Part 2 Anti-Anti-Nazi Barbarian Hordes are Knocking Down ...

[admin]

Trump Panics As Drone Scare Reported Near Air Force One Amid Iran War? US Secret Service Says…
Hindustan Times
Mar 30, 2026

drone scare near Air Force One triggered heightened security protocols in Palm Beach as Donald Trump was onboard. Flights were temporarily halted, helicopters deployed, and F-16 Fighting Falcon aircraft scrambled after restricted airspace was breached. While the United States Secret Service denied any credible threat, the incident has raised fresh concerns about airspace security, drone risks, and presidential protection measures amid rising tensions.



Transcript

Has the Iran war reached American soil with a mysterious drone scare unfolding dangerously near President Trump's plane? Just days after alarming reports
of Iranian drone threats targeting US territory, panic grips Florida's coastal communities. Did the chaotic emergency response in Florida expose critical
cracks in Trump's personal security apparatus under real pressure? F-fighters and helicopters scramble urgently over Palm Beach even as the
White House attempts to downplay the credible threat. A reported drone sighting near Air Force One initiated standard security protocols in Florida.
According to reports, the incident occurred near Palm Beach Airport on March th while President Donald Trump remained onboard the aircraft. A drone
reportedly maneuvered in close proximity to airport boundaries, necessitating an immediate suspension of ground operations for arriving and departing
flights. Authorities deployed helicopters to monitor and secure the surrounding airspace as a precautionary measure. per bulkhead seat reporting on
aviation communications. Passengers on a Delta Airlines flight received notifications that operations halted due to the nearby drone activity affecting
restricted airspace management. The US Secret Service contested this account when approached by Anidolo agency,
clarifying the sequence of events and response procedures.
Officials maintained helicopter operations followed pre-approved flight plans rather than constituting reaction to identified security vulnerabilities.
According to Secret Service statements,
Air Force One and the president faced no credible threats throughout the duration of airport activities. Separately, F-fighter jets intercepted a civilian
aircraft that penetrated temporary restricted airspace over Palm Beach during coordinated security operations.
The intruding aircraft received safe escort from the zone, accompanied by flare deployment, serving as standardized visual signaling to the pilot. Connection between this
interception and the preceding drone observation remains unestablished pending further operational reviews and assessments.
This episode follows recent FBI disclosures regarding Iranian aspirations to conduct drone operations targeting California infrastructure
sites. Police departments across the US West Coast have reportedly been placed on heightened alert as authorities brace for what they describe as a credible
threat linked to possible Iranian operations targeting American territory.
The FBI now believes Tehran could attempt to launch armed drones directly from a vessel stationed somewhere in the Pacific Ocean, a covert maritime
strategy designed to strike the US mainland while evading early detection systems.
The FBI alert as per sources to ABC News said, quote, "We recently acquired information that as of early February
Iran allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United States homeland,
specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran."
unquote. Intelligence analysts believe this may be part of Thran's larger plan of retaliation against both the United States and Israel following their
coordinated military assault that began on February th, an operation that fundamentally altered the balance of the conflict. The attacks on that day
claimed the life of Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kmeni, who was reportedly killed during the joint USIsraeli strikes, an event that sent political
shock waves through the region and beyond. Just days later, Kmeni's son,
Majaba, was declared his successor, and under his leadership, Iran has dramatically intensified its campaign of revenge, directing an unrelenting wave
of missile and drone strikes against enemy targets. Official reports indicate that Iran's latest missile launches have carried warheads weighing up to
kg, nearly double the to kg payloads it used earlier, signaling a clear effort to amplify destruction and
psychological impact. Meanwhile, the United States remains deeply concerned over the potential threat of Iranian sleeper cells said to be embedded on
American soil, raising fears of internal attacks time to coincide with ongoing overseas operations. President Trump has publicly stated that he is fully aware
of these Iranian sleeper networks operating inside the country. A revelation that has only heightened public anxiety as the war continues to
escalate on multiple fronts. President Trump, what have you heard about this bulletin that some law enforcement put out about a possible Iran revenge plot
in California where there would be some kind of a boat offshore launching drones towards the It's being investigated. But you have a
lot of things happening and all we can do is take them as they come. And the war itself is being prosecuted as well
as anybody has ever seen. And this is other countries telling me too. Big countries, powerful countries. They said they've never seen anything like it. And they also agree with what I'm doing.
They say it's it's an evil country and it's been for years that way.
And if they try to hit us back, have you been briefed about how many Iran sleeper cells there could be inside the US right now?
I have been. And a lot of people came in through Biden with his stupid open border. But we know where most of them are. We've got our eye on all of them. I
think if it doesn't they came in through the open border policies of sleepy Joe Biden, one of the
worst the worst president in the history of our country and we've got our eyes on all of them. But the war itself is being
prosecuted at a level that nobody's seen before. It's pretty it's pretty amazing to watch.
Intelligent sources have suggested that Iran may be preparing to employ a controversial Russian style tactic,
launching drones from off-ra cargo or oil ships positioned in international waters far beyond conventional surveillance zones. This alleged
strategy mirrors previous reports from when Russia was accused of striking European nations using a shadow fleet of disguised oil tankers that secretly
carried and deployed armed drones under civilian cover. Emerging intelligence briefings now indicate that Moscow could be extending direct support to Iran,
reportedly providing real-time reconnaissance data and targeting information to help [music] Iranian forces pinpoint and strike US military
positions across the Middle East. We are in constant contact with the Iranian side and with the Iranian leadership. As President Vladimir Putin has said,
Russia is always ready to do what it can to restore peace and stability in the region.

[admin]

Tehran Cancels Residency of 1,200 UAE Nationals
Caspian Post
30 Mar, 16:16
https://caspianpost.com/iran/tehran-can ... -nationals

On Monday, Iran's judiciary announced that it had revoked the residency permits of 1,200 United Arab Emirates nationals living in the country, ordering them to depart within seven days.

In an official statement, judicial authorities said the decision requires those affected to depart within a week, in what appears to be a reciprocal step following recent measures taken against Iranian nationals abroad, The Caspian Post reports, citing foreign media.

The move comes after reports that Emirati authorities had cancelled the residency visas of Iranian citizens, leaving some stranded outside the UAE without prior notice.

Observers suggest Tehran’s decision reflects a broader response to what it views as unfriendly actions by the UAE amid a rapidly deteriorating regional climate. The current escalation began after joint United States and Israeli strikes on Iran in late February, prompting Tehran to launch retaliatory missile and drone operations targeting strategic sites across the region.

While Iranian officials have not disclosed detailed legal grounds for the decision, the timing highlights the growing diplomatic strain between the two countries, with tensions increasingly affecting civilian residents.

The development underscores how the ongoing crisis is extending beyond military confrontation, with wider humanitarian and diplomatic implications across the region.

[admin]

One Month into U.S.-Israeli War with Iran, Havoc With No End in Sight
28 Mar, 17:58
Caspian Post
https://caspianpost.com/iran/one-month- ... d-in-sight

As the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran approaches its one-month mark, the biggest flare-up in the Middle East in decades has caused widespread devastation across the region and severe shockwaves around the globe.

Despite reports of possible talks between Washington and Tehran to halt hostilities, no substantive progress toward peace has materialized, as continued strikes and a military buildup further diminish hopes for a swift de-escalation.

HEAVY TOLL

The war erupted on Feb. 28 with U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Tehran and several other Iranian cities. Since then, the attacks have continued, targeting key Iranian military command centers, missile installations, energy infrastructures and nuclear facilities.

In response, Iran has launched over 80 waves of missile and drone strikes against Israel and U.S. military facilities across the Middle East, including those in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

The conflict has resulted in heavy casualties, with Iranian deaths estimated at over 1,900 and more than 24,800 injured, including the confirmed deaths of then Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, top security official Ali Larijani, and Intelligence Minister Esmaeil Khatib. Israeli and U.S. forces have also suffered losses, with at least 19 Israeli and 13 U.S. military fatalities reported.

Meanwhile, several other countries have been hit by projectiles, suffering casualties. The Gulf's status as a bastion of peace and prosperity is in doubt. Critical energy infrastructure across the region has been attacked, with residents fleeing to safe havens in Southeast Asia and Europe and the lives of millions upended.

In the Levant, Hezbollah fired rockets into Israel on March 2 in a show of support for Iran, prompting Israeli airstrikes and a ground incursion into Lebanon that has reportedly killed 1,116 people and displaced over a million.

In a major escalation, Iran has effectively blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, allowing only ships it considers non-hostile to pass. This maritime squeeze, along with damage to regional energy facilities, has pushed oil prices higher, keeping Brent Crude above 100 U.S. dollars a barrel and up more than 50 percent since the war began.

According to a recent World Trade Organization report, sustained high energy prices could reduce projected global GDP growth in 2026 by 0.3 percentage points.

NO CLEAR EXIT

Israel's Channel 12 reported Tuesday that Washington has delivered to Iran a 15-point plan for a month-long ceasefire deal. Tehran, however, considers it too "excessive and disconnected from realities," Iran's state-run Press TV reported Wednesday.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced Friday that Israeli strikes on Iran "will intensify and expand to additional targets."

Regional experts believe that while mounting regional and global pressure against the war could pave the way for a fragile, short-term ceasefire, a true end to the fighting remains a long way off, and the conflict risks dragging on with no real political settlement in sight.

"The most likely short-term scenario is a limited ceasefire driven by international pressure and repositioning," said Naji Ajeeb, a Sudanese conflict researcher. "Such a pause would be a tactical truce, allowing both sides to assess gains and prepare for further confrontation rather than achieving a comprehensive settlement."

Kamel Mansari, editor-in-chief of Le Jeune Independant, a French-language daily newspaper in Algeria, argues that the conflict could easily escalate into a prolonged war of attrition.

"A cessation of hostilities would require each side to claim a symbolic 'victory,' which is not currently the case," Mansari said. "If the United States and Israel do not cease their attacks against Iran, the conflict could escalate into a protracted asymmetric war."[/b]

In that case, regional players are likely to rely on indirect tools, including proxy attacks, limited strikes and cyber warfare, said Brigadier Pilot Adel Abdelkafi, security advisor to the Libyan High Council of State.

So far, Israel has shown the least interest in ending the war, with officials repeatedly opposing any potential ceasefire and signaling plans to escalate military operations.

Israeli political analyst Jonathan Lis observes that U.S. President Donald Trump's push for a swift deal with Iran is heightening Israeli concerns over potential U.S. compromises.

Israeli officials fear that the United States could show flexibility on critical issues, including Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium, restrictions on its nuclear program, and limitations on its ballistic missile capabilities, Lis said.

TEST FOR GLOBAL ORDER

Pointing to what they see as the United States and Israel's disregard for international law in their heavy-handed strikes on Iran, analysts warn that the war is ratcheting up regional tensions and eroding the world order.

Batu Coskun, an Ankara-based independent political analyst, cautions that the war risks intensifying regional polarization into long-term bloc politics. "Even if active fighting subsides, unresolved grievances and shifting alliances are likely to sow the seeds for future conflicts," Coskun said.

"Selective adherence to international norms undermines institutional credibility and may encourage similar behavior elsewhere," he said.

Mostafa Amin, an Egyptian researcher on Arab and international affairs, said the war is causing a crisis in the international system as unilateral actions undermine the UN-based global order.

"The broader international system faces a profound crisis as the United States increasingly sidelines the UN-based post-World War II global governance framework to facilitate its regional objectives," Amin said. "This encourages a transition toward a multipolar disorder where the pursuit of narrow, short-sighted interests dominates over international law."

As the war rages on, there may be a glimmer of hope.

"Calls for peace, particularly from countries like China, are significant in de-escalating tensions and encouraging dialogue among the parties involved," said Ayman Yousef, a professor of political science at the Arab American University in the West Bank.

But achieving lasting peace will require more countries to join a collective effort to an international order rooted in multilateralism and coexistence, Yousef noted.

"Ultimately, achieving stability requires a collective international approach that prioritizes dialogue, respects international frameworks, and works toward long-term political solutions rather than short-term military gains," Yousef said.

[admin]

International law is on Iran’s side – so why is the UNSC blaming the victim? As US-Israeli strikes intensify, Tehran insists it is fighting a lawful defensive war. Reprisals and third-state complicity are now shaping a parallel legal front.
by Aidan J. Simardone
The Cradle
MAR 26, 2026
https://thecradle.co/articles/internati ... the-victim

[x]
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Iran is under attack. Just as diplomatic progress appeared possible on Iran’s so-called nuclear program, the US and Israel launched airstrikes on 28 February, killing Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and massacring at least 165 schoolgirls. As Washington and Tel Aviv continue bombing hospitals, schools, and civilian infrastructure, the death toll has climbed beyond 1,900.

Even accepting western allegations against Iran, there is no clear legal basis for the US‑Israeli campaign. Claims of “protecting Iranians” and “pre‑emptive self‑defense” are not recognized grounds for the use of force under the UN Charter or customary international law. Yet at the UN Security Council (UNSC), condemnation was directed not at Washington or Tel Aviv, but at Tehran – particularly for retaliatory strikes across the Persian Gulf.

Iran argues it has acted within international law. Its strikes have focused on military installations and infrastructure tied directly to the war effort. Officials frame the campaign as one of survival rather than punishment. In Tehran’s telling, the primary violations lie with those who initiated the aggression against the Islamic Republic.

The use and abuse of International law

International law is far from perfect. Its modern architecture took shape alongside imperial expansion and has often reflected prevailing power hierarchies. Enforcement remains selective, while legal interpretations are frequently shaped by geopolitical influence. Yet even this imperfect system imposes constraints. It provides a framework intended to limit escalation and shield civilian populations from the worst excesses of war.

Under the UN Charter, force is permitted in only two circumstances: self‑defense following an armed attack, or explicit authorization by the Security Council. Article 51 affirms the inherent right of individual or collective self‑defense if an armed attack occurs:

“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations.”

Articles 39 and 42 empower the Council to authorize military action to restore international peace and security:

“Article 39 – The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.”

“Article 42 – Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.”

Neither Israel nor the US was attacked by Iran prior to launching their strikes. Nor did they obtain UNSC authorization.

Instead, alternative legal narratives had been advanced. One centers on regime change framed through the doctrine of the “responsibility to protect” (R2P), invoked in cases involving genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.

However, R2P has not crystallized into binding customary law. Critics argue its ambiguity risks lowering the threshold for intervention by allowing powerful states to repackage strategic objectives as humanitarian imperatives.

As per Jason Athanasios Doukakis for the Yale Review of International Studies, R2P “Does not possess the status of a legal obligation due to its vague definition and scope, lack of a prescribed mechanism through which to delegate authority, and unspecified framework of implementation.”

Using the R2P to justify attacking Iran is even more absurd, given Tel Aviv and Washington’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and attacks against Iranian civilians.

A second justification is the doctrine of pre‑emptive self‑defense – the claim that force may be used to prevent an imminent attack. Even the US realized the absurdity of this argument during the Iraq War, instead making convoluted arguments that UNSC authorization during the Gulf War allowed the use of force to stop Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. Not even that argument is available today.

Article 51 refers explicitly to an armed attack that has already occurred. Expanding the doctrine to include anticipated threats would weaken one of the Charter’s central restraints on unilateral force.

Measured and proportionate response

Not only is the war itself illegal under international law, but so is its conduct. Under international law, self-defense must be proportionate (in response to an attack) and necessary (furthering objectives to prevent future attacks). Otherwise, a small border skirmish could become nuclear.

Proportionality and necessity are part of customary international law, a legal source that comes from the consistent practice of states over a long period of time.

It has been affirmed in international legal cases such as ‘Nicaragua v. United States of America,’ where the International Court of Justice (ICJ) stated there was a “specific rule whereby self-defense would warrant only measures which are proportional to the armed attack and necessary to respond to it, a rule well established in customary international law.”

On the first day of the war, the US and Israel assassinated Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and bombed a girls’ elementary school, killing at least 180, of whom 165 were little girls. In no way does this achieve any military objective. In fact, by assassinating Khamenei and killing innocent civilians, the aggressors made negotiation more difficult.

Meanwhile, despite Iran launching thousands of missiles and drones in retaliation, officially, only 16 Israelis, 13 US soldiers, and 20 people across the Gulf have been killed. Iran’s main targets have been military bases and buildings hosting US soldiers – legitimate targets given their role in attacking the Islamic Republic. Iran has also struck embassies, not with the goal of assassinating diplomats, but to destroy spying operations.

Most controversial has been the attack against a desalination plant in Bahrain, which provides water. As per Article 52(1) of the Additional Protocol of the Geneva Convention, “Civilian objects shall not be the object of attack or of reprisals.” Specifically, Article 54 states, “It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population.”

Iran argues it was responding with tit-for-tat to the destruction of a desalination plant on Qeshm Island, the only one providing water to the 150,000 residents, while Bahrain possesses multiple facilities capable of maintaining supply.

Within the law of armed conflict, such actions are sometimes analyzed through the doctrine of belligerent reprisals – a narrowly defined concept referring to measures that would normally be unlawful but may become permissible as a last‑resort response to a serious prior violation.

Customary interpretations stress that reprisals must remain proportionate, must aim solely at compelling the opposing party to return to lawful conduct, and must be employed only after other avenues of redress have failed. Tehran frames the strike on Bahraini infrastructure as a coercive signal intended to deter further unlawful attacks on indispensable civilian facilities inside Iran.

Supporters of this position argue that when international institutions fail to prevent violations, limited reprisals may function as one of the few available enforcement mechanisms through which states facing militarily superior adversaries can impose costs and restore a degree of legal reciprocity.

Lies at the UNSC

This interpretation has found little traction at the UNSC. With the US wielding veto power as a permanent member, any resolution condemning American actions was unlikely to pass. Instead, Iran was blamed for escalating the war.

Resolution 2817 affirms the territorial integrity and political independence of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Jordan, while reiterating their right to self‑defense – despite their role in hosting foreign military bases used in operations against Iran.

There is no evidence Iran has deliberately targeted any civilian infrastructure (with the exception of Bahrain’s desalination plants to deter attacks against Iran’s plants). Even including military personnel, the total death toll from Iran’s attacks is under 50. Among the few civilians who were killed, many were struck by falling debris from intercepted missiles. It is not Iran that strikes hospitals, schools, and innocent civilians. It is Israel and the US.

Tehran and its allies point to UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 3314 (1974), which defines aggression to include situations in which a state allows its territory to be used by another state to launch attacks against a third country. Article 3(f) identifies the provision of airspace, bases, or logistical platforms for military action as conduct that may itself constitute aggression.

From this perspective, states that facilitate such operations risk losing neutral status and may become subject to proportionate defensive measures aimed at halting ongoing attacks.

Resolution 3314 has informed subsequent legal developments, including jurisprudence at the ICJ and the Kampala Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which expanded the possibility of individual criminal liability for leaders involved in planning, facilitating, or supporting acts of aggression.

The recent resolution also condemns Iran’s selective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran counters that wartime blockades are recognized under customary maritime law if declared and effectively enforced. It further notes that the strait lies partly within Iranian and Omani territorial waters.

Perhaps what the Resolution was actually alluding to was the right of innocent passage, which allows for non-military ships to pass through territorial waters. This right is part of customary international law, but is codified in Article 17 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

However, the San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea provides further details on existing customary international law. Articles 93 to 108 permit blockades as they are declared (Article 93) and effective (Article 95). As long as this is followed, Article 98 states that:

“Merchant vessels believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade may be captured. Merchant vessels which, after prior warning, clearly resist capture may be attacked.”

The closing of the Strait of Hormuz should be viewed not just as Iran applying pressure on the global economy, but as a blockade for goods coming to the Gulf states. Iran announced its blockade, and it is proving effective in weakening Gulf countries. Contrary to the Resolution, this action is compliant with international law.

China and Russia ultimately abstained, criticizing the resolution as unbalanced while seeking to preserve diplomatic and economic ties with Gulf partners.

Before it passed, Beijing and Moscow condemned the Resolution for being unbalanced and failing to call out the root cause of the conflict.

Another failure

The UNSC was formed after World War II with the goal of preventing conflict. Its recent Resolution has encouraged it, in failing to denounce the aggressors: America, Israel, and the countries hosting hostile military bases.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has similarly argued that international law is being applied selectively, pointing to western responses to Gaza and the Strait of Hormuz as evidence of what Tehran views as double standards in enforcement.

Even a vague statement condemning war – which Russia drafted but failed to pass – would have been better. Instead, the UNSC made matters worse by occluding the Gulf states’ role in bombing Iran and condemning Tehran for defending itself.

Iran maintains it has sought to limit civilian casualties and focus on targets directly linked to the war effort. If international law is applied selectively – shielding aggressors while condemning those who claim to defend themselves – its authority risks erosion.

For states facing existential threats, compliance with the laws of war may cease to appear a strategic choice and instead resemble a dangerous illusion.

[admin]

BOOM! ‘Safest’ U.S. Base Hit, Special Forces Aircraft INCINERATED In Fiery Rocket Strike | Watch
Times Of India
Mar 30, 2026 #Iran #iraq #iranuswar

In an attack that sent shockwaves across Iraq, an aircraft was set ablaze in a U.S. military base near Baghdad International Airport, according to an Al Jazeera report. The aircraft identified in the report as an Iraqi special forces plane was blown up in a rocket attack on Victory Base in the Iraqi capital. Multiple rockets reportedly hit the base on March 30, triggering a loud blast that was heard across the city. The Al Jazeera report claimed that the air defence system installed at the base was not able to intercept the incoming rockets, and it hit an A32B Iraqi transport plane.

[admin]

EXPLOSIVE! Nuclear Strike On Iran Loading? UN Insider Drops Bombshell War Plan, Quits
Times Of India
Mar 30, 2026 #UNShock #IranNuclearThreat #BreakingNews

A major controversy has erupted after Mohamad Safa resigned from his UN-linked role, claiming the United Nations may be preparing for a scenario involving nuclear weapons in Iran. His allegations, shared in a public letter, remain unverified and have drawn no official response. Safa accused senior UN figures of being influenced by a “powerful lobby” and warned of catastrophic consequences, particularly for densely populated Tehran. He says he resigned to expose the issue and prevent escalation. The episode highlights growing mistrust and deepening global tensions amid an already volatile conflict. Watch



Transcript

A dramatic and controversial claim is now adding a new layer of tension to the already volatile Middle East conflict. A
secondsUnited Nations linked diplomat has resigned, alleging that the international body may be preparing for
secondsa scenario involving the possible use of nuclear weapons in Iran. The claim made by Muhammad Sappa has not been
secondsindependently verified and has not received any official response from the United Nations. Sappa served as the main
secondsrepresentative of the patriotic vision organization or PVA at the UN.
secondsThe organization holds special consultative status with the UN's economic and social council and Sappa
secondshimself has been associated with it for over a decade including serving as its executive director since
minute, secondsIn a public post announcing his resignation, Sappa shared a detailed letter outlining what he described as
minute, secondsdeeply concerning developments within the UN system. He claimed that certain senior figures inside the organization
minute, secondswere influenced by what he called a powerful lobby, accusing them of steering decisions in a direction that
minute, secondscould have catastrophic consequences. In his words, he warned that people do not fully understand the gravity of the
minutes, secondssituation, alleging that the UN is preparing for the possible use of nuclear weapons in Iran. Sappa also highlighted the potential human cost,
minutes, secondspointing to the densely populated city of Thrron and urging the global community to consider the devastating
minutes, secondsimpact such a scenario could have on civilians.
minutes, secondsExplaining his decision, Sappa chose to resign after what he described as much reflection, stating that he could not
minutes, secondscontinue in his role if it meant being associated with what he called a potential crime against humanity. He
minutes, secondswent further, claiming that he had given up his diplomatic career in order to bring this information to light in what
minutes, secondshe described as an attempt to prevent a nuclear catastrophe before it is too late.
minutes, secondsSappa also issued a public appeal calling on people around the world to protest and raise awareness urging
minutes, secondscollective action to stop any possible escalation.
minutes, secondsIn his letter, he alleged that he had faced criticism, censorship, and even threats for expressing dissenting views.
minutes, secondsHe linked this pressure to his stance following the October Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent war,
minutes, secondsclaiming that he had been sidelined in diplomatic circles for raising concerns.
minutes, secondsAccording to Sappa, he had been considering stepping down since and had endured mounting pressure over the
minutes, secondspast years. Despite the seriousness of these allegations, the United Nations has not issued any official comment on
minutes, secondseither his resignation or the claims he has made. With no independent verification so far, the situation
minutes, secondsremains unclear. However, the episode underscores the growing mistrust,
minutes, secondscompeting narratives, and deepening divisions surrounding international institutions at a time when the conflict
minutes, secondsin West Asia continues to escalate. As tensions rise, claims like these,
minutes, secondsverified or not, are adding to the uncertainty and anxiety around what could be the next phase of this widening crisis.
minutes, secondsTensions along Israel's northern borders escalated sharply as Iran and Hezbollah launched coordinated missile attacks.
minutes, secondsSirens blared across Hifa, Natana, and surrounding towns, warning residents of incoming projectiles. Footage aired on
minutes, secondsIsraeli Channel shows towering flames engulfing the Bison oil refinery in Hifa following the strikes. Authorities are
minutes, secondsassessing whether the refinery was directly hit or struck by debris from intercepted missiles. Local medics and rescue teams rushed to the scene as
minutesimpacts were reported across northern Israel. So far, there have been no confirmed casualties, but authorities warn of ongoing risk as fires continue to burn.
minutes, secondsThe barrage followed a series of Hisbala rockets fired from Lebanon toward the Galilee and Hifa Bay region.
minutes, secondsSimultaneously, Iran launched ballistic missiles targeting northern Israel,
minutes, secondsunderscoring the coordinated nature of the attacks. Israeli defense forces are responding to the strikes while residents in coastal cities and nearby
minutes, secondstowns remain under high alert. Emergency services continue to monitor the situation, urging citizens to seek shelter and follow official instructions.
minutes, secondsThis latest attack marks a dangerous escalation in regional hostilities,
minutes, secondshighlighting the growing reach of Iran and its allied forces in Lebanon.
minutes, secondsTensions along Israel's borders have spiked dramatically as the country faces what appears to be a coordinated attack from multiple fronts.
minutes, secondsIn northern Israel, residents scrambled to shelters after sirens warned of a suspected drone infiltration. The Israel
minutes, secondsDefense Forces report that Hezbollah drones were detected swarming over border communities, triggering emergency
minutes, secondsprocedures. People were urged to take cover as authorities closely monitored the skies. At the same time, southern
minutes, secondsIsrael went on high alert as sirens blared across towns and cities. The IDF confirmed that Iran launched a ballistic
minutes, secondsmissile attack targeting southern communities. Most of the incoming missiles were successfully intercepted and so far there are no reports of
minutes, secondinjuries. The alert underscored the ongoing threat from Iran and the volatile security situation along Israel's borders.
minutes, secondsIn response, the IDF said it carried out strikes targeting Iranian regime positions in Tehran, signaling a swift
minutes, secondsretaliation. Officials stressed that Israel remains prepared to respond to any escalation, maintaining vigilance
minutes, secondsalong both its northern and southern frontiers.
minutes, secondsThe unfolding events mark one of the most intense periods of tension in the region. With Israel facing simultaneous
minutes, secondsthreats from Hezbollah drones in the north and Iranian missile fire in the south, the situation remains highly
minutes, secondsfluid and authorities continue to urge citizens to stay alert and follow safety instructions.
minutes, secondsNews never stops. The world keeps turning and every turn tells a story.
minutes, secondsWars, elections, geopolitics, Davids versus Goliaths. While everyone is celebrating the US China trade tour,
minutes, secondsTrump has been quietly doing something else across Asia.
minutes, secondsWere once home to the ancient Silk Road connecting east and west.
minutes, secondsBut who's connecting the dots? Who's decoding the global storm? Welcome to Times of India videos.
minutes, secondsYou're watching a special edition of Global Pulse with me, Niha Kana.
minutes, secondsWe decode the shifting grains of geopolitics to you. From Washington to Wuhan,
minutes, secondseverything all at once.
minutes, secondsJust two years ago, Canada was one of the most popular countries for Indian storms.
minutes, secondsFrom Davos to Delhi, we track the decisions that move markets, shift policies, and shape the future.
minutes, secondsNo jargon, no bias, just clear, credible global journalism. Because understanding
minutes, secondsthe world doesn't have to be complicated. It just has to be smart.
minutes, secondsAnd that's what we do best. At Times of India videos, we don't just tell stories, we build perspective. We connect the dots between what's global
minutes, secondsand what's personal. What's happening out there and what it means for you.
minutes, secondsIt's fast. It's fearless. It's making sense of the changing world order. Times
minutes, secondsof India videos because your world view is just a tap away.

[admin]

https://x.com/mhdksafa/status/2038190305950781695

Mohamad Safa
@mhdksafa

I don't think people understand the gravity of the situation as the UN is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use in Iran.

[x]

This is a picture of Tehran. For you uneducated, untraveled, never-served, warhawks licking your chops at the thought of bombing it. It's not some low population desert. There are families, children, family pets. Regular working class people with dreams. You're sick to want war.

Tehran is a city of nearly 10,000,000 people. Imagine nuking Washington, Berlin, Paris, London, or beyond, bombed with nuclear weapons.

I gave up my diplomatic career to leak this information. I suspended my duties so as not to be part of or a witness to this crime against humanity, in an attempt to prevent a nuclear winter before it is too late.

Yesterday, nearly ten million people protested “No Kings” in the United States. The possibility of the use of nuclear weapons must be taken very seriously. It's dangerous. Act now. Spread this message worldwide. Take the streets. Protest for our humanity and future. Only the people can stop it. History will remember us.

3:43 AM · Mar 29, 2026

https://x.com/mhdksafa/status/2037475557999280433

Mohamad Safa@mhdksafa

After much reflection, and after it became clear to me that some UN seniors are serving a powerful lobby and not the UN, I have decided to suspend all my duties as PVA Main Representative at the UN and from all UN committees/groups of which I am a member.

I cannot in good conscience be part of or witness to what is happening at a time when the UN is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use.

It has been an honor cooperating with the UN for nearly 12 years under different Secretaries-General and Human Rights Council Presidents, leading PVA delegation.

May God bless this world.

[x]

Mohamad Safa
@mhdksafa

We warned the world that Gaza is the testing ground for a lawless new world order.

What Israel is currently doing in southern Lebanon is clearly aimed at ethnic cleansing and colonization, using the same war crime tactics used in the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

Displaced over a million people. Wiping out entire villages. Control of the sea entrances in southern Lebanon. Separating the South from rest of Lebanon by bombing bridges and roads. Civilians can't flee. Ambulances cannot reach the wounded or the hospitals on the other side. Laying siege cruelly cut off all fuel from entering, with threats to bomb aid trucks and medical vehicles heading south. Power is out in hospitals and homes. Food is rotting. Water pumps stopped working. Entire communities are cut off from essential supplies.

Food, water, and medical supplies currently available in the south are sufficient for at least a month, after which we will see another Gaza in Lebanon.

They are literally repeating it all on Lebanon, with flagrant violations of international law and the international community remains silent.

[x]

Mohamad Safa
@mhdksafa
Israel just passed death penalty law for ~10,000 Palestinian prisoners.
[x]
This violates the Common Article 3 applies to all four Geneva Conventions, but international law clearly doesn't apply to Israel.
2:16 PM · Mar 30, 2026

Mohamad Safa
@mhdksafa

Israel must understand that they can’t turn on and off the ceasefire whenever they want under international law.
[x]
If Israel can turn the ceasefire on and off whenever it feels like bombing Gaza and Lebanon, it's not a ceasefire. It is: you cease, I fire.
11:29 AM · Mar 30, 2026

Mohamad Safa
@mhdksafa

Stop saying history will judge them, judge Israel now. With International Criminal Court judges.

5:54 AM · Mar 30, 2026

Mohamad Safa
@mhdksafa

As far as I know! People are betting on my head on X “twitter” and other platforms!

I am making it publicly known that I am not suicidal.

If I die under mysterious circumstances, it means they failed to stop me, so they killed me, and you know who is behind it.

11:13 AM · Mar 28, 2026

Mohamad Safa
@mhdksafa

I am tired of trying to prove to the world that Palestinians are humans too. They are blowing up entire residential blocks killing countless women and children.

The world needs to see what Israel did to children in Gaza on Eid al-Fitr. Don't stop talking about Gaza

[x]