Injuries on Charlie's Chest Reveal Potential Source(s) of Blast - Ep 134
Baron Coleman
Streamed live 3 hours ago
Today on X, I released a photograph that had not been seen publicly before today. In it, there are clear injuries. There also is an apparent rectangle where almost no injuries occurred. I'll tell you what I think it means. That picture is available at x.com/baroncoleman.
We also follow up on a witness who was featured on TV after Charlie Kirk was taken down. Who is she? And is there a reason she was interviewed.
Search transcript
Chapter 1: Why Candace Owens had an Emergency Broadcast
All right, guys. Welcome in. I'm as well as I can be. I am sick. Holy mackerel.
Um, but today is an important day. So, I am not in a hoodie. I apologize. You will soon understand in a few minutes why I am not in a hoodie. Um, there is It has nothing to do with me being sick.
There's a particular reason I'm not in a hoodie, but when [clears throat] I get there, you will um you'll understand why, but I did not feel like a day today was a day I could miss um for a couple
reasons. one is um last night uh
I had a very serious conversation uh about this case and you know sometimes you you realize
you have half of a story and someone else has half of a story and you don't know the other person has the
other half and then you get to talking and you're just you know sort of of working your way through a story and you
realize, holy mackerel. Um, if if I show this and you show that, we we've I think
we have a big component of the story and neither of us um were aware of it. So, spoke with Candace last night for a very
long time. Um, I want to be very clear about something. Nobody's gatekeeping anything. Uh, nobody's gatekeeping anything. There's there's been I I've
been watching X here the last couple of hours since Candace kicked off her show two two or three hours ago and um the haters are out in full force. That's to
be expected. That's that's normal. The haters are out in full force and the reason is because I don't think
we've ever been closer to to verifying a key component of this story. Period.
um several months ago, six or seven months ago, I I came into possession of a a photograph and it was not one that was part of the
public um publicly released photographs to that point. And I described it to the audience when I got it, but I was given explicit instructions from the source.
And you guys may not understand how this works, but if you want people to give you information, sometimes it comes with conditions.
So, if you know, I'll pull up a random person here. Um, this is uh Beth Parl Paris. Beth Paris. If Beth comes to me
and says, "Hey, humble host, I have um a story, but you can't share it, but if
you can somehow use it to um to to get some more information or to help put pieces together in your head, I'd like you to at least be aware it happened.
But you may not even talk about it. You can't reveal to anyone that you've talked to somebody who's explained these things. You can't reveal to anyone that
you've had a conversation with anyone at all on this topic. Let's say it's, you know, I saw somebody running across the Losi center roof and this is the time
they ran across and oh, I happen to capture a picture of it. Here's the picture. But I don't want you to use it in any capacity.
You accept that information on those terms. And if you're a person of integrity, you obey those terms. you
obey the terms. Um, I've lived my life keeping secrets. That's just the the nature of what I do. I'm a lawyer.
Somewhere over there, there's an oath on my wall over there. I don't know if you guys can see it. It's over here. Um, is the oath I took to to be part of the Florida Bar in 2007.
And one of those is you keep your client's secrets. So, I've kept my client's secrets for the better part of 20 years. I was first licensed to
practice law in August or September of 2006. Uh first practiced law in Florida in 2007,
April of 2007. Uh finally licensed in Tennessee here in the last few years. I'm not even sure what year that was.
But um but you keep your client's secrets. You know, I've had I've had clients tell me, "Look, I committed the crime, but I don't want to go to prison."
Okay. Well, let's offer the best defense we can do within the confines of the law, within the bounds of the law. And so you come up with a defense. Maybe
maybe your client doesn't testify because if he testifies and he's honest, he's going to admit he did it. So maybe he doesn't testify or maybe maybe he
does testify, but he's very cautious about what he says, not to lie, but to make the other side draw it out of him.
Whatever it is, but as the lawyer, you're not allowed to tell anyone your client did it. I've never told Mrs.
Coleman that. I've never told anyone some of the things my clients have told me because I am bound to secrecy. I honor sources the same way. I honor sources the same way.
I received this photo with the idea or with the understanding, the gim, the limitation, the guards. You may describe the picture, you may not show the
picture. And there were particular reasons why. And he did not want me to explain why I could not show the picture. And that's fine. I honored it.
And so I did describe the picture. And what I described was uh what I would call like negative space. There's there's there's damage to the chest or
there are marks around the chest, but there's clear negative space in that in that uh I'll pull her comment down.
There's clear negative space in that in that area there.
And I I described that I described what I saw.
I've since gotten permission to show a part of the photograph and I did that today on X and I refer you to my ex account, Baron Coleman, because I
unfortunately YouTube rules are not going to allow me to show it on camera.
today. So if you want to see it and know what I'm talking about, you have to go to the expost x.com
Baron Coleman and you will you'll see it there. Baron with one R Coleman. Um, and we'll talk about that a little bit tonight. But I honored the condition
and so I clipped it down to what he told me I could share and I shared it today because I now have permission to do that. The um idea that that is somehow
called considered gatekeeping is ludicrous. Right? It's ludicrous.
There's also another reason why you might not show everything you have. And I've talked to several podcasters who are holding additional material and they
might not be showing everybody what they have because they're letting people walk into it. They're letting you you give
enough, they respond, and in their response you allow them you you're setting a trap. I'll give you a very famous
example. James O'Keefe is an investigative reporter. He used to run a nonprofit called Project Veritass. I think he runs something now called like
James O'Keeffe Network or something. I'm not sure what it is. Uh very smart guy, very capable uh investigator, uh great journalist, and he has made a career out
of going undercover and getting people to say things that they wouldn't or ordinarily say, and then he then publishes that stuff.
He's he's done a great job with it. He's uh he's probably the best. But his he made his name on a a story called The Acorn Story. I don't know if you guys
remember the Acorn story. I actually have it lined up and outlined to do an open one day. Maybe I'll still do it, but I want to talk about it briefly right now. There was a nonprofit called Acorn.
And [clears throat] what Acorn would do is they would um help miners get illegal abortions. I think that's I don't think
I'm mischaracterizing that. If I am, I apologize. I'm not trying to. But but he went undercover and he showed where they
were doing this in at least one occasion and he released it and instantly the organization came out and said, "Oh, no, no, no, no, no. We're
not doing it all over. That's just that onea one one location." They went rogue.
Okay. So about a week later he drops another location.
Oh, no, no, no. This isn't a companywide policy. That's just another rogue location. We didn't know they were doing that. And then he dropped another one
and another one and another one. And what he eventually showed is it was in fact a widespread practice within this organization.
And he took ACORN down. He got federal funding strip from ACORN. Um they became associated with uh you know sort of in
the public vernacular if you talk about ACORN is sort of a joke of an organization. They might be doing fine stuff now. I have no idea what they're doing. I haven't followed them in 15 years.
But had he released everything he had on day one, they wouldn't have walked into the story. So what he did was and he he
consulted with a guy named Andrew Breitbart. I don't know if you guys remember Andrew Breitbart. He was sort of a a Gonzo journalist himself and he went to Breitbart and he said,
"Hey, I have this story on Acorn. I have all these 10 things. We're going to take down Acorn." He said, "No, no, no, no, no. We're not going to take down Acorn.
You never do things for one reason. Yes, we're going to take down Acorn, but we're going to take down the media." And so what he did was he he put out the
single ACORN story and he let every all the media come to the defense of ACORN.
And then once the media had come to the defense of ACORN, then he showed time and time again all the instances where this was a
widespread practice and the media lost a tremendous amount of credibility because it became obvious they weren't in search of the truth. They weren't reporting what happened. they were uh just trying to to cover for a political position.
They just that's all they were doing.
And and when I was talking to Candace last night, she shared with me that she was doing the same thing, that there
were some images that she had in her possession that she had released and they showed a few pieces of those black flexcks around the SUV that I don't
think I'm sharing anything she didn't want me to share. If so, I apologize, principal. Um, but they showed a few images of the the black flex around the
SUV, and she rightly identified that as glass, what looked like a broken road microphone. You could even see the white
paint on it. I'll show you um show you an example of it right here.
Here's a road microphone. Um, you can see the white paint on it. You can see the there's there's different white images around this and it's all covered
in some sort of a tempered glass. You can see it shining off the studio lights in the background.
And it's a lot of it. It's a lot of it.
And so she allowed everyone to come to the defense and act like she was crazy.
Oh, that's not tempered glass. That's not black glass. That's so stupid. That Candace, she just makes stuff up. She doesn't know what she's talking about.
And so I I I kind of said, "Hey, it's time. You know, you're going on vacation for a couple weeks. It's time. It's time to drop the hammer on all these trolls.
Time to drop the hammer on Gary Meltdown. It's time to drop the hammer on Lisa Knows nothing. It's time to drop the hammer on, you know, uh, Mohawk
Allen. It's time to drop the hammer on these people because what they're doing is the equivalent of what the media did in the Acorn story. They're just coming
to the defense of a political position that they prefer. I'm now convinced there are only two classes of people who believe Tyler Robinson
planned and executed Charlie Kirk alone from the Losi center roof with a granddad's 306. There only two classes of people. One is people who pay no attention.
They've been told that on the media.
They accepted it and they moved on. They do other stuff. They take their kids to volleyball practice. Maybe they coach a softball league.
Maybe they coach their uh know termite league football, pee-wee football. Uh you know, five, six, eight year olds playing playing tackle football. Well,
maybe they maybe they have a job where they work a week.
Unfortunately, in this economy, that's increasingly common. You have a job and then you have a second job and then you you run Uber Eats in the evening and you I mean, I know a lot of people this way.
This is what they do because it's a very expensive uh economy. It's a very expensive time to be alive and they just
don't have time to investigate the Charlie Kirk assassination. So, they hear on Fox News that Tyler Robinson did it. They just accept it. So, that's kind of class one.
The only other class of people who believe Tyler Robinson solely planned and executed Charlie Kirk from the Losi
Center with Grandad's 306 are people who politically support TPUSA and um our greatest ally. That's it.
That's it. Every other person believes there's something wrong with this story.
It doesn't add up. It doesn't make sense. But those people who do pay attention, who know better,
immediately came to the defense of TPUSA and said, "That's not broken glass.
That's something else. That we don't know what that is. You guys are just making stuff up." And so I said, "You know what? It's time. Go ahead and drop the hammer on them. You're going to be
gone for a couple of weeks. That gives everyone two weeks to come forward." And then we looked at some pictures.
And I saw in one of the pictures a missing piece to the picture I've been holding on to. I'll show you that tonight. I saw in one of those pictures
a missing piece of the evidence I've been holding on to and and have not had permission to share to this to this point. Only describe, not share.
And that was a singed material, a burned piece of material.
Because when I have my picture that is available on x.com, you can go look at it. What you see
is a piece of Charlie's body that's about this big that is undamaged.
And that piece was right here on his body.
Right here on his body. There's a piece on his body. The corner is to his right nipple
and then it goes back and down a couple of inches and then forward two or three inches and then back up and is plain as day. It looks like there was an adhesive
something or something taped to his body in that location and all around it is damage.
14 minutesIt's damage.
Skin damage. Uh it, you know, is it smeared blood? I don't know what it is, but it is damage. It looks like burns to me. I don't think blood would dry that
quickly. Maybe some of it is blood mixed in with some of the other stuff, but it's clear whatever happened here. You
have above it a a big thing of red. You have behind it a thing of red. It almost looks like a sunburn. And you have below
it a thing of red that looks kind of like splotchy sunburn. It It looks like burned skin to me.
And so I'm going to tell you tonight what I think it was. It's it's the missing piece that I've not had is what was right there. You know, was he
recovering from some sort of rib injury and had a lidocaine patch? Actually have one of those here. The lidocaine patch.
It's um fuzzy on one side, slick on the other. This side, if you pull this adhesive off, this this plastic sheath
on the back, it's sticky and it's got a medicine in it. I've used these on my shoulder. I have a bad shoulder and I will put these right here and they will
help soothe the shoulder. This the skin will absorb that lidocaine.
And so I don't know, did he have a broken rib and he had a lidocaine patch right there? But if so, why did they take it off?
This had to be taken off while he was under the table.
And the reason I say that is because the picture I have, the metadata says it was about 24 to s after the Big Bang.
If you remember, after the Big Bang, Charlie goes down, everybody's behind the table and they're doing stuff.
Everybody's grabbing. They actually lift Charlie's arm up at one point. No idea what they're doing under there.
Arm comes back down. Um maybe in the coming days or weeks we'll go over some of that footage. That arm comes down and
then they carry him off. And when they carry him off, his shirt is kind of rolled up up here and they're holding on to that shirt with their hands. They're
not supporting his head. His head is dangling at an angle. I cannot make my neck do like it's it's kind of like upside down.
The image I have shows his face and his head and his neck. And that's why I was asked not to show the picture because I do think that picture would be traumatic
to his family. I genuinely do. Um he's he looks dead and his neck is being held in such a
position that I I just am shocked, frankly shocked that these sons of biscuits did not protect his head and
neck as they were carrying him off and chucking him into an SUV like a side of beef.
But I could not get over, if you've got the picture up on another image, if you got it up on another computer or a phone or something and you're looking at this image, I could not get over what I call that negative space.
The negative space is some sort of adhesive or some sort of device that was right here under his right
17 minutesnipple. And I'm going to tell you tonight in just a second what I think it was, what I think was right there. I could be
wrong. I'm open to being wrong, but I think it was one of these.
Chapter 2: About the Rode Microphone Theory; My Spin on the Theory
When you have one of these and you're broadcasting from it, I'm going to broadcast from it now for just a moment so you guys can hear what it sounds like. I'm going to switch from my
regular mic to the road go wireless mic. That's what I'm broadcasting from now. It's in here.
You can't see it, but it is it is in here. It's equipped with the ma with the u black magnet that you guys see on
Charlie's shirt. I have no idea what I sound like right now. The microphone is on the inside of my shirt.
The magnet is on the outside of my shirt. This is the the setup he had.
Now, in order to operate this mic to a computer, in order to um to operate this mic into
a computer, I'm going to flip back to my regular mic because you guys say it sounds like crap.
[snorts]
There, back on the regular mic. In order to operate this microphone, this is the mic. You can see it's on,
lights on. In order to operate this microphone to a computer, to capture audio on a
computer in real time, it has to have one of these. You'll see this is on.
This is the receiver for the audio. You can see it's connected to my computer right now with a cord, a C, a C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C TOC connection.
Doing this means my road microphone is attached to my computer. It's recording locally to my computer. I mean, it's not
not recording locally. It's recording to my computer.
You guys that are complaining about the audio being under the shirt, that ought to tell you why what they were doing with Charlie Kirk was not was not correct.
It ought to tell you that them putting that microphone on under his shirt is not a way to capture good audio.
And there might have been some other reason they were recording that way. I don't know what it was.
But this thing right here normally is connected to a camera or a computer.
But if you are Charlie Kirk and you don't know much about
microphones and audio and all that, I can see
someone convincing you that having this thing attached under your shirt right here
is some new thing we're trying. We're going to capture audio differently.
We're going to capture this audio differently.
And it's just under your shirt right here. It's just under your shirt right here.
What you'll notice is these things are constructed the same. They have the same glass tempered finish.
They're the same size. They have the same sides. They have the same back.
So if one of these was destroyed, you wouldn't know which one it is.
You'd have no idea.
Is it the road microphone that was up here under his shirt or is it something that was down here under his right nipple?
And when we go back and watch the footage of Charlie being I'm going to put these This is how
they're stored. This is how the new version is stored. They're stored on this little USB tree. When we go watch the video footage of Charlie being taken
down, there's absolutely no doubt in my mind, 0% doubt in my mind that something under his shirt went crazy.
Shirts don't act like that in response to a 306 round to the neck. They just don't.
Period. End of story. They never will act like it. But what about this? What about this?
If you have your transmitter or your receiver, excuse me,
and it's somehow attached to this and it makes a big bang or it explodes or it has some sort of directional
charge. I prefer directional charge from shape charge. Shape charge has a specific meaning that I don't think applies here, but I think directional charge is very accurate
and it explodes and it it's it's gone and it's broken.
You can see in the video footage a microphone looking thing fall down into his shirt.
You can also see the magnet stays put on his neck up here.
And so what you end up with is TPUSA saying, "No, his microphone didn't explode.
The microphone on his neck, no, no, no, no. It didn't explode at all. It remained whole up here.
But you still have a source of this blacktempered glass.
And you have it all inside of his shirt.
You notice after the event, a lot of people were walking around looking all over the ground underneath the tent.
You notice they immediately dug up 10 in of dirt all around the area. They blocked it off so no one could walk there. And then they dug up 10 inches of
dirt and moved it out of the way and put down concrete pavers in the dead of night. Well, I say dead of night over the weekend in Utah, which is essentially the dead of night, right?
Sunday in Utah, not a lot of activities happening.
And I think that's precisely what happened. If you look at the image that I posted on X today that I cannot show on YouTube. I'm sorry. I just cannot.
But if you look at that image, you'll see something about this big was covering his chest.
And it would have been a perfect place to mount something this big on top of it.
It would have been a perfect place to mount something that big on top of it.
Now, when something that big comes from right here and it explodes or it sends a directional charge, a directional
um explosion, I think it hit his necklace.
I think it came out and it hit his necklace and sent his necklace up at a very high rate of speed.
I have reason to believe that the charge itself was not PETN, but that it was C4.
uh if it was related to the AES plant explosion and I don't know that it was but if it was it would have been C4
not PETN and I'll explain next week why I believe that uh we have documentation to support that
absolutely have documentation to support that that if it was related to AES if it was related to that August 25th delivery
of some sort of anti-personnel extra small anti-person uh anti uh personnel demolition device that it
is a C4 order, not a PET order. C4 is made from something called RDX. It's an explosive. They mix it with some
plasticizers and you can mold it to go in any direction you want. This is something they use in demolitions all the time. They'll mold the C4 around the joints of a piece of steel, for example.
It's very stable. You can shoot u C4 with a gun and it will not explode.
You can throw it into a fireplace with a burning fire and it will not explode. In order for C4 to explode, it has to have an electric charge.
An electric charge has to put a certain pulse into the C4.
And that C4 in in response to that shock wave will then explode. it'll detonate.
I don't know what that electric charge would have been in this situation. I don't know. Again, I'm not 100% sure it was C4 or PETN,
but if you look at the image I posted today on X, there is no doubt in my mind, 0% doubt in my mind whatsoever
that he had something taped or or adhesive, some sort of uh fixed to his body, something about this big.
Now, I'm going to show you a couple pictures. This is going to be a little different show than I normally do. I'm going to show you a picture of why I think it's that big.
This is the first picture.
This is the first picture. This is what I'm talking about right here. This right here, you can see has charred edges.
This looks like charred edges. Some sort of metallic something that looks burned. This thing looks burned.
It's blackened. It's charred. It has some blood on it.
But if it if it was stuck to the body from behind,
then all this would roll over the top of it and it would create that effect I'm talking about. It would it would roll over the top.
All that blood and stuff would roll over the top of this and the body itself would not get bloody. It would not get burned. It
would not get charred because the body itself is protected. The body itself is protected from that.
And if you look at the picture I posted on X, you'll see precisely what I'm talking about. Now, let me go back to this for a second and I'll tell you why I know it's that big. A lot of pe I
heard I watched Candace today. She did an excellent job, but a lot of people were speculating it might be a t-shirt or something that was burned.
I can tell you for a fact it's not that big. Uh, first that's the entry of the door.
You can even see a little piece of the black stuff right there. But that's the entry to the door right there. That that entry to the door, you know, is only a few inches. And this is smaller than that.
But I want you to look at this right here.
That's one of these. This is a pulox.
I want you to look at the size of the pulseox compared to the size of the negative space on Charlie.
They're about the same, right? They're about the same size.
So, if you go back and look at this piece of charred material, whatever this is, and you look at it relative to this
Chapter 3: New Pictures of the SUV Used to Remove Charlie Kirk
pulseox machine, they're about the same size, but this has been folded up a little bit. probably had some adhesive on it.
Probably was a little bit malleable.
It was able to be bent. And so as they rip it off of his body, that's the condition it comes out in. It looks a little bit like this.
But you can see it's about the same size, give or take.
But it's these chars even with the little pieces of black in it. You can see right here, for example, I don't know if you can see my mouse,
but I'm like maybe a third of the way up in the middle. You can see a little piece of that charred plastic right there. You can see another little piece
over here beside it. Right here, you can see two little metal pieces.
Look like little metal wire clips or something, little holders. That makes a lot of sense if you're talking about explosives. You would need some sort of metal to conduct the charge.
But to me, these are about the same size.
And again, if you go back and look at the negative space on Charlie's body, they're about the same size. Now, the only other thing I've heard that this
might be that made sense to me is the lithium ion battery inside the microphone. I don't believe it's that.
I don't believe it's that. Um, if it is, that's even more damning because that means this microphone clearly exploded.
But I've seen people on X. I'll show you an example of one here. Um where they have um
that is a lithium ion battery. You can see the the layers to it here.
And you can see how this kind of might have some layers to it. I just don't think that's what it is.
I think it is instead whatever it was that was covering Charlie's body right there.
But that's the piece that I've been missing from my hypothesis that the explosive charge did not come from his
neck at all. It came from below him, taped to his body, strapped to his body.
Now, I believe it was meant to look like a chest wound, chest shot. We we saw the
highlight reel of people in newscast saying that they thought they saw a chest wound.
I don't know. Maybe um or maybe they were sent out to say that. I I tend to think the reason they said that is they
saw so much activity under the shirt that it didn't make sense that it was a neck shot. Because instinctively, intuitively, we know that that you don't
get a neck wound that causes your shirt to move the way Charlie's shirt moved.
when he was taken down, but the what was supposed to look like a chess shot, I think, malfunctioned.
If you look carefully at that picture I put up on X, if you have it pulled up, and I again, I deeply apologize I'm unable to do this. If you look at this
picture on X, you can actually see kind of towards the middle of his torso where his pendant was hanging, you can see another couple of small marks on his body.
Maybe tomorrow or something I'll put up one that's a little more clear on that or I'll highlight it or I'll make it brighter or something. I added no editing to this. I just clipped it out.
This is exactly how I received the image.
But I think when it exploded, it hit that necklace and it caused the necklace to shoot up into the pull his
shirt way up like that. Now, what entered the neck? Was it some sort of directional charge? Was it some sort of
object that was propelled from the from the exploding uh device? I don't know.
Was it the cross or St. Michael's pendant or whatever that went into his neck? I don't know. I don't know.
But you can tell a couple of things from the nature of the the wound itself. One thing you can tell is it's not very deep. It's not very deep. It looks like
it just kind of goes right here. The other thing you can tell is it's not arterial blood. It's vein. It's venus blood. It's the jugular vein right
33 minutesthere, not the artery that runs right next to it. And the reason you can tell that is it's it's the right color for
arterial blood, but it also doesn't spurt like arterial blood does. You arterial blood is pumping very fast
and it just if you see someone get shot in the neck, I mean, it just shoots shoots blood away from him. Whereas his just sort of rolled out. That's more um
that's more in line with venus blood, jugular vein blood, than it is um arterial blood. Even though both of
those tubes, both of those vessels run right there in the same part of the neck.
I'm sweating like a pig because I got a fever. Sorry guys. Um,
what this sets up for me is a situation where multiple people would have had to convince Charlie, hey, we're trying something new.
We're going to tape one of these things to your midsection here. We'll put something under it so it's not uncomfortable. You know, you don't want to just like tape a microphone to
somebody's body, you know. We'll put an adhesive down and then we'll affix the microphone to that adhesive or the receiver to that adhesive
and then that was detonated or that went off.
And you can tell, in my opinion, plain as day, that's what happened under the chest.
So, when I put this picture up, a lot of people said, "Well, that's not where his microphone was." Well, no kidding. Not at all where his microphone was. But
there's one more piece of this that makes a lot of sense that I might be right. And it's that there's wounds to
the top, there's damaged skin to the outside, and there's damaged skin underneath, but there's no damaged skin on this side.
If you explode something and you want it to go that way, the device itself is going to have a tremendous amount of pull going that way
because physics is physics. For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. You've seen a rocket take off, right?
The the the the smoke, the exhaust goes down, the rocket goes up.
People are asking for the X account. Let me put it up here and you can go look at it here.
x.com/baroncom.
You'll go there and you'll see the picture I'm talking about. You have to scroll down. Maybe I can pin this
uh pinned to my profile. There we go. So now it's pinned to the top of the profile. Um so you'll see what I'm talking about.
And you would see that the energy would come this way and cause the burns and the whatever this way, but the but whatever the object is would come this way.
I believe he was probably rigged to make it look like he got shot over here
and it malfunctioned and it hit something that that then went into his neck. Hit the necklace or hit
something and went into his neck. That's just a guess. Um, it could have actually shot a round of some sort up, but but
that that to me is a little more difficult to explain. I don't know the precise mechanics of the how, but I'm
confident this image shows a lot about what the how was.
That he had something affixed to his body here and that that caused a tremendous amount of damage to his body in that location.
But that whatever it was that padding, whatever this stuff is, took the brunt of the damage.
Took the brunt of the damage. Now I want to go to a different image
37 minutesbecause this
image here is the newest image we have of the SUV
that shows the broken glass. This was the trap that Candace had set and let people walk right into it.
The previous image we had of the SUV did not show this down here. Did not show all this broken glass down here.
It showed little pieces and shards kind of sprinkled around up here. Like you could see these little pieces up here.
It showed some in the back seat where Frank was sitting where just a few of them were scattered around.
But it did not show the bulk of it which was down here.
There's no explanation to me short of
one of these things exploding, one of these things breaking and being damaged. There's absolutely no
explanation for why broken glass, broken black glass with little right pieces of white pieces of writing on them are
collected directly between the bucket seats where Charlie's torso was laying
whatsoever. There's no explanation for me why this would be down here based on the story we were told about
what happened on the way to the hospital.
That explanation fails to explain all this broken glass. Nor do I believe all
this broken glass fell off of Charlie as he's laid over these two bucket seats
and nobody noticed all this stuff was falling off of him. I refuse to believe that they didn't notice.
I refuse to believe that they did not know this was coming off of Charlie's body or was wiped off of Charlie's body,
which would help explain why some of it is sprinkled around the back seat, sprinkled around the front seat.
And so when I learned that she had this other image and that she was waiting for people to come and say, "Hey, oh, that's
not broken glass. That's just we don't know what that is. That could be dried flaked up blood. I heard people saying it was dried flaked up blood. Well, that's not dried flaked up blood.
I heard people say, "Ah, maybe maybe somebody dropped their cell phone." Nobody dropped their cell phone. Nobody in the car claims to have dropped and
broken their cell phone. And if they did, you'll know that's not what broken cell phone glass looks like either. And you have to kind of pick at it to get
the broken glass to fall off the cell phone anyway. It just you fall and shatter the cell phone. It it it remains in one screen. It doesn't it doesn't fall out.
And so my thought was, we've got them.
We've got them because they did not tell us about the burn on Charlie's chest or the negative
space where there was no injury on Charlie's chest. They did not tell us about the broken glass in between the bucket seats.
They told us that they had a relatively uneventful ride from either of those perspectives.
But Frank Turret gave us a good a good um clue that they knew that burnmark existed.
Do you remember his ridiculous story um about
um his ridiculous story about um him
cutting the shirt off because he wanted to have a place for defibrillators.
If you look up and and I again I don't know what YouTube is is weird about right now. They they clearly don't want
us talking about this. We have to be extra cautious tonight.
But if you go and you look up on Google images defibrillator damage or CPR related injuries
where you can see where they put a paddle on somebody, it looks a lot like the picture that I showed. It looked a whole lot like the picture I showed.
Because where the paddle goes on you, there's no damage. But around the paddle, there are burn marks. Red, the
skin gets red and burned because you're you're putting a tremendous amount of electricity through the body. Where the paddles are
connected, it doesn't arc. It just goes right into the skin, but around it, you'll get these little arc burns all around it.
[snorts]
And that's what the damage looks like.