Part 2 Anti-Anti-Nazi Barbarian Hordes are Knocking Down ...

[admin]

Spain EXPLODES! Israeli CONSULATE SET ABLAZE in Spain after IDF Drops 153-TON Bomb on Gaza!
Openminded Reporter
Oct 21, 2025 #OpenmindedThinkerShow #GazaGenocide #BoycottIsrael

Europe has had enough — from Italy to the UK, from Greece to Malta, the tide is turning against Israel’s toxic influence in sport and politics, and now Maccabi Tel Aviv, once Israel’s football pride, is being humiliated across the continent, banned fans, burning outrage, and a wave of disgust following every game, this isn’t just about football anymore it’s about justice and accountability for the crimes in Gaza, as nations reject the normalization of genocide on and off the pitch.

In this video we break down the shocking rise of protests against Maccabi Tel Aviv across Europe, from violent fan behavior in Amsterdam to mass boycotts in Italy and police bans in Birmingham, we expose how Israeli football has become a propaganda weapon for a regime accused of war crimes, and how leaders like Keir Starmer are failing miserably to uphold basic moral standards, while hiding behind political correctness and empty talk of antisemitism.

We connect the dots between Israel’s actions in Gaza and the growing European backlash that has forced UEFA to relocate games, cancel fixtures, and issue unprecedented warnings, with activists and football associations across Norway, Greece, and Malta saying no more, as Palestine calls for Israel’s suspension from FIFA just like Russia was banned after invading Ukraine.

Watch till the end to see how the hypocrisy of Western politics is unraveling, why Israeli teams can’t hide from accountability forever, and how this European revolt is reshaping the global sports landscape — football is no longer just a game when it’s soaked in the blood of Gaza’s children, this is a call for truth, justice, and moral courage



Transcript

That was what the 153 pound bombs looked
like in Gaza despite a ceasefire.
Continued violations by Israel have led
to the deaths of over 100 Palestinians.
These include people killed as a result
of their lack of awareness of the
boundaries demarcating the so-called
yellow line, only visible on military
maps. Others were killed directly by
Israeli fire in what it claimed was a
Gaza violation, which eventually turned
out to be a deliberate explosion by the
IDF itself so that it could attack Gaza.
[Music]
There were a total of 25 air strikes in
just 6 hours, making it an intense
aerial combat aimed principally from my
perspective at strike areas protected by
Gaza defenders which they had observed
following the lull in the ceasefire.
That was a classic one. Wanted criminal
Benjamin Netanyahu sacrificed the two
soldiers that died in order to carry out
his malicious strikes to destroy the
Gaza tunnel where Israeli prisoners of
war were detained. And to achieve this,
the IDF utilized a 153 pound bomb. And
that's the major kernel of my report
today.
After this announcement by the fugitive
criminals, Spain erupted in massive
righteous protests condemning the
Zionist regime's brutal and genocidal
onslaught in Gaza, peaking with a
nationwide general strike on October
15th, spearheaded by courageous labor
unions student activists who refused to
tolerate Israel's ongoing atrocities
amid a sham ceasefire that does nothing
to halt the slaughter. Tens of thousands
of outraged citizens flooded the streets
of Madrid, Barcelona, and Valencia,
echoing thunderous chants like, "Stop
everything to stop the genocide," while
demanding that the Spanish government
immediately cut all economic and
diplomatic ties with the apartheid
state, enforce crippling sanctions, and
open vital humanitarian aid routes to
aid the besieged Palestinians. In
Madrid, around 15,000 defiant youth
marched from Atosha to Puerto del Soul
and Barcelona swelled with up to 300,000
protesters by organizers counts,
grinding transportation, schools, and
public services to a halt in a bold act
of solidarity that exposes the world's
complicity in Israel's 2-year reign of
terror and its catastrophic toll on
innocent lives. Backed by over 200
unions, this strike rejects the fragile
truce as a mere facade, fiercely calling
for true accountability and a genuine
just peace that dismantles the
oppressive roots of Zionist aggression.
Boycott were added to the mix. Like and
share this video to help spread the
truth. Mainstream media is silent on the
anti-Israel strikes and the massive
protests happening in Spain. Subscribe
to help amplify our reach and stay tuned
for more. Today we take a crucial step
forward in calling for a two-state
solution at this conference. But let us
be lucidly clear. There is no solution
possible when the population of one of
those two states is the victim of a
genocide. We are all well aware that the
only hope that civilians in Gaza have is
that of knowing that the world does not
forget them. And this conference
nurtures that hope. It is an act of
moral rebellion and uprising against
indifference and forgetfulness. Let us
make this conference too a collective
commitment to haltering brutality and to
paving the way for peace. Excellence
excellencies, this conference marks a
monumental step forward, but it is not
the end of the road. It is it only is
and can only be the beginning. As such,
I want to make two proposals. First, the
state of Palestine must be a
fullyfledged member of the United
Nations. As soon as possible, we must
conclude the procedure to admit the
state of Palestine to this organization
on an equal footing with the rest of
states herein. Secondly, we have to
immediately adopt measures to halt the
brutality and make peace possible.
Spain,
of course, will adopt a plan with
measures to halt the genocide in Gaza.
We will continue to take brave measures
shoulder-to-shoulder with anyone who
wishes to join us because Gaza needs it.
Excellencies, history will judge us and
its verdict will be brutal with those
that perpetrated this slaughter and with
those who remain silent or turned a
blind eye.
Some breaking news to bring you now.
Nestle, who I'm sure you've heard of
because they make Kit Kat and Nest Cafe
and Nespresso and lots of other things,
has announced it's going to cut around
16,000 jobs globally over the next uh 2
years. Why does it matter here in the
UK? Because plenty of people in the UK
work at Nestle, make uh confectionary
and Halifax and lots of things in in
York and Gatwick's the HQ and cereals
are made in Wellin and in Ireland as
well. Dublin has an HQ as well. Govern
in Scotland makes confeure. A lot of
people work for Nestle here in the UK.
We don't know where these job cuts are
coming exactly, but some 16,000 jobs are
going globally. This is according to
Philip Navertil, who's Nestle's fairly
new chief executive, saying the world is
changing and Nestle needs to change
faster. And that is going to culminate
over the next two years in 16,000 jobs
going around the world, potentially in
the UK. We have no detail on that as
yet. That's going to make a lot of
people uh at those places Staverton
Wellin uh Ger and I mentioned Bramber on
the world as well rather nervous.
As if that weren't enough earlier this
month the Pedro Sanchez government
passed a law through the Spanish
Parliament imposing an arms embargo on
Israel. Spain has also been a leading
voice in preventing the wanted criminal
Netanyahu from traveling freely across
Europe on his way to the United States.
So the for the end goal, the actual
establishment of a Palestinian state
living side by side with a secure
Israel. To get that, you're going to
have to keep up the pressure on the
Israeli government. Justin Trudeau said
that Canada would honor the
International Criminal Court arrest
warrants, i.e. Benjamin Netanyahu would
be arrested if he came to Canada. Does
that stand under your leadership?
Yes.
You'd be prepared to do that?
Yes. Meanwhile, Candace Owens has issued
a warning to those who continue to
support Zionism.
Now, to be clear, I am consistent on all
matters. I do not want America involved
whatsoever in anything that is happening
in Israel. I don't want my dollars sent
over to Israel. We should not be
supporting Israel. Um, obviously, Thomas
Massie has done a lot of work showing
how it doesn't even make economic sense
that we have so much debt and yet we're
sending money over to support Israel.
And the biggest issue, by the way, that
I have with Israel and talking about
them being above reproach is the fact
that they are supplying the arms to
murder Christians, okay? In Armenia, the
oldest Christian country in the world.
And yet, nobody talks about that. For
whatever reason, it seems to be the
circumstance that when Jewish people die
in Israel, it's wall-to-wall coverage.
But when Christians die all over the
world, nobody talks about it. Everyone
wants to correlate everything to World
War II. Everyone wants to talk about
Adolf Hitler and the and rightfully so.
He was a horrific person, but nobody
wants to talk about Henrik Yagod, right?
Nobody wants to talk about the
Bolsheviks. Nobody wants to talk about
the Christian Holocaust. I am tired of
the media exhausted of the media not
speaking about what is happening to
Christians all around the world. And it
is especially horrific while at the
exact same time that it is happening,
the slaughter of Christians in Armenia,
the arms being supplied by Israel that
the media turns the other way and says,
"Oh, okay, but what about is what about
what's happening in Israel?" So, you
know what I'm asking for? Actual
equality. Okay? Because it seems like
this is like a special category, the
special relationship that we have. I'm a
Christian first. Okay? And so my
concerns are going to be with what's
happening to Christians all around the
world because it is us. We are the
number one most persecuted religion in
the world.
The fury has only intensified post
strike, boiling over into fierce clashes
that underscore an unbreakable resolve
against Israeli imperialism. As of
October 19th in Barcelona, explosive
confrontations ignited outside the
Israeli consulate where valiant masked
demonstrators struck at complicit
businesses backing the occupiers,
smashing stores, banks, and offices in a
raw outcry against the regime's support
network, resulting in arrests and police
repression with tear gas. Comparable
chaos erupted at a Euro Cup basketball
match featuring an Israeli team as
protesters pushed for boycots and
lambasted the barbaric savagery in Gaza,
ignoring union critiques and defying
backlash for persisting through
so-called peace overtures that mask
continued oppression. Throughout Spain,
this surging movement commands global
scrutiny with unbreakable vows from
activists that the fight endures until
the Zionist entity is held accountable,
fueling urgent worldwide demands to
combat what they rightly label as ethnic
cleansing, deliberate starvation, and
unyielding war crimes, even as token aid
trickles into the ravaged strip. Thank
you so much for getting to this side of
things. Remember to never forget to
support my work by subscribing to the
channel. This way we can reach more
people and fight the YouTube censorship.
And until we meet next time, God bless

[admin]

President Trump Participates in a Troop Visit and Remarks on the USS George Washington
The White House
Oct 28, 2025



Transcript

Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
♪ ("God bless the USA" by Lee Greenwood) ♪
The President: What a group, what a group, all champions.
(audience chanting "USA")
The President: Well, thank you very much. A big hello. This is a special group of Patriots, champions, winners.
You are winners, I'd love to have your job. I'd love to have your job.
And a very special hello to the greatest sailors anywhere in the seas, the incredible men and women of the United States Navy.
Very special people, thank you very much. It's a great honor. Great honor to be here.
But I'm thrilled to be here among thousands of proud American Patriots aboard the 100,000 tons.
That's a lot of tonnage. Forward deployed, symbol of American might power and prestige,
the legendary USS George Washington. This is some ship.
They don't make them this way anymore, but we're not supposed to say that, but they really don't.
This is great stuff. This is really an incredible GW, they call it
GW, right? And we've come this afternoon to celebrate the strength
and the skill and service of everyone on this ship. So, we're going to all relax. We're going to have a good time.
We're not going anywhere. If you go back to Washington, it's like two o'clock in the morning.
But I want to just tell you that you are special people, and we're going to have a little fun. And I'm going to tell you how great our country is
and how well we're doing. Because a year and a half ago we had a different country than we do right now. Now we're the most respected country in the world.
We're the hottest country anywhere in the world, and it hasn't taken too long. But I had no doubt,
I just didn't know we were going to do it this fast. We've done it fast because of people like you. So, I want to thank you very much
and I want to recognize a man that you all know well. And he's a tough cookie.
Was formerly our Secretary of Defense, but now he's proudly known as our Secretary of War,
Pete Hegseth.
And you know why I pay this, he gave up a hell of a job. They were going to pay millions of dollars.
They didn't want him to leave, that crazy fox didn't want him to leave, but he wanted.
Every time he'd go on that show, all he wanted to talk about is the military. And I said, "If I ever do this,
I'm going to bring this guy along with me. He knew more about it than anybody. He didn't want to be doing the other stuff." And he had a chance.
He could have so much money he wouldn't have known. He didn't want that. This is what you wanted, Pete. He's so happy now.
Those drug ships aren't coming in anymore. We can't find a ship. There's no ships coming in with drugs.
It's like he's been incredible. So thank you very much, Pete. You gave up a lot. We appreciate it. Thank you.
And unlike past administrations we will not be politically correct.
You don't mind that, do you? When it comes to defending the United States, we're no longer politically correct.
We're going to defend our country any way we have to. And that's usually not the politically correct way.
From now on, if we're in a war, we're going to win the war. We're going to win it like nobody ever before.
We'd go in, we'd blast the hell out of countries. Shouldn't have gone in. By the way, if you don't go in, that's even better.
We don't have to go in, peace through strength. But we'd go in, we'd win, and then we'd leave.
They used to say, "To the victor belong to spoils." Well, we'd be the victor that would leave, because we had people that didn't know
what the hell they were doing. But we're also very honored to be joined by hundreds of our incredible Japanese partners.
And they are incredible. Thank you very much.
This woman. That's right. This woman is a winner.
So, we've become very close friends all of a sudden, because their stock market today
and our stock market today hit an all time high.
That means we're doing something right. But the cherished alliance between the United States and Japan
is one of the most remarkable relationships in the entire world. Really, there's never been anything like it.
Born out of the ashes of a terrible war, our bond has grown over eight decades
into the beautiful friendship that we have. It's a foundation of peace and security in the Pacific.
You see it? So, on behalf of all American sailors stationed in this beautiful country,
let's hear it for our allies and the Japanese self-defense forces and all of the Japanese people that we love and respect.
And I have such respect for Japan and the country. And now I have a really great respect for the new and incredible prime minister.
And I have to say this, the first female prime minister in the history of Japan,
Madam Prime Minister, please, say a few words.
Madam Prime Minister: Thank you, Mr. President, and thank you all.
This year marks the. U.S. Navy's semi-queen centennial anniversary.
As we celebrate the important milestone, I'm truly honored to have this opportunity
to deliver remarks with President Trump aboard the aircraft carrier USS George Washington,
a symbol of protecting freedom and peace in this region.
First and foremost, I would like to express my deep respect and sincere gratitude to all the men and women in uniform.
From Japan's Self-Defense forces and the U.S. forces Japan for your dedication
and commitment to safeguard peace and security of our nation and the region, day and night.
Six years ago, at this same place here in Yokosuka City,
the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Trump stood side by side
and demonstrated their resolve that Japan and the United States would join hands
to ensure peace and security in this region.
Now, as the two Commanders-in-Chief of Japan and the United States stand together once again,
I have renewed my determination to carry forward that resolve, and to make the Indo-Pacific free and open
so that it will serve as the foundation of peace and prosperity for the entire region.
Now we are facing an unprecedented severe security environment.
Peace cannot be preserved by words alone. It can be protected only when there is
an unwavering determination and action.
From where we stand, we can see Maritime Self-Defense Forces Mogami and Maya.
Vessels of Japan's Maritime Self-Defense force and USS George Washington
have conducted numerous joint exercises. Just as importantly, there are so many Japanese
and American personnel working for logistics and maintenance here in Yokosuka.
And there's also a strong sense of bond with the local community here.
Those are what have been supporting the activities of the U.S. Navy over the years.
There's no doubt that such multi-layered Japan- U.S. cooperation is what makes this possible for us
to ensure the credibility of our two nations' deterrence and response capabilities.
Let me reiterate my unwavering determination here. Japan is committed to fundamentally reinforce
its defense capabilities, and Japan is ready to contribute even more proactively to peace and stability of the region.
Through these efforts together with President Trump, I am determined to elevate the Japan-U. S.
Alliance, which has already become the greatest alliance in the world to even greater, greater heights.
Japan and the United States will advance together with our sails raised high across a free and open sea.
And I am very confident that the sea route from Yokosuka will make our bond even stronger and stronger,
and bring our two nations on the path to a shining future.
Thank you. (applause)
The President: Thank you very much. And we will have a long, good relationship,
and we'll have fun doing it. You have to have fun, although sometimes it's never fun. She's tough to negotiate with, I want to tell you.
But I'm delighted to report that I've just approved the first batch of missiles.
You saw a couple of them coming down with me. I hugged them. We need them. They're the best in the world.
Nobody has them like we have them. They all want our missiles. That's the problem. Everybody wants them, but it's the first batch of missiles
to be delivered to the Japanese Self-Defense Forces for Japan's F-35s,
and they're coming this week, so they're ahead of schedule. I just want to tell Madam Prime Minister,
they've been waiting for those missiles and we got them here right away, as soon as I heard about it. I want to thank Former Senator, a great gentleman, by the way.
He was so popular, but I took him out and I made him Secretary of State. I think he was born for it, Marco Rubio.
Thank you very much, Marco. Where are you, Marco? Great job. Great job. He was born for it.
Ambassador George Glass. Thank you very much, George. Good job you're doing. Thank you.
And many of our outstanding uniform leaders with us today, including the head of the Indo-Pacific Command,
Admiral Samuel Paparo. Where is Samuel? Hello. Good, but he's a good-looking people.
You could make a movie with these guys. They're like central -- Look at this group of people.
Commander of the U.S. Forces, Japan General Stephen Jost. Thank you, Stephen. Thank you very much.
The commander of the seventh -- Oh, that's a big deal. Do you want to switch jobs for one week?
Only for one week. All right. Seventh Fleet, big stuff, Vice Admiral Fred Kacher.
Fred, thank you very much. Thanks Greg. And the commander of Carrier Strike Group
Five, Rear Admiral, Eric "Pappy" Anduze.
Hello Pappy. That's great. Good. Thank you very much.
And of course, we can't forget about your command triad aboard the George Washington. There's nothing like this one.
This is a beauty and I hear your commanding officer's a big Alabama football fan. I love Alabama. I love Alabama. Captain Timothy
Waits and let me just say roll tide. I love Alabama. Roll tide.
Where's Timothy? Where's Timothy? That was a hell of a game this week.
I don't know how hell you pull that one out. If you didn't win, I wouldn't have mentioned it. I would've just introduced you. But you came back from oblivion.
Isn't it nice coming back? Coming back is good. Thanks as well to your Exo Captain Patrick
Blind. Where is he? Patrick. Patrick, thank you. Highly respected person.
All of these people are the best. Look at them. You look at them, they could have any job they wanted.
They could walk down to Wall Street, make a fortune. They wouldn't do that. They like what they're doing and nobody does it better as well as really
one of the most important people on the ship. Have you ever heard of Command Master Chief
Tony Roberts? Have you ever heard of him?
Wherever you are. Where's Tony? Thank you.
Thank you, Tony. He's a popular guy. And as many of you know, this month we're celebrating
a truly momentous anniversary, 250 years of courage and pride, honor and victory
by the United States Navy. 250 years, can you imagine?
And three weeks ago, Melania and I flew to Naval Station, Norfolk, I think many of you probably know that,
and witnessed an unforgettable display of pure American dominance, I'd say.
It was incredible to watch. They gave us some -- Then I said, "Slow it down. It costs a lot of money. Let's save it. Let's relax a little bit."
They gave us some great display from the thunderous roar of the guided missile, destroyers.
Never saw anything like it to the spectacular side of nuclear submarines all over the place, to the unstoppable force
of another great American aircraft carrier. One thing was clear that no enemy
will ever even dream of threatening America's Navy. There's no Navy even close, not even close.
You hear about some of them doing ships, but nobody can do what we do. Nobody has what we have and we also have the best equipment
that rides along in those ships. You see that? Nobody makes equipment like we do.
Nobody makes the ammunition, the weapons, the missiles, the planes, none of it. And if they do,
the American sailor stands ready to crush them and sink them and wreck them and blast them into oblivion.
And that's a terrible statement for me to make. That's the end of it because everybody said that I should immediately get the Nobel Peace Award.
With that statement, that takes me out of the running, but that's the way it is.
United States is blessed with the strongest and most powerful military in the history of the world.
There's no military like our military, not even close. Nobody has our weapons and it'll be stronger
and more powerful than ever before very soon. We just approved the biggest budget in the history,
over a trillion dollars, over a trillion dollars. We have the best ships, the best airplanes,
the best submarines, the best technology, but above all, we have America's military, it's the best people.
It's all about the people, ultimately. You have to work all of that fancy stuff that we make better than anybody else.
The fact is, we do make best weapons, but if you don't have the right people to operate those weapons,
they don't mean much. Despite that, as commander-in-chief, I never forget that our ultimate strength
does not come from equipment, it comes from the men and women of the rank and file.
That's true. It comes from you people, incredible people, good-looking people, too many good-looking people.
I don't like good-looking people. I never liked good-looking people, I'll be honest with you.
I've never admitted that before. But see, I'm allowed to -- See, we wanted the Supreme Court to think based on merit.
You know about that, right? Merit. Everything now in our country is based on merit
and that's why I look at you and I see nothing but merit. It's great to have a country back
where we can go by merit now, we don't go by anything else except for talent and work and hard work
and it's such a big win. That was such one of the most important wins and the will, patriotism and spirit in your hearts
is our single greatest weapon. The strength that you have is unbelievable. That's why as we make a record investment in our military,
we've never spent so much and we've never spent it more wisely because now we watch it, we spend it properly.
I'm also supporting an across the board pay raise for every sailor and service member in the United States Armed forces.
Now, if you don't want it, you want to give back to your country, just let us know, we won't give it to you.
Is there anybody in that category? But now all we really have to do is get the Democrats
to approve it, but they'll come along. They always do. They always do.
And because they heard that the sailors on the George Washington took a hit to your family separation pay.
You know what I'm talking about, right? You took a little hit to be here. By returning to the port,
you returned early for this event. I am delighted to announce that as your -- It's not a boss.
I don't feel like your boss, but I guess I am. At least you'll be happy about this one, my direction,
we're going to make sure that you received the full amount that you were owed for the deployment.
And we're not going to deduct anything because you came in to listen to your commander.
I'd like to be an admiral. I always wanted to be an admiral, to be honest. Don't tell the people that I love so much.
They sit around the table, they have all those beautiful stars and stripes. But I'll tell you what I love, I always love the admirals.
I love those uniforms and I look at these guys. I don't think I would've done very well if I had to compete with these people, they're too good.
But I always felt that the Navy is a very special group of people and I see it when I see you, I see it.
Over the past 11 months, the spirit of our military has been soaring like never before you, you know that.
The spirit of our country has been soaring. After years of recruiting shortages and we had bad ones,
it was embarrassing frankly. During my campaign, before the election, November 5th, after that, it all changed.
After we won, it all changed. And now we have waiting lists with record numbers,
trying to join the U.S. Navy. In all of the Armed Forces we have literal waiting lists, and I'm pleased to report that 2025
was the Navy's single best recruiting year in many generations. That's pretty good, isn't it?
But think of it, it seems like I've been up here so long and it seems like I've been doing this for a long time
and we had a great first term, but nothing like what's happening now.
We have the greatest economy in the history of our country. I rebuilt the military in the first term and then they gave a lot of it away to Afghanistan,
but it was really just a tiny speck. But it was the concept of what it was. But we rebuilt the military
and we did so many things in the first term, but we're blowing it away right now. But think of it, just one year ago
I was in the middle of a campaign. Can you believe that? It doesn't feel that way. I said, you're right, it's not November 5th yet.
We have another week or so to go. I was campaigning one year ago
and look at all the things that we've done since this unbelievable day, November 5th.
That's when it all changed. When we won on November 5th, it all changed. And we went from a country that wasn't respected
and a lot of people that had no spirit, that includes joining the police, the fire departments, they didn't want to join.
After that, they started joining. And it seems like 10 years ago, not less than a year.
Think of it, less than a year ago I was campaigning. We won the second election by a lot,
so we had to just prove it by winning the third by too big to rig, I called it. It was too big to rig. And it was an amazing victory.
And thank goodness we won because we were in big trouble. We were in big, big trouble.
But the new recruits, every sailor aboard this ship has answered a sacred call of duty to cross any ocean,
fight any battle, and defend America and its allies with unwavering resolve.
As you know, the George Washington is the only aircraft carrier on earth that is permanently stationed overseas. It's permanent.
Now, if you'd like to take a trip back to America -- Let's do it one time. I'll join you.
I'd love to join you. When I landed on this, it doesn't feel like a ship, it's solid.
This is a solid piece of stuff. These 4.5 acres of power and steel
are the front line of American freedom in the Pacific. Every day you're taking risk to keep our country safe
and to defend peace and security in this incredible part of the world, working with Japan, working with other nations.
I just left Malaysia. We stopped a big war with -- You know that.
We stopped eight wars. Can you imagine? In eight months I stopped eight wars.
I stopped a war month. Think of that. That's pretty good. But I just left Malaysia to thank them
because they helped us very much with one of them. And actually for even a second, they're great people.
And they send their regards. I spent a day there with the Prime Minister and we had a good time. But you carry out your mission bravely.
You carry it out brilliantly and on behalf of all Americans, I just want to say, and I came over to say it loud and clear,
thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.
Incredible people. You are incredible people.
They actually have the best location. Because if they're really good- looking, they end up in Hollywood. You have a great look,
but you're not going to end in Hollywood. They can just see the back of your head. All the media, look at all the fake news back there.
But two years ago, Naval Air Crewman 3rd Class, James McCall was just a few months
into his first fleet tour with the Golden Falcons Helicopter Squadron
when he and his crew were called on a search-and-rescue mission to find three missing navy divers.
Incredible, brave guys the divers. But they were stranded at sea
and right off the Japanese coast, they were exhausted and assuming they were going to die. They assumed they were going to die.
But with unbelievable focus and skill, Crewman McCall was able to find and help rescue
all three divers in the water below saving his fellow sailors. And James is with us today as a shipmate on this carrier,
Crewman McCall. Thank you very much for your incredible bravery and we salute you. Where is James?
Where are you James? Whoa. Come up James. Get up here, James. Come here. Come up here.
Look at this guy. He's a good-looking guy. Get out of here, James, I don't want you up here. No, come here, James.
James McCall: Nice to meet you. The President: You want to say something? Come on.
James McCall: I just want to say I appreciate all my fellow shipmates. What I did back then in Iwakuni,
it was heartbreaking for losing those loved ones down there. But we brought some back whenever we went down there.
And just God bless America and all my fellow shipmates. Appreciate it. And stay a bad, Larry.
The President: I was wondering maybe -- He almost stayed up -- He could have been up here for a while. You did that very well.
He's going to be running for office next week, you watch. Great job, James. A lot of bravery too.
But as James' story reminds us, the Navy is a family and a team, and each of you has a vital role to play.
Gathered here this afternoon are some of those whose toil and sweat gets our magnificent planes in the air
and brings them safely back home. And we have the shooters and the gear dogs
and the paddles and the white shirts, and of course the blue shirts, the yellow shirts,
the red shirts on the flight deck, and all over the hangar bay, I want to thank you all.
Your incredible people. I saw some of you there. We're rushing to get down here and they want to take pictures up there.
They're very aggressive people, "Sir, can I have a picture?" They're -- you're supposed to be standing in attention.
"Sir, could I have a picture, sir?" Yeah. You know what I'm talking about, right?
Very aggressive, but I think they're great. We also have a real geniuses. And these people are incredible,
who maintain the largest and most complex machine ever built, our amazing mechanics and engineers on the --
And I asked you, Captain. I'm building the aircraft, I'm building a lot of things, but I said, "Captain, you're going to tell me something.
I know a lot about these ships, I know a lot about these things building, I want to know, catapults, which is better, the electric or the steam?"
Audience: Steam. The President: Okay, ready? You guys, that's what you do, right?
This is so much better. They go out hire a consultant for millions of dollars that was never on an aircraft carrier before,
so they switched to electric. I disagree with it, but it's all right. Let me ask you. We're going to go steam first and then electric.
Catapults, which is better, electric, or steam?
Audience: Steam. The President: I'm going to put in an order. Seriously, they're spending billions of dollars
to build stupid electric. And the problem when it breaks, you have to send up to MIT,
get the most brilliant people in the world, fly them out. That's ridiculous. The steam, they say they can fix it
with a hammer and a blowtorch, and it works just as well, if not better.
And I love the sight of that beautiful steam pouring off that deck. With the electric, you don't have that.
So we did the Ford in electric, the cost overruns, everything else, but I hope it's going to be okay, but I like steam.
We're going to go back to steam. They changed just for the sake of changing. I said to the architect,
"Have you ever designed a ship before? You only did the biggest ship in the world, right, the Ford?
But we're going to go back." Now, let me ask you the second question, hydraulic for your elevators, or magnets?
The new thing is magnets. So instead of using hydraulic, you can be hit by lightning and it's fine.
You take a little glass of water and you drop it on magnets, I don't know what's going to happen. So the elevators come up in the new carriers.
I think I'm going to change it, by the way. They have magnets. Every tractor has hydraulic, every excavator,
every excavating machine, if any kind has hydraulic, but somebody decided to use magnets for your --
But maybe they're good. Which is better, hydraulic, or magnets?
What the hell is wrong with these people? Can I ask you, the top ranking gentleman right here?
Seriously, I'm putting out an order. I'm going to sign an executive order. When we build aircraft carriers, it's steam for the catapults
and it's hydraulic for the elevators. We'll never have a problem, okay? Male Speaker: Aye aye, sir.
The President: Do you agree? He agrees, everybody agrees, but these people in Washington,
all right, we're going to do that. I'm serious about it. It bothered me so much. I see the costs come in, they spend 900 --
This is not on my watch. So if it was on my watch, I would be very quiet about it. I wouldn't be talking about it. They spent $993 million
on the catapults trying to get them to work, and they had steam, which works so beautifully
and it has for 50 years, right? So we're going to go back. Seriously fellas, I want to make that change. I'm going to do an executive order.
I'm not going to let them continue to do this now. They're trying to make it work. They're trying so hard and they have something that's perfect.
So we're going to go back on that and the magnets, thank you very much. And, of course, we cannot forget the daredevils
and the pilots of the famed Carrier Air Wing Five known as Team Badmen. What the hell is that all about?
Who are they? They're bad. The elite air units aboard
this vessel are storied squadrons like the Royal Maces,
the Diamondback, the Argonauts, the Chippies,
the Titans, the Tiger Tails, the Shadowhawks and the Saberhawks.
All great brave people. They're all incredible. You're all incredible people. Do you know, they say, and I love it, I love aviation.
I actually had a brother who was a pilot. And see, Biden used to say he was a pilot. He was a pilot, he was a truck driver,
whatever, whoever walked in. He wasn't a pilot. He wasn't much of a precedent either, to be honest with you, that I can tell you.
That we all know. But they say the hardest thing to do is landing a plane on an aircraft carrier.
You ever hear that? And great pilots can do everything. They're great pilots, but they can't do that.
It's a very special talent. So the people that do that, that are in this room,
you're a very small group of people. Tremendously talented pilots cannot do it
for a lot of reasons. There are a lot of reasons, a lot of it is right up here. So I have great respect.
The hardest thing you can do is a pilot is land. This ship is so big, but when you're up there in the Pacific with the Atlantic
and the waves are crashing and it's getting dark or it is dark, which is even worse, getting dark is better.
But when you're up there they say it looks like a little needle in the ocean. It's just a very little thing and you're landing on top.
So I have great respect when I see them land. Three weeks, ago they were landing and doing it beautifully.
They had very, very, talented people and nobody embodies skill and nerve and swagger
and the attitude like a US naval aviator, so I have great respect for you all.
Thank you very much. It's one of the reasons I'm here.
That's why I'm here, not someone else. I didn't need this. I didn't need the whole damn job.
I could have been doing. I could've had a nice -- I had such a beautiful life. But you know what?
We're making America greater than ever before and that's why I'm doing it. And we are doing numbers that nobody's ever seen.
Nobody ever even thought possibly before. Think of it, a year ago, we were a dead country.
We're like a dead country and now we have the hottest country anywhere in the world. There's nobody even close.
It's pretty amazing, I'll tell you. None of it would be possible. All of these things that we're doing,
all of the respect that we have, it's really because of people like yourself and the armed forces generally.
It's amazing the job that you all do. None of it would've been possible.
And all of those important missions in the Navy, the devoted members of the food service division
serving up to 14,000 meals every single day. How's the food, good? They say it's good. Is it good?
I hope it's good. It's probably my kind of food. I like that kind of food,
but they don't get the credit they deserve. I want to just thank them very much and congratulate, 14,000 meals.
Let's also hear it for all the sailors holding the American flag high at CFAY
as well as the crews from the ferocious, DESRON 15. DESRON 15.
But together, the sailors here today give your very best to our nation.
And as your Commander-in-Chief, I'm fighting every single day to ensure that we give you our very best also.
We do. We're giving you everything. We're giving you more than anybody's ever given. We're bringing it up to a standard that nobody's ever seen before.
We're starting to make ships also. Part of our deal with the trade is we're starting to make ships. We used to be number one at making ships
and then we lost our way, but now we're starting to make ships again and we'll do it very soon.
It's not going to take that long. But it's a process. It's not like making a bullet.
It's that big long process. We've got it going though, I think, in the right direction. I think within a short period of time,
the Philadelphia yards as an example, is now owned by a group that's going to be making a lot of ships,
a good group of people. And we're going to be working also with Japan on making ships.
We're going to make a lot of ships again. We used to make -- Think of it, we were number one. And then over the years, they just lost their way.
They started making other things, they stopped making ships. We're going to be making ships again. We've more than, think of this, $17 trillion, trillion with a T,
pouring into the United States of America from all over the world. And that's the biggest number in the history of any country.
And this is in eight months, really. We're here nine, but this is in eight months, over $17 trillion.
As an example, the last administration did less than a trillion in four years. We did 17, more than 17 trillion in eight months.
And I think by the time we finish up our first year, we're going to be over $20 or $21 trillion of money coming into our country.
And I want to thank Japan, because Japan is making big investments into the United States. And they're very happy because the stock market
has gone up very nicely. We've made Japan a lot of money. That's okay, but they're a big investor in our country
and we like that. But think of those numbers we weren't doing anywhere near. We were laughed at,
and now they're all saying they've never seen anything like what's happened in such a short period of time.
And I was just told by the prime minister that Toyota is going to be putting auto plants all over the United States
to the tune of over $10 billion. So that's Toyota. So go out and buy a Toyota.
And that's a lot to do with, because right now, we have all the AI plants. We have so many things happening in the United States,
and it's because of November 5th election day, but it's also because of tariffs. The tariffs have been so good.
We're taken in trillions and trillions of dollars. I heard them before I came up, I heard --
You're all on television now. They're talking all the networks, everybody is covering it. Look at these characters back. Look at all of them.
And they were talking about the tariffs. The tariffs have -- Nobody understood tariffs like I understood tariffs.
And the tariffs are having people go into our country and spend tremendous numbers like we've never seen.
And that brings jobs with it. It brings jobs, it brings importance, it brings everything. It brings a strong military.
It brings a lot of things to other countries. I mean, if you look at some of the deals that we did, if India is going to go to war with Pakistan,
and as you go to war, we're not going to do any trade. I was going to put big tariffs on both countries.
And they said, "Well, I guess we're not going to go to war." Two nuclear powers, we stopped it, but we stopped a lot of wars. Without tariffs,
we wouldn't have national security like we have, but we've never had national security like we have it right now. And literally a year ago,
you had very little national security. You had people that didn't have a clue.
American strength is roaring back like never before. And with your help, America is respected once more
and it is respected at levels that we haven't seen before. On my first day back in the White House,
I deployed the men and women of the United States military to stop the invasion on our Southern border.
It was an invasion losing hundreds of thousands of people to fentanyl, into drugs.
And now, we have the most secure border in American history. For five months, they said zero,
no people came into our country illegally. They came in through a legal process,
but nobody came in through the Southern border. Can you imagine? Even I can't. It's hard to believe that.
And we do have it tight as a drum, but that's what we have to have. If you don't have borders, if you don't have a fair media, you need certain things.
You need a good fair media. They're getting better. They're not there yet, that I can tell you, but they're getting better.
But you need borders, you got to have borders in a country or you don't have a country. And now we have a border
the likes of which this country has never seen before. And people respect us for it.
With the help of our warfighters, we're decimating the savage drug cartels that poison our people.
200,000 people, maybe more than that, died last year because of what came into our country
through an open border policy where 25 million people poured into our country.
Totally unvetted, totally unchecked. They came from prisons. They came from mental institutions and insane asylum.
They were drug dealers. They were bad people. 11,388 were murderers,
half of which committed more than one murder. They let them into our country. We're getting them the hell out. We're getting them out. We're getting them out fast.
Is that okay with you? Yes, right? I have no doubt. Got to get them out. Just an unforced era.
And we're also straightening out our cities. Washington D.C., our beautiful capitol was a killing mess.
People getting killed all the time. It was very high crime. And we sent in our National Guard, again, great people.
I don't say that we're totally politically correct, that's okay. And now, it's very safe.
Now, it's considered a very safe. It took 12 days, we got 1,700 people, career criminals,
many of which came in through Biden's open border, and they infiltrated our nation's capital
and we had a very unsafe capital. But for years before that, it was very unsafe. Now, it's as safe as there is anywhere in the country.
You can have your daughter, your girlfriend, your wife, your boyfriend, walk right in through the middle,
nobody's going to touch him. The crime is down to almost nothing. It's a whole different ballgame. It took literally 12 days,
but let's give us a month to do it, really. We had it drum tight and it's a beautiful thing.
And our people in the service and -- People don't care. If we send in our military,
if we send in our National Guard, if we send in Space Command,
they don't care who the hell it is, they just want to be safe. And we have safe cities. Now, we're starting in Memphis.
And Memphis was a disaster. They've been there for two weeks and it's a whole different series.
Crime is less than half, and within a month it'll be gone. Getting rid of all the bad ones there. We're going to go into Chicago,
we're going to go into our cities, we're going to clean them out, we're going to straighten them out, and we're going to have safe cities,
because you want to protect safe cities. We're going to have beautiful safe cities. And it's happening very quickly and very easily, actually.
It's easy for us, it's hard for them. And we have to have a little more help. It doesn't matter really. We could do as we want to do,
but it would be nice to have more help from some of the Democrat governors that don't mind in Chicago.
Two weeks ago, four people murdered. 11 people shot. This weekend, it was terrible.
Much worse than that. And then we have a governor that stands up and says, "Oh, it's wonderful." It's not wonderful.
And what we're doing is we're going to make it totally safe. It'll be very safe very soon, and we're doing that with all of our cities that are troubled.
We have cities that are troubled. We can't have cities that are troubled and we're sending in our National Guard.
And if we need more than the National Guard. We'll send more than the National Guard because we're going to have safe cities.
We're not going to have people killed in our cities. And whether people like that or not, that's what we're doing.
And you've been watching what our missiles do to boats and ships and submarines. How about the submarine?
They said no, that was just fishing. The radical left Democrats said, "Well, it was a submarine, but they were just fishing."
Submarines don't go fishing, do they? You know more about submarines than I do; you have a beauty parked outside, actually.
This is a submarine. And you know what? It was designed for transporting drugs, and it got hit.
But each one of those vessels that we hit kill, on average, 25,000 people, American people, every single year they kill --
Each one of them kill 25,000 people. So we have to stop it, and we have stopped it.
And I want to thank Pete for having the courage to do it. And believe me, people are very honored that you do it.
25,000 people for each boat. For many years, the drug cartels have waged war in America,
and at long last, we're finally waging war on the cartels. We're waging war like they've never seen before.
And we're going to win that battle. We're winning it already. The sea -- I mean, the only problem is nobody wants to go into the sea anymore.
Even the fishing boats, they say, "Let's take a pass." But they don't want that. But we're knocking them out one by one,
and very importantly, we've almost stopped completely the drugs coming in by sea,
and now we'll stop the drugs coming in by land. That's going to be very easy. More importantly, we're ending wars;
we're ending wars all over this planet. And as you know, as I said before, I ended eight wars in eight months.
The most of any president in history, no president that we know has ever ended any war. A lot of them go into wars,
but this includes Kosovo and Serbia, the Congo and Rwanda, Pakistan and India,
Israel and Iran. You saw that. How about those B-2 bombers? They went in there, they took out that nuclear capability.
Iran would've had a nuclear weapon within two months, not anymore. Egypt and Ethiopia,
Armenia and Azerbaijan--that was going on for 35 years. Big, horrible war. And just this month
we ended the war in Gaza in the Middle East. We ended the war in the Middle East; nobody thought it was possible.
And we also just signed a deal in Malaysia between a war that was just starting.
Cambodia and Thailand. So we saved millions and millions of lives, and I did it mostly verbally;
we didn't have to get you involved. When we don't get you involved, that's a good thing. We don't want you to get involved.
If I can avoid you getting involved, if I have an ability to do things that maybe other people don't, or we see things,
but we stopped a lot of those wars based on trade and tariffs and penalties,
and they're getting all ready to fight, and then we tell them, "No more trading with the United States.
We're putting tariffs on your nation, et cetera, et cetera." It's called national security for us, but it's really national security for the whole world.
And everywhere we go, America is actually making peace, and it's peace through strength. When they look at this,
when they look at you people, they say, "We're not going to mess around with them." So it's very important. After years of crippling inflation.
Back home, we had the worst inflation in the history of our country; energy costs are down. You know, energy costs are way down,
gasoline prices are way down, grocery prices are way down.
We have a little problem with beef; we're going to get that down very quickly. But the prices are way down. Mortgage rates are down
despite having an incompetent head of the Fed. I call him too late. He's always too late.
He's too late in lowering interest rates. I call him Jerome Too Late Powell. But despite having a totally grossly incompetent guy --
We just blow through it because we're doing so well. Inflation has been defeated, and workers' wages are rising
at the fastest pace in 60 years. And that includes your wages. They're rising at the fastest pace.
The workers--I'm not talking about the rich people. Rich people -- Everyone is doing well. Everyone in our country is now doing well.
My first term, we built the greatest economy in the history of the world. We had an economy like nobody has seen before.
Now we are doing it again, but this time actually it's going to be much bigger and much stronger.
I told you $17 trillion, but it's going to be $20, $21 trillion. And that's numbers that have never been heard of before.
Much bigger than any other country in the world by literally $15, $16 trillion. It's amazing.
The sailors and the ship sacrifice so much for our country and the president. And I will tell you,
the president standing right up here loves you. I respect you, and I love you. And I'm giving everything.
I have to make sure that when you get home, you find an America that is safe and proud
and sovereign and free. One service member who reminds us that we're working for you and for everybody
and for our country is Chief Warrant Officer Will Hightower, who serves on the George Washington
in the all-important deck department. Do you know what the deck department is? I have no idea, but they do.
In April 2024, Will sailed away from Norfolk, leaving behind his wonderful wife,
Megan, their precious six-year-old daughter, and their one-year-old son. In the past 12 months,
he has only been home for three weeks total. Three weeks, an enormous sacrifice,
very tough on the family, but an experience everyone on the ship really knows very well. In February Will's tour will come to an end,
and he will finally be going home just in time for his daughter's birthday.
So Will, I want to thank you together with all of those people that go through the same thing. I want to really thank -- Where is Will?
Is Will around here? Where is Will? Wow, look at him. These are good-looking people here.
That's great, Will. How does it feel? Good. Will Hightower: It feels amazing, Mr. President. The President: That's great. It feels amazing. That's fantastic. That's fantastic.
See, in the old days I'd say, "Does your wife still love you?" But I don't do that anymore. "Does your wife still love you?"
Yes. Will Hightower: Yes. The President: Do you still love your wife? Will Hightower: Every day. The President: Every day. That's good. Okay, that's good. So that's good. Beautiful.
And say hello to your daughter, right, and your wife. And just in conclusion, every sailor here today
inherits a legacy of valor and grit and glory unmatched in the long history of mankind's voyage on the seas.
It's a voyage like nobody's ever had, like you have. For two and a half centuries, America's navy has preserved
the vision of our first commander in chief, who gave this ship its storied name,
its righteous soul, and its timeless motto. "First in war, first in peace."
Very famous phrase, George Washington. After 250 years, that is exactly what our country is today.
It's first in war, first in peace, first in wealth, first in power, first in science,
first in spirit, and first in freedom. And we went through four bad years, but now America will always be first again.
If you have the right person up here, if you have somebody that understands a lot of different subjects,
we're going to be bigger, better, stronger, and more important, really frankly, to the world.
Japan respects us. If you see what's going on all over the world, they're respecting us again.
They respect us like never before. The treatment they give me all over as I go around to different countries is great,
but it's really a respect for me. But it's a bigger respect for our country; they respect our country again.
They didn't respect our country just a few years ago. From Boston Harbor to Hampton Roads
and from the Caribbean Sea to the Red Sea, from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Persian Gulf
to what is now known as the Gulf of America.
Isn't it nice they say it now routinely? I heard the news today: "The Gulf of America weather is wonderful."
They don't say it with a smile; it's called the Gulf of America. How did that happen, right? For many years, I said, "
Why is it called the Gulf of Mexico when we seem to have the shore?" Well, we do. We have 92% of the shoreline.
So I said, "You know, when we make it back --" Not if, when, too big to rig; we made it too big to rig.
I said, "Get out and vote too big to rig." Make it that way. I said, "I'm going to change it."
And one of the first things I did is I changed it; nobody could even fight it. They tried, we got sued all over the place.
We won every suit, and it's now officially the Gulf of America. Isn't that nice?
But our sailors have written honor, greatness, and triumph into the pages of history.
What you're doing is incredible, and it's an incredible time for our country. On gun decks and flight decks and torpedo rooms and cockpits,
the men and women of the navy have poured out their blood and sweat and tears to defend the land of the free and the home of the brave.
They've crossed icy channels, leapt from burning records, stormed into frigid waters, soared into deadly skies,
and laid down their lives to ensure the survival of liberty.
Now all of us here today carry on that noble mission. And no matter what challenge comes our way,
no matter what danger we face, we hoist our great American flag very, very high.
We race into the waves, and we rally to that immortal battle cry of the American sailor.
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead," right? Together with our incredible Japanese allies
and all of our allies all over the world. We stand strong, we stand proud, we will stand taller than we've ever stood before,
and we will be freer and braver and more brilliant than ever before. And we will fight, fight, fight. And we will win, win, win.
And I want to thank everybody at the USS George Washington and the U.S. Forces Japan.
God bless our military. God bless Japan. God bless the United States of America,
and God bless our navy. Thank you, everybody. Thank you. (cheers and applause)
♪ ("YMCA" by the Village People) ♪

[admin]

CHAOS in Cyprus! Israeli Ships SET ABLAZE as Revolt EXPLODES Against Netanyahu’s Expansion!
Openminded Reporter
Nov 1, 2025 #Cyprus #Israel #Netanyahu

The streets of Cyprus are erupting as furious protesters rise against Israel’s creeping expansion and secret land grabs, with Israeli ships reportedly set ablaze in a wave of anti-colonial anger that has left Netanyahu’s regime in shock; what started as a real estate scandal has exploded into a full-blown revolt — a direct challenge to Israel’s attempts to dominate the Mediterranean and use Cyprus as its next pawn; Cypriots have had enough, and the fire is spreading fast.

In this video, we break down the hidden ties between Israel and Cyprus, the secret land deals, the influence operations, and how the same pattern of occupation that destroyed Palestine is now unfolding in the Eastern Mediterranean; we also explore the explosive court case against Israeli developer Shimon Aykut, the leaked “Poseidon’s Wrath” plan revealing Israel’s military ambitions, and how the youth of Cyprus have reignited resistance; this revolt isn’t just about ships — it’s about sovereignty, survival, and saying NO to occupation.



Transcript

The war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu is
reeling in disbelief as Cyprus, once
seen as a silent partner, now turns
against him and his colonial schemes.
The island erupting in fury and defiance
as protests sweep through its streets,
shaking the Israeli establishment to its
core. This isn't just politics. It's a
reckoning, a long overdue rejection of
the creeping expansionism that has
defined Israel's strategy in the region
for decades. Reports from across Cyprus
describe a wave of outrage so intense
that authorities have been forced to
limit relations with Israel, freeze
weapon transfers, and arrest criminal
agents of the occupation court, trying
to buy up vast swaths of criate land
under the guise of real estate
investment. The goal was simple. turns
Cyprus into another outpost, another
vassal of apartheid Israel, another pawn
in a colonial chess game that has run
for too long.

General of the leftwing Ael party,
Stefano Stefanu has said that Israeli
investors are buying up coastal land and
are building what he called Zionist
schools and synagogues. He claimed that
parts of Cyprus are turning into gated
ghettos.

The Israeli historian Elon Pappe argues that Israel is imploding. He defines the current far-right government of Benjamin Netanyahu as neozionist, meaning that the old values of Zionism have become more extreme, more openly racist, more supremacist, and more violent. This neozionist state has abandoned the incremental approach to slow motion ethnic cleansing of Palestinians which characterized past Zionist governments. It is using genocide as a weapon to empty the Gaza Strip of Palestinians and soon perhaps the West Bank.

It is dominated by Jewish extremists that have turned Israel into what he calls the state of Judea, distinct from the old state of Israel. The state of Judea, run by fanatic Jewish colonists, 750,000 of whom live in the West Bank, fuses religious Zionism, with Orthodox Judaism. It seeks to establish an Israeli empire that will dominate its Arab neighbors, especially Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria. The hatred for Palestinians by those who run this neo-zionist state, the state of Judea, extends towards secular Israeli Jews. This, he argues, means that ultimately Israel will fracture, making Israel unsustainable. At the same time, as the American empire unravels, a process accelerated by the ineptitude and corruption of the Trump administration, Israel's fundamental pillar of support will erode, forcing retrenchment by the United States, including in the Middle East.

What will the collapse of Israel mean for Israelis, Palestinians, and the Middle East? Will it usher in a process of decolonization? Or will it foster even more violence, bloodletting, and extremism? Will it be
possible to replace Israel with a secular state, one where Palestinians have equal rights with Israelis, a
country of one person, one vote? Or will Israel atrophy into a despotic theocracy with its educated secular elite fleeing the country and its economy disintegrating under the onslaught?

Joining me to discuss the future of Israel and his book Israel On the Brink is Elon Pappe, professor of history at the College of Social Sciences and International Studies at the University of Exiter in the UK and director of the university's European Center for Palestine Studies. His other books include the ethnic cleansing of
Palestine, 10 myths about Israel, and a history of modern Palestine.

-- Is Israel 'On the Brink?' (w/ Legendary Israeli Historian Ilan Pappé). The Chris Hedges YouTube Channel. Oct 29, 2025

Now, Stefanu also added that
Israel does not tolerate criticism and
wants to control everything.

Israel's ambassador has condemned these
statements calling them plain and simple
anti-semitism. Ambassador Orurin Analik
has said that Stefanu had crossed a line,
targeting a community on the basis of
identity.

As I dug into the history between Cyprus
and Zionism, I found a dark pattern of
manipulation and deceit, a story that
leaves a bitter taste every time it
resurfaces. Because Cyprus was never
just an island to Zionists. It was a
tool, a stepping stone in their march
toward domination, a place to exploit
before Palestine became the chosen
prize. Before I tell you about the
latest revolt against Israeli
encroachment through property grabs and
covert settlements, understand this.
Zionist history in Cyprus has always
been one of opportunism, of taking
without belonging, of using others as
ladders to climb toward power.

We have decided to sign a 5-year
bilateral defense cooperation with this
country. And we continue to work hand in
hand with the states committing that
genocide.

In the late 19th century, figures like
Theodore Herzl and the early Zionist
ideologues eyed Cyprus not as a home but
as a staging ground. They saw it as a
convenient base near Palestine, a
launchpad to advance their exclusionary
dream, treating the island not as a
sovereign land with its own people and
history, but as disposable real estate
to be bought, used, and discarded. The
records of those Zionist congresses make
it clear Cyprus was discussed,
dissected, and dismissed when the
greater conquest of Palestine came into
focus. Now, decades later, that history
is repeating itself, and Cypriot youth
know it. They've seen what Israel did to
Palestine, and they're saying, "Never
again." Protests have erupted across the
island, blocking Israeli ships and
torching some in acts of open defiance.
A fiery statement against the silent
infiltration that's been unfolding under
the banner of investment and
development. Reports suggest Israel even
deployed air defense systems in Cyprus,
allegedly to protect its assets. But in
truth, to prepare for any uprising that
could threaten its grip over the Cypriot
government. To save face, the
authorities moved swiftly, a Cypriot
court recently sentenced Israeli
businessman Shimon Aikut to 5 years in
prison for illegally developing Greek
Cypriot property in the Turkish held
north.

And in doing so
supposedly kind of secure the island
for themselves. This is what the agenda
is here.

And this is also why the last
two years have been reports of Cypress
being given as well uh Israeli defense
systems which I think were recently
confirmed as well. And I had noticed
this in the initial stages around uh
pretty much since the early days of 2024
when I found it alarming as to why
Cypress all of a sudden uh was
accumulating or being given Israeli air
defense systems. I was concerned as to
how what what exactly is the plan that
they're trying to prepare Cypress for.
What is Cypress going to be defending
itself against? Yes, there is an
occupation, but pretty there is a there
there's a there's a relative the
conflict is frozen. So, there's a
relative calm. There's a status quo to
all of a sudden be escalating air
defense systems from Israel inside of
Cyprus. It goes to show that there's an
agenda here as well. And the agenda that
they have for Cyprus is to expel Turkey
in order to limit Turkey's influence
within the region because Israel wants
to be the dominating influence in the
region.

And this fits part and parcel
with the greater Israel plan. The idea
is to expand and accumulate as much
territory as possible. I mean, this is
how colonialism operates. They want to
take vast territory. They want to
control Syria. This is why they're
occupying Syria at the moment. This is
why they're using the Dru. using the the
conflicts that have arisen after the the
the overthrow of Assad inside Syria in
order to be able to kind of uh you know
divide and conquer Syria in order to
probably bulcanize Syria or take control
of the vast territories of Syria again
fitting within the greater Israel plan.
And now they're trying to do the same
thing in Cyprus. And they're also trying
to do the same thing in Lebanon by
creating intersectionist or kind of
fueling the intersectionalist tensions
within Lebanon in order to basically
justify and provide pretext to
constantly um sort of militarily
intervene and occupy Lebanon which they
are occupying five key territories
inside of Lebanon and they are refusing
to leave.

Cyprus is now the next point
of contestation and it's going to be the
Cypriot public that is going to suffer
the cost because Turkey is a strong
military. This is a fact and even though
Israel itself is backed by the United
States etc. uh if there's going to be
any sort of tension that's going to be
created between Israel and Turkey and
using the Cypriot people as as bait
essentially this is going to completely
destroy the island and it's going to
it's going to bring about again the
tensions within the Cypriot population uh
and it's and and any sort of
attempt to liberate the island
from the north without any resolution
between the two communities and the
unfortunate bloody history that has
taken place is going to merely generate
more tensions within the public that
will then justify further imperialist
intervention on the island. Therefore,
forever depleting any opportunity for
this place to unify peacefully, but also
to be a sovereign independent state,
which is why Cypriots should be very
alarmed about what's happening. But the
vast majority of them, I don't think,
know, especially from a certain
generation upwards that may not be are
relying on Cypriots media to relay this
information to them, they are not aware
of the extent of the dangers in their
country.

I've seen certain reports, and by the way
uh you're quite right to point out that
size of uh Turkey Turkey's army is
formidable. It's the second largest army
in NATO by a significant margin over
every other uh European country. Um uh
I've seen reports of aite considerable
military buildup uh by the Turkish
forces in the north of Cypress in the
occupied part of Cypress. Are those
reports accurate and do we know the
extent of that buildup?

I I mean I believe those reports are
rather accurate because as I said um I
don't I I don't have I haven't seen any
other way to verify this is information
as well that I have seen come out of out
of the north uh in media outlets out of
the north. Um the criate media has
touched on it. Um so therefore I believe
that it is that this is currently
happening but this is part and parcel of
response to the current tensions that
are happening now between Israel and
Turkey and um because of Israel's as
I've said they're constantly in like
trying to integrate Cyprus into this
greater Israel project and but to do so
you do need to expel Turkey. Turkey
however itself has its own agenda in
Cyprus. I mean the entire reason that
they have occupied the north of Cypus
because it was part and parcel of a plan
that was laid out by President Johnson
from the United States uh in 1964. This
was really and this was a part of the
idea of appeasing both Greece and Turkey
at the time which were NATO states in
order to secure the eastern frontier
from the USSR. So the idea was to give
the north part of Cypress to Turkey
because it's essential for its own
surveillance and military security. This
is why the northern part of Cyprus is so
significant to Turkey as well. And
they're not about to just simply allow
Israel to infiltrate into the south and
try to so-called liberate or cause any
tensions that will threaten their own
security interests in the region, which
I said it's not just happening in Cypus.
We've also seen these tensions between
Turkey and Israel also take part
happening in Syria as well. And it's
also going to begin happening in
Lebanon because Turkey also has a vested
interest for its own military, its own
economic sort of ambitions within
Lebanon to have significant control over
the north of Lebanon, which again is
something that does not appease Israel.
But at the same time, I don't even think
it appeases the United States in many
ways because Turkey is a
very big country. It has a powerful
military. it is an important um uh it's
it's become one of the most if not the
most powerful sort of player in West
Asia and this threatens Israel but it
also threatens the United States who
wants to be the dominant party within
the region for economic purposes for uh
you know in order to be able to control
resources and trade routes etc. And
having a Turkey that is at this point
becoming far too powerful impedes on the
interests as well of western states.

So what we're going to see, I believe in
Cypress, is that we're going to see
Israel uh try to antagonize Turkey
through Cyprus, as we're seeing in
Syria as well.

The proof of state involvement came
shortly after when an Israeli newspaper
in classic fashion published an article
warning of security threats from Cyprus.
The piece written by Zionist commentator
Shay Gal outlined something far more
sinister, a plan called Poseidon's
wroth, which described how Israel could
dominate the Mediterranean using
military and naval power. Gal wrote that
Israel must be prepared to control
regional sea lanes and strike
preemptively under the guise of
self-defense, invoking Turkey's
nuclear projects as justification. The
language was clear. It wasn't analysis.
It was a threat. A message to Cyprus and
the wider region that Israel views them
as obstacles, not partners. Pawns in its
maritime ambitions.

This wasn't diplomacy. It was
imperialism dressed as strategy. Another
blueprint for domination hiding behind
security rhetoric.

Cyprus sits at the
heart of a geopolitical storm. Its
location makes it vital for energy
transit, for trade routes, for control
over the eastern Mediterranean. Israel
wants that control and projects like the
East Med pipeline and the Eastern
Mediterranean Gas Forum reveal its plan
to dominate regional energy flow to
deliver gas to Europe on its terms and
to exclude anyone who stands in its way,
particularly Turkey and the Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus. This is why
Cypress matters to Israel not as a
friend but as a piece of territory in
its vision of regional hegemony. It's
about pipelines, profit and power
disguised as cooperation.

Meanwhile, the
Greek Cypriot leadership weak and deeply
compromised has played straight into
Israel's hands. Plagued by
socio-economic instability, political
dependency and blind admiration for
western powers, Nikos Christodoulides
has turned Cyprus into the
weakest link in the eastern
Mediterranean. The alliance with Israel
and the United States, founded on
hostility toward Turks and built on the
logic of the enemy of my enemy is my
friend, has created a fragile, unholy
pact that now threatens to consume the
island.

The youth of Cyprus see this
betrayal clearly, and their revolt is
not just about land or ships. It's about
reclaiming their dignity from foreign
manipulation and refusing to let their
island become another porn in Israel's
endless pawn in Israel's endless game of colonization.

Thank you for watching. I truly
appreciate your time and courage to seek
the truth. Keep your support strong by
subscribing to the channel and sharing
this message far and wide. That's how we
keep honest journalism alive. That's how
we resist suppression. Until next time,
may justice prevail and may peace return
to those who fight for it. God bless
you.

********************************

Northern Cyprus is also an Israeli problem. It is not Israel's role or desire to liberate Northern Cyprus. However, if the threat from the area reaches a critical threshold, Israel's strategic posture must shift. Israel, in coordination with Greece and Cyprus, must prepare a contingency operation for liberating the island's north.
by Shay Gal
Israel Hayom
Published on 07-29-2025 10:10 Last modified: 07-29-2025 10:10
https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/no ... i-problem/

[x]
Turkish and Northern Cypriot flags. Photo: AP | Photo: AP

Cyprus recently marked the 51st anniversary of Turkey's 1974 invasion - a lasting trauma for Greek Cypriots. For decades, Israel treated this conflict as a distant Greek-Turkish issue, but must now clearly acknowledge: Northern Cyprus is not just a Greek-Cypriot problem - it is also an Israeli one. In practical terms, Northern Cyprus functions as an international no-man's land, enabling Turkey and terrorist groups like Hamas and Iran's Quds Force unrestricted operational freedom.

Since the invasion, which killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands, Turkey's presence has quietly transformed. The area is now a forward base for Turkey's military, hosting sophisticated weapons systems, cyber surveillance, and signals intelligence (SIGINT) infrastructure capable of intercepting both military and civilian Israeli communication, alongside covert terrorist facilities supported by Ankara. According to leaked intelligence documents, senior Turkish officials characterized Northern Cyprus as an ideal location "where anything can be done without interference by police or judicial oversight".

Turkey can deploy armed drones from Lefkoniko airfield - converted from an abandoned airport into a drone base amid regional gas disputes - far more rapidly than from its mainland bases. Since May 2021, Turkey officially stationed armed Bayraktar TB2 drones there, and more advanced Akinci UAVs were publicly showcased at a military parade in July 2024. These UAVs can rapidly target Israeli gas rigs, naval vessels, and strategic sites. In addition, Turkey's advanced ATMACA anti-ship missiles, with a range exceeding 200 km, could directly threaten Israeli maritime assets, including its critical natural gas platforms. Moreover, Turkey's new Typhoon ballistic missile is capable of precisely hitting targets up to 560 kilometers away. According to Western intelligence, missile bases in Kyrenia and Famagusta are already prepared for their deployment, posing Turkey's first direct ballistic threat to Israel, with the capability of striking Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Haifa Bay.

[x]
Northern Cyprus border. Photo: Ami Shooman

Meanwhile, the EU continues security cooperation with Ankara despite Turkey's occupation of EU territory - a contradiction undermining EU credibility and posing risks to Greece, Cyprus, and Israel as well. Ankara's aggressive foreign policy, marked by unlawful occupations, sanctions violations, and ties to extremist groups, aligns it with rogue regimes rather than NATO allies. Given NATO's requirement of unanimous consent and Turkey's strained relations within the alliance, Article 5 protection is unlikely even in unrelated conflicts, and practically impossible regarding Northern Cyprus, internationally recognized as Cypriot territory.

Yet the threat is not solely military. Lacking effective international oversight, the occupied area has become a hub for terrorism financing and money laundering, with Iranian and Turkish illicit funds flowing through shell companies to support Hamas and other terror groups. Documents seized during Operation "Guardian of the Walls" (2021) and "Iron Swords" (2023) in Gaza revealed Hamas's plans to establish an operational branch in Turkey and Northern Cyprus, tasked with carrying out attacks against Israelis in Europe. Furthermore, in 2023, a Quds Force cell uncovered in the region planned attacks against Israeli targets in Europe. This Iranian cell underscores Northern Cyprus's status as a safe haven for anti-Israel operations. Thus, Turkish control over Northern Cyprus enables Turkey and Iran to bypass sanctions and escalate their strategic threat against Israel. Moreover, hotels, casinos, universities, and ports in Northern Cyprus have reportedly become covert hubs for espionage, blackmail, and intelligence operations coordinated by Turkish security forces and organized crime networks, including 'honey trap' operations targeting international officials.

[x]

Northern Cyprus. Photo: Moshe Shai

It is not Israel's role or desire to liberate Northern Cyprus. However, if the threat from the area reaches a critical threshold, Israel's strategic posture must shift. Israel, in coordination with Greece and Cyprus, must prepare a contingency operation for liberating the island's north. Such an operation would neutralize Turkish reinforcement capabilities from the mainland, eliminate air-defense systems in Northern Cyprus, destroy intelligence and command centers, and finally remove Turkish forces, restoring internationally recognized Cypriot sovereignty.

This contingency plan could be termed "Poseidon's Wrath," named after the Greek god of the sea, highlighting maritime dominance and the devastating consequences of a worst-case scenario. The name underscores Israel's focus on safeguarding strategic maritime assets and maintaining open sea lanes critical for regional security. This would remain a contingency plan: Israel does not seek confrontation but must remain fully prepared. The Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, previously regarded as a highly unlikely scenario, was eventually executed. Turkey, currently constructing the problematic Akkuyu nuclear plant on its Mediterranean coast - a project Russia is quickly abandoning due to recognized risks - should internalize this lesson.

Shay Gal is an expert on international politics, crisis management, and strategic communications. He works internationally, focusing on power dynamics, geopolitical strategy, and public diplomacy, and their influence on policy-making.

[admin]

BREAKING: Trump QUITS On HEGSETH As CRIMES LEAK OUT!
Jack Cocchiarella
Nov 30, 2025

Political commentator Jack Cocchiarella reacts to Donald Trump's breaking with Pete Hegseth.



Transcript

If there's one thing that we know about
Donald Trump, it's that he watches a lot
of TV. He's never working and he's
always sitting on his fat ass watching
Fox. But today, it wasn't his favorite
propaganda outlet that he was tuned
into. It was the coverage around Pete
Hegth's war crime. Specifically, what
Mark Kelly had to say because it is the
only reason for what Donald Trump just
did. quitting on Pete Hegth publicly,
throwing him under the bus, breaking
with him for the first time during his
term in a press gaggle on Air Force One
that is shaking up this administration
and putting another huge crack in the
fracturing MAGA coalition. We are going
to get into it all. But before we do, if
I could quickly ask you to leave a like
on this video and if you haven't already
and you enjoy our channel to hit that
subscribe button because it goes a long
way in supporting our work. Now, before
we get into what Trump had to say
quitting on Hegsth, I want to start what
I believe led him to get to that point.
And it's what Mark Kelly had to say
about Hegsth's illegal order. Right here
happening right now. The Washington Post
reporting that Secretary Hegsth gave an
order to kill everybody on one of those
suspected drug boats during the first
strike in September. Are you calling for
US service members to actively disobey
orders like those?
Well, if orders are illegal, not only do
they not have to f follow them, they are
legally required not to follow it.
Do you think that constitutes an illegal
order?
I think there needs to be an
investigation. And I hope that the
reporting is not accurate. I care so
much about the United States Navy and
those service members. This was an
operation uh involving the most
professional members of the military, US
Navy Seals who I rever I hope and pray
that this is not true, but there needs
to be an investigation by the inspector
general. Pete Hgsth uh fired many of the
inspectors general in DoD, but whoseever
left left needs to investigate it. We're
going to investigate it. I sit on the
armed services committee. We're going to
have an investigation. We're going to
we're going to have a public hearing.
We're going to put these folks under
oath and we're going to find out what
happens happened and then there needs to
be accountability.
Let me ask you
now. I certainly do not get the security
briefings of a United States senator. So
I I can't say this with 100% certainty,
but I read the reporting. I trust the
reporting. The reporting is accurate.
Pete Hexath is a war criminal. I do not
need to wait for Congress to tell me
that. the fact that Republicans both in
the House and the Senate on the Armed
Services Committee are calling for these
investigations, are moving forward with
these investigations, that these are
bipartisan investigations, tells me
everything that I need to know. and also
Republicans. It had to rise to war
crimes before you would start holding
Pete Hegathth accountable and saying,
"hm, maybe the guy on the third marriage
in the fifth affair and the eighth
illegitimate child uh and and multiple
allegations credibly against him, yet
maybe this guy isn't isn't the right fit
to be the Secretary of Defense." How did
it how did it take war crimes for us to
get to that point? That that's besides
the fact that no, I do believe this
reporting. It was an illegal order. Pete
Hexth is a war criminal and good on Mark
Kelly for continuing to call him out no
matter how much Donald Trump tries to
move forward with this intimidation plan
because he thinks it's laughable. He
thinks that's going to scare Mark Kelly.
Really? Get the [ __ ] out of here. That's
just a ridiculous notion. And Mark Kelly
made that very clear.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegsith has
personally threatened to recall you uh
to active duty so that you can be court
marshaled. Secretary Hegsith adding your
video quote intentionally undercut good
order and discipline. Did it?
I said something very simple and
non-controversial.
And Donald Trump said I should be
hanged, executed, prosecuted. Pete Heg
said I should be court marshaled. I
mean, how ridiculous is this? We say
follow the law and this is their
response. These are not serious people.
And Kristen, this is meant to just
intimidate us. We're sticking up for the
Constitution here and the rule of law,
and they're saying these folks should be
executed for doing that. I mean, Pete
Hegth is not a serious person. He's
unqualified for this job. Now, if you
watched the morning shows today, if you
watch the Sunday morning shows, you saw
a lot of Mark Kelly and Donald Trump,
who is always tuning in to the Sunday
morning shows, as was evidenced by
something he said again about Tim Walls
during this press gaggle, certainly
tuned in. And I think he sees the
building pressure. I think he sees Mark
Kelly unafraid. And I think he at least
knows that he does not need another set
of scandals from a guy in Pete Hexath
who Trump picked to be the secretary of
defense because he thought that this is
a telegenic guy. He can go out there and
communicate. He can rah rah. He can, you
know, struggled to do a pull-up and
it'll make us look good. Now, of course,
Pete Hexath is not a good look for
anybody, but Trump said that this guy
would fire up the MAGA base. But now
with Republicans turning on him, wanting
investigations, do you think Donald
Trump wants to deal with any more of
this as his term falls apart? I don't
think so. And as is the case with anyone
who works for Donald Trump, is friends
with Donald Trump, associates with
Donald Trump, you are bound to get
screwed over by Donald Trump. That is
the reality that Pete Hexath is waking
up to.
Strike. there were a second strike that
killed the people committed in a first
strike. Are you about
I don't know that that happened. And
Pete said he did not want them. He
didn't even know what people were
talking about. So we'll look at we'll
look into it. But no, I wouldn't have
wanted that. The second strike first
strike was very lethal on his mind.
Midas touch responded to this quote from
Trump writing preparing to throw Hegsth
under the bus. Now a lot of people are
speculating and I agree that Trump
saying well I wouldn't have wanted a
second strike. I didn't say to do that.
I'm the no new wars guy. The the the
initial strike killing innocent
fishermen. Yeah, that was just
preventative. That's not me launching an
armed conflict. me saying that all the
airspace around Venezuela needs to be
shut down because I'm threatening them.
Oh, that's not me launching into a war.
I I'm just being a strong guy. Trump is
trying to make a little bit of distance
between him and Hegsth in the media. He
wants people to think that, oh well,
well, two strikes, but Pete did is too
far. I wouldn't have done that. That was
his decision. He wanted that carried
out. There's a lot of lot of pushing of
the blame to Pete Hegathth. This is the
the clearest break that Trump has made
and he's just quitting on him in terms
of his strategy around this bombing
campaign in international waters. Trump
was backing him up before saying that
this was justified. This was important.
Remember, Trump was posting these
videos. He was sharing the criminal
bombings. Donald Trump was posting his
own war crimes. But now after some
backlash, after Republicans saying we
need to investigate this, and after a
very direct campaign by Mark Kelly to
bring attention to this, and good on
Mark Kelly, Donald Trump's starting to
say, I don't really like how they're
talking about me on TV because again,
it's it's always about TV. Let's be
honest, people. And he's saying, I'm
going to put a there's a little line in
the sand right there, and that's that's
Pete. Pete did that. I wouldn't have
done that. That was Pete's call. Oh, now
you're talking about war crimes. That
was on Pete. We're doing another round
of investigations. That was on Pete. He
is clearly breaking with him. He's
opening the door to throw him under the
bus. He's opening the door to firing
someone. I think Donald Trump wants some
heat off him right now. And I think in a
moment in which he is seeing the lowest
approval rating of his presidency,
he he potentially has another
devastating election loss coming up in
Tennessee. Shout out to Afton Bane on
Tuesday. I think Donald Trump is is
waking up to the fact that maybe a
little shakeup might help him, right?
Maybe that's a little distraction. Maybe
that's something to feed the media.
Maybe that's a look over here and don't
pay attention to Epstein. Don't pay
attention to the economy. Talk about
Pete Hath. That was Pete Hexath's fault.
That that that's what it was. Donald
Trump fired a lot of people in his first
administration and a lot of people
resigned. There was a lot of turnover.
It's been relatively stable for Trump,
right? right? That MAGA has been pretty
pretty locked in, at least in his
administration and Congress. We're
seeing resignations. We're seeing
threats of resignations
for these strikes.
This is one of the issues that has
Republican lawmakers saying, "I don't
know if I want to be here. I got to
defend this guy. I don't know if I want
to be here."
So, is Donald Trump thinking to himself
right now, huh? New Secretary of Defense
on one hand, other hand, keep the drunk
idiot
doing bar crawls on Wednesday nights and
killing people illegally
or
resignation with resignation.
Republicans resign if I keep Pete Hegsth
and then I lose the House and then the
more investigations come or just new
Secretary of Defense. I I think that
Trump would probably lean towards new
Secretary of Defense and getting rid of
Pete. I don't think he has a lot of
loyalty to Pete Hagsth. I think that's
where Donald Trump is leaning right now.
I wouldn't be surprised. And again, I
wouldn't be surprised if a lot of this
was because of Mark Kelly on television
today. That's what drives a lot of
Donald Trump's decision-m. So, on that
note, I think we need to hear more from
Mark Kelly who was just going off on
Trump. Well, first let me let me start
by saying we said something very simple
and non-controversial and the president
of the United States said hang them,
execute them, u prosecute them. In my
case, uh secretary heas said prosecute
him under the uniform code of military
justice for by the way reciting the
uniform code of military justice. It's
obviously ridiculous, but this is an
attempt to silence me, to to get me to
not hold this administration
accountable. We have a president who
doesn't understand the Constitution, who
installed an unqualified Secretary of
Defense. I cannot think of a Secretary
of Defense in the history of our country
that is less qualified than Pete Hexath.
He should not be in this position. He
should have been fired after Signalgate
and now he should be fired again for
this. if this if this is accurate. Um,
so he's not going to get me to back
down. And what but what he is doing is
sending a very chilling message across
our entire nation, not only in the
military, but the civilian workforce.
Who's going to speak up and say anything
if they see something that's unlawful or
see something waste, fraud, and ab
abuse? Why would anyone speak out if
they can go and prosecute try to
prosecute a US senator?
Is it happening?
Well, I I don't know. I mean, I was
notified
I was notified about this through a
tweet, the same tweet that you saw. And
that demonstrates how unserious this
administration is. They care. They care
more about the publicity about this than
the process or the law. I haven't been
notified by the Navy.
By the Navy or the FBI. So, no.
We We got something about from the FBI.
But the thing we received from the FBI,
just like the president said saying that
we should be hanged,
the thing we received from the FBI is
more intimidation.
What did it say?
Well, it just said there was no point of
contact. It had something about uh
coming in for an interview. Um, and the
and the question here should be, you
know, why did the FBI decide to do this?
Or do you think maybe the president told
the FBI director to go after these six
members of Congress? I expect to be
hearing a lot more from Mark Kelly. And
funny enough, very soon I'm going to be
doing a doing an interview with Mark
Kelly. So, actually, if there's anything
specifically you'd like to see me ask
him, feel free to DM me on Instagram, on
Twitter, to to drop a comment below. Um,
there are a lot of questions I'm gonna
have for Senator Kelly. Uh, also just
going to need to shake his hand, tell
him he's badass, cuz he is. But this is
the energy that Democrats need and I
want to see more of it. We're going to
be talking about it and highlighting it
on this show. If you want to support
that, as always, you can hit that
subscribe button, leave a like on this
video. If you stuck around to the end,
drop a blue heart in the comments. Keep
on fighting y'all. Don't let them
silence you. And until next time, I'll
see you

[admin]

Pete Hegseth's "Kill Them All" Order Constitutes a War Crime!
by Glenn Kirschner
Nov 29, 2025

The Washington Post just reported: "Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say" Kill them all." Hegseth's order, and the resulting murders in international waters, violates domestic law, international law, and the law of war.

A statement just issued by the "Former JAGs Working Group" concludes that the killings carried out on Hegseth's orders "are war crimes."

I sat down for a discussion about this latest development with law professor, military law expert, and member of the Former JAGs Working Group Dan Maurer.



Transcript

Hey all, Glen Kirschner here. So friends,
the Washington Post just reported that
regarding these deadly boat strikes in
international waters, Secretary of
Defense Pete Hegsth gave a kill them all
order.
So the only thing left is for Pete Hegth
to be prosecuted for murder.
I just sat down with law professor and
military law expert Dan Mau to talk
about Pete Hegath's
war crimes.
[Music]
All right, welcome everybody. Uh, happy
Saturday. Hey, I hope you all had a
great Thanksgiving and uh are recovering
from eating too much as am I. Um we've
got our friend Dan Mau back. Um law
professor, retired Army Lieutenant
Colonel retiring uh from the US Army Jag
Corps. He taught constitutional law and
criminal law at West Point. He also
taught at the Army's Jag School on the
campus of University of Virginia. He has
become a a frequent flyer here
unfortunately talking about the
continued abuses of Donald Trump Pete
Hegath and the folks who are um deciding
to obey what appear to be clearly
patently unlawful orders. So first of
all happy holiday weekend and welcome
back Dan. I'm I'm so happy that you're
back with us.
Thank you Glenn. Happy post Thanksgiving
to everybody.
I want to start this with uh just
reading a little bit from the new
Washington Post reporting about the
latest travesty. Um the headline is
hegth order on first Caribbean boat
strike officials say kill them all and
just a little bit of the reporting
includes defense secretary Pete Hegsth
gave a spoken directive according to two
people with direct knowledge of the
operation. Quote, "The order was to kill
everybody." Close quote. One of them
said, "A missile screamed off the
Trinidad coast, striking the vehicle and
igniting a blaze from bow to Stern. For
minutes, commanders watched the boat
burning on a live drone feed. As the
smoke cleared, they got a jolt. Two
survivors were clinging to the
smoldering wreck. the special operations
commander overseeing the September 2
attack, the opening salvo in the Trump
administration's war on suspected drug
traffickers in the Western Hemisphere
ordered a second strike to comply with
HEGs instructions. Two people familiar
with the matter said and the two men
were blown apart in the water. Now, Dan,
I saw you post something on LinkedIn and
you said, I'm not going to read much of
it, but quote, "If the reporting here is
accurate, I'm disgusted, appalled, and
angry. Any order to execute these boat
boat strikes on narco terrorists is an
unlawful order that should have been
rejected by the chain of command. And
there is no way to wash clean the taint
of illegality that defines an order to
quote kill everyone, including the
survivors of the first strike clinging
to the side of the sinking boat. You
know, I I think this is so appalling and
it it just it turns our stomachs. But
can you talk a little bit about um the
illegality of what is being reported in
this Washington Post article?
Yeah. Well, I mean, aside from it being
completely immoral and base to to do
that to survivors of a strike, uh
there's a reason why it's illegal under
international law because it's viewed as
beyond the pale. Um so the first thing
to note is that under
well known well-known international law
that goes back not just modern intern
customary international law directing
how you use force abroad says you cannot
give an order for no quarter you know
take no survivors that that's not that's
not lawful under any
any interpretation of the law of armed
and it hasn't been for a very long time.
I mean, this predates the revolution
and it's certainly embedded in the HEG
regulations and in the Geneva
Conventions that we have signed as
treaties and make part of our law. And
it's something that we we train our our
service members as as one of the basic
foundational principles of all of our
don't you don't kill prisoners. You
don't kill what are called or to combat
or out of the fight. French were out of
the fight. That includes PS, includes
wounded and sick, and it includes the
shipwrecked. It includes survivors.
And there are special protections that
you give to shipwrecked crews. Whether
you're fighting a law enforcement
campaign or you're fighting an armed
conflict, when there were survivors in
the sea, you actually have a duty to go
rescue them. Not just don't kill them,
but to also rescue them. That's an
affirmative obligation to save their
life, not to take their life. It's easy
to to kill him. Clearly, we did that.
But I don't understand what what really
bothered at a core core level is how
that order, that kill everyone order was
interpreted by a three-star admiral at
the time. That admiral commanding J-C is
now the commander fourstar of special
operations command. A former Navy Seal.
Well, I guess you're always a Navy Seal.
former commander of Steel Team 6 said,
"Launch the second missile because those
two shipwrecked crew members might get
picked up by their fellow narot
terrorists and continue trafficking
drugs. One, highly unlikely. Two, that
doesn't matter. It just doesn't matter."
And he should have known that. He
absolutely should have known that.
Whether there was a jag in the room or
not, that's basic. That's like how do
you shoot your weapon basic. And that to
me is an impeachable offense for
Hegsath. It is a court marshalable
offense for the admiral. And I take no
joy in saying that as a former retired
officer to to say that there's any blame
here on the military, but there is. They
followed a patently awful order to kill
those
drug runners, assuming they're drug
runners. Even if they're the worst drug
runners in the world, even if they're
armed, if they're not shooting at the US
forces at the time, they are not
targetable. In fact, they had to be
saved, picked up, and rescued, not just
blown to pieces, as the reporting
indicates. It is so far illegal that I I
I cannot understand how someone that
senior could have allowed that to
happen. and all down the chain of
command. And it might have been a three
star to a drone operator or someone
firing a missile from a plane. Who
knows? It might have been two steps, but
both of those steps should have been a a
firm rejection. No, we're not going to
kill them. Bottom line. And they should
have put their stars on the table. You
want to fire me for that? Fine. But I'm
not doing that. That's what should have
happened and that's what didn't happen.
And and who knows, maybe it happened
multiple times. That was just the first
strike. It may have happened every other
time since then. So clearly a a
massively important breaking story.
Incredibly bad news for those who
thought that like me who thought that
the military would ultimately do the
right thing in the face of a clearly
manifestly patently unlawful order that
they would reject it because that's what
they're trained to do. It's a
professional norm. It's a professional
obligation and it's not hard to spot the
blatantly patently unlawful orders and
this was one of those and so they should
have rejected it. So Dan, let me ask you
this. I know the challenges of
explaining the inexplicable in the Trump
era. I've been a legal analyst since I
retired from the Department of Justice
in 2018 when Trump's illegality was
already on full display. And I I feel
your frustration and I experience the
same frustration when people ask me,
"Well, h how is this lawful?" Well, it's
not. What do we do about it? Well,
that's challenging because we don't
have, you know, a lot of mechanisms
right now given Hegat as the Secretary
of Defense, Donald Trump as president,
given Pam Bondi as attorney general. We
don't have a lot of mechanisms to hold
folk accountable for their lawlessness.
But, but let me ask you this, and I know
I'm kind of asking you to try to explain
the inexplicable.
What what pressures do you think are at
play on the military chain of command
when they know better? I was only on
active duty 6 and a half years as an
army jag. I know better. These career
military members and certainly like
yourself a career army jag. We all know
better. What pressures are do you
suspect are at play in having them
refuse to as you say put their stars on
the table and and decline to defy these
unlawful orders?
Yeah. Uh so I I think and this is
speculation um and it is fairly
inexplicable but I think there are two
uh forces at play here. One is uh
Congress's absolute inability to hold
the executive branch in check uh for
various reasons. Uh that some of the
Democrats, as you know, are now being
louder about it, but they don't have the
floor. Um and they're being accused of
being traitors when they do speak up. Um
but you don't have Republicans coming
out on Mas. Ironically enough, MGT or
MJT did, but the majority of the
Republicans are not pushing back on on
clear illegality from the administration
in any domain. Whether it's domestic
deployment of troops, whether it's
birthright citizenship, whether it's
attacking boats in the Caribbean or the
Pacific, they're just not pushing back
and they're trying to justify or at
least not talk about it. If Congress was
doing its job correctly, they would hold
the executive branch to account. There
are many mechanisms for doing that. Uh
so that's one one influence I think
allowing this to happen. The other one I
fear is what we had been talking about
really since February when he fired the
the senior army and air force TJAGs the
judge advocates general the leading
lawyers in uniform in the Pentagon. That
sent a chilling message throughout the
JAG cores all the way down about don't
be a roadblock because that's that's
what he's justification was. they'd be
roadblocks to implementing policy. And
so you now have more compliant or at
least quieter JAGs. That's one point.
Point two is he also fired the chairman
of the joint chiefs. He fired the chief
of naval operations. He purged for lack
of a better word. Senior commanders.
You see uh Southcom's admiral uh their
their uh commanding officer a few weeks
ago decided to retire early evidently
because of objections to the boat
strikes. This is what happens when you
purge. You end up with what's left,
which is those who are okay with what
the policy is. They're okay with pushing
the boundaries of what's lawful. They're
okay with it. You don't have the people
who should be standing up because
they're no longer in uniform. They're
not there. And that's exactly what we
thought would be the risk when you start
firing the senior leaders for doing
their job. What you're left with, I'm
afraid to say, are yes men and yes
women. I can't say that's the case for
every single bad decision that gets
implemented, but I think in this
particular case where the where the the
strike was so clearly unlawful, I have
to believe that the admiral believed
that he was doing the right thing, that
he was doing what's lawful or at least
believed the law supported him or at
least believed President Trump would
immunize him in some way and therefore
would be okay with it. He's not going to
risk his four stars. Maybe he I'm
assuming he knew he was up for four
stars and was going to go to SOCOM.
didn't want to risk that by pushing
back. Now, where is he? He's got a
promotion. So, maybe that was an
influencing uh factor as well. But I
think it's those two things. I think
what you're left with with is an
atmosphere of fear within the Department
of Defense. Um either fear or compliance
because they agree with him or they are
afraid of being threatened by him. but
him being Trump and Congress not acting
not acting with its lawful
constitutional authority to hold the
executive branch in check. And of
course, all of this, at least this
reporting is coming on the heels of six
members of Congress, uh, including
Senator Mark Kelly, um, saying that
soldiers have an obligation to, uh,
refuse to obey unlawful orders, which
frankly is straight out of the uniform
code of military justice, the manual for
courts marshall, you know, that's sort
of ingrained in us first in officer
basic training for me and then again at
the army jag school. So talk a little
bit about what these military members
are risking if they actually obey uh
excuse me obey these law unlawful
orders.
Yeah. So the law here is kind of tricky
and that's unfortunate and Congress has
a remedy. They could they could fix
this. I'm actually working on an article
now. Hopefully it'll come out in a few
days that explains some of this why
Congress can get involved. But the
bottom line is when a when a member of
the armed services does something upon
an order, they've been ordered to
execute some mission and it turns out
that that mission was unlawful in some
way. Um they can raise if they're
prosecuted for that bad thing that they
do, they whether it's, you know, killing
somebody or taking their money or
hurting them, assaulting them, whatever
it may be, they're prosecuted under the
court marshal system for that crime.
They can raise a defense and say, "I was
obeying orders." Even if that order was
unlawful. They have a defense. The judge
has to buy it, but they can raise it.
I'm not saying it's very successful, but
it can be raised. That is foreclosed.
However, they can't raise it if it's a
patently unlawful order. Okay? That
means it's so obvious on its face that
an ordinary, reasonable, prudent person
would know you can't do that. like go
take out the prisoner back behind the
shed and shoot him in the head. Uh or
you know go go rape that hut of women.
You obviously you can't do that. It's
anyone would know that's unlawful under
any system of law. So following that you
can't say obedience to order. But if
it's not unlawful they can raise an
illegal order. this situation striking
shipwrecked survivors of a missile
strike when they pose no no not even
close to imminent threat to any US
forces or to anybody else. They're
barely clinging to life. Killing them is
to give them no quarter. killing them is
to
ignore centuries of basic
honorable fighting. As honorable as
fighting can be, uh there's a martial
code um implicit within the military law
system as well. And how we fight, we
fight with honor to maintain our
legitimacy. Killing innocent people, one
is clearly wrongful and illegal, but
killing prisoners or killing those who
cannot defend themselves, is a crime
because it's immoral, even under the the
much more permissive moral code of being
a service member in combat. So what's
interesting, Glenn, is the
administration frames the boat attacks
as a non- international armed conflict,
a NYAK, which means the laws of armed
conflict apply. And the laws of armed
conflict here could not be clearer that
this strike, the second strike on the
survivors would be a crime. It's a crime
under any system, but definitely under
the very law that they say that we're
following.
So, the Trump administration is
endangering, you know, not only people
in international waters, uh, but it's
endangering our military members in any
number of ways and by extension, I think
it endangers our national security
ultimately. So, let's finish with this
because I saw this press release. I
think it was issued today by the former
JAGs working group and it has about a
three or four page analysis. It is the
analysis that you just laid out and it
comes to the conclusion. It say it says
the bottom line since orders to kill
survivors of an attack at sea are
patently illegal, anyone who issues or
follows such orders can and should be
prosecuted for war crimes, murder or
both. So talk a little bit about the
former JAG working group and again how
it came to that decision.
Uh yes, so I'm full disclosure I am a
member of that former JAG working group.
Um it's more than a handful but not a
huge contingent of retired uh uh JAG
officers from different services. Um I
don't think I'm at liberty to disclose
who all is in it other than myself. Um,
but I'll just say that uh I I've been
impressed from day one and the group
started kind of very informally back in
February when those TJs were fired and
and the idea was how do we get the
message out that this is dangerous that
this is wrong and dangerous and here are
the consequences that we might see. One
of you know disobeying the the the law
of war was one of the consequences that
we foresaw way back in February. And so
what this group has been doing is
communicating with members of Congress
um both Republican and Democrat. the
professional staffs on the armed
services committees. Um they've been
writing a lot of op-eds um and articles
in places like just security and lawfare
trying to get the message out to a broad
community of of people who who are
listening who care and who are in a
position to do something about it. And
by that primarily we mean members of the
military that don't disobey or I'm sorry
don't obey illegal orders and disobey uh
unlawful orders. By the way, me saying
that is exactly what Senator Kelly just
said. And according to Hegsth, that
would be court marshalable offense for
me, a retired army officer. Um, so
there's that. Um so yes to your point he
has he meaning Trump and Hegs
are putting service members at risk um
for criminal prosecution but even longer
term the institution itself is at risk
of losing its legitimacy losing its
credibility with the American public
losing its its credibility with our
allies and partners who we train by the
way on following the laws of armed
conflict. I I know that because I did
that overseas several times. Um, we
train them on how we supposedly fight
and that is to comply with the laws of
armed conflict and we tell them why we
do it, how it's practical and it's moral
and it's the law.
Can't make that argument as strongly
these days and that is a true shame and
puts puts us uh puts the US military's
legitimacy um and credibility ultimately
uh on the chopping block.
So the last question and I fear I know
the answer. Um do you see any vehicle
any mechanism any organization that can
stop in step in and try to put a stop to
this that can bring some accountability
um to to what we see going on the abuses
of military authority.
Yeah. Well yes Congress Congress if it
does its job right Congress can hold
hearings. They can in start
investigations. They can put pressure on
DOJ to do its job impartially, which of
course I have I have lots of skepticism
and doubt about. Um, but it can put
pressure on on in uh on the executive
branch in other ways, withholding
promotions, withholding appointments.
Um, if it if it cares, if it truly cares
about the rule of law and not about
partisan winning over the the
opposition, then it should care about
this very much because if they ignore
it, they are just handing the reigns
over to a president who doesn't care
about how the troops are used, doesn't
care what risk they're put under, and
doesn't care whether he's obeying the
law or not. And if they hold true to the
oath that they swore when they became
members of Congress, that's what they
ought to be doing.
And and the word if is doing a lot of
heavy lifting in that calculation. If
Congress cares about the rule of law,
perhaps more than they care about, you
know, not displeasing Donald Trump and
perhaps alienating
um his base in the upcoming midterm
elections. you know, that word if is
doing a lot of heavy lifting. I I
couldn't agree with you more, though.
So, Dan, um, where can people find your
work? Um, I know you're on Substack, but
tell everybody where else they can find
you.
Yeah, at Politics by Other Means or just
my name, Dan Mau. Um, I'm on Blue Sky.
I'm on X, but not as much these days.
And I'm on uh LinkedIn. Uh, so you can
find me do a lot of posting on on all of
those uh platforms.
All right. And thank you for always
being available to jump on talk about
these updates. Um, enjoy the rest of
your weekend and I'm sure we're going to
be talking again soon.
Thanks, Len. Take care.
Thanks. Thanks, everybody. We'll see you
later tonight.
[Music]

[admin]

PROOF Leaks Erika Kirk PLOTTED On Charlie For YEARS. Erika’s Mother ARRANGED Their Marriage
Statecraft
Dec 4, 2025

But who IS Erika Kirk really? Well, get ready because the biggest bombshell about Erika’s past just dropped, and it literally changes EVERYTHING we've been told about her marriage to Charlie!

So there’s this video that just surfaced from 2015, from one of Trump’s early political rallies in Phoenix, Arizona. And there’s someone in the crowd who looks exactly…and I mean SHOCKINGLY similar to Erika Kirk. And next to her, there’s someone who looks a whole lot like Erika’s mother, Lori Frantzve…

But it gets stranger: Erika’s not alone with her mother….She appears to be there with a man and a little girl.

So is that actually Erika Kirk? And if it is, who's the man? Who’s the child? What is the relationship here?



Transcript

You're going to have the real ones and
the fake ones that are standing in the
pulpit and the ones that are on fire for
the Lord. You know,
he literally blinked and probably
thought he was raptured and looked
around and was like, "Where's everybody
else?" He blinked and he was with the
Lord. The enemy would love for me to be
angry.
He would love it. Almost like
I'm so glad I'm not you.
But who is Erica Kirk really? Well, get
ready because the biggest bombshell
about Erica's past just dropped and it
literally changes everything we've been
told about her marriage to Charlie. So,
there's this video that just surfaced
from 2015 from one of Trump's early
political rallies in Phoenix, Arizona.
And there's someone in the crowd who
looks exactly, and I mean shockingly,
similar to Erica Kirk. And next to her,
there's someone who looks a whole lot
like Erica's mother, Lorie France. But
it gets stranger. Erica's not alone with
her mother. She appears to be there with
a man and a little girl. So, is that
actually Erica Kirk? And if it is, who's
the man? Who's the child? What is the
relationship here? So, this video is
still on YouTube and it's titled Donald
Trump visits Phoenix, Arizona on July
11th, 2015. Issues impacting America.
But, weirdly, the comments have been
disabled. Now, watching the clip, look
way in the back, top row, dead center.
There's a woman with blonde hair wearing
what looks like a very light reddish
pink dress. At first glance, looks a lot
like Erica.
[Applause]
We have a situation
that's absolutely out of control. We
have incompetent politicians, not only
the president.
And then next to this woman that looks
like Erica, there's a man in a black and
white plaid button-up shirt with a black
tie. And next to them is a little girl.
And if that doesn't already pull you in,
there's another figure who looks very
similar to Erica's mother, Lorie Fransi.
Some people don't get it. And I don't
think they'll be in office much longer.
I
We are going to make this country so
great again.
We are going
So, are we looking at Erica, her mother,
and a family situation we don't know
about? A niece, a goddaughter, the
daughter of a guy she was dating at the
time, her own daughter? Now, there's
nothing inherently wrong about being at
a rally in 2015 with someone you were
dating. There's nothing sinister about
having a child before meeting Charlie.
The only reason this becomes complicated
is because of what comes after, which
we'll get into in a second. But first,
let's go back to the video and jump
ahead a bit. Trump is speaking and there
they are again. Blonde hair, pink dress,
plaid shirt, man. This time it's even
clearer. And tell me you don't see it.
The hair flip, the posture, the
expressions. Those are mannerisms we've
all seen from Erica before.
You know, these are real knowledgeable
people. They don't know anything.
Then they said he'll never file his FPC
paper if I file that two weeks. They
said, "Oh, wow."
Yeah.
And they said
he'll never file his financials. The
resemblance is too strong to just
ignore, especially when you look at the
still shots. In each of these shots, the
blonde woman and the man are clearly
together. They're leaning into each
other, reacting together, positioned
together. The child is physically
interacting with the woman, hugging her,
clinging to her like a kid does with
someone familiar, not a random stranger
at a political rally. Check out the
interaction between the couple and the
child. They're clearly there together
and they look like a family.
And by the way, cameras just like you
have all these cameras. We're live
television all over the place like we
are now. And he said, "Donald, I had
calls from Hispanic people."
Now, when you compare this with Erica's
older photos and videos from this time
period, especially the ones with her
mother, the resemblance is undeniable.
Here with Erica, Miss Arizona.
Hi.
So, Erica,
what are some of your favorite products
from Marine Cosmetics?
I absolutely love Lifeguard lover,
mostly because it has that peachy bronzy
feel to it.
But here's where it gets extra tangled.
So, in that same Trump rally video, if
you look directly below Erica and the
man in the plaid shirt, there's someone
in the gray suit who looks exactly like
Tyler Boer. Yes, the Turning Point Tyler
Boer, the same guy who connected Erica
to Charlie Kirk and set up their job
interview/date.
Tyler became TPUSA's chief operating
officer in 2017. And just months later,
he arranged a meeting between Charlie
and Erica. I went to Turning Point's
office opening for their first building
and Tyler was he runs Turning Point
Action now and he said, "You need to
meet the CEO." I said, "Okay, great."
Met him very quickly, shook his hand,
said, "Hi, nice to meet you." Neither of
us thought anything of it. Looking back
now, he apparently sat down with Tyler
and said, "We need to hire or Tyler
said, "We need to hire her." And
interestingly, this meeting happened
after Erica came back from a pilgrimage
with her mom and spotted Charlie at the
airport. Although she claimed she had no
idea who he was at the time. But just
know that nothing is by mistake.
Nothing.
I will never forget the time I was in
Israel with my husband. Well, not with
that was the second time, but the first
time with my mother on a pilgrimage
and I was standing in the ticket line
and I remember looking behind me and in
the snake of the ticket line was a guy
who looked very familiar. I had no idea
who he was. And I told my mom, "This guy
looks so familiar." And as a typical
mother, she said, "Go and say hi."
No, we were late for our flight and I'm
not going to come off like a crazy
person with a That's just weird.
that ended up being Charlie.
[Applause]
Nothing is by coincidence. Now, did I
did we know that that No, not until we
were like 3 months into our relationship
and looking at time stamps seeing that
both of us were in Israel at the same
time.
But nothing is by coincidence. Now,
going back to that Trump rally video. So
now you have someone who looks like
Erica, someone who looks like Erica's
mother, a man and a little girl
interacting closely with them, and Tyler
Boer standing right beneath them 3 years
before Charlie and Erica supposedly met
for the first time in 2018. Now remember
that Erica won Miss Arizona in 2012 when
the pageant was still owned by Trump. So
there was already a line of connection
there. but appearing at a 2015 Trump
rally with people who look like family.
That's not just a line of connection.
That's direct overlap. Now, let's talk
ages. Erica would have been 26 in July
2015. She supposedly met Charlie at 29
in 2018 and they married in 2021. Now,
if she already had a child, biological,
adopted, stepchild, anything, there's
nothing scandalous about it. But given
how clean and curated their public how
we met story is, people are naturally
curious if there's more to her biography
than what's been publicly stated. There
were even claims made by some anonymous
sources that Erica was married
previously to someone named Derek
Chelvig, who was allegedly involved with
Erica's charity, Romanian Angels. And
again, none of this would be especially
weird unless you buy into the official
version of how these people met. If all
these individuals already knew each
other years earlier and were all
connected through Trump circles, that
heavily contradicts the whole we met by
fate in 2018 narrative. And even if you
personally think the blonde woman in
that video isn't Erica, the presence of
someone who looks exactly like her
mother, Lorie, paired with Tyler Bo,
you're right below them creates a
pattern that's hard to dismiss as a
coincidence. Now, let's talk about Lorie
for a second because that's where the
rabbit hole gets even weirder. See,
Lorie France isn't just a mother and a
Trump supporter. This woman has deep
ties to the military and the
intelligence community through her work.
Erica's even talked about this herself
in an old interview where she said her
mom moved to Arizona for a business
opportunity tied to her work with the
Department of Homeland Security to be
closer to government contracts and
defense work.
Can I ask a question? This might be off
topic. How did you how did your mom
choose Phoenix? So, she chose to move to
Phoenix uh from Ohio because there was
more of a um an opportunity for a female
business owner out here. Um especially
from the standpoint of she was getting
involved with uh the government, so
Homeland Security and Department of
Defense. And so, she had other business
partners that were out here that were
already in that industry. Um even one
that was a mentor of hers. So, it was it
was really convenient to be able to come
all together in one place. It turns out
Lorie started several tech and defense
companies, including one called AZ Tech
International and subsidiaries GTK
Industries and E3 Tech Group, all of
which worked with the Department of
Defense, Department of Homeland
Security, and the Intel community. On
top of that, according to Internet
Sleuths, Erica's parents, Lori and Kent
France, both worked on projects overseas
through their military contracts. Rathon
partnered with Israel's Raphael to build
the Iron Dome missile defense system
because in 2025, Donald Trump himself
pushed for building what he called a
gold dome over America, modeled directly
after Israel's Iron Dome.
So, just like Erica herself said,
nothing is by coincidence. In fact, we
could be looking at a bunch of actors on
stage. But here's the real question. How
much did Charlie actually know about
Erica's past? Did he genuinely believe
fate brought them together? And the
biggest question of all, did the same
people he trusted, the ones he
considered family, have anything to do
with what ultimately happened to him?
Drop your thoughts in the comments
because this story is nowhere near
finished. And honestly, it feels like
Erica's closet might still have a few
more skeletons waiting for their

[admin]

We got him.
Adam Mockler
Dec 9, 2025 The Adam Mockler Show



Transcript

All of these far faright losers hate
women. They hate themselves and they'll
never touch power because we are going
to be here to push back. I've been
talking a lot on this channel about the
rise of these far faright movements.
Obviously, we have far-right populism
inside the White House and the Trump
administration right now, and Steven
Miller and the people around Trump are
very far-right, but I've been talking a
lot about the Nick Fuentes movements
because this is something that's been
sprouting up online and is a new strain
that's been normalized and emboldened by
Donald Trump, but it's a new level of
anti-semitism and hatred that is out
there openly. Well, Pierce Morgan, Piers
Morgan, who, you know, I've been on his
show. I've disagreed with him before,
but overall, he's a pretty good
interviewer. He's good at holding
people's feet to the fire. He had an
interview with Nick Fuentes where he
exposed all of his worst deficiencies,
bigotries, flaws, the hatred of women,
hatred of himself. And honestly, if you
guys ever have any questions about the
entire Nick Fuentes movement, hit me up
because I've spent a lot of time over
the past two years studying the rise of
this dude. And this is the this is the
most I've seen him at the ropes. Piers
Morgan genuinely had him looking like an
absolute nerd, just admitting that he's
misogynistic. He doesn't like women.
He's never really touched or kissed a
woman or slept with a woman. This is a
loser who basically hides his beliefs
when he does these more sitdown
interviews. And then he goes on his
podcast and says this extreme extreme
[ __ ] about women, about black people. He
has these extreme views that he is
trying to hide and mask. But Pierce
Morgan had this uh strategy where he
said, you know, I'm gonna play a clip of
you and then I'm gonna ask you about it
and not let you wiggle out of this clip
because there's so many clips of Fentes
saying racist stuff, misogynistic stuff.
Let's watch this clip of Nick Fuentes
admitting that he just doesn't like to
be around women whatsoever. I mean, it's
really telling. I I'll break this down
after, but I remember talking to my
friend a few months back and we've
always been watching the rise of people
like Charlie Kirk, people like Nick,
we're young dudes. We grow up in these
spaces and we've seen this all, you
know, explode while we're living in
these spaces. And I said to him, I think
Nick Fuentes genuinely might just be
gay. Like the way he speaks about women,
the way he speaks about waking up next
to a woman being the grossest thing you
could possibly think of or like going to
sleep next to a woman wanting to make
him puke. I just if you're gay, just say
it.
To clear up one of the many theories
about you. I have no idea what the
answer is and you haven't got an answer.
But are you actually attracted to women?
I am attracted to women.
You're not gay.
No. But I will say that women are very
difficult to be around.
Okay.
So there's that.
And do you think they should have the
right to vote?
I do not. No. Absolutely not.
They should stay at home.
Well, yeah. Absolutely.
So basically, you're just a misogynist
old dinosaur, aren't you? For a for a
young guy. I mean, I know I'm the
boomer. I know I'm the boomer here, but
actually you're a 27y old dinosaur,
aren't you? Aren't you, Nick Fuentes?
All women, all women are annoying. All
women grow old. They all get fat.
Says the guy. Have you ever had sex?
No. Absolutely not.
Wow. Says the guy who's never got laid.
I mean, that actually explains a lot of
his views on women. He has a lot of
antisocial behavior that can be embodied
in a lot of young men. Never slept or
probably even touched a woman, which
people have problems. I get that. But
then he uses that to channel it into
hatred. uh to his audience every single
day. Here's the thing about Nick
Fuentes. I think a lot of people
underestimate how seriously we should
take him, but at the same time, these
folks are so incredibly beatable because
of how much of a loser they are. They're
all just losers. For example, so here's
why you shouldn't underestimate him.
Remember that young Republican group
chat about 2 months ago when all of
those 20 to 30year-old uh Republican
operatives and state senators were
caught in the group chat saying they
love Hitler. Some of them were even 35,
36 years old. They were saying they love
gas chambers. Nick Fuentes is trying to
create that at scale. He's telling his
followers to gain positions of power
within the Republican party to go into
universities, to go to Turning Point
USA, the Heritage Foundation, any sort
of law school, law firm, top board at
these companies and hide what they
actually believe. Hide their white
supremacist Nazi belief so they can all
sort of activate one day. I mean, we saw
this in the Young Republican group chat.
These are beliefs that are genuinely
actually growing. So, we need to be
combating this on a daily basis. But on
the other side of that, these people are
kind of losers. Like, this isn't an
actual popular ideology among young men.
Young men don't actually on mass just
hate women in this fashion and not want
women to vote. This is not a popular
ideology. At the same time, there are
reports that a lot of Nick Fuentes's
popularity is boosted by bots online.
And don't get me wrong, like white
supremacy is something we actually have
to combat. This is a real ideology. But
he is boosted a lot by bots. He's then
asked and pressed about him talk like
loving Hitler
jokes. Although I haven't ascertained
yet whether you are joking when you say
that Hitler was very [ __ ] cool. Are
you joking or do you actually think he
was very [ __ ] cool? The the most
genocidal monster of the last 150 years.
Yeah. The the thing is my generation
we're just done with the pearl
clutching. You know,
you might be, but then your generation
hasn't gone through what Danny
Finkelstein's family went through. So
maybe maybe the pearl clutching has a
way to go for families whose whose
family members go.
Yeah, we we got all that. We you know me
me mom me mom like we're you know I
don't even know who this person is. Why
is this person talking to me? This old
British guy is saying me mom got killed
by Hitler. He doesn't find it funny when
you say Hitler's very [ __ ]
I don't care. I know you don't care.
That's fine. You don't have to care.
And Nick Fuentes came across is really
immature and skittish during this
interview. In prior interviews, he's
done a few things. Either he hides his
true beliefs and tones them down to try
to appeal to a broader audience and then
he goes back on his real podcast and
says racist [ __ ] or he just trolls his
way through it. But in this one, he kind
of tries to take on this troll demeanor.
He kind of tries to troll Pierce Morgan,
but it doesn't really come across that
clean. He just seems like a racist,
petulant, misogynistic child. And it
doesn't seem like anything he's saying
is landing.
But he does care.
Does that guy care about America? Does
that guy care about me and my country
and my family? No.
He cares what you, a prominent
conservative in America, has to say
about Adolf Hitler. Now, what do you
mean by Hitler is very [ __ ] cool?
Because I think he's very [ __ ] a
monster. Oh,
that and that's a clip. I think he's
very [ __ ] a monster. Do you hear
yourself? I mean, can we all grow up? I
do. Can we all grow up?
He murdered 12 million people.
He murdered 12 million people. What is
very [ __ ] cool about that?
Tell me.
Uh, the edits. It's just cool. The the
uniforms, the parades, the it's it's
cool. as a guy, you look at World War II
and it's fascinating and it's
interesting and it's compelling and it's
cool and you know, we're just tired of
saying these kinds of things. We want to
talk like real people and give our
honest opinions. Real people don't talk
like this. Real people don't believe
that Hitler was cool. Real people don't
believe that women shouldn't vote. He
does not represent a real massive
movement that is swelling up in the
United States. He represents a fringe
group of young men, somewhat mainly just
young men who are antisocial, who are
isolated and who are now trying to grow
their movement. So again, don't
underestimate him, but at the same time,
the the movement is made of mainly just
like antisocial losers.
And then we and then we literally get an
old Jewish guy from England who's going
to say, "Oh, that very funny, mate. Me
mom." And it's like, "Shut up." Like,
you know, no one is in favor of
genocide. So, let's just get that out of
the way. We're not
Didn't you just say Hitler was really
effing cool? This is me warning
Republicans on CNN about Nick Fuentes.
Take a look.
He targeted his anger was to have him on
his podcast.
Wait, so he was so enraged he decided to
have a friendly interview with Nick
Fuentes. The problem, listen, the
problem is not that he held the
interview. It's that he normalized this
type of ideology. I think the Republican
party is for the first time being forced
to face the monster that they've created
in Nick Fuentes. Throughout my entire
youth, I've watched Donald Trump
normalize not Nick Fentes's rhetoric,
but a type of extremist rhetoric that
the US has never seen before. Now, that
is manifesting in the GOP, or at least
Tucker Carlson and big wings of the GOP,
welcoming in Tucker Carlson is welcoming
in somebody who believes the Holocaust
didn't happen, or he thinks if it did
happen, it was a good thing. He thinks
that black people deserve less rights.
Women deserve less rights. You can't say
that about Donald Trump.
The Republicans do not
about Jewish people with Donald Trump.
That's what I'm saying.
He wore a yamaker at his daughter's
wedding. The way that Donald Trump
speaks about the Democratic party, the
way that Donald Trump speaks about
people who disagree with him has
normalized this extremist rhetoric. He
said that we were gnats who need to be
taken care of in front of the military.
But the point is a lot of young people
are being sucked into this Nick Fentes
pipeline. I don't think the Republican
party, the old guard is ready for what's
about to smack them in the face.
That is that is very true. Continue.
Not in favor of a holocaust or genocide.
Do you think if half your family you
think if half your family had been wiped
out by very [ __ ] cool Hitler, you'd
still think he was very [ __ ] cool? Or
would you think that actually he was a
despicable monster who murdered 12
million people who targeted people
because they were disabled or Jewish or
Romany Egypy or whatever it may be and
that he systematically destroyed people,
incinerated them in gas chambers. Do you
think that you would find it very
[ __ ] cool if your family had been
through that? Or do you think you would
find it very [ __ ] disgusting and
perhaps moderate the number of times you
you laugh about it or want to joke about
it?
Yeah, Nick Fuentes just comes across as
a sniveling little kid. There's nothing
substantive or convincing here, unless
you're like 14 years old. Even then, you
can see that he's clearly losing the
debate the entire time. I mean, the
Holocaust is uniquely important.
Throughout the interview, Nick Fuentes
keeps asking why why should I care about
the Holocaust? Why is it any different
than any other tragedy? The Holocaust is
uniquely important because number one,
it's pretty recent, like 80 years ago.
And it was a it was a developed country
committing an industrial level genocide
with actual built up like ovens and
actual builtup industrial machines.
There have been genocides throughout
history, but not a machinery conducted
genocide in a developed country at a
scale of that level. That was new and
that is recent. And it was targeting
mainly one ethnicity, which is not good.
So, I'm going to leave it there. If you
appreciate these breakdowns, drop a
like, subscribe. I'll see you all in the
next one. Peace out.

[admin]

Rep. Al Green makes case for impeachment with warning from former Republican VP
Rep. Al Green
Dec 5, 2025

Washington DC, U.S. House of Representatives, Thursday, December 4, 2025. Rep. Al Green highlights warning about Trump’s threat to the Republic from former Republican Vice President as support for case for impeachment



Transcript

MR. GREEN: THANK YOU.
AND STILL I RISE, MR. SPEAKER.
A VERY PROUD, LIBERATED
DEMOCRAT.
UNBOUGHT.
UNBOSSED.
AND UNAFRAID.
AND I RAISE TODAY, MR. SPEAKER,
TO ADDRESS A QUESTION THAT MANY
ARE POSING.
AND A QUESTION THAT I THOUGHT I
SHOULD ANSWER PUBLICLY SO ALL
WOULD UNDERSTAND.
THE QUESTION IS, WHY AM I MOVING
TO BRING IMPEACHMENT, AGAIN,
AGAINST THE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
THE ANSWER WILL BE BETTER
EXPLAINED WHEN THE ARTICLES OF
IMPEACHMENT ARE PRESENTED.
HOWEVER, I DO BELIEVE THAT IT IS
NECESSARY TO GIVE SOME
INDICATION TODAY AND POSSIBLY AT
A LATER TIME AS TO WHY THIS IS
SO IMPORTANT.
WHY WOULD I DO SUCH A THING?
MR. SPEAKER, I -- I AGREE WITH
VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY.
I AGREE WITH HIM, I AGREE WITH A
STATEMENT HE HAS MADE.
YES, VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY
REPRESENTS THE REPUBLIC PARTY OR
HE DID WHEN HE WAS VICE
PRESIDENT.
AND EVERYONE KNOWS THAT I'M A
DEMOCRAT.
BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE
CAN'T AGREE ON SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT AND GREAT ISSUES OF
OUR TIME.
ONE OF THE GREAT ISSUES OF OUR
TIME IS BEFORE US NOW AND I'D
LIKE TO READ THE WORDS OF VICE
PRESIDENT CHENEY, WORDS THAT I
AGREE WITH, MR. SPEAKER.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY HAS
INDICATED, AND IF I MAY USE MY
POINTER, HE HAS INDICATED ON
SEPTEMBER 6 OF 2024, THIS WAS
PUBLISHED, HE INDICATED, IN OUR
NATION'S 248-YEAR HISTORY, THERE
HAS NEVER BEEN AN INDIVIDUAL WHO
IS A GREATER THREAT TO OUR
REPUBLIC THAN DONALD TRUMP.
LET ME PAUSE FOR JUST A MOMENT.
I WOULD LIKE TO HIGHLIGHT THIS
LANGUAGE.
AN INDIVIDUAL.
ONE PERSON.
WHO IS A GREATER THREAT TO OUR
REPUBLIC, IMPORTANT STATEMENT,
REPUBLIC, THAN DONALD TRUMP.
IN 248 YEARS.
I'LL COME BACK TO THESE IN JUST
A MOMENT.
HE TRIED TO STEAL THE LAST
ELECTION.
NOW THIS WAS SEPTEMBER OF 2024,
SO IT'S THE ELECTION PRIOR TO
SEPTEMBER OF 2024.
HE TRIED TO STEAL THE LAST
ELECTION.
USING LIES AND VIOLENCE TO KEEP
HIMSELF IN POWER.
KEEP HIMSELF IN POWER AFTER THE
VOTERS HAD REJECTED HIM.
HE CAN NEVER BE TRUSTED WITH
POWER AGAIN.
I AGREE WITH THIS.
AS CITIZENS, WE EACH HAVE A DUTY
TO PUT COUNTRY ABOVE
PARTISANSHIP, TO DEFEND --
ACTUALLY HE SAYS TO PUT COUNTRY
ABOVE PARTISANSHIP.
TO DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION.
NOW LET'S WALK BACK THROUGH THIS
WITH EMPHASIS ON CERTAIN THINGS.
ONE INDIVIDUAL, DONALD TRUMP, IS
A GREATER THREAT TO THE REPUBLIC
THAN ANY OTHERS.
NEVER BEFORE A PERSON WHO HAS
BEEN A GREATER THREAT THAN
DONALD TRUMP.
WHY IS HE A GREATER THREAT?
WELL, YOU FIRST HAVE TO
UNDERSTAND IF YOU DON'T, THAT WE
HAVE A REPUBLIC.
A REPUBLIC IS GOVERNMENT BY THE
PUBLIC.
BUT IT IS DONE BY AND THROUGH
REPRESENTATION.
REPRESENTATIVES.
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
REPRESENTATIVES.
THE SENATE.
THE REPUBLIC SPEAKS THROUGH
REPRESENTATIVES.
WE HAVE A REPUBLIC AND HE
INDICATES THAT THIS PRESIDENT IS
A GREAT THREAT TO
REPRESENTATIONAL GOVERNMENT.
TO THE REPUBLIC.
WELL, LET'S LOOK AT THIS.
HE, DONALD TRUMP, DOESN'T
RESPECT THE SEPARATION OF
POWERS.
HE BELIEVES THAT THE JUDICIARY
SHOULD AGREE WITH HIM AND THE
JUDICIARY DOES NOT AGREE HE HAS
AS MUCH AS SAID THEY SHOULD BE
IMPEACHED.
SO EMPHATIC WAS HE ABOUT THIS
IMPEACHMENT, THAT THE CHIEF
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAD
TO CALL HIM OUT PUBLICLY.
DIDN'T USE HIS NAME BUT WE ALL
KNEW THAT HE WAS SPEAKING TO THE
PRESIDENT AT THE TIME, PRESIDENT
DONALD TRUMP.
CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME
COURT REMINDED THE PRESIDENT
THAT IN THIS COUNTRY WE HAVE A
HISTORY OF APPEALING DECISIONS
OF THE COURTS.
WE DON'T IMPEACH JUDGES BECAUSE
WE DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR
DECISIONS.
WE APPEAL THESE DECISIONS.
HE DOESN'T RESPECT SEPARATION OF
POWERS.
HE OWNS THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES.
HE OWNS THE SENATE.
THE SENATE, THE HOUSE, WILL NOT
MAKE A MOVE WOULD HIS CONSENT
AND PERMISSION.
AS OF LATE, HOWEVER, THERE ARE
SOME INDICATIONS THAT SOME
INDEPENDENTS -- SOME
INDEPENDENCE IS STARTING TO
PRESENT ITSELF.
BUT GENERALLY SPEAKING, THE
PRESIDENT DOESN'T RESPECT
SEPARATION OF POWERS.
IF A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE
DISAGREES WITH HIM, HE
IMMEDIATELY CALLS UPON THE
CONSTITUENTS OF THAT MEMBER TO
DO WHAT IS NECESSARY WITHIN THE
LAW, GENERALLY SPEAKING, TO MAKE
SURE THAT THAT MEMBER GETS PHONE
CALLS.
TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT MEMBER IS
INTIMIDATED.
TO THE EXTENT THAT THAT MEMBER
HAS TO RECONSIDER WHATEVER THE
DISAGREEMENT WAS.
THIS IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES.
THE INTIMIDATOR IN CHIEF.
HE PRIDES HIMSELF ON HIS ABILITY
TO INTIMIDATE, TO GET PERSONS TO
COOPERATE.
SO HE DOESN'T BELIEVE IN
SEPARATION OF POWERS.
HE DISRESPECTS THE HOUSE AND THE
SENATE.
THE MEMBERS WHO DON'T GIVE HIM
WHAT THEY -- WHAT HE DESIRES.
DESIRES.
HE'S ALSO A PERSON WHO THINKS
THAT HE CAN LITERALLY DO
WHATEVER HE PLEASES GIVEN HE HAS
THIS MANDATE FROM THE SUPREME
COURT.
THE SUPREME COURT HAS
INDICATED -- I SAY MANDATE, HAS
GIVEN HIM AN INDICATION THAT HE
IS ABOVE THE LAW.
IN CERTAIN AREAS.
THE SUPREME COURT DIDN'T USE THE
LANGUAGE "ABOVE THE LAW" BUT THE
SUPREME COURT HAS GIVEN HIM THIS
BELIEF HE IS ABOVE THE LAW.
THE SUPREME COURT TALKED ABOUT
IMMUNITY.
HE'S TAKEN IT AS AN INDICATION
HE'S ABOVE THE LAW AND TAKES IT
AS HE CHOOSES.
AND ONE OF THE REASONS THAT VICE
PRESIDENT CHANEY MADE THESE
COMMENTS, THE VICE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
THESE ARE MY WORDS, NOT VICE
PRESIDENT CHENEY'S BUT THE VICE
PRESIDENT INCITED THE
INSURRECTION.
THERE ARE PEOPLE USING OTHER
TERMINOLOGY, BUT THE
INSURRECTION THAT TOOK PLACE
AFTER THE ELECTION WHEREIN HE
WAS DEFEATED.
HE INSIGHTED THE PERSONS TO COME
OVER TO THE CAPITOL OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE
CITADEL OF DEMOCRACY AS IT IS
CALLED AND KNOWN AS.
HE INSIGHTED THEM TO COME OVER
HERE TO INVADE THE ALCOHOL
ITSELF.
AFTER THE INVASION TOOK PLACE,
THEY WENT THROUGH THE HALLS.
THEY DID SOME VERY UGLY THINGS
ASIDE FROM CALLING FOR THE
LYNCHING OF PEOPLE.
THEY HAD THE GALLOS ASIDE FROM
THESE THINGS, THEY DID OTHER
THINGS.
SOMETHING AS DEMEANING AND VIAL
AND AS DEFECATING IN VARIOUS
PUBLIC PLACES WITHIN THE
CONGRESS, WITHIN THE BUILDINGS.
THESE WERE SOME VERY VIAL,
MEAN-SPIRITED PEOPLE WHO
INNOVATED THE CAPITOL AND THEY
DID THIS AT THE BEHEST OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA.
AFTER ALL OF THIS WAS DONE, THE
PRESIDENT BEING SWORN IN ON
JANUARY 20TH OF 2025, AFTER ALL
THIS HAD TAKEN PLACE AT A PRIOR
ELECTION, THE VERY FIRST ACT THE
PRESIDENT ENGAGED IN, IT SEEMS.
AFTER HE RAISED HIS HAND TO BE
SWORN IN, UPON LOWERING HIS
HAND, HE SEEMS TO HAVE RUSHED
OVER TO SOME PLACE THAT HAD A
DOCUMENT THAT ALLOWED HIM TO
PARDON THE PEOPLE THAT DEFECATED
IN THE CONGRESS, IN THE
BUILDING.
THE PEOPLE THAT MARCHED THROUGH
LOOKING FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT
AT THAT TIME INDICATED THAT THEY
WANTED TO DO HARM TO IT.
HE PARDONED THESE PEOPLE.
THIS WAS HIS VERY FIRST ACT, IT
SEEMS.
IMMEDIATELY AFTER BEING SWORN
IN.
THIS IS THE PERSON WHO IS
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA.
AND UNFORTUNATELY, THERE ARE
MANY PEOPLE WHO JUST BRUSH ASIDE
WHAT HAPPENED ON JANUARY 6,
2021.
THEY JUST BRUSH IT ASIDE AS OH,
THAT HAPPENED BUT IT WON'T
HAPPEN AGAIN, SEEMS TO BE THE
ATTITUDE AMONG THE MINDS OF
MANY.
IF HE DID IT ONCE, WHAT MAKES
YOU THINK HE WON'T DO IT AGAIN?
WHERE IS THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
TO SUPPORT THE NOTION THAT THE
NOTION OF THE PERSON WHO INCITED
THIS, THE VERY FIRST ACT HE HAD,
THAT HE ENGAGED IN AFTER BEING
ELECTED PRESIDENT AGAIN, ON
JANUARY 20TH, THAT'S WHEN THE
PRESIDENT WAS SWORN IN IN A VERY
RAMBUNCTIOUS WAY, A DEMEANING
WAY, IN FACT, PEOPLE DIED AS A
RESULT OF THIS.
HE INSTIGATED THIS.
WHAT CAUSES PEOPLE TO THINK HE
WON'T DO IT AGAIN.
I BELIEVE THAT HE WILL P. I
BELIEVE THAT HE WILL FIND GREAT
DIFFICULTY IN STEPPING DOWN FROM
OFFICE, AND AS A RESULT OF HIS
NOT RESPECTING THE SEPARATION OF
POWERS AS A RESULT OF HIS NOT
UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE SHOULD
BE SOME INDEPENDENCE IN THE
JUDICIARY, THAT THE JUDICIARY IS
NOT FOR HIM TO SUPERVISE, I PUT
ALL THIS INTO MY COLLECTION OF
THOUGHTS, AND AS I DO SO, I HAVE
TO AGREE WITH VICE PRESIDENT
CHENEY AND IN OUR NATION'S
48-YEAR HISTORY THERE'S NEVER
BEEN AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS A
GREATER THREAT TO OUR REPUBLIC
THAN DONALD TRUMP.
YES, HE TRIED TO STEAL THE LAST
ELECTION, THE ELECTION BEFORE
SEPTEMBER 6, 2024, WHEN THIS
STATEMENT WAS PUBLISHED.
HE TRIED TO STEAL THE LAST
ELECTION, USING LIES AND
VIOLENCE TO KEEP HIMSELF IN
POWER AFTER VOTERS, THE PEOPLE
IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
THE VOTERS HAD REJECTED HIM.
HE CAN NEVER BE TRUSTED WITH
POWER AGAIN.
I WILL BE BRINGING ARTICLES OF
IMPEACHMENT, BECAUSE WHAT VICE
PRESIDENT CHENEY, MAY HE REST IN
PEACE, WHAT VICE PRESIDENT
CHENEY SAID THEN, SEPTEMBER 6,
2024, IS TRUE NOW.
WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE TRUSTED
HIM.
HE HAS BEEN GIVEN A SECOND
CHANCE TO STEAL FIRE FROM THE
GODS.
WE SHOULD NEVER HAVE ALLOWED HIM
TO DO SO.
BUT THERE IS A REMEDY.
WHEN THE COURTS CAN'T CONTROL
HIM AND WHEN HIS PARTY WON'T
CONTROL HIM, THEN THE ONLY
REMEDY LEFT IS IMPEACHMENT.
THAT'S ALL THAT WE HAVE.
AND THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE WHO
WOULD SAY THAT THIS IS NOT THE
RIGHT TIME.
WELL, LET'S ADDRESS THE QUESTION
OF TIMING.
DR. KING SAYS THE TIME IS ALWAYS
RIGHT TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT.
IF THE REPUBLIC IS AT RISK, THE
TIME IS ALWAYS RIGHT TO DO WHAT
IS RIGHT, TO MAKE SURE THE
REPUBLIC IS PROTECTED.
I WILL BE DOING WHAT I BELIEVE
IS RIGHT TO PROTECT THE
REPUBLIC.
THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO SAID TO
THOSE PERSONS WHO AT THE EDMUND
PETTUS BRIDGE ON BLOODY SUNDAY,
THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT TIME TO
MARCH.
DON'T MARCH NOW.
LET'S DO IT ANOTHER DAY.
BUT THE HONORABLE JOHN LEWIS WHO
IS A MEMBER OF THIS VERY HOUSE,
A COLLEAGUE, HE SAID NO, WE
MARCH.
AND THEY DID MARCH.
AND THEY MARCHED KNOWING THERE
WOULD BE HARM THAT THEY WOULD
HAVE TO SUFFER.
THEY KNEW THIS.
THEY SAW THE CONSTABULARY AS
THEY APPROACHED THE CREST OF THE
EDMUND PETTUS BRIDGE.
THEY KNEW WHAT WAS GOING TO
HAPPEN BUT THEY MARCHED ON.
IF THEY COULD MARCH ON KNOWING
THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BE
HARMED, AND THE HONORABLE JOHN
LEWIS TOLD ME PERSONALLY HE
THOUGHT HE WAS GOING TO DIE ON
THAT BRIDGE.
THEY BEAT THEM ALL THE WAY BACK
TO THE CHURCH WHERE THEY
STARTED, CHURCH-GOING PEOPLE,
BEAT THEM ALL THE WAY BACK.
IF THEY WOULD MARCH ON FACING
THIS KIND OF DANGER, SURELY I
SHOULD MARCH ON AND BRING
ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.
I'M NOT -- I'M NOT REQUIRING OR
ASKING ANY MEMBER OF THIS HOUSE
TO VOTE WITH ME.
VOTE YOUR CONSCIENCE.
DO WHAT YOU BELIEVE IS RIGHT.
I'M GOING TO VOTE MY CONSCIENCE.
I'M NOT GOING TO VOTE TO TABLE
THESE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.
THOSE WHO VOTE TO TABLE ARE
INDICATEING THAT FOR WHATEVER
REASONS, THEY DON'T THINK IT
SHOULD BE AN ACTUAL VOTE, THAT
THERE SHOULD BE AN ACTUAL VOTE
ON THE ARTICLES THEMSELVES.
THEY'RE SAYING LET'S PUT THIS
OFF.
WELL, IF THAT'S YOUR OPINION,
THEN YOU DO THAT.
BUT THAT'S NOT MY OPINION.
THERE NEEDS TO BE A VOTE, NOT
ONLY ON THIS MOTION TO TABLE
THAT WOULD BE PRESENTED BUT ALSO
A VOTE ON THE ACTUAL ARTICLES OF
IMPEACHMENT.
THIS MAN IS A THREAT TO OUR
REPUBLIC.
HE CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY WAS RIGHT
THEN AND HE IS RIGHT NOW.
I'M GOING TO BRING THOSE
ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.
AND I CAN ONLY ASSURE THE PUBLIC
WHO IS CONSTANTLY ASKING ME HOW
MANY VOTES DO YOU THINK YOU'LL
HAVE?
I CAN ONLY ASSURE YOU OF ONE
THING.
I WILL HAVE ONE VOTE.
THIS I CAN ASSURE YOU OF.
I WILL HAVE ONE VOTE.
WHY?
BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT IT IS
BETTER TO STAND ALONE ON SOME
ISSUES THAN NOT STAND AT ALL.
I WILL STAND.
I WILL PRESENT THE ARTICLES AND
WHEN I VOTE, IF I'M THE ONLY
PERSON TO DO IT, I WILL KNOW AND
POSTERITY WILL KNOW I HAVE DONE
THE

[admin]

Trump SCREAMS as His Rally EXPLODES Into DISASTER
Adam Mockler
Dec 9, 2025



Transcript

The president of the United States is
quite literally hosting a hate rally in
Mount Poono, Pennsylvania after he
visited the great Commonwealth to sell
the people on the state of his economy.
The way that he speaks about the economy
being in a quote unquote golden age is
just inongruent with how the average
American feels when they visit the store
and when they look at their wallet.
We'll get to the economy in just one
minute, but Donald Trump early in the
rally begins attacking Ilhan Omar,
Representative Ilhan Omar, and her
turban, calling her a quote unquote
[ __ ] making fun of her turban. And by
the end of this clip, the crowd is
literally chanting and screaming to send
her back, send her back. These rallies
are becoming increasingly dark. And as
somebody who has been to about 40 maybe
50 Trump rallies and interviewed the
people there, I've seen the people get
increasingly angrier throughout the
years. So drop a like, subscribe. We're
going to commentate over all of this.
And let's start with this really dark,
disturbing clip.
I think that's a great like Somalia.
Welcome.
Do we have any individuals from Somalia
in the group? Please raise your hand.
That's for Minnesota. You know, that's
called the great big Minnesota scam with
one of the dumbest governors ever in
history.
[Applause]
I love this Elon Omar, whatever the hell
her name is, with the little king, the
little turban.
I love her. She comes in, does nothing
but [ __ ] She's always complaining.
She comes from a country where
I mean it's considered about the worst
country in the world, right? They have
no military. They have no nothing. They
have no parliament. They don't know what
the hell the word parliament means. They
have nothing. They have no police. They
they police themselves. They kill each
other all the time. I love she comes to
our country and she's always complaining
about the constitution allows me to do
this. The const we ought to get her the
hell out. She married her brother in
order to get in, right? She married her
brother.
Can you imagine if Donald Trump married
his sister? Beautiful. She's a beautiful
person. If I married my sister to get my
citizenship, do you think I'd last for
about two hours or would it be something
less than that?
She married her brother to get in.
Therefore, she's here illegally. She
should get the hell out. throw the hell
out. She She does nothing but complain.
Okay, that is a racist lie. But then
listen to how the crowd begins to chant.
[Applause]
And of course in the background I see
someone that I've debated like five
times at these rallies. His name is
Edward Young.
[Applause]
So now
disturbingly racist stuff. Look at this
guy. Look at the crowd. All sickopantic
cultlike with Trump hair at the back of
their head chanting send her back at a
congresswoman who is wellliked in her
district. Next you see Donald Trump
gaslighting about prices. He says that
prices aren't really high.
Hey, you know, and I said it the other
day and a lot of people misinterpret it.
They say, "Oh, he doesn't realize prices
are prices are coming down very
substantially." But they have a new
word. You know, they always have a hoax.
The new word is affordability.
So, they look at the camera and they
say, "This election is all about
affordability."
Now, they never talk about it. They
never talk. Thank you very much. They
say, "I'm not allowed to run." I don't
know what the hell that's all about, but
that's okay. They said four more years.
You've seen the new hat. We have four
more years.
These are like the deranged ramblings of
the homeless person who used to live
outside my apartment. I'm not even
joking. This is like when I used to
visit my friend in high school and his
racist scenile grandpa would be ranting
and raving. It's worse than that. It is
legitimately worse than that. Trump
claims that he saved Christmas.
Remember when I started in 2015, I made
my first speech and I said, "We're going
to bring back Christmas." Remember they
wanted to the radical left wanted to get
rid of the they wanted to get rid of the
word Christmas. I said I don't think
that's going to work out and we did it
and now everybody's saying merry
Christmas again.
First of all, I'm as liberal as it gets
and I have always said Merry Christmas.
Secondly, this rally so far is the
definition of fascism and it only gets
worse. It is one center figure who acts
as a, you know, populist ideologue who
stands there and spouts hyper
nationalist stuff like send her back,
send her back, makes fun and tries to
crush the opposition and tries to paint
himself as the sole savior of the
country, of the economy, of Christmas,
of all of this. You can see him painting
the forces of good versus evil. the
people who want to take away Christmas
versus him who wants to save Christmas,
save the economy, chant quote unquote
send her back because she wants to take
Christmas away from you. You can see how
he connects all of these things and it's
disturbing. He then goes on to uh talk
about how great Caroline Levit's lips
are. I don't
We even brought our superstar today,
Caroline.
Stand up, Carol.
[Music]
Isn't she great? Is Caroline great?
You know, when she goes on television,
Fox like I mean, they dominate. They
dominate when she gets up there with
that beautiful face and those lips that
don't stop like like a little machine
gun. She's got no fear. You know why she
has no fear? Cuz we have the right
policy.
Something about that is very very odd.
just knowing the way he's abused power
dynamics with previous women and he
always has these blonde women out there
in front. He then has multiple cognitive
misfires where he calls Susie Wilds
quote unquote Susie Trump.
Haven't made a speech in a little while.
You know when you win when you win you
say I can now rest.
So Susie Trump, do you know Susie Trump?
Sometimes referred to as Susie Wild.
Susie Trump. She's the great chief of
staff at the They don't use the word
chief of staff anymore because of uh the
Indians got extremely upset.
This guy is I don't even know what this
guy's talking about. So on his
affordability tour, he gets the crowd to
cheer for tariffs and boo the quote
unquote fake media for being against
tariffs even though he's rolled some of
the tariffs back conceding that they
don't work. You
know they the word remember when I said
tariff? My favorite word is tariff.
True. But then I got a lot of heat from
the fake news. Look at all of them back
there.
I took a lot of heat. I got up early on.
I said my favorite. It's turning out,
you know, tariffs are bringing us
hundreds of billions of dollars. I just
helped our farmers out because they're
starting to do really well.
I mean, I think I'm going to return to
some of these Trump rallies and ask his
supporters before and after the rallies,
hey, when he talks to you about
affordability, do you actually feel this
on a day-to-day basis? Because Trump has
spent a lot of this rally claiming, and
I quote, u they said he doesn't realize
prices are high, prices are going down
substantially. They always have a new
hoax. He then said later on, rent prices
are down. You know what you did during
the buy error for Thanksgiving? It was a
rotten Thanksgiving. He continues to go
on about how prices are down across the
country. It is just in congruent with
how people feel. I mean, check this out.
Midas Touch says, "Trump is a disaster
on the issue of affordability, and he
keeps making it worse for himself and
the entire GOP. Lying to Americans about
the economy and prices is objectively
the worst possible way to handle this
crisis, and it will backfire bigly."
Biden did something kind of similar near
the end of his term where he was saying
prices everything's fine, everything's
fine. And while technically some
indicators were recovering compared to
their worst point, at that point
inflation was embedded and people were
just feeling the pain. So they weren't
liking it. But Trump is repeating this
issue 10 times worse by saying,
"But that's our message. They gave you
high prices. They gave you the highest
inflation in history. And we're giving
you we're bringing those prices down
rapidly. Lower prices, bigger paychecks.
You're getting lower prices, bigger
paychecks. We're getting
the price of orange juice is up 31%. The
price of bread up. The price of beef up.
The price of chicken, the price of
everything other than maybe eggs, which
is down like 12 cents over the past year
after a huge spike in the interim. So
everything is going up mainly due to
tariffs, mainly due to inflation being
baked in. And Trump continues to say
it's down.
Uh inflation, we're crushing it and
you're getting much higher wages. I
mean,
dude, this is some gaslighting [ __ ]
Lower prices. Where where are the lower
prices? As the economy continue to
source and heading into the midterms,
he's not going to be able to gaslight
like this. He's going on a tour around
the country. And if you want to see us
follow it, if you want to see us debunk
the lies and hit the ground, then make
sure you're subscribe below. I'll see
you on the next one.

[admin]

Part 1 of 3

‘What a CROCK of S***!’ Piers Morgan vs Nick Fuentes | Full interview
Piers Morgan Uncensored
Streamed live on Dec 8, 2025 Piers Morgan Uncensored
For several months now there’s been no avoiding the subject of Nick Fuentes - and accordingly, Piers Morgan has spent a lot of time talking about him.

And it doesn’t make much sense to spend all this time talking about Nick Fuentes - but not TO Nick Fuentes. And on that basis, he was invited to appear on Uncensored, and accepted.

Piers Morgan asks him about his most controversial past comments, on race, religion, women, Hitler, the Holocaust and his real thoughts on his conservative peers, from Tucker Carlson, to Candace Owens to the late Charlie Kirk.

Editor’s Note: On this platform only, we decided to cut out two short uses of the n-word - after the livestream ended - to ensure the interview remains accessible.



Transcript

Introduction
Whether you're a New York Times reader, an NPR fan, a Daily Wire subscriber, or an avid consumer of all things Tucker
Carlson, for several months now, there's been no avoiding the subject of Nick Fuentes. And let's be clear, the main
reason you're hearing about him is because he's popular. A large number of people, especially young men, are
interested in what he has to say. What that says about our society and our culture is the subject of ferocious
debate. For many people, it's a grave indictment of an insidious immorality. For others, he's a product of a culture
which has turned on its own and left many young people feeling listless and bitter. He's either a litmus test for
right-wing hypocrisy on free speech or a walking talking manifestation of where the line should be drawn. And a frankly
preposterous amount of air time has been spent on debating everything from his ideology to his sexuality and whether
anyone should actually talk to him at all. If I were writing a glossery entry on the Streryand effect, I wouldn't put
a picture of her next to it. I would put a picture of Nick Fuentes. They have
opted to not do so when it comes to Nazis like Nick Fuentes. Fuentes takes this guy apart brick by
brick. It's a full takedown. My concern is that people who are a bit more moderate are deeply alarmed by Nick
Fuentes. I I was very happy to see that like Nick Fuentes really passed that test with flying colors.
That fragmentation is being caused purposefully by a splinter faction of people led by a young man named Nick
Fuentes. That's the war. Can you get the beef prices down, not crazy things that Nick
Fuentes or these other loons say on social media? Well, it looks like all the screaming
about Nick Fuentes on the internet is finally dying down a little bit. So now
we had on this guy, this Fuentes guy, and never challenged him. Um, you should have Nick Fuentes on your
show and you could ask him questions about that. The truth is it doesn't make a lot of sense to spend all this time talking
about Nick Fuentes, but not actually to Nick Fuentes. People who say you shouldn't give him a platform overlook
the very obvious fact that he already has a platform of his own which is often bigger than most of the people
complaining and he uses it to speak unchallenged to his many followers. It's on that basis that I've invited him to
appear live and uncensored on my platform and Nick Fuentes joins me now. Nick Fuentes, welcome to Uncensored.
Hi. Great to be with you. I don't know you. I don't think we've ever met. You can correct me if that's
wrong. Um, I know about you. I know that increasingly people are talking about
you in a more mainstream environment uh than you may be used to. So, for those
who know nothing about Nick Fuentes, I want this to be an opportunity to get
to the real person. I don't know who that person is, but I do want to use
this opportunity to get there. I've seen you talk as we prepared for this in exchanges with people and on your show
saying if you fear it's going to be very hostile, it's going to be an ambush, all those kind of things. I don't intend it
to be overtly hostile. I don't intend to ambush you. I intend it to be an
examination of what you said on the record, an examination of what you believe or what you say you believe. Uh,
and an examination of what your rising popularity says about the state of the
conservative movement in America. So, those are my goals from this interview. What are your goals? Why are you doing
it? I thought it'd be interesting. And you know, you've talked a lot about me on
your show over the years, and this is the first time you actually extended the invitation. I think it might be the
second, actually. I think we we talked about doing it during Y24 a few years ago, but you've talked a lot about me
with the panel, and now you've extended the invitation to talk to me, and I think it'd be interesting uh for me to
maybe clarify some positions and maybe get to know you a little better as well. So, I'm looking forward to it. There is
a belief um that you have two personas. There's one that you roll out now for
podcasts and for shows like mine where you come across as reasonable
and then there's your show on Rumble where you often come across as having
Nick Fuentes responds to Coleman Hughes' claims he plays the “double game”
you know a very unreasonable view on things. This is what Coleman Hughes said about you.
Nick Fuentes knows exactly what he's doing. He is consciously playing this double game as part of a long-term
strategy to become popular enough to take the reigns of power at which point
he plans to pivot towards the extreme and unpopular policies that he advocates
daily on Rumble. So first of all, what is your response to that?
Well, first of all, I would say that Coleman Hughes is a propagandist. He works for the free press which is run by
Barry Weiss. So, I think that's you have to consider the source and Barry Weiss is a pro-Israel partisan. Free Press is
just bought out by CBS for $150 million uh by Larry Ellison or his son David
Ellison. And so, I think that's coming from a particular point of view. We can't pretend like that's coming from a
vacuum or from some fixed position. That's coming from a propaganda outlet that's in favor of Israel. That's first.
But second, I would say he is right about the two personas. And I think that
everybody understands this on some level. On my show, I make jokes and I use rhetoric and I'm hyperbolic. Uh
because for a long time, I had an audience that was small on these like dissident platforms. I was on dive for
many years. A lot of people don't even know what that is. And so I had a small following and we had sort of like an
in-group sense of humor and memes and things like that. And you talk about it
one way on a freewheeling live stream when I'm by myself and I'm ranting and we make jokes and um we play devil's
advocate. We play with different positions. But then when you sit down in an interview like this one and people
ask me a good faith question. What do you actually believe? Well then I clarify and I say well here I'm not
joking. Here I'm not being hyperbolic. I'm not being rhetorical. I'll tell you precisely what I believe. As far as this
idea that I'm going to get power and then turn into Hitler, that just sounds totally insane to me. I'll be honest. It
just sounds insane. Do you have aspirations for political power?
Uh, not really. I I think that uh if I wanted to run for office, I wouldn't say a lot of the things that I say. I don't
know that a lot of people would vote for me. I tend to offend everybody, even a lot of people that like me. Uh, so no, I
I'm a trutht teller. I like to tell the truth. I like to do my live stream. Who is Nick Fuentes? Tell me about your
Nick Fuentes on how his background has shaped him
upbringing. I know you grew up in in the suburbs of Chicago. Uh tell me about
your early years or early how like my childhood or a
little bit later? Early childhood. Yeah. Well, I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago in Lraange Park as you say. Uh
my parents are ethnics. Um you know, my father's half Mexican, half Irish, my mother's Italian. and they both came
from a pretty rough upbringing themselves. They both were raised by single mothers, not because of divorce,
but because both of their fathers had died. Uh they endured a lot of dysfunction and I think that's one of
the reasons they came together and they related to each other and they wanted to create a normal upbringing for their
children. They wanted to have a normal family life and so uh they moved out to Lraange Park away from the city and uh
they raised me and my sister and really put us first. I think that's a big reason why uh I tend to have a lot of
these family values or Christian values. My mother quit her job and stayed at home to raise us. Um and so I have very
close relationship with my parents, with my sister. We're a very tight family and we grew up in a pretty idyllic town. Uh
and maybe we can sort of get into a conversation about politics from this. I loved my upbringing. My mom stayed at
home. My dad was working. We're in a mostly white suburb in Chicago. Everybody was I was maybe half Catholic,
half Protestant. It was a baseball town. I played baseball for many years. Um, in
Chicago, we love our hot dogs. We have our baseball parade and get a hot dog. And so, I love where I came from. I love
the city. It's a working-class city. I love the people here. They're very good, humble, downto-earth, decent people. And
I guess I had my political, not to jump ahead, but this is a big part of where my political awakening came from. I sort
of left this bubble, if you could call it that, when I went to college in 2016.
I went to Boston University and I read a lot of things online and I realized the country does not look like Lraange Park.
It doesn't look like Western Springs or Hinsdale or Elmherst. It looks very different. The country is undergoing a
radical transformation because of immigration. And so I saw that and I said, "This is not really a desirable
change. I don't like the south side of Chicago or the west side or LA or
certain parts of Boston as much as I like where I came from. And I guess that's what made me an American
nationalist. I said, I want to preserve my home and the things that are familiar to me and the things I like about my
home, what makes it America. Uh, so that's a little bit about my background. And I don't know where you want to go with that, but
well I suppose my first my first obvious question is were your parents immigrants to the United States or were their
parents or were they grandparents? In other words, at some stage I presume there there were immigrants in your
family who came to the US. Is that correct? There were there were uh I believe my
mother was fourth generation and my father was third generation. So, their
ancestors came here on my mom's side in the 1860s, I believe, the first wave of
Italian immigration. My father's ancestors, I think they came around at the turn of the century uh in 1900. So,
so your view of immigration, and we'll get to the specifics about your views on immigration,
are they not affected at all by the fact that if it wasn't for immigration, you
wouldn't exist as an American? Well, I would certainly exist, but like
you said, maybe not as an American. Certainly, uh, certainly that's influenced in some measure. Um, but I
think that the kind of immigration that we had for a long time in the country, it's different than the immigration that we have now. And let's just say for
openers, it's different immigrants. They're coming from a different place with a different culture, a different
religion. Uh, it's not the same as it was. So, first, you have a qualitative
difference. My ancestors for the most part, I have three European grandparents from Ireland and Italy, one from Mexico.
They came from Europe. They came from a society where there's a common ancestry. There's a common religion, common
civilization. The people that have come in since ' 65, since Heart seller, they're coming from China, India, the
Northern Triangle, Mexico, Venezuela. And so, first, they're just different people. Secondly, it's a quantitative
difference. There's way more. And it's an unceasing, always increasing wave. For the first
three or four waves of immigration, you would have a major influx of immigrants and then it would stop and then you'd
have another wave and then it would stop. This one, it just keeps going up for 35 years and it's too many. So that
that's really where I would draw the distinction between maybe where I originate from. I would even just simply
call that immigration. What this is is an invasion. It's a completely different policy.
You mentioned Mexico in that list. Um, and your father is is half Mexican. So,
yeah. I mean, by your criteria, part of the invasion would include your father presumably and his immediate descendants
who came from Mexico. Not really true because when my father's
ancestors came here, it was a small fraction of the total immigrants that came from Mexico. I don't believe that
we should have zero immigrants forever or even zero immigrants from non-white countries. But you have to draw the
distinction. My my father's father, he was here in the in the 40s and 50s. It
was his parents or I believe either his parents or grandparents that came here even earlier. Up until 1965,
90% of the immigrants were coming from Europe. I have no problem with that. If we have 10% of them coming from Mexico
or Latin America, maybe that's reasonable. But that's not what it is now. Now you've got 10 million illegals
in four years under Joe Biden. Uh and you got millions more legal immigrants from China, India, Venezuela, El
Salvador, and it's so many with no break for assimilation. And they're all from
non-white countries. It's transforming what America is. And and again, that's the distinction. That's what makes it
unacceptable. I I always believe everybody is a product of their environment, right? I've interviewed
thousands of people. I I mean it maybe three, four, five thousand people from all different walks of life, but the one
common theme I would say is everyone's a product of their environment. And I I
was reading some stuff about you in the last few days. There was an episode of of your podcast where you talked about
your father, Bill Fuentes, and how he wouldn't take the family, including you, to certain restaurants because he
believed they were associated with African-Americans. We would be deciding where to go to eat, you said. What are we going to do for
dinner tonight? It was a running joke. Me and my sister would say, "Applebees." And my dad would say, "We would never
eat at Applebee's." "Not in a million years should you be caught dead," Fuente said about Applebees. go to a different
restaurant, a local restaurant, no Applebees, no Red Lobster that is commonly known as Black Fair. Uh, and
you also share another story about your family and restaurants said, "Before me and my sister were born, my family had a
saying about Olive Garden that contains the nword that we're not allowed to say."
So my question based on that anecdote that you say on your own uh podcast is
do you think you grew up in a racist environment that your father was inherently racist and that that thought
process move to you? Well, I would say it's a new low. I I've
been attacked for being a racist many times, but to attack my father, to attack my parents based on anecdotes, I
would say that's that's sort of It's your Hang on. It's your anecdote. Yeah, but he's not here to defend
himself and my parents are. You told the story and I will and I and I'll just I'm not trying to ambush you. As I said
at the start, Nick, to be clear, no, it's not an ambush. To be clear, I think everybody I'm not ambushing you. I'm literally reading an anecdote that
you revealed on your podcast. It's you that's put it in the public domain. Now,
I'm simply asking you whether my assessment of that, which is that your father didn't want to take you to
certain restaurants because of what you refer to as they were commonly known as black fair, whether that whether that
attitude to African-Americans in in that instance permeated to you. It's a
reasonable question. Yeah. No, like I said, I think everybody knows what that is, but I'll address it.
I'll engage with it and I'll defend my father from the charge of racism. It's true. No, my parents my parents are not
racist and they've never been racist. I'll tell you about my parents. They used to have a school in Chicago in the
South Loop where they instructed people on how to shoot firearms. It was a security school and most of the clients
were black. Um, and I believe actually one of their clients was Larry Hoover's son at one point. Sort of a funny story.
And so most of their clients would come in from the south side of Chicago. My grandmother, she grew up in the projects
in the city. And so my family being in Chicago being ethnics uh being Italian,
Irish, Mexican in the west side, uh on Taylor Street, all over the city, my
family for many generations have lived near and around black people. And look, my views about black people and their
views about black people are shaped with experiences with black people. Uh and and what they will tell you, what my
parents would say if they were here is that for many many years, the older
generations of black people were very respectful, very humble, very decent. In
fact, my grandma used to have an anecdote. She grew up in a lot of dysfunction. her mother was mentally ill
and they would be having dinner in the projects and there'd be so much chaos and dysfunction and disagreement and
fighting and she would look across the way out the window at a black family in the other apartment and they'd be
holding hands around the table saying grace. And this is sort of the culture that used to prevail. But now what you
have in the city is that there's no accountability for the black people. And now Chicago has become a complete dump
because these teenagers go out and they take over the city. They call them teen takeovers. Uh that's the euphemism for
it. They're teenagers, but they all come from the same neighborhood. They drive up there and they mug people and attack
people and they destroy cars and destroy shops. We had the Festival of Lights a couple of weeks ago. It's supposed to be
a family event and they light up the trees and they, you know, there's a big parade. I was in the parade one year and
you had a bunch of black people there shooting each other. Seven people shot, a 14-year-old killed in the Magnificent
Mile. And and I know there's a lot of black people that feel the same way about this. They say, "We've lost
control of the city, and we're looking for accountability." We have a lot of black people that are always outraged
about racism, outraged about attitudes from white people, but they're never ashamed of some of these behaviors,
never ashamed of some of the things that go on. And that's why I think there's a lot of negative attitudes these days.
And so, you know, again, I think those attitudes, you say, "I'm a product of my environment." I I am, and so are my
parents and my grandparents, unlike you, because you're not even American. In Chicago, we have to live in a in a big
diverse city where there's a lot of different kinds of people. And um I don't think anybody tell you the same.
I live in I live in London. It's one of the most of the biggest and most diverse cities in the world. But it's not the same.
Well, actually, it's a big it's a big diverse city. The only difference is we don't have the gun violence because we don't have guns. That's a whole
different story. I don't want to get into that with you. I have got into that before. We got a knife problem. He got sword problems.
We have we have problems. We have problems with violent crime. I make no pretense of it. So the idea that somehow
I'm causeted in London because I'm not in Chicago. Say that. Well, you kind of implied it, but I guess my point about the environment,
I'm not saying you are a product of your environment. I'm saying most people are in some capacity. When I read that
anecdote, it's just to remind you is it's not something I have put out there. You told this story, right? And you said
Piers Morgan asks Nick Fuentes if his father's views made him racist
that you said this. We're looping. You said this. No, but you haven't really directly, I think, responded to it, which is whether
your father would not take you to certain restaurant chains because he associ associated them with black
Americans. Is that true? No. Well, see here, if you're in America, you
would say that Olive Garden is not real Italian food. Applebee's, TGI Fridays,
this stuff is a load of crap. My dad was just a food stop, but no, it's got nothing to do with that. My best friend in first grade was a black guy. We are
not we're not a racist family. So, okay. So, when you told the story, I'm just curious. So, when you told that anecdote, which clearly on the face of
it is racist, right? You're you're basically saying your father made racist
decisions about where you would go as a family to eat. Are you saying Well, well, I'm just going to ask you a
question. Are you saying that when you told that story, you didn't mean to infer that he was racist? And do you
understand why when somebody like me reads that anecdote for the first time, as I did this week, I reach a different
conclusion? Well, I understand what you're doing, which is a sort of making of a murderer.
How did he become racist? Well, his father didn't read because he said that's not real Italian food. Hang on.
Can I read? Can I explain? I'm literally reminding you of something you said on your show which led me which
led me to conclude a certain thing. I'm wrong. Tell me. Yeah, it it was said and just as a humorous anecdote and now you're trying
to spin it into a narrative which is his parents are racist. He comes from a long line of racist. Uh and I think everybody
knows our parents my parents are boomers. Mhm. and these people come. Well, you're a boomer, I guess, too in a way, right?
You were born in what, 19. Yeah. So, you're a boomer also. Or maybe you're a Gen Xer. I suppose it's sort of on the
cusp. Uh, but it's a humorous anecdote. These are kind of the attitudes of baby boomers in society. But you're trying to
spin it into a narrative which is you're a product of your environment. Your dad's racist because of this joke. Now
you're a racist. And I don't think that's a fair characterization. Okay. People can make their own minds up. They can they can go back and listen
to you say it. I mean the the beauty of what I'm going to talk to you about in this interview is that almost all of it
Nick Fuentes doubles down on his rant again ‘Jews, women and blacks’
is just going to be reminding you what you have said and asking you what you meant. Your position about that story is
that it was a joke. Okay. Um I want to come to to something else you said. Uh
this is where you talk about Jews, women, and blacks. Let's just take a listen.
They're always coming up with no it's not the Jews. No, it's not women. No, it's not blacks. It's actually really
complicated. No, it [ __ ] isn't at all. Jews are running society. Women
need to shut the [ __ ] up. Blacks need to be imprisoned for the most part. And we
would live in paradise. It's that simple. Okay. Would you like to clarify what you
meant there? That's all true. That's 100% true. Everything I said in that clip is true.
Including that uh blacks need to be imprisoned for the most part. Uh yeah. Yes.
Well, all of them. No, for the most part. What does the most part mean? What percentage of American blacks would you
like to see in prison? Uh whatever the percentages of the murderers, I think it's one in 20 black
men will commit a murder in their lifetime. So maybe let's say that 5%. Oh, so you're talking about black people
who murder people. Yeah. Oh, absolutely. Yeah. But you didn't say that. You just said blacks need to be imprisoned for the
most part. You didn't clarify that. You were talking about black murderers. Right. Right. No, you're right. That's a
good addition to that. That's a great point. You think it's Do you think it's funny or
I think Yeah, I do. I think it's hilarious. I think it's totally true. Do you think a black American would find it funny? You think that that blacks
should be imprisoned for the most part? Blacks are my biggest fans. I get high fives all the time. They say, "Nick
Fuentes, I love your show." They agree with me. And you want to know why? Here's the difference. Black people are
the most victimized by other black people. You think black people want to live in the hood and the ghetto and get shot all the time? That's what happens
in the south side of Chicago. You should come here. I'll take you there. We could go to Garfield Park. Went to Chicago University for a year
actually several years ago. Yeah. That's a bubble. That's a bubble. You think you're in Chicago and Hyde
Park? You don't know Chicago. Go a little bit west. see what it's like over there. And I'll tell you, black people
agree with me because they're tired of it, too. And maybe not most of them, but a lot of them agree with what I say about that because they know how it is.
That's why the first thing they do when they make a little bit of money is they go and leave to another neighborhood. Okay. So, what was Just Remind me again
the percentage of black men who commit murder in America? What was the
percentage you gave me? It's one in 20. One in 20. It's It's one in a 100red.
No, it's one in 20. No. No. Less than one in a 100red black US men commit murder. That's the most
up-to-date crime statistics in America. That's not true. I' I've seen other statistics. They say one in 20 will
eventually commit a murder. I Your rate means that you're you're saying that five times as many black men
commit murder as the official crime statistics say. Yeah. There's a report, I believe, on X
by Data Hazard. I'll have to go and double check that for you, but yes, there's some pretty shocking evidence that says that it's far more alarming
than you would think. Okay. But you you would accept that the official crime statistics are one in a 100 or you
wouldn't accept that statistic? I I don't know. I don't have it in front of me. But I've seen other evidence.
Like I said, Data Hazard on X, I believe, produced a report about a year ago. It said one in 20. But I mean,
whether it's one in 20 or one in a 100, that's a lot of people, peers. I mean, a lot of white people commit murder,
too. Well, they do, don't they? Okay. But it's about it's about proportionality. I mean, white people
are 65% of the population. Blacks are 13%. Mhm. And I think anybody would tell you that
more black people proportionally commit violent crime than white people. And people vote with their feet. People
would rather pay a much higher property tax. Most with the interruptions. I'm sorry.
Thank you. I appreciate that. You know, you look at in Chicago, in New York, these neighborhoods are so stratified.
People would rather pay a high tax rate. They'd rather pay a much higher property value to live in a less diverse, less
black neighborhood because they don't want to live around the violence. And I think that when you look at even on the
public transit, the subway, the blue line, you know, people don't want to go there because they know who occupies and
menaces the public transit, it is uh these people like Daniel Penny had to deal with. It's people like Arena
Zerutka had to deal with. And uh and that's just the uncomfortable reality. You you've also said you don't want to live
near black people. Well, let's take a listen to this clip. I'm a new generation of white person.
I'm not living around blacks. Sorry. You know, I want white kids and I don't
want my white kids bringing home black people to marry. It's racial for me.
And call me racist. Oh, very Christian to you. I don't give a [ __ ]
I mean, it couldn't be clearer really. Um, unless you want to say that's another of your jokes, but you're
basically saying, "Yeah, I'm a racist, aren't you?" Uh, yeah. Yeah, I'm fine with that.
Nick Fuentes: "Everybody except white people are racist"
You're fine with saying you're a racist. Totally. I think everybody's racist. I
think everybody, if we're being honest, is racist? I think everybody, the only people that aren't racist or or pretend
not to be are white people to their detriment. Everybody else is racist. But you spent you earlier in the interview
you you went really got agrieved at the idea that your father was a racist. You you wanted to make emphatic
my father's he's not because my father doesn't share my same views on that. So he's the exception to the everyone's
a racist. Well everybody's a little bit racist. You're right. So maybe everybody the
difference is you're attacking my father. You know he can get fired from his job. I'm not attacking your father. I No, I'm
not. I don't know your father. And to be clear I I have no knowledge about him at all other But let's leave him out of it.
Let's leave him out of it if you don't know him. Hang on, Nick. You put that story into the public domain on your show. I'm
simply reminding you of what you told everybody, millions of people, about your father. If you now want to retract
it, fine. If you want to say it was a joke, which is what your position was earlier, fine. But I'm allowed to put to
you things you said publicly. That's not unfair. That's not me targeting your father. You put that story about him out
there. You know what you're doing. You know what you're doing. I'm asking you about a pretty shocking anecdote which to me looked like you
were saying your father made decisions about where you as a family would eat based on skin color of people who worked
at these places. If you say or use them if you say that is not what you meant,
that's fine. You can respond any way you like. But the idea I can't ask you about it without you saying I'm attacking your
father is ridiculous. Well, you are and you know what you're
doing. And there's a political culture in America where if you have the wrong views, you get fired from your job. And my father has a job. And if you go on
here and say you charge him with racism or something and I'm put in a position where I don't look like I'm sticking to
my guns if I don't say my father's a racist, you're putting him in jeopardy and he's not here to defend himself or
explain his views. And it's very low. And uh and I think you know exactly what you're doing and people can see what
you're doing. I'll defend my views and I think that, you know, so let's leave him out of it. Let's just not talk about my
father because my father isn't here. I'm here. Well, then do you accept that you shouldn't talk about it? Listen, that's fine. But then do you
accept you shouldn't talk about your father on your show and you shouldn't tell? Absolutely not. Absolutely not. So, it's fine for you to put a story out
there which would make most people who listened to that story or watched it at
the time on your show conclude that he was racist. It's fine for you to do that, but if I then ask you about it,
I'm the one who's being unfair and I've crossed a line. Is that what you're saying? Yes. Yes. You're being malicious.
Okay, that's fine. That's fine. Listen, people are watching this live. They can draw their own conclusions about whether
what I just did. They will. Yeah. And I'm sure afterwards, by the way, you'll say, "He ambushed me with your
with your own with your own words." That's a little presumptuous. I'm not
going to say it's an ambush, but I think that's a low blow and I think you know what you're doing and and that's fine. You're a tabloid journalist. I expected
that. I don't think it's an ambush because I knew it would be like this. And people will see what you're doing and I think they'll say it's low. But as
far as you want to talk about racism, let's talk about racism. Let's leave my head. Look, you've admitted you're a racist,
correct? Yes. 100%. Own it. Okay, that's fine. You're perfectly
entitled in a free democratic society to stare down the barrel of his camera and
tell me you're a racist. People can judge you accordingly. Many people many people who have assumed that you're
racist will now have heard it from your own lips. That's fine. There you go. That's the point. The point of this
interview is to go over the things you've said which have led people to reach conclusions about you and to
ascertain whether those conclusions are fair and reasonable or not. That's it. I
want to play you another clip. This is where you talk about why white people are justified in being racist. Let's
take a listen to this. First, white people are every single bit
justified in being racist. Every single bit justified to the extent
that that means going out of your way to avoid black people when you see them.
Can you stand by that? Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely.
So, white people should go out of their way to avoid black people when they see them.
Absolutely. They would be wise. Why? Because it's a lose-lose proposition. If
you're Ireina Zerutska and you don't walk the other way, you get stabbed to death and you die.
If you're somebody else and you walk on the subway and you stand near a black
person or something, maybe it's fine. Uh it's a lose-lose proposition. Um so no,
I I think that white people I think that white people have been beaten into submission that were afraid to tell the
truth about it. And the truth is that when you go into these major cities like New York or Chicago, I believe she was
in North Carolina. There is a menace which is young black adolescent men. They're extremely
violent and we have been told that we have to pretend like they are every other person. We have to be colorblind
to that and we're supposed to go and and be in the midst of all this danger. And
I think that at this point it's gone out of control. You look at the BLM movement, they said that the reason that
black people um you know are violent or the reason there's crime is because of police brutality, redlinining or all
these other things. They said we need to get rid of the police. We need to defund them. And a lot of cities did. A lot of
cities like Chicago for example, the police change the rules of engagement. They don't chase them. It's not a
felony. If you steal a certain amount of merchandise, they won't chase them on foot. And now the city's totally up for grabs. And now whether you're in the
Gold Coast or whether you're on the Mag Mile or you're in the worst neighborhoods in the city, you might get
shot, you might get mugged, someone might run up on you. And and I tell my followers, it is better to be perceived
as racist or racist and walk the other way and maybe keep your life than to
say, I'm a good anti-racist. I don't mind that this person's making me uncomfortable. Maybe he's looking a
little froggy. I'm going to sit down because I'm a good person and gets stabbed, mugged, whatever. And by the
way, this is a strategy. They call it the friendly stranger. There's a crew of them. They do this in Chicago. They
stand outside bars, black people. They approach strangers. It's a robbery crew. And they pretend to be a friendly
stranger and then they mug them. And stupid white people say, "Oh, hi. Yeah, nice to meet you." You know, they grin,
they laugh, they put up with the nonsense, and then they get mugged or worse. Sometimes they get executed. And
so, as a white person, how do you feel? How do you feel about mass shootings at school?
I think they're bad. Who do you think commits mo the vast majority of the mass shootings?
I'm sure it's white people. Right. So, how do you feel about that?
I think that white people do more antisocial violence. I think black people participate in more gang
violence. I think that's the difference. What's the difference to the victims?