Part 2 Anti-Anti-Nazi Barbarian Hordes are Knocking Down ...

[admin]

Jewish Journalist EXPOSES Israel’s DARK SECRET History
Double Down News
Feb 20, 2025

Katie Halper is host of The Katie Halper Show



Transcript

There's literally nothing that Israel won't do in the name of Vengeance
and in the name of continuing Zionism.
For some people the takeaway is:
as long as they're not literally putting people in ovens
as long as they're not doing exactly what the Nazis did
that somehow that's okay, it's actually not okay.
Never Again doesn't mean:
Never Again in the exact same way that the Nazis did it,
if that's your take away from the Holocaust
you really need to look at yourself and do some soul searching.
I'm Jewish I lost members of my family during the Holocaust
and the truth is Israel does not represent me Israel does not make me safer
in fact it puts me and all Jews in greater danger.
Because as Israel commits these crimes against humanity
and live streams them and in some cases gleefully
live streams them we've seen soldiers doing this.
Israel doing that and saying it's in the name of Jews that will create anti-Semitism.
The idea that Israel represents all Jews is in itself an anti-semitic idea
the dual loyalty trope says that all Jews are monolith
and we're all loyal to Israel and we can't be trusted
to be loyal to other governments regardless of where we live.
That is really what Israel is leaning into and you have anti-semites
and then the government of Israel APAC and the ADL
all making the same argument which I think really shows you
the dangers and the inherent anti-Semitism of Zionism.
People like to claim that anti-zionism is anti-semitic
well it's actually not given that you literally have more
Christian Zionist in the world then you have Jewish Zionists.
This particular Christian form of Zionism wants Jews to go back to Israel
so we can provoke the end times, Armageddon.
All Jews except a very lucky 400 who accept Christ as their lord
and saviour burn for all of eternity so these are the Allies.
All these cancel culture warriors who talk about right-wingers being cancelled
are very silent interestingly enough when it comes to critics of Israel
who are probably the most canceled people of all.
If you're a Palestinian critic of Israel you're very, very, very canceled
if you're a Jewish critic of Israel you're less canceled but you're still canceled
you're just canceled as a self-loathing Jew
as opposed to an anti-semite which is a significant difference.
I mean I was fired by a network for saying that Israel is an apartheid state
so my being Jewish didn't really protect me.
And of course there's a huge bias in the way that corporate media reports on Israel Palestine
they're very clear when Russia does something Russia bombs Russia strikes Russia kills when it's
Israel it's often Palestinians killed in attack Palestinians dead after bombing we even know that
networks and Outlets instruct their writers and reporters not to use certain words like genocide
not even to use the word Palestine in fact the reporting by the New York Times on the alleged
Mass rape used by Hamas was so bad that they had to cancel a podcast that they were going to do
about it because there was so little to back it up now on the other hand you have countless stories
and allegations of Israelis raping Palestinians that got totally ignored it's really fascinating
that we hear time and time again about the 40 beheaded Israeli babies even though there was
no evidence of that and we do have evidence of actually beheaded babies children with their heads
blown off I mean we saw a child literally shredded various representatives of the Israeli government
are never asked about that they're never asked to condemn Israel's violence they're never asked to
condemn Israel's terrorist ISM there was a doctor who was tortured to death if you don't already
feel disturbed by the images of Palestinians or the stories of Palestinians the story of hin RAB
who was left in a car to die when she was begging for help and Israeli soldiers shot up the car and
shot up the ambulance trying to rescue this girl if that doesn't haunt you I would really
urge you to imagine this happening to a Jewish child during the Holocaust I think that Jews
should understand this if anything more than other people because of our history of being targeted of
being otherized of being compared to Vermin of attempted extermination of genocide and ethnic
cleansing and of the world looking the other way that is something that we have to remember that
happened to us we can't let that happen to other people that's not Justice that's not how we honor
those killed in the Holocaust everything that Israel tells you about its founding about its
history and about its role today is a lie some people think oh Israel was founded for Holocaust
Survivors and then it got greedy and took over too much land and and ruined its founding Mission
which was to be a safe haven for juice the truth is it was founded on ethnic cleansing it was not
a Utopia I think it's really eye openening to look at the actual language of early zionists because
they were calling their Banks Colonial trusts they were talking about how natives always resist
colonists in other words it's not just critics of Zionism who describe Zionism as Colonial
it was designs themselves Israeli Society really had a lot of disdain for Holocaust Survivors so
they did something very disgusting they both weaponized the Holocaust to justify their
extermination of Palestinians and they mistreated Holocaust survivors in fact they even refer to
them as sapon which means soap in Hebrew and that was because there was a myth that Nazis turned
Jewish bodies into soap it's not true but that was a myth and the important thing is that people
thought that was true and they thought it would be appropriate to call Survivors by that name Israel
wanted to create a new Jew that was armed that was working the land they were ashamed of the
Jews who were killed they thought that they went to their Slaughter like sheep they were ashamed
of Jews who were religious Jews who were Scholars Jews who were also Cosmopolitan they really did
ironically internalize a lot of anti-Semitism there were Zionist bombings in the Middle East
that were used to scare people into IM migrating out of Iraq out of Morocco and into Israel That's
how little they cared about Jewish people they bombed synagogues in order to get people to leave
the Middle East and go to Israel where they would be mistreated which is what happened to mrai Jews
some were basically put into camps they rejected Yiddish which was spoken by Eastern European
and diasporic Jews and they also rejected Arabic which was spoken by mrai Jews of the Middle East
Yiddish is an amazing language and it's dying out and the reason it's dying out is because
Israel chose to create modern Hebrew which no one spoke and they had a lot of disdain for a
lot of Jewish culture so Israel has always been a racist project in many ways against Palestinians
but even against Jews themselves and it's been an anti-semitic project as well not only is Judaism
obviously much older than Zionism but there was Christian Zionism from the very beginning and
that was fueled by anti-Semitism and the desire to get Jews out of Europe Lord Balor of the Bal
Declaration was a major anti-semite Zionism actually requires anti-Semitism to justify
its existence so for zionists they don't want to defeat anti-Semitism they want to use it
to strengthen the state of Israel it's also true to remember that this is not a conflict
about religion or culture Jews and Christians and Muslims lived in peace in Harmony in many
areas of the Middle East for centuries this is about power this is about land
this goes back to resources this goes back to the West wanting to have a foothold in the
Middle East this is not about religion Jewish anti-zionism has existed since Zionism a lot
of Jews opposed Zionism because they I would say rightly predicted it would create anti-Semitism
there is a very rich radical history of Jewish internationalism during the Spanish Civil War
which many people see as the dry run for World War II among all the international
Brigade so all the volunteers who left their countries to fight in a war against fascism the
most common language spoken was Yiddish which speaks to this tradition if we look at so many
struggles like the civil rights movement in the United States there were lots of Jews involved
in that Jewish people were over represented in that movement if you look at South Africa some
of the most active anti-apartheid activists were Jewish that's the tradition that I'm proud to be
part of not a tradition which weaponizes trauma tragedy and the Holocaust to kill more people
Israel is unsustainable there's no coming back from this something new needs to be created Jews
can live side by side with Muslims and Christians in Palestine just as they have for centuries if
coexistence is so impossible and if anti-Semitism is so impossible to fight against how is it that
Jews live in Germany today Germany was where anti-Semitism turned into the Holocaust cost
and yet somehow Jews are able to live in Germany in safety but we're supposed to believe that they
can't live in Palestine in safety Palestine is not the country that created Adolf Hitler Palestine is
not the country that created the Holocaust the biggest threat to Jewish safety is not
a free Palestine it's Zionism it's essential to challenge the lies and propaganda of mainstream
media you won't see videos like these in the mainstream media which is why it's so important
to support the work of double news on patreon and if I do say so myself the ktie Halper show

[admin]

MAGA Ballroom 2028: AI Unveils the Elite's Sinister Power Dance!
Salty Dawg Entertainment
Aug 8, 2025 BILOXI

Dive into the scathing satire of *MAGA Ballroom 2028*! This AI-crafted video rips the veil off the corrupt elite, exposing their grotesque waltz for power with unyielding clarity and precision. As you watch, you will witness a chilling portrayal of political decay that hits like a sledgehammer, leaving no room for denial or complacency. Each scene is designed to provoke thought and ignite conversation about the state of our political landscape. With sharp humor and biting commentary, this video calls out the absurdities and contradictions of those in power. Prepare yourself for a journey that is both entertaining and eye-opening.



Transcript

[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
person.
Everyone loves us.
They made us great.
We didn't deport them. We erased them.
[Music]
We made America great.
[Applause]
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
And that was the end of the first phase
of democracy as laid out by the founding
fathers and the beginning of the
healing.

[admin]

White House Makeover - SNL
Saturday Night Live
Nov 1, 2025 #SNL51 #BrandiCarlile #SNL

The Property Brothers (Miles Teller) help Donald and Melania Trump (James Austin Johnson, Chloe Fineman) renovate the White House.



Transcript

-This week on a very special
episode of "Property Brothers"...
-I'm Drew Scott and I'm a real-estate expert.
-I'm his twin brother, Jonathan, and I'm a contractor.
That means I find the perfect property.
-And I actually have to renovate the darn thing.
-This week we're taking on our biggest challenge yet.
-Building the new White House ballroom.
-Hi. You're Property Brothers. -Nice to meet you.
-So which one of you is married to New Girl
and which one of you is the gay? -I'm married to New Girl.
Donald and Melania moved into this house nine years ago.
They were evicted for four years,
but they moved back in.
-Donald has a strong eye for interior design.
-I put these gold urns everywhere,
like a hundred in every room, and that makes me happy.
It's very important to be happy these days.
Really dark stuff happening in the world.
Some of it me.
And here's a crown I just got from my trip to Asia.
Nothing says democracy like a crown, right?
-And his wife, Melania -- Well, she's got a style all her own.
I love these Halloween decorations you put up.
-Those are for Christmas. -Oh.
-The Trumps have already made
a few subtle changes to the house.
-Donald got rid of the portrait of FDR,
and he put a painting of himself as a soldier from "Halo."
-Learned his name is Master Chief.
You know, it's awful.
You can't even say Master Chief anymore, right?
You got to say primary chief.
-They also paved the Rose Garden
and turned it into what looks like outdoor seating
at an Olive Garden.
-But Donald and Melania still feel like something's missing.
-The house is only 55,000 square feet and 132 rooms.
-We need more space, right, honey? We need more space.
-And we need a ballroom because, Donald -- he loves to dance.
-I'm a terrific dancer, a terrific dancer.
Just ask your eyes. Right?
-We asked Donald what his budget was,
and he said between $350 million and infinity.
-And then we asked if he needed a permit,
and Donald laughed really hard.
-He said, "I could build this ballroom with the bones
of my enemies and no one could stop me."
-As opposed to a bonehead like my brother.
-Oh, you hush up.
-We showed Donald our plan for a ballroom
that would match the current proportions,
but he kept clicking enlarge.
I think it's now over the fence into the street.
-They can drive around it.
Oh, and I want a ring for MMA fights.
Official ones, but also casual fights in the backyard.
You know what I'm talking about?
Two mentally ill guys just wailing on each other.
We can do bum fights again.
Remember bum fights? We love bum fights.
-To nail down the style of the ballroom,
we asked Donald to come up with an inspo board.
-This kind of vibe and this guy's.
I don't know if you met him, but he's a great guy.
And then something like this could also be nice.
-I told Donald that our number-one
priority was to preserve the historic nature of the building,
and he sent me back this gif.
-So we demolished the entire East Wing in two days.
-With the government still shut down
and so many workers furloughed,
we were able to force park rangers and astronauts
to do a lot of the demolition.
-Are you sad to lose the historic presidential movie theater?
You know, Bill Clinton called it the best perk
of being president.
-Bill Clinton said that?
He said that the best perk for him was the movie theater?
-Unfortunately, the renovation hit a bit of a snag
when Donald realized he had deported all
the construction workers.
-I pulled into the Home Depot parking lot
and yelled, "Just give me the whites!"
You know, I want the day laborers from Norway and Sweden,
but apparently they don't exist. -But in the end,
we're confident the new ballroom will be a shining beacon
of freedom for all Americans.
-And it'll be ready just in time for my third term.
-That's right. We want this to be our forever home.
-Yes, because we're not leaving.
We're gonna be doing something called coup.
-And we'll make sure that Trump's dream becomes a reality.
If my dumb brother doesn't screw it up.
-Seriously, [bleep] you.
-Thank you so much.
-Okay, I guess the only thing left
is the payment for the construction.
-Aren't you guys from Canada? -Yeah.
-ICE! [ Doors slam open ]
There goes ICE. We like a bigot ICE.
-Spooky. -Very spooky.
It's a very spooky secret-police thing.
-"Property Brothers" -- only on HGTV and Truth Social.

[admin]

BREAKING: Judge drops NIGHTMARE ruling for Trump
Brian Tyler Cohen
Nov 9, 2025

Legal Breakdown episode 619: Trump loses troop deployment case on the merits



Transcript

You're watching the legal breakdown,
Glenn. We have some major news here. We
have been watching all of these troop
deployment cases play themselves out in
California, in Oregon, in Chicago,
Illinois, and so far all of the rulings
have been either a temporary restraining
orders or preliminary injunction. So, we
hadn't yet had a case where a judge had
ruled on the merits of Donald Trump's
troop deployments. We finally have a
ruling on the merits, this one out of
Portland. Can you explain what just
happened in court?
Yeah, Brian. Trump appointed judge Karen
Immergut held a trial, a three-day trial
with witnesses, law enforcement
witnesses who testified, federal law
enforcement, state law enforcement,
local law enforcement, hundreds of
documents uh received into evidence. And
she just ruled that Donald Trump
violated federal law. For anybody
scoring at home, 10 USC section 12406.
He violated the 10th amendment to the
Constitution by trying to deploy streets
to Portland, Oregon. And she permanently
enjoined him, prohibited him from
deploying National Guard troops to the
streets of Portland or frankly anywhere
in the state of Oregon. This is now set
in stone. It's a permanent injunction,
meaning it will last for the entire life
of the case unless and until a higher
court decides to reverse it. Yeah. So
now, Brian, this is a permanent
injunction, a permanent prohibition, you
know, preventing Donald Trump from
deploying uh National Guard troops not
only to the streets of Portland, but
anywhere in the state of Oregon. So now
this will remain in place of course
unless and until a higher court of
appeals including the Supreme Court
decides they don't like that ruling and
decides to try to reverse it.
Glenn, does this mark something of of a
paradigm shift in that we've seen so
many judges offer up deference to this
administration, offer up the presumption
of regularity? Was there anything that
Judge Ergot said that that could lend
itself to this idea that finally judges
are waking up, wising up to the fact
that this administration is not acting
in good faith and in fact will weaponize
the law to help themselves?
Yeah, it's a great question because she
not only ruled that he violated federal
law and that he violated the 10th
amendment to the constitution which
separates the states rights from the
federal government's rights. And she
said, "He so clearly and unlawfully,
unconstitutionally stepped over that
line and interfered in the state's right
to run its own National Guard troops."
She not only ruled that it was unlawful
and unconstitutional, but she really
condemned it and she highlighted the
danger of this kind of conduct by a
president of the United States. Let me
read one short paragraph because I have
to tell you it kind of sings. You know,
Judge Imrat is completely unflinching in
the face of Trump's lawlessness. She
says this court acknowledges that some
citizens may support these deployments
as a helpful military supplement to
effectuate the president's immigration
agenda. But the founders embodied their
profound fear and distrust of military
power in the Constitution and its
amendments, which has lived on through
the decades as a traditional and strong
resistance of Americans to any military
intrusion into civilian affairs. In the
Supreme Court's words, even slight
encroachments create new boundaries from
which legions of power can seek new
territory to capture. That is pretty
strong language when she is suggesting
that you know if we ignore the
separation of powers between the federal
government and the states rights you
know there may be new territory that is
captured by inference by Donald Trump
and his lawlessness. She says this
principle has been foundational to the
safeguarding of our fundamental
liberties under the constitution. So,
you know, it just shows that the federal
judges, Brian, including Trump appointed
judges, are unflinching in the face of
Trump's lawlessness and
unconstitutionality.
All right. So, Glenn, we had talked
about the fact that, you know, initially
we had only seen temporary restraining
orders or preliminary injunctions, and
all of the appeals even in the seventh
circuit, even in the Ninth Circuit were
all appeals on those preliminary
injunctions and temporary restraining
orders. And we hadn't yet had a case on
the merits. So, the fact that we have
the first ruling on the merits and it's
against the Trump administration, what
kind of an impact does this have on two
things, the ongoing cases also in LA and
in Chicago, but also the inevitable
appeal up to the Supreme Court?
You know, I don't want to overstate the
sort of atmospheric precedent that this
might set for other jurisdictions where
Trump tries to pull the same
unconstitutional
And the reason I say I I don't
want to be too, you know, broad in
applying this elsewhere is because Judge
Immigr,
you know, she was dealing with was there
was like one block where there was an
ICE facility and back in June there were
some incidents of violence, but really
since then there have it's been
relatively violence-free. She even said,
you know, some of the information
suggests that, yeah, there are still
some dustups around that building in
that oneb block area, but she said, you
know, the dustups are between often
protesters and counterprotesters, and
they're easily handled by kind of
regular civilian law enforcement forces.
So, you know, it's an important
pronouncement and I love some of the
language she used about the danger of
not addressing a violation of the
state's rights by the federal
government. However, it really is
largely bound to the facts as they were
established in the trial that she
conducted. So, you know, there's there's
a little bit of something there for
everybody. the people who would like to
say, "Listen, this should kind of settle
it nationwide." Well, yes and no.
Because it's really ultimately only
settling the circumstances that she
found pursuant to the litigation that
she conducted on on this issue.
Is there any indication from the Trump
team yet whether they're going to
appeal?
Not that I've heard yet. This is a brand
new ruling uh that just came down from
Judge Immigr. When has the Trump
administration not appealed something
that has gone against him?
Well, the reason I asked that though
there there there may be some concern
recognizing that the seventh circuit is
not necessarily uh some, you know, this
is not uh the 11th circuit. It's not
some big conservative bastion. And so,
is there some concern that if they do
appeal a ruling where they lost on the
merits, it's not uh precedent because
it's the trial court, but once it gets
into the appeals court level, then it
does become precedent. And so could that
be any concern or any reason for the
Trump administration maybe to reconsider
uh immediately running up to the uh
appeals court?
Yeah, Brian, there's so many moving
pieces in multiple jurisdictions. You
know, our viewers will probably recall
that there was litigation over Trump's
attempted deployment of National Guard
troops to Chicago. Now, that is on hold
and that's still kind of kicking around
in the seventh circuit court of appeals,
but Donald Trump is trying to bubble
that one up to the Supreme Court. Out in
the Ninth Circuit, which includes both
Oregon and California, um there is some
litigation kicking around, but here's
what I can almost promise. Um not that
I'm happy about it. I think all of these
matters are going to be consolidated.
They're all going to be taken up by the
Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court
will want to announce sort of one
principle, one interpretation of the law
and the Constitution when it comes to
Trump's ability, his authority to
deploy, federalize, and deploy National
Guard troops. And then they will return
it to the various states and the lower
federal courts to implement whatever it
is the Supreme Court comes up with. If I
had to bet my one one buck, which is my
betting limit, it will probably involve
an expansion of presidential power, I'm
just going to take a flyer that that's
what the Supreme Court might do again.
But ultimately, all of this, I'm not
going to say is for not, but it's all
going to make its way up and be
consolidated and decided by the Supreme
Court.
And that was going to be my next
question here. To what extent do you
think that this Supreme Court is even
going to care about any president,
whether it's a president from a trial
court or even precedent from appeals
courts? Well, you know, they have shown
really extreme disrespect for federal
trial court judges and federal courts of
appeals when they put out 100 160 in
some instances page opinions that
meticulously detail all of the precedent
involved, including Supreme Court
president. And you know, the the radical
right-wing majority of the Supreme Court
seems forever determined to throw it all
out without saying why in these shadow
docket decisions and expand presidential
power. Listen, if they found
presidential immunity in the
Constitution, even though the express
terms of the Constitution in a couple of
ways um disallow for presidential
immunity, why do we think they would do
anything but expand presidential power
in the military arena when they have
already said, listen, that's one of the
core constitutional functions of a
president pres of a president that
nobody can touch. So, you know, I'm not
wildly optimistic that we're going to
get a good sort of democracy saving
opinion out of the Supreme Court on this
one.
To that end, what kind of an impact does
this ruling by Judge Immigr have for
you? Like, like does the fact that we
did see a trial court rule on the merits
against Trump's completely baseless
troop deployment? Because remember,
there is no there is no foreign
invasion, there is no insurrection, and
there is no failure of the local
government to effectuate its laws. And
so none of the planks uh that would have
that would have um that would have
facilitated the deployment of troops
domestically were met and and this judge
recognized that and ruled accordingly.
So does that hold any weight for you at
least as you think about the judiciary
kind of holding itself up as a bull work
against Trump? you know, um, generally
the way I look at it is pressure bursts
pipes. And I think there is a certain
pressure generated by federal trial
court judges, particularly ones
appointed by Trump and there are a
number of judges appointed by President
Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush, George W.
Bush who have pretty consistently and
vocally ruled against Donald Trump's
lawlessness, unconstitutionality,
and general abuse of power. All of that
should generate pressure. Now, whether
there is any pressure felt by the
Supreme Court, given that they are above
the law, they have no mandatory code of
ethics. They're the only nine federal
government employees who operate in an
ethics-free zone. They can do whatever
they damn well. Please. I don't know
that they feel the pressure, but I do
think it generates pressure that may be
sort of felt by politicians. It may may
be felt by the American people. When
they see these federal court judges
standing up, doing the right thing,
protecting democracy, abiding by the
rule of law and the constitution, it
becomes a powerful expectation that that
is the way, you know, a democracy is
supposed to operate. So, you know, I
still think it generates pressure. I
just don't know if that pressure bubbles
all the way up to the Supreme Court,
which is really where it needs to be
felt the most because all of the lower
court opinions in the world, no matter
how loyal they are to the Constitution
and the rule of law can be tossed out on
a whim by, you know, the a majority of
the Supreme Court justices.
All right. Well, obviously this is a
story that continues to develop here as
we await an inevitable appeal both to
the circuit court and then the US
Supreme Court. And we're also waiting on
some rulings here in Los Angeles and
Chicago uh on the same issue. And I'm
sure Donald Trump is going to continue
to flex his autocratic muscles and try
and deploy troops to other cities. And
so there's a lot happening right here.
So for those who are watching, if you
want to follow along, please make sure
to subscribe. I'm going to put the links
to both of our channels right here on
the screen. It's the best way to support
our work. It is completely free and it's
a great way to support independent
media. So, if you're not yet subscribed,
please go ahead and subscribe. I'm Brian
Tyler Cohen
and I'm Glenn Kersner.
You're watching the Legal Breakdown.

**************

US Judge permanently blocks National Guard deployment in Portland for ICE protests
by: Jenna Deml, Joelle Jones
koin.com
Posted: Nov 7, 2025 / 09:10 AM PST
Updated: Nov 7, 2025 / 06:30 PM PST
https://www.koin.com/news/portland/imme ... 11-7-2025/

ORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — After granting a preliminary injunction barring any troop deployment in Portland, U.S. Judge Karin Immergut ruled Friday to permanently extend the order, noting any state’s National Guard cannot be sent to Oregon.

Coming right up to the point the injunction was set to expire, Judge Immergut also granted a stay for a period of 14 days on troops who had already been federalized, but not deployed.

Oregonians begin receiving SNAP benefits Friday morning

“Today’s ruling is a huge victory for Oregon. The courts are holding this administration accountable to the truth and the rule of law,” Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a statement Friday evening. “From the beginning, this case has been about making sure that facts, not political whims, guide how the law is applied. Today’s decision protects that principle.”

Immergut, a Trump appointee, presided over a three-day trial earlier last week. She previously issued two temporary restraining orders in the case, blocking the troops pending further litigation.

Judge Immergut has been involved in this case since September, when Oregon first sued to block the Trump administration from federalizing the National Guard.

According to Professor Tung Yin with Lewis & Clark Law School, her preliminary injunction order indicated she would side with the State of Oregon in the final ruling, as she repeatedly cited the “irreparable harm” Oregon would suffer if the troops were deployed in violation of the Tenth Amendment.

“Who does she believe? From the preliminary injunction order, it seems like she really believes much more of what the Portland Police Bureau officers had to say and other local officials, than she believed what ICE agents and others were saying,” said Professor Tung Yin with Lewis & Clark Law School.

DHS fast-tracks new rules governing masks and violence near federal facilities
Immergut also previously took issue with the Trump Administration’s use of the word “rebellion” to characterize the need to send troops to Portland.

In early October, Judge Immergut ruled in favor of the Oregon’s proposed restraining order, saying the relatively small protests in Portland did not justify the use of federalized forces. She also said allowing the deployment would harm Oregon’s state sovereignty.

When President Trump then attempted to deploy troops from California and Texas, Oregon leaders filed another restraining order that was also approved by Immergut.

However, the Trump Administration’s appeal for the first case was won in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Oregon. Federal attorneys then filed the motion to dissolve the second TRO on the same basis. This gave way to Sunday’s granting of the preliminary injunction.

Awaiting her decision, a handful of demonstrators gathered outside the Portland ICE facility on Friday to make their voices heard. This was a peaceful scene compared to the larger protests that prompted federal action in September.

“He’s saying we’re burning down. I mean, look around. It’s a beautiful day in Portland, right in front of the ICE Facility, and everything’s fine,” protester Mike “The Clown” told KOIN 6 News. “People are driving by, going to work. There’s no need for troops here –and those are our troops. We pay for them, our tax dollars!”

Since Judge Immergut sided with the state, Professor Yin noted he expects the losing side will appeal to the 9th Circuit Court regardless.

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson released the following statement in response to the ruling:

“As I have said from the beginning, the number of federal troops needed in our city is zero, and today’s court ruling vindicates Portland’s position while reaffirming the rule of law that protects our community. Portland values the Constitutional right to free speech, and we will defend those rights. We will continue fighting in court and working with state and community partners to ensure public safety, protect civil rights, and stand up for our immigrant community.”

[admin]

Tucker Carlson on Why He Interviewed Nick Fuentes and What He Wanted to Convey To Him
Megyn Kelly
Nov 6, 2025

Megyn Kelly is joined by Tucker Carlson to discuss his decision to interview Nick Fuentes, why he speaks with controversial figures to understand their thinking, what he wanted to convey to Fuentes, what he thought of him after, and more.



*********************