Data set 1 - 8

There is no shorter route to power than through the genitals of male leaders. This principle guided the Lolita Gambit, played by the Mossad through its "Agent" Jeffrey Epstein

Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Sat Dec 20, 2025 10:35 pm

DOJ Disclosures
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-disclosures

Privacy Notice


In view of the Congressional deadline, all reasonable efforts have been made to review and redact personal information pertaining to victims, other private individuals, and protect sensitive materials from disclosure. That said, because of the volume of information involved, this website may nevertheless contain information that inadvertently includes non-public personally identifiable information or other sensitive content, to include matters of a sexual nature. In the event a member of the public identifies any information that should not have been posted, please notify us immediately at [email protected] so we can take steps to correct the problem as soon as possible.

Redactions of victim names and other identifying information have been applied. In audio files, redactions of victim names and other identifying information have been implemented through the use of a steady, solid tone.

Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R.4405)

Data Set 1

Download all files (.zip)
View files

Data Set 2

Download all files (.zip)
View files

Data Set 3

Download all files (.zip)
View files

Data Set 4

Download all files (.zip)
View files

Data Set 5

Download all files (.zip)
View files

Data Set 6

Download all files (.zip)
View files

Data Set 7

Download all files (.zip)
View files

Data Set 8

Download all files (.zip)
View files

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00009802.pdf
Based on the attached search warrant returns, it looks like from the New York mansion (the PDF) there are approximately 40 devices that would have storage (computers, hard drives, thumb drives, etc.) and that's not even counting at least 60+ CDs. And then from the Virgin Islands (the Excel spreadsheet), at least more than 25 devices, including multiple servers / server racks....

Just generally, and and I talked about this last week too, but it's basically impossible for us to keep track of what
we're getting, and what has been completed, without some kind of identification or labeling system, along with a list of
which devices have been extracted and downloaded.
EFTA00009805
So for example on the hard drive currently, there are 38 folders labeled "loadFiles" through "37loadFiles" with a modified
date of 11/14/19, which I think we may have already previously received — but I'm not sure, because we haven't gotten
any info on which folders match up to which devices, etc. And then there's another folder titled "NYC024362" that has a
modified date of 1/27/20, so I think that may be the materials we hadn't previously received? That folder by itself has
more than 600,000 items.

I don't want to give anything that we've already previously received and uploaded, and I can't tell from the folder or
file names whether everything on the drive is new, or whether just additional materials were saved onto it in addition to
what we already have. =, are you able to give us some guidance on this? Ultimately what we really need is a
spreadsheet of every device, whether it's been dumped (or partially dumped), and then identifying that same info —
which device, and what materials from it — are being given to us with each data transfer. Otherwise I think
organizationally and for review purposes it will be a total disaster for us.


https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00009941.pdf

Sorry it has taken so long, but we are talking about terabytes worth of data over multiple forms of digital
evidence.
Phones, tablets, loose media, cameras, DVRs, servers, laptops, and desktop computers. We have
gotten past encryption on multiple devices.


https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-1-files
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-2-files
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-3-files
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-4-files
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-5-files
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-6-files
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-7-files
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-dis ... et-8-files
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 6:56 pm

DATA SET 8 FILES

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009809.pdf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
x.
SEALED
INDICTMENT
19 Cr.
19CRIM 490
COUNT ONE
(Sex Trafficking Conspiracy
The Grand Jury charges:
OVERVIEW
1. As set forth herein, over the course of many
years, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, sexually exploited and
abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New .
York, and Palm Beach, Florida, among other locations.
2. In particular, from at least in or about 2002, up
to and including at least in or about 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and
recruited, minor girls to visit his mansion in Manhattan, New
York (the "New York Residence") and his estate in Palm Beach,
Florida (the "Palm Beach Residence") to engage in sex acts with
him, after which he would give the victims hundreds of dollars
in cash. Moreover, and in order to maintain and increase his
supply of victims, EPSTEIN also paid certain of his victims to
recruit additional girls to be similarly abused by EPSTEIN. In
EFTA0000

this way, EPSTEIN created a vast network of underage victims for
him to sexually exploit in locations including New York and
Palm Beach.
3. The victims described herein were as young as 14
years old at the time they were abused by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, and were, for various reasons, often particularly
vulnerable to exploitation. EPSTEIN intentionally sought out
minors and knew that many of his victims were in fact under the
age of 18, including because, in some instances, minor victims
expressly told him their age.
4. in creating and maintaining this network of minor
victims in multiple states to sexually abuse and exploit,
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, worked and conspired with
others, including employees and associates who facilitated his
conduct by, among other things, contacting victims and
scheduling their sexual encounters with EPSTEIN at the New York
Residence and at the Palm Beach Residence.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
5. During all time periods charged in this
Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, was a financier with
multiple residences in the continental United States, including
the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.
6. Beginning in at least 2002, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and

recruited, dozens of minor girls to engage in sex acts with him,
after which EPSTEIN paid the victims hundreds of dollars in
cash, at the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.
7. In both New York and Florida, JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
the defendant, perpetuated this abuse in similar ways. Victims
were initially recruited to provide "massages" to EPSTEIN, which
would be performed nude or partially nude, would become
increasingly sexual in nature, and would typically include one
or more sex acts. EPSTEIN paid his victims hundreds of dollars
in cash for each encounter. Moreover, EPSTEIN actively
encouraged certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to
be similarly sexually abused. EPSTEIN incentivized his victims
to become recruiters by paying these victim-recruiters hundreds
of dollars for each girl that they brought to EPSTEIN. In so
doing, EPSTEIN maintained a steady supply of new victims to
exploit.
The New York Residence
8. At all times relevant to this Indictment, JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, the defendant, possessed and controlled a multi-story
private residence on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, New York,
i.e., the New York Residence. Between at least in or about 2002
and in or about 2005, EPSTEIN abused numerous minor victims at
the New York Residence by causing these victims to be recruited
to engage in paid sex acts with him.
9. When a victim arrived at the New York Residence,
she typically would be escorted to a room with a massage table,
where she would perform a massage on JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant. The victims, who were as young as 14 years of age,
were told by EPSTEIN or other individuals to partially or fully
undress before beginning the "massage." During the encounter,
EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of physical contact
with his victim to include, among other things, sex acts such as
groping and direct and indirect contact with the victim's
genitals. EPSTEIN typically would also masturbate during these
sexualized encounters, ask victims to touch him while he
masturbated, and touch victims' genitals with his hands or with
sex toys.
10. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates,
paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds
of dollars in cash for each encounter.
11. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that many of
his New York victims were underage, including because certain
victims told him their age. Further, once these minor victims
were recruited, many were abused by EPSTEIN on multiple
subsequent occasions at the New York Residence. EPSTEIN
sometimes personally contacted victims to schedule appointments
at the New York Residence. In other instances, EPSTEIN directed
employees and associates, including a New York-based employee
("Employee-I"), to communicate with victims via phone to arrange
for these victims to return to the New York Residence for
additional sexual encounters with EPSTEIN.
12. Additionally, and to further facilitate his
ability to abuse minor girls in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, asked and enticed certain of his victims to recruit
additional girls to perform "massages" and similarly engage in
sex acts with EPSTEIN. When a victim would recruit another girl
for EPSTEIN, he paid both the victim-recruiter and the new
victim hundreds of dollars in cash. Through these victimrecruiters, EPSTEIN gained access to and was able to abuse
dozens of additional minor girls.
13. In particular, certain recruiters brought dozens
of additional minor girls to the New York Residence to give
massages to and engage in sex acts with JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant. EPSTEIN encouraged victims to recruit additional
girls by offering to pay these victim-recruiters for every
additional girl they brought to EPSTEIN. When a victimrecruiter accompanied a new minor victim to the New York
Residence, both the victim-recruiter and the new minor victim
were paid hundreds of dollars by EPSTEIN for each encounter. In
addition, certain victim-recruiters routinely scheduled these
encounters through Employee-1, who sometimes asked the
recruiters to bring a specific minor girl for EPSTEIN.
The Palm Beach Residence
14. In addition to recruiting and abusing minor girls
in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, created a similar
network of minor girls to victimize in Palm Beach, Florida,
where EPSTEIN owned, possessed and controlled another large
residence, i.e., the Palm Beach Residence. EPSTEIN frequently
traveled from New York to Palm Beach by private jet, before
which an employee or associate would ensure that minor victims
were available for encounters upon his arrival in Florida.
15. At the Palm Beach Residence, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, engaged in a similar course of abusive conduct.
When a victim initially arrived at the Palm Beach Residence, she
would be escorted to a room, sometimes by an employee of
EPSTE1N's, including, at times, two assistants ("Employee-2" and
"Employee-3") who, as described herein, were also responsible
for scheduling sexual encounters with minor victims. Once
inside, the victim would provide a nude or semi-nude massage for
EPSTEIN, who would himself typically be naked. During these
encounters, EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of the
physical contact to include sex acts such as groping and direct
and indirect contact with the victim's genitals. EPSTEIN would
also typically masturbate during these encounters, ask victims
EFTA00
to touch him while he masturbated, and touch victims' genitals
with his hands or with sex toys.
16. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates,
paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds
of dollars for each encounter.
17. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that certain
of his victims were underage, including because certain victims
told him their age. In addition, as with New York-based
victims, many Florida victims, once recruited, were abused by
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, on multiple additional
occasions.
18. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, who during the
relevant time period was frequently in New York, would arrange
for Employee-2 or other employees to contact victims by phone in
advance of EPSTEIN's travel to Florida to ensure appointments
were scheduled for when he arrived. In particular, in certain
instances, Employee-2 placed phone calls to minor victims in
Florida to schedule encounters at the Palm Beach Residence. At
the time of certain of those phone calls, EPSTEIN and Employee-2
were in New York, New York. Additionally, certain of the
individuals victimized at the Palm Beach Residence were
contacted by phone by Employee-3 to schedule these encounter
19. Moreover, as in New York, to ensure a steady
stream of minor victims, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, asked
and enticed certain victims in Florida to recruit other girls to
engage in sex acts. EPSTEIN paid hundreds of dollars to victimrecruiters for each additional girl they brought to the Palm
Beach Residence.
STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS
20. From at least in or about 2002, up to and
including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York
and elsewhere, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known
and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire,
confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an
offense against the United States, to wit, sex trafficking of
minors, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section
1591(a) and (b).
21. It was a part and object of the conspiracy that
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known and unknown,
would and did, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce,
recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain, by any
means a person, and to benefit, financially and by receiving
anything of value, from participation in a venture which has
engaged in any such act, knowing that the person had not
attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in
commercial sex act, in violation of Title 18, United States
Code, Sections 1591(a) and (b)(2).
Overt Acts
22. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect
the illegal object thereof, the following overt acts, among
others, were committed in the Southern District of New York and
elsewhere:
a. In or about 2004, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, enticed and recruited multiple minor victims,
including minor victims identified herein as Minor Victim-1,
Minor Victim-2, and Minor Victim-3, to engage in sex acts with
EPSTEIN at his residences in Manhattan, New York, and Palm
Beach, Florida, after which he provided them with hundreds of
dollars in cash for each encounter.
b. In or about 2002, Minor Victim-1 was
recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly
sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the New York Residence over a
period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each
encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-1
to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she
did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim-1 how old she was, and Minor
Victim-1 answered truthfully.
c. In or about 2004, Employee-1, located in the
Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed
a telephone call to Minor Victim-1 in order to schedule an
appointment for Minor Victim-1 to engage in paid sex acts with
EPSTEIN.
d. In or about 2004, Minor Victim-2 was
recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly
sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over a
period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars after each
encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-2
to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she
did.
e. In or about 2005, Employee-2, located in the
Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed
a telephone call to Minor Victim-2 in order to schedule an
appointment for Minor Victim-2 to engage in paid sex acts with
EPSTEIN.
f. In or about 2005, Minor Victim-3 was
recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly
sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over a
period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each
encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-3
to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she
did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim-3 how old she was, and Minor
Victim-3 answered truthfully.
g. In or about 2005, Employee-2, located in the
Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed
a telephone call to Minor Victim-3 in Florida in order to
schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex
acts with EPSTEIN.
h. In or about 2004, Employee-3 placed a
telephone call to Minor Victim-3 in order to schedule an
appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with
EPSTEIN.
(Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.)
COUNT TWO
(Sex Trafficking)
The Grand Jury further charges:
23. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1
through 19 and 22 of this Indictment are repeated and realleged
as if fully set forth within.
24. From at least in or about 2002, up to and
including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New
York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, willfully and knowingly,
in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, did recruit,
entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain by any means a
person, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18
years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, and
did aid and abet the same, to wit, EPSTEIN recruited, enticed,
harbored, transported, provided, and obtained numerous
individuals•who were less than 18 years old, including but not
limited to Minor Victim-1, as described above, and who were then
caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act in
Manhattan, New York.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a).
(b) (2), and 2.)
FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS
25. As a result of committing the offense alleged in
Count Two of this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant,
shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1594(c)(1), any property, real and
personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to
facilitate the commission of the offense alleged in Count Two,
and any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from
any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of
the offense alleged in Count Two, or any property traceable to
such property, and the following specific property:
a. The lot or parcel of land, together with its
buildings, appurtenances, improvements, fixtures, attachments
and easements, located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New
York, with block number 1386 and lot number 10, owned by
Maple, Inc.
Substitute Asset Provision
26. If any of the above-described forfeitable
property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:
(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a
third person;
(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(e) has been commingled with other property which cannot
be subdivided without difficulty;
it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
853(p) and 28 U.S.C. S 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any
other property of the defendant up to the value of the above
forfeitable property.
(Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594; Title 21,
United States Code, Section 853(p); and
Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461.)
GEOFFREY . BERMAN
United States Attorney
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 7:25 pm

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009865.pdf

From: Sigrid McCawley
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 8:39 PM
To:
Cc: Sigrid McCawley
Subject: Filing

Hello Maureen,
I hope you are doing great. This is the statement that would like to submit. What format would you like me to send
it in? Should it be as a signed declaration? She is comfortable having it attributed to her name.
"I appreciate the opportunity to again be heard by the Court in this matter and once more request that Ghislaine
Maxwell not be released prior to her trial. I write this not only on behalf of myself, but all of the other girls and
young women who were victimized by Maxwell. Ghislaine Maxwell sexually abused me as a child and the
government has the responsibility to make sure that she stands trial for her crimes. I do not believe that will
happen or that any of her victims will see justice if she is released on bail. She has lived a life of privilege,
EFTA00009866
abusing her position of power to live beyond the rules. Fleeing the country in order to escape once more would
fit with her long history of anti-social behavior.
Drawing on my personal experience with Maxwell and what I have learned of how she has lived since that time,
I believe that she is a psychopath. Her abuse of me and many other children and young women is evidence of her
disregard for and violation of the rights of others. She has demonstrated a complete failure to accept to
responsibility in any way for her actions and demonstrated a complete lack of remorse for her central role in
procuring victims for Epstein. She was both charming and manipulative with me during the grooming process,
consistent with what many of her victims have described. She has frequently lied to others, including repeatedly
lying about me and my family. Maxwell has for decades lived a parasitic lifestyle relying on Epstein and others
to fund her lavish existence.
Maxwell has repeatedly demonstrated that her primary concern is her own welfare, and that she is willing to
harm others if it benefits her. She is quite capable of doing so once more. She will not hesitate to leave the
country irrespective of whether others will be on the hook financially for her actions because she lacks empathy,
and therefore simply does not care about hurting others. She would in fact be highly motivated to flee in order to
reduce the possibility of continued imprisonment, the conditions of which she has continuously complained. Her
actions over the last several years and choice to live in isolation for long periods suggest that being comfortable
is more important to her than being connected. Even more concerning, is if she is let out she has the ability to
once again abuse children and the painful consequences of that type of trauma can last a lifetime. I implore the
Court to make sure that Ghislaine Maxwell does not escape justice by keeping her incarcerated until her trial."
Sigrid McCawley
Partner
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 8:22 pm

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009920.pdf

From:
To: BOBBI
Cc:
Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:06:58 +0000
Bobbi,
Thank you for including me on this email. I understand from my conversation with MDC legal counsel today that MDC
staff is continuing to monitor temperatures throughout the facility, including in the area where Ms. Maxwell is housed. My
understanding is that the temperature where Ms. Maxwell is housed remains within the limits prescribed by BOP policy
and that the MDC does not expect this week's activities to affect the temperature in Ms. Maxwell's cell. That said, they will
continue to monitor the temperature and take appropriate action if it falls below prescribed limits.
As has previously been conveyed via letter from the Government to defense counsel dated October 8, 2020, the MDC's
assessment continues to be that Ms. Maxwell's current cell is the most appropriate placement for Ms. Maxwell both for her
safety and the security of the institution.
Finally, you have referenced a court order directing that certain steps be taken by the BOP. The only order of which I am
aware is Judge Nathan's order dated August 25, 2020, which denied Ms. Maxwell's request for an order concerning the
conditions of confinement at the MDC (See Dkt. No. 49 at 2-3). Please let me know if there is a different order to which
you are referring.

Best,
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
From: BOBBI C STERNHEIM
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 9:50 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Good afternoonI am informed that the NYC Dept. of Design & Construction will shut off
water and heat to the MDC from 9:00 pm to 5:00 am beginning tonight until 11/21.
I am further informed that the MDC will give inmates one bottle of water
and an extra blanket due to this disruption of services.
I am requesting that my client - Ghislaine Maxwell (02879-509)
be moved from her present isolation cell with two exterior walls to an interior cell.
Please explain why she cannot be moved to the cell in the
dayroom area where, by Court order, she is permitted to review discovery
from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm.

Thank youBobbi C. Sternheim
BOBBI C. STERNHEIM, ESQ.
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 8:30 pm

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009928.pdf

From: [DELETE]
To: [DELETE]
Cc: [DELETE]
Subject [DELETE]
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:55:48 +0000
She's done another [DELETE]in it she's said the following: I) She was interviewed by
FBI in 2011 by a [DELETE]in the interview she gave the names of all the girls she helped to traffic (2) she
was also interviewed by SDNY (no timeframe) (3) two other women also tell DOJ that Epstein specifically
trafficked them to "other men"

(4) there are cameras in the NYC house and others where he could watch people in bathrooms and elsewhere.
They plan to air it on the [DELETE]
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 8:35 pm

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009936.pdf

From: '[DELETE]
Cc: '[DELETE]
Subject: Epstein Update
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:32:05 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 2019-05-10 JE_status_memo_for ODAG.finaldocx.pdf
[DELETE]
Attached is an update on the progress of the Epstein investigation. Please keep this memo on close hold given the
sensitivity of the matter and our effort remain covert.

Feel free to let us know if you have any questions.
Regards,
[DELETE]

***

From: [DELETE] (USANYS)"[DELETE]
To: [DELETE] (USANYS)" [DELETE]
Cc: ' [DELETE] (USANYS)" [DELETE]
Subject: RE: the week ahead
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:25:48 +0000
The RMI team is going to the grand jury on Monday. Fraud signed off on the charge and charging document. [DELETE]
We're hoping to circulate and send down to NSD a bunch of paper on GEP, including a premises warrant for RG. I've
looked at a first draft already, and [DELETE] are working on a second draft now. I'm assuming, much as with
the memo we circulated last night, that everyone will want to see these, but if that's not the case, please let us know.
Bekah reviewed the first draft of the Hadden pros memo, which the team is now revising, and then one or both of us will
re-review. We hope to get that up to you at least next week. Team would like to go to the grand jury the week of August
24, with the primary time pressure coming from our desire to beat DANY.

I assume we'll be pressing ahead with a Menedez DAG fight but have not heard back on whether Audrey has yet to make
a call.
Also, we still have not heard back from [DELETE] or anyone on what we should be doing, if anything, to gather and review
material from the SDFL Epstein investigation. My sense is [DELETE] in particular, has been exploring an alternative plan
whereby we gather and review only SDFL's 24 boxes of hard copy documents, which I am fine with and agree is more
manageable, but we haven't and really can't take any action without a decision, so I'm very hopeful this is something we'll
get guidance on next week. On the list of things keeping me up at 3am, this is pretty consistently at or near the top...
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 8:52 pm

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009941.pdf

... Sorry it has taken so long, but we are talking about terabytes worth of data over multiple forms of digital
evidence. Phones, tablets, loose media, cameras, DVRs, servers, laptops, and desktop computers. We have
gotten past encryption on multiple devices....

...We have also encountered some very significant problems in trying to review the more than 1 million documents we
recently received
:...


...Here is a listing of what I have already handed over in load files to the US Attorney's Office for taint review. Some points of
clarification: There were 9 IDE hard drives found in the Manhattan apartment, they turned out to be 3 copies of 3 drives
(9 drives in total) from a July 2007 search on one of his properties. I only processed 3 (as they were all copies). All the
loose media from the NY apartment is included. All the Windows machines from the NY apartment are included. Only 2
Macs from NY and 1 from the Island are included.


***

The term "Epstein files" refers to documents collected as evidence in the criminal cases against Epstein and his associates, stored as over 300 gigabytes of data, plus other media, in the FBI's Sentinel case management system. They include his contacts book, flight logs of his planes, and court documents; some have been publicly released in redacted form.

-- Epstein files, by Wikipedia


300 Gigabytes (GB) vs. 300 Terabytes (TB)
Basic magnitude

1 Terabyte (TB) = 1,000 Gigabytes (GB) (decimal, storage-vendor convention)

300 TB = 300,000 GB

Therefore:

300 TB is exactly 1,000 times larger than 300 GB.

-- Chatgpt, 12/23/25

admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 9:21 pm

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009965.pdf

From: [DELETE]
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein lost interest in pregnant victim, made her recruit underage girls
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:47:28 +0000
Thanks. How much of this has she repeated in her interview with us?
From [DELETE]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 10:42 AM
To [DELETE]
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein lost interest in pregnant victim, made her recruit underage girls
This is [DELETE]whom we've spoken to.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 12, 2019, at 10:41 [DELETE] wrote:
https:Thypost.com/2019/09/12/jeffrey-epstein-lost-interest-in-pregnant-victim-made-her-recruit-underage-girls/
[DELETE]
[DELETE]
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
[DELETE]

Epstein convinced teen victim to be a recruiter after she became pregnant: Report
Postmedia News
Published: September 13, 2019
Updated: September 13, 2019 8:25 AM EDT
https://web.archive.org/web/20190916060 ... ant-report

[x]
U.S. financier Jeffrey Epstein appears in a photograph taken for the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services' sex offender registry March 28, 2017 and obtained by Reuters July 10, 2019.New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services / Handout / Reuters

One of Jeffrey Eptein’s alleged sexual abuse victims said she recruited dozens of underage girls for him after he lost interest in her when she became pregnant, the Daily Mail reported.

The woman, identified as L.M. in court papers obtained by the British tabloid, claimed she brought at least 70 girls to the pedophile’s home in exchange for baby shower gifts.

When she was between 13 and 16 years old, L.M. said she was paid hundreds of dollars every time she was brought to the American financier’s home to be sexually abused by him, according to the Daily Mail.

L.M. allegedly said that this happened more than 50 times between 2002 and 2004.

However, their sexual arrangement changed once she became pregnant because Epstein allegedly wasn’t interested in having sex with people who had given birth.

He allegedly convinced her to take on the role of a recruiter by purchasing all the gifts that were on her baby shower registry and had them delivered to her house by a female staff member.



L.M. was never charged for her role when Epstein was being investigated for sex trafficking.

The Daily Mail report also included six pages of a deposition in which L.M. described in graphic detail the sexual abuse she endured.

“He would ask the little girls I was with, ‘Hey, can I just see your vagina? Can I just see it?’ Even if they would say no,” she recalled.


The disgraced financier hanged himself in his Manhattan jail cell on Aug. 10 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges.

A U.S. federal judge formally dismissed the case against him close to three weeks after his suicide.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 9:36 pm

From: [DELETE] (USANYS) [DELETE]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 1:49 PM
To: [DELETE] (USANYS) [DELETE] (USANYS) [DELETE] [DELETE] [DELETE] [DELETE] [DELETE] [DELETE] [DELETE] [DELETE]
Cc: [DELETE] (USANYS) [Contractor) ; [DELETE] [DELETE] (USANYS)
Subject: 'I never touched the man,' Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate insists in letter to Daily News

I never touched the man,' Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate insists in letter to Daily News
NY Daily News
By Stephen Rex Brown
9/12/19
Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate proclaimed "I never touched the man" in a letter to the Daily News Thursday
as a probe into the multimillionaire perv's suicide continues.

Nick Tartaglione, a former Briarcliff Manor cop facing the death penalty for quadruple murder, insisted in a twopage handwritten note that he shared a cell at Metropolitan Correctional Center with Epstein because he posed
no threat to the accused sex trafficker of underage girls.
"As far as Jeff Epstein is concerned, I never touched the man. I despise anyone who hurts children but whatever
was going to happen to him, I was not going to be a part of it," Tartglione, 51, wrote from an 8-by-10-foot cell he
called The Box.
"The prison told Epstein they were putting him in a cell with me because they knew I would neither hurt nor
extort him. The staff here at MCC had hundreds of inmates to choose from yet I was their first choice,"

Tartglione wrote.
Epstein's first attempted suicide on July 23 in the cell he shared with Tartaglione. Sources previously told The
News that Tartaglione believed he may have saved Epstein's life by quickly alerting jail staff to the attempted
hanging.
Epstein, 66, was moved to suicide watch, separating him from Tartaglione. Sources said at the time that
investigators were trying to determine whether Tartaglione had assaulted Epstein.

The sex offender was subsequently taken off of suicide watch and hanged himself on Aug. 10 in a cell he
occupied alone.
He was awaiting trial on charges that carried a maximum sentence of 45 years in prison.
"At or around the time of his death we did not see a despairing or despondent person," Epstein's attorney Reid
Weingarten said at a recent hearing for the financier's victims.
The probe of how the pent with powerful friends managed to kill himself includes an examination of the first
attempt, prosecutors have said in court. Tartaglione's attorney Bruce Barket said he has not been interviewed by
investigators since Epstein's death.
"(Tartaglione) has not been questioned by any law enforcement official since July 23," Barket said.
"I can't imagine how they can claim a complete investigation without speaking to the person who was in the cell
in that first event."
A spokesman for the Southern District of New York declined comment.
Attorney General William Barr said "irregularities" have been uncovered at the nightmarish lockup. The jail staff
on duty at the time of Epstein's hanging were reportedly exhausted from working multiple overtime shifts and
failed to follow protocol. The MCC is also coping with longstanding staff shortages.

"I still have some faith in the justice system," Tartaglione wrote. "Every person in this country has the right to be
presumed innocent until proven guilty. To anyone who reads this I only ask for that presumption because I
haven't felt it yet in the past 33 months."
Tartaglione, who has long complained about conditions at MCC, is seeking to be transferred to another federal
lockup due to threats he says were made by jail staff after Epstein's suicide.

"It just doesn't seem appropriate that he be housed and guarded by the very people who are under investigation
given his proximity to the investigation," Barket said at a recent hearing.
"My client shouldn't have to fear for his life."

The attorney said he did not know his client had sent the letter until after it was in the mail. "It's a product of the
frustration at the entire situation," Barket said.
The musclebound ex-cop is charged with killing Martin Luna, 41, Hector Santiago, 32, Miguel Luna, 25, and
Hector Gutierrez, 43, in April 2016, as well as conspiring to distribute over five kilos of cocaine. Prosecutors say
two of the victims had ties to a Mexican drug cartel.
The four men's bodies were found buried on Tartaglione's sprawling animal rescue farm in Otisville, Orange
County.
Tartaglione has been locked up since December 2016 and still does not have a trial date.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Data set 1 - 8

Postby admin » Tue Dec 23, 2025 10:35 pm

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/D ... 009977.pdf

From:
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 8:27 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: RE:
In case you hadn't seen it yet. Notable was reference to the sealed Federal indictment. I hadn't realized that he
had already been indicted when he got the deal.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/04/politi ... index.html?
ehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F
Assistant Special Agent in Charge
New York Field Office

Millionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein apologizes in settling malicious prosecution suit
by Rosa Flores and Eliott C. McLaughlin
CNN
Updated 1430 GMT (2230 HKT) December 5, 2018
https://web.archive.org/web/20201112042 ... index.html

[x]
Labor secretary's past under scrutiny 03:07

(CNN) Multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein, an alleged serial sex abuser of girls, settled a lawsuit Tuesday, dodging the threat for now that several of his accusers would tell their stories in open court.

The case, which had been unfolding in Palm Beach County, Florida, Circuit Court for almost six years, ends a malicious prosecution counterclaim filed by attorney Bradley Edwards, who represented some of Epstein's accusers. Edwards filed the counterclaim after Epstein accused him and a now-disbarred attorney of wrongdoing in a civil lawsuit.

[x]
Inside Miami Herald's Jeffrey Epstein exposé 04:32

The settlement came as jury selection was set to begin. Expected to testify were at least seven alleged victims, law enforcement officers, former US attorneys and Epstein's former associates, said Michael Fisten, an investigator on Edwards' team.

The specifics of the settlement are confidential, but court records indicate Epstein issued an apology as part of the settlement. Epstein conceded in the apology that he tried to denigrate Edwards' reputation as a trial lawyer, Edwards said in a statement.

"The truth is that his aggressive investigation and litigation style was highly effective and therefore troublesome for me. The lawsuit I filed was my unreasonable attempt to damage his business reputation and stop Mr. Edwards from pursuing cases against me. It did not work," Epstein said in his apology, according to Edwards' statement.

The girls, many from poor backgrounds, were abused for years, Fisten said. The trial was one of two remaining opportunities for them to recount the alleged crimes against them publicly -- something that has never happened because the cases against Epstein have been settled, pleaded out or resulted in reduced charges.

How it began

In Epstein's original lawsuit, he alleged that Edwards and Scott Rothstein, a former lawyer now serving time after pleading guilty in 2010 to crimes involving a massive Ponzi scheme, committed a series of crimes, including fraud and racketeering, to unearth information about Epstein and his business associates.

The purpose, Epstein alleged, was "to defraud investors and support extortionate demands for payment from Epstein," the complaint says.

Edwards fired back in his counterclaim that Epstein was pursuing a malicious prosecution.

[x]
Jeffrey Epstein has been accused of serially abusing girls.

"Epstein's primary purpose in both filing and continuing to prosecute each of the claims against Edwards was to inflict maximum economic burden on Edwards in having to defend against the spurious claims, to distract Edwards from the prosecution of claims against Epstein arising out of Epstein's serial abuse of minors, and ultimately to extort Edwards into abandoning the claims he was prosecuting against Edwards," the counterclaim alleges.

The Miami Herald published a report last week saying that, when he was a US attorney, Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta gave Epstein the "deal of a lifetime" despite a federal investigation identifying 36 underage victims of the hedge fund manager. The Herald said it found about 80 women Epstein allegedly molested or sexually abused over a five-year period.

The report said Acosta forged a deal with one of Epstein's attorneys in which the multimillionaire pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges, ultimately serving only 13 months and avoiding a federal trial. The agreement, the Herald said, "essentially shut down an ongoing FBI probe" and further granted immunity to "any potential co-conspirators" in the case.


As part of the plea, Epstein registered as a sex offender and paid restitution to the victims identified by the FBI.

What the settlement means

For Acosta, who declined to comment Monday, the settlement short-circuits a trial that could have proved embarrassing as accusers who feel they were denied justice by the plea agreement would have taken the stand to tell graphic stories of Epstein's alleged abuse.

[x]
Miami Herald: Trump's labor chief accused of giving alleged pedophile 'deal of a lifetime' 03:09

Epstein's federal indictment, which was never made public because of the deal, will stay sealed, and no testimony will be heard from former US attorneys who could paint a clearer picture of the office culture that handed the plea deal to an alleged serial abuser.

The accusers will have one more shot at justice with a victims' rights lawsuit pending in federal court, which alleges the plea agreement didn't provide notice to the alleged victims as required by law.

They are hoping the judge vacates the plea agreement, which means the plea would no longer be valid and the current US attorney could prosecute Epstein.


CNN's Samira Said, Elizabeth Hartfield, Ross Levitt and Eli Watkins contributed to this report.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39749
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Next

Return to Sacrifice Virgins, Get World by the Balls: The Mossad's Lolita Gambit

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: admin and 2 guests