Youtube videos

[admin]

WOW! Epstein Assistant DROPS BOMBSHELL Claims During TESTIMONY
by Katie Phang
May 22, 2026

Jeffrey Epstein’s long-time personal assistant and traveling companion, Sarah Kellen, provided some information to House Oversight yesterday, including what Rep. James Comer is claiming are the names of 3 “new” abusers. But, reporting suggests that those names aren’t new, so what else did Kellen say of value? Katie Phang has the details from that closed-door interview & analysis on the value of Kellen’s information.

[admin]

Lutnick Makes $5 Million Donation BEFORE Epstein TESTIMONY?!?
Legal AF
May 25, 2026

Popok reports on embattled Commerce Sec Howard Lutnick looking like he was greasing the skids and encouraging that only softball questions be thrown his way by the Republicans on the House Oversight Committee by making a well-timed $5 million personal donation to the House Republicans main Super PAC while he was negotiating to appear for testimony about his Epstein connections. And your jaw will hit the table when you see who Lutnick originally listed as his "Employer" and as his "Title" (hint: It's NOT Commerce Secretary!)

[admin]

Melania PANICS as Michael Wolff Prepares NEXT MOVE in LAWSUIT!!!
Legal AF
May 26, 2026

Popok explains that Michael Wolff, the journalist and chronicler of all things Epstein x Trump x Melania, can now either appeal to try to get Melania under oath in a deposition about where she really lives (i.e. in New York or at Mar a Lago), or can just file first in Florida before Melania does first, in an effort to avoid Judge Cannon presiding over any "Billion Dollar" defamation case between the two of them. Even the Trump appointed Fed Judge in NY that dismissed Michael's case, observed that she DID NOT rule on the merits of his claims that everything he has said or written about Melania and Epstein are true or his opinion that can't form the basis of a threatened libel suit.

[admin]

White House in TOTAL PANIC MODE As LEAKS GO PUBLIC!!!
Legal AF
Jun 12, 2026

Who in the White House Situation Room that devised the Epstein files coverup will be investigated by the House, and who will be impeached? Bondi, Patel, JD Vance, Susie Wiles, and/or Todd Blanche? The Legal AF podcast with Popok and Lisa Graves takes a look at the reported "freakout" leak and its ramifications.

[admin]

Epstein Lawyer EXPOSED as DAMAGE CONTROL BACKFIRES!!
Katie Phang
Jun 22, 2026

Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime friend and elite lawyer, Kathy Ruemmler, is trying to do reputation damage control in advance of her House Oversight interview by doing a fluff interview in the NY Times, where she claims she was used by Epstein. But the reality of the evidence publicly available suggests that she doth protest too much. Katie Phang brings the receipts and describes how this lack-of-apology tour isn’t helping Ruemmler.



Transcript

So, you folks know me and I'm not really quick to judge or criticize fellow
legal analysts or journalists uh for the stuff that they write. They're entitled
to investigate, research, and write what they want to write. But I do think in
the sphere of talking about Jeffrey Epstein, we have to take a little bit more of a critical eye in the way that
we report on Jeffrey Epstein. Um there is a lot of information yet obviously
not enough as as evidenced by the illegally redacted uh DOJ files here and the fact that the DOJ continues to sit
on 3 million plus documents. But when but when you're going to interview
a person who was intimately involved with Jeffrey Epstein despite their
protestations otherwise when emails and other communications as well as other media reporting corroborates that this
person had an incredibly intimate relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. I don't think I don't think it's enough to
just ask them why did you associate with Jeffrey Epstein? Why did you stay in his orbit? I don't think that that's enough.
I think you actually have to, especially if you are a fellow lawyer, I think you need to probe and I think you need to probe with evidence and even exhibits as
in I think you need to show the subject of the conversation certain emails and text messages that would
belly their assertions that they weren't close to Jeffrey Epstein at all, that it was just a
professional relationship. And the person I'm talking about, the subject of this piece or this article in the New
York Times from yesterday is a woman named Kathy Rumler.
And the person who wrote this piece in the New York Times is a former federal prosecutor by the name of An Kush
Kadori. Now an Kush I know and I am beyond disappointed in the fluff piece
that is an apology to no one by Kathy Rumler.
In fact, it is a New York Times and listen I'll say this. Ankush wrote an opinion guest essay for the New York
Times. And yet now I'm pissed off at the New York Times for allowing this apologist
email or excuse me piece to even be published. Because if Kathy wanted to be
able to speak directly to this, then then she should number one sit down with
somebody who's actually going to probe probe her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
3 minutesThis is not a probe. And then when Ankush Kadori ends his opinion guest essay
with the following paragraph, castigating Miss Rumler will not change the incentives that allowed Mr. Epstein
to evade prosecution for so long and it will not fix the deficiencies in federal law enforcement and the American legal system that ensure people like Mr. Epste
will always find a home. That, ladies and gentlemen, is absurd. Of course, we can castigate
Kathy Rumler. Why? Because she continues to evade responsibility
for the contributions she made to Jeffrey Epstein to allow him to try to put forward into a public-f
facing way some air of legitimacy and credibility.
And throughout this piece in the New York Times,
she continues to say that she had no idea. She says, "I kept up the relationship." Or she tells Ana,
she kept up the relationship with Jeffrey Epstein because of what he could offer, referrals, business, the rarified
professional network. She claims that these emails and text messages have been quoted without context.
And according to Anush Kadori, Kathy Rumler condemned Mr. Epstein repeatedly
and unequivocally, telling me at one point she was overwhelmed with anger and sadness over the harm he had wrought. She had, she
told me, been a victim of sexual assault herself. If I had seen or heard anything to suggest that Epstein was harming women or girls, I would have taken action to stop it, she insisted.
Now, Anne Kush does write. At times, though, she seemed oddly naive. She never knew, she told me, how serious and
extensive Mr. Epste's crimes were until she heard the prosecutors describe the charges against him in court in 2019.
She couldn't understand why so many people assumed she was complicit.
So, I'm just going to let that sit for a second with you.
She tells Ankush that she had no idea about the nature of the charges against Jeffrey Epstein until he was charged in
2019, as we know, by the Southern District of New York, federally charged and indicted.
And yet in this piece that Ankush says is the quote first in-depth interview since all
of this became public, she says to Ankush that she looked into
the case against him, meaning she looked into the 2008 prosecution in Florida against Jeffrey Epstein. She says she
reviewed the underlying procedural history and spoke with Epstein. Oh, I'm sure Jeffrey Epstein was such a reliable
narrator of what was going on in his sex trafficking international ring of children.
She said she was particularly persuaded by a 2008 letter written by one of Mr.
Epstein's lawyers. Again, not skewed in any way or biased, right? And she said
she knew that federal prosecutors in Miami were aggressive. Footnote. Yeah.
back then. Now, not so much against people unless you are a Trump opponent.
Rumbler assumed that these federal prosecutors in Miami had looked long and hard at the evidence against Epstein and that they eventually reached a very
lenient deal. So, she says, "Oh, then it could not have been that bad of a case." The fact that Epstein got extensive work release privileges just a few months
into his short sentence said to her, "Oh, that case was never really that strong." And then Epstein said that he had been meeting and socializing over the years
with a former federal prosecutor who had overseen the investigation and plea deal. So again, it suggested to her that the underlying case against Epstein had
been weak. All of that being said, she then tells Ankush what I told you a couple of minutes ago, which was, "But no matter what, I kept this relationship
with Epstein because it was purely professional. I got referrals, business, and access to a quote rarified
professional network." Okay, well let's get into the details because as I like to say here at Katy Fang News, the devil
is in the details and I want to make sure that we get into those. Now, when Jeffrey Epste was arrested in 2019, he called three people, okay?
One of the people he called, Marty Weinberg, was a criminal defense lawyer that he had known for years.
He called Darren Indk who we know has been a longtime attorney for Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, he's the co-executive
of Epstein's estate alongside Epste Epstein's longtime accountant, Richard Khan.
And then he called Kathy Rumler. He called her at 7:15 p.m. on her cell.
And this is when he was arrested. Okay. Now,
while on July 6, 2019, he's being arrested. At approximately ,
Jeffrey Epstein spontaneously told the FBI and other law enforcement, quote, "Is this sex trafficking?" And then
about a minute to s later says, quote, "Is this about underage?" Same date, July 6, 2019, after he tried
calling Marty Weinberg, whose name you're going to see again in just a minute. Darren Indk and Kathy Rumler.
Think about this. The feds have come for you. You're under arrest. You're being transported. You've been given the chance to be able to call somebody. Who
do you call? In my opinion, I would call my trusted advisors, and that would be
my lawyers, right? I'm under arrest by the feds. I am spontaneously uttering to law enforcement, "Is this sex
trafficking? Is this about underage? So, who am I going to call?" Marty Weinberg, Darren End, and Kathy Rumler. Same date, July 6th, 2019, a little bit after .
He says again, Epstein says, quote, "This is going back to 2002, 2005.
Oh, this is bad. This is really bad." So, if you're Jeffrey Epstein
and you know that something going on is quote really bad, you're going to call the people that you trust the most to
help you, right? And one of those people is Kathy Rumbler.
I find it hard to believe from everything that I have heard and read about Jeffrey Epstein that he would be such a not present
over-the-top large figure like larger than-l life figure in your life. And listen, let's be very clear. The emails and the texts and all the documents in
between Kathy Rumler and Jeffrey Epstein corroborate what I am saying. He had an outsized presence in her life.
And so now she's saying no, no, no, purely professional. Nothing nothing personal. never represented him. No, no, no, no, no. Okay, look. Here's a little bit inside baseball as a lawyer.
You don't need some formal engagement agreement for somebody to be your lawyer, right?
You don't. And and and it's amazing to me because Kathy Rumler could be Jeffrey Epste's lawyer when it kind of helped
her financially, right? When it helped her be able to garner Bill Gates as a client, right? But she's quick to say, "No, no, no. The firm, Laam Watkins,
myself, no, no. Jeffrey Epstein himself was never a client." Okay, I got it. Fine. Let's just run with that, Kathy.
Even though I I don't necessarily agree with you. Fine. So, given the fact that he calls her Kathy Rumler, you would
think, "Yeah, that professional relationship sounds pretty close." Well, look, Kathy Rumler, just as a reminder,
keeps on saying, "In 2014, quote, I barely knew Jeffrey Epstein." As in,
this is 5 years earlier than when he gets arrested. And she's like, "Back then, I barely knew him." She had just
left the Obama White House in the summer of 2014 and she was going back to her White Glove White Shoe International
Cajillion dollar law firm, Laam and Watkins.
And then this is what we learn that she goes back to Laam and Watkins.
However, before she even started her new job at Laam,
she received a phone message from a man she had never met. He wanted to set her up with Bill Gates to oversee legal work for a new investment fund that would
provide grants to specified charities over time.
But before long, the three of them were eating together at the Four Seasons Hotel in Manhattan. The middleman was Jeffrey Epstein.
So, let's say generously fall of 2014, she gets introduced to Jeffrey Epstein, who introduces her to Bill Gates.
So, now she's like, "Shit, I hit it big.
White whale of a client in Bill Gates." Let's just say for argument's sake, she
still has no idea what's going on. Visav Jeffrey Epstein. Well, after that
meeting, what happens? Jeffrey Epstein says, quote, "I have a Google history, and if you have any questions about that, I'm happy to talk to you about
it." And that's when she looks into that 2008 Florida prosecution into Jeffrey Epstein, which I have just told you she
claims just seemed to be such a throwaway [ __ ] case.
Okay, so let's keep going. Remember, generously I said fall of 2014, she
doesn't know Jeffrey, but he's landed her this white whale of a client, Bill Gates, which is going to bring in potentially tens of millions, if not
more, in attorney's fees, of which she will get the benefit because she's the originating partner on that file. So, she'll get a whole lot of money for
that, right? Well, look at this. Friday, February 13th, 2015.
So, just a few months after her initial meeting with Jeffrey Epstein,
Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy are emailing because on February 12th,
Jeffrey reaches out to her. She says, "I'm on my way to David Axelrod's book party. I'll email you when I escape."
And the next day on February 13th at 7:28 in the morning, Kathy Rumler emails Jeffrey Epstein. Quote, "I told you that
this CVR case is about money." That was the Crime Victim's Rights Act. Remember, this is the series of lawsuits that were
brought pursuant to the CV by the victims that were never notified by the Southern District of Florida's US Attorney's Office. that a deal that
sweetheart plea deal had been reached where he wouldn't be federally prosecuted and that he would only have to plead to those [ __ ]
charges in state court. So, and and and let me underscore something. As a condition of that [ __ ] sweetheart
plea deal, Jeffrey Epste was supposed to pay restitution to the victims. So, at a minimum at a minimum, the CVR case was a
well-taken case. And somebody who's a former federal prosecutor like Kathy Rumler should know should know that a CVR case is a good case because when you
violate the Crime Victim's Rights Act, it means that the prosecutor's office has done wrong. And yet she tells
Jeffrey, I told you that this CV case is about money. Then she writes him again.
Does AD Allen Dersowitz know who at Boy is doing it? Boy Schiller is one of the preeminent law firms that has been
involved in representing several of the Epstein survivors. She says, "I'm so pissed off right now that I can't see straight." To which Jeffrey Epste
replies, "Ing as in Ingred, who is one of the lawyers at Boy Schiller, who has
been representing several of the Epstein survivors." Okay.
in Jeffrey says victim's rights woman to which Kathy Rumler on February 13, 2015
writes back quote victim's rights my ass end quote
well Kathy it doesn't sound to me like that's a very professionalon only
email that sounds like a very personal response sounds like a level of indignation by you
to the fact that there's a a lawyer that's out there working to represent the Epstein survivors. And no, it's not
about money. It's about justice. I would note the stupidity about this is Jeffrey Epstein got the name of the boy Schiller
lawyer wrong. It's not Ingred, it's Cigrid McCaulay who is one of the most spectacular lawyers ever and especially
when it comes to working on behalf of these Epstein survivors. So that's just a few months after Kathy
claims that she was introduced in her purely professional relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Okay, now let's fast
forward a little bit, okay? because this is incredibly important. Just a few months later from that February 13th,
2015 exchange with Jeffrey Epstein calling a Epstein survivors lawyer who Jeffrey Epstein said was a quote
victim's rights woman. What did Kathy say? Victim's rights my ass. What do I have here? A June 16th, 2015 email
exchange between Kathy and Jeffrey Epstein. Now, Kathy Rumler, I'm going to remind you, keeps on saying, "I just had
a professional relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. I wasn't really close to him at all. Horrified by what he did." She
fords to Jeffrey Epstein on June 15, 2015 an incredibly detailed,
heartfelt, and very private email that Kathy Rumler had received from the wife
from the wife of Reed Wine Garden. Okay.
Now, this email from Cheryl Gould tells Kathy Rumler, quote, "I certainly do
hope that this time you understand the finality of your quote relationship with my husband. I hope now you can find true
happiness without having a relationship with someone else's husband. I really hope you do." And it keeps on going on.
And it basically says that Reed Weingard admitted to his wife that he had been having a yearslong affair with Kathy Rumler.
And Kathy sends this email that he received from that she received from Reed Wine Garden's wife to Jeffrey. And
Jeffrey responds, "Call me again." And then Kathy responds via email. I have reread this 10 times. The fact that he
would permit this message to stand is dispositive.
Now look, when Kathy left the White House in 2014,
another person who helped create a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein between her and Epstein according to C
to according to the Wall Street Journal was Reed Wine Garden.
Okay. So, if there's a June 2015 email from Reed Wine Garden's wife to Kathy
Rumler alleging that they Reed and Kathy have been having an affair for years and that people knew about it, by the way, which is to add insult to injury.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Wine Garden and Rumbler had been in a yearslong romantic relationship. People familiar with the matter confirmed.
20 minutesOkay. So, I don't know about you, but my professional relationships, I'm not forwarding an email from the wife of a
man that I'm alleged to be having an affair to just a professional co contact or professional acquaintance, especially
one that I am counting on to bring me new work and clients into my fancy law firm so that I can make more money and a
bonus in in a relationship and generating partner status, meaning I'm the lawyer. in the law firm that's brought in the work. So, I get a huge
chunk of the billable fees that are collected off this client. You mean to tell me that if I have this armslength relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that I
want him to see the dirty [ __ ] that is going on in my personal life that I've been having a yearslong affair with a married man whose wife has now
emailed me and said that that affair
ready quote has caused damage to Reed to herself as in Kathy to me and to our
blank redact acted who has been fighting tears all weekend because of his mother's pain and because he sees the father figure he has admired his whole life as a weak man who has lied and cheated to his mother.
Yeah. Who does that? And yet it just goes to show that Kathy is not admitting
the full extent of her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and that it went back for freaking years.
And then, hey, guess who was on the criminal defense team for Jeffrey Epstein when he got arrested in 2019?
Reed Weine Garden. Stop people. It's just such an insult to the intelligence of people that we think that we can't
that you think that we can't figure this [ __ ] out, right? Stop.
I can keep going. Let's fast forward a couple of years and look, there's Kathy Rumler. Just the name Rumbler appears
22 minutes9,461 times in the current drop of the DOJ files. And by the way, you don't even have to look up Rumbler. Sometimes you
can look up Kathy and it comes. I mean, this is just a snapshot. Okay, folks. Here we go. Let's fast forward to 2017.
January 27th, 2017.
Jeffrey Epstein is communicating with a person whose identity is redacted, who apparently was in Chicago in
February of 2017 for his American Medical Association Foundation board meeting and on the agenda is a discussion about him
becoming their candidate for surgeon general. H all righty. So this person with whom Jeffrey Epstein is communicating, this is what Jeffrey
Epstein says. Bill as in Bill Gates met met my friend Kathy Rumler Obama counsel for five years. She would love to sit
with Melinda and give her the other side of Jeffrey as in Melinda French Gates.
Now listen people, we know about the Bill Gates relationship with Jeffrey Epste. Do we not? Bill Gates just testified or gave excuse me transcribed
interview to House Oversight just a week and some change ago stating that he was blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein because of the affairs that Bill Gates was having.
So this person, this redacted person says, "Contry, couldn't hurt." To which Jeffrey Epstein, again, this is 2017.
Jeffrey Epstein tells this person, quote, "Hillary loves Kathy as does Obama. Kathy is an arch feminist who is
my great defender." To which this redacted person tells Jeffrey, "Not sure individuals can influence once impressions are made, but I will try. I
do not know for sure, but I do think he would be unwilling to bring it up with her. As in Bill would be unwilling to bring it up with Melinda. And you know what? Do you remember what Melinda French Gates said? It was one of the
reasons why she wanted to be able to split up from Bill Gates because of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Oh, so Kathy is great defender of Jeffrey
Epste. But Kathy keeps on wanting to say to Ankush Cadori here, "Oh, no. I had no idea. I knew nothing about Jeffrey
Epstein. I had no idea the extent of his criminality. I had no idea. No idea. Okay, let's keep going.
February of 2019, Jeffrey Epstein on the 22nd of February emails Brad Karp. Talk about him a lot here. Remember him? Paul
Weiss stepped the very first big law law firm to bend the knee to Donald Trump.
Jeffrey Epstein emails Brad Karp and Kathy Rumler February 22nd, 2019 talking about how Marty Weinberg was hoping that we could get a letter from the
Department of Justice stating that they will keep their promises regarding the nonprosecution agreement. Better than a deck judgment, but we should be prepared
to intervene. Stop. Jeffrey Epstein here is talking about the non-prosecution agreement that he benefited from from
the Southern District of Florida footnote that actually had four co-conspirators that were not to be prosecuted, including but not limited to, huh? Sarah Kellen and Leslie Grath.
Both of whom claimed they had no idea that their names were in the NPA. But I digress. But Marty Weinberg, again, one of the three that Jeffrey Epste called
when he was arrested in July of 2019 by the FBI. Marty Weinberg telling Jeffrey Epste, who wanted to make sure that Brad
Karp, why is Brad Karp getting involved in this? H because we knew that Brad Karp was also sending his emails and his going to these special events and
special parties, um, these unique events, right, with Jeffrey Epstein.
Marty saying, "A letter from the Department of Justice about the nonprostitution agreement. It's better than a declaratory judgment, meaning it's better than a court stating that
the nonprosecution agreement applies in this case of Jeffrey being investigated by the Southern District of New York.
So, of course, now Kathy Kathy who swears never had Jeffrey Epste as a client, but whatever. I gave him
informal advice. Yeah. Okay. Then March 2nd, 2019, just maybe a week and a half
later. Jeffrey Epstein emails on March 2nd, the following people. The
subject timesensitive, Ken Star, Marty Weinberg, Alan Dersowitz, Kathy Rumler,
and Darren Indk. And he says, "Now that the New York Times, the paper of record, has gotten so many facts and conclusions wrong, I thought a direct response to the editorial board was now appropriate.
thoughts on more than one member of the team. The team on the by line starting with the suggestion that five professional
criminal defense attorneys somehow colluded with Alex Aosta. Remember him?
The former US attorney for the Southern District of Florida who signed off on and got and got approval for that sweetheart plea deal is preposterous.
Later on, a Florida case of sex for money. This is Jeffrey Epste talking to his quote team that included Kathy Rumler. A Florida case of sex for money.
The ages of a minority of the women actually under 18 at the time. Oh, so Jeffrey admitted that Kathy, that case that you thought was so weak. Jeffrey's
telling you that a minority of the women are actually under 18 at the time.
Okay. Do you actually ask him about that? No. Kathy, what do you do? You respond by this. You say the following.
This is great. Highly recommend that we not let perfect be the enemy of the good. And get the submitted. ASAP while fresh and New York Times editorial board should feel pressure to publish.
And then there's this whole conspiring going on between Jeffrey Epstein's legal team about trying to get this push to the New
York Times op-ed board about who's going to sign off. Marty Weinberg thinks, "Hey, Ken Star says Alan Dersuit should
cosign with Jeffrey Epstein." Marty says, "Let's drop Allan in the middle of the signitories." Allan is in there
editorial, so his absence as a co-signatory is noticeable. Lily as in Lily Anne Sanchez. Now remember,
Lilianne Sanchez was a former federal prosecutor who worked at the Southern District of Florida and then jumped to
go beyond the Epstein criminal defense team when he was being prosecuted in the mid 2000s and helped negotiate his state
charges and that deal. A little bit tight timing, don't you think, Lily?
Good to have female. I think we pick a time for Roy as in Roy Black, the late criminal defense attorney who was on Jeffrey Epstein's criminal defense team,
Lily, and send to editors, then follow up to push for publication.
Okay, so this is March of 2019. Purely professional, right? Okay. March 7th,
five days later, Jeffrey Epstein is texting with Steve Bannon, who again, I do not understand why Steve Bannon has not had his ass hauled before House
oversight to answer questions about Jeffrey Epstein. But here we go. March 7th, 2019. Steve Bannon texts to Jeffrey Epstein a copy of a Daily Beast article
about Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dersuitz and pals accused of sex trafficking ring. It's a picture of Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dersowitz. To which Epstein
says, "More incoming, I guess." Hunker down. Wait until the wave stop.
Thoughts? And Coulter also went after me. Bannon says she's obsessed with you.
Epstein. She should get in line, but I'm not a Democrat. Bannon, how did she come after you? She can make you a household name and not on a positive way. And then
he sends Anne Coulter. Subject: media magic. How a Democrat pedophile became a Trump scandal. Oh, I'm sorry. That is
Jeffrey Epstein sending that to Steve Bannon. I'm on her team. That's why this is nuttier. Don't you have stroke with her? Saying this to Steve Bannon. Bannon says, "Not on this topic." Zero.
Epstein. Understood. Is there anything I can do except for perfecting the art of being a punching bag? Bannon, it's bad.
Never seen anything like it. I agree with you, Steve Bannon, about that.
30 minutesEpste says, "Billy Bush, at least Trump had some supporters fighting back." Rumbler proposal. Meaning, now this is
what Jeffrey Epste is sending on March 7th, 2019 to Steve Bannon. And this is the proposal from Kathy Rumler that she gave to Jeffrey Epstein about having to
fight back on all of the bad news and bad print that was coming out about Jeffrey Epstein. Quote, this is Kathy
Rumler. The criticism is wrong and reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of both the facts underlying Mr. Epste's case and how it was prosecuted by both
local and federal authorities. Far from receiving a sweetheart deal, Mr. Epstein was subjected to a lengthy, aggressive, and highly unusual federal investigation
for what were in essence local offenses of sexual solicitation. He accepted responsibility, served time in prison, and paid significant monetary settlements to the victims involved.
Bannon says, "This is awesome. What is it?" Epstein. This is what Kathy suggests we tell WAPO, as in the
Washington Post. This is to push back on what the Washington Post was reporting.
I mean, okay, Kathy, I I I'm I'm still speechless, right? I I
find it so hard to believe that you have no idea because you keep on telling Ankush Cardori and this ridiculous apo
lack of apology to the victims of Epstein, right? But like you sit there and and Kush, I'm also still still disappointed with you because this is a
ridiculous like fluff piece about Kathy Rumler blaming law culture as to and the fact that she's a woman in a legal field
which by the way I speak out all the [ __ ] time about and I still think it's terribly terribly skewed against women. It is so hard for them to become
equity partners and I totally agree. But guess what? Some of us go and start our own law firms and some of us bring a create our own clients so that we can be
picking and choosing who we want to represent so that we don't feel the pressure internally for being able from being forced to have to bring on clients that we don't want to represent.
Gosh, I wonder how hard that would have been leaving the Obama White House and having access to all of that money means
and influence. But no, you wanted you wanted to stay in Epstein's world. Why?
Oh well gosh. Let's keep going with the emails and the text messages.
Remember this is Kathy saying only professional relationship, nothing more.
April 16th, 2015. Kathy, we have a birthday gift to deliver to you. Are you back in New York? Morning Kathy. We're
ready to deliver your birthday gift from Jeffrey. Can you please let me know if we should bring to your apartment and leave at the doorman or do you prefer to your office? Thanks. Redacted. Kathy
writes back. I think my door man at the apartment is best. Thank you. Is there a reason why you didn't want to get it at the office? Well, according to this puff
piece by Ankush Cardori, Kathy Rumler says, "Oh, this is part for the course. Gifts from clients all the time." Okay.
Do we also say to our to our professional clients am totally tricked out by Uncle Jeffrey today, Jeffrey
boots, handbag, and watch to which client says yay. This is uh January 4th, 2019.
before then on June 22nd, 2018 when Jeffree sends forward the Daily Beast article, How Did Trump and Clinton uh
escape. Oh, I don't know. Something about me, Too. I'm not even going to bother clicking on the link. But then Kathy writes back, "Good lord, a nolla
of rehashed crap." Yeah, sounds like friends. But wait, there's more.
Gifts to Kathy from Jeffrey for her birthday. flowers, spa certificates, a 2018 Valentine's gift of hair and makeup
services, plus the $25 tip charged on his credit card, a wire payment of $53,750 to a private jet charter company.
34 minutesAccording to Kathy Rumler's spokeswoman, Kathy did not accept the private jet gift.
Epstein tried to give Kathy 1 million American Express rewards points. When that proved too difficult, his team instead sent $10,000 of Burgdoff Goodman
points. And in September 16th, Jeffrey Epstein sent a $9,350 Hermes handbag. And then in 2019,
January, she also ended up getting a Apple Watch with an Hermes band. And
that's when she wrote, "Oh, I'm all tricked out today by Uncle Jeffrey."
Sorry folks, I didn't write like that with my clients. And my clients weren't sending me to the spa, nor were they, you know, uh, sending private jets, um,
nor were they sending me Birkin bags, etc., etc.
I'm not saying that it isn't done. I'm just saying it just doesn't feel like this was par for the course of a simply
professional relationship. I could keep going, but I think you get the gist of this. And so I'm really really kind of
gonna underscore my disappointment that this New York Times thing was Kathy
Rumler's way of getting ready getting ready for her house oversight interview. And and here's one thing I
want to share with you before you and I left before you and I part ways. Are you ready? Kathy left Laam in 2020 and became the general counsel at Goldman
Sachs and she's now stepping down from that role, but she will remain as a quote advisor at the request of the chief executive at Goldman Sachs, a guy
named David Solomon. But as she leaves at the end of this month, at the end of June, she'll walk away with $25 million
for the work she did last year in 2025 in $80 million in stock options.
Listen to this. The New York Times recently reported that Goldman Sachs had at one point hired an online reputation management firm, Terraite, to promote
positive content about Ms. Rumler amid the stories about her dealings with Mr.
Epstein. I never had any contact with Terit. Now, this is Ankush Kadori saying, "I never had contact with Terra." It's so transparent.
Kathy Rumler reached out to Ankush Cardori. According to Ankush in this piece, he stated, "She contacted me in
March and asked if I would like to hear her side of the Epstein story." So, this is March. Now, we're in June, and now she's about to go to House Oversight. I
mean, this is such a transparent attempt by Kathy Rumler to whitewash her reputation because she knows that what's going to come out at House Oversight's going to be just as bad, if not worse.
and that this apologist piece just really kind of says,
you know what, I know it smells bad, but trust me, I didn't do it. I I I just I got problems with it.
Thanks for sticking through this with me. I know it was a little bit longer of content, but if you like this type of deep dive, which I feel like we don't
get otherwise in mainstream, just like, subscribe, share this, let people understand
that folks from Epstein's orbit are scrambling now. They know there's serious fallout from this. And this
piece blames the law firm culture for Kathy Rumler's bad judgment.
And I just don't even think that's fair to the bad law firm culture, which is exists. Let me be very clear. I'm not an apologist for the bad law firm culture.
But that doesn't explain the personal nature and the intimate nature of her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. It
just doesn't. So I call [ __ ] Kathy Rumler, you are welcome to have a conversation with me. I am happy to sit down and interview you, but I do think
you should be prepared because there is documentary evidence that suggests that you are not being forthcoming when you
spoke to Ankush Cardori for this New York Times piece. Be mad, be outraged, man accountability. I'm off to rattle some more cages. Katie Fang here. We
launched the Katy Fang news channel in partnership with the Midas Touch Network so we could bring you the latest in legal and political news. Straight, no
chaser. So, if you're a fellow trutht teller, hit that subscribe button and share the word about this channel so we
can build a highinformation America

[admin]

How Epstein Linked Up With the Maxwells (MOSSAD Family) (w/ Maureen Tkacik)
The Chris Hedges YouTube Channel
Jun 22, 2026



*******************

Epstein, the Russian Mob, & the Hidden Assets of the Maxwells (w/ Moe T.) | The Chris Hedges Report
The Chris Hedges YouTube Channel
Jun 4, 2026

Investigative journalist Maureen Tkacik uncovers Jeffrey Epstein’s role at the epicenter of the billionaire cabal’s global information and financial network by exploring the hidden assets of the New York Daily News, and the 1991 Larry Summers-spearheaded privatization scheme of Soviet Russia's state assets.

[admin]

Trump EXPOSED as Journalist FORCES Trump’s OWN Epstein Files RELEASED to the PUBLIC!!!
Legal AF
Jun 26, 2026

Katie Phang joins Popok to exclusively brief our audience on her trailblazing, historic successful suit against the Trump Administration and Todd Blanche, as a federal judge grants her injunction and orders that Blanche comply by "July 2nd" with the Epstein Act and release the Trump/sex assault victims files and all "foreign language" files to the public.