.[323] States have an obligation to extend this regulation and oversight to the operations of corporations that occur outside their territory, in accordance with general extraterritorial human rights obligations.[324]
6. Furthermore, under the rules on State responsibility, violations of human rights by private actors will be attributed to a State where a corporate entity acts on instructions from or under the control or direction of the State, is empowered by State legislation to exercise elements of governmental authority or where the State acknowledges and adopts the conduct as its own.[325] Accordingly, the UNGPs require States to take additional steps to protect against human rights abuse by corporate entities owned, controlled by or receiving substantial support from the State.[326]
2.2. Responsibilities of corporate entities
7. The UNGPs apply to all corporate enterprises, “regardless of their size, sector, operational context, ownership and structure.”[327] The responsibility of corporate entities for human rights violations and crimes under international law exists independently from that of States and irrespective of the action States do or do not take to ensure they respect human rights. Consequently, corporations must respect human rights even if a State where they operate does not, and they may be held accountable even if they have complied with the domestic laws where they operate.[328] In other words, compliance with domestic laws does not preclude/is not a defense to responsibility or liability.
8. Corporate entities are obliged both to avoid violating human rights law and to address human rights violations resulting from their own activities or their business relationships with others. To achieve this, the UNGPs establish a “continuum of involvement” and associated responsibilities. These reflect the complexity of corporate structures and economic value chains, and the fact that the nature of a company’s involvement in a particular human rights impact may shift over time, so that if it does not take appropriate action, it could move up that continuum. The activities of a corporate entity and its relationships can be seen as part of an ecosystem, which may altogether (by perpetrating, facilitating, enabling and/or profiting) adversely impact human rights, resulting in violations.[329]
9. A corporate entity’s responsibility depends primarily on whether its activities or relationships throughout its supply/value chain[330] risk, or are in fact:
• causing human rights violations[331], due to its own activities being essential to the human rights abuse being able to occur.[332]
• contributing to violations through its own activities – either directly or through some outside entity (government, business or other). This includes any activity or relationship where a causal link can be established between the corporate entity’s actions and the resulting violation.[333] Causality between the entity’s actions and the resulting abuse will be considered to exist where it has facilitated or enabled the abuse, created strong incentives for a third party to breach international human rights law or undertaken activities “in parallel with a third party, leading to cumulative impacts”.[334]
• directly linked to violations through its operations, products, services or corporate relationships, although it need not itself be contributing to the [335]
10. The UNGPs expect corporate entities to ensure that they are not implicated in human rights violations by undertaking periodic human rights due diligence (HRDD) to identify concerns and adjust their conduct.[336] Additionally, in situations of armed conflict, occupation and other instances of widespread violence, corporate entities are expected to engage in heightened human rights due diligence throughout the period of the conflict.[337]
11. As part of this heightened process – which is imperative in the oPt – corporate entities should ask themselves three questions regarding their actions and omissions:
• Is there an actual or potential adverse impact on human rights or is the conflict connected either to the corporate entity’s activities, products or services?
• If so, do the corporate entity’s activities increase the risk of that impact?
• If so, would the corporate entity’s activities in and of themselves be sufficient to result in that impact?[338]
12. In answering these questions, corporate entities must consider:
• Conflict will always create adverse negative human rights impacts, therefore a corporate entity operating in a conflict will always cause, contribute to or be directly linked with human rights impacts;
• Corporate activities in a conflict-affected area can never be ‘neutral’; even where a corporate entity does not take sides in a conflict, its activities will inevitably affect the conflict dynamics;
• Corporate entities need to respect standards of international humanitarian law and the obligation to prevent genocide, in addition to human rights.[339]
13. Based on the above assessment, a corporate entity has particular legal responsibilities:
• Where it causes human rights violations (answers “yes” to all three questions), it has a responsibility to cease the action, and to provide remedies and reparations for harm caused.[340]
• Where it contributes to human rights violations (answers “yes” to questions 1 and 2, “no” to 3), it has a responsibility to take the necessary steps to cease or prevent its own contribution to human rights violations (including terminating relationships), to mitigate any remaining impact through its leverage and to cooperate in the remediation of the harm.[341]
• Where it is directly linked to human rights violations (answers “yes” only to question 1), it is required to use its leverage, including collaboratively, to prevent or mitigate the impact on human rights.[342] Should that leverage prove ineffective, it must consider terminating relationships.[343] Failure to disengage from a high-risk context (despite due diligence) will increase a corporate entity’s liability for the violation.[344]
14. A crucial and often misunderstood aspect of the framework is that when assessing corporate actions, it is the material impact of corporate actions on the current and potential protection of human rights and the conflict-affected context itself that matters,[345] and not the degree of diligence exercised or the degree of negligence.[346] In other words, conducting this due diligence will not absolve a corporate entity of responsibility.[347] What matters is the human rights impacts and the actions taken to avert or address the risk.
15. Correctly identifying the violation in question is therefore crucial. This means corporate entities must consider whether specific human rights violations may also be constitutive of more structural and systemic violations of international law.[348] According to the UNGPs, the severity of the human rights impacts will determine their responsibilities and the sufficiency of the steps taken to prevent, cease and remedy the serious violations.[349] For example, a corporate entity may be contributing to home demolitions and forced displacement. However, in a context of settlement expansion, or more structural crimes, the corporate entity’s actions may also be directly linked to the maintenance of apartheid, racial discrimination and genocide, or contributing to those violations, when systematic forced displacement is a constitutive component of these crimes as they unfold. They are also inherently contributing to the violation of the right to self-determination.
16. Additionally, the complexity of expected HRDD processes and the urgency with which corporate entities must act is proportional to the scale, scope and irremediability of the violations occurring.[350] In situations where there is clear evidence of ongoing, widespread human rights violations, the corporate entity must treat the risk of involvement as a legal compliance issue and, in the most extreme circumstances, cease operations in the State in question. Heightened HRDD enables corporate entities to anticipate escalations in the violations, and take the requisite action before those violations materialise.[351] Failure to do so affects the degree of involvement and the extent to which their actions will be considered sufficient, impacting liability assessments. Thus a corporate entity directly linked to home demolitions and failing to terminate its relationships will find itself contributing to that violation, carrying greater responsibilities.[352]
2.3. When responsibility may entail criminal liability
17. Failure to act responsibly in line with international law may implicate corporate entities in more serious violations giving rise to criminal liability, for the corporate entity and/or for its executives.
18. Drawn from the legacy of the Industrialists’ trials at Nuremberg,[353] corporate accountability for international crimes is based on a recognition of the critical role the economy plays in times of war and conflict,[354] and the fact that corporate entities may be involved in heinous violations of international law constituting international
19. Individual executives can be held criminally liable for the actions of their corporate entities, including before the International Criminal Court.[355] While, increasingly, corporate entities themselves, could also face criminal liability as a result of the emerging crystallization of customary international legal principles.[356] This includes some domestic jurisdictions which attribute criminal liability to corporations,[357] and a growing body of treaties enshrine criminal liability of legal persons, which means that under international law corporations can be criminally liable for specific crimes, including genocide,[358] apartheid,[359] financing terrorism,[360] organized crime[361] and corruption.[362]
20. The conduct of corporations and their executives may entail direct criminal liability but more commonly constitutes complicity or aiding and abetting liability. This may involve instigating, moral support,[363] or abetting, furnishing aid or assistance for or procuring the means for the commission of a crime[364] or the creation of conditions necessary for atrocity crimes to occur.[365] International tribunals have generally found that criminal liability for such forms of complicity: (a) can be established where the aid or assistance has a material effect on the commission of the crime,[366] and (b) depends on the knowledge possessed by the entity/executive of how its services or activities will be utilised, and the effect on the commission of the crime.[367]
21. In other words, it is not necessary to show that the entity or individual intended the particular harm; it is sufficient that in providing logistical, financial or operational support, they had actual or constructive knowledge that the principal perpetrators were engaged in a given crime,[368] or, in the case of prosecutions before the ICC, acted “for the purpose of facilitating the commission of such a crime”.[369] Financial and managerial control over a corporate entity engaged in the crime is sufficient to establish the basis for individual criminal responsibility.[370] Jurisprudence has confirmed that corporate actors cannot avoid accountability by claiming that they were merely fulfilling commercial contracts.[371]
2.4. Mechanisms of enforcement
22. This international framework is enforceable via a range of mechanisms – particularly at the domestic and regional levels – established by States in order to fulfil the legal obligations outlined in Section 1.
23. For many corporate actors a key incentive to uphold practices that respect human rights is the risk of reputational damage arising from their involvement in human rights violations and international crimes. The UN Database (see 3.1 below),[372] for instance, has significantly promoted awareness of corporate responsibility in the oPt and contributed to divestment decisions.
24. An examination of all legislative and policy mechanisms adopted by states is beyond the scope of this report. In many jurisdictions, corporate violations of jus cogens norms, customary international law, international criminal law and international human rights law are enforceable in courts, while in others domestic criminal laws, tortious and negligence laws, and contract laws provide useful mechanisms for victims. The UNGPs can and should be consistently used to provide the normative lens to assess corporate conduct and establish legally relevant facts.
25. Examples of corporate accountability for violations of international law include: in the UK for toxic emissions from a subsidiary-run copper mine,[373] in the Netherlands for the supply of nerve gas to Iraq,[374] in France for payments to armed groups to keep a cement factory running[375] and in Sweden for using the military to secure oil fields in Sudan.[376] In the US, a civil suit under the Alien Torts Statute, under which US courts can hold American corporations accountable for “violation[s] of the law of nations”,[377] led to settlement with a US oil company for its complicity in violations in Myanmar.[378]
26. Where a corporate entity profits from actions that constitute an international crime (e.g., a war crime, genocide, apartheid or an act of aggression), this may also form the predicate crime for an offence under money laundering and proceeds of crime legislation that exists in many domestic jurisdictions,[379] which, if successfully proven, can infect all corporate dealings along the supply chain, such as provision of insurance, tech services, legal accountancy and banking services.[380]
27. Domestic human rights due diligence laws now exist in several states, including France,[381] Germany,[382] Norway[383] and Switzerland,[384] and the number can be expected to increase across EU states following the adoption of the EU Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence in July 2024,[385] subject to proposed amendments.[386] These laws establish mechanisms for supervision and enforcement through injunctive orders and effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties.[387] They are often complemented by regulations applicable to particular sectors, such as dual-use cyber-surveillance items,[388] forced labour[389] and non-financial reporting entities.[390]
28. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct have opened new opportunities for scrutiny.[391] These require all 51 adhering States, including Israel,[392] to establish National Contact Points (NCPs) to promote the guidelines and create a non-judicial grievance mechanism allowing NGOs, trade unions, affected individuals and communities to lodge complaints about the direct operations or supply chains of companies operating in or from an OECD-country,[393] and to receive a mediated outcome or final determination with recommendations.[394]
29. Where direct remedies are not available against corporate entities, it may be possible to hold States responsible for failing to comply with their obligations vis-a-vis corporate entities within their jurisdiction.[395]
3. Applying the framework to the occupied Palestinian territory
30. In the case of the oPt, corporate entities have been on notice for decades regarding the widespread and systematic nature of the human rights violations perpetrated Proper human rights due diligence would have identified the risk of corporate entities incurring responsibility for such violations well before the catastrophic events that have unfolded since October 2023 – all the more so if the required heightened processes were followed.
3.1. An inherently unlawful context, gradually exposed
31. Since 1967, Palestinian and Israeli human rights groups,[396] the United Nations main organs[397] as well as UN treaty bodies,[398] special rapporteurs,[399] investigative committees[400] and major international NGOs – including Human Rights Watch,[401] Amnesty International,[402] Save the Children[403] and Oxfam[404] – have systematically documented the Israeli occupation’s many violations, including the economic structures that sustain it.
32. In its 2004 Advisory Opinion, the ICJ found that Israel’s construction of the Wall in the West Bank, including east Jerusalem, violated peremptory norms of international law, including the right to self-determination, the prohibition on annexation and obligations under international humanitarian and human rights law, including the crime of forced displacement.[405]
33. The 2004 Advisory Opinion laid the foundation for civil society responses such as the BDS campaign[406] and initiatives by other actors[407] who have mobilized around the principle that those who profit from occupation should be held accountable. In response to mounting pressure, as well as internal risk assessments and strategic considerations, several companies have taken action. Some corporations have divested – for example, KLP from Caterpillar,[408] Irish Strategic Investment Fund from six Israeli companies[409] and AXA from five Israeli banks and Elbit Systems[410] – or have withdrawn their operations from the Israeli market, as have Veolia,[411] CRH,[412] General Mills,[413] G4S,[414] Yokohama[415] and Pret a Manger,[416] and Ben & Jerrys continues to fight to implement its decision to withdraw sales to colonies against efforts of its parent company Unilever.[417] In the sports sector, sustained advocacy led Adidas, PUMA, and Erreà to end their sponsorship of the Israel Football Association.[418]
34. In 2016, the UN Human Rights Council adopted resolution A/HRC/RES/31/36, pursuant to which the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights established a database in 2020 (‘UN database’) listing business enterprises that have “directly and indirectly enabled, facilitated and profited from the construction and growth of the settlements”, identifying ten specific types of activities.[419] Its most recent iteration, updated in 2023, lists 97 companies.[420] While it does not cover the full gamut of relevant activities, the database captures critical components of the complex matrix of corporate entities involved in the displacement and replacement of the Palestinians.
3.2. Seismic shift: international court proceedings
35. Recent legal developments concerning the oPt have significantly reshaped the assessment of corporate responsibility and potential liability.
36. Most significant is the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024, which addressed the legality of Israel’s very presence in the oPt. The Court declared the prolonged presence of Israel in the whole of the territory, including its colony regime – composed of its military presence, settlements, associated infrastructures and control of Palestinian natural resources[421] – as illegal[422] in its entirety on the basis of sustained violations of two peremptory norms of international law: the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people and the prohibition on the acquisition of territory by force (annexation).[423] The Court also recognized, among others, the violation of the non-derogable norm prohibiting racial segregation and apartheid.[424]
37. The ICJ’s finding of a violation of the prohibition on the use of force effectively qualifies the occupation as an act of aggression.[425] Consequently, any dealings that support or sustain the occupation and its associated apparatus may amount to complicity in an international crime under the Rome Statute.[426] While Israel, as the de facto occupying power, remains bound by international humanitarian law, the illegality of the occupation means all administrative and military actions it undertakes in the oPt – from controlling visas, permits and movement, to incarceration and economic regulation – lack lawful authority under international law and should be considered invalid.[427]
38. Second, the recognition by the ICJ of the violation of the right to self-determination in turn informs the interpretation of all human rights and other legal obligations that flow therefrom. As the Court said, the right to self-determination is the most fundamental and existential right for all human beings, as it pertains to the inherent capability of a people to exist and determine themselves as a people in a given territory, free from foreign control and occupation.[428] Without this right, a people are unable to exercise control over their lives and resources in the territory recognized under international law as their own.[429]
39. On the basis of the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion, the UN General Assembly demanded that Israel bring to an end its unlawful presence in the oPt by 17 September 2025.[430] Until that happens, States must not provide aid or assistance or enter into economic or trade dealings, and must take steps to prevent trade or investment relations that would assist in maintaining the illegal situation created by Israel in the oPt.[431] It should be emphasized that the failure of States to act on the ICJ ruling does not absolve corporate entities of their responsibilities under international law and the UNGPs.
3.3. Atrocity crimes
40. This sustained situation of illegality with impunity, with its associated violations of international law and international crimes, has predictably given rise to further egregious violations, amounting to atrocity crimes, committed since October 2023. These have in turn precipitated the opening by the ICJ and ICC of proceedings concerning Israel: the former relating to genocide, the latter to war crimes and crimes against humanity.
41. On 26 January 2024, following the South Africa v. Israel proceedings under the Genocide Convention, the ICJ ordered Israel to take “all measures” within its power to prevent genocidal acts against Palestinians,[432] and in May 2024, the Court ordered Israel to “immediately halt” military operations that may bring about conditions of life intended to destroy.[433] In separate proceedings, Nicaragua v Germany, the ICJ reminded all States “of their international obligations relating to the transfer of arms[434] to parties to an armed conflict, in order to avoid the risk that such arms might be used to violate” international law.[435]
42. By placing States on explicit notice of this risk of genocide, the ICJ orders engaged the obligation under Article 1 of the Genocide Convention to “prevent and punish” genocide, thereby exposing all those who continue to aid, abet or assist Israel in committing such acts to potential international responsibility for complicity in genocide.
43. In November 2024, the ICC issued arrest warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, on the basis that there are reasonable grounds to believe that they bear criminal responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
3.4. Consequences for corporate entities
44. The above legal developments have significantly reshaped the assessment of corporate responsibility and potential liability, which must now be interpreted in light of these orders and decisions of international courts.
45. The scale and severity of violations occurring throughout Israel’s decades-long military occupation – which has helped entrench a settler-colonial apartheid regime – should already have alerted corporate actors to their responsibility to avoid causing, contributing to or being directly linked to ongoing human rights violations, and the possibility that they may have been complicit in the commission of international crimes, such as by aiding and abetting and facilitating them. The political economy of Israel’s occupation set out in the report, is illustrative of the entwinement of all manner of corporate activities with the displacement and replacement of Palestinians in the oPt. At a minimum, this directly linked these corporate activities with an entrenched and structural set of violations that almost certainly already triggered the responsibility of corporate entities to cease engagement linked to the oPt under the UNGPs, on the basis of their limited capacity to wield influence in order to prevent or mitigate the adverse impact. But the recent and ongoing ICJ and ICC proceedings have removed any possible doubt and put corporate entities – whether subsidiaries, parent companies or direct actors and investors – clearly on notice of the serious risk of being implicated in very serious violations of international law, including human rights violations and international crimes, and of their actions having contributed to or become criminally complicit in these violations and crimes.
46. Israel’s ongoing illegal occupation of the oPt creates an untenable situation for corporate entities to simply continue business as usual. The finding that the occupation is per se illegal, and that international crimes, including genocide, and arguably the crime of aggression, may have been committed, has gone far beyond a “heightened risk” of adverse human rights impact. The private sector must, in its own interests, urgently reconsider all engagement connected to Israel’s economy of occupation and now genocide.
47. A consequence of the ICJ Advisory Opinion is a requirement for heightened human rights due diligence on the part of corporate entities, which must now address the fundamental illegality at the heart of Israel’s enterprise. They can no longer limit their legal assessments and mitigation measures to questions of Israel’s specific conduct and whether certain human rights (e.g., environmental, workers’ or children’s rights or lack of fair trial guarantees) and humanitarian frameworks are respected.[436] For example, the incarceration of thousands of Palestinians, whether in administrative detention or after being convicted in military courts, is unlawful due to the lack of legal authority and because it is part of a governance system using mass incarceration of Palestinians as a tool of systemic repression and forced displacement, and not merely due to the absence of fair trial guarantees. The Advisory Opinion also signals that corporate entities must recognize the primacy of the right to self-determination and its interpretive function in the construction of all other human rights protections.[437] This means Human Rights Policies and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks cannot continue to overlook the right to self-determination, which is firmly embedded within human rights law,[438] recognized as a foundational right of all peoples, and the prerequisite to all other rights.[439]
48. It also means recognizing that any engagement with Palestinians and in the oPt must comply with their right to self-determination. This supersedes paternalistic justifications based on the fiduciary obligations of the occupying power under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and invalidates specious justifications by corporate entities, such as that an investment through Israel as the occupier can eventually benefit the Palestinians as well, or that divestment would have adverse human rights impacts.[440]
49. The ICJ Advisory Opinion, endorsed by the UN General Assembly, imposes a prima facie responsibility on corporate entities to not engage and/or to withdraw totally and unconditionally from any dealings with any component of the occupation. Where corporate entities disregard this notice, fail to abide by their responsibilities under the UNGPs and continue engagement through their activities and relationships with Israel, its economy, its military and private sector connected to the oPt, they knowingly contribute to or cause violations, including the denial of the Palestinian right to self-determination, the permanent annexation of Palestinian territory or the maintenance of Israel’s unlawful occupation of Palestinian territory.
50. Worse, this is a political economy that was always eliminatory and has now turned into genocidal mode. Confirming this, the ICJ Provisional Measures and ICC Arrest Warrants signal the risk that corporate entities – and their executives – that engage in the oPt are implicated in serious international crimes. Any decision to continue engagement in Israel’s economy is therefore done with knowledge of the crimes that may be taking place, and of the fact that they may provide material support to Israel to continue to commit those crimes.
51. Corporate entities and their executives can, and indeed must, find themselves liable in civil or criminal law for such conduct, in addition to the multitude of other crimes and human rights violations that are part of the economy of occupation. The actions entities and executives do or do not take in accordance with their responsibilities, vis-a-vis these legal developments and the UNGPs, have material relevance to key evidential questions that would arise in the course of determining their civil and/or criminal liability.
________________________________________

* The present report was submitted to the conference services for processing after the deadline so as to include the most recent information.
** The annex to the present document is reproduced as received, in the language of submission only.
[1] Philip Stern, Empires Incorporated: The Corporations that Built British Colonialism (Harvard University Press, 2023); L.H. Roper, “Private Enterprise, Colonialism, and the Atlantic World”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Latin American History (2018).
[2] Nick Estes, Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance (London, Verso, 2019), pp. 43-50.
[3] Susan Koshy, et al., (eds.) Colonial Racial Capitalism (Durham: Duke University Press, 2022).
[4] Patrick Wolfe, “Purchase by Other Means: The Palestine Nakba and Zionism’s Conquest of Economics”, Settler Colonial Studies, vol. 2, No. 1 (2012).
[5] Andy Clarno, Neoliberal Apartheid: Palestine/Israel and South Africa after 1994 (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2017).
[6] http://www.unrwa.org/newsroom/official- ... eli-forces.
[7] Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Principle 4
[8] Guiding Principle 14.
[9] http://www.bdsmovement.net; http://www.whoprofits.org; http://www.dontbuyintooccupation.org; http://www.investigate.afsc.org.
[10] A/HRC/22/63, para 96; A/HRC/RES/31/36 and A/HRC/43/71.
[11] http://www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input ... tory-human.
[12] http://www.somo.nl/mind-the-gap/.
[13] D. Lustig, “The Enduring Charter”, in M.J. Durkee (eds) States, Firms and Their Legal Fictions (Cambridge University Press, 2024).
[14] Roper, “Private Enterprise”.
[15] Koshy, Colonial Racial Capitalism, p.4.
[16] Federica Violi, “Navigating Corporate Accountability in International Economic Law: A Critical Overview” in Ioannis Papadopoulos et al (eds), Handbook of Accountability Studies: Politics, Law, Business, Work (Elgar Publishing, forthcoming 2025).
[17] http://www.realbusinessrescue.co.uk/adv ... -countries.
[18] Adom Getachew, Worldmaking after Empire (Princeton University Press, 2019), pp. 22-26.
[19] Violi, “Navigating Corporate Accountability”.
[20] The I.G. Farben Trial, United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 August 1947-29 July 1948; Anita Ramasastry, “Corporate Complicity: From Nuremberg to Rangoon – An Examination of Forced Labor Cases and Their Impact on the Liability of Multinational Corporations”, Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol 20 (2002).
[21] http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/fi ... me%204.pdf, pp. 21-27.
[22] Elies van Sliedregt, “The Future of International Criminal Justice is Corporate”, Journal of International Criminal Justice (2025).
[23] https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/fil ... shr_en.pdf.
[24] http://www.undocs.org/A/75/212, para 10; A/75/212, para 11; see https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instrume ... 7_2019.pdf, pp. 81-84.
[25] Guiding principle 13.
[26] http://www.undp.org/publications/height ... exts-guide.
[27] Guiding Principle 17 commentary.
[28] ILC, Draft articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity, with commentaries, 2019, A/74/10, pp. 81-84; A/75/212, para. 11.
[29] https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/fil ... -annex.pdf.
[30] A/79/384, paras. 5-7.
[31] A/79/384, para. 8.
[32] Sai Englert and Gargi Bhattacharyya, “Capital’s genocide: a conversation on racial capitalism, settler colonialism, and possible worlds after Gaza”, Journal Of Holy Land And Palestine Studies, vol. 23, No. 2 (2024), pp. 172-175.
[33] Sherene Seikaly, Men of Capital: Scarcity and Economy in Mandate Palestine (Stanford University Press, 2016), pp. 6-8.
[34] Gershon Shafir, “Zionism and Colonialism: A Comparative Approach”, in Michael Barnett (ed), Israel in Comparative Perspective: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom (SUNY Press, 1996), pp. 234-237.
[35] http://www.kkl-jnf.org/about-kkl-jnf/kk ... -actions/; http://www.peacenow.org.il/en/settler-n ... bank-land; http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2021 ... fbefe10000.
[36] Sheila Ryan, “Israeli Economic Policy in the Occupied Areas: Foundations of a New Imperialism,” MERIP Reports, No. 24 (1974), pp. 3-28.
[37] http://www.arij.org/wp-content/uploads/ ... t_upd.pdf; http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... 077751.pdf.
[38] http://www.badil.org/phocadownloadpap/b ... ments.pdf; http://www.badil.org/cached_uploads/vie ... 021197.pdf.
[39] http://www.btselem.org/download/201105_ ... on_eng.pdf .
[40] UNCTAD, TD/B/1102, https://unctad.org/system/files/officia ... 02_en.pdf; UNCTAD/GDS/APP/2006/1; http://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/5141/2022/en/, pp. 164-193.
[41] Tariq Dana, “Dominate and pacify: Contextualizing the political economy of the occupied Palestinian territories since 1967,” in Alaa Tartir, et. al. (eds), Political Economy of Palestine: Critical, Interdisciplinary, and Decolonial Perspectives (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021), pp. 25-47; Shir Hever, The Political Economy of Israel’s Occupation: Repression beyond Exploitation (Pluto Press, 2010), pp. 27-37.
[42] http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/ ... 6_web2.pdf.
[43] https://documents1.worldbank.org/curate ... GZ0Re101PU
BLIC10Box334128B.pdf, pp.2-3.
[44] https://documents1.worldbank.org/curate ... conomy.pdf p. 5.
[45] Maya Wind, Towers of Ivory and Steel: How Israeli Universities Deny Palestinian Freedom. London (NY: Verso, 2024); Uri Yacobi Keller, “Academic Boycott of Israel and the Complicity of Israeli Academic Institutions in Occupation of Palestinian Territories”, in Shir Hever (ed.), Economy of the Occupation (Alternative Information Center, 2009), p. 5.
[46] S. Abdelnour, “Making a Killing: Israel’s Military-Innovation Ecosystem and the Globalization of Violence”. Organization Studies vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 333-337; Ilan Pappé, The Idea of Israel: A History of Power and Knowledge (London: Verso, 2015), pp. 26-31.
[47] TD/B/71/3; A/79/343.
[48] Antony Loewenstein, The Palestine Laboratory (Verso, 2023), p. 24.
[49] Ali Musleh, “Designing in Real-Time: An Introduction to Weapons Design in the Settler-Colonial Present of Palestine”, Design and Culture, vol. 10, No. 1 (2018) pp. 33-54.
[50] http://www.linkedin.com/posts/israelimo ... 456-gQ-C/; Loewenstein, The Palestine Laboratory, pp. 5-6.
[51] Gabriel Sheffer and Oren Barak (eds), Militarism and Israeli Society (Indiana University Press, 2010).
[52] http://www.sipri.org/sites/default/file ... 2024_0.pdf, p. 2.
[53] http://www.sipri.org/visualizations/202 ... world-2023.
[54] Submission (2.45); https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-prio ... 001501806; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEexR-3VrjI (2024); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbIyvbbC68A (2025) 42 mins.
[55] http://www.elbitsystems.com/blog/elbit- ... nnovation; http://www.linkedin.com/posts/israelimo ... 1281-qkbU/.
[56] http://www.reuters.com/business/aerospa ... 025-01-07/.
[57] https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-a ... n-in-2024/ .
[58] https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/RL30563.pdf; https://ploughshares.ca/global-producti ... -fighter/; https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/th ... ed-israel; http://www.gov.il/en/pages/ef35adir.
[59] investigate.afsc.org/company/lockheed-martin.
[60] https://investigate.info/company/leonardo.
[61] http://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/04/f-35 ... tion-has/; http://www.airandspaceforces.com/PDF/Ma ... raeli.pdf; https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/38893; http://www.iai.co.il/f-16-aerostructure ... ed-martin; https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2025/02/1 ... -software/.
[62] https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/ ... th-208569; http://www.twz.com/israeli-f-35-shoots- ... e-missile; http://www.twz.com/air/israeli-f-35s-fi ... in-combat; https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/ ... uck-207837.
[63] http://www.wdmma.org/israeli-air-force. ... _vignette; http://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-il/index.html.
[64] https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/upload ... ayward.pdf, pp. 12, 14; https://www.f-16.net/f-16_armament_article9.html; https://www.airandspaceforces.com/weapo ... 2-38-jdam/.
[65] https://environment.ps/en/gazza/ .
[66] As at 5 Jun 2025, https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoi ... IsImMiOjh9.
[67] http://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/file ... ec2023.pdf pp. 6-12; https://danwatch.dk/en/major-civilian-c ... -in-gaza/; http://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/8668/2024/en/, pp. 106-120; https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/ ... s-october; http://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-sen ... 024-06-28/ .
[68] http://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/our-cor ... der-unit/; https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6 ... e-distance.
[69] Stefan Borg, “Assembling Israeli drone warfare: Loitering surveillance and operational sustainability”, Security Dialogue, vol. 52, No. 5 (2021). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10 ... 620956796; http://www.bbc.com/arabic/articles/c98zw7yqr21o; https://dronewars.net/wp-content/upload ... es-WEB.pdf p. 3.
[70] Submission (3.1.17); https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.03298; https://archive.org/details/MIT-researc ... 1/mode/2up.
[71] http://www.mako.co.il/news-military/636 ... 81027.htm; http://www.newscientist.com/article/228 ... -attacks/; http://www.Defenceone.com/ideas/2021/07 ... ne/183156/.
[72] Andrew Feinstein and Paul Holden, “The Failure of the Regulation of the Global Arms Trade as a Consequence of High-Level Conflicts of Interest”, Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol. XXVII, No. 1 (2020).
[73] Submission (2.39); https://jobs.iai.co.il/job/76041120/; http://www.facebook.com/watch/?mibextid ... fcPhxginm; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY9lmDeRKpg.
[74] https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... 777d81bd1/
1733510532268/Report-MaerskShipmentsIsrael-Rev7Nov2024-Final.pdf.
[75] http://www.sipri.org/sites/default/file ... x_2024.pdf
[76] http://www.elbitsystems.com/sites/defau ... 2025e.pdf; http://www.linkedin.com/posts/israelimo ... 984-4NIO/; http://www.linkedin.com/posts/israelimo ... 648-YUG-/; https://defence-industry.eu/israel-aero ... s-in-2024/ .
[77] http://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/s ... meline=y5; https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-se ... 24-06-28/; https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/fil ... L%20v2.pdf, pp. 21-22; http://www.rheinmetall.com/en/products/ ... aft-bombs; http://www.usaspending.gov/ard/CONT_AWD ... D0015_9700.
[78] This technology should be duly considered under: http://www.wassenaar.org/app/uploads/20 ... ments.pdf; see EU Regulation 2021/821, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-cont ... trols.html.
[79] Consider: Rhys Machold, “Reconsidering the laboratory thesis: Palestine/Israel and the geopolitics of representation”, Political Geography, vol. 65 (2018).
[80] https://research.ibm.com/labs/israel; http://www.microsoftrnd.co.il/whoweare#AboutUs; https://startup.google.com/campus/tel-aviv/; https://pages.awscloud.com/rs/112-TZM-7 ... aphics.pdf.
[81] http://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde ... /2023/en/; Submission (2.24).
[82] Loewenstein, The Palestine Laboratory, pp. 83-85; https://besacenter.org/is-israel-the-st ... situation/ .
[83] Loewenstein, The Palestine Laboratory, pp. 147-148.
[84] http://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/reseiv ... spyware-2/.
[85] http://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/doc10/4491/2021/en/ http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/tech ... 7b5a600000.
[86] http://www.gov.il/en/pages/mod-tightens ... mber-2021; http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ... 89_EN.html, paras 19, 85; http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/tech ... e787ac0000.
[87] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/7236; https://finder.startupnationcentral.org ... alpha-zone.
[88] http://www.gov.il/he/pages/ibm_maintana ... _with_piba
[89] A/HRC/53/59, para 93; http://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-bi ... apartheid/
[90] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3774.
[91] https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3774.
[92] https://www.whoprofits.org/publications/report/137.
[93] http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ ... aries.htm; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data ... 0117/ex-21×10312023.htm; https://www.whoprofits.org/publications/report/160.
[94] https://bdsmovement.net/microsoft.
[95] https://medium.com/@notechforapartheid/ ... dfad65a19; https://mr.gov.il/ilgstorefront/en/p/646740
[96] https://mondoweiss.net/2021/03/how-micr ... onialism/; http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-2302074,00.html.
[97] https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2015/0 ... he-cloud/; https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2020/0 ... ployments/.
[98] https://mr.gov.il/ilgstorefront/en/news/details/111222; http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... 10wodmqa2/.
[99] http://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/03/techn ... mbus.html; http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... -document/.
[100] http://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/ne ... -in-gaza/; http://www.972mag.com/cloud-israeli-arm ... icrosoft/; http://www.washingtonpost.com/technolog ... tack-gaza/.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:40 pm

Part 3 of 3

[101] https://www.pc.co.il/news/אבטחת–מידע–וסייבר/412016; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLBDfnZJrC8.
[102] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/j ... microsoft; https://theintercept.com/2022/07/24/goo ... t-nimbus/; Submission (2.27).
[103] http://www.gov.il/en/pages/_bpress_20102022; http://www.gov.il/en/pages/press_01082023_b; https://news.microsoft.com/source/emea/ ... in-israel/.
[104] Submission (2.29); http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-sig ... e-amazon/; https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2P ... gY2Q9/pub; https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issu ... rael-gaza/.
[105] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLBDfnZJrC8.
[106] http://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/10/gaza ... lian-harm; http://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/ ... gaza-call; https://verfassungsblog.de/gaza-artific ... ll-lists/; https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/1656285.
[107] Letter from Palantir, 22 May 2025.
[108] http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2017 ... f5c8a0000; https://blog.palantir.com/announcing-pa ... 1cdbbc6fc; http://www.palantir.com/platforms/aip/; https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/C ... 0127e.pdf; http://www.thenation.com/article/world/ ... -gaza-ai/; https://responsiblestatecraft.org/peter ... -palantir/
[109] http://www.palantir.com/assets/xrfr7uok ... 54a8a1e3cd
83e31c09/C134184_finaleprint.pdf; http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... attle-tech.
[110] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uQCazCId_9o (Time: 1:24:12-1:25:15).
[111] Consider: http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... 133118.pdf.
[112] https://startupnationcentral.org/wp-con ... JAN25.pdf; http://www.jefferies.com/wp-content/upl ... l-2025.pdf
[113] The Wassenaar Arrangement .
[114] Eyal Weizman, Ungrounding: The Architecture of a Genocide (Penguin, forthcoming 2026).
[115] https://unosat.org/products/4130; https://unosat.org/products/4072; https://content.forensic-architecture.o ... r-2023.pdf, p. 53.
[116] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3772 .
[117] http://www.amnestyusa.org/blog/caterpil ... ritories/; http://www.btselem.org/punitive_demolition.
[118] US Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, Cynthia Corrie et al. v. Caterpillar Inc05-36210 (2007); , Case No. http://www.dsca.mil/Congressional-Notif ... bulldozers.
[119] https://catused.cat.com/en/dealer.aspx? ... 3c06f3%7D; http://www.ite-cat.co.il/en; http://www.haaretz.com/2009-03-11/ty-ar ... f518120000.
[120] http://www.iai.co.il/p/panda.
[121] http://www.elbitsystems.com/news/israel ... protection.
[122] https://usa.leonardo.com/en/press-relea ... with-rada; http://www.drsrada.com/blog/israeli-min ... ric-radars.
[123] http://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/ ... -in-gaza/; http://www.ynetnews.com/article/rknechyct; http://www.calcalist.co.il/local_news/a ... j11q00i8nt .
[124] https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/04 ... -profile/; https://bdsmovement.net/news/how-israel ... xecutions; https://www.amnestyusa.org/blog/caterpi ... rritories/.
[125] https://x.com/ytirawi/status/1855614179056439567.
[126] https://x.com/trackingisrael/status/1875627003426255102 .
[127] https://x.com/trackingisrael/status/1886853187316912638 .
[128] https://x.com/trackingisrael/status/1926731978256060869 .
[129] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3772 .
[130] http://www.business-humanrights.org/en/ ... t-respond/.
[131] http://www.dsca.mil/Congressional-Notif ... bulldozers
[132] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3771.
[133] http://www.oemoffhighway.com/market-ana ... es-doosan; http://www.hd-infracore.com/en/company/ ... w/20175112 .
[134] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3644 .
[135] http://www.efco.co.il/en/hyundai/; http://www.mct.co.il/en/history/ .
[136] http://www.mct.co.il/en/history/; http://www.merkavim.co.il/en/Project/34/Mars-Defender; http://www.egged.co.il/Bus-924-Daf.aspx; http://www.egged.co.il/Bus-1001-Volvo-B12B.aspx; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgFrrZzpQXY.
[137] http://www.business-humanrights.org/en/ ... rritories/.
[138] https://stopthewall.org/2022/06/02/who- ... cleansing/.
[139] http://www.whoprofits.org//writable/upl ... e661ba.pdf.
[140] http://www.whoprofits.org/publications/report/138.
[141] http://www.972mag.com/israel-gaza-total ... struction/ https://x.com/YinonMagal/status/1917560269007470856.
[142] https://x.com/ytirawi/status/1913376210790338961; https://tiktokgenocide.com/uploads/isra ... -in-rafah;
https://tiktokgenocide.com/uploads/4-is ... eet-rafah; https://x.com/MiddleEastMnt/status/1852687041152045271; https://x.com/ytirawi/status/1913376210 ... AxqglAAxw; https://x.com/PalinfoAr/status/1865994832922956257; https://x.com/YinonMagal/status/1917560269007470856 .
[143] https://x.com/trackingisrael/status/187 ... 275431758; https://x.com/EyeonPalestine/status/186 ... 504835630; https://x.com/LockMona/status/1863220509690720647 .
[144] http://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/idf-pre ... -corridor/.
[145] http://www.hrw.org/news/2004/11/21/isra ... zer-sales; https://bdsmovement.net/news/hyundai-he ... -apartheid
[146] A/HRC/58/73, para 19.
[147] A/HRC/58/73, para 16.
[148] A/HRC/58/73, paras. 14, 19.
[149] http://www.whoprofits.org//writable/upl ... e661ba.pdf, pp. 60-61; https://corporateoccupation.org/2010/06 ... palestine/ http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3644.
[150] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3840.
[151] http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/ ... 6_web2.pdf, pp. 45-49; http://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2 ... ne-EN.pdf; https://media.business-humanrights.org/ ... sponse.pdf .
[152] http://www.somo.nl/download/39733/, p. 31; https://mr.gov.il/ilgstorefront/en/p/at ... 7%99%D7%9A.
[153] https://mavat.iplan.gov.il/SV4/1/7000965865/310; http://www.heidelbergmaterials.com/site ... gl_web.pdf, p. 23.
[154] http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3958; https://badil.org/cached_uploads/view/2 ... 823935.pdf p. 33-40.
[155] https://bdsmovement.net/boycott-caf.
[156] http://www.cafmobility.com/en/press-roo ... m-project/.
[157] http://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/38503 .
[158] https://pchrgaza.org/wp-content/uploads ... -2020.pdf; http://www.whoprofits.org/publications/report/161 .
[159] http://www.whoprofits.org//writable/upl ... e661ba.pdf, pp. 60, 72.
[160] http://www.hanson-israel.com/Projects.
[161] https://kwri.kw.com/press/keller-willia ... nd-poland/ .
[162] http://www.madlan.co.il/madad–search/מודיעין–עילית–ישראל.
[163] https://homeinisrael.com/en/.
[164] http://www.facebook.com/darren.rich.3/p ... 860188009; http://www.linkedin.com/posts/darren-ri ... 6752-77iU/ .
[165] http://www.myisraelhome.com/new-project; http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?s ... mbed_post; http://www.lustigman.co.il/har-homa; http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/4069.
[166] https://x.com/yoavgallant/status/1711335592942875097 .
[167] A/HRC/55/73, paras. 35-45, 93; A/79/384 paras. 63, 81.b; http://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/8668/2024/en/, pp. 123-201.
[168] A/79/384, paras. 24-34, 59, 67.
[169] http://www.juragentium.org/topics/pales ... water.pdf; http://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campai ... -of-water/ http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... 826325.pdf.
[170] http://www.whoprofits.org/publications/report/165; http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... e-Only.pdf .
[171] http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... 826325.pdf, pp. 15-16; http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/post.aspx?lang=en&ItemID=5946.
[172] https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resou ... ga-621609/ pp. 5, 15-16.
[173] http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/ ... 24web.pdf; http://www.alhaq.org/advocacy/26121.html .
[174] http://www.iea.org/countries/israel/electricity .
[175] http://www.somo.nl/powering-injustice, pp. 3-4, 13; UNCTAD/GDS/APP/2019/2.
[176] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/ ... la/backgro
und_note_halaen.pdf .
[177] http://www.ochaopt.org/page/gaza-strip- ... ity-supply .
[178] http://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilit ... -update-7; http://www.hrw.org/report/2024/12/19/ex ... nians-gaza .
[179] http://www.ochaopt.org/content/humanita ... aza-strip; http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/la ... n-low-fuel
[180] http://www.actionaidusa.org/news/becaus ... starvatio/ .
[181] Samer Abuzerr, et al., “Resurgence of polio during Gaza conflict”, East Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 31, No. 2 (2025), pp. 136–137.
[182] http://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2 ... unlawful/; http://www.unocha.org/publications/repo ... july-2024;
[183] http://www.somo.nl/powering-injustice/, p. 28.
[184] Drummond: https://drummondco.com/our-products/coal/mines; http://www.puertonuevo.com.co/en/; Glencore: http://www.cerrejon.com/en/our-operation; Submission to OHCHR
[185] Decreto 1047 (14 August 2024), “por el cual se establece una prohibición a las exportaciones” http://www.mincit.gov.co/normatividad/d ... to-de-2024 .
[186] http://www.glencore.com/south-africa/who-are-we .
[187] http://www.somo.nl/powering-injustice/; p. 29; https://rbct.co.za/who-we-are/ http://www.passblue.com/2025/04/21/coal ... cide-case/ .
[188] https://israel.chevron.com/en/our-businesses .
[189] http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ ... 231231.htm .
[190] https://israel.chevron.com/en/our-businesses; http://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/generalpag ... Report.pdf, p. 27.
[191] http://www.chevron.com/newsroom/2023/q2 ... ck-to-life https://afsc.org/chevron-fuels-israeli- ... war-crimes .
[192] http://www.reuters.com/business/energy/ ... 025-03-05/ .
[193] http://www.somo.nl/beneath-troubled-waters/, pp. 7-9; http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... Energy.pdf, pp. 49-57.
[194] Submission (2.17); http://www.offshore-technology.com/news ... car-newmed.
[195] http://www.bp.com/en_az/azerbaijan/home ... s/btc.html .
[196] http://www.cpc.ru/en/about/Pages/shareholders.aspx .
[197] https://oilchange.org/wp-content/upload ... 024-v3.pdf, pp. 5-6.
[198] https://oilchange.org/wp-content/upload ... 24-v3.pdf; pp. 2, 4-5, 9.
[199] https://docs.datadesk.eco/public/976ce7dcf00743dc/; http://www.offshore-energy.biz/petrobra ... -7-years/; http://www.offshore-technology.com/proj ... oilfield/; http://www.offshore-technology.com/proj ... oilfield/; http://www.offshore-technology.com/mark ... d-brazil/; http://www.offshore-technology.com/proj ... tos-basin/.
[200] http://www.somo.nl/fuelling-the-flamesin-gaza/; http://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/012/2009/en/ .
[201] http://www.sonolenergy.com/Terminal_and_Pipelines; https://web.archive.org/web/20221206013634/; https://ir.delek-group.com/wp-content/u ... Report.pdf, pp. A278-282; https://docs.datadesk.eco/public/976ce7dcf00743dc/.
[202] https://www.idf.il/השירות–שלי/סוגי–השירות–בצה–ל/שירות–קבע/תחנות–דלק–צהל–רכב–צבאי–דלקן/.
[203] http://www.somo.nl/powering-injustice/ p. 17; https://corporatecms.paz.co.il/media/zd ... y-ltd.pdf; https://paz.co.il/Uploads/investortools ... 3.2023.pdf, p. B-3.
[204] https://media.un.org/unifeed/en/asset/d333/d3334996 .
[205] E.g. https://londonminingnetwork.org/2024/06 ... sentation/ .
[206] Timothy Seidel, “Settler colonialism and land-based struggle in Palestine: Toward a decolonial political economy” in Alaa Tartir, Political Economy of Palestine, pp. 81-107; Nahla Abdo, “Colonial Capitalism and Agrarian Social Structure: Palestine: A Case Study”, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 26, No. 30 (1991).
[207] http://www.fbclawyers.com/news/sale-of- ... completed/.
[208] http://www.tnuva.co.il/news/תנובה–מסכמת–שנה–להקמת–קרן–הרפתנים/; http://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/bjekvgukc.
[209] https://badil.org/phocadownloadpap/badi ... xation.pdf, pp. 35–37, 39, 60–61; https://badil.org/phocadownload/Badil_d ... 013eng.pdf.
[210] A/70/406, p. 9; http://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/399.4
[211] https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/ap ... ba/content.
[212] http://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-799407; http://www.statista.com/statistics/1546 ... ket-share/ .
[213] https://tradingeconomics.com/palestine/ ... -products; http://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/articl ... -conflict; https://oi-files-d8-prod.s3.eu-west-2.a ... 117-en.pdf .
[214] http://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-799407 .
[215] http://www.orbia.com/493a04/siteassets/ ... nglish.pdf, p. 41.
[216] http://www.whoprofits.org/writable/uplo ... 7a92b9.pdf .
[217] S.S. Hughes, et. al., “Greenwashing in Palestine/Israel: Settler colonialism and environmental injustice in the age of climate catastrophe”, Environment and Planning E, vol. 6, No. 1 (2022), pp. 495-513; http://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/generalpag ... _Water.pdf .
[218] Submission (4.4), p. 9.
[219] https://israelagri.com/netbeat-the-firs ... h-a-brain/ .
[220] UNCTAD TD/B/64/4 (2017), p. 4.
[221] https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/ap ... a/content; p. 42. http://www.whoprofits.org//writable/upl ... -Final.pdf, pp. 2-3; http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... 826325.pdf, p.38.
[222] http://www.latimes.com/world-nation/sto ... ate-crisis .
[223] http://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/bjekvgukc .
[224] https://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/do ... ation.pdf; https://www.icjpalestine.com/2024/12/13 ... nt-trade/; https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/ ... arkets.pdf .
[225] https://eumep.org/wp-content/uploads/Eu ... in_v2.pdf; Submission (3.4.1); http://www.qcea.org/wp-content/uploads/ ... g-2012.pdf .
[226] http://www.maersk.com/local-information/europe/israel https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... 222025.pdf .
[227] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content ... 5XC1112(01); https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/e ... gement_en; https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/doc ... 0140en.pdf .
[228] http://www.amnesty.eu/news/israel-opt-b ... territory/ .
[229] http://www.carrefour.com/sites/default/ ... oducts.pdf .
[230] http://www.timesofisrael.com/amazon-del ... ns-report/ .
[231] http://www.hrw.org/report/2018/11/20/be ... ettlements.
[232] http://www.somo.nl/booking-com-accused- ... palestine/.
[233] http://www.somo.nl/additional-evidence- ... ttlements/
[234] http://www.hrw.org/report/2018/11/20/be ... ettlements
[235] http://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-int ... inian-land.
[236] https://www.airbnb.com/help/article/1857.
[237] http://www.alhaq.org/FAI-Unit/25389.html.
[238] http://www.airbnb.co.uk/rooms/686717213082897272 .
[239] http://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/01/world ... akoa.html; A/79/347.
[240] http://www.somo.nl/booking-com-accused- ... alestine/; https://elsc.support/news/booking-com-s ... -palestine.
[241] https://news.airbnb.com/listings-in-disputed-regions/ .
[242] http://www.timesofisrael.com/us-jews-su ... ttlements/ ..
[243] https://news.airbnb.com/update-listings ... -regions/;
[244] e.g. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... -fund-bcg/
[245] http://www.unpri.org/about-us/what-are- ... investment .
[246] https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/ ... principles .
[247] https://boi.org.il/media/3gpniqjj/chap-6-2024.pdf p. 133.
[248] http://www.gov.il/en/pages/press_06032024; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data ... _424b5.htm .
[249] http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ ... _424b5.htm http://www.banktrack.org/news/seven_und ... arch_finds .
[250] http://www.gov.il/en/departments/topics ... nding-page .
[251] http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ ... 424b5.htm; http://www.gov.il/en/pages/press_06032024 .
[252] http://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/dynamiccol ... 2025-1.pdf .
[253] http://www.ft.com/content/90cb26d2-fff5 ... a751478fa; http://www.reuters.com/world/middle-eas ... 24-09-27/; http://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/rese ... -12892616; https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-fiit ... 1001486569.
[254] http://www.banktrack.org/news/seven_und ... _israel_s_
assault_on_gaza_new_research_finds .
[255] http://www.gov.il/en/pages/press_06032024 .
[256] DCI (USA): http://www.israelbonds.com/About-Us/Sales-Offices.aspx; http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ ... 1_fwp.htm; DCI (Europe): https://israelbondsintl.com/contact-us-en/; https://israelbondsintl.com/pdf/2024Inf ... randum.pdf .
[257] https://brokercheck.finra.org/firm/summary/11148; https://littlesis.org/news/u-s-state-an ... ael-bonds/ http://www.dropsitenews.com/p/israel-bo ... aza-moodys .
[258] https://israelbonds.com/; https://israelbondsintl.com/official-do ... pdf#page=7 p. 14.
[259] http://www.fidf.org/donate/ .
[260] http://www.israelbonds.com/PDFs/Orgsfor ... sList.aspx.
[261] http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ ... dex211.htm .
[262] As at 13 May 2025, https://finance.yahoo.com/ .
[263] http://www.justetf.com/en/ .
[264] E.g. https://investor.vanguard.com/investmen ... rofile/veu .
[265] https://13f.info/13f/000095012325004403 ... 325004616; https://13f.info/13f/000095012325004032 ... 323009998; https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/dbio-data-2024/;
[266] https://actions.eko.org/a/axa-investmen ... war-crimes .
[267] https://13f.info/13f/000089842725000009 ... 723000021; https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/dbio-data-2024/.
[268] https://boycottbloodyinsurance.org/wp-c ... eport.pdf; http://www.whoprofits.org/publications/ ... possession .
[269] Consider Elliot Dolan-Evans, Making War Safe for Capitalism (Bristol University Press, forthcoming 2025).
[270] http://www.stortinget.no/no/Hva-skjer-p ... &msid=8539 .
[271] http://www.nbim.no/en/investments/all-investments/#/ .
[272] https://www.cdpq.com/en/investments.
[273] http://www.cdpq.com/sites/default/files ... mation.pdf .
[274] http://www.cdpq.com/en/sir/2024/approach#section-3; http://www.cdpq.com/sites/default/files ... rights.pdf .
[275] http://www.justpeaceadvocates.ca/cdpq-2024-report/2/; http://www.cdpq.com/sites/default/files ... ation.pdf; http://www.cdpq.com/sites/default/files ... mation.pdf .
[276] https://paxforpeace.nl/wp-content/uploa ... e-2024.pdf .
[277] https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/dbio-data-2024/ .
[278] https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/dbio-data-2024/.
[279] https://paxforpeace.nl/wp-content/uploa ... e-2024.pdf .
[280] E.g. http://www.morningstar.com/company/anti ... s-progress.
[281] E.g. Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF, https://fund-docs.vanguard.com/etf-annual-report.pdf, pp. 115-135; Vanguard ActiveLife Climate Aware 60-70% Equity Fund, http://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/inves ... folio-data .
[282] Bloomberg, period 12 October 2023- 22 May 2025.
[283] https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/ ... ok/Dashboa
rd1?publish=yes .
[284] https://peacenow.org.il/en/following-kk ... in-silwan; http://www.haaretz.com/2005-03-13/ty-ar ... f6ddc0000; http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2016 ... e65de0000; https://register-of-charities.charityco ... ls/225910; https://jnf.blob.core.windows.net/image ... 701e626d_4 .
[285] https://israelgives.org/amuta/580407211 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/d ... -west-bank .
[286] https://cfoic.com/; http://www.globalissues.org/news/2010/07/27/6425 .
[287] http://www.christenenvoorisrael.nl/geschiedenis .
[288] https://www.c4israel.org/ .
[289] CFOIC: $1.2 million https://projects.propublica.org/nonprof ... 4957/full; C4I: over €10 million ($11.05 million) https://prod1-plate-attachments.s3.amaz ... arrekening Stichting Christenen voor Israël 2023.pdf, p. 22 .
[290] http://www.platform-investico.nl/onderz ... -movement; https://nltimes.nl/2025/03/25/dutch-fou ... donations; http://www.groene.nl/artikel/cameras-pe ... y-and-guns .
[291] https://dawnmena.org/how-israeli-univer ... military/; http://www.haaretz.com/2009-03-05/ty-ar ... f83300000; https://international.tau.ac.il/court-justice .
[292] https://emekshaveh.org/en/tel-tibna; http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/editoria ... 8d3bf40000 .
[293] http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politics/ ... 7280f0000; http://www.havatzalot.org/copy-of-2; https://rector.huji.ac.il/news/%D7%A2%D ... D7%9C-2019 .
[294] https://en.huji.ac.il/Constitution; https://campuscore.ariel.ac.il/wp/au-in ... tor-guide/ .
[295] Maya Wind, Tower of Ivory and Steel; e.g. https://besacenter.org/palestinians-hop ... increases/.
[296] https://www.elbitsystems.com/blog/where ... o-to-play; https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/bgn/Pages/industry.aspx; https://aerospace.technion.ac.il/academ ... elations/; https://en.huji.ac.il/news/hebrew-unive ... elligence; https://americansforbgu.org/emc-ibm-and ... icon-wadi/ .
[297] Submission (3.1.17); https://fnl.mit.edu/may-june-2024/no-mo ... -defense/; https://archive.org/details/mit-science ... 2/mode/2up, p. 32.
[298] https://vpf.mit.edu/sites/default/files ... rm%20Guida
nce%20Report.pdf, p. 164; http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/events/vie ... vid=10573; https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03298; http://www.newscientist.com/article/228 ... a-attacks/ .
[299] https://vpf.mit.edu/sites/default/files ... form%20Gui
dance%20Report.pdf, p.164; https://doi.org/10.1145/2185677.2185739; https://oar.a-star.edu.sg/communities-c ... cles/19403 .
[300] https://archive.org/details/mit-science ... algorithms, p. 39.
[301] https://news.mit.edu/2019/lockheed-mart ... fund-0418; http://www.palestinechronicle.com/major ... rtin-fund/ .
[302] https://ilp.mit.edu/membership; http://www.business-humanrights.org/en/ ... t-systems/ .
[303] https://dashboard.tech.ec.europa.eu/qs_ ... _public_HE
_Country_Profile/; https://dashboard.tech.ec.europa.eu/qs_ ... ountry=IL; https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/do ... 0_EN.html;
[304] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101121288;
[305] https://dashboard.tech.ec.europa.eu/qs_ ... e/analysis .
[306] https://dashboard.tech.ec.europa.eu/qs_ ... /analysis; https://academiccomplicity.eu/germany/en/TUMU .
[307] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101138105 .
[308] http://www.timesofisrael.com/israels-he ... e-changer/ .
[309] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101086248 .
[310] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101103646 .
[311] https://lsepalestine.github.io/document ... 4-Web.pdf; https://bdsatucl.com/wp-content/uploads ... FINAL.pdf; https://kclbdsforum.wordpress.com/#:~:t ... n%20people .
[312] https://uoe-finance.ed.ac.uk/sites/defa ... Jan%20.pdf .
[313] https://udrc.eng.ed.ac.uk/partners .
[314] https://datasciencelab.ise.bgu.ac.il/ .
[315] Walaa Alqaisiya and Nicola Perugini, “The academic question of Palestine,” Middle East Critique, vol. 33, No. 3 (2024), pp. 299–311.
[316] International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Prosecutor v Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-T, 2 February 2012, para 62.
[317] A/HRC/59/23], para. 5
[318] United Nations, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights,
http://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/file ... shr_en.pdf
[319] UNGP 13
[320] UNDP, Heightened Human Rights Due Diligence for Businesses in Conflicted Affect Contexts: A Guide, http://www.undp.org/publications/height ... exts-guide (“UNDP Heighened HRDD”); UNGP 7 Commentary; OECD, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct, http://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oec ... 57-en.html (“OECD Guidelines”), para. 43
[321] A/75/212 (2020), para 10
[322] See Section 2.3
[323] A/HRC/4/35/Add.1 (2007); UNGP 1-7
[324] UNGP 7 Commentary, CCPR, General Comment 31 (2004), para 10; CESCR, General Comment 24 (2017), paras. 25-37; consider CCPR/C/DEU/CO/6, para. 16
[325] Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, Arts 5, 8, 9, 11; CESCR General Comment 24 (2017), para. 11
[326] UNGP 4
[327] UNGP 14
[328] UNGP 23; UNGP 11 Commentary; OECD Guidelines, para. 43; HR/PUB/12/02 (2012), pp. 13-14; https://ipisresearch.be/wp-content/uplo ... -chain.pdf.
[329] UNGP 13; Submission (1.13.a)
[330] A/HRC/RES/17/4 (2011); Irene Pietropaoli, “Expert Legal Opinion: the Obligations of Third States and Corporations to Prevent and Punish Genocide”, 5 June 2024, http://www.alhaq.org/advocacy/23294.html, p. 38
[331] Note: the UNGPs refer to “adverse human rights impact”, this text uses “human rights violations” to reflect the context of the oPt, where violations and crimes are occurring
[332] UNGP 13, Submission (1.13.b) p. 20
[333] Rachel Davis, “The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and Conflict-Affected Areas: State Obligations and Business Responsibilities”, Int’l Rev. Red Cross, vol. 94, No. 887, (2012), p. 973; Tara Van Ho, “Defining the Relationships: ‘Cause, Contribute, and Directly Linked to’ in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 43, No. 4, (November 2021), p. 634; see also Note by the Chair of the Negotiations on the 2011 Revision, Regarding the Terminology on “Directly Linked”, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2011 Revision), https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/global-f ... ment-3.pdf.
[334] Ibid
[335] Irene Pietropaoli, “Expert Legal Opinion”, p. 38.
[336] UNGP Commentary to Principles 17 and 19; Tara Van Ho, “Defining the Relationships”, p. 631, John Ruggie, Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (2013), p. 99; Surya Deva, “Mandatory human rights due diligence laws in Europe: A mirage for rightsholders?”, Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 36 (2023), 389.
[337] UNGP 7; UNDP Heightened HRDD Guide; A/75/212 (2020); A/HRC/17/32 (2011).
[338] UNDP Heightened HRDD Guide; p. 26.
[339] UNGP 7, 23 Commentary; UNDP Heightened HRDD, p.10; UN, Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes – A tool for prevention, 2014, http://www.refworld.org/reference/manua ... /en/102631 (“Framework for Atrocity Crimes”); A/75/212 (2020), para. 43; http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/B ... e2014.pdf; See also: T.L. Van Ho and M.K. Alshaleel, “The Mutual Fund Industry and the Protection of Human Rights” Human Rights Law Review, vol. 18, No. 1 (2018).
[340] OHCHR, The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: Interpretative Guide, 2017, http://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/file ... 2.2_En.pdf (“OHCHR Interpretative Guide”), p. 5; Tara Van Ho, “Defining the Relationships”.
[341] UNGP 19 Commentary, UNGP 22.
[342] UNGP 17 Commentary.
[343] UNGP 19 Commentary; OHCHR Interpretative Guide, p. 7.
[344] UNGP 19 Commentary; Tara Van Ho, “Defining the Relationships”, p. 635; OHCHR, Response to Request
from BankTrack for Advice Regarding the Application of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in the Context of the Banking Sector 5 (12 June 2017),
http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/B ... ciples.pdf, p.7.
[345] John Ruggie and John Sherman, “The Concept of ‘Due Diligence’ in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A Reply to Jonathan Bonnitcha and Robert McCorquodale”, The European Journal of International Law, vol. 28, No. 3 (November 2017), pp. 923-924.
[346] UNGP 18 and Commentary; Submission (1.5.b); Ruggie and Sherman, “The Concept of Due Diligence’”, p. 924. See David Bilchitz and Surya Deva, “The human rights obligations of business: a critical framework for the future” in Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (CUP, 2013), p. 11
[347] Tara Van Ho, “Defining the Relationships”, p. 631; Surya Deva, “Mandatory human rights due diligence”, pp. 395-396.
[348] UNGP 12 Commentary, 14 Commentary
[349] UNGP 14; OECD Guidelines, p. 31; Submission 1.3
[350] A/75/212 (2020), para. 13.
[351] A/75/212 (2020), paras. 19-21; Framework for Atrocity Crimes; UNGP 17 Commentary; OECD Guidelines, paras. 50, 51.
[352] UNGP 7, 13, 17, 19, 23 Commentary.
[353] Krupp Case (United States of America v. Alfried Krupp), Judgment of 31 July 1948, in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. IX; I.G Farben Case (United States of America v. Carl Krauch et al.), Judgment of 30 July 1948, in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. VIII.
[354] Submission (1.3); Anita Ramasastry, “Corporate Complicity: From Nuremberg to Rangoon – An Examination of Forced Labor Cases and Their Impact on the Liability of Multinational Corporations” Berkeley Journal of International Law vol. 20, Issue 1, p. 91. Annika van Baar, “Transnational Holocaust Litigation and Corporate Accountability for Atrocities Beyond Nuremberg” (19 February 2019); Jonathan Kolieb, ‘Through the Looking-Glass: Nuremberg’s Confusing Legacy on Corporate Accountability under International Law’ American University International Law Review vol. 32, No. 2, (2017), p. 569, 582.
[355] Michael Kelly, Prosecuting Corporations for Genocide (OUP, 2016); Submission 1.3; A/75/212, para. 11.
[356] International Law Commision, Draft articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity, with commentaries, 2019, A/74/10, pp. 81-84, https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instrume ... 7_2019.pdf, African Union, Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, 27 June 2014, art. 46 (not yet in force); Special Tribunal for Lebanon, New TV S.A.L. Karma Mohamed Tashin Al Khayat, Case No. STL-14-05/PT/AP/AR126.1, Decision of 2 October 2014; U.S. v. Krauch, et. al, (the I.G. Farben Case), VIII Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, iii-iv (1952); contra UN Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Rome, 15 June-17 July 1998, Official Records, vol. III (A/CONF.183/13), art. 23, para. 6, footnote 71.
[357] E.g. Ecuador Código Orgánico Integral Penal, Registro Oficial, Suplemento, Año 1, N° 180, 10 February 2014, art. 90; http://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/upload ... tcrime.pdf
[358] Genocide Convention, Article VI; Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2007, para 420; Michael Kelly, Prosecuting Corporations for Genocide.
[359] International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (1973), art I(2).
[360] International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, art. 5
[361] UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, art. 10.
[362] UN Convention against Corruption, art. 26.
[363] International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, Prosecutor v Blaškić, Case No. IT-95-14-A, 29 April 2004, paras. 46-47.
[364] Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, para. 533-538; Prosecutor v. Blagojević, Case No. IT-02-60-T,, para. 777; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Prosecutor v. Kamuhanda, Case No. ICTR-95-54A-A, Judgment, 22 January 2003, para. 596.
[365] International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Prosecutor v Nahimana, Barayagwiza and Ngeze, Case No. ICTR-99-52-T, Judgment, Summary, 3 December 2003, paras. 973-974.
[366] Note: the most common criminal standard requires “a substantial effect” on the commission of the crime: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Prosecutor v. Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1-T, 7 May 1997, paras. 688-692; while the ICC does not set such a high standard, an “effect” is sufficient: International Criminal Court, Prosecutor v. Bemba, Case No. ICC-01/05-01/13, Trial Judgment Pursuant to Article 72 of the Statute, 19 October 2016, para. 90; International Criminal Court, Prosecutor v. Al Mahdi, Case No. ICC-01/12-01/15, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, 24 March 2016, para. 26; See Oona A. Hathaway et al, “Aiding and Abetting in International Criminal Law”, Cornell Law Review, vol. 104, (2019), pp.1606-1609.
[367] International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, Prosecutor v Furundzija, Trial Judgment, Case No. IT-95-17/1-T, 10 December 1998, paras. 209, 235; http://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2 ... t-2008.pdf, pp. 9, 39-40; Irene Pietropaoli, “Expert Legal Opinion”, pp. 18-19; consider also the Lundin Oil Case before the Swedish District Court, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en ... mes-sudan/.
[368] Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, para. 541; Prosecutor v. Blagojević, Case No. IT-02-60-T, paras. 384, 777; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Prosecutor v Ntakirutimana and Ntakirutimana, Case No. ICTR-96-10-A and ICTR-96-17-A, Appeal Judgement, 13 December 2004, paras. 500-501, 551; see also in the context of state responsibility: Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2007, para 421; William A. Schabas, Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes (CUP, 2009) p. 522.
[369] Rome Statute, Article 25(3)(c) (Emphasis added); International Criminal Court, Prosecutor v. Bemba, Case No. ICC-01/05-01/13, Trial Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, para. 97 (Oct. 19, 2016).
[370] International Residual Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals, Prosecutor v Kabuga (Case No. MICT-13-38-PT, Prosecution’s Second Amended Indictment, 1 March 2021, paras. 9, 25, 30, 34.
[371] Trial of Bruno Tesch and Two Others (The Zyklon B Case) (1947) 1 Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals 93 (British Military Court, Hamburg) pp. 102.
[372] A/HRC/RES/31/36 (2016); A/HRC/RES/53/25 (2023); UN Database: http://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/r ... se-hrc3136.
[373] Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Vedanta Resources PLC v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20.
[374] District Court of The Hague, Public Prosecutor v. Frans Cornelis Adrianus van Anraat, 23 December 2005, http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase. ... an-Anraat/.
[375] “Communiques de Presse: Lafarge Poursuivi Pour Financement Presume de Terrorisme” (15 November 2016). Cour de cassation, [7 September 2021] Pourvoi No. 19-87.036; http://www.asso-sherpa.org/lafarge-in-s ... tinational.
[376] http://www.business-humanrights.org/en/ ... mes-sudan/.
[377] Alien Torts Statute, 28 US Code, para. 1350; note Supreme Court decisions in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain; Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum; Jesner v. Arab Bank and Nestle v. Doe have severely restricted the scope of the Statute in recent years; see Federica Violi, “Navigating Corporate Accountability in International Economic Law: A Critical Overview”, (2024) in Ioannis Papadopoulos, et al., (eds), Handbook of Accountability Studies: Politics, Law, Business, Work (Elgar Publishing, forthcoming 2025).
[378] Doe v Unocal (hereafter Unocal) https://earthrights.org/case/doe-v-unoc ... 05f26-f4b6, Wiwa v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co (Wiwa), Talisman, Bowoto v Chevron (Bowoto), John Does v Exxon Mobil Corp (Exxon Mobil), Rio Tinto, and Beanal v Freeport-McMoran Inc. (Beanal). 7
[379] E.g. Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (UK)
[380] Consider World Uyghur Congress v National Crime Agency [2024] EWCA Civ 715.
[381] French Duty of Vigilance Act 2017, LOI n° 2017-399 du 27 mars 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre.
[382] German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chain 2021, Gesetz über die unternehmerischen Sorgfaltspflichten in Lieferketten, 16 July 2021.
[383] Norwegian Transparency Act 2021, Act relating to enterprises’ transparency and work on fundamental human rights and decent working conditions, https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/2021-06-18-99.
[384] Swiss Due Diligence Act 2021, Nicolas Bueno, “The Swiss Human Rights Due Diligence Legislation: Between Law and Politics”, Business and Human Rights Journal, vol. 6, No. 3 (2021), pp. 542-549.
[385] EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, 2024/1760, (July 2024).
[386] http://www.business-humanrights.org/en/ ... -on-csddd/.
[387] https://commission.europa.eu/business-e ... companies; http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2024/03 ... f-vigilanc.
[388] Regulation (EU) 2021/821
[389] Regulation (EU) 2024/301
[390] e.g. http://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets ... usion.pdf; http://www.ccc.ca/wp-content/uploads/20 ... curity.pdf.
[391] OECD Guidelines.
[392] https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/ncps/israel.htm.
[393] https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/ncps/how ... -cases.htm.
[394] UK National Contact Point, Final Statement: Lawyers for Palestinian Human Rights complaint to UK NCP about JCB, Decision, 12 November 2021; Spanish National Contact Point, Final Statement: Comité de Solidaridad de la Causa Árabe (CSCA) & a company active in the construction sector, 25 May 2022.
[395] Ralph Wilde, Legal Opinion, 1 December 2024, https://alhaqeurope.org/wp-content/uplo ... pinion.pdf, paras. 91-94.
[396] http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... 840036.pdf ; http://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/dow ... glish.pdf; https://badil.org/cached_uploads/view/2 ... 22997.pdf; https://badil.org/cached_uploads/view/2 ... 23024.pdf; http://www.btselem.org/publications/ful ... _apartheid.
[397] UNSC 242 (1967), 338 (1973), S/RES/2334 (2016)
[398] CERD/C/113/3
[399] A/HRC/49/87 (2022); A/HRC/13/53 (2010)
[400] A/HRC/28/79 (2015); A/HRC/50/21 (2022)
[401] http://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/th ... ersecution
[402] http://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campai ... partheid/; http://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/2018-09 ... Jj3FPvx6q=.
[403] http://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/up ... sment.pdf; https://unispal.un.org/pdfs/GS_HumImplosion.pdf.
[404] https://oi-files-d8-prod.s3.eu-west-2.a ... lity_4.pdf.
[405] Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 9 July 2004, I.C.J. Reports 2004, paras. 120-123; 163(3)(D)
[406] https://bdsmovement.net/BNC.
[407] http://www.whoprofits.org/; https://afsc.org/; https://dontbuyintooccupation.org/; https://act.progressive.international/watermelon/
[408] http://www.klp.no/en/corporate-responsi ... ar-inc.pdf.
[409] http://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-fina ... territory/.
[410] https://hwkvufmtfxjkrhbrfqkj.supabase.c ... report.pdf
[411] http://www.middleeastmonitor.com/201508 ... -campaign/
[412] http://www.crh.com/media/1062/dev-strat ... 2016_2.pdf.
[413] http://www.generalmills.com/news/storie ... -in-israel
[414] https://mayafiles.tase.co.il/RHtm/15240 ... 24391.htm; http://www.g4s.com/news-and-insights/ne ... srael-ltd; http://www.g4s.com/news-and-insights/ne ... g4s-israel
[415] http://www.y-yokohama.com/release/pdf/2 ... 4mg004.pdf
[416] http://www.reuters.com/business/retail- ... 024-06-03/
[417] http://www.unilever.com/news/press-and- ... decision/; http://www.nbcnews.com/business/busines ... -n1274403; https://fortune.com/europe/2025/03/19/u ... -mission/; http://www.timesofisrael.com/ben-jerrys ... rael-spat/
[418] http://www.bdsmovement.net/news/israel- ... er-sponsor
[419] A/HRC/22/63 (2013) para. 96; A/HRC/RES/31/36 (2016); A/HRC/43/71 (2020).
[420] http://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/file ... rc3136.pdf para. 14.
[421] Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Advisory Opinion, 19 July 2024, I.C.J. Reports 2024, para. 111.
[422] Ibid., paras. 155 and 261–264.
[423] Ibid., paras. 173, 179 and 252.
[424] Ibid., paras. 223-229.
[425] Ibid., paras. 252-258.
[426] Rome Statute, Article 8 bis; A/77/356, para. 22.
[427] Ralph Wilde, Legal Opinion, para 45.
[428] Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Advisory Opinion, 19 July 2024, I.C.J. Reports 202, paras. 230-233; A/77/356 paras. 16-18.
[429] A/77/356 (2022) para. 237.
[430] A/RES/ES-10/24 (2024), para. 2.
[431] Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Advisory Opinion, 19 July 2024, I.C.J. Reports 202, paras. 278-279.
[432] Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Order, 26 January 2024, I.C.J. Reports 2024, para. 86(1)
[433] Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Request for the Modification of the Order of 28 March 2024, Order, 24 May 2024, I.C.J. Reports 2024, paras. 29, 57(2)(a).
[434] http://www.un.org/unispal/document/arms ... s-20jun24/
[435] Alleged Breaches of Certain International Obligations in Respect of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Nicaragua v. Germany), Order, 30 April 2024, I.C.J. Reports 2024, paras. 22–24; Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Advisory Opinion, 19 July 2024, I.C.J. Reports 202, para. 285(7).
[436] Ralph Wilde, Legal Opinion, paras. 51-52.
[437] CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993, para. 9.2; CCPR/C/124/D/2950/2017, paras. 9.9-9.11; CCPR/C/124/D/2668/2015, paras. 1.4, 2.4, 6.11
[438] Common Article 1 of both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
[439] A/RES/637(VII); CCPR General Comment No. 12 (1984) para. 1.
[440] UNGP Commentary to 19; Tyler Mcreary, “Historicising the encounter between state, corporate and indigenous authorities on Gitxsan lands” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, vol. 33, No. 3, (May 2016), p. 18.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:43 pm

Francesca Albanese “Israel is responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history”
UN Palestinian Rights Committee
Jul 7, 2025 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT GENEVA

In her address to the Human Rights Council on 3 July 2025, Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, warned of a genocide unfolding in Gaza and the West Bank. She described the situation as “apocalyptic,” stating that “Israel is responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history.” With over 200,000 Palestinians reported killed or injured and the real toll “far higher,” she accused Israel of dismantling humanitarian aid in Gaza, replacing it with a “so-called 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' [that] is nothing else than a death trap.” She emphasized that this was not an isolated crisis but part of a decades-long “settler colonial project of erasure” that has intensified in recent months through military force, starvation, and mass displacement.

Albanese condemned the deep complicity of corporate and state actors in what she called an “economy of genocide.” She detailed how arms manufacturers, surveillance firms, banks, tech giants, and universities profit from the occupation, while “colonies spread, financed by banks and insurers, powered by fossil fuels and normalized by tourism platforms.” She stressed that this is not just about “wrongful conduct” but about a global system that sustains apartheid and enables ethnic cleansing. Citing international legal obligations, she called for a “full arms embargo on Israel,” suspension of trade agreements, and immediate disengagement from any business activity contributing to international crimes. “What I exposed is not a list, it is a system,” she said, urging the world to act before it’s too late: “What comes next depends on all of us... It’s not a question of if, it’s just a question of when.”



Transcript

I address you today with a sense of
foroding that words can hardly capture.
I no longer know what more can be said.
14 months ago, I warned that this
genocide marked an escalatory stage of a
longstanding settler colonial project
over Asia, one that has targeted the
Palestinian people for over seven
decades. And now it is happening and we
must stop it. The situation in the
occupied Palestinian territory is
apocalyptic. In Gaza, people continue to
endure suffering beyond imagination.
Israel is responsible for one of the
crulest genocides in modern history.
Official figures count over 200,000
killed or injured. Leading hell experts
estimate that true toll is far higher.
As the cost to the Palestinian people
grows, Israel has dismantled the last
function of the UN in Gaza. humanitarian
aid. Its so-called Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation is nothing else than a death
trap engineered to kill or force the
flight of a starved, bombarded,
emasiated population marked for
elimination.
Meanwhile, in the West Bank,
Palestinians continue to face the
largest wave of force displacement since
1967.
Nearly 1,000 have been killed, 10,000
injured, 10,000 detained, many tortured,
while armed settlers rampage, and 900
checkpoints and other obstacles choke
daily life. As Palestinians are
abandoned to their faith, I must ask
you, those of you with a diplomatic
presence in the occupied Palestinian
territory, what do your colleagues
report? What is your presence for if not
to confirm what I'm saying and act to
stop it in accordance with international
law?
At the same time, since October 2023,
the Tel Aviv stock exchange has soared
by 213%
in US dollars, amassing,
sorry, amassing 225.7
billion US dollars in in market gains,
including
67.8
billion in the last month alone. One
people enriched, one people erased.
Israel has used the genocide as an
opportunity to test new weapons,
customized surveillance, lethal drones,
rudder systems, and other unmanned
technology to exterminate a population
without restraint. While Elbit Systems
wins Israeli Ministry of Defense award
for innovation,
Loid Martin and the global web of 1000
1,650
other companies benefit from Israel
flying the F35 Father jets for the first
time in beast mode, carrying four times
the ordinance up to 22,000 pounds than
when operating in stealth mode. It is
its very defenselessness that has made
the people and the land of Palestine an
ideal laboratory for the Israeli
military-industrial complex. The forever
occupation has provided an optimal
testing ground testing ground for arms
manufacturers and big tech with little
oversight and zero accountability while
investors, private and public
institutions have profited handsomely. I
once thought the problem was ignorance,
a lack of understanding about Palestine
and its history. Later, I saw the
ideology at play, the deep political
affinity many states and elites hold
with the state of Israel. But in the
face of genocide, so visible, so
ostentatious, so live streamed, these
explanations fall short. My term as a
special reportorter, including the first
the first opposition to my mandate, and
this report in particular, reveals a
darker truth. Some states support Israel
to preserve their regional dominance,
creating the material conditions that
sustain its settler colonial project and
make it succeed. In fact, and it's in
this bigger scheme, a web of corporate
actors are deeply deeply imshed in an
underlying economy, helping displaced
indigenous Palestinians and replace them
with Israeli settlers in what remains of
their land.
This report exposes the economic
conditions driving and enabling Israel's
machinery of displacement through
destruction, segregation, and
surveillance of the Palestinians and
replacement through the construction of
alternative landscapes. economies and
realities for the settlers, their
visitors and associates. From arms
manufacturers, tech giants, banks,
energy firms, online platforms,
supermarkets, and universities,
corporate actors have supplied the
tools, financing, and infrastructure.
The legitimacy for these machinery over
Asia, weapons and data system brutalized
and surveiled Palestinians. Colonies
spread financed by banks and insurers
powered by fossil fuels and normalized
by tourism platforms, supermarket chains
and academic institutions.
All have helped entrenched apartheid and
enabled the slow inexurable destruction
of Palestinian life. Corporate entities
entangled in this ecosystem have long
been on notice. Their products, services
and corporate relationship directly
linked them to an economy of occupation
that has function in violation of
permparytory norms. The for Geneva
Convention and the Rome Stad under the
UN guiding principles on business and
human rights. Even this minimal
connection triggers a clear
responsibility to use their leverage to
end abuse. But in this context of
Palestine, we are not talking about
isolated specific incidents of wrongful
conduct. The severity of the structural
and sustained violations and crimes at
tissue has been confirmed by the
International Court of Justice and has
led to arrest warrants being issued by
the International Criminal Court.
In this context, what action could be
possibly s could be could possibly be
sufficient to rectify these violations
and the corporate connection to them?
The answer is simple. There is a
primaasia responsibility on every state
and corporate entity to completely
abstain from or end their relationship
with this economy of the occupation
especially as it has transformed into an
economy of genocide.
In the face of all this, too few have
disengaged in the last tw 21 months.
Armed companies have turned nearrecord
profits by equipping Israel with
cuttingedge weaponry to unleash 85,000
tons of explosives, six times the power
of Hiroshima on Gaza. The companies
provide the dual use infrastructure that
is utilized as a weapon of mass
targeting and killing. The machinery of
the global construction equipment giants
is raising Gaza to the ground,
preventing the return and reconstruction
of Palestinian life. Global energy
conglomerates have fueled these assaults
with coal, coal, oil, gas, while the
same infrastructure has been deprived to
the Palestinians. No water, no
electricity, creating the conditions of
life life calculated to destroy. While
major global banks have underwritten and
purchased Israeli Treasury bonds,
bankrolling the devastation at the time
of caping military budget deficits and
plummeting credit rating. The 40
entities named in my report alongside
their parents, subsidiary, licences and
franchises are just the tip of the
iceberg illustrative of this system that
entangles many many more. What I exposed
is not a list. It is a system and it is
to be addressed. Now my expectation is
that OC, the OCHR database, the working
group on business and human rights and
lawyers, investigative journalists and
prosecutors globally will take this
framework and secure that states what
states have failed to achieve
accountability and we must reverse the
tide. As I conclude, let me say member
states must impose a full arms embargo
on Israel, suspend all trade agreements
and investment relations, and enforce
accountability, ensuring that corporate
entities face legal consequences for
their involvement in serious violations
of international law. and corporate
entities must urgently seize all
business activities and terminate
relationship directly linked
contributing to and causing human rights
violations and international crimes
against the Palestinian people. At this
existential moment for the Palestinian
people, trade unions, lawyers, civil
society groups, and ordinary citizens
should encourage such behavioral change
from the side of corporate entities and
governments by pressing for boycots,
divestment, sanctions, and
accountability.
What comes next depends on all of us.
And I truly believe that together we can
make it. It's not a question of if, it's
just a question of when. Thank you.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:43 pm

Francesca Albanese “Israel is responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history”
UN Palestinian Rights Committee
Jul 7, 2025 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT GENEVA

In her address to the Human Rights Council on 3 July 2025, Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, warned of a genocide unfolding in Gaza and the West Bank. She described the situation as “apocalyptic,” stating that “Israel is responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history.” With over 200,000 Palestinians reported killed or injured and the real toll “far higher,” she accused Israel of dismantling humanitarian aid in Gaza, replacing it with a “so-called 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' [that] is nothing else than a death trap.” She emphasized that this was not an isolated crisis but part of a decades-long “settler colonial project of erasure” that has intensified in recent months through military force, starvation, and mass displacement.

Albanese condemned the deep complicity of corporate and state actors in what she called an “economy of genocide.” She detailed how arms manufacturers, surveillance firms, banks, tech giants, and universities profit from the occupation, while “colonies spread, financed by banks and insurers, powered by fossil fuels and normalized by tourism platforms.” She stressed that this is not just about “wrongful conduct” but about a global system that sustains apartheid and enables ethnic cleansing. Citing international legal obligations, she called for a “full arms embargo on Israel,” suspension of trade agreements, and immediate disengagement from any business activity contributing to international crimes. “What I exposed is not a list, it is a system,” she said, urging the world to act before it’s too late: “What comes next depends on all of us... It’s not a question of if, it’s just a question of when.”



Transcript

I address you today with a sense of
foroding that words can hardly capture.
I no longer know what more can be said.
14 months ago, I warned that this
genocide marked an escalatory stage of a
longstanding settler colonial project
over Asia, one that has targeted the
Palestinian people for over seven
decades. And now it is happening and we
must stop it. The situation in the
occupied Palestinian territory is
apocalyptic. In Gaza, people continue to
endure suffering beyond imagination.
Israel is responsible for one of the
crulest genocides in modern history.
Official figures count over 200,000
killed or injured. Leading hell experts
estimate that true toll is far higher.
As the cost to the Palestinian people
grows, Israel has dismantled the last
function of the UN in Gaza. humanitarian
aid. Its so-called Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation is nothing else than a death
trap engineered to kill or force the
flight of a starved, bombarded,
emasiated population marked for
elimination.
Meanwhile, in the West Bank,
Palestinians continue to face the
largest wave of force displacement since
1967.
Nearly 1,000 have been killed, 10,000
injured, 10,000 detained, many tortured,
while armed settlers rampage, and 900
checkpoints and other obstacles choke
daily life. As Palestinians are
abandoned to their faith, I must ask
you, those of you with a diplomatic
presence in the occupied Palestinian
territory, what do your colleagues
report? What is your presence for if not
to confirm what I'm saying and act to
stop it in accordance with international
law?
At the same time, since October 2023,
the Tel Aviv stock exchange has soared
by 213%
in US dollars, amassing,
sorry, amassing 225.7
billion US dollars in in market gains,
including
67.8
billion in the last month alone. One
people enriched, one people erased.
Israel has used the genocide as an
opportunity to test new weapons,
customized surveillance, lethal drones,
rudder systems, and other unmanned
technology to exterminate a population
without restraint. While Elbit Systems
wins Israeli Ministry of Defense award
for innovation,
Loid Martin and the global web of 1000
1,650
other companies benefit from Israel
flying the F35 Father jets for the first
time in beast mode, carrying four times
the ordinance up to 22,000 pounds than
when operating in stealth mode. It is
its very defenselessness that has made
the people and the land of Palestine an
ideal laboratory for the Israeli
military-industrial complex. The forever
occupation has provided an optimal
testing ground testing ground for arms
manufacturers and big tech with little
oversight and zero accountability while
investors, private and public
institutions have profited handsomely. I
once thought the problem was ignorance,
a lack of understanding about Palestine
and its history. Later, I saw the
ideology at play, the deep political
affinity many states and elites hold
with the state of Israel. But in the
face of genocide, so visible, so
ostentatious, so live streamed, these
explanations fall short. My term as a
special reportorter, including the first
the first opposition to my mandate, and
this report in particular, reveals a
darker truth. Some states support Israel
to preserve their regional dominance,
creating the material conditions that
sustain its settler colonial project and
make it succeed. In fact, and it's in
this bigger scheme, a web of corporate
actors are deeply deeply imshed in an
underlying economy, helping displaced
indigenous Palestinians and replace them
with Israeli settlers in what remains of
their land.
This report exposes the economic
conditions driving and enabling Israel's
machinery of displacement through
destruction, segregation, and
surveillance of the Palestinians and
replacement through the construction of
alternative landscapes. economies and
realities for the settlers, their
visitors and associates. From arms
manufacturers, tech giants, banks,
energy firms, online platforms,
supermarkets, and universities,
corporate actors have supplied the
tools, financing, and infrastructure.
The legitimacy for these machinery over
Asia, weapons and data system brutalized
and surveiled Palestinians. Colonies
spread financed by banks and insurers
powered by fossil fuels and normalized
by tourism platforms, supermarket chains
and academic institutions.
All have helped entrenched apartheid and
enabled the slow inexurable destruction
of Palestinian life. Corporate entities
entangled in this ecosystem have long
been on notice. Their products, services
and corporate relationship directly
linked them to an economy of occupation
that has function in violation of
permparytory norms. The for Geneva
Convention and the Rome Stad under the
UN guiding principles on business and
human rights. Even this minimal
connection triggers a clear
responsibility to use their leverage to
end abuse. But in this context of
Palestine, we are not talking about
isolated specific incidents of wrongful
conduct. The severity of the structural
and sustained violations and crimes at
tissue has been confirmed by the
International Court of Justice and has
led to arrest warrants being issued by
the International Criminal Court.
In this context, what action could be
possibly s could be could possibly be
sufficient to rectify these violations
and the corporate connection to them?
The answer is simple. There is a
primaasia responsibility on every state
and corporate entity to completely
abstain from or end their relationship
with this economy of the occupation
especially as it has transformed into an
economy of genocide.
In the face of all this, too few have
disengaged in the last tw 21 months.
Armed companies have turned nearrecord
profits by equipping Israel with
cuttingedge weaponry to unleash 85,000
tons of explosives, six times the power
of Hiroshima on Gaza. The companies
provide the dual use infrastructure that
is utilized as a weapon of mass
targeting and killing. The machinery of
the global construction equipment giants
is raising Gaza to the ground,
preventing the return and reconstruction
of Palestinian life. Global energy
conglomerates have fueled these assaults
with coal, coal, oil, gas, while the
same infrastructure has been deprived to
the Palestinians. No water, no
electricity, creating the conditions of
life life calculated to destroy. While
major global banks have underwritten and
purchased Israeli Treasury bonds,
bankrolling the devastation at the time
of caping military budget deficits and
plummeting credit rating. The 40
entities named in my report alongside
their parents, subsidiary, licences and
franchises are just the tip of the
iceberg illustrative of this system that
entangles many many more. What I exposed
is not a list. It is a system and it is
to be addressed. Now my expectation is
that OC, the OCHR database, the working
group on business and human rights and
lawyers, investigative journalists and
prosecutors globally will take this
framework and secure that states what
states have failed to achieve
accountability and we must reverse the
tide. As I conclude, let me say member
states must impose a full arms embargo
on Israel, suspend all trade agreements
and investment relations, and enforce
accountability, ensuring that corporate
entities face legal consequences for
their involvement in serious violations
of international law. and corporate
entities must urgently seize all
business activities and terminate
relationship directly linked
contributing to and causing human rights
violations and international crimes
against the Palestinian people. At this
existential moment for the Palestinian
people, trade unions, lawyers, civil
society groups, and ordinary citizens
should encourage such behavioral change
from the side of corporate entities and
governments by pressing for boycots,
divestment, sanctions, and
accountability.
What comes next depends on all of us.
And I truly believe that together we can
make it. It's not a question of if, it's
just a question of when. Thank you.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:47 pm

UN's Francesca Albanese slams US sanctions as retaliation for exposing Gaza war crimes
Al Jazeera English
Al Jazeera is funded in whole or in part by the Qatari government. Wikipedia
Jul 10, 2025 #UnitedStates #MarcoRubio #FrancescaAlbanese

UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese condemned US sanctions against her as "obscene" retaliation for exposing Israel’s genocide in Gaza, telling Al Jazeera the move aimed to silence justice efforts.

She linked the sanctions to her report naming companies like Google profiting from Gaza’s destruction, insisting: "I want Google to stop supporting a government that killed 60,000 people.
" Despite visa bans potentially barring her from UN headquarters, Albanese prioritised Gaza’s crisis, noting the US-backed GHF had become a “death trap”, replacing proper humanitarian work.
Drawing parallels to murdered Italian anti-mafia judges, she warned: "These sanctions only work if people stay silent" – vowing to continue defending ICC investigations into Israel’s crimes.
"We stand at a historic reckoning," she declared, her voice sharpening. "Either the world awakens to stop this disgrace, or we surrender to the mafia logic of power."
With Gaza’s death toll rising as she spoke, Albanese’s defiance echoed her earlier warning: "The genocide continues while we talk."



Transcript

UN officials and global human rights
organizations have criticized a US move
imposing sanctions against the UN
special reperator for the occupied
Palestinian territories. Franchesca
Albanazi has been critical of Israel's
genocide in Gaza and has voiced support
for the international criminal court's
efforts to try Israeli leaders. On
Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco
Rubio accused her of anti-semitism.
Amnesty International called the
decision a graceful affront to
international justice. Well, Marco Rubio
posted on X saying, "I'm imposing
sanctions on UN Human Rights Council,
Special Raptor Franchesca Albanz for her
illegitimate and shameful efforts to
prompt international criminal court
action against US and Israeli officials,
companies, and executives." He also said
her campaign of political and economic
warfare against the United States and
Israel will no longer be tolerated.
Well, joining us is Franchesca Alban,
the UN special reporter on the occupied
Palestinian territory. She's in the
Slovenian capital, Ljubljana. Miss
Albanese, always a pleasure to have you
with us on Alazer. Thank you for your
time. Uh firstly, your initial reaction
to these sanctions and can you talk us
through exactly what they are?
I cannot because uh I I'm still
evaluating the impact. Uh, of course
it's uh I agree I'm happy that the human
rights council, members of the human
rights council and the office of the
argon, the UN, the human rights
community has reacted criticizing and
asking for uh the reversal of these
measures because it's obscene frankly.
Uh but right now I want to remind
everyone that the reason why these
sanctions have been imposed uh is the
pursuit of justice. Of course, I've been
critical of Israelis has been committing
genocide and crimes against humanity and
war crimes and not because I say that
there are criminal proceedings and
international court of justice
proceedings against Israel for these uh
crimes. Isn't it enough? And what I've
exposed is that this genocide doesn't
only go ahead because of the
relinquished territorial ambitions of
Israel or because of ideological
affinity of some groups with what Israel
is doing, but also because there are
companies who are profiting from it. And
excuse me, I mean, I record the the
offensive and rude posture that has come
from some of these companies in reaction
to to my report like uh Google. But and
I I mean look I'm also a user of Google.
I don't I don't want the end of Google.
I want Google to stop being uh I mean
making profits by supporting a
government that has killed 60,000 people
including 18,000 children. Is it too
much to ask? So, of course, the
sanctions are going to to affect me and
they are not going to stop my quest for
respect of justice and international law
as I've been mandated to do by the Human
Rights Council.
A lot to pick up on from what you've
said. You said that you're still
evaluating the impact of the sanctions.
Uh, do you know, for example, if you
will be denied visas to the US, how it's
going to impact your work? you know, if
you can't go to UN headquarters in New
York, for example.
Well, the fact that I cannot go to the
UN in uh in New York seems to be a
smaller problem that the Palestinians in
Gaza being killed uh by something that
is called the Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation, which in fact is a death
trap, which has completely obliterated
the concept of humanitarian action that
should have been um
the the provided by or taken uh by the
United Nations. I mean, let's talk about
serious issues. Let's talk about the
fact that the genocide continues while
you and I are been talking. This is what
I'm worried about. And are you worried
how the sanctions might affect your work
pursuing justice hold trying to hold
Israel and whoever is supporting Israel
whether it's the United States or these
companies? How worried are you about how
those sanctions will impact that work in
Gaza and the West Bank?
I think it depends. It depends. This is
a moment a defining moment in history.
It's such a m a turning point and moment
of reckoning. So I've I've said uh these
intimidation techniques remind me very
much of the of mafia intimidation
techniques. Silencing first of all um
destroying the reputation and then
intimidating and then uh threatening
anyone who dares to denounce the system
the collusion between political and
economic and financial interests. You
know, I come from a place that has been
plagued by this kind of logic. Uh, a
place where judges, lawyers, activists
from Pepin Past to Joavanni Valone and
and Paulo Bcelino have been killed for
their stance on the side of justice. So,
I know what people risk when they stand
against
big powers. But what I also know is
lessons that come from my from my part
of the world is that these techniques
work only if they manage to silence the
people. If the people stand united and
denounce and push back the again these
winds or only these sanctions will only
work uh if people are scared and stop
engaging on justing the chilling effect.
I've been told, "Oh, don't talk about
the ICC." 30 minutes later, I was
expressing my solidarity with the ICC.
Why? Because the ICC is doing the right
thing. It's investigating war crimes and
crimes against humanity and should have
actually should have started before. We
we probably wouldn't be where we are
today. Together, we can stop this
disgrace, but we need to awaken and
stand united against it. That is the UN
special reperator on the occupied
Palestinian territories. Franchesca
Albanz, thank you so much for joining us
today to talk uh about what's going on
personally and professionally with you.
We appreciate it.
Make sure to subscribe to our channel to
get the latest news from Algera.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:50 pm

Francesca Albanese “Israel is responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history”
UN Palestinian Rights Committee
Jul 7, 2025 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT GENEVA

In her address to the Human Rights Council on 3 July 2025, Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, warned of a genocide unfolding in Gaza and the West Bank. She described the situation as “apocalyptic,” stating that “Israel is responsible for one of the cruelest genocides in modern history.” With over 200,000 Palestinians reported killed or injured and the real toll “far higher,” she accused Israel of dismantling humanitarian aid in Gaza, replacing it with a “so-called 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' [that] is nothing else than a death trap.” She emphasized that this was not an isolated crisis but part of a decades-long “settler colonial project of erasure” that has intensified in recent months through military force, starvation, and mass displacement.

Albanese condemned the deep complicity of corporate and state actors in what she called an “economy of genocide.” She detailed how arms manufacturers, surveillance firms, banks, tech giants, and universities profit from the occupation, while “colonies spread, financed by banks and insurers, powered by fossil fuels and normalized by tourism platforms.” She stressed that this is not just about “wrongful conduct” but about a global system that sustains apartheid and enables ethnic cleansing. Citing international legal obligations, she called for a “full arms embargo on Israel,” suspension of trade agreements, and immediate disengagement from any business activity contributing to international crimes. “What I exposed is not a list, it is a system,” she said, urging the world to act before it’s too late: “What comes next depends on all of us... It’s not a question of if, it’s just a question of when.”



Transcript

I address you today with a sense of
foreboding that words can hardly capture.
I no longer know what more can be said.
14 months ago, I warned that this
genocide marked an escalatory stage of a
longstanding settler colonial project
over Asia, one that has targeted the
Palestinian people for over seven
decades. And now it is happening and we
must stop it. The situation in the
occupied Palestinian territory is
apocalyptic. In Gaza, people continue to
endure suffering beyond imagination.
Israel is responsible for one of the
crulest genocides in modern history.
Official figures count over 200,000
killed or injured. Leading hell experts
estimate that true toll is far higher.
As the cost to the Palestinian people
grows, Israel has dismantled the last
function of the UN in Gaza. humanitarian
aid. Its so-called Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation is nothing else than a death
trap engineered to kill or force the
flight of a starved, bombarded,
emasiated population marked for
elimination.
Meanwhile, in the West Bank,
Palestinians continue to face the
largest wave of force displacement since
1967.
Nearly 1,000 have been killed, 10,000
injured, 10,000 detained, many tortured,
while armed settlers rampage, and 900
checkpoints and other obstacles choke
daily life. As Palestinians are
abandoned to their faith, I must ask
you, those of you with a diplomatic
presence in the occupied Palestinian
territory, what do your colleagues
report? What is your presence for if not
to confirm what I'm saying and act to
stop it in accordance with international
law?
At the same time, since October 2023,
the Tel Aviv stock exchange has soared
by 213%
in US dollars, amassing,
sorry, amassing 225.7
billion US dollars in in market gains,
including
67.8
billion in the last month alone. One
people enriched, one people erased.
Israel has used the genocide as an
opportunity to test new weapons,
customized surveillance, lethal drones,
rudder systems, and other unmanned
technology to exterminate a population
without restraint. While Elbit Systems
wins Israeli Ministry of Defense award
for innovation,
Loid Martin and the global web of 1000
1,650
other companies benefit from Israel
flying the F35 Father jets for the first
time in beast mode, carrying four times
the ordinance up to 22,000 pounds than
when operating in stealth mode. It is
its very defenselessness that has made
the people and the land of Palestine an
ideal laboratory for the Israeli
military-industrial complex. The forever
occupation has provided an optimal
testing ground testing ground for arms
manufacturers and big tech with little
oversight and zero accountability while
investors, private and public
institutions have profited handsomely. I
once thought the problem was ignorance,
a lack of understanding about Palestine
and its history. Later, I saw the
ideology at play, the deep political
affinity many states and elites hold
with the state of Israel. But in the
face of genocide, so visible, so
ostentatious, so live streamed, these
explanations fall short. My term as a
special reportorter, including the first
the first opposition to my mandate, and
this report in particular, reveals a
darker truth. Some states support Israel
to preserve their regional dominance,
creating the material conditions that
sustain its settler colonial project and
make it succeed. In fact, and it's in
this bigger scheme, a web of corporate
actors are deeply deeply imshed in an
underlying economy, helping displaced
indigenous Palestinians and replace them
with Israeli settlers in what remains of
their land.
This report exposes the economic
conditions driving and enabling Israel's
machinery of displacement through
destruction, segregation, and
surveillance of the Palestinians and
replacement through the construction of
alternative landscapes. economies and
realities for the settlers, their
visitors and associates. From arms
manufacturers, tech giants, banks,
energy firms, online platforms,
supermarkets, and universities,
corporate actors have supplied the
tools, financing, and infrastructure.
The legitimacy for these machinery over
Asia, weapons and data system brutalized
and surveiled Palestinians. Colonies
spread financed by banks and insurers
powered by fossil fuels and normalized
by tourism platforms, supermarket chains
and academic institutions.
All have helped entrenched apartheid and
enabled the slow inexurable destruction
of Palestinian life. Corporate entities
entangled in this ecosystem have long
been on notice. Their products, services
and corporate relationship directly
linked them to an economy of occupation
that has function in violation of
permparytory norms. The for Geneva
Convention and the Rome Stad under the
UN guiding principles on business and
human rights. Even this minimal
connection triggers a clear
responsibility to use their leverage to
end abuse. But in this context of
Palestine, we are not talking about
isolated specific incidents of wrongful
conduct. The severity of the structural
and sustained violations and crimes at
tissue has been confirmed by the
International Court of Justice and has
led to arrest warrants being issued by
the International Criminal Court.
In this context, what action could be
possibly s could be could possibly be
sufficient to rectify these violations
and the corporate connection to them?
The answer is simple. There is a
primaasia responsibility on every state
and corporate entity to completely
abstain from or end their relationship
with this economy of the occupation
especially as it has transformed into an
economy of genocide.
In the face of all this, too few have
disengaged in the last tw 21 months.
Armed companies have turned nearrecord
profits by equipping Israel with
cuttingedge weaponry to unleash 85,000
tons of explosives, six times the power
of Hiroshima on Gaza. The companies
provide the dual use infrastructure that
is utilized as a weapon of mass
targeting and killing. The machinery of
the global construction equipment giants
is raising Gaza to the ground,
preventing the return and reconstruction
of Palestinian life. Global energy
conglomerates have fueled these assaults
with coal, coal, oil, gas, while the
same infrastructure has been deprived to
the Palestinians. No water, no
electricity, creating the conditions of
life life calculated to destroy. While
major global banks have underwritten and
purchased Israeli Treasury bonds,
bankrolling the devastation at the time
of caping military budget deficits and
plummeting credit rating. The 40
entities named in my report alongside
their parents, subsidiary, licences and
franchises are just the tip of the
iceberg illustrative of this system that
entangles many many more. What I exposed
is not a list. It is a system and it is
to be addressed. Now my expectation is
that OC, the OCHR database, the working
group on business and human rights and
lawyers, investigative journalists and
prosecutors globally will take this
framework and secure that states what
states have failed to achieve
accountability and we must reverse the
tide. As I conclude, let me say member
states must impose a full arms embargo
on Israel, suspend all trade agreements
and investment relations, and enforce
accountability, ensuring that corporate
entities face legal consequences for
their involvement in serious violations
of international law. and corporate
entities must urgently seize all
business activities and terminate
relationship directly linked
contributing to and causing human rights
violations and international crimes
against the Palestinian people. At this
existential moment for the Palestinian
people, trade unions, lawyers, civil
society groups, and ordinary citizens
should encourage such behavioral change
from the side of corporate entities and
governments by pressing for boycots,
divestment, sanctions, and
accountability.
What comes next depends on all of us.
And I truly believe that together we can
make it. It's not a question of if, it's
just a question of when. Thank you.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:52 pm

"Unilateral Targeted Sanctions Are Unacceptable!" – UN Slams US Sąnctions on Frąncesca Albąnese.
The Africa News Network
Jul 11, 2025



Transcript

Thank you, Steph. Um, does the secretary
general support Francesa Albanesi on a
personal level?
Look, the I think the secretary general
respects the work of all UN human rights
uh reporters. Their work is extremely
important. It's an extremely important
part of the uh of the human rights
arctic architecture.
This is his point is that targeted
unilateral sanctions against UN
officials against UN experts which Miss
Albanese is are just unacceptable.
And has the secretary general sent any
communique or anything? I don't uh we're
in the process of u answering a letter
uh from Ambassador Shay. Uh Javier
uh on the same issue Steph did she plan
to come to New York
Miss Alan in the coming
I I don't know you you'd have to ask her
our human rights colleagues
if she comes the is will she be able to
enter the the the country and to access
the United Nations to brief security
I mean the the access to the building is
not an issue access to where the UN
office is it's in this particular case
in New York is um is the has to do with
with the United States. They grant the
visas. Uh the US uh there is a host
country agreement in which they are um
uh they are bound to facilitate uh the
travel of UN officials, experts and
diplomats just uh like headquarters
agreements that we have in in other
places where we have head headquarters.
Benny then if to
so a couple of questions first of all
Benzi uh there there have been some uh
condemnations by other countries other
than the US of her work as anti-semitic
uh including um France which you
mentioned in the um
in the context of uh July 14. Um,
does that enter into uh the calculation
of the uh unacceptable
line?
Look, the secretary general is not in
the business of commenting on the work
of the special reporters. They're
independent.
Those mandates are given to them by
member states. Um, special reporators as
I told Gabriel have an important role to
play in the human rights architecture.
If people are un if member states are
unhappy with the work of special
reporters. Um, and
frankly if you look at the the series of
special reporters who have country uh
based or thematic based men, there are a
lot of member states who are not happy
with one or different special reporters
at different times. That's their right.
But our message is engage diplomatically
with the UN human rights architecture
and don't uh issue uh targeted
sanctions.
Uh on another topic in your chronicling
of uh West Bank issues. I'm I'm sorry if
I missed that because I was like looking
at something else. But did you mention
today's murder of an Israeli in
um in Goshion? Uh I it's not in my
reporting but I can tell you that we
condemn the killings of all civilians
whether they be Israelis or
Palestinians.
You did talk about uh violence by
settlers but this was violence by
anti-settlers. If if I can if I can uh
refer you back to uh the various uh
regular reports by senior officials to
the security council, violence uh
against civilians is routinely condemned
whether it's conducted by Israelis or
Palestinians.
Yeah, but you you talk today not in
various reports. You talk today about
I'm just telling you and you do as you
do every day, but you fail to mention
this one. Well, you know, I think that's
the one thing you and Abdah Hamid will
agree on is I failed to mention
everything that can please either one of
you. Asam,
thank you. A follow up on Albani. the
human rights watch um issued a statement
on this issue and I'm going to read on
um and I'm going to read one line in
which they say uh UN and ICC member
countries should strongly resist the US
government's shameless efforts to block
justice for the world's worst crimes.
I I this is human or human rights watch
or human watch.
Human rights.
Oh, human right. Okay. Sorry. Sorry.
I've switched gears then. Okay.
No, human rights watch. Uh so in their
statement they also say that um um
that government should strongly resist
uh the word and condemn the outrageous
sanction on Albanzi. So I guess my
question here um the following these
attacks on Albanese comes uh they are
not isolated. They there were attacks
against Honorwa, attacks against Navy P
and her um committee
um um inter like um any human rights
even UN human rights are not able to uh
get visas to um uh to Israel
international stuff
etc. So what is the is and if you
remember also Israel actually uh
declared few years ago six uh you
Palestinian human rights organization
and human rights and um humanitarian
organizations as terrorist organizations
and yet
we have constantly the reaction from
your office. Yes, you you don't agree
with these uh uh steps that taken by US
or Israel. Uh but there is no clear
public condemnations
and what are you doing? What is the
secretary going to do to protect Albani
and Nav'i P and all these human rights
workers from
with with due due respect? I think what
I read out today was pretty was pretty
clear. Um, I'm not going to disagree
with the points uh the examples that
you've raised, but you know, let's take
a step back and and and look at the the
attacks on the UN human rights
architecture
uh across the board. Um there are a lot
of countries
um who face uh country mandates who
don't allow their special operators to
get in. Uh we had the case of Venezuela
not too long ago that expelled our human
rights uh colleagues and I think this
folds into what the secretary general
referred to uh 10 days ago when he spoke
about the charter and saying that it was
really unacceptable for member states to
have an alocquart approach to the
charter to have an alocart approach uh
to the UN's um human rights architecture
which was not drawn up by Antonio
Gutierrez. It was drawn up by member
states themselves. All of these member
states have put their signature to this
system, engage with it, work with it. U
that is our message. Yes sir.
Hi. So, reports have come out that the
intergovernmental organization bricks is
increasingly trying to challenge the US
dollar and the US-led economic order to
which President Donald Trump publicly
responded by threatening to impose
tariffs on any state that allies with or
complies with this block. My question to
you is, has the secretary general been
in contact with any lead officials of
bricks since their recent summit? and
does he view their attempted expansion
as beneficial or harmful to
international peace?
Secretary General was at the at the
brick summit as you as you well know um
you know it's not the role of the
secretary general to get involved in uh
payment systems and and and all those
things but I think his message has been
um has been very clear. We do not want
to see more divisions in the global
economic system in the global trade
system. Again, as for human rights,
there is a global trade architecture
that was created by member states. Use
that, work with it, and ensure that it
is fair to all. Abdel Hamid,
thank you. Uh,
Albanese
put a report to the human right council.
It's called from
Yes.
the economy of occupation to the economy
of uh genocide. Mhm.
In fact, it mentioned number of
companies like IBM, Microsoft and others
who helping Israel with committing this
war of genocide.
Does the SG
feel that what these information are
valid and it should be highlighted and
he should express his concern about
these companies?
It is I mean doesn't need the SG to be
highlighted. I think it's getting quite
a lot of coverage uh as it is. Again, I
the secretary general is not going to be
drawn into uh commenting on on the work
of these independent reporters. I think
his message to the private sector uh as
it always has been is that the private
sector has a critical role to play uh in
ensuring that human rights are respected
in their day-to-day work.
Thank you. Uh my second question, 82
Palestinians were killed in the last 24
hours. And by the way, the guy the man
who was killed in
is a soldier and is not a civilian. I'm
sorry to say that, but I have to say,
okay, but 82 Palestinians, including
those who were lining for food near the
GHF. So now the number had reached over
57,700
Palestinian killed and 137,000 wounded.
You normally remind us of the numbers.
Why?
I mean, Abdam, with all due respect, I I
I talked about what happened today. I
talked about the children that were
killed waiting to get nutritional
supplement. We condemn their killing. I
I I convey to you the information um
that that that I have. Uh, Alex,
thanks Steph. Uh, firstly on Iran, is
there any prog progress between Iran and
IAA on Iran nuclear issue?
Uh, please call Vienna.
All right. Uh, secondly, quick follow up
on Miss Albanza. So, just to make it
clear,
sorry, go ahead.
As on Miss Albanza, as for now, we don't
know what are the consequences of these
sanctions will be, right? Is it correct?
Well, my my understanding from what I've
seen publicly reported is that she will
not be allowed she unlikely to receive a
visa to come to the United States.
Uh, can I have one more? Oh,
please.
Y Russia's Lavro met with uh Secretary
Rubio today. Have any comments on that?
As you know, my standard comment, we
always welcome dialogue.
Thank you.
Excellent. Evelyn,
did you have a question?
Yes.
Yes, please go ahead.
I have a couple of I have a couple
questions. Uh, first of all, on Miss
Albanazi,
I I uh have read every single word she's
written. I find her
full of errors, anti-semitic.
But what is what is your what is your
what is your question?
Yeah. So my question is I don't see how
anyone who's such a bad researcher and
has no nuances cannot can be admired.
And secondly, on Russia,
does Russia give the United Nations any
explanation of how killing innocent
civilians will help their conquest of
I mean, I think if you're looking for
member states to explain their position,
I would encourage you to read what they
tell the security council.
Yes, ma'am.
Um, so
I didn't understand your answer. what
I'm saying it's not I mean the I think
the Russia like other countries explains
its position when on debate on Ukraine
in the security council so I would
encourage you to read what they say yes
ma'am
I think uh following uh Al Ban's report
the UN did receive a lot of response
being called like including um Google
co-founder Sergey Brin called the United
Nations transparently anti-Semic in
response to the report does Yun have any
response I can tell you I can I speak
for the secretary general and I think
his record on speaking out against
anti-semitism
uh is unimpeachable and from the time
he's been secretary general to his
previous roles including as prime
minister of Portugal.
It's okay. Don't be sorry because I know
you're not. But go ahead. It's not, you
know, I I just I mean there is a lot of
conflating of criticizing the government
of Israel and anti-semitism
uh especially from those who uh
criticize especially who are not happy
with different um organizations
including actually Israeli organizations
who are highlighting the human rights
violations in Israel and um etc. So, um,
does the secretary general believe that
criticizing the government of Israel is
anti-semitic? And when are you Yeah,
I think people need to have the
intellectual bandwidth
to separate anti-semitisms
from legitimate criticism of the actions
of the government of Israel. Abdel Hamid
and then Benny.
Thank you. I hope to I hope you will be
patient with me. Two questions. when the
settlers today conducted a wedding
inside Ibrahimi mosque in Hebbr. Is that
a human? Is that a civilization?
I'm not aware of that specific case, but
I think we've spoken extensively about
the issues of settlers. My second
question is the SG worried about the
world we live in when an uh uh when a
superpower tried to impose its uh vision
on other countries like President Trump
asking Brazil to drop the charges
against Bolsinaro. They he asked Israel
also not to try Netanyahu. He imposes
sanctions on UN officials and ICC
Albanzi and many others. what kind of a
word that the SG can
well I mean I I think listen if you look
at the SG's recent comments as I alluded
to uh uh to to some uh his view on where
the charter uh is and the respect for
the charter is I think you can draw your
own conclusions and I think if you look
at uh most of the his general assembly
speeches and how they start they don't
really start by painting a rosy picture.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting

Postby admin » Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:55 pm

US sanctions UN expert Albanese over Gaza reporting
Al Jazeera English
Al Jazeera is funded in whole or in part by the Qatari government. Wikipedia
119,428 views Jul 9, 2025 #FrancescaAlbanese #MarcoRubio #IsraelGazaWar

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has announced sanctions will be imposed on UN special rapporteur for Palestine Francesca Albanese for her investigations into Israel’s war on Gaza.
“Albanese’s campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated. We will always stand by our partners in their right to self-defence,” said Rubio.

Albanese this week hit out at countries that allowed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to fly over their airspace en route to the United States, suggesting they may have flouted their obligations under international law.

Last week, Albanese called on countries to cut off all trade and financial ties with Israel, including a full arms embargo, and withdraw international support for what she called an “economy of genocide”.

“The situation in the occupied Palestinian territory is apocalyptic,” she said. “Israel is responsible for one of the cruellest genocides in modern history.”
Albanese has repeatedly criticised Israel’s deadly 21-month attack on Gaza, and the military and political support given by its allies.



Transcript

Well, the Trump administration has
imposed sanctions on Franchesca
Albanazi, the UN special reperator for
the occupied Palestinian territories.
Alanazi has been critical of Israel's
war on Gaza and has called for
international pressure on Israel,
including through sanctions. In the past
hour, the US Secretary of State Marco
Rubio posted on X saying, "I imposing
sanctions on UN Human Rights Council
special reporter Franchesca Albanesi for
her illegitimate and shameful efforts to
prompt international criminal court
action against US and Israeli officials,
companies, and executives." He also said
her campaign of political and economic
warfare against the United States and
Israel will no longer be tolerated.
Rosalyn Jordan, you're joining us from
Washington DC. Tell us more about uh the
reaction the US is having to the UN
special reperator.
Well, there's now the formal statement
uh from the secretary of state who is
traveling to the ACSEAN summit in
Malaysia at this hour. And I'm quoting
from Marco Rubio's statement. Albani has
spewed unabashed anti-semitism,
expressed support for terrorism, and
open contempt for the United States,
Israel, and the West. Continuing that
bias has been apparent across the span
of her career, including recommending
that the IC without a legitimate basis
issue arrest warrants targeting Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and
former Defense Minister Yo Galant.
continuing. She has recently escalated
this effort by writing threatening
letters to dozens of entities worldwide,
including major American companies
across finance, technology, defense,
energy, and hospitality, making extreme
and unfounded accusations, and
recommending the IC pursue
investigations and prosecutions of these
companies and their executives. We will
not tolerate these campaigns of
political and economic warfare which
threaten our national interests and
sovereignty. So in essence that's the
justification according to the secretary
of state Marco Rubio for these new
sanctions against Franchesca Alani. It
is uh assumed that this means that she
will not be able to get a visa to come
to the United States to continue her
work even though she is uh working with
the United Nations and generally visas
are granted for persons who were going
to the UN headquarters in New York. It
also means that uh likely if she has any
financial or real property interests
here in the United States that she will
not be able to access them. And finally,
usually sanctions of this nature include
uh punishments for people and entities
that engage with her because of the
sanctions against Franchesca Albani.
Okay, thank you so much Rosen Jordan
reporting from Washington DC.
Now the US,
make sure to subscribe to our channel to
get the latest news from Alazer.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 37648
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Next

Return to A Growing Corpus of Analytical Materials

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests