Trump Family Gets NASTY SURPRISE As Their International Corruption BACKFIRES!
Really American and U.S. Democratic Socialists
Jun 2, 2026 #trump #albania #trending
Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are facing MASSIVE BACKLASH As Their Corrupt Attempt to take over protected Albanian land in a $1.4 billion project to build luxury resorts, resulted in mass protests, corruption allegations and probes, and the Albanian Prime Minister's House being set ablaze in retaliation for him changing the law to allow the Trump Family to build what many are referring to as a "European Epstein Island" . . .
Transcript
back to my real estate roots, which has been a lot of fun. And I'm working on an incredible project with my husband in the Mediterranean.
The Trump family is getting hit with a nasty surprise today as their international corruption sparked a
global scandal. A luxury project linked to President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner has sparked protest in
Albania's capital where thousands of people took to the streets to protest against a luxury resort project.
Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner and his daughter Ivanka Trump are in the process of taking over protected Albanian land
in a $1.4 4 billion project to build luxury resorts because of course and an
Israeli linked development. The Albanian prime minister, this is where the corruption comes in, changed the law in
his country to allow this to happen. And now his house is burning.
This is insane levels of corruption. And you probably won't see much of this on the mainstream media because they think they can just get away with this in
foreign countries. So help us out here at Really American by sharing this important information around liking, subscribing, all the things. And let's
dive in here because that initial imagery may have seemed extreme if you don't know what is going on here. And I feel like a lot of people don't. This is
being being massively protest in Albania for a long time now. It's massive in scale.
I think that's an understatement. Can you explain it? There's no power on this island. You're building You're building everything from scratch, correct?
Well, it's an unbelievable, beautiful 1,400 hectare private island in the middle of the Mediterranean. We were on a friend's boat and we stopped for a
swim. Effectively, that's how we found it. We swam to the islands. We went on a hike barefoot all the way up to the top and we were just captivated.
Right. Great. So Ivanka and Jared Kushner get to start their own Epstein island sparking civil unrest across
Albania so they can make a few bucks I guess. And I want to show you where this is in case people don't know. This is
Albania. It's right next to Italy. You know this is over in Europe. And look at this. They are doing this. I'll show you the clip after in I forgive the
pronunciation. Vio norte protected area right here is Sesan Island part of what they're talking about. And like who the
[ __ ] says [ __ ] like that other than a [ __ ] Bond villain. Oh, we were out in the Mediterranean and I we jumped off our friend's boat and I saw this island and I was like, "Yeah, I want to
colonize the [ __ ] out of that." And forgive me for sounding hyperbolic and facitious here, but listen to this stuff. This is from David Miller for
from Tracking Power. Here's Ivanka Trump with the first level of her cover story for their purchase of Saison Island, which you just saw. That thing is huge,
in Albania, just across from the heel of Italy. It's a result of a lot of reflection on How I Want to Live, she says. And the second level of her cover
story, this is all from that interview, which gives in like just ick. The island hosts 3600
Soviet era tunnels and hardened bunkers built to withstand a nuclear attack.
Bunkers for end times billionaires. This is their plan for Albania. Luxury resort for their rich buddies. Once they finish
bribing Albanian officials and demined the island, they'll be able to host the ultra-wealthy PDF file Epstein class
again under the Trump brand in secret with no accountability and with bunkers they can use for their six fantasies and
experiments on okay now we're getting into conspiracy but like at this point like it's hard to even not give into that. And thankfully, Albanian
authorities are probing into this seaside resort, quote unquote. But you have to wonder if the Trump corruption
was able to get so far even in the United States. Like, think of how far it can go internationally. And right now,
the only people standing in the way are largely the people of Albania. Not the prime minister, the people. Now this
very project is planned to be built on several hectares of the protected Voza Narta coastal landscape in Zevu nets and on the uninhabited island of Suzan.
Environmental NOS's have long raised concerns that the project could very much threaten the area's biodiversity and disrupt bird migration roots. On
Monday, protesters uh chanted slogans while holding plards that read hands of Vioa Nata.
The situation in NA lagoon is that in practice we have a protected area but above all our state has allowed
construction work to continue without consultation and without transparency regarding what is happening in some of the most beautiful areas or in one of the last untouched regions of Europe.
Public alarm grew in early May when excavators began clearing pine forests and dunes to open new access roads and
construction sites. An activist who took part in the protest said that public outrage escalated after a video was circulated on social media that showed
what she said was an activist being forcibly removed from that very site.
Yeah. And both fortunately and unfortunately, I have that video of the activist being removed. Fair warning,
graphic content may be disturbing, but here it is.
That is [ __ ] sickening. That is an activist being dragged off of protected land so that Donald Trump's family can
go and start a construction for a real estate project for a luxury resort for their billionaire buddies. that is
definitely if not definitely then 99% most likely going to be some sort of billionaire escape similar to little
[ __ ] St. James and even if by some miracle that's not the case and that's not what happens. Here's someone pointing out why Albanians are so angry
about this even more so. Listen, this commenter on that video of the activist being yanked away says, "To those who don't seem to understand why these
people are upset about the Trump Kushner taking of their land and resources to build a luxury development, dot dot dot,
Saison Island is within the Caribouan Saison National Marine Park and is home to rare bird and marine species. It's a
protected area. This development is destroying protected habitat. It was used as a military base in the past and is considered a strategic coastal area.
There is a lot of local concern about foreign control of the island. And for this reason, as well as foreign influence, transparency of the process,
and environmental destruction, none of which the Trumps could give a flying
[ __ ] rat's ass about. So for [ __ ]
sake, can we please blast this out? Show that the Trump family is terrorizing the
rest of the world. All so they and their Epstein elite class can go have a [ __ ] island somewhere in Europe to did kids
probably. I'm not even one to give into conspiracy theories, but for [ __ ] sake, can we not forget about the
Epstein files and see this [ __ ] for what it is? You know, it's not even a business for me despite the scale of it.
We not only the island, but we have five miles of beachfront directly across from the island. This beautiful peninsula
with a lagoon on one side, the ocean on the other, um, beautiful white sand beaches. For me, this is it feels more
like a challenge than anything else. the the culmination of all of my experience in real estate, all of my travel, a lot
of reflection on how I want to live, how I think people increasingly are wanting to
PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN THE
Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN
by admin » Wed Jun 03, 2026 12:09 am
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 41051
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am
Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN
by admin » Wed Jun 03, 2026 1:08 am
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 41051
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am
Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN
by admin » Wed Jun 03, 2026 1:24 am
Part 1 of 2
Transcript
Huge breaking news. We have information now, confirmation that Iran
has fired a number of missiles towards a large number of countries in the Middle
East. Kuwait has been hit. At least 10 missiles were fired towards uh Kuwait.
Two of the possible targets that we're hearing is the US base Ali Al um air base in Kuwait and the other one was the
uh is it Arian air base in Kuwait as well. The US fifth fleet in Bahrain was
also targeted and hit. We heard multiple explosions. We also heard reports that there were explosions in Dubai as well.
We're going to be giving you the breaking news throughout this conversation. We're going to be obviously having on uh ex CIA Larry
Johnson come on the show as well. So, do me a favor, like this video. Let's try
and get as many people in here as possible. Very important news and we're going to be giving it to you throughout
the night. We have uh we have uh XCIA Larry Johnson, then we have XCIA Ray McGovern, and then we have Lieutenant
Anthony Aguilera and possibly more guests. but also live on other uh platforms as well. And so people may interrupt to give us some breaking news
as well. For example, right now we've heard uh Iran has continuously and in a
sustained manner attacked um Iranian Kurdish opposition groups in Iraqi Kurdistan for the last .
We also see US bases are on fire. I see here now US base uh in Kuwait is on fire. A US base in Kuwait is on fire.
Guy, if you guys, if you're on the YouTube, I do need you to do me a favor.
And that favor is to um like this video and get as many people in here as
possible. And as I'm looking down, whenever I look down, it is cuz I'm looking for some uh breaking news. And
this is breaking explosion
in uh just only interrupt guys, if you could do me a favor when there's some breaking news. Thank you. um to the people on the panel if you can cuz
normally I mute when I'm on YouTube but if you can just mute uh sorry if you can just open your mic when there's some
breaking news that would be marvelous uh just to keep the stream clear and going.
So breaking news um explosions in Bahrain there is confirmation Sencom
claiming that there was no strikes but there was indeed some strikes. We have got a statement from the IIGC and the statement from the IIGC is as follows.
And uh let me get that for you. And actually let me see if this works. And guys like I said like the video, share
the video and uh let everybody know that we're on this channel. Many people may not know that we're on this channel. We
have XCIA Larry Johnson coming on. And as we normally do, it's something we've always been known for is to provide the breaking news as and when we receive it.
So explo So yeah,
so there was explosions in Bahrain, Kuwait. We've heard some that there's explosions in Dubai and also alerts
in Saudi Arabia too. Now, there also was a report that airspace in Bahrain and
Kuwait um has been closed. So, we're going to be talking about that as well.
Um I'm just putting this tweet out. That's a flop.
Just one second and then we're going to be good to go.
Um, and as I said, do let everyone know about it. Like this video. We got Larry coming on in the next minute or two. Uh,
so Larry coming on is going to be brilliant, very important. This guy is very knowledgeable and to give the breaking news with him is going to be
amazing. We're going to continue on with the space in case anybody thinks that we're not, we are going to. So, there's any breaking news, we'll continue to
give you it on the space. If anybody wants the link to the YouTube, I'm going to put it in the nest at the moment. And
uh let's get into it. There's going to be a lot of news to speak about, a lot of news to get through. We're not going to end the space. We're going to
continue on with the YouTube. Let me just
Um, okay, cool. So, we're just waiting for Larry. But in the meantime, let me just give some more news. Um, let me try this. One second.
Um, okay. So, I need um
and yeah, guys, retweet the space. I'm just going to give some update on the news to the YouTube people just in case any news they missed out on and then
we'll take it from there. So here you should be able to see the news
and let me spotlight it for you. So we've seen explosions in Bahrain and we have this statement from the IIGGC which
says in response to the flagrant aggression committed by US terrorist forces against the national sovereignity
of the Islamic Republic of Iran on Keshum Island, the IRGC aerospace force struck US military occupation bases in
Kuwait with precise and intensive missile strikes, successfully destroying their targets and setting the aggressors fortification ablaze. The IGC issues
this as an initial response and delivers a severe warning to the US administration and any parties permitting their territory or airspace
to be used as a launchpad for aggression against Iran. Any acts of aggression or any move against a single inch of our
borders and sovereignity will be met with seismic crushing and decisive response that goes beyond existing boundaries. Our forces will not hesitate
to turn all enemy positions and interests in the region to ash. The era of hit and run is over.
So that was the statement by um Iran.
Obviously we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. Um,
and then yeah, we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it.
That's brilliant. That's in the right angles for when I want to give the news there. Okay, awesome. Lots of news, lots to speak about, lots to
get through. Uh, let me just give you some more news. Obviously, some of the news we've been tweeting out, but we that statement that statement talked
about explosions in specifically Kuwait, but we know there's been explosions confirmed in Bahrain. We know there's
reports of uh explosions in Dubai. We know that there's alerts in Saudi Arabia. So, this is a significant and
also Iraq. Iraq has been as a has been dealing with explosion after explosion
after explosion. So major explosions happening throughout.
And uh yeah, let me just have this ready for more news as well.
Okay. And yeah, what I'm seeing here is channel 14 news is saying if the Iranian regime fires even a single shot at
Israel tonight, all the gates of hell will be opened against it. Cabinet of Kuwait said, "We demand Iran to stop
attacking Kuwait and we condemn it. So obviously, we're going to continue giving you the news as and when we receive it." The news is coming out. Uh let me just make sure.
And uh yeah, we're just waiting for Larry. He could be a couple of minutes off. Obviously, there's a lot of news, so he's maybe held up in a previous broadcast. But in the meantime, retweet
and like this video, guys, and let's try and get as many people in the YouTube as possible. Lots to get through and lots
to break down. We will be having former CIA Larry Johnson. He's coming in in a second. He just messaged me. Brilliant.
Uh so, this is huge. This is major breaking news. Um, and uh, we're seeing a lot of evidence.
It says escalating attacks from Iran in response to ceasefire violations by the United States of America. The US
attacked Keshum Island with an at least three projectiles and at least one
impact. Iran hit Ali al-Salm air base in Kuwait. They hit Arif Jan
military US base in Kuwait. They hit US Navy fifth fleet fleet base in Bahrain.
Targets within the UAE, apparently an American base in U um in UAE,
possible sirens in Saudi Arabia. There was sirens in Saudi Arabia, but we don't know about if there was any strikes. and
uh also separatist HQ in urbal in Iraq were hit as well. Multiple strikes and
multiple hits. That's the uh latest news. Obviously, we're going to continue to give you the news and actually let me
catch up the YouTube for any of the news that they missed. Although I did a kind of overview give it, but we've seen a
multiple hits. Zencom are denying denying that any of these visuals were hit, but they've done that in the past.
They've done that in the past where they deny strikes and then we find out that strikes did indeed hit. We're going to
have Larry Johnson coming on. He's going to break all of this news down with us as it's coming through live. The only thing I ask of the YouTube audiences, if
you can like the video, tweet, brilliant. Everyone's hitting the emojis on there as well. Appreciate that. on the X if you can retweet the space uh as
well. We're going to be continuing to give you the news throughout the night.
We've got so many great guests coming on uh to break the news down. Uh Larry, thanks for joining us.
Can I ask can I ask for a two-minute delay because I've been I've been sitting here back to back to back to back to back since uh .
Of course, Larry, you take Never mind two minutes. Larry, take three minutes.
Okay. Okay. I was going to say take the number of minutes as missile struck, but there'll be too many missiles. There'll be too many minutes.
I'll be I'll be right back. I got to turn the lights on anyway. It's starting to get dark.
Appreciate it. So, Larry will be coming on in a couple of minutes. Don't worry about it. I was going to say to Larry,
take as many minutes as the number of missiles that Iran just struck today, but then I realized there's so many. I
don't want to be waiting so many minutes. So, I changed my mind and I didn't say that to him. But let me continue to give you the news as this is
happening. In the meantime, like I said, you guys, I'm not going to repeat it, but you guys know what you need to do.
Kuwait did receive a large number of hits too. Um, and this is ongoing. So,
obviously, as the news comes in, we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. Um,
okay. So the IRGC says the US struck an IR and this is uh was mentioned earlier in the space as well but the IRGC say
the US struck an Iranian oil tanker near the straight AUS damaging its engine room and IGC telecommunication
mast south of Keshum Island. In response the IGC says it targeted a vessel named Panaya with anti-ship missiles.
13 minutesApparently that vessel is an American Israeli vessel or an American vessel at least a US air and helicopter base in a
regional country. They targeted those US HQ of the US Navy fifth fleet with missiles and drones. And I mentioned all
of the US air bases where these strikes were carried out. So we have a huge amount of breaking news coming through.
Obviously, we'll continue to give you it as and when we receive it. Um,
okay. The IRGC, just some more information. I just mentioned this, but the IRGC confirm it struck a vessel called Panaya in the straight of
Hermoose in response to alleged US attacks. We also have the US officials
who made a statement. They said, "We remain committed to the ceasefire with Iran. The ceasefire remains in place.
The ceasefire still stands." What that tells you is the United States of America are not going to be responding to these attacks. Quite clearly, this is
a major escalation and major aggression by Iran in response to multiple strikes
on their locations. Guys, make sure you've subscribed to this channel as well and put your notifications on. As you know, for many years, we've been the
number one place on X for breaking news and now we're doing the exact same thing on YouTube. We have a huge number of people on X and we've got a huge number
of people on YouTube as well. Um, so let me just see what else we've got here.
Iran is hitting Kuwait very hard with major bombardment. The fact that the United States of America are saying that
they're not going to respond, that the ceasefire remains in place is uh interesting to say the least.
Okay. And I've got another Oh, you're okay. Brilliant. And we've got another statement. Thank Hi, Larry. How you doing?
I'm back. Thanks for coming. Thanks for coming. You There's been a huge amount of news. G Larry. Yeah.
Um, I know you're aware of it because you you've been on a number of podcasts.
What's your what's your thoughts about what's happening?
Well, this is uh let's go back to the the news that Pepe Escobar and I broke yesterday.
Uh we received intelligence uh last Thursday.
And so when we're getting it like Thursday, I'm getting at midday Thursday. It's already Thursday night.
uh and maybe it was early Friday morning in in Iran, but the Iranian Supreme National Security Council had met and
they met in response to the attacks that had been taking place on Keshum Island and Bonder Abbas and the attack on two Uh two Iranian uh naval uh speedboats.
And so they the the message uh they made a decision and then directed President Peskin
to contact foreign minister Shariff of Pakistan and Peskin delivered the following
message to Sharif. Now remember this was last Thursday um said one uh we're going to withdraw.
We're breaking off the negotiations. The United States is violating it.
They've attacked us. They blockaded us and they're and the the Israelis are attacking Lebanon and are and are
attacking Beirut. That is complete violation of the ceasefire we're pulling out.
Second, we're going to withdraw from the non-prololiferation treaty.
And third, we will then at some point after that, as a demonstration
to show that we do have a nuclear device, we will detonate a nuclear device in Iranian territory
in order to uh say, okay, this this is now uh we've Iran has upped the
pressure. And what happened? Then uh Shariff turned around and to his foreign minister and said, "Okay, get off get on
the phone or get with Marco Rubio as fast as possible. Let him know this." So the United States was informed of that.
Uh I, you know, I think it'd be natural to say, "Well, okay, that's what they're saying, but they don't really mean it." And then 10:00 Eastern time yesterday, 10:00 a.m.
Eastern, um the Iran announced, "We're done. The negotiations are over. Uh the
United States basically is not trustworthy." Now, it's within that it's conditional that if the United States turned around and began complying with
the agreement and doing what they had said they'd do, then then Iran, I think, would reconsider.
But until the United States does that, they're not going back. And and this and the point you're making that the United States is saying, "Oh, the ceasefire is
still in place." That shows that tells me that that part about the nuke, that's also true cuz they don't want to go
there. The United States does not want that to happen. the minute Iran detonates a nuclear device shows that it has one, then Donald Trump is going to
be proven the the ultimate buffoon uh that it was under his watch that this
whole uh thing fell apart. So, um that that that's where we're at and and I
think uh right now what uh Iran is doing what it said it would do. It's it's targeting the these attacks that have
taken place on Iranian territory came out of Kuwait. So, they're hitting Kuwait. They're not hitting Saudi Arabia. They're not hitting Qatar. Uh
the next one, they're reportedly also hitting Bahrain.
and um they they will uh probably hit the UAE if the UAE continues to provide
support to US military operations. So yeah, this is this is escalating. U how far it will go, we'll have to wait and see.
So Larry, just on that and by the way guys, we are going to give you the breaking news as and when we receive it as well. Uh because I know a lot of people here for the breaking news. Um,
who I guess the question is, um, who or how did Iran get the nuclear uh, bomb?
Was it something they produced themselves? Was it a third party country that gave it to them? What's the information on this?
Well, you remember Ringo Star song, I get by with a little help from my friends.
I think this was a Ringo Star moment.
uh and without identifying the country, let me just point out that Iran has very
good relations with Russia, with China, with North Korea and with Pakistan.
What those four countries all share in common is they all have functional nuclear weapons and uh and Iran is
aligned with them not to use nuclear weapons as in an offensive manner. And I and I think, you know, if if Iran ever
decided to use a nuke, they would use it against Israeli military bases.
You know, Israeli military facilities.
They're not going to use it against civilians. You know, that that's still they walk that fine line. but within
Shia theology and and I'm sure it's shared within Sunni theology too just not am just not among the Wahhabs and
the Debandis and the Salopus but for the majority the vast majority of Sunni Muslims the idea of killing a
non-combatant is a sin it's haram so um I I the Iranians they they don't
pay lip service to that they actually they believe that in fact you notice that uh how many civilians in Israel
were not killed and and in Saudi Arabia and in Qatar and in Bahrain and in Kuwait and in UAE during the first five
weeks of this war. Iran Iran actually went to great lengths to not inflict civilian casualties. They made sure they
were hitting strategic economic targets and military targets. Now, did they kill military personnel? Oh, absolutely.
That that's fair.
That's, you know, that that's not dishonorable. Killing civilians, dishonorable. And I'll just I'll add a
note to that that we had to listen to the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Security Council yesterday
complaining about Hezbollah attacks in Israel. And I just wish somebody at the council would have said, "Excuse me, how
many how many civilians has Hezbollah killed in Israel in the last four weeks?" And I think Danny would have had to say
none or a few. And then somebody say, "Well, Mr. Ambassador, how many
civilians has your government killed in Lebanon and in Gaza in the last four weeks?" And that answer is thousands.
Women, children, men who are not military, elderly men, thousands.
So you tell me who's the threat. No doubt. Um I totally agree with you.
Like I only believe in defensive war as well. I think that's very much clear in suddenly Ania theology. Now um Larry, you mentioned four countries that
possibly could have given Iran a nuclear bomb. Which country was it? Yeah, I'm not going to say. I know, but I'm not going to say.
It's good to ask. Good to ask, but I'm I'm going to leave that out.
When I was asking the question, when I was asked the question I thought should I have a smile or not and I thought let's have a serious face and then
um Iran has the engineering capability to build a device on its own. So it it
it's not really one that's has to go begging for this, but uh to be put into a position where they can now say with a
credible threat that don't you know don't tread on me. Uh that's why I again
I think um based upon how Trump and his team have been reacting since yesterday
they uh it's sort of anti-Trumpian if you will because normally Trump's out calling people names and insulting them
and calling them losers and threatening them. We're going to end your civilization.
You haven't heard any of that yet. I don't think you will. Uh but I I think one of the major reasons is uh Iran has
now said okay we're not playing around with this anymore and we're not going to be your punching bag. We we have laid
out very clearly that you know so the next step if these attacks don't stop. I think the next step will Iran will announce we are withdrawing from the non-prololiferation treaty.
We're not going to be the only ones following the rule of law while Israel and the United States ignore the rule of law.
Just another question on that, Larry. I also you mentioned something about that they're going to they plan a test as
well. Is there going to be a test for a nuclear for the nuclear bomb as well to just exhibit the spec the specific language and it's
I published it last night on sonar21.com.
Uh I said is is Iran going to get the nuke? And I said the answer is yes. And
within that, they made it very very clear that they're not using this as an offensive weapon to attack someone.
They're going to do it as a demonstration.
In other words, to to have a detonation, probably underground because I don't think they're going to do an above ground detonation that would risk contamination with radioactive material.
But they're going to do it in such a way that there will be no doubt, at least among Western analysts, that yeah, okay, they they've now joined the nuclear club.
Okay. And um in terms of this possible uh nuclear demonstration they're going
to do is this I'm presuming based on the information that you've given this was
after the assassination of say Ali alham okay and then the second question is was
this when what is the timeline of when this happened?
Well, the the the time you mean the timeline of this decision-m the timeline of the decision and the procurement of the nuclear bomb.
26 minutesYeah, I don't I don't have any information on that. Um, so but it's it's something that's been done and uh I
would I would suspect that they had that uh the Ayatollah had directed um people
prepare, you know, if I was him, I'd prepare at least three devices because you don't want to just prepare one that that's all
you got. It's to have a credible threat, you got to have more than one.
and uh but to have it, you know, in their back pocket, you know, would would Iran return to the table and say, "Okay,
let's negotiate that we don't have a nuclear uh weapon." Yes, I believe they would because they want to live in a
situation where they're not under nuclear threat from Israel and that they're not under threat of being attacked at whatever moment by the
United States or by Israel because the history despite all the Western propaganda
the history of Iran for the last 46 47 years 47 years is they've not been out attacking their neighbors. They haven't
rallied armies to attack Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Qatar. No, they
they've stayed at home. The only time that they went outside was into Syria when they were asked for help by Basher
al-Assad, who was under a concerted attack by the West, by US intelligence, by British intelligence, by Israeli
intelligence, who were aiding and abetting the radical Islamists, the the Salophus,
the Deabandis, uh the Wahhabis that uh you know, and and they're under their I'll call it the
unislamic version of Islam. They would kill other Muslims simply because they took it upon themselves to judge who was
a Muslim and who wasn't, which is again uh I think anathema to mainstream Muslim
thought. Totally agree. And we've got some more breaking news. This is a statement. We did get a few statements and they and I we'll just give the news as well as we're having this interview.
The breaking news, this was the statement by the IGC. The earlier statements allegedly weren't accurate.
This is an accurate accurate rendition of the statement. It says, quote, "Late last night, the invading US military target, sorry, the invading US military
targeted an Iranian oil tanker near the straight of Hermoose with a hellfire missile, damaging the engine room. In
response to this aggression and violation of the regulations of the Strait of Hermoose, the IRGC targeted an
enemy Zionist American ship, the Panaya, with missiles. In renewed aggression,
the American enemy also targeted an IIGC communication center on Keshum Island.
In response to this aggression, its air base and its helicopter base stationed in one of the countries in the region,
Kuwait, as well as the headquarters of the US fifth fleet in Bahrain, was subjected to an attack by missiles and
drones of the IRGC aerospace force. We warned previously that in the event of an aggression, the response would be
different and harsher and we have acted accordingly. These responses should serve as a lesson. We reaffirm that
undermining the security of the straus will cost the invading US military a heavy price. We also have another piece
of breaking news which says, quote, "A no-fly zone has been set up over Eril in northern Iraq, covering 13 covering 13
nautical mile radius and up 6,000 ft officially for a military exercise running from 7:00 a.m. to 10 uh p.m. So
major escalation and also obviously the airport in Bahrain has also been closed and Kuwait, Larry, major attacks by Iran, specifically Bahrain and Kuwait.
We heard alerts in we heard also possible reports that there was explosions in the UAE, although that one needs to be verified. The UAE does keep
things under wraps. And we did hear alerts in Saudi, although they were not verified either. What's your thoughts about these specific attacks?
Well, again, they are measured responses and the key is they are responses to US
attacks. These have not been initiated by Iran. And that's been, you know, that's that's been the track record
throughout this war, you know. So, you know, Iran is, I'll say, maintaining its integrity that they're not going to
they're not going to play into the hands of the West that wants to create a narrative that they're this crazed
Islamic fanatics who want to destroy Christians.
https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/2061959763907260428
https://x.com/i/status/2061959763907260428
Sulaiman Ahmed
@ShaykhSulaiman
Breaking: EXPLOSION IN BAHRAIN
0:02 / 0:21
5:54 PM · Jun 2, 2026
https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/2061501966526624142
Sulaiman Ahmed
@ShaykhSulaiman
BREAKING: IRGC URGENT WARNING:
“We announce to the settlers in northern occupied Palestine that the area specified in the attached map, which includes the Upper Galilee, the Lower Galilee, the Golan, and Haifa, has become a closed military zone as of this moment. If your criminal leaders target the southern suburb of Beirut or the city of Beirut, this area will be a target for attacks by the Iranian armed forces.
And we say to the honorable Palestinian people: The time has come to reclaim your land. Our fire is at your service. The departure of settlers from the occupied territories may be a prelude to your return to it.
Immediate evacuation order
To the residents of the settlements in northern occupied Palestine, it is announced that the area marked on the attached map, which includes the Upper Galilee, the Lower Galilee, the Golan Heights, and Haifa, is hereby defined as a closed military zone. Should your criminal leaders attack the southern Dahiya of Beirut or the city of Beirut, this area will become a target for the Iranian armed forces.
And to the esteemed Palestinian people we say: The time has come to reclaim your land. Our fire is at your service. The departure of the settlers from the occupied territories may be a preliminary step for your return to it.”
https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/2061501966526624142/photo/1
11:35 AM · Jun 1, 2026
https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/2061756042048950541
Sulaiman Ahmed
@ShaykhSulaiman
JUST IN: A source in the Israeli PM's team says reports about Trump personally warning Netanyahu about prison or saying he is hated worldwide are false.
The call was tense and focused on both leaders' complaints about each other's social media posts after their previous conversation.
Trump felt Netanyahu's post implied the war was continuing at full intensity, while Netanyahu felt Trump's post suggested Israel had agreed to a ceasefire on all fronts.
Trump did say it is becoming harder to defend Israel's position internationally.
- Israeli Channel 12
https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/2061958633118638175
Sulaiman Ahmed
@ShaykhSulaiman
BREAKING: IRGC STATEMENT ON ATTACKS
In response to the flagrant aggression committed by US terrorist forces against the national sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran on Qeshm Island, the IRGC Aerospace Force struck US military occupation bases in Kuwait with precise and intensive missile strikes, successfully destroying their targets and setting the aggressors' fortifications ablaze.
The IRGC issues this as an initial response and delivers a severe warning to the US administration and any party permitting their territory or airspace to be used as a launchpad for aggression against Iran:
Any new act of aggression, or any move against a single inch of our borders and sovereignty, will be met with a seismic, crushing, and decisive response that goes beyond existing boundaries. Our forces will not hesitate to turn all enemy positions and interests in the region to ash.
"The era of hit and run is over."
Last edited 5:50 PM · Jun 2, 2026
Transcript
Huge breaking news. We have information now, confirmation that Iran
has fired a number of missiles towards a large number of countries in the Middle
East. Kuwait has been hit. At least 10 missiles were fired towards uh Kuwait.
Two of the possible targets that we're hearing is the US base Ali Al um air base in Kuwait and the other one was the
uh is it Arian air base in Kuwait as well. The US fifth fleet in Bahrain was
also targeted and hit. We heard multiple explosions. We also heard reports that there were explosions in Dubai as well.
We're going to be giving you the breaking news throughout this conversation. We're going to be obviously having on uh ex CIA Larry
Johnson come on the show as well. So, do me a favor, like this video. Let's try
and get as many people in here as possible. Very important news and we're going to be giving it to you throughout
the night. We have uh we have uh XCIA Larry Johnson, then we have XCIA Ray McGovern, and then we have Lieutenant
Anthony Aguilera and possibly more guests. but also live on other uh platforms as well. And so people may interrupt to give us some breaking news
as well. For example, right now we've heard uh Iran has continuously and in a
sustained manner attacked um Iranian Kurdish opposition groups in Iraqi Kurdistan for the last .
We also see US bases are on fire. I see here now US base uh in Kuwait is on fire. A US base in Kuwait is on fire.
Guy, if you guys, if you're on the YouTube, I do need you to do me a favor.
And that favor is to um like this video and get as many people in here as
possible. And as I'm looking down, whenever I look down, it is cuz I'm looking for some uh breaking news. And
this is breaking explosion
in uh just only interrupt guys, if you could do me a favor when there's some breaking news. Thank you. um to the people on the panel if you can cuz
normally I mute when I'm on YouTube but if you can just mute uh sorry if you can just open your mic when there's some
breaking news that would be marvelous uh just to keep the stream clear and going.
So breaking news um explosions in Bahrain there is confirmation Sencom
claiming that there was no strikes but there was indeed some strikes. We have got a statement from the IIGC and the statement from the IIGC is as follows.
And uh let me get that for you. And actually let me see if this works. And guys like I said like the video, share
the video and uh let everybody know that we're on this channel. Many people may not know that we're on this channel. We
have XCIA Larry Johnson coming on. And as we normally do, it's something we've always been known for is to provide the breaking news as and when we receive it.
So explo So yeah,
so there was explosions in Bahrain, Kuwait. We've heard some that there's explosions in Dubai and also alerts
in Saudi Arabia too. Now, there also was a report that airspace in Bahrain and
Kuwait um has been closed. So, we're going to be talking about that as well.
Um I'm just putting this tweet out. That's a flop.
Just one second and then we're going to be good to go.
Um, and as I said, do let everyone know about it. Like this video. We got Larry coming on in the next minute or two. Uh,
so Larry coming on is going to be brilliant, very important. This guy is very knowledgeable and to give the breaking news with him is going to be
amazing. We're going to continue on with the space in case anybody thinks that we're not, we are going to. So, there's any breaking news, we'll continue to
give you it on the space. If anybody wants the link to the YouTube, I'm going to put it in the nest at the moment. And
uh let's get into it. There's going to be a lot of news to speak about, a lot of news to get through. We're not going to end the space. We're going to
continue on with the YouTube. Let me just
Um, okay, cool. So, we're just waiting for Larry. But in the meantime, let me just give some more news. Um, let me try this. One second.
Um, okay. So, I need um
and yeah, guys, retweet the space. I'm just going to give some update on the news to the YouTube people just in case any news they missed out on and then
we'll take it from there. So here you should be able to see the news
and let me spotlight it for you. So we've seen explosions in Bahrain and we have this statement from the IIGGC which
says in response to the flagrant aggression committed by US terrorist forces against the national sovereignity
of the Islamic Republic of Iran on Keshum Island, the IRGC aerospace force struck US military occupation bases in
Kuwait with precise and intensive missile strikes, successfully destroying their targets and setting the aggressors fortification ablaze. The IGC issues
this as an initial response and delivers a severe warning to the US administration and any parties permitting their territory or airspace
to be used as a launchpad for aggression against Iran. Any acts of aggression or any move against a single inch of our
borders and sovereignity will be met with seismic crushing and decisive response that goes beyond existing boundaries. Our forces will not hesitate
to turn all enemy positions and interests in the region to ash. The era of hit and run is over.
So that was the statement by um Iran.
Obviously we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. Um,
and then yeah, we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it.
That's brilliant. That's in the right angles for when I want to give the news there. Okay, awesome. Lots of news, lots to speak about, lots to
get through. Uh, let me just give you some more news. Obviously, some of the news we've been tweeting out, but we that statement that statement talked
about explosions in specifically Kuwait, but we know there's been explosions confirmed in Bahrain. We know there's
reports of uh explosions in Dubai. We know that there's alerts in Saudi Arabia. So, this is a significant and
also Iraq. Iraq has been as a has been dealing with explosion after explosion
after explosion. So major explosions happening throughout.
And uh yeah, let me just have this ready for more news as well.
Okay. And yeah, what I'm seeing here is channel 14 news is saying if the Iranian regime fires even a single shot at
Israel tonight, all the gates of hell will be opened against it. Cabinet of Kuwait said, "We demand Iran to stop
attacking Kuwait and we condemn it. So obviously, we're going to continue giving you the news as and when we receive it." The news is coming out. Uh let me just make sure.
And uh yeah, we're just waiting for Larry. He could be a couple of minutes off. Obviously, there's a lot of news, so he's maybe held up in a previous broadcast. But in the meantime, retweet
and like this video, guys, and let's try and get as many people in the YouTube as possible. Lots to get through and lots
to break down. We will be having former CIA Larry Johnson. He's coming in in a second. He just messaged me. Brilliant.
Uh so, this is huge. This is major breaking news. Um, and uh, we're seeing a lot of evidence.
It says escalating attacks from Iran in response to ceasefire violations by the United States of America. The US
attacked Keshum Island with an at least three projectiles and at least one
impact. Iran hit Ali al-Salm air base in Kuwait. They hit Arif Jan
military US base in Kuwait. They hit US Navy fifth fleet fleet base in Bahrain.
Targets within the UAE, apparently an American base in U um in UAE,
possible sirens in Saudi Arabia. There was sirens in Saudi Arabia, but we don't know about if there was any strikes. and
uh also separatist HQ in urbal in Iraq were hit as well. Multiple strikes and
multiple hits. That's the uh latest news. Obviously, we're going to continue to give you the news and actually let me
catch up the YouTube for any of the news that they missed. Although I did a kind of overview give it, but we've seen a
multiple hits. Zencom are denying denying that any of these visuals were hit, but they've done that in the past.
They've done that in the past where they deny strikes and then we find out that strikes did indeed hit. We're going to
have Larry Johnson coming on. He's going to break all of this news down with us as it's coming through live. The only thing I ask of the YouTube audiences, if
you can like the video, tweet, brilliant. Everyone's hitting the emojis on there as well. Appreciate that. on the X if you can retweet the space uh as
well. We're going to be continuing to give you the news throughout the night.
We've got so many great guests coming on uh to break the news down. Uh Larry, thanks for joining us.
Can I ask can I ask for a two-minute delay because I've been I've been sitting here back to back to back to back to back since uh .
Of course, Larry, you take Never mind two minutes. Larry, take three minutes.
Okay. Okay. I was going to say take the number of minutes as missile struck, but there'll be too many missiles. There'll be too many minutes.
I'll be I'll be right back. I got to turn the lights on anyway. It's starting to get dark.
Appreciate it. So, Larry will be coming on in a couple of minutes. Don't worry about it. I was going to say to Larry,
take as many minutes as the number of missiles that Iran just struck today, but then I realized there's so many. I
don't want to be waiting so many minutes. So, I changed my mind and I didn't say that to him. But let me continue to give you the news as this is
happening. In the meantime, like I said, you guys, I'm not going to repeat it, but you guys know what you need to do.
Kuwait did receive a large number of hits too. Um, and this is ongoing. So,
obviously, as the news comes in, we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. Um,
okay. So the IRGC says the US struck an IR and this is uh was mentioned earlier in the space as well but the IRGC say
the US struck an Iranian oil tanker near the straight AUS damaging its engine room and IGC telecommunication
mast south of Keshum Island. In response the IGC says it targeted a vessel named Panaya with anti-ship missiles.
13 minutesApparently that vessel is an American Israeli vessel or an American vessel at least a US air and helicopter base in a
regional country. They targeted those US HQ of the US Navy fifth fleet with missiles and drones. And I mentioned all
of the US air bases where these strikes were carried out. So we have a huge amount of breaking news coming through.
Obviously, we'll continue to give you it as and when we receive it. Um,
okay. The IRGC, just some more information. I just mentioned this, but the IRGC confirm it struck a vessel called Panaya in the straight of
Hermoose in response to alleged US attacks. We also have the US officials
who made a statement. They said, "We remain committed to the ceasefire with Iran. The ceasefire remains in place.
The ceasefire still stands." What that tells you is the United States of America are not going to be responding to these attacks. Quite clearly, this is
a major escalation and major aggression by Iran in response to multiple strikes
on their locations. Guys, make sure you've subscribed to this channel as well and put your notifications on. As you know, for many years, we've been the
number one place on X for breaking news and now we're doing the exact same thing on YouTube. We have a huge number of people on X and we've got a huge number
of people on YouTube as well. Um, so let me just see what else we've got here.
Iran is hitting Kuwait very hard with major bombardment. The fact that the United States of America are saying that
they're not going to respond, that the ceasefire remains in place is uh interesting to say the least.
Okay. And I've got another Oh, you're okay. Brilliant. And we've got another statement. Thank Hi, Larry. How you doing?
I'm back. Thanks for coming. Thanks for coming. You There's been a huge amount of news. G Larry. Yeah.
Um, I know you're aware of it because you you've been on a number of podcasts.
What's your what's your thoughts about what's happening?
Well, this is uh let's go back to the the news that Pepe Escobar and I broke yesterday.
Uh we received intelligence uh last Thursday.
And so when we're getting it like Thursday, I'm getting at midday Thursday. It's already Thursday night.
uh and maybe it was early Friday morning in in Iran, but the Iranian Supreme National Security Council had met and
they met in response to the attacks that had been taking place on Keshum Island and Bonder Abbas and the attack on two Uh two Iranian uh naval uh speedboats.
And so they the the message uh they made a decision and then directed President Peskin
to contact foreign minister Shariff of Pakistan and Peskin delivered the following
message to Sharif. Now remember this was last Thursday um said one uh we're going to withdraw.
We're breaking off the negotiations. The United States is violating it.
They've attacked us. They blockaded us and they're and the the Israelis are attacking Lebanon and are and are
attacking Beirut. That is complete violation of the ceasefire we're pulling out.
Second, we're going to withdraw from the non-prololiferation treaty.
And third, we will then at some point after that, as a demonstration
to show that we do have a nuclear device, we will detonate a nuclear device in Iranian territory
in order to uh say, okay, this this is now uh we've Iran has upped the
pressure. And what happened? Then uh Shariff turned around and to his foreign minister and said, "Okay, get off get on
the phone or get with Marco Rubio as fast as possible. Let him know this." So the United States was informed of that.
Uh I, you know, I think it'd be natural to say, "Well, okay, that's what they're saying, but they don't really mean it." And then 10:00 Eastern time yesterday, 10:00 a.m.
Eastern, um the Iran announced, "We're done. The negotiations are over. Uh the
United States basically is not trustworthy." Now, it's within that it's conditional that if the United States turned around and began complying with
the agreement and doing what they had said they'd do, then then Iran, I think, would reconsider.
But until the United States does that, they're not going back. And and this and the point you're making that the United States is saying, "Oh, the ceasefire is
still in place." That shows that tells me that that part about the nuke, that's also true cuz they don't want to go
there. The United States does not want that to happen. the minute Iran detonates a nuclear device shows that it has one, then Donald Trump is going to
be proven the the ultimate buffoon uh that it was under his watch that this
whole uh thing fell apart. So, um that that that's where we're at and and I
think uh right now what uh Iran is doing what it said it would do. It's it's targeting the these attacks that have
taken place on Iranian territory came out of Kuwait. So, they're hitting Kuwait. They're not hitting Saudi Arabia. They're not hitting Qatar. Uh
the next one, they're reportedly also hitting Bahrain.
and um they they will uh probably hit the UAE if the UAE continues to provide
support to US military operations. So yeah, this is this is escalating. U how far it will go, we'll have to wait and see.
So Larry, just on that and by the way guys, we are going to give you the breaking news as and when we receive it as well. Uh because I know a lot of people here for the breaking news. Um,
who I guess the question is, um, who or how did Iran get the nuclear uh, bomb?
Was it something they produced themselves? Was it a third party country that gave it to them? What's the information on this?
Well, you remember Ringo Star song, I get by with a little help from my friends.
I think this was a Ringo Star moment.
uh and without identifying the country, let me just point out that Iran has very
good relations with Russia, with China, with North Korea and with Pakistan.
What those four countries all share in common is they all have functional nuclear weapons and uh and Iran is
aligned with them not to use nuclear weapons as in an offensive manner. And I and I think, you know, if if Iran ever
decided to use a nuke, they would use it against Israeli military bases.
You know, Israeli military facilities.
They're not going to use it against civilians. You know, that that's still they walk that fine line. but within
Shia theology and and I'm sure it's shared within Sunni theology too just not am just not among the Wahhabs and
the Debandis and the Salopus but for the majority the vast majority of Sunni Muslims the idea of killing a
non-combatant is a sin it's haram so um I I the Iranians they they don't
pay lip service to that they actually they believe that in fact you notice that uh how many civilians in Israel
were not killed and and in Saudi Arabia and in Qatar and in Bahrain and in Kuwait and in UAE during the first five
weeks of this war. Iran Iran actually went to great lengths to not inflict civilian casualties. They made sure they
were hitting strategic economic targets and military targets. Now, did they kill military personnel? Oh, absolutely.
That that's fair.
That's, you know, that that's not dishonorable. Killing civilians, dishonorable. And I'll just I'll add a
note to that that we had to listen to the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations Security Council yesterday
complaining about Hezbollah attacks in Israel. And I just wish somebody at the council would have said, "Excuse me, how
many how many civilians has Hezbollah killed in Israel in the last four weeks?" And I think Danny would have had to say
none or a few. And then somebody say, "Well, Mr. Ambassador, how many
civilians has your government killed in Lebanon and in Gaza in the last four weeks?" And that answer is thousands.
Women, children, men who are not military, elderly men, thousands.
So you tell me who's the threat. No doubt. Um I totally agree with you.
Like I only believe in defensive war as well. I think that's very much clear in suddenly Ania theology. Now um Larry, you mentioned four countries that
possibly could have given Iran a nuclear bomb. Which country was it? Yeah, I'm not going to say. I know, but I'm not going to say.
It's good to ask. Good to ask, but I'm I'm going to leave that out.
When I was asking the question, when I was asked the question I thought should I have a smile or not and I thought let's have a serious face and then
um Iran has the engineering capability to build a device on its own. So it it
it's not really one that's has to go begging for this, but uh to be put into a position where they can now say with a
credible threat that don't you know don't tread on me. Uh that's why I again
I think um based upon how Trump and his team have been reacting since yesterday
they uh it's sort of anti-Trumpian if you will because normally Trump's out calling people names and insulting them
and calling them losers and threatening them. We're going to end your civilization.
You haven't heard any of that yet. I don't think you will. Uh but I I think one of the major reasons is uh Iran has
now said okay we're not playing around with this anymore and we're not going to be your punching bag. We we have laid
out very clearly that you know so the next step if these attacks don't stop. I think the next step will Iran will announce we are withdrawing from the non-prololiferation treaty.
We're not going to be the only ones following the rule of law while Israel and the United States ignore the rule of law.
Just another question on that, Larry. I also you mentioned something about that they're going to they plan a test as
well. Is there going to be a test for a nuclear for the nuclear bomb as well to just exhibit the spec the specific language and it's
I published it last night on sonar21.com.
Uh I said is is Iran going to get the nuke? And I said the answer is yes. And
within that, they made it very very clear that they're not using this as an offensive weapon to attack someone.
They're going to do it as a demonstration.
In other words, to to have a detonation, probably underground because I don't think they're going to do an above ground detonation that would risk contamination with radioactive material.
But they're going to do it in such a way that there will be no doubt, at least among Western analysts, that yeah, okay, they they've now joined the nuclear club.
Okay. And um in terms of this possible uh nuclear demonstration they're going
to do is this I'm presuming based on the information that you've given this was
after the assassination of say Ali alham okay and then the second question is was
this when what is the timeline of when this happened?
Well, the the the time you mean the timeline of this decision-m the timeline of the decision and the procurement of the nuclear bomb.
26 minutesYeah, I don't I don't have any information on that. Um, so but it's it's something that's been done and uh I
would I would suspect that they had that uh the Ayatollah had directed um people
prepare, you know, if I was him, I'd prepare at least three devices because you don't want to just prepare one that that's all
you got. It's to have a credible threat, you got to have more than one.
and uh but to have it, you know, in their back pocket, you know, would would Iran return to the table and say, "Okay,
let's negotiate that we don't have a nuclear uh weapon." Yes, I believe they would because they want to live in a
situation where they're not under nuclear threat from Israel and that they're not under threat of being attacked at whatever moment by the
United States or by Israel because the history despite all the Western propaganda
the history of Iran for the last 46 47 years 47 years is they've not been out attacking their neighbors. They haven't
rallied armies to attack Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Qatar. No, they
they've stayed at home. The only time that they went outside was into Syria when they were asked for help by Basher
al-Assad, who was under a concerted attack by the West, by US intelligence, by British intelligence, by Israeli
intelligence, who were aiding and abetting the radical Islamists, the the Salophus,
the Deabandis, uh the Wahhabis that uh you know, and and they're under their I'll call it the
unislamic version of Islam. They would kill other Muslims simply because they took it upon themselves to judge who was
a Muslim and who wasn't, which is again uh I think anathema to mainstream Muslim
thought. Totally agree. And we've got some more breaking news. This is a statement. We did get a few statements and they and I we'll just give the news as well as we're having this interview.
The breaking news, this was the statement by the IGC. The earlier statements allegedly weren't accurate.
This is an accurate accurate rendition of the statement. It says, quote, "Late last night, the invading US military target, sorry, the invading US military
targeted an Iranian oil tanker near the straight of Hermoose with a hellfire missile, damaging the engine room. In
response to this aggression and violation of the regulations of the Strait of Hermoose, the IRGC targeted an
enemy Zionist American ship, the Panaya, with missiles. In renewed aggression,
the American enemy also targeted an IIGC communication center on Keshum Island.
In response to this aggression, its air base and its helicopter base stationed in one of the countries in the region,
Kuwait, as well as the headquarters of the US fifth fleet in Bahrain, was subjected to an attack by missiles and
drones of the IRGC aerospace force. We warned previously that in the event of an aggression, the response would be
different and harsher and we have acted accordingly. These responses should serve as a lesson. We reaffirm that
undermining the security of the straus will cost the invading US military a heavy price. We also have another piece
of breaking news which says, quote, "A no-fly zone has been set up over Eril in northern Iraq, covering 13 covering 13
nautical mile radius and up 6,000 ft officially for a military exercise running from 7:00 a.m. to 10 uh p.m. So
major escalation and also obviously the airport in Bahrain has also been closed and Kuwait, Larry, major attacks by Iran, specifically Bahrain and Kuwait.
We heard alerts in we heard also possible reports that there was explosions in the UAE, although that one needs to be verified. The UAE does keep
things under wraps. And we did hear alerts in Saudi, although they were not verified either. What's your thoughts about these specific attacks?
Well, again, they are measured responses and the key is they are responses to US
attacks. These have not been initiated by Iran. And that's been, you know, that's that's been the track record
throughout this war, you know. So, you know, Iran is, I'll say, maintaining its integrity that they're not going to
they're not going to play into the hands of the West that wants to create a narrative that they're this crazed
Islamic fanatics who want to destroy Christians.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 41051
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am
Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN
by admin » Wed Jun 03, 2026 6:42 pm
Part 2 of 2
No, they Iran is defending itself and it's specifically targeting Kuwait because u you know the the Hellfire
missile I suspect that was fired by a drone not by a pilot and those drones apparently are coming out of Kuwait and
so that's why they're hitting both the air base and the uh army uh base in
Kuwait, US Army facility. So, uh, you know, the US is going to have to make a decision. Are they going to escalate?
And if they escalate, then that's the end of the ceasefire. Uh, and, you know, putting Donald Trump in a real real
pickle. You know, I I I heard I haven't verified it independently, but I was told um on an earlier broadcast uh with
Peter Kersonen that um the the Trump's popularity is now below 30%.
And I I find that quite believable.
We're also seeing that, you know, with the past manipulation of oil prices that the price prices now are climbing
because I think the oil market's waking up and realizing that this whole this whole thing about an imminent peace agreement was a complete fraud.
Yeah. And um guys, make sure you like this video and get as many people in here as possible. Very important
breaking news happening. Uh Larry, the Americans are b obviously the Americans
are denying that these missiles struck their targets. They're saying that Iran is lying. What's your thoughts on that? This is directly from Sencom.
Yeah, America's lying. If I'm telling the truth on this, Iran's not looking for a pretext. Uh you know, Iran is
content to let things run. It's it's United States attacking.
I mean, who who can give the United States any benefit of a doubt since they're the ones that in the midst of
peace negotiations or negotiations to secure and ensure that Iran did not have
a nuclear weapon, the United States betrayed those negotiations and used that as a pretext to launch that attack
on the 28th of February. Even though the mediator from you know the for I think he was the foreign minister of Oman
he was very very upbeat on the 26th of February said oh boy we got you know uh
things are looking really good I think we're making some real progress and that got blown to hell on the morning of the 28th of February.
Okay we've got some more breaking news.
Bahrain has closed its entire airspace until 400 p.m. All flights grounded amid fresh regional security alerts and Gulf
air defense activity. That's the latest news on that. We did hear earlier on today that Bahrain had cancelled their
flights to Iran and Iraq. Could that be in relation to this? Did they kind of smell something was coming?
Yeah, I'd say so. You know, I don't believe in coincidence.
So if it's if it's in fact um you know if if that is true then yeah that would that would show that they they knew this
was coming. They knew the United States was going to go after this Iranian tanker.
So the US uh Larry is saying that they don't want to escalate. They're trying to again play this down
the countries that were hit, the smaller Gulf countries like Kuwait, like Bahrain.
Um do you think this does escalate or do you think that Trump's as you mentioned because of the fear of the nuclear bomb, because of the fear of various other
things, Trump wants to play all of this down?
Yeah. Well, I think I think he's trying to play it down right now. um because of again because of that message that was
delivered to Marco Rubio pointing out that this this could advance to uh a demonstration that Iran has a nuke and I
think Trump and company want to avoid that embarrassment. I mean that would be a complete you know it would completely the the questions that would be coming
up at the press conference was wait you said you obliterated their capa capability.
Now, of course, they turn around and say, "See, we told you all along Iran was going to do this, but but um it is
the fact that Trump has avoided getting into the name calling and doing that kind of thing that he normally does uh
tells me that he he recognizes that this is this is quite serious and uh that, you know, they're trying to keep this from getting out of hand.
But in order to stop it from getting out of hand, the one thing you've got to do is to make sure that you don't cause the
initial confrontation that will cause this to get out of hand. And if you look at each one of these incidences,
every single one of these days have been initiated by the United States of America. So why produce?
Why attack and cause such a response when you know you don't have the ability, the capability to respond?
Yeah, I think a continued test that they they're not certain that Iran means what it says and that's why Iran's responding as it is. Yeah, we absolutely mean it.
Trust us and uh you know, we're not going to talk, we're going to do our talking with missiles now. We're not going to do our talking with words.
So, we have got some visuals. Actually, it's not. Yeah. Okay, it's posted. And guys, by the way, guys, when I'm looking down, it's cuz we're looking for news.
We're looking for new information and clips, but this visual should hopefully
show. And let me here here it is. Uh let me show a better
angle. Here we go. Um let me remove this off.
Okay. So you can see here hopefully you can see this American air defense failing in Kuwait after failing to destroy Iranian missile. So you can see
the Iranian missile does end up striking. So this kind of um debunks the claim, Larry, about them um stopping the missile.
Are you suggesting that the United States is lying? Oh my goodness.
Um yeah, I mean Yeah. Yeah, you are. And they are okay. Yeah.
Yeah. This is that we intercepted everything. Yeah.
Sure. Sure. Tell that to the people on the ground.
Now, I I I don't I don't rule out the the possibility that Iran in its missile
response is using what I'll call lower grade, lower capable missiles that they are using. That these are more just as a
reminder that okay, we're not hitting you with our full weight. We're just we're hitting you enough that you know we're serious about this, but if you
keep [ __ ] around, you're going to find out.
Yeah. And that's exactly what's happening. Larry, um just on this actually, let me get up the targets that
were struck in um these different locations. So, it was Ali alsu.
It was Arif John military US base in Kuwait. There was the US Navy fifth
fleet in Bahrain. There were also allegedly targets in the UAE. We did hear there were sirens in the UAE. We
also heard the possibility that there were sirens in Saudi Arabia. And then we also heard that the Separatists HQ,
which some call Mossad HQ in Bil also received consistent attacks as well.
What's your thoughts about those locations and why those specific locations are I I I don't see Iran attack doing
anything against the Saudis unless the Saudis allow their airspace to be used for attacks and I don't think the Saudis are
in fact I don't Qatar as well you know they're not um they've got the major air base in the area aloud but apparently
that air base is not being used for any kind of offensive operations against Iran As far as Bahrain, there is no
fifth fleet there anymore. Where the fifth fleet used to be located, where the fifth fleet headquarters used to be,
but uh now those those buildings, my understanding, basically empty. So, you know, the United States is not in a position to really do much damage to those.
So, if the fleets are empty and nonoperational, why would Iran waste their time attacking it? Well, that
again it's the West claiming that it's attacking it, not Iran.
I didn't see the RGC say we're hitting targets in Bahrain. Um the well this one claims this unless this is a fake one
but I'm being told this is a legitimate uh IGC statement. The one I read you know the one I read it Larry it says uh
in response to this aggression its air base and its helicopter base stationed in one of the countries in the region Kuwait as well as the headquarters of
the US fifth fleet in Bahrain was subjected to an attack by missiles and drones of the IRGC aerospace forces.
Okay.
Yeah. Well, they're they're attacking an empty shell because the fifth fleet command is not back in Bahrain. It'd be
insane to be back there. They don't have any protection.
So, so you think that this attack then, this specific attack on that specific base was more of a kind of
not an act, a reminder, a reminder.
You know, they may have the reason they may have targeted that was because the other the the other the what is it the
Pan or Panaya that Iran hit as sort of a tit for tat. You hit our ship, we'll hit your ship.
Yeah. Now, um we also saw that the telecommunication another telecommunication radar was hitting Kashm Island. I brought this up
to you the other day, Larry. They are starting to consistently hit a number of telecommunication and radars on the straight of Hermoose. As someone who is intelligence, how important is that?
Like if they take enough out, what would that do?
Well, it depends. Um I I and and so I start with the assumption that Iran is
not dependent upon one type of communication system.
uh they have both visible systems that are above ground, but I I think they also have other systems uh some below
ground. Uh and you can't rule out that they've also created decoys.
42 minutesThey'll create a if you will a a target that looks like a communications node.
Turns out that it isn't. But if if the United States plan is to, you know, gradually try to wipe out the ability to
communicate between these units, then that could be a prelude to another attack. You know, maybe try to insert
ground forces. But but I don't think the US is there yet because I I'm just I'm not hearing the chatter that you normally would hear that if that kind of
major operation was planned uh then there would be activities undergirling it that would be underway right now and I'm not seeing or hearing that.
Well that's interesting because we've got some news that suggests the opposite but then I guess this could be just fake reporting. Uh but there is some news
claiming air defense activity is reported or in Isvahan. Lo locals within western Thran are reporting a possible
power cut and also locals in um in western Thran are also reporting aerial
jet activity. Now this may not be a US attack. It could be for example Iranian jets. It could be for example power that has been cut by Iran themselves because
of certain defense procedures they're putting in place. It could also be that the air defense activity is ready for anything possible even though it may not
be coming. But these are the latest and breaking news.
Well, and also consider that what might be taking place over Ishvahan is a US drone trying to do intelligence
collection and the Iranian air defense systems naturally would engage that target. They've shot they've shot down
over 25 MQ9 Reapers and several MQ1 Predators over
the course of the last, you know, 12, 13 weeks. So that that that could be another explanation. I I do think it's
more likely that the the air traffic that they're hearing over Iran is Iranian air traffic, not US air traffic.
Fair enough. Fair enough. That makes sense. That does actually make sense cuz you I remember you mentioning to me that if something like that was to be happening, you would be hearing chatter
at least about 5 to before something happened.
Yeah. There's a whole a whole host of let's call them bureaucratic things, message messages that have to be sent,
messages received. um you know uh and when you get get up to what's called an execute order um you know they they
issue first the flow is there's what issued a a concept of operations and then the uh or there's an alert warning
order and then the the units that are actually going to carry out the military activity they have to go back with a proposed con concept of operations and
then that concept of operations is accepted or modified communicated back down the line and then that becomes the plan and then they have
to wait for the execution order. So, uh I I don't think we're at that stage yet.
But again, I'm not I'm not sitting in any of the uh command centers monitoring that message traffic.
Yeah. Yeah. Um and guys, make sure you like the YouTube and retweet the X.
We've got so many people on both and people need to are here for the breaking news. Let's get as many people in here as possible. Um, so
just bringing this back over. So previously when there was an attack on UAE and there was an attack on Saudi, there was this kind of annoyance with
the United States of America when they didn't respond.
This time the attacks, let's say they were only on Kuwait and Bahrain.
Would there be the same level of angst amongst the Gulf States or do you think they're going to just let this slide?
No, I think well it's sending a message.
Now my understanding is that both Qatar and the Saudis were basically saying okay with us we're going to we're going
to push your bases out. I think Qatar has given the United States 9 months to relocate aloud which that that's going to be
significant if if true but again that comes that comes from the same source that said uh Iran's going to pull out of
the negotiations. Iran's going to withdraw from the non-prololiferation treaty and Iran's going to do a nuke
demonstration and then pointed out as well that this is there has been a decided shift in the attitudes of key
Gulf states like I call Saudis and Qataris those are the t two key Gulf
states because of the volume of sulfur ura helium oil liquid natural gas that
is produced between those two. They're far more important than Kuwait, Bahrain or the UAE.
What's um you know when you me when do you in terms of a timeline when do you think they basically leave the MPT or when do you think they actually do their
test? You explain how they're going to do the test, but what was the date you said again?
Well, I I think I think it depends a large measure on the US what it does. So
far, at least Trump has tried to reign in BB Netanyahu as not not it hasn't
been necessarily fully effective. Um, and the United States, as you've acknowledged earlier, they're not retaliating and they're making emphasis.
No, no, the the ceasefire still holds.
We still we're still abiding by the ceasefire.
So, uh, and and it makes no sense because they're not abiding by the ceasefire. if
they're attacking an Iranian flag vessel.
So there's no plans of actually leaving the MPT, doing the test. They're looking at what the situation's going to how the situation is going to unfold.
Well, my reading of it is it's let's call it it's an escalatory ladder.
They've taken the first step. We're cutting off the talks.
Second step would be we're withdrawing from the NPT. I I didn't receive no information giving the guidance upon
when that would happen or under what conditions. Similarly with the de nuclear explosion demonstration
we got no further details upon under what what would be the triggering uh activity or activities that would
lead Iran to say okay we've got to we have to do this now. But it's the point is it's moving in a direction away from
an agreement instead of towards an agreement.
Yeah. And we actually got a chat here which uh is actually true cuz I had to double check here which is that Russian news are saying and it's not just Russian news. It's been throughout
saying the billiondoll Patriot system spectacularly fails right after launch in Kuwait because we've got visuals of
the interceptors failing in order to try and stop these uh missiles. Well, I mean, I I I'm surprised they even have
some interceptors left because the number of the packs pack three missiles is way down. And and understand they got
to fire two of those against if there's if Iran has fired one missile, that means they got to fire two packs. If
Iran has fired four missiles, they've got to fire eight packs. So, just, you know, do the math at a minimum.
in terms of um you you mentioned this right and there was a report saying that in this previous confrontation the 39
day war Iran made sorry Israel made the United States of America use their supply more so and so the US is
significantly more depleted than even Israel what's your understanding and if that's the case as per what you said
like there's not going to be much to go around for the Gulf states what's your understanding of how something like that would even happen.
Well, let's be clear as well. Israel's in no great shape either. It's not like they've got a they're husbanding a bunch
of very effective missiles. The Israeli Iron Dome is less effective than uh the
Patriot missile. The Israeli iron Iron Dome is good against subsonic rockets that the Hezbollah used to launch from
the north. uh but ballistic missiles or the drones uh not effective or minimally effective.
So um this is whatever they're using though if they are actually firing some Patriot missile batteries every missile
they fire is one more missile that the United States cannot replace anytime soon. So it ends up depleting the US stock.
Yeah. And so one of the things you mentioned, Larry, was when you look at the US stock and how they've shared it between Ukraine, how they've shared it
between um the gold state and Israel, they're severely depleted. Um I mean, even these
strikes will be depleting the stock even more so, right? Mhm.
And yeah, I mean it's like I said, if they're firing, they'll fire a minimum of two. Sometimes they'll fire three or
four at the same time at the same target.
But uh you know what what what's clear is that um the United States does not have unlimited supplies and they've been
having to cannibalize supplies from other countries uh other theaters such as the Pacific theater.
So this you know uh we're back in this uh I'll call it the waiting game. We're going to wait and see what the United States does to uh respond.
Um yeah, and guys, we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. The news is a bit more lighter at the moment. Obviously, we do keep checking for updates at the same time.
Uh Larry, um you know, you mentioned I know I'm a bit excited about the nuclear bomb and actually that's what the conversation about today was going to be. I even had the post ready. Iran has a nuclear bomb.
Uh but then this breaking news took over so I changed the poster. But the point was is um in terms of one of these
countries possibly giving Iran the nuclear bomb, would that not cause major issues in terms of the way they have to
deal with America? And so what I mean by that is for example, let's say it was Pakistan. Well, Pakistan is vehemently connected to the America in a number of
ways. I know you we've discussed this many times and how you believe they're moving away and various other things, but someone like them would never want
to draw the ear of the United States of America. Same with China in the sense of China obviously isn't afraid of the US,
but at the same time they don't want this kind of combative nature. And so other than possibly North Korea, how in
what scenario would any of these countries even have the Kutzbah to even give the nuclear bomb to Iran?
Well, I don't think they necessarily gave the nuclear bomb to Iran. Um I I
think what I'm hearing is more assistance and developing uh a functional warhead that could fit on any
of the Iranian missiles. So to that extent they are um
it's it's it's an Iranian creation but it's been it's had had support uh from one of the other countries. Um, but it's
all being done in the context of not to initiate or escalate the war into a nuclear war. Rather to force the United
States and Israel to re-evaluate their strategy to say, "Okay, we got to stop attacking
uh we've got to stop attacking Iran just like the same reason we don't attack North Korea because they do have a nuke
and they could use it and we don't want we don't want to go down that road.
Okay. So, this is an Iranian creation with some support by some other country
that has the expertise in this area is what you're saying, right? That that that's what I've been told.
Okay. And now again, can I I can't independently verify that, but the the source came
from uh a person that's in a position to know that this is true.
That's huge. And um the other uh question I have for you is you mentioned how the the nuke would be used in a
defensive posture. How they're going to be used in you know the different moralistic logistical reasons they'll be
used. That being said obviously there is this fatwa by the previous leader of Iran say Ali alham which prohibited it.
So therefore, I'm presuming that his son say alham will have to or probably did
maybe didn't do it publicly issue a new fatwa a new ruling to supersede the ruling of his father.
Very possible. I mean, I I argued early on that I could see him doing that having, you know, having watched his
wife and daughter being killed by the Americans and his mother and father that, you know, just human human nature
alone dictates that you can't set back and let that happen and do nothing in response.
But uh I also believe that he is he is a man of deep faith and conviction and
he's not going to uh carelessly throw away you know Islamic teaching and
doctrine. Uh he will he will remain faithful to that. Uh and so um again I
think what Iran's looking at is a measure of last resort.
Um, in other words, you know, they this isn't their first option. This is their uh last option.
Yeah. Yeah. It's a deterrence, right?
I'm I'm actually someone who only believes in defensive war. I think if you have a nuclear bomb, it probably stops more war than actually causes and you just know that you're never going to
use it. Uh, and hopefully no one will use it against you and you never have to use it.
Right. No. Exactly. Right. Um because the whole issue with Israel is that it is the nuclear bomb that gives them the
gall to act in the manner that they do because like we know you know Larry they don't have the military capability to
succeed in many of these fronts that they're trying to succeed in whether it's Lebanon whether it's in Gaza whether it's in Iran. Now they know that
defeat will come but what they also obviously always fear is the idea that they would be demolished in and I mean
that in terms of their military being demolished and if they were to get into an expansive war with someone like Iran their country would be demolished and decimated.
Yes.
And then in their mind sorry no go ahead go ahead. Sorry.
And in their mind they think that if that was to happen we'll just nuke them.
We've got all these nukes. We'll just nuke them. So this equalizes that, right? And maybe it may that Yeah, that forces them to say,
"Okay, if we nuke them, they could nuke us." And Israel, I use the imagery of a giant
sumo wrestler fighting a [ __ ] fighting a little person who's say 3'6 in tall and weighs
uh, you know, 30 kilos. Um the the
little person can can only absorb a few blows from a massive sumo wrestler
whereas the suma wrestler could you know it could it could take hits all day from the uh little person and not flinch.
So Iran has prepared the contingency for being attacked with nuclear weapons. At
least it's secured ballistic missiles. production facilities etc. underground in hardened
hardened shelters that uh and as we've seen uh in the last uh 7 weeks, 8 weeks,
they've been digging out the ones that were damaged or where they the US attempted to close the entrances and they failed. They were dug out.
And you mentioned about you gave the example of sumo wrestler and a [ __ ] and just for the audience because we know that obviously Israel has a large
number of nuclear bombs. But on the other hand, Iran is a very huge place with a 90 million population. Iran is as big as Alaska. It's a huge huge country.
And so it's the seven it's the 17th largest country in the world. 17th largest country in the world.
But then Iran, Israel has a large number of nuclear bombs. The number obviously no one knows, but the claim is that it could be even in the hundreds.
On the other hand, Iran may have, as you mentioned, three, but Israel is a tiny place and more than that, Larry. It's a
tiny place, but actually most of Israel is actually deserted. There's actually three or four key areas where there is
Israelis, right? So almost it equalizes it. What's your thoughts on that, Lori?
Yeah. Well, again, that size differential allows, you got to ask um
if you dropped one nuke on Israel and one nuke on Iran um
and let's say they were dropped on military targets.
Iran has far more military targets that would actually exhaust an Israeli supply, whereas Israel's got a very,
very finite number of military targets that are relatively easy to hit. Again, that's saying if this thing goes hot, goes beyond what it is right now.
I mean, the thing is you you mentioned military targets, um, Larry, but the Israelis won't target military targets. That's going to be the problem.
Oh, yeah. Well, they they'll target civilians, but then they're going to be in worse worse shape now or worse shape then than they are right now. And
they're already suffering massive massive public relations damage.
Well, I don't think they care about public relation damage, though, Larry.
If they cared about it, they wouldn't have acted in the manner they've acted over this entire three years.
Well, they calculated they could get away with it, but now what they're discovering is they can't. And that is,
you know, that's sort of what has created the challenge for them. They they've they've jumped into the abyss and they don't have any good way back.
Yes. Yeah. They don't. And this has been the major problem, right? That they're obvious obviously disliked.
They're obviously not respected. Um but despite that being the case, um I don't think they care about that. I think they
think that look, everyone hates us anyway. Let's do what we got to do.
Let's get what we want and then later people will forget about it. People forgot about when America used the nuclear bomb. People will forget that we did it. This is their psychology and I
don't think that impacts them. I think that won't stop them doing what they plan to do.
2 minutesWell, no, you you may be correct. I can't argue with that. I think that's a reasonable argument.
Um Larry, the other question I've got for you is um looking at what's happened now, do you think this now doubles down or do you think that there is going to
be more escalation tomorrow? Do you think the GCC countries are going to start forcing Trump to do something or do you think because of this whole nuclear bomb situation that you referred
to, this is now Trump's just going to do everything in his power not to go to war?
Um I think it will continue to escalate.
Now, at the same time though, as we've seen so far, Trump is avoiding escalating it. And and I think they re
recognizes that if he does escalate, if he does start retaliating to this, it it's it's going to threaten the entire
US presence in the Persian Gulf and it's going to further discredit the United States in the eyes of the Saudi Arabia
and Qatar and Oman and probably Kuwait too because Kuwait said, "Why are you making
us the target?" you know, why why are you bringing all this, you know, this madness to us? Uh so
that, you know, we're trying to get away from this. We're not trying to get embroiled in more.
But isn't that because Kuwait's using America's using Kuwait to launch these attacks on Iran even now? If Kuwait wanted out of it, they could.
Yeah. Yeah. Well, that that's and that's the issue right there that if uh the United States wants to uh put an end to
this, then they've got to stop launching attacks from these Gulf countries or those Gulf countries need to stand up themselves and say stop. You're not
going to do any more of these attacks from here.
Exactly. But then they're not doing that. I I know your your position is Saudi Arabia aren't and possibly Qatar aren't. uh but we know that for example
Kuwait our Bahrain our UAE is um and so those are key allies that are doing
something. Now in terms of UAE Larry why has the Iran not struck the UAE in these strikes if if they well again if if if there were no
launches of drones or aircraft from uh UAE that attacked Iran Iran's not going to attack them. M
yeah you know sending a very clear message you don't hit me I don't hit you what do you want to do
there was um a report this was relayed by uh a few people such as treaty and the claim was this Larry it was that as
part of this kind of deal that they were going to put together between the US and Iran that there was this understanding that if Israel breaks the deal as in if
Israel bombs another country Israel sorry bombs Lebanon then Iran as a response would be able to bomb the UAE and that would be the kind of equalizer.
You bomb Lebanon, an ally of Iran, Iran bombs your ally, which is the UAE, and that would stop both sides from
basically breaking the deal. What's what's your understanding or thoughts of that?
Well, I'm sure that's one of the one of the policy positions calculated by Iran.
But again, this is this thing is dynamic. We we we have a sort of an everchanging picture and right now the picture says warning.
It's flashing a warning lights because um this this thing could escalate out of hand.
Yeah. Um no doubt. And obviously we continue to give you the breaking news.
We got Larry on. We got Larry. We've got your friend on next as well. We got um Ray McGovern on next.
Oh, okay. Yeah. We'll give you a good rundown.
Yeah. And then we got uh Anthony Aguilera as well. So, we're not going anywhere. But Larry, always appreciate you coming on. I know that they've been working you. We've all been working you
really hard, Larry. You've been doing about seven or eight podcasts a day. I was looking through your Substack on Sonar 21 yesterday. So, on uh Sona 21, which is on Substack and your website.
And it was like seven or six or seven podcasts. I was like, you're grinding, Larry.
Yeah, it's a it's it's a grind, but it's worth it trying to get good information out to people. Ask people to think about
things. Don't get uh overwhelmed or flooded with the propaganda. Learn how to discern what's true, what isn't. And
I and certainly, man, I congratulate you on the good work you're doing. Talk about grinding, man. Appreciate you, Larry.
You're Yeah, but you're young. You could you can you could do this.
True. True. Although I don't feel it sometimes, Larry. But yeah, I I Larry, we always appreciate you. Really value you. The fact that you're getting the
truth out there, the information out there. We need more people like you. So, thank you so much for joining us and everyone should be following your Substack. I know I read it every night.
Even if I'm tired, then I'll skim a read it. I'll skim read it and just look at like some of it, but yeah, definitely. Well, I I appreciate that, my friend.
7 minutesYou stay well and I'm sure we'll be talking again this week.
Definitely. Definitely. It's going to go down. Thank you so much, Larry, for joining us. That was Larry Johnson.
Make sure you're following him and subscribing. We're continuing on guys, so don't leave, but make sure you're following this channel and subscribing.
Have your notifications on. We are the place to go on breaking news on YouTube and X. We're the only place for news.
And uh on X, we became the biggest platform for breaking news with thousands upon thousands of real
listeners. And we've been doing the exact same thing on YouTube. And wow, I'm so blessed that right now the YouTube is even bigger than the X. I never thought that in this short month
that we started this specific YouTube channel that we would grow so big. So guys, make sure you like this YouTube
and make sure you subscribe and have your notifications on. Larry gave some huge news and everyone make sure you
like. Yeah, thank you. Larry gave some huge news that he's saying Iran has a nuclear bomb. Yes, Iran has a nuclear
bomb. It is the great equalizer. When you look at all of the things that are occurring, you look at all the um things
that are happening, this basically will stop any kind of possible attack by
anybody, including Israel and maybe stop major escalations. I just want to thank
I am Valentina with the level one membership. Thanks for becoming an important part of the moral resistance
community. We're the next person we've got coming on is Ry McGovern. He is also
ex CIA. He is again also intelligence and uh um yeah we're going to give that
news. This is what's been tweeted by treaty. He says quote Iran just struck US targets in Kuwait after the US struck
Keshim today. Also, alarm just went off in Bahrain. Seems Iran is striking there, too. Iran Iranian sources tell me
Iran has stopped playing the tit for tat game. Instead, it's now striking back back at least one and a half times x as
hard for every attack against the US and Israel. Guys, we're going to continue giving the news. So, don't leave the YouTube or the X. If you're on the X, retweet. If you're on the YouTube, like.
Um, and we're just waiting for Ray McGovern to come. While we're waiting for Ry to come, I am going to um just
give you some more news, which is um
here one second. Let me just give you some more news.
The news is coming thick and fast. Okay, here we go. Um, okay. So there are reports saying that
the fighter activity over the was not enemy activity. So the fighter jet
activity over Iran was not enemy activity. So it doesn't look like that there are strikes in Iran. Okay.
Okay. Just looking for more news and obviously we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. Lots of
news coming out. I just want to give a recap for the audience because there's a large number of people who've joined.
Um so Iran struck a number of key locations. Those
locations were as follows. It was Let me get the locations up.
It was a number of bases in um a number of key bases in um in Kuwait, a number
of key bases in Bahrain. We heard sirens in um Dubai allegedly and also Saudi
Arabia. So guys, what we're going to do is like, comment, and subscribe. Have your notifications on. You see the link
that's pinned in the YouTube? go to that link because that link is the interview with Ry McGovern. As we're doing the
interview, as we're speaking to Ry about a number of issues, we will also be giving you the breaking news as per what we did with Larry Johnson. So, click on
that link and come across cuz that's where we are all moving to. Um, I'm just going to make sure we've got the thing
on to move everyone. Yes, we have. Okay, guys. So, see you guys there. Appreciate you guys joining in. I appreciate you
guys listening and for sure we will see you guys in a minute as well.
And uh yeah, I'm just waiting for the stream to load up on the new channel.
No, they Iran is defending itself and it's specifically targeting Kuwait because u you know the the Hellfire
missile I suspect that was fired by a drone not by a pilot and those drones apparently are coming out of Kuwait and
so that's why they're hitting both the air base and the uh army uh base in
Kuwait, US Army facility. So, uh, you know, the US is going to have to make a decision. Are they going to escalate?
And if they escalate, then that's the end of the ceasefire. Uh, and, you know, putting Donald Trump in a real real
pickle. You know, I I I heard I haven't verified it independently, but I was told um on an earlier broadcast uh with
Peter Kersonen that um the the Trump's popularity is now below 30%.
And I I find that quite believable.
We're also seeing that, you know, with the past manipulation of oil prices that the price prices now are climbing
because I think the oil market's waking up and realizing that this whole this whole thing about an imminent peace agreement was a complete fraud.
Yeah. And um guys, make sure you like this video and get as many people in here as possible. Very important
breaking news happening. Uh Larry, the Americans are b obviously the Americans
are denying that these missiles struck their targets. They're saying that Iran is lying. What's your thoughts on that? This is directly from Sencom.
Yeah, America's lying. If I'm telling the truth on this, Iran's not looking for a pretext. Uh you know, Iran is
content to let things run. It's it's United States attacking.
I mean, who who can give the United States any benefit of a doubt since they're the ones that in the midst of
peace negotiations or negotiations to secure and ensure that Iran did not have
a nuclear weapon, the United States betrayed those negotiations and used that as a pretext to launch that attack
on the 28th of February. Even though the mediator from you know the for I think he was the foreign minister of Oman
he was very very upbeat on the 26th of February said oh boy we got you know uh
things are looking really good I think we're making some real progress and that got blown to hell on the morning of the 28th of February.
Okay we've got some more breaking news.
Bahrain has closed its entire airspace until 400 p.m. All flights grounded amid fresh regional security alerts and Gulf
air defense activity. That's the latest news on that. We did hear earlier on today that Bahrain had cancelled their
flights to Iran and Iraq. Could that be in relation to this? Did they kind of smell something was coming?
Yeah, I'd say so. You know, I don't believe in coincidence.
So if it's if it's in fact um you know if if that is true then yeah that would that would show that they they knew this
was coming. They knew the United States was going to go after this Iranian tanker.
So the US uh Larry is saying that they don't want to escalate. They're trying to again play this down
the countries that were hit, the smaller Gulf countries like Kuwait, like Bahrain.
Um do you think this does escalate or do you think that Trump's as you mentioned because of the fear of the nuclear bomb, because of the fear of various other
things, Trump wants to play all of this down?
Yeah. Well, I think I think he's trying to play it down right now. um because of again because of that message that was
delivered to Marco Rubio pointing out that this this could advance to uh a demonstration that Iran has a nuke and I
think Trump and company want to avoid that embarrassment. I mean that would be a complete you know it would completely the the questions that would be coming
up at the press conference was wait you said you obliterated their capa capability.
Now, of course, they turn around and say, "See, we told you all along Iran was going to do this, but but um it is
the fact that Trump has avoided getting into the name calling and doing that kind of thing that he normally does uh
tells me that he he recognizes that this is this is quite serious and uh that, you know, they're trying to keep this from getting out of hand.
But in order to stop it from getting out of hand, the one thing you've got to do is to make sure that you don't cause the
initial confrontation that will cause this to get out of hand. And if you look at each one of these incidences,
every single one of these days have been initiated by the United States of America. So why produce?
Why attack and cause such a response when you know you don't have the ability, the capability to respond?
Yeah, I think a continued test that they they're not certain that Iran means what it says and that's why Iran's responding as it is. Yeah, we absolutely mean it.
Trust us and uh you know, we're not going to talk, we're going to do our talking with missiles now. We're not going to do our talking with words.
So, we have got some visuals. Actually, it's not. Yeah. Okay, it's posted. And guys, by the way, guys, when I'm looking down, it's cuz we're looking for news.
We're looking for new information and clips, but this visual should hopefully
show. And let me here here it is. Uh let me show a better
angle. Here we go. Um let me remove this off.
Okay. So you can see here hopefully you can see this American air defense failing in Kuwait after failing to destroy Iranian missile. So you can see
the Iranian missile does end up striking. So this kind of um debunks the claim, Larry, about them um stopping the missile.
Are you suggesting that the United States is lying? Oh my goodness.
Um yeah, I mean Yeah. Yeah, you are. And they are okay. Yeah.
Yeah. This is that we intercepted everything. Yeah.
Sure. Sure. Tell that to the people on the ground.
Now, I I I don't I don't rule out the the possibility that Iran in its missile
response is using what I'll call lower grade, lower capable missiles that they are using. That these are more just as a
reminder that okay, we're not hitting you with our full weight. We're just we're hitting you enough that you know we're serious about this, but if you
keep [ __ ] around, you're going to find out.
Yeah. And that's exactly what's happening. Larry, um just on this actually, let me get up the targets that
were struck in um these different locations. So, it was Ali alsu.
It was Arif John military US base in Kuwait. There was the US Navy fifth
fleet in Bahrain. There were also allegedly targets in the UAE. We did hear there were sirens in the UAE. We
also heard the possibility that there were sirens in Saudi Arabia. And then we also heard that the Separatists HQ,
which some call Mossad HQ in Bil also received consistent attacks as well.
What's your thoughts about those locations and why those specific locations are I I I don't see Iran attack doing
anything against the Saudis unless the Saudis allow their airspace to be used for attacks and I don't think the Saudis are
in fact I don't Qatar as well you know they're not um they've got the major air base in the area aloud but apparently
that air base is not being used for any kind of offensive operations against Iran As far as Bahrain, there is no
fifth fleet there anymore. Where the fifth fleet used to be located, where the fifth fleet headquarters used to be,
but uh now those those buildings, my understanding, basically empty. So, you know, the United States is not in a position to really do much damage to those.
So, if the fleets are empty and nonoperational, why would Iran waste their time attacking it? Well, that
again it's the West claiming that it's attacking it, not Iran.
I didn't see the RGC say we're hitting targets in Bahrain. Um the well this one claims this unless this is a fake one
but I'm being told this is a legitimate uh IGC statement. The one I read you know the one I read it Larry it says uh
in response to this aggression its air base and its helicopter base stationed in one of the countries in the region Kuwait as well as the headquarters of
the US fifth fleet in Bahrain was subjected to an attack by missiles and drones of the IRGC aerospace forces.
Okay.
Yeah. Well, they're they're attacking an empty shell because the fifth fleet command is not back in Bahrain. It'd be
insane to be back there. They don't have any protection.
So, so you think that this attack then, this specific attack on that specific base was more of a kind of
not an act, a reminder, a reminder.
You know, they may have the reason they may have targeted that was because the other the the other the what is it the
Pan or Panaya that Iran hit as sort of a tit for tat. You hit our ship, we'll hit your ship.
Yeah. Now, um we also saw that the telecommunication another telecommunication radar was hitting Kashm Island. I brought this up
to you the other day, Larry. They are starting to consistently hit a number of telecommunication and radars on the straight of Hermoose. As someone who is intelligence, how important is that?
Like if they take enough out, what would that do?
Well, it depends. Um I I and and so I start with the assumption that Iran is
not dependent upon one type of communication system.
uh they have both visible systems that are above ground, but I I think they also have other systems uh some below
ground. Uh and you can't rule out that they've also created decoys.
42 minutesThey'll create a if you will a a target that looks like a communications node.
Turns out that it isn't. But if if the United States plan is to, you know, gradually try to wipe out the ability to
communicate between these units, then that could be a prelude to another attack. You know, maybe try to insert
ground forces. But but I don't think the US is there yet because I I'm just I'm not hearing the chatter that you normally would hear that if that kind of
major operation was planned uh then there would be activities undergirling it that would be underway right now and I'm not seeing or hearing that.
Well that's interesting because we've got some news that suggests the opposite but then I guess this could be just fake reporting. Uh but there is some news
claiming air defense activity is reported or in Isvahan. Lo locals within western Thran are reporting a possible
power cut and also locals in um in western Thran are also reporting aerial
jet activity. Now this may not be a US attack. It could be for example Iranian jets. It could be for example power that has been cut by Iran themselves because
of certain defense procedures they're putting in place. It could also be that the air defense activity is ready for anything possible even though it may not
be coming. But these are the latest and breaking news.
Well, and also consider that what might be taking place over Ishvahan is a US drone trying to do intelligence
collection and the Iranian air defense systems naturally would engage that target. They've shot they've shot down
over 25 MQ9 Reapers and several MQ1 Predators over
the course of the last, you know, 12, 13 weeks. So that that that could be another explanation. I I do think it's
more likely that the the air traffic that they're hearing over Iran is Iranian air traffic, not US air traffic.
Fair enough. Fair enough. That makes sense. That does actually make sense cuz you I remember you mentioning to me that if something like that was to be happening, you would be hearing chatter
at least about 5 to before something happened.
Yeah. There's a whole a whole host of let's call them bureaucratic things, message messages that have to be sent,
messages received. um you know uh and when you get get up to what's called an execute order um you know they they
issue first the flow is there's what issued a a concept of operations and then the uh or there's an alert warning
order and then the the units that are actually going to carry out the military activity they have to go back with a proposed con concept of operations and
then that concept of operations is accepted or modified communicated back down the line and then that becomes the plan and then they have
to wait for the execution order. So, uh I I don't think we're at that stage yet.
But again, I'm not I'm not sitting in any of the uh command centers monitoring that message traffic.
Yeah. Yeah. Um and guys, make sure you like the YouTube and retweet the X.
We've got so many people on both and people need to are here for the breaking news. Let's get as many people in here as possible. Um, so
just bringing this back over. So previously when there was an attack on UAE and there was an attack on Saudi, there was this kind of annoyance with
the United States of America when they didn't respond.
This time the attacks, let's say they were only on Kuwait and Bahrain.
Would there be the same level of angst amongst the Gulf States or do you think they're going to just let this slide?
No, I think well it's sending a message.
Now my understanding is that both Qatar and the Saudis were basically saying okay with us we're going to we're going
to push your bases out. I think Qatar has given the United States 9 months to relocate aloud which that that's going to be
significant if if true but again that comes that comes from the same source that said uh Iran's going to pull out of
the negotiations. Iran's going to withdraw from the non-prololiferation treaty and Iran's going to do a nuke
demonstration and then pointed out as well that this is there has been a decided shift in the attitudes of key
Gulf states like I call Saudis and Qataris those are the t two key Gulf
states because of the volume of sulfur ura helium oil liquid natural gas that
is produced between those two. They're far more important than Kuwait, Bahrain or the UAE.
What's um you know when you me when do you in terms of a timeline when do you think they basically leave the MPT or when do you think they actually do their
test? You explain how they're going to do the test, but what was the date you said again?
Well, I I think I think it depends a large measure on the US what it does. So
far, at least Trump has tried to reign in BB Netanyahu as not not it hasn't
been necessarily fully effective. Um, and the United States, as you've acknowledged earlier, they're not retaliating and they're making emphasis.
No, no, the the ceasefire still holds.
We still we're still abiding by the ceasefire.
So, uh, and and it makes no sense because they're not abiding by the ceasefire. if
they're attacking an Iranian flag vessel.
So there's no plans of actually leaving the MPT, doing the test. They're looking at what the situation's going to how the situation is going to unfold.
Well, my reading of it is it's let's call it it's an escalatory ladder.
They've taken the first step. We're cutting off the talks.
Second step would be we're withdrawing from the NPT. I I didn't receive no information giving the guidance upon
when that would happen or under what conditions. Similarly with the de nuclear explosion demonstration
we got no further details upon under what what would be the triggering uh activity or activities that would
lead Iran to say okay we've got to we have to do this now. But it's the point is it's moving in a direction away from
an agreement instead of towards an agreement.
Yeah. And we actually got a chat here which uh is actually true cuz I had to double check here which is that Russian news are saying and it's not just Russian news. It's been throughout
saying the billiondoll Patriot system spectacularly fails right after launch in Kuwait because we've got visuals of
the interceptors failing in order to try and stop these uh missiles. Well, I mean, I I I'm surprised they even have
some interceptors left because the number of the packs pack three missiles is way down. And and understand they got
to fire two of those against if there's if Iran has fired one missile, that means they got to fire two packs. If
Iran has fired four missiles, they've got to fire eight packs. So, just, you know, do the math at a minimum.
in terms of um you you mentioned this right and there was a report saying that in this previous confrontation the 39
day war Iran made sorry Israel made the United States of America use their supply more so and so the US is
significantly more depleted than even Israel what's your understanding and if that's the case as per what you said
like there's not going to be much to go around for the Gulf states what's your understanding of how something like that would even happen.
Well, let's be clear as well. Israel's in no great shape either. It's not like they've got a they're husbanding a bunch
of very effective missiles. The Israeli Iron Dome is less effective than uh the
Patriot missile. The Israeli iron Iron Dome is good against subsonic rockets that the Hezbollah used to launch from
the north. uh but ballistic missiles or the drones uh not effective or minimally effective.
So um this is whatever they're using though if they are actually firing some Patriot missile batteries every missile
they fire is one more missile that the United States cannot replace anytime soon. So it ends up depleting the US stock.
Yeah. And so one of the things you mentioned, Larry, was when you look at the US stock and how they've shared it between Ukraine, how they've shared it
between um the gold state and Israel, they're severely depleted. Um I mean, even these
strikes will be depleting the stock even more so, right? Mhm.
And yeah, I mean it's like I said, if they're firing, they'll fire a minimum of two. Sometimes they'll fire three or
four at the same time at the same target.
But uh you know what what what's clear is that um the United States does not have unlimited supplies and they've been
having to cannibalize supplies from other countries uh other theaters such as the Pacific theater.
So this you know uh we're back in this uh I'll call it the waiting game. We're going to wait and see what the United States does to uh respond.
Um yeah, and guys, we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. The news is a bit more lighter at the moment. Obviously, we do keep checking for updates at the same time.
Uh Larry, um you know, you mentioned I know I'm a bit excited about the nuclear bomb and actually that's what the conversation about today was going to be. I even had the post ready. Iran has a nuclear bomb.
Uh but then this breaking news took over so I changed the poster. But the point was is um in terms of one of these
countries possibly giving Iran the nuclear bomb, would that not cause major issues in terms of the way they have to
deal with America? And so what I mean by that is for example, let's say it was Pakistan. Well, Pakistan is vehemently connected to the America in a number of
ways. I know you we've discussed this many times and how you believe they're moving away and various other things, but someone like them would never want
to draw the ear of the United States of America. Same with China in the sense of China obviously isn't afraid of the US,
but at the same time they don't want this kind of combative nature. And so other than possibly North Korea, how in
what scenario would any of these countries even have the Kutzbah to even give the nuclear bomb to Iran?
Well, I don't think they necessarily gave the nuclear bomb to Iran. Um I I
think what I'm hearing is more assistance and developing uh a functional warhead that could fit on any
of the Iranian missiles. So to that extent they are um
it's it's it's an Iranian creation but it's been it's had had support uh from one of the other countries. Um, but it's
all being done in the context of not to initiate or escalate the war into a nuclear war. Rather to force the United
States and Israel to re-evaluate their strategy to say, "Okay, we got to stop attacking
uh we've got to stop attacking Iran just like the same reason we don't attack North Korea because they do have a nuke
and they could use it and we don't want we don't want to go down that road.
Okay. So, this is an Iranian creation with some support by some other country
that has the expertise in this area is what you're saying, right? That that that's what I've been told.
Okay. And now again, can I I can't independently verify that, but the the source came
from uh a person that's in a position to know that this is true.
That's huge. And um the other uh question I have for you is you mentioned how the the nuke would be used in a
defensive posture. How they're going to be used in you know the different moralistic logistical reasons they'll be
used. That being said obviously there is this fatwa by the previous leader of Iran say Ali alham which prohibited it.
So therefore, I'm presuming that his son say alham will have to or probably did
maybe didn't do it publicly issue a new fatwa a new ruling to supersede the ruling of his father.
Very possible. I mean, I I argued early on that I could see him doing that having, you know, having watched his
wife and daughter being killed by the Americans and his mother and father that, you know, just human human nature
alone dictates that you can't set back and let that happen and do nothing in response.
But uh I also believe that he is he is a man of deep faith and conviction and
he's not going to uh carelessly throw away you know Islamic teaching and
doctrine. Uh he will he will remain faithful to that. Uh and so um again I
think what Iran's looking at is a measure of last resort.
Um, in other words, you know, they this isn't their first option. This is their uh last option.
Yeah. Yeah. It's a deterrence, right?
I'm I'm actually someone who only believes in defensive war. I think if you have a nuclear bomb, it probably stops more war than actually causes and you just know that you're never going to
use it. Uh, and hopefully no one will use it against you and you never have to use it.
Right. No. Exactly. Right. Um because the whole issue with Israel is that it is the nuclear bomb that gives them the
gall to act in the manner that they do because like we know you know Larry they don't have the military capability to
succeed in many of these fronts that they're trying to succeed in whether it's Lebanon whether it's in Gaza whether it's in Iran. Now they know that
defeat will come but what they also obviously always fear is the idea that they would be demolished in and I mean
that in terms of their military being demolished and if they were to get into an expansive war with someone like Iran their country would be demolished and decimated.
Yes.
And then in their mind sorry no go ahead go ahead. Sorry.
And in their mind they think that if that was to happen we'll just nuke them.
We've got all these nukes. We'll just nuke them. So this equalizes that, right? And maybe it may that Yeah, that forces them to say,
"Okay, if we nuke them, they could nuke us." And Israel, I use the imagery of a giant
sumo wrestler fighting a [ __ ] fighting a little person who's say 3'6 in tall and weighs
uh, you know, 30 kilos. Um the the
little person can can only absorb a few blows from a massive sumo wrestler
whereas the suma wrestler could you know it could it could take hits all day from the uh little person and not flinch.
So Iran has prepared the contingency for being attacked with nuclear weapons. At
least it's secured ballistic missiles. production facilities etc. underground in hardened
hardened shelters that uh and as we've seen uh in the last uh 7 weeks, 8 weeks,
they've been digging out the ones that were damaged or where they the US attempted to close the entrances and they failed. They were dug out.
And you mentioned about you gave the example of sumo wrestler and a [ __ ] and just for the audience because we know that obviously Israel has a large
number of nuclear bombs. But on the other hand, Iran is a very huge place with a 90 million population. Iran is as big as Alaska. It's a huge huge country.
And so it's the seven it's the 17th largest country in the world. 17th largest country in the world.
But then Iran, Israel has a large number of nuclear bombs. The number obviously no one knows, but the claim is that it could be even in the hundreds.
On the other hand, Iran may have, as you mentioned, three, but Israel is a tiny place and more than that, Larry. It's a
tiny place, but actually most of Israel is actually deserted. There's actually three or four key areas where there is
Israelis, right? So almost it equalizes it. What's your thoughts on that, Lori?
Yeah. Well, again, that size differential allows, you got to ask um
if you dropped one nuke on Israel and one nuke on Iran um
and let's say they were dropped on military targets.
Iran has far more military targets that would actually exhaust an Israeli supply, whereas Israel's got a very,
very finite number of military targets that are relatively easy to hit. Again, that's saying if this thing goes hot, goes beyond what it is right now.
I mean, the thing is you you mentioned military targets, um, Larry, but the Israelis won't target military targets. That's going to be the problem.
Oh, yeah. Well, they they'll target civilians, but then they're going to be in worse worse shape now or worse shape then than they are right now. And
they're already suffering massive massive public relations damage.
Well, I don't think they care about public relation damage, though, Larry.
If they cared about it, they wouldn't have acted in the manner they've acted over this entire three years.
Well, they calculated they could get away with it, but now what they're discovering is they can't. And that is,
you know, that's sort of what has created the challenge for them. They they've they've jumped into the abyss and they don't have any good way back.
Yes. Yeah. They don't. And this has been the major problem, right? That they're obvious obviously disliked.
They're obviously not respected. Um but despite that being the case, um I don't think they care about that. I think they
think that look, everyone hates us anyway. Let's do what we got to do.
Let's get what we want and then later people will forget about it. People forgot about when America used the nuclear bomb. People will forget that we did it. This is their psychology and I
don't think that impacts them. I think that won't stop them doing what they plan to do.
2 minutesWell, no, you you may be correct. I can't argue with that. I think that's a reasonable argument.
Um Larry, the other question I've got for you is um looking at what's happened now, do you think this now doubles down or do you think that there is going to
be more escalation tomorrow? Do you think the GCC countries are going to start forcing Trump to do something or do you think because of this whole nuclear bomb situation that you referred
to, this is now Trump's just going to do everything in his power not to go to war?
Um I think it will continue to escalate.
Now, at the same time though, as we've seen so far, Trump is avoiding escalating it. And and I think they re
recognizes that if he does escalate, if he does start retaliating to this, it it's it's going to threaten the entire
US presence in the Persian Gulf and it's going to further discredit the United States in the eyes of the Saudi Arabia
and Qatar and Oman and probably Kuwait too because Kuwait said, "Why are you making
us the target?" you know, why why are you bringing all this, you know, this madness to us? Uh so
that, you know, we're trying to get away from this. We're not trying to get embroiled in more.
But isn't that because Kuwait's using America's using Kuwait to launch these attacks on Iran even now? If Kuwait wanted out of it, they could.
Yeah. Yeah. Well, that that's and that's the issue right there that if uh the United States wants to uh put an end to
this, then they've got to stop launching attacks from these Gulf countries or those Gulf countries need to stand up themselves and say stop. You're not
going to do any more of these attacks from here.
Exactly. But then they're not doing that. I I know your your position is Saudi Arabia aren't and possibly Qatar aren't. uh but we know that for example
Kuwait our Bahrain our UAE is um and so those are key allies that are doing
something. Now in terms of UAE Larry why has the Iran not struck the UAE in these strikes if if they well again if if if there were no
launches of drones or aircraft from uh UAE that attacked Iran Iran's not going to attack them. M
yeah you know sending a very clear message you don't hit me I don't hit you what do you want to do
there was um a report this was relayed by uh a few people such as treaty and the claim was this Larry it was that as
part of this kind of deal that they were going to put together between the US and Iran that there was this understanding that if Israel breaks the deal as in if
Israel bombs another country Israel sorry bombs Lebanon then Iran as a response would be able to bomb the UAE and that would be the kind of equalizer.
You bomb Lebanon, an ally of Iran, Iran bombs your ally, which is the UAE, and that would stop both sides from
basically breaking the deal. What's what's your understanding or thoughts of that?
Well, I'm sure that's one of the one of the policy positions calculated by Iran.
But again, this is this thing is dynamic. We we we have a sort of an everchanging picture and right now the picture says warning.
It's flashing a warning lights because um this this thing could escalate out of hand.
Yeah. Um no doubt. And obviously we continue to give you the breaking news.
We got Larry on. We got Larry. We've got your friend on next as well. We got um Ray McGovern on next.
Oh, okay. Yeah. We'll give you a good rundown.
Yeah. And then we got uh Anthony Aguilera as well. So, we're not going anywhere. But Larry, always appreciate you coming on. I know that they've been working you. We've all been working you
really hard, Larry. You've been doing about seven or eight podcasts a day. I was looking through your Substack on Sonar 21 yesterday. So, on uh Sona 21, which is on Substack and your website.
And it was like seven or six or seven podcasts. I was like, you're grinding, Larry.
Yeah, it's a it's it's a grind, but it's worth it trying to get good information out to people. Ask people to think about
things. Don't get uh overwhelmed or flooded with the propaganda. Learn how to discern what's true, what isn't. And
I and certainly, man, I congratulate you on the good work you're doing. Talk about grinding, man. Appreciate you, Larry.
You're Yeah, but you're young. You could you can you could do this.
True. True. Although I don't feel it sometimes, Larry. But yeah, I I Larry, we always appreciate you. Really value you. The fact that you're getting the
truth out there, the information out there. We need more people like you. So, thank you so much for joining us and everyone should be following your Substack. I know I read it every night.
Even if I'm tired, then I'll skim a read it. I'll skim read it and just look at like some of it, but yeah, definitely. Well, I I appreciate that, my friend.
7 minutesYou stay well and I'm sure we'll be talking again this week.
Definitely. Definitely. It's going to go down. Thank you so much, Larry, for joining us. That was Larry Johnson.
Make sure you're following him and subscribing. We're continuing on guys, so don't leave, but make sure you're following this channel and subscribing.
Have your notifications on. We are the place to go on breaking news on YouTube and X. We're the only place for news.
And uh on X, we became the biggest platform for breaking news with thousands upon thousands of real
listeners. And we've been doing the exact same thing on YouTube. And wow, I'm so blessed that right now the YouTube is even bigger than the X. I never thought that in this short month
that we started this specific YouTube channel that we would grow so big. So guys, make sure you like this YouTube
and make sure you subscribe and have your notifications on. Larry gave some huge news and everyone make sure you
like. Yeah, thank you. Larry gave some huge news that he's saying Iran has a nuclear bomb. Yes, Iran has a nuclear
bomb. It is the great equalizer. When you look at all of the things that are occurring, you look at all the um things
that are happening, this basically will stop any kind of possible attack by
anybody, including Israel and maybe stop major escalations. I just want to thank
I am Valentina with the level one membership. Thanks for becoming an important part of the moral resistance
community. We're the next person we've got coming on is Ry McGovern. He is also
ex CIA. He is again also intelligence and uh um yeah we're going to give that
news. This is what's been tweeted by treaty. He says quote Iran just struck US targets in Kuwait after the US struck
Keshim today. Also, alarm just went off in Bahrain. Seems Iran is striking there, too. Iran Iranian sources tell me
Iran has stopped playing the tit for tat game. Instead, it's now striking back back at least one and a half times x as
hard for every attack against the US and Israel. Guys, we're going to continue giving the news. So, don't leave the YouTube or the X. If you're on the X, retweet. If you're on the YouTube, like.
Um, and we're just waiting for Ray McGovern to come. While we're waiting for Ry to come, I am going to um just
give you some more news, which is um
here one second. Let me just give you some more news.
The news is coming thick and fast. Okay, here we go. Um, okay. So there are reports saying that
the fighter activity over the was not enemy activity. So the fighter jet
activity over Iran was not enemy activity. So it doesn't look like that there are strikes in Iran. Okay.
Okay. Just looking for more news and obviously we'll continue to give you the news as and when we receive it. Lots of
news coming out. I just want to give a recap for the audience because there's a large number of people who've joined.
Um so Iran struck a number of key locations. Those
locations were as follows. It was Let me get the locations up.
It was a number of bases in um a number of key bases in um in Kuwait, a number
of key bases in Bahrain. We heard sirens in um Dubai allegedly and also Saudi
Arabia. So guys, what we're going to do is like, comment, and subscribe. Have your notifications on. You see the link
that's pinned in the YouTube? go to that link because that link is the interview with Ry McGovern. As we're doing the
interview, as we're speaking to Ry about a number of issues, we will also be giving you the breaking news as per what we did with Larry Johnson. So, click on
that link and come across cuz that's where we are all moving to. Um, I'm just going to make sure we've got the thing
on to move everyone. Yes, we have. Okay, guys. So, see you guys there. Appreciate you guys joining in. I appreciate you
guys listening and for sure we will see you guys in a minute as well.
And uh yeah, I'm just waiting for the stream to load up on the new channel.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 41051
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am
Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN
by admin » Wed Jun 03, 2026 7:01 pm
https://t.me/CYBER_HANDALA/179
Statement of the Handala Cyber Command
We hereby inform the honorable people and heroic fighters of the Resistance Front that, as we had previously promised, in the early hours of today, following the aggression of the U.S. terrorist military, a targeted and large-scale combined operation was carried out. During this operation, an updated and newly classified target database of U.S. terrorist military bases was provided by the Handala Cyber Command to the active missile and drone units of the proud Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and all of these classified bases were successfully struck for the first time.
It should be noted that the statement issued by the terrorist CENTCOM command claiming that all launched missiles were intercepted is entirely false, and all objectives of this operation were successfully achieved.
As also stated in last week’s report to the U.S. Congress, the complete details of officers serving in the U.S. terrorist military’s naval fleet, as well as the classified bases where they are stationed throughout the region, are known to Handala. Should acts of aggression continue, this updated and classified target database will be subjected to devastating strikes by Resistance missiles.
Given the presence of some of the families of these terrorist officers near these classified bases in recent days, we warn that, just as happened in the early hours of today, a few minutes before the missiles struck their designated targets, you received an urgent message on your mobile phones from Handala instructing you to immediately leave your location, and all of your details are known to us. Therefore, we strongly advise that you leave the countries of the region as soon as possible together with your husbands and children, because this new and irreversible order in the Persian Gulf cannot be changed. You have no place in this region, and the consequences of maintaining your presence here will be painful.
We issue a firm warning to the terrorist CENTCOM command: in the event of any further aggression, your most secret bases will face a far more extensive and painful response.
Handala Cyber Command
Statement of the Handala Cyber Command
We hereby inform the honorable people and heroic fighters of the Resistance Front that, as we had previously promised, in the early hours of today, following the aggression of the U.S. terrorist military, a targeted and large-scale combined operation was carried out. During this operation, an updated and newly classified target database of U.S. terrorist military bases was provided by the Handala Cyber Command to the active missile and drone units of the proud Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and all of these classified bases were successfully struck for the first time.
It should be noted that the statement issued by the terrorist CENTCOM command claiming that all launched missiles were intercepted is entirely false, and all objectives of this operation were successfully achieved.
As also stated in last week’s report to the U.S. Congress, the complete details of officers serving in the U.S. terrorist military’s naval fleet, as well as the classified bases where they are stationed throughout the region, are known to Handala. Should acts of aggression continue, this updated and classified target database will be subjected to devastating strikes by Resistance missiles.
Given the presence of some of the families of these terrorist officers near these classified bases in recent days, we warn that, just as happened in the early hours of today, a few minutes before the missiles struck their designated targets, you received an urgent message on your mobile phones from Handala instructing you to immediately leave your location, and all of your details are known to us. Therefore, we strongly advise that you leave the countries of the region as soon as possible together with your husbands and children, because this new and irreversible order in the Persian Gulf cannot be changed. You have no place in this region, and the consequences of maintaining your presence here will be painful.
We issue a firm warning to the terrorist CENTCOM command: in the event of any further aggression, your most secret bases will face a far more extensive and painful response.
Handala Cyber Command
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 41051
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am
Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN
by admin » Wed Jun 03, 2026 7:04 pm
Pepe Escobar : Does Iran Have the Bomb? Part 1
Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom
Streamed live 2 hours ago
Transcript
Undeclared wars are commonplace.
Tragically, our government engages in preemptive war, otherwise known as aggression, with no complaints, from the
American people. Sadly, we have become accustomed to living with the illegitimate use of force by government.
To develop a truly free society, the issue of initiating force must be understood and rejected.
What if sometimes to love your country you had to alter or abolish the government? What if Jefferson was right?
What if that government is best which governs least?
What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong? What if it is better to perish fighting for freedom
than to live as a slave? What if freedom's greatest hour of danger is now?
1 minuteHi everyone, Judge Andrew Npalitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Wednesday, June 3rd, 2026. Our dear, intrepid
friend Pepe Escobar joins us now. Pepe, thank you very much for your time as always.
Greetings from Moscow, judge. Very important. Yes, I know you're in Moscow and you will soon be in St. Petersburg, which I understand was was attacked by
drones today and you and I have a lot of friends there. I trust that everybody is okay.
Uh I saw a comment from Dimmitri Peskov indicating that nobody was hurt. Of course, the government wasn't happy, but
nobody was hurt. But let's get right to our topic. Just a second, uh judge. It's important. Uh this is in the outskirts of St.
Petersburg and slightly far away from the airport. So, it's not inside the city.
Got it. Got it. Um, let's get right to the topic at hand
uh from you and Larry. Larry is on shortly after you in about two and a half hours uh from now. The two of you
have opined to me and others that you have sources which have informed you
that Iran has a nuclear device, a deliberable nuclear device. Is that true? What do they have and how do you know it?
Well, first of all, uh we revealed that I would say the soft launch of a new uh
platform called Powers Shift. Uh Larry and I are involved in this project. Uh
it's about deep info, deep intel, deep analysis, and we hope that it's going to
work. And of course we would like to invite uh many of our mutual friends in the weeks ahead to be part of it as
well. Well the information is absolutely surefire judge and I was very skeptical
from the beginning. I asked our Pakistani uh connection to can you grill
this guy again and again and again and at the end we got a definitive answer.
Look, uh, if I didn't want you to break the story, I wouldn't never have given it to you. Well, very very important the
context. Uh, I I I think I sent you judge uh the column that I published I think two two or three days ago, which
is more or less the background that led to what happened last week. And the most important thing that last that happened
last week was a phone call on May 28th.
That was uh last Thursday between uh Iranian President Pzashkin and the Pakistani Prime Minister Shabbaz
Sharif. So why did this happen? because Pakistan as our audience knows very well
they are the sole mediator towards a possible memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran. So we had this
phone call Thursday last week and this is what our sources revealed to us and this this is the bombshell in itself.
Pzashkin to Sharif over the phone directly. He delivered a very well ststructured
three-step sort of ultimatum that he said to Sharif should be uh
communicated to the White House immediately. Number one, which is something that the Iranians have been uh
insisting on for the past few weeks, no nuclear talks. That's it. Unless we go to stage number one, end of our wars.
Stage numbers number number two, we start discussing straight news. Then we have nuclear talks.
Number point number two, no more prospective nuclear treaty framework.
These were the words that our source uh meaning nothing like the JCPOA.
Exactly. Not even getting towards a JCPOA which considering the circumstances the best the Trump
administration can get now is a sort of diluted JCPOA. And the Iranians are saying no not even that because first
you need to go to stage one and two end of all wars and then we start discussing horm without that we discuss nothing
and then the number three which is at the heart of what we revealed on Monday and of course there's a lot of
controversy more than expected everywhere. Pesashkin said, "If American threats persist,
we can go for the detonation of a nuclear device on Iranian soil without specifying.
Is this a bomb that Iran already has? Is this a bomb that Iran only Iran
developed? Is this a bomb that they could count on Russian input to develop or it was delivered readym made let's
put it this way by Pakistan or by North Korea nothing uh the source did not elaborate
on that he was elaborating on what Pzashkin actually told Sharif so this
detonation would happen in in the words of Pzashkin translated via uh by our
source executed not as an act of war but as an irreversible ible sovereign
demonstration of capability to control scalation dominance.
o my first interpretation judge when when I get this and I start asking questions until we got the final answer
from the okay this is it it's more than reconfirmed otherwise I wouldn't even bother to give this information to you
guys if was telling sharif all of the above this means that he was cleared by
ayatahaba kame so this means this is a mustaba directive if this if the
Americans go over every possible red line which is uh happening as we speak. There will be a
demonstration. There will be no more nuclear ambiguity and they will have an undeniable demonstration and obviously
we can imagine the consequences for the global non-puriphilation system. What's going to be right? So this is it. So
it's extremely nuanced and very very important judge and I'm breaking this to you now ahead of everybody else. I am
waiting for a response whatever that is from somebody
very very close to Moshaba Kame. This was organized via our friends of the
cradle. I am the lead international columnist whatever for the cradle in Beirut. So I sent them my article, my
new article which is already written uh containing everything that I explained to you a few minutes ago. So this is
getting to u in front of this guy who is very very close to the supreme leader and we are waiting for a response. Uh they said that it might happen tonight.
So tomorrow we're going to have a response total denial plausible deniability whatever. But if whatever he responds,
we plan to publish the column because I tell the whole timeline, everything that happened last week, what led to uh this
uh phone call between Pzashkin and Sharif, and then what happened afterwards, which was uh foreign minister Dar
telling the whole story to Marco Rubio in person one day after that at the uh in question.
So this is where did the uh Iranians acquire uh a nuclear device?
Well, this is we already have uh a story that might shed light on what h has been
happening for the past few decades. In fact, judge and of course with Pakistani help. Uh we would like to tell the story next week, Larry and myself once again.
Well, we're going to have to go through this intelligence carefully. Uh get confirmation and then we can reveal next
week. But well, do you do you have do you have a gut feeling or an instinct? Did they develop it on their own or did someone
sell it or bring it to them in which case there's a a limited number of sources? All all all scenarios are
possible a judge first of all because this is so sensitive that nobody will ever confirm anything on the record
about what really took place. So this is the first time that we have
perhaps an indirect a direct indirect confirmation via the president of Iran in a phone
call with the prime minister of Pakistan that they are able to detonate a nuclear device without specifics of course and
of course I'm not expecting this gentleman very close to leader Moshaba Came to spill the beams about it.
Right. Right.
So there's going to be a lot of guess work. Okay. How did they obtain that?
Was that indigenous scientific proess by Iranian uh physicists and engineer?
Quite possible because they are extremely capable. Number one. Number two, did they have outside help? There are three major candidates for that.
Russia, Pakistan, North Korea. North Korea is a very very good candidate. In
my previous travels to Thran in the 2010s, I was always bumping into North Korean
delegations. Very very interesting. But they would never talk to us because they don't talk to foreigners. They were always huddle in their group, but they
would never talk to anybody. So there were a high level North Korean delegations in all the time. So th this might have involved a nuclear
cooperation as well. and the Pakistani story. We hope to at least tell the story next week of how Pakistan have
been collaborating with the Iranian nuclear program for the past few decades in fact. So all options are plausible.
Wow.
Do the CIA, MI6 and Mossad know what you have just
revealed to us? They obviously know it because you're saying it in public, but did they know about this beforehand?
We would have to ask and obviously there'll be plausible deniability everywhere. But uh in the story that we
plan to talk about next week, uh Larry, there is a Mossad component and there is an Indian component as well. The RW
uh Indian Intel apparatus. They were aware that was very close nuclear collaboration between Pakistan and
Russian and Mossad also knew. Mossad had to know. Yeah.
Does Russian intel does Chinese intel know about this?
I I can it's it's too early to tell judge uh Russia maybe I'll have a chance tomorrow in St. Petersburg or on Friday
to talk to some of my connections. Uh in fact I will present this directly to them. I say okay how do you read this
China well for for and it's and it's a pity because this thing broke when I was leaving China. I left Shanghai this
weekend. I was in Shanghai until Saturday in fact and we learned the final contours of the story when Larry
and I were talking about it on Monday only through the weekend. So this is something that will have to return to China and and obviously China won't this
this is for them this is a ultra matter of national security but there's an extra element that is very very
interesting that happened between yesterday and today judge guess who is the special envoy of the government in
Thran for high level Iran China relations Galibbath and Galibah.
That's the speaker of the parliament.
The speaker of the parliament. This is an extra role for Galibbah. Very, very close strategic partnership. Iran, China.
Do and foreign minister Arachi get along? Yes, they do.
The Americans are spreading words that these guys are antagonistic.
Now, both presidentkin is resigning and they don't know who to talk to. So sorry J this is total first of all
because they are uh in the political sphere together uh in the parliament and in the foreign
ministry uh the the only difference is that Galibav has an IRGC background but
and not Arai it doesn't matter now because now let's say the political factors and the military factors in tan
they merge And something that is absolutely impossible for people in Washington to understand
the aglutinator is Moshaba under ultraheavy protection. Of course,
he has to be. But he's he may he is wounded. There's no question about that.
But he's very very sharp and he's coordinating everything. So he has personal meetings with all of the above
from the foreign ministry to of course Galibah who's very close to him as well and the top ARGC leadership.
Let me ask you what uh John Mirshimer raised and that is is there more than
one nuclear device because if they only have one are they going to waste it on a demonstration in the desert? Uh that's a that's another thing that we don't know.
Nobody knows and obviously we will have a confirmation from anybody not to mention from Iraq. So they might have a
few quite quite possible if they had only one they would never waste it on a demonstration and and the way and this
is very important judge uh if you analyze the words at least the words
that we assume were used by possession in Farsy that's complicated because this
is Farsy translated to English and probably Farsy translated to Udo translated to English so we hope this is
not lost in translation but anyway he said that if American provocations go beyond all the current thresholds
they will consider um this demonstr this nuclear demonstration as a test as a symbol of
sovereignty so I'm I'm already imagining what uh the man that uh we we are in
touch with close to MTA what's going to be his response probably is going to be plausible deniability.
If you're if everything you're saying is accurate, this is a basis in the minds of
Netanyahu and his cohorts and Trump and his for the attacks in June and February, is it not?
Could be. Could be. Uh but then you have to interpret in reverse.
I doubt I I doubt if they had any um evidence three months ago that Iran was
on the brink of detonating a nuclear weapon.
They don't have that kind of intelligence with the top IRGC. They don't.
Well, very important. So if there is plausible deniability, which is probably going to be uh the likely response,
we're going to hear something along the lines of uh yes, uh leader Moraba Kam is
reviewing the nuclear posture since the first fatwa by Kmeni and the second fatwa by Kame.
And this now is on the table because now we are in the middle of an existential threat
is already it's already discussed openly in uh Iran judge that Iran will have to revise his nuclear posture.
Is the fatwa issued by his father still the law of the land number one. Yes. Is he able to supersede that fatwa?
Well, as supreme leader now, he has the institutional authority to do that.
That's very very important. Of course, he's going to have to explain this in I would say infinitismal detail because
this is at the heart of Shiite theology according to which a nuclear bomb is unislamic because it kills civilians deliberately.
o he would have to frame it in a theological political way which is a very complex as
exercise to explain the change. But now there is a widespread popular consensus
in Iran that they need something like this otherwise these provocations will continue add infinitum and that's what's
changed. Let me uh switch gears for a minute before we uh conclude.
Um Axios reported of course on President Trump using very harsh, even vulgar language toward uh Prime Minister Netanyahu. I'm sure you've seen this.
Yeah, sure.
The president said to Netanyahu, "You're effing crazy." Trump fumes at Netanyahu in call on Lebanon. Uh you'd be in
prison if it weren't for me. I'm saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.
Netanyahu basically said, I had a conversation with the president uh and it's not going to change what we're doing. This position of ours remains
unchanged. The IDF will continue to operate as planned in southern Lebanon.
So, first question, was this real or was it performative?
Uh well it looks like a very uh stage style or WWF kind of thing
completely but uh the main that would be that Trump is bringing to the front lawn of the White House.
You bet. It's like a cage match in front of the White House which I cannot think of anything more bad taste than that but
that's another story. uh he's not exactly a an aesthetic model or a cultural model, right? But anyway, he he
confirmed it himself. Uh judge, if I'm not mistaken, I think I saw it on NBC or whatever a few hours said was true.
We'll run the confirmation, Chris. I think it's number six.
You were angry with him. You said, "Are you effing crazy? What are you effing doing?" Um uh I helped you stay out of
jail. Is that true? Did you speak to him in those terms?
I did. I I wouldn't say angry. I was a little bit perturbed at his uh
constantly fighting with Lebanon. You know, at some point I said maybe we got to stop this. We got to stop it.
Oh gosh. And and this is very serious just because what's happening southern Lebanon is Gaza 2.0 zero in a smaller scale, but it's exactly the same thing.
Wow.
Destruction of whole villages and civilian populations. When I was in
Lebanon last year, I saw what Israel did uh uh during the fake ceasefire.
They destroy everything inside. I visited two villages on the border, different parts of the border, and they
were completely destroyed. And this is exactly what they're doing again.
Wow. All right, Pepe, I have to let you go. This is all dynamite. Uh Larry is watching us now because he knows that he
and I will be discussing the same thing in in two hours.
Uh and if this uh matures into anything beyond what we've talked about, Chris will find you. Safe travels. Thank you.
Russia, my dear man. Tomorrow is another story, Judge.
tomorrow. Uh there's going to be a lot of discussion about what what's going to happen to Ukraine afterwards.
All right. You uh you you let you let us know. You'll be with uh Ritter.
Uh if I hope so. We have to if you can find Ritter and Chris can find the two of you and the internet works. We'll do a show together.
We could ask the bar Scott Ritter what's going to happen in Ukraine. How about that? Excellent. Excellent.
Thank you. Thank you, Judge. Thank you.
Well, my friends, this is dynamite stuff and we will run it all past uh Larry Johnson if you're watching us live in
two hours and six minutes at 2 this afternoon and we'll run it past the great Phil Geraldi who has much to talk
to us about at 3:00 today. Judge Lalano for judging freedom.
Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom
Streamed live 2 hours ago
Transcript
Undeclared wars are commonplace.
Tragically, our government engages in preemptive war, otherwise known as aggression, with no complaints, from the
American people. Sadly, we have become accustomed to living with the illegitimate use of force by government.
To develop a truly free society, the issue of initiating force must be understood and rejected.
What if sometimes to love your country you had to alter or abolish the government? What if Jefferson was right?
What if that government is best which governs least?
What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong? What if it is better to perish fighting for freedom
than to live as a slave? What if freedom's greatest hour of danger is now?
1 minuteHi everyone, Judge Andrew Npalitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Wednesday, June 3rd, 2026. Our dear, intrepid
friend Pepe Escobar joins us now. Pepe, thank you very much for your time as always.
Greetings from Moscow, judge. Very important. Yes, I know you're in Moscow and you will soon be in St. Petersburg, which I understand was was attacked by
drones today and you and I have a lot of friends there. I trust that everybody is okay.
Uh I saw a comment from Dimmitri Peskov indicating that nobody was hurt. Of course, the government wasn't happy, but
nobody was hurt. But let's get right to our topic. Just a second, uh judge. It's important. Uh this is in the outskirts of St.
Petersburg and slightly far away from the airport. So, it's not inside the city.
Got it. Got it. Um, let's get right to the topic at hand
uh from you and Larry. Larry is on shortly after you in about two and a half hours uh from now. The two of you
have opined to me and others that you have sources which have informed you
that Iran has a nuclear device, a deliberable nuclear device. Is that true? What do they have and how do you know it?
Well, first of all, uh we revealed that I would say the soft launch of a new uh
platform called Powers Shift. Uh Larry and I are involved in this project. Uh
it's about deep info, deep intel, deep analysis, and we hope that it's going to
work. And of course we would like to invite uh many of our mutual friends in the weeks ahead to be part of it as
well. Well the information is absolutely surefire judge and I was very skeptical
from the beginning. I asked our Pakistani uh connection to can you grill
this guy again and again and again and at the end we got a definitive answer.
Look, uh, if I didn't want you to break the story, I wouldn't never have given it to you. Well, very very important the
context. Uh, I I I think I sent you judge uh the column that I published I think two two or three days ago, which
is more or less the background that led to what happened last week. And the most important thing that last that happened
last week was a phone call on May 28th.
That was uh last Thursday between uh Iranian President Pzashkin and the Pakistani Prime Minister Shabbaz
Sharif. So why did this happen? because Pakistan as our audience knows very well
they are the sole mediator towards a possible memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran. So we had this
phone call Thursday last week and this is what our sources revealed to us and this this is the bombshell in itself.
Pzashkin to Sharif over the phone directly. He delivered a very well ststructured
three-step sort of ultimatum that he said to Sharif should be uh
communicated to the White House immediately. Number one, which is something that the Iranians have been uh
insisting on for the past few weeks, no nuclear talks. That's it. Unless we go to stage number one, end of our wars.
Stage numbers number number two, we start discussing straight news. Then we have nuclear talks.
Number point number two, no more prospective nuclear treaty framework.
These were the words that our source uh meaning nothing like the JCPOA.
Exactly. Not even getting towards a JCPOA which considering the circumstances the best the Trump
administration can get now is a sort of diluted JCPOA. And the Iranians are saying no not even that because first
you need to go to stage one and two end of all wars and then we start discussing horm without that we discuss nothing
and then the number three which is at the heart of what we revealed on Monday and of course there's a lot of
controversy more than expected everywhere. Pesashkin said, "If American threats persist,
we can go for the detonation of a nuclear device on Iranian soil without specifying.
Is this a bomb that Iran already has? Is this a bomb that Iran only Iran
developed? Is this a bomb that they could count on Russian input to develop or it was delivered readym made let's
put it this way by Pakistan or by North Korea nothing uh the source did not elaborate
on that he was elaborating on what Pzashkin actually told Sharif so this
detonation would happen in in the words of Pzashkin translated via uh by our
source executed not as an act of war but as an irreversible ible sovereign
demonstration of capability to control scalation dominance.
o my first interpretation judge when when I get this and I start asking questions until we got the final answer
from the okay this is it it's more than reconfirmed otherwise I wouldn't even bother to give this information to you
guys if was telling sharif all of the above this means that he was cleared by
ayatahaba kame so this means this is a mustaba directive if this if the
Americans go over every possible red line which is uh happening as we speak. There will be a
demonstration. There will be no more nuclear ambiguity and they will have an undeniable demonstration and obviously
we can imagine the consequences for the global non-puriphilation system. What's going to be right? So this is it. So
it's extremely nuanced and very very important judge and I'm breaking this to you now ahead of everybody else. I am
waiting for a response whatever that is from somebody
very very close to Moshaba Kame. This was organized via our friends of the
cradle. I am the lead international columnist whatever for the cradle in Beirut. So I sent them my article, my
new article which is already written uh containing everything that I explained to you a few minutes ago. So this is
getting to u in front of this guy who is very very close to the supreme leader and we are waiting for a response. Uh they said that it might happen tonight.
So tomorrow we're going to have a response total denial plausible deniability whatever. But if whatever he responds,
we plan to publish the column because I tell the whole timeline, everything that happened last week, what led to uh this
uh phone call between Pzashkin and Sharif, and then what happened afterwards, which was uh foreign minister Dar
telling the whole story to Marco Rubio in person one day after that at the uh in question.
So this is where did the uh Iranians acquire uh a nuclear device?
Well, this is we already have uh a story that might shed light on what h has been
happening for the past few decades. In fact, judge and of course with Pakistani help. Uh we would like to tell the story next week, Larry and myself once again.
Well, we're going to have to go through this intelligence carefully. Uh get confirmation and then we can reveal next
week. But well, do you do you have do you have a gut feeling or an instinct? Did they develop it on their own or did someone
sell it or bring it to them in which case there's a a limited number of sources? All all all scenarios are
possible a judge first of all because this is so sensitive that nobody will ever confirm anything on the record
about what really took place. So this is the first time that we have
perhaps an indirect a direct indirect confirmation via the president of Iran in a phone
call with the prime minister of Pakistan that they are able to detonate a nuclear device without specifics of course and
of course I'm not expecting this gentleman very close to leader Moshaba Came to spill the beams about it.
Right. Right.
So there's going to be a lot of guess work. Okay. How did they obtain that?
Was that indigenous scientific proess by Iranian uh physicists and engineer?
Quite possible because they are extremely capable. Number one. Number two, did they have outside help? There are three major candidates for that.
Russia, Pakistan, North Korea. North Korea is a very very good candidate. In
my previous travels to Thran in the 2010s, I was always bumping into North Korean
delegations. Very very interesting. But they would never talk to us because they don't talk to foreigners. They were always huddle in their group, but they
would never talk to anybody. So there were a high level North Korean delegations in all the time. So th this might have involved a nuclear
cooperation as well. and the Pakistani story. We hope to at least tell the story next week of how Pakistan have
been collaborating with the Iranian nuclear program for the past few decades in fact. So all options are plausible.
Wow.
Do the CIA, MI6 and Mossad know what you have just
revealed to us? They obviously know it because you're saying it in public, but did they know about this beforehand?
We would have to ask and obviously there'll be plausible deniability everywhere. But uh in the story that we
plan to talk about next week, uh Larry, there is a Mossad component and there is an Indian component as well. The RW
uh Indian Intel apparatus. They were aware that was very close nuclear collaboration between Pakistan and
Russian and Mossad also knew. Mossad had to know. Yeah.
Does Russian intel does Chinese intel know about this?
I I can it's it's too early to tell judge uh Russia maybe I'll have a chance tomorrow in St. Petersburg or on Friday
to talk to some of my connections. Uh in fact I will present this directly to them. I say okay how do you read this
China well for for and it's and it's a pity because this thing broke when I was leaving China. I left Shanghai this
weekend. I was in Shanghai until Saturday in fact and we learned the final contours of the story when Larry
and I were talking about it on Monday only through the weekend. So this is something that will have to return to China and and obviously China won't this
this is for them this is a ultra matter of national security but there's an extra element that is very very
interesting that happened between yesterday and today judge guess who is the special envoy of the government in
Thran for high level Iran China relations Galibbath and Galibah.
That's the speaker of the parliament.
The speaker of the parliament. This is an extra role for Galibbah. Very, very close strategic partnership. Iran, China.
Do and foreign minister Arachi get along? Yes, they do.
The Americans are spreading words that these guys are antagonistic.
Now, both presidentkin is resigning and they don't know who to talk to. So sorry J this is total first of all
because they are uh in the political sphere together uh in the parliament and in the foreign
ministry uh the the only difference is that Galibav has an IRGC background but
and not Arai it doesn't matter now because now let's say the political factors and the military factors in tan
they merge And something that is absolutely impossible for people in Washington to understand
the aglutinator is Moshaba under ultraheavy protection. Of course,
he has to be. But he's he may he is wounded. There's no question about that.
But he's very very sharp and he's coordinating everything. So he has personal meetings with all of the above
from the foreign ministry to of course Galibah who's very close to him as well and the top ARGC leadership.
Let me ask you what uh John Mirshimer raised and that is is there more than
one nuclear device because if they only have one are they going to waste it on a demonstration in the desert? Uh that's a that's another thing that we don't know.
Nobody knows and obviously we will have a confirmation from anybody not to mention from Iraq. So they might have a
few quite quite possible if they had only one they would never waste it on a demonstration and and the way and this
is very important judge uh if you analyze the words at least the words
that we assume were used by possession in Farsy that's complicated because this
is Farsy translated to English and probably Farsy translated to Udo translated to English so we hope this is
not lost in translation but anyway he said that if American provocations go beyond all the current thresholds
they will consider um this demonstr this nuclear demonstration as a test as a symbol of
sovereignty so I'm I'm already imagining what uh the man that uh we we are in
touch with close to MTA what's going to be his response probably is going to be plausible deniability.
If you're if everything you're saying is accurate, this is a basis in the minds of
Netanyahu and his cohorts and Trump and his for the attacks in June and February, is it not?
Could be. Could be. Uh but then you have to interpret in reverse.
I doubt I I doubt if they had any um evidence three months ago that Iran was
on the brink of detonating a nuclear weapon.
They don't have that kind of intelligence with the top IRGC. They don't.
Well, very important. So if there is plausible deniability, which is probably going to be uh the likely response,
we're going to hear something along the lines of uh yes, uh leader Moraba Kam is
reviewing the nuclear posture since the first fatwa by Kmeni and the second fatwa by Kame.
And this now is on the table because now we are in the middle of an existential threat
is already it's already discussed openly in uh Iran judge that Iran will have to revise his nuclear posture.
Is the fatwa issued by his father still the law of the land number one. Yes. Is he able to supersede that fatwa?
Well, as supreme leader now, he has the institutional authority to do that.
That's very very important. Of course, he's going to have to explain this in I would say infinitismal detail because
this is at the heart of Shiite theology according to which a nuclear bomb is unislamic because it kills civilians deliberately.
o he would have to frame it in a theological political way which is a very complex as
exercise to explain the change. But now there is a widespread popular consensus
in Iran that they need something like this otherwise these provocations will continue add infinitum and that's what's
changed. Let me uh switch gears for a minute before we uh conclude.
Um Axios reported of course on President Trump using very harsh, even vulgar language toward uh Prime Minister Netanyahu. I'm sure you've seen this.
Yeah, sure.
The president said to Netanyahu, "You're effing crazy." Trump fumes at Netanyahu in call on Lebanon. Uh you'd be in
prison if it weren't for me. I'm saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.
Netanyahu basically said, I had a conversation with the president uh and it's not going to change what we're doing. This position of ours remains
unchanged. The IDF will continue to operate as planned in southern Lebanon.
So, first question, was this real or was it performative?
Uh well it looks like a very uh stage style or WWF kind of thing
completely but uh the main that would be that Trump is bringing to the front lawn of the White House.
You bet. It's like a cage match in front of the White House which I cannot think of anything more bad taste than that but
that's another story. uh he's not exactly a an aesthetic model or a cultural model, right? But anyway, he he
confirmed it himself. Uh judge, if I'm not mistaken, I think I saw it on NBC or whatever a few hours said was true.
We'll run the confirmation, Chris. I think it's number six.
You were angry with him. You said, "Are you effing crazy? What are you effing doing?" Um uh I helped you stay out of
jail. Is that true? Did you speak to him in those terms?
I did. I I wouldn't say angry. I was a little bit perturbed at his uh
constantly fighting with Lebanon. You know, at some point I said maybe we got to stop this. We got to stop it.
Oh gosh. And and this is very serious just because what's happening southern Lebanon is Gaza 2.0 zero in a smaller scale, but it's exactly the same thing.
Wow.
Destruction of whole villages and civilian populations. When I was in
Lebanon last year, I saw what Israel did uh uh during the fake ceasefire.
They destroy everything inside. I visited two villages on the border, different parts of the border, and they
were completely destroyed. And this is exactly what they're doing again.
Wow. All right, Pepe, I have to let you go. This is all dynamite. Uh Larry is watching us now because he knows that he
and I will be discussing the same thing in in two hours.
Uh and if this uh matures into anything beyond what we've talked about, Chris will find you. Safe travels. Thank you.
Russia, my dear man. Tomorrow is another story, Judge.
tomorrow. Uh there's going to be a lot of discussion about what what's going to happen to Ukraine afterwards.
All right. You uh you you let you let us know. You'll be with uh Ritter.
Uh if I hope so. We have to if you can find Ritter and Chris can find the two of you and the internet works. We'll do a show together.
We could ask the bar Scott Ritter what's going to happen in Ukraine. How about that? Excellent. Excellent.
Thank you. Thank you, Judge. Thank you.
Well, my friends, this is dynamite stuff and we will run it all past uh Larry Johnson if you're watching us live in
two hours and six minutes at 2 this afternoon and we'll run it past the great Phil Geraldi who has much to talk
to us about at 3:00 today. Judge Lalano for judging freedom.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 41051
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am
Re: PART 3 ANTI-ANTI-NAZI BARBARIAN HORDES ARE KNOCKING DOWN
by admin » Wed Jun 03, 2026 7:14 pm
End of 'tit-for-tat' era: Iran’s broad, asymmetric response to US attacks redraws deterrence equation
By Press TV Strategic Analysis Desk
Wednesday, 03 June 2026 3:16 PM [ Last Update: Wednesday, 03 June 2026 3:16 PM ]
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/0 ... e-equation
For far too long, a grim and predictable choreography governed the US shadow war in the Persian Gulf: an act of American provocation, a measured Iranian response, and an escalation contained by unspoken rules.
That era has now effectively ended, and Wednesday's events in the strategic waterway drove the point home with unmistakable clarity.
After the US Navy targeted an Iranian oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz and struck a communications tower on Qeshm Island in the early hours of Wednesday, the response from the Iranian armed forces defied all expectations.
It was broader, faster, and strategically asymmetric – firing not just at the vessel involved in the aggression but simultaneously hammering hostile targets across five allied countries. This was no mere retaliation but a fundamental reset of the operational equation.
Iran's message, delivered with unmistakable clarity, is that the old "tit-for-tat" or "run-and-run" paradigm has expired. The assumption that Tehran would sit idle or mirror the scale and location of any American provocation – a ship for a ship, a tower for a tower – has been permanently invalidated, tossed onto the ash heap of failed calculations.
This reflects a broader strategic signal that the Iranian armed forces stand fully prepared for any escalation scenario, while simultaneously reinforcing the cohesion and battle-readiness of the Axis of Resistance in confronting threats – from Iran to Lebanon.
Iran has now unveiled a new doctrine of qualitative asymmetry, under which the volume, type, and target of its response will no longer be chained to the enemy's original action. This shift is not a tactical adjustment but a strategic earthquake. By severing the reflexive link between aggression and response, Iran has thrown the US war machine's escalation calculus into complete disarray, as demonstrated on Wednesday.
Washington can no longer assume that a limited harassment will yield a limited response – or any response at all. The Iranian calculus now means any act of aggression from the enemy, however limited in scope, may trigger a response that knows no limits.
This is the operationalization of a core strategic principle: the removal of the option of military aggression from the enemy's table. By responding with overwhelming and unpredictable force, Iran is rendering the option of war profoundly unappealing.
When the enemy understands that a minor provocation could result in the simultaneous targeting of multiple allied sites, the cost-benefit analysis of aggression collapses into ruin.
Iran has fully demonstrated that it no longer fears crossing thresholds that once defined the brink of war. Having emerged victorious from the most unequal of wars, the Islamic Republic has internalized a grim, unshakable confidence: if war is imposed on it, it will fight with every ounce of its might. But more importantly, it has now proven it can deter decisively and emerge stronger on the other side.
Profound implications for any military adventurism
The implications for any future American miscalculation are nothing short of seismic. For months, conflicting signals emanated from within Iran – whispers that negotiation and compromise at any cost were the only paths to relief from sanctions. Such narratives fed a dangerous illusion in Washington that maximum pressure would eventually force Tehran to capitulate and accept American terms of the deal.
Wednesday's events effectively torched that illusion, reducing it to cinders. Iran demonstrated that decisive and swift resistance remains not just viable, but a fully valid and legitimate option. The choice is not between compromise or war, but between measured deterrence and catastrophic miscalculation.
By refusing to behave as a pressure-breakable state, Iran has forced the US military-industrial complex to rethink whether its harassment campaigns are worth the price.
Perhaps most critically, Iran has expanded the geographical canvas of its retaliatory actions. In response to an attack on a vessel's engine and a communications tower, Tehran did not limit itself to maritime targets. It struck land-based facilities in five countries allied with the United States – simultaneously, precisely, and without apology. The message is unmistakable: no point on enemy-aligned territory is safe anymore.
This represents a significant expansion of Iran's operational theater, a widening of the battlefield that Washington ignored at its peril. The old "vessel-for-vessel" policy had already evolved into "vessel-for-vessel plus point of origin of aggression." Now, it has transformed again, decisively and irrevocably: potential and actual points of aggression – anywhere in the region, anytime, without warning – are legitimate targets. And the list is extensible.
If unprovoked hostilities against Iran continue, locations deep inside the occupied territories could also be included on the potential target list.
This is not a threat of indiscriminate war but a sacrosanct promise of calibrated, strategic pain directed at every sanctuary from which the enemy operates. Every base, every allied capital, every logistical hub now lives under the shadow of Iranian military arithmetic.
For the Persian Gulf states hosting US military bases, the message is particularly chilling. Iran has long tolerated the presence of American soldiers on the soil of its neighbors, provided those arrangements were not directed against Iranian security.
Iran's decisive operation sent an unambiguous warning: as long as even one American soldier remains on your soil, and as long as American threats against Iran persist, your territory is not secure. Military agreements with third parties are respected only if they remain strictly neutral in Iran's confrontation with the American war machine. The moment they become launch pads for aggression, they become legitimate targets.
But Iran has gone a step further. It has linked economic security to military security in a single, terrifying equation. A new doctrine has been declared: "economy for economy and security for security." If the US continues its economic warfare against Iran, the economies of regional countries that partner with the enemy will also be threatened.
Iran is signaling, with absolute clarity, that it will no longer compartmentalize its responses. A US economic strike can and will be met with a response that directly disrupts the economic stability of America's regional allies. Their ports, their shipping lanes, their energy infrastructure, and their financial corridors are now variables in Iranian retaliation.
The days when Persian Gulf states could enjoy American security guarantees while passively – or actively – profiting from anti-Iran sanctions are over.
Iran is forcing them to internalize a stark, unforgiving choice: true neutrality, or shared vulnerability. There is no third option and no middle ground.
Axis of Resistance: From parallel warnings to unified field response
No analysis of Iran's firm posture is complete without understanding the synchronized choreography of the broader Axis of Resistance. To view Tehran in isolation is to miss the entire picture, and the same goes with Hezbollah and Yemen.
Just two days before Iran's response to US maritime aggression, the Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, the central command center of the Iranian armed forces, issued a strong warning to both the Zionist regime and the United States following threats of aggression against Beirut and its suburbs. That warning was no routine communiqué. In retrospect, it was the prelude to a coordinated, unified operation already set in motion.
The Axis of Resistance – Iran, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Ansarullah-led Yemeni armed forces, and other components – does not rush to exhaust all its tools. It deploys them strategically, layer by layer, with patience and precision. But with the continuation of Zionist crimes in Lebanon and the implicit cooperation of the governing authority there, the Axis has determined that the time for layered warnings has passed.
Other components, beyond Iran, are now entering the field to support Lebanon. This is not a symbolic gesture but a functional military alignment
The simultaneous statements by the commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Quds Force and the Yemeni armed forces laid out the new map of resistance. The warning was explicit, leaving no room for doubt: if Zionist aggression continues in Gaza and Lebanon, new options will be activated immediately, including control over the Bab al-Mandab Strait – one of the world's most critical chokepoints – alongside missile and drone responses from Yemen.
This is an open and unambiguous declaration of expanded geography, a gauntlet thrown at the feet of the enemy. The Axis has informed the enemy, in language it understands, that aggression against any part of this broad territory, from the Levant to the Arabian Peninsula, is considered an attack on the whole. The old divide between arenas has been erased, burned away by shared threat and unified purpose. A strike on Beirut can now trigger a blockade in the Red Sea. An attack on Dahiyeh can silence the Bab al-Mandab.
This coordinated warning also dismantles a dangerous enemy assumption, one that has guided Zionist strategy for years. The Zionist regime had apparently calculated that a threat to attack Beirut could be traded for the consolidation of occupation in southern Lebanon.
The thinking went, in its cold logic: offer a symbolic retreat from attacking Iran proper, and in exchange, maintain a permanent occupation of large southern areas. The Axis response has proven that assumption categorically false, smashing it to pieces. Neither the Lebanese resistance nor its Yemeni ally accepts such an equation.
There will be no deal that trades Beirut's safety for Lebanon's land. The only acceptable outcome is the end of aggression and the full cessation of occupation.
Perhaps the most immediate and telling effect of this unified posture has been on US decision-making, where paralysis has set in at the highest levels. Iran's recent warning alone was sufficient to push the country into paralysis.
Reports indicate that President Donald Trump rebuked and asked Benjamin Netanyahu not to carry out the planned attack on Beirut, fully aware of the consequences. That is the power of credible, coordinated deterrence – not firepower, but the fear of it, precisely calibrated.
Now, with other Axis components openly threatening field responses, including from Yemen, Trump's negotiating position regarding ending the war with Iran has weakened considerably. The US war machine can no longer pressure Iran in isolation while assuming the rest of the Axis will remain passive, watching from the sidelines.
Those days are gone. The unified front has transformed the regional balance of power, shifting the center of gravity away from Washington and toward the Axis.
By Press TV Strategic Analysis Desk
Wednesday, 03 June 2026 3:16 PM [ Last Update: Wednesday, 03 June 2026 3:16 PM ]
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/0 ... e-equation
For far too long, a grim and predictable choreography governed the US shadow war in the Persian Gulf: an act of American provocation, a measured Iranian response, and an escalation contained by unspoken rules.
That era has now effectively ended, and Wednesday's events in the strategic waterway drove the point home with unmistakable clarity.
After the US Navy targeted an Iranian oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz and struck a communications tower on Qeshm Island in the early hours of Wednesday, the response from the Iranian armed forces defied all expectations.
It was broader, faster, and strategically asymmetric – firing not just at the vessel involved in the aggression but simultaneously hammering hostile targets across five allied countries. This was no mere retaliation but a fundamental reset of the operational equation.
Iran's message, delivered with unmistakable clarity, is that the old "tit-for-tat" or "run-and-run" paradigm has expired. The assumption that Tehran would sit idle or mirror the scale and location of any American provocation – a ship for a ship, a tower for a tower – has been permanently invalidated, tossed onto the ash heap of failed calculations.
This reflects a broader strategic signal that the Iranian armed forces stand fully prepared for any escalation scenario, while simultaneously reinforcing the cohesion and battle-readiness of the Axis of Resistance in confronting threats – from Iran to Lebanon.
Iran has now unveiled a new doctrine of qualitative asymmetry, under which the volume, type, and target of its response will no longer be chained to the enemy's original action. This shift is not a tactical adjustment but a strategic earthquake. By severing the reflexive link between aggression and response, Iran has thrown the US war machine's escalation calculus into complete disarray, as demonstrated on Wednesday.
Washington can no longer assume that a limited harassment will yield a limited response – or any response at all. The Iranian calculus now means any act of aggression from the enemy, however limited in scope, may trigger a response that knows no limits.
This is the operationalization of a core strategic principle: the removal of the option of military aggression from the enemy's table. By responding with overwhelming and unpredictable force, Iran is rendering the option of war profoundly unappealing.
When the enemy understands that a minor provocation could result in the simultaneous targeting of multiple allied sites, the cost-benefit analysis of aggression collapses into ruin.
Iran has fully demonstrated that it no longer fears crossing thresholds that once defined the brink of war. Having emerged victorious from the most unequal of wars, the Islamic Republic has internalized a grim, unshakable confidence: if war is imposed on it, it will fight with every ounce of its might. But more importantly, it has now proven it can deter decisively and emerge stronger on the other side.
https://x.com/PressTV/status/2061465655434457303/photo/1
Press TV
@PressTV
Analysis: Israeli escalation in Lebanon and US adventurism in Persian Gulf test Iran's ceasefire red lines
By Press TV Strategic Analysis Desk
https://presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/01/76 ... e-redlines
9:11 AM · Jun 1, 2026
Profound implications for any military adventurism
The implications for any future American miscalculation are nothing short of seismic. For months, conflicting signals emanated from within Iran – whispers that negotiation and compromise at any cost were the only paths to relief from sanctions. Such narratives fed a dangerous illusion in Washington that maximum pressure would eventually force Tehran to capitulate and accept American terms of the deal.
Wednesday's events effectively torched that illusion, reducing it to cinders. Iran demonstrated that decisive and swift resistance remains not just viable, but a fully valid and legitimate option. The choice is not between compromise or war, but between measured deterrence and catastrophic miscalculation.
By refusing to behave as a pressure-breakable state, Iran has forced the US military-industrial complex to rethink whether its harassment campaigns are worth the price.
Perhaps most critically, Iran has expanded the geographical canvas of its retaliatory actions. In response to an attack on a vessel's engine and a communications tower, Tehran did not limit itself to maritime targets. It struck land-based facilities in five countries allied with the United States – simultaneously, precisely, and without apology. The message is unmistakable: no point on enemy-aligned territory is safe anymore.
This represents a significant expansion of Iran's operational theater, a widening of the battlefield that Washington ignored at its peril. The old "vessel-for-vessel" policy had already evolved into "vessel-for-vessel plus point of origin of aggression." Now, it has transformed again, decisively and irrevocably: potential and actual points of aggression – anywhere in the region, anytime, without warning – are legitimate targets. And the list is extensible.
If unprovoked hostilities against Iran continue, locations deep inside the occupied territories could also be included on the potential target list.
This is not a threat of indiscriminate war but a sacrosanct promise of calibrated, strategic pain directed at every sanctuary from which the enemy operates. Every base, every allied capital, every logistical hub now lives under the shadow of Iranian military arithmetic.
For the Persian Gulf states hosting US military bases, the message is particularly chilling. Iran has long tolerated the presence of American soldiers on the soil of its neighbors, provided those arrangements were not directed against Iranian security.
Iran's decisive operation sent an unambiguous warning: as long as even one American soldier remains on your soil, and as long as American threats against Iran persist, your territory is not secure. Military agreements with third parties are respected only if they remain strictly neutral in Iran's confrontation with the American war machine. The moment they become launch pads for aggression, they become legitimate targets.
But Iran has gone a step further. It has linked economic security to military security in a single, terrifying equation. A new doctrine has been declared: "economy for economy and security for security." If the US continues its economic warfare against Iran, the economies of regional countries that partner with the enemy will also be threatened.
Iran is signaling, with absolute clarity, that it will no longer compartmentalize its responses. A US economic strike can and will be met with a response that directly disrupts the economic stability of America's regional allies. Their ports, their shipping lanes, their energy infrastructure, and their financial corridors are now variables in Iranian retaliation.
The days when Persian Gulf states could enjoy American security guarantees while passively – or actively – profiting from anti-Iran sanctions are over.
Iran is forcing them to internalize a stark, unforgiving choice: true neutrality, or shared vulnerability. There is no third option and no middle ground.
https://t.co/S154GN9KYJ
Press TV
@PressTV
Analysis - Beirut retreat: Credible Iranian deterrence ends US-Israeli impunity to escalate unchecked
By Press TV Strategic Analysis Desk
From presstv.ir
9:40 AM · Jun 2, 2026
Axis of Resistance: From parallel warnings to unified field response
No analysis of Iran's firm posture is complete without understanding the synchronized choreography of the broader Axis of Resistance. To view Tehran in isolation is to miss the entire picture, and the same goes with Hezbollah and Yemen.
Just two days before Iran's response to US maritime aggression, the Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, the central command center of the Iranian armed forces, issued a strong warning to both the Zionist regime and the United States following threats of aggression against Beirut and its suburbs. That warning was no routine communiqué. In retrospect, it was the prelude to a coordinated, unified operation already set in motion.
The Axis of Resistance – Iran, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Ansarullah-led Yemeni armed forces, and other components – does not rush to exhaust all its tools. It deploys them strategically, layer by layer, with patience and precision. But with the continuation of Zionist crimes in Lebanon and the implicit cooperation of the governing authority there, the Axis has determined that the time for layered warnings has passed.
Other components, beyond Iran, are now entering the field to support Lebanon. This is not a symbolic gesture but a functional military alignment
The simultaneous statements by the commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Quds Force and the Yemeni armed forces laid out the new map of resistance. The warning was explicit, leaving no room for doubt: if Zionist aggression continues in Gaza and Lebanon, new options will be activated immediately, including control over the Bab al-Mandab Strait – one of the world's most critical chokepoints – alongside missile and drone responses from Yemen.
This is an open and unambiguous declaration of expanded geography, a gauntlet thrown at the feet of the enemy. The Axis has informed the enemy, in language it understands, that aggression against any part of this broad territory, from the Levant to the Arabian Peninsula, is considered an attack on the whole. The old divide between arenas has been erased, burned away by shared threat and unified purpose. A strike on Beirut can now trigger a blockade in the Red Sea. An attack on Dahiyeh can silence the Bab al-Mandab.
This coordinated warning also dismantles a dangerous enemy assumption, one that has guided Zionist strategy for years. The Zionist regime had apparently calculated that a threat to attack Beirut could be traded for the consolidation of occupation in southern Lebanon.
The thinking went, in its cold logic: offer a symbolic retreat from attacking Iran proper, and in exchange, maintain a permanent occupation of large southern areas. The Axis response has proven that assumption categorically false, smashing it to pieces. Neither the Lebanese resistance nor its Yemeni ally accepts such an equation.
There will be no deal that trades Beirut's safety for Lebanon's land. The only acceptable outcome is the end of aggression and the full cessation of occupation.
Perhaps the most immediate and telling effect of this unified posture has been on US decision-making, where paralysis has set in at the highest levels. Iran's recent warning alone was sufficient to push the country into paralysis.
Reports indicate that President Donald Trump rebuked and asked Benjamin Netanyahu not to carry out the planned attack on Beirut, fully aware of the consequences. That is the power of credible, coordinated deterrence – not firepower, but the fear of it, precisely calibrated.
Now, with other Axis components openly threatening field responses, including from Yemen, Trump's negotiating position regarding ending the war with Iran has weakened considerably. The US war machine can no longer pressure Iran in isolation while assuming the rest of the Axis will remain passive, watching from the sidelines.
Those days are gone. The unified front has transformed the regional balance of power, shifting the center of gravity away from Washington and toward the Axis.
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 41051
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am
Return to United States Government Crime
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests