Janta Ka Reporter
Jun 2, 2026 #MarcoRubio #IranCrisis #MojtabaKhamenei
US President Donald Trump’s Iran strategy is beginning to worry even his supporters after it emerged that he had to admonish Benjamin Netanyahu for derailing the peace process. Furthermore, Trump’s Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, today revealed that the new Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, was alive and actively engaging with his military to coordinate their moves. Rifat Jawaid examines the sharp contradictions between Trump’s public statements on Iran and the reality on the ground.
Transcript
Did Israeli slave Donald Trump indeed give war criminal wanted by the International Criminal Court Benjamin Netanyahu a dressing down in a phone
call yesterday? This is what Western media outlets claimed the deranged occupant of the White House did. Trump's
minion Marco Rubio today appeared before the Senate where he confirmed two things. First, the Iranian supreme
leader Mashtabali Khame was alive and actively coordinating the war moves against the US and the settler colony.
And second, the fear caused by the Iranian military in the state of Hormuz in Lebanon. The Israeli terrorists have
continued to drop American bombs. This will be the broad focus of my video tonight. Also in this video, an American
journalist is banned from entering the UK for criticizing not the UK or its monarch, but a foreign settler colony of
Israel. So, please stay tuned. So, the reported claims that Israeli lab dog Trump called bloodthirsty terrorist
Netanyahu to admonish him for derailing the peace process with Iran has dominated the global media coverage.
You're effing crazy. You'd be in prison if it wasn't for me. I'm saving your
So the headline when it comes to Lebanon is that Donald Trump has said that Israel and Hzbollah have agreed to step
back from the intensity and the renewed fighting that we've seen recently.
But this comes after this phone call between President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister. And there are reports that it was completely explosive. So, this conversation was reported by the US outlet Axios, coming from two US officials and a third source. Apparently, a Washington official said,
"You're effing crazy. You'd be in prison if it wasn't for me. I'm saving your ass; everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this."
If this is true, and they've got multiple sources saying it is, it's unbelievable. You're definitely right not to say the swear words, cuz it's pre-watershed at 5:15 a.m.
What led to this? Is this really what Trump wants? And is it really going to be adhered to?
Yesterday, the first development US time was Iran saying, "We're done with these talks." Then in
middle of the morning US time, President Trump spoke to CNBC and said, "I don't care about these talks." He then backtracked very quickly as oil prices spiked, and put out a truth social to say talks are going great, and had this call with Netanyahu. Why do I say all of that? Because there's a sort of process now that is on repeat. Participants in the market are definitely saying this, which is he basically says whatever he needs to say to make sure oil stays within a band, and that the economy doesn't get too derailed in the US.
But many called the claim highly dubious, and rightly so given the control of Netanyahu over US politics and its president. They argued that Trump was simply incapable of speaking to baby killer Netanyahu in such a language, adding that the reported content of this conversation was deliberately leaked by the White House to make this Israeli lap dog look strong in the eyes of his own support base, which by the way is beginning to question his move on Iran.
How will he explain the continued Israeli barbarism in Lebanon? The Israeli army has carried
out several attacks and several more attacks today on southern Lebanon's Nabatia governorate. An air strike hit
the town of Dubai in the Marayun district following a bombing in the same
area while air raids also targeted the towns of Hadatha and Kakayyad Aljis.
Take the example of British foreign secretary and unknown Zionist Iet Cooper who wrote this yesterday and I quote,
"Israile's military escalation in Lebanon has killed and displaced civilians, destroyed infrastructure and
eroded space for diplomacy. It must end." Hisbah must end attacks on Israel
and disarm. All sides must respect the ceasefire and engage with negotiations in good faith. end quote. Just see the utter shamelessness of this vile woman.
She admits that Israeli atrocities have displaced civilians. Israeli atrocities.
She is saying that and destroyed infrastructure.
But Hezbollah must end attacks on Israel and disarm. She's not talking about IDF disarming themselves.
These are the parasites masquerading as civilized lawmakers.
5 minutesNot just her. Watch this clip of the UK representative at the UN Security Council. He admits that children and
babies have been mercilessly slaughtered in Lebanon, but he refuses to name the
perpetrators, i.e. genocidal Israeli human devils.
President UNICEF reported that 15 children were killed and 62 injured in Lebanon last week as a result of the
conflict. That's 11 children killed or injured every .
Healthare workers are also facing death and injury as they carry out their duties.
The escalation must end. We call upon all parties to uphold their obligations under international law.
No wonder these thugs are unable to explain their wararmongering activities even to their own people. America's
Secretary of Thugri, Marco Rubio, today appeared before the Senate, and boy, he was completely exposed. Senator Chris
Van Holland set the scene. Secretary, this is your first public hearing since President Trump and Israeli Prime
Minister Netanyahu launched an illegal war against Iran. Netanyahu said he's
been waiting 40 years to do this. Turns out he finally found a president who was both stupid and reckless enough to join
him. The war has killed 14 American service members, wounded hundreds more, and killed thousands of civilians. It's
driving up the price of gas, food, and much more. Trump obviously doesn't care.
He called high gas prices peanuts and said, "I don't think about Americans financial situation." That's from the
president of the United States. And all for what? President told us 91 days ago that we had quote won the war in Iran.
Last year he told the country Iran's key enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
Was that false? Let's face it, Mr.
Secretary. The Trump foreign policy has become a dumpster fire. This is the same president who's more interested in
flattering Vladimir Putin than in protecting Ukrainian sovereignty. The president who lifted restrictions on the
transfer of sophisticated US chips to China but came back from his trip there with nothing but ballroom envy. Tweeted
about that the other day. This is the president who brought on Elon Musk to take a chainsaw to aid which has enabled the current Ebola outbreak in the DRC.
We've also witnessed corrupt crypto deals with the UAE royal family that have enriched the Trump family at the expense of our national security. We've
seen an administration engage in extrajudicial killings in the Caribbean, hijack Venezuelan oil, threaten to
invade Greenland, and weaken the NATO alliance.
Senator Cory Booker followed the street of Hummus was open before this unjustified war. We're now
scrambling to try to find a way to get it back opened again. Not only is it causing economic havoc to our country and to residents all around this nation,
families trying to make ends meet, but you see on top of that, the Iranians finding ways to leverage that as we
allowed them to do with the Chinese for tens of billions of dollars. And so my point is before we even get to a nuclear negotiation, this regime is getting
money to rebuild, purchase more drones, cause more havoc, and this is before we're even trying to get back to But I don't I apologize. I don't understand how they're getting this.
What What revenue are you referring to?
Well, there's two sources of revenue we're seeing. One is the revenue from the Chinese that's factually documented.
And number two, the revenue that you're proposing that they should receive by releasing all of their highlyenriched uranium as well as in in making a
commitment about their enrichment capacities. Hold on. And that was the exact deal that you guys vilified that
the president and you vilified President Obama from having.
Yeah. Now here we have a worse situation where our adversary and our enemy who's causing havoc in the region who is
funding proxies and terrorists has discovered thanks to you all the power of shutting down the street of Hermuz.
No they didn't discover they knew that a long time ago and they clearly we all knew that a long time ago. That's why this and they intended to do this war should have never happened.
You have made our adversary in a stronger negotiating position. We are the strongest nation on the planet earth and we're in a stalemate with Iran and
now we're begging to get back into a deal that you all trashed in the first place. There's no one begging.
Clearly, this is a Senator Booker. Senator Booker, your time's up.
And when it was time for Chris Murphy, his penetrating questions forced Rubio to inadvertently express his fear of the
Iranian armed forces in the state of Hormos. the same Iranian armed forces that Rubio's boss says have been decimated.
The straight is closed because of our decision to invade Iran. This is a consequence of our military action. So I
I guess I'm not interested in litigating that question. We all know why the straight is closed because you took military action against Iran and we knew
ahead of time that that would be their likely response. The question is how are we going to get it reopened? Are you gonna drive a bargain that is so tough
and so hard that the straight remains closed? So, how are we gonna get it open?
The first thing that is a predicate to anything else happening. The straits have to be reopened. So, the way to think about it is this. If Iran wants to be able to move its oil again through
the straight, they will have to reopen the straits. If they refuse to do so, then we have other options available to us, but we would prefer to negotiate the opening of this, which means
Tell us about the negotiations. What do you need from them in order to get the straight reopened? We need the straight reopened tomorrow. Well, what needs to happen is very simple. They need to they need to announce that they will no
longer fire on commercial ships that are going through or threatened to fire on ships because in many cases ships just won't move. They won't go not because they got fired on, but because of the
risk of being fired upon and so they have to announce very clearly the straits are now open. We're not charging a toll. We will help remove the mines
that they put in there. And they will not fire on ships.
But the president says they also need to make commitments on their nuclear program. That's what I'm asking. What Oh, I see what you're saying. What commitments do they need to make in order for the strait to be reopened?
The second thing they have to agree to as part of this is so in addition to the straits, that's the predicate that opens the door to phase two. Phase two is they have to commit to very specific
negotiations on highlyenriched the disposition of the highlyenriched uranium that still is buried deep in a mountain somewhere. They have to they
have to in they have to agree on negotiating severe if uh and long-term limitations and or cancellation of
enrichment activity in their in the second phase of negotiations.
Well, that would obviously these are highly technical matters. So I don't think you could work those out in 5 days. You that would require a team of experts to meet over a 30 60 90day
period and work out the details. But they have to commit to their willingness to do that. For example, they have to commit to say we will dispose of the
enriched uranium. And the question now is what are the mechanisms by which we do so that that can be negotiated.
Final question. In order to get to that second phase, are you willing to release sanctions or release frozen money that
uh the United States is withholding from right now everything that's been discussed with them is that any sanctions relief, now remember sanctions come, there's international sanctions,
there's congressional sanctions, there's executive sanctions. So some we can release and some we cannot. But any sanctions relief is conditionbased, which means it has to be in return for
the reason why those sanctions were put in place in the first place, which is their nuclear program. Rubio was perhaps referring to yesterday's attack on a
commercial vessel in the state of Formos. This was after the Mediterranean shipping company MSC confirmed that its
vessel Sariska Vi was struck by two projectiles in the port of Umaser.
The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations first reported the attack southeast of Umakaser, but did not name
the ship. Iran's IRGC later claimed to target the US-owned Sariskavi following an attack on an Iranian ship near Oman.
MSE said the strikes were completely unjustified based on the allegations made by the IRGC since MSC according to
them is a completely neutral carrier with no affiliation to the United States
or Israel. Then Rubio did another unthinkable act. Perhaps the pressure of intense grilling over his boss's illegal
war against Iran got him rattled as he contradicted Trump by saying that not
only was Mushtab alive and well he was also coordinating the war moves during the ongoing conflict.
I think there are indications out there that he is increasingly engaging at some level although all of his communications have been in writing and through
intermediaries. So you the way to think about is the following. You have the supreme leader and understand that at the end of the day the supreme leader in their system is there really is no
analogy to it in our system or anybody else's system. Now we are in talks and I say talks because talks with Iran are not like talks with Switzerland. Okay?
They're very different. But Trump would call media outlets who report on the defeat of the US and Israeli forces at
the hands of the Iranians both militarily and diplomatically fake news.
This is what he wrote today and I quote, "Fake news reports that the Islamic Republic of Iran and the USA stopped
speaking a few days ago are false and eronous. The conversations between us
have been going on continuously, including four days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, one day ago, and today. Where
15 minutesthey lead, one never knows. But as I told Iran, it's time one way or another for you to make a deal. You have been
doing this for 47 years and it cannot be allowed to go on any longer. President Donald J. Trump. End quote. Such is the
condition that even Trump's own favorite TV channel, Fox News, is now confused over his strategy visa v Iran. I was
going to start this off by saying, Brett, that I'm I'm a little puzzled as to what the actual strategy of negotiation is, but President Trump put
this out seconds ago on Truth Social. He says, "Fake news reports that the Islamic Republic of Iran and the USA stopped speaking a few days ago are
false and erroneous. The conversations between us have been going on continuously, including four days ago, 3 days ago, two days ago, one day ago, and today. Where they lead, no one knows.
But as I told Iran, it's time one way or another for you to make a deal. Does that give you hope that something's in the offing?
Uh, not really.
I will now leave you with two clips of American journalist Jenk Huger, who has been denied entry along with another journalist called Hassan into the
UK by British Home Secretary Shabbana Mahmud for criticizing Israel. And the same people have a problem when I say
the UK has been colonized by the murderous regime of war criminal Netanyahu. In the first clip, Jenk
explains what happened to him and the second clip shows him shut up the pro-Israeli LBC presenter.
The most remarkable thing just happened.
Uh I went to the airport to go to London. I'm going to give panel speeches at uh South by Southwest London and two
speeches at Oxford. But it turns out I'm not because the person at the United uh counter said you have been banned from
the United Kingdom. Uh it says here the government has rejected you. So I already had a visa. It was a 2-year visa. I was in the middle of it. So they went in and pulled the visa apparently.
I had no idea why. And I have to say that it was a bit of a gut punch. I it's a little bit hard to shake me, but I was
uh shaken there because if that feeling of having your freedom taken away was so visceral. No, you're not allowed to
travel to Oxford, to London, to the United Kingdom, you're banned. You don't have that freedom anymore. Why? At the
time, I didn't even know. I uh saw a Times of London article uh which is filled with total nonsense uh and but
bit of a hatchet job against me. Um and I they said it's because I've criticized Israel. Guys, are we free anymore? This is insane.
So 60% of America is critical of Israel.
They have nothing that I've said that's anti-semitic because I haven't said anything anti-semitic because I'm not anti-semitic and I don't believe that you should discriminate against anyone.
That's actually my core philosophy. I'm for complete nonviolence and equality for every race and religion. So since
they don't have that they said well by definition criticizing Israel is anti-semitic. My god how many people are they going to ban from the United
Kingdom? Millions of people. Billions of people. 60% of Americans are critical of Israel. Are we all going to get banned?
You've described Israel as barbaric and savage. You've claimed Israel uses Jews as human shields. Your critics claim that you're sitting dangerously close to
the kind of language uh that is creating the kind of conspiratorial fever that's lead that's led to a huge amount of anti-semitism on
our streets. Now, you know, you we cannot lay all of that we cannot lay all of that at your feet. Of course, we can't. But do you ever question the language you use?
No, not at all. I I question whether it should be tougher. Uh I mean, we're all going to ask ourselves later, what did
we do to stop a genocide? And so what people who are Zionists and fervent supporters of Israel do is they hide
behind anti-semitism and they use anti-semitism as a weaponized charge to defend disgusting immoral actions of a
foreign government. For what it's worth, and I speak to the British public every day for three hours, 5 days a week, nobody in this country thinks you can't criticize Israel. I want to ask Well, I just got banned for it.
Well, well, we'll see. We'll see exactly what the reasons were given. And then you may you may be right that that has happened, but people But that is the reason they gave they gave it to the press.
That's the government. I'm talking about the people of the country. Can I ask Well, the people of the country are beautiful. They agree with me.
Can I Well, not all of them do. But can I ask is that not the kind of inflammatory language that might have contributed to being banning because
most hang let me let me finish my question. More disgusting than the Holocaust. More disgusting than camp in our lifetime.
It's that's the kind of inflammatory stuff that does get people fired. Okay. No, no, no, no, no. That's insane.
So wait a minute. You want me to just give a pass to this foreign government?
That's so No. Then how? No, no, no, no, no. These are all tricks. These are all tricks to say don't criticize this way.
Don't criticize that way. No, you're immoral if you're not deeply criticizing the Israeli government.
That's it for me. Thank you very much for your support of this platform and our journalism. If you haven't subscribed to my channel, please do so
because that's one of the many ways you can support independent journalism. God bless you all.
